| ||||
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in candidate for president of America 2012 |
| ||||
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in candidate for president of America 2012 |
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page: 1 2 3 4   |
|
|||||||||||||
| Write in candidate for president of America 2012 | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sun Jan 30th, 2011 12:12 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I run a campaign based upon the clear understanding that it is wrong to torture and mass murder for profit. Don't torture and mass murder for profit - and don't send tax money to people who do - please. I also solve the problem of sending tax dollars to torturing mass murderers and, at the same time, fix the economy with 2 products offered to anyone on the planet earth once I am in office and once I am in a position to employ political power toward that goal. Product number 1 is a no interest home and business mortgage loan offered to anyone who already has a high credit rating. Product number 2 is a 1 percent interest loan for people with high credit ratings whereby the loan money borrowed is used exclusively for the purchase of power producing or power saving products such as Solar Panels, Electric Cars, and Modular Vertical Farming Units, as only 3 examples that can illustrate the dynamics of both product 1 and 2. The republic of American can be financed exclusively by the 1 percent interest price charged to consumers of product 2 and no other "national interest" is required, including the maintenance of a republic military apparatus. In other words the work of defense will either be pared down to that which can be purchased with the surplus earned by saving republic (not national) government expenses, the cost of paying the president, the senate, the house of representatives, etc., and what is left over is budgeted toward defense, and additional defensive power is handed back to the independent separate states within the republic known as America. As president I can, but won't, ignore the constitution (all presidents since Washington have ignored the constitution when ignoring it is in their own best interest, or in the best interest of their constituents, their financiers if you prefer) and once returning to the constitution I can work toward the plan by which political economy can be restored in a moral and economic sense of restoration - by using products 1 and 2. No More Legal Criminals vote for me or The Monkey Business Cycles Perpetually The ball is back in your court
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Feb 5th, 2011 10:05 am |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
VP Choice still
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Mar 29th, 2011 11:10 am |
|
3rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Interest based?I will diverge here a bit to criticize the Libertarian Party, self-proclaimed party of principle. A significant minority of libertarians, including some influential and popular politicians within the party, happen to be pro-war. They praise the state for martialing soldiers and building bombs to kill people in other states, for some state-defined rationale that is consistent only in its variability over time. Of course, supporting state wars – especially given what we now know about the ways states go to war and justify those wars throughout history – is inconsistent with freedom. The state’s language gives us a clue, because it generally puts forth that the state is always fighting FOR freedom, rather than extinguishing it (which is what a war-time state does both at home and abroad). I believe the state abuses the language this way because human beings were designed to exercise and intuitively love real liberty.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Apr 16th, 2011 10:49 am |
|
4th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, I did something in 1996. I had help. I am on that path again. In 1996 I ran for congress. The Libertarian Party helped then. I just sent a Web Based form of currency to The Libertarian Party asking for help in my effort to run for President. People may tend to laugh at this point, and seriously that knee jerk reaction measures something important. People may scoff, and that too measures something. Here is a link: [url]http://www.lp.org/run-for-office[/url] My effort as a legal representative will be to produce 2 legal products that I can describe in great detail to anyone with a brain, anyone with a will, anyone in command of reason, and anyone who still holds dear their moral conscience. If you, or anyone, ever wondered what could be done, if something would be done, to turn this up-side-down world right-side-up, then you have probably heard a few possible plans of attack, a few possible solutions, and you probably have a few ideas working yourself. All the ideas, that everyone has, are competitive, and as all those ideas compete, the lower quality ones are set aside, the higher cost ones are set aside, and as the rubber meets the road, the number of ideas pare down to the few and then the fewer that actually have the power that accomplishes the job. If no one cares to even look into any of the workable solutions, what happens? Here is your chance to look into one competitive solution. I don't care who solves the problem, the problem I call legal crime, where the worst of the worst human garbage gain control of the law enforcement power, and they then set about, and accomplish, the goal of eliminating all competition. What I do care about is the innocent victims who are powerless to defend themselves from those legal criminals who get their power from the innocent victims. How can the innocent victims gain power, and gain enough power to be able to exert that power, effectively, in the work of defending, completely avoiding, injury by those legal criminals? If you have no answer yet, then now you can have one, if you want one to work with, and if you prefer to remain powerless, by the measure of having no answer to that question, then so be it. If you know the question, but refuse to even entertain an answer, then my suggestion is for you to get right in front of a mirror, look at yourself, and know the problem, you are looking at it. What I will be doing on this path is, in physical terms, transferring data from person to person, and that is called, in physical terms, currency. These symbols of text flowing onto this network is, in physical terms, a form of currency. What form of currency, anywhere on the planet, in physical terms, is the most powerful currency, at the lowest cost? Truth? How do you know what the truth is; do you require an official rubber stamp on it? Use your own brain, please. On this path I place before you, or anyone, a form of currency, for you to judge, for yourself, and for you to use your capacity to judge, to ask a few important questions, and answer those questions for yourself. You may then find answers that can solve problems, or you may then find cause to retreat into a state of apathy and ignorance - I can't know. I can offer: Product 1 Product 2 Product 1 and Product 2 are competitors in the legal monetary currency market to be offered to any potential consumer of legal monetary products and these 2 products intend to force The Federal Reserve products out of business, or force their products to become higher quality products at a lower cost, it matters not who produces the best legal monetary products, at the lowest cost, once competition is once again lawful in legal monetary markets. What matters is the flow of power, and the intention of Product 1 and Product 2 is to cut the legal criminals credit card, revoke their license to extort, and do so by providing a much more powerful currency, and a much lower cost to the consumer - resulting in no more power flowing from those who create power to those who steal it, and make that reversal irreversible. Once competition is once again legal, the legal criminals will no longer be able to turn the tables again, unless the power producers forget the hard won lesson again. Product 1 and Product 2 are at the idea stage of production, but even at that state they are, in fact, forms of currency. Ideas are forms of currency. Intellectual property rights are enforced for reasons, not for somebodies sense of entertainment, not for random non-reasons. An idea is a form of currency, some ideas are more powerful than others, just like gold, per ounce, is more powerful that Silver, per ounce, as those forms of currency compete as forms of currency; when expressly not against the law, and even then they compete as "Black Market" competitors. A song is a form of currency, a movie, a bill of rights, a cooking recipe, a joke, a wise old saying, and even laughter is a form of currency. Happiness is a form of currency. Misery loves company. Which do you prefer? Do you settle for the worst legal currency imaginable, and then when you have had enough of that doom day parade, do you prefer no currency at all? Are you waiting for approval from your masters before you invent your own currency? American history records many examples of inventive American people who produce their own currencies, stuff that does the job, and costs less than the competition. Just after Americans drove out the invading British legal criminals between 1776 and 1788, Americans invented Whiskey as a currency, because the new legal criminals at home began to oppress Americans with a new legal money extortion racket. Look it up, or take my official word for it. Product 1 and 2 can answer many questions asked by many Americans seeking answers to troubling questions, if reason is used, if logic is used, and if dogma is set aside for the merest fraction of time. In detail: Product 1 is a no-interest loan produced by any producers anywhere and preferably producers with at least some measure of oversight, transparency, traceability, and accountability, or, in other words, a license. The license holder (or by whatever means that holds the producer accountable other than a license) produces product 1, and offers product 1 to consumers who want product 1. Product 1 is an amount of legal money. The producer of product 1 creates an amount of money. That amount of money is a debt note charged to the borrower of that amount of money, on the borrowers good faith and credit, and that money is used for one thing only. Product 1 us used by the borrower to pay off an existing mortgage loan, one thing, only one thing, or buy a new home (or an existing home) with a new mortgage, one thing. Product 1 is not an inflationary device, not something to be used in the work of Booming and economy, and then Busting an economy, because the only thing that happens with Product 1, the only thing that can happen with it, is exactly what it does, which is to pay off interest bearing mortgages, and allow wealth earning people, the actual people who produce wealth, to borrow from their own good faith and credit, and avoid the tax of mortgage interest. You must allow your mind to become free from the dogma for the tiniest of a fraction of a second, allow that window of opportunity to crack open slightly, just for a second. Then slam it shut. The truth here will work on you, or you are too far gone. Challenge me, see what happens. Challenge this offering, see what happens, do so in the privacy of your own mind, if you still have one. I will be back on this path.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Apr 19th, 2011 01:21 pm |
|
5th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Presidential Challenger
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Apr 19th, 2011 03:48 pm |
|
6th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, What solutions do the other challengers offer to those who seek to hire a representative to represent them in the highest office of government? I offer 2 things only, but these two things are tangible things, these two things are unambiguous things, and anyone, anywhere, can know exactly what these things are, exactly what these things intend to accomplish, and therefore anyone, anywhere, can judge these things to see, without leaving any room to invent hidden messages, or discover secret messages in between the lines, or stumble upon hidden messages in the fine print, or suffer the results of constructive interpretations that were not obviously disclosed initially, and therefore anyone, anywhere, can know if these two things will represent their personal interests - according to their own power of accurate discernment, without dependence upon a self-elected authority on the subject. Before I repeat these things I can offer, as a challenge, to be judged in competition with whatever any other challenger offers, I will communicate a few words that intend to expose the true nature of that highest office of government to which all the challengers seek to control. The office of President of the United States of America is a position of power that presides over all of the collective power produced by all of the productive people who produce surplus wealth within the designated legal boundaries of a legal fiction, and the legal fiction is a corporation, and the corporation is legally limited in the power to hold the officers accountable for any consequence, intended or not, resulting from willful actions perpetrated by those officers who use that power that they alone control. The office of President of the United States of America is not a Federated Democratic Republic, it is not a government designed to accomplish the task of perpetuating liberty, it is designed to be an ambiguous legal fiction used to cover willful enforcement of a perpetual dictatorship. Your ancestors knew this, they warned you, and you failed to discover this fact; so if you think I am seeking absolute power, so as to abuse absolute power, you are half right. You are half wrong. I offer two products only. I see no reason to do anything else with the power gained when gaining the office of President of the United States of America. I can add to those two products such things as total transparency, live video feeds, of all activities concerning the operation of government, real time documentation, published on the internet, constantly; reality television, live from the transparent office of President of the United States of America - if you have any interest in such a principled method of operating government. You can watch the president in action, even see how the president avoids being assassinated, or fails in that work. The two products I can offer are these: Product 1 is a competitive legal monetary product that is produced and offered to anyone, offered to the free market, as a home or business property loan, that does not charge the borrower any cost, and the only legal demand in exchange for the power to purchase a home, or a business property, is repayment of the total sum borrowed, or forfeiture of the home or business property purchased with the product offered in case of default on the loan. I can elaborate, and refine, the basic idea, including such details as a gradual increase in the cost, to the consumer of product 1, based upon a measurable factor of risk, such as the risks already measured with such things as a FICO score. The intent behind this product is to disconnect the legal criminals from their victims, to sever that connection whereby power flows from those who create power to those who steal it, where the mechanism by which the power is stolen is a legal money monopoly, where the operators of the legal money monopoly use that tool to create a thing called The Business Cycle, where the operators of the legal money monopoly add to and then subtract from the supply of legal units of purchasing power, on their schedule, so as to ensure that the total supply of surplus wealth does not increase to a level that is no longer within the control of the legal criminals, and to allow the legal criminals the inside information required to know when to sell (at the top of the business cycle they create) and when to buy (at the bottom of the business cycle they create on their schedule, known only to them, and to those who support them, those who lie for them, those who enforce their power to steal) so that there is thereby created a perpetual flow of power from those who create it, to those who steal it, by that specific method, without any ambiguity whatsoever, no mystery, that is how they do it, and this product literally cuts that credit card they hold as their exclusive power, cuts that credit card in half, ending that crime spree in its tracks - that paper trail ends. Product 1 gives the power back to the people who create surplus wealth, they are the true creditors, the true good faith and credit of the people of America, and when they have that power back, I see no reason why they would not make use of that power, serving their own best interests, and those producers of wealth will, by the use of that product 1, by that legal method, cut the credit card that the legal criminals have constructed, and abused, and have destroyed their own credit, and have indebted their own selves, with a debt that no serious observer can accurately balance economically. The legal criminals earn that debt, let those legal criminals deal with that debt. Product 1 replaces that whole debt structure and empowers the honest productive wealth producers of America with the power of high quality money, at the lowest cost a competitive free market will enforce, by way of the force of competition, in a free market. Product one fills the void that will become a void if, or when, the dollar pyramid scheme implodes in upon itself, the void can be filled before, or while, that implosion occurs, and product 1 supplies the demand for much needed, necessary, currency, that is the void, the void that is created in the absence of an honest productive monetary currency tool. For want of a hammer, a spaghetti noodle is a poor substitute. Cut the Federal Reserve System of Extortion credit card. Do it now, not later. Product 1 does that, along with product 2, and there will be skeptics. Product 2 intends to finance the production of both Product 1 and 2, and these two products can be designed as a legal franchise, and offered to any private contractors who can bid competitively to gain the power to profit from the production and sale of these products, limited, to the specific limits designed into the products offered, and even allowed to remain as a competitive bidding process, seeking even higher quality producers, who produce the product at a lower, and lower, cost. Product 2 is another legal financial instrument, another loan, where the charge to the consumers of the loan, the charge to the borrowers, to be paid to the producers of the loan, is limited to 1% interest, as a base limit, not factoring in additional charges determined by risk calculation, again, a known method already exists, and is already working, in the banking, and the insurance industries, whereby the costs of risks are accurately accountable, and the costs of the risks are thereby charged to the individuals who create those risks. Collective punishment is not a good idea, so why punish people who earn good credit for the deeds done by people who earn bad credit? Setting aside the calculation, and charge, for costs associated with risks, I can offer a general understanding concerning those who earn good credit and what they earn when those people who do earn good credit do all the things required in the work of earning good credit; what do they earn - exactly? Generally speaking, a person who earns good credit is a person who proves, by willful act, that they can, and do, pay back every cent borrowed, without fail. Those, therefore, are the people who prove, by willful act, that they produce surplus wealth, they produce more power than the power they consume, and the proof is well documented by accurate accounting of the financial history of each person who does, by willful act, earn good credit. They prove their power to produce more power than they consume, and they do so better than anyone else, that is what they do, and it isn't difficult to prove those facts, while they prove those facts. The good faith and credit of the American people is not ambiguous, or false, not a Utopian fantasy, it is a measurable, and accurately measurable, reality. The same exact people who are targeted by the legal criminals, are the people who empower the legal criminals, the legal criminals know exactly who they are, the paper trail is already well known, I am not inventing a means by which all the honest hard working people can be identified, and then systematically exploited. That is what is, not what I intend to accomplish with these two products. Why would anyone confuse that which is criminal, with that which can avoid crime? Who benefits from such confusion? Who produces such confusion? Product 2 does require that the borrowers increase their total profits by 1%, and that 1% increase in productivity will flow from those who create that increase in surplus wealth, to the people who produce, sell, and profit from, Products 1 and 2. Failure to pay back the purchasing power borrowed with product 2, and the extra 1% added to the total principle borrowed, results in forfeiture of the specific, listed, things purchased with product 2. Product 2 is borrowed for the purchase of products that are proven to be measurably capable of increasing surplus wealth over and above the surplus wealth used to gain ownership of those products. The design intends to move credit to areas that are proven to be profitable investments well in excess of 1%, so that the borrower, and the lender, invest surplus wealth in the work that does produce more surplus wealth. That sentence above may confuse some people. I can try to unravel that confusion, and to do so I will offer an illustrated example of how product 2 works. You have to employ your power of sympathy, and you have to step into the shoes of your future self, or you step into the shoes of your competitive neighbor, and you place this viewpoint of your future self, or your neighbor, at the bank, where product 1 and 2 is sold, in this future reality, and I can illustrate what will happen, and you can use your own brain to write your own version, as I illustrate this transaction as follows: Borrower: "What is on that list of things that I can buy if I buy Product 2?" Bank loan officer: "look at the brochure, examples are listed there, and you can invent a new product, and you can buy that new product, so long as it does produce more surplus wealth than the wealth that is consumed in its production process, by some accurate measure." Borrower: "Sounds like a whole lot of legal mumbo jumbo to me, you known, if it sounds to good to be true, it is a con game, a pyramid scheme, and I'm not going to by a bridge in Brooklyn. I wasn't born yesterday, you know." Bank loan officer: "You don't have to buy Product 2, or Product 1, you can continue paying twice what your home is worth, one entire cost of the home to the previous owner of the home, and another entire cost of a second home, a home that doesn't even exist, to our competitor bank, the one backed by the Federal Reserve Debt Pyramid Scheme, or any competitor bank under the sun, if you wish. If you think that these products before you are a pyramid scheme, what do you think the current mortgage you are paying on now is, Mr. Skeptic?" Borrower: "Ok, I'll take the first product, sure, sure, but I'm not so sure about that second one, I see on the list here, listed: Solar Panels, Electric Cars, and what is this thing here, Modular Vertical Farming Green House Units? What the heck is that?" Bank loan officer: "A solar panel is a slam dunk so long as current prices on electricity remain as high as they are generally, you will pay less for the Solar Panel than the wealth you produce by the Solar Panel, over the life span of the Solar Panel - calculated accurately, based upon where you live. More profit for people living in the Mojave Desert - of course. If current prices of electricity go up, you save even more, if current prices of electricity go down, that product will be removed from the list, as it is no longer a net generator of wealth, for that precise, and accurate reason, unless, as has been happening, Solar Panel prices go down, and Solar Panel output goes up, in which case the calculation returns to net profitability for Solar Panels, and then they remain on the list." Borrower: "What is in it for me?" Bank loan officer: "You may not be getting this, and that is OK, most people take some time to get it, but this is in your best interest because you will, as a result of this purchase, remove your entire electric bill, and in place of that entire electric bill will be a loan payment instead of an electric bill, and the loan payment will be less per month than your current electric bill." Borrower: "What if I just stop using so much electricity, then I can cut down on my electric bill, I can do that now, and if I get those damn Solar Panels, I can't do that, I am stuck with the entire monthly payment." Loan officer: "That is a very good idea, certainly, so, if you were that smart, and I'm not saying that you aren't smart, you have, Mr. Skeptic, after all, a high credit rating, you must be smart enough to manage that feat, these days, so why don't you calculate the minimum amount of electricity that you will be able to afford, and then borrow the money needed to start making that minimum amount of electricity at home, and your bill will be less than your bill if you buy that minimum amount of electricity from the central monopoly power company, with their government subsidies. Monopoly power is a subsidy, and quite a large one at that." Borrower: "Hey, look, I'm not looking for no damn subsidy, I don't want no handout, is that what you are trying to sell me, a damn handout?" Loan officer: "You must pay back every cent of the loan, plus 1 percent interest, or you forfeit the Solar Panels, and your electric bill goes up, because you no longer have cheaper made electricity made at home, by you, because you failed to earn that credit, for whatever reason, no handout, you get what you earn, is that not understandable as sound business practice?" Borrower: "I don't want no electric car neither, why would I, damn things don't get out of their own way, and what happens if I want to go somewhere, everyone knows electric cars are limited in range." Loan officer: "The electric car is only on the list so long as the price per mile of the electric car remains significantly less than the price per mile of the competition, which is, as we all know, the gasoline powered cars, and what do you think is going to happen to the price per gallon of gasoline? Currently an electric car will save you 80% per mile, or 80 cents on each dollar, and that is the savings if you buy electricity from the subsidized electric power company monopoly. You save even more if you make your own electricity independently. You save even more if you can sell excess electricity on the open market." Borrower: "You are dodging the question of range." Loan officer: "One of our customers just started a taxi service, he bought 4 new electric cars, one per each member of his family, they invented solar powered trailers that carry batteries, for those rare occasions when someone hires them to travel over 300 miles constantly, but that is a long story, and your neighbor is next in line, perhaps he already knows if he can afford Product 1 or Product 2. You can get out of line and look at the brochures, and make up your own mind, if you wish, or I can answer more questions, and I can call in another loan officer to handle the line. Do you want to know more about the Modular Vertical Green House Farming Units, they pay for themselves, and they can even generate a substantial income, well in excess of the cost of the loan, and we only charge 1%, for the loan, according to the lawful franchise." Borrower: "Why don't you go ahead with Product 1, I'll take that one, and I'll think about these other things. I have a job, a good income, I don't need more work, farming, for Christ's Sake, I'm no farmer." Loan officer: "Sure thing. I'm entering the data right now, on the web site, you can do this at home too. As far as the farming business, I can tell you that a few of our customers are using their Modular Vertical Green House Farming Units to make bio-fuel out of algae, and the cost per gallon of algae based gasoline, made by them, at their own homes, is, according to them, much less that the current price per gallon of gasoline, so they are selling their electric cars, paying off those electric car loans early, without penalty, because electric car prices are stable, and they are buying back old gasoline powered cars, because gasoline power car prices are dropping fast, and they save on gas prices because they make their own gas at home, and, one just returned to get a lone to buy 2 more Modular Units to make more cheap algae gasoline for sale at competitive, very competitive, prices. They are now directly competing with the Big Oil and winning, with higher quality gasoline at lower prices, and Big Oil is increasing their lobby expenses in Washington, here, look at the web page, the new President is tackling lobbyist personally, throwing them out, see? Wow, look, he just kicked one in the back side, isn't that amazing? I never thought I'd see the day." Borrower: "Me neither." The above illustration scratches the surface of what can be, once the people who produce surplus wealth regain control of the credit they earn. Product 1 and 2 are ideas at this time, some things that can lead to other things, assuming, of course, that the people who produce surplus wealth do eventually realize that they can no longer afford that which they cannot afford.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Apr 27th, 2011 12:14 pm |
|
7th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north972.html Anyone, That is the same link to the fire burning under The Fed. Note this question (that won't be confessed): Why are they refusing to lend money? Please, please, please put on your thinking caps for just a moment. In early 2008 the legal criminals (The people running The Fed) lorded over a known amount of total dollars. You can picture that in your mind as X. X is a measurable total number of dollars, the total account of money, the total number of dollars, when all the dollars on Earth are added up. The dollars you have in your wallet, or purse, or bank account, and every other dollar, anywhere, is that number of total dollars. Get that picture in mind, just to have a starting point, a reference point, a place to begin looking ahead, from that point or reference. Make it personal, to help get a clear understanding of that reference point, before you begin looking ahead, and remember this is a reference point that starts in early 2008. You are at your desk, you place yourself in the shoes of one of the legal criminals at The Fed, and you pick up a paper, or you go to a web page, and you look at that number of total dollars on the planet Earth and you know that what you can do is add to that number, or, if you want, you can subtract from that number, because it is within your power to do so, since you have a voting power, a say so, concerning the actual, legal, changes that will occur to that total number of dollars, before 2008 becomes 2009. You have control of X, the total number of dollars, you know the number of total dollars today, at your desk, and you decide to do what the actual legal criminals did, you decide to double that number, for some reason. The total number of dollars on Earth is X, and you decide to create that same amount of money, at your desk, and now, that you have done it, now that you have doubled the total number of dollars, you can now move that power somewhere. Everyone else, but you, has X, in early 2008, everyone else has the power to spend the total number of dollars in early 2008, and you do not have any money, or just a little money, everyone else has the rest of the total number of dollars in early 2008, in the morning on that day, and then after lunch, you decide to go ahead and double that supply of money, and now, after lunch, you have just as much money as everyone else combined, so, reasonably, you now have as much power to purchase, as everyone else combined, and you did that, for a reason, so, what is the reason, put on your thinking cap, and try to figure out the reason, because the reason is a secret, and some of us might want to know the reason, just in case we have a stake, an interest, in that reason, as that money moves from that desk to where it goes along the paper trail, as we try to follow the money from the source of the money. X = all the power to purchase held by everyone who has dollars early in the morning, early 2008 2X = as much power as everyone else combined, after lunch, and that power goes somewhere Before moving onto the point I wish to make, I see a need to report, that 2008 has come and gone, and, perhaps not coincidentally, a new war is starting - food for thought. Gary North wants to know: Why are they refusing to lend money? What I want to know, what I would do if I were the benevolent dictator in chief, strutting my royal behind right up to the legal criminals running The Fed, is this: Who, the (expletive), made you god? Then, having the power of the presidency, on live T.V., reality T.V., I would say to that legal criminal, assuming that he didn't squirm away by that time: You will either begin offering a competitive money, at a lower cost, or the honest productive people, I know, will find someone who will, and I have a few ideas to offer them, competitive ideas, that will render your extortion racket money powerless, this is your notice, (expletive)er, you can't say that you didn't know, now. It goes without saying, once you figure this stuff out, that the money was spent, is being spent, and will be spent, in the work that accomplishes the laundry list of things that must be done by any of the legal criminals who are competing for market share in the legal crime business. 1. Use the power stolen in the work of eliminating all competition. 2. Use the power stolen in the work of reducing the total power supply down to a manageable level, because too much power allows the victims to be powerful enough to avoid victimization. 3. Use the power to indoctrinate and recruit fellow criminals onto your side and no longer members of rival criminal, parasitic, groups, and no longer members of the honest productive, host, group. That short list is a general, or principle, list that has many sub categories branching out from that principle list, interesting things, things that can be studied, measured, known, and understood. You do not need confessions, I'm telling you what has been done with the power to purchase that you have created, what is being done with the power to purchase that you now create, and what will be done with the power to purchase that you will create, so long as you remain honestly powerful, and powerfully productive, which is what you do, because that is the things that must be done to accomplish the chores required in the work of production, so long as you continue to produce, will be as long as they continue to steal what you produce, until such time as you sever that connection - cut that credit card. Here is that laundry list of honest productivity: 1. Produce high quality stuff 2. Produce high quality stuff at the lowest cost 3. Agree to work cooperatively and competitively at the work that accomplishes the end result of producing higher quality stuff, at lower costs. 4. Agree to not resort to the criminal methods, such as deceit aimed to accomplish the goal of injuring innocent people, and threats of violence aimed at the goal of injuring innocent people, and acts of violence that result in the injuries of innocent people. 5. Avoid victimization (stopping sending money to the legal criminals) So the legal criminals at The Fed, are known, they do bad things, it doesn't take a genius to figure that out, so they are served with the warning, to do good or get out of the way, and examples of doing good are then presented to the honest productive people, in forms that can be easily understood, and effectively employed, whereby the work to be done, is done, and production returns to high quality productive stuff, at lower costs, instead of aggressive wars for profit, mass torture, and mass murder on scales that are unspeakable in all but the worst living hell imaginable, or made real by ignorance, apathy, and willful criminal plans and actions. The screams of the tortured innocent victims, and the piles of innocent bodies, babies, pregnant mothers, others, do not occur by accident. Know where your power to purchase goes, and then stop sending it there, once you know. Once the legal criminals at The FED are served the notice they earn, a warning, and once the power of The President, or whatever power does represent the honest working people in America, offers the alternative to the honest working productive people in America, the credit card can be cut, peacefully, simply, and effectively, and progress down the destructive path slows down rapidly, stops, and progress the opposite way, down the productive path starts, gains momentum, and accelerates at increasing rate. That brings me to my point, again, if anyone has already read my words, the money can be spent, in the following way: Product 1: A legal monetary product. A loan offered to anyone. The money is used to gain ownership of a home or a business property, to buy a new one, or pay off an existing mortgage. Product 1 charges no interest, at all, to someone who has earned a powerful, honest, productive, faithful, trustworthy, good credit history, and failing to have earned that the potential borrower, borrowing from his or her own damn self, is charged, an interest rate that is proportional to the risk the borrower earned, by failing to produce a good credit history, and that money flowing from that borrower flows to an insurance fund to offset the costs of reclaiming and reselling properties that go into default. That above may appear to be complicated, even too complicated to some, so the idea here is to assume that you have earned, by your good faith, your good trust, and your productive capacity, to pay every cent you ever borrowed, imagine that you have, if you have not, and consider how much less complicated that makes the process of accounting, and from that point of view, Product 1 is very simple. You do not pay mortgage interest for product 1. You have earned simplicity. You have earned simple legal logic. Those who have failed to earn simplicity, pay for the complexity. Is that fair enough for now? Product 1 ends the process of moving power from those who earn it to those who steal it by a significant, measurable, and accurately measurable number. I can help with simple math. Assuming that there are 300 million Americans it can be assumed that 100 million Americans will get Product 1 as soon as they can - legally. Each of an average mortgage will transfer the power that the borrower earns to the previous owner of the house, roughly 100 thousand dollars per average home, and the total cost of the house will be earned by the borrower and then transferred to the seller, and, on top of that price paid by the borrower to the seller of the home, an additional entire cost of the home, is transferred to the lender, and that practice ends with Product 1. You pay roughly half as much per month for the same house. Effectively, with product 1, each home owner pays only for the home, each home owner stops paying double for one home, whereby the cost of two homes are charged to each home owner, and the extra cost of one home, a home that does not even exist, is transferred from the borrower to the lender, and that process ends with product 1. The legal crime credit card is cut almost completely in half by that one legal monetary product. 100 million people borrow and spend 100 thousand dollars, with product 1, and they stop paying for two homes, where they get only 1 home, and they previously sent the cost of an entire home to the legal criminals who run the legal crime banking extortion racket monopoly. 100,000,000 <---------- That is the 100 million people 100,000 <---------------That is a very rough average price per home Simple math adds zeros, and I count 13 zeros, you can too. 10,000,000,000,000 There is a challenge for you, name that price. What is that number? That is the number of units of purchasing power that no longer flows to the legal criminals, and that is the number of units of purchasing power that can be saved, spent, or invested according to the individual people who have proven that they, alone, or their families working together, earn the right to spend, save, or invest that power to purchase, because they produce that power to purchase, honestly, and productively, agreeably, and without resort to deceit, threats of violence, or acts of violence, in measurable ways. Rather than stealing that power, that power is not stolen, and that Product 1 offering, accomplishes that task, as easy as American Pie, no trouble whatsoever, just do it. The Austrian Economist (dogmatists) may cry "inflation" or some other meaningless ambiguity, but when they are asked to prove the point, see what happens, their bubble bursts, and they resort to abject personal attacks, or total silence. If you want to think past the simplicity of having your hard earned wealth remain your hard earned wealth, by no longer sending your hard earned wealth to a black hole that you can't even imagine, the thing called mortgage interest, then start thinking seriously about it, just as I have done, for decades, and we can work out how that process does proceed, how the money flows, where it goes, and what consequences occur, intended, or unintended. The bottom line is that you keep the power you earn, and someone else doesn't get the power you earn, and if you want to know if "inflation" occurs, then you can do two things right now, you can think about what you will do with the money you earn, the same money that you no longer send to the black hole as mortgage interest, which is roughly accountable as half of your current mortgage payment, you pay half of your current mortgage payment, each month, with product one, you get the same house, for half the price, because you are no longer sending the cost of one whole extra house, that doesn't exist, to the legal criminals, or call them whatever word they prefer that you call them, and think, now, what you will do with that money, and I will offer you product 2, while you begin thinking what you will do with that extra money every month, and I will comment one more thing, as you do these two things that may quantify the measurable threat of inflation. If you blow that money, waste it, then you will be willfully causing inflation. If every American blows that money, those 13 zeros, they will be causing inflation. And now you are in for a shock, if you have a working conscience left in your soul, what do you think would happen of every American sent their hard earned purchasing power to buy a new war, where "our" soldiers are sent to be tortured, be murdered, or to torture others, or to murder others, would that constitute an example of blowing the money, wasting it, and would the obvious unintended consequence be, inflation, by that example of wasting money, and be an example of inflation in a very big way, not a small way, such as, perhaps, you spending the money on lap dances, or fattening food? Product 2 A second form of money is created. It is another loan. It is the other half of the already well known business strategy of giving away the razor to sell razor blades, and this product is a loan that earns the producer of the loan a profit, and the producer of the loan charges a 1% cost to each borrower. These legal loans will only move power to purchase from the legal money supply to borrowers who use that money to buy things that are things that produce more power, things that cause deflation, and things that do so in physically measurable ways, such as, for examples, solar panels, electric cars, and vertical farming modular green house units. I can help with the math on that too, but I have other things to do right now. I can only hope that the honest productive people in America want to improve their chances of survival, I can't make them. I also have to try to edit this giant wall of text before moving on.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri May 6th, 2011 09:56 am |
|
8th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Michael at The Libertarian Party contacted me via e-mail. I am sending my second response back to Michael: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Michael, I am running for president in my own way. I run an on-line presidential campaign. I did so during the last election cycle, and I am doing so during this cycle. I also managed to get on the ballot, officially, in 1996, as Libertarian, for the 40th California District House of Representatives. This presidential election cycle I added to my on-line campaign a reconnection to the Libertarian party, to see if I can combine my power to win the Presidential election, admittedly not powerful, alone, with the power to win the Presidential election that is measurably within the connection to the Libertarian party. You and I are defining that connection between me, a Presidential candidate, and The Libertarian Party. I was not impressed by the effectiveness of The Libertarian Party, as a power to help candidates win elections during my first experience. Now I'm not finding much measurable power in the ability of The Libertarian Party in finding candidates. I may not be up to your standard, sure, but I did answer a Libertarian Party web page solicitation concerning potential candidates. Your introductory e-mails have so far failed to even address the subject of candidacy. How can that be explained? I submit an office candidacy notice, on The Libertarian Party web page, 20 days later I receive a curious e-mail from you, as if you have no clue concerning me and the candidacy notice. How can this situation be explained - reasonably? My guess is that the people running The Libertarian Party are not working well together in the effort to find and then help the best representatives win office, and this current example reinforces that guess. The next thing, perhaps, guessing again, will be a suggestion that I run for a less powerful office. If that is the next response from you I can then know that The Presidential office is, according to you, not open to The Libertarian Party, which is what I needed to know before submitting my candidacy notice on The Libertarian Party web page. If the work being done appears to have no purpose, it may be that the purpose is to have no purpose. Joe P.S. I am now posting this e-mail on my Forum, because that is what i do, not what The Libertarian Party does, for whatever reason the people at The Libertarian Party do things. I post these things, like this e-mail, because I consider such things worth recording for future reference.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 10th, 2011 09:51 am |
|
9th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive Americans, Today I call back the representative from the Libertarian Party who contacted me via e-mail. I assume that the representative from the Libertarian Party contacted me via e-mail as a result of me contacting the Libertarian Party via their Web Page; when I sent in my notice of consideration for becoming the Libertarian candidate for president. Are there any science fiction readers among the readers here? An author wrote some very good books of which I will link one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender%27s_Game The IF tests all children on Earth and selects the brightest for the Battle School for military training. There is a concept illustrated in that book. The concept involves a process by which people move the best people toward jobs that require the best people to do those jobs the best. What is the process by which the best people to do the job of The President of the United States of America are moved into that job? I am not a pathological liar, I do not torture, and I do not mass murder, so, logically, I am not qualified to be as good as the majority of Presidents of the United States of America. Who represents whom? If the idea is to stop the flow of power from those who create power, currently flowing to the torturing mass murderers who then use that stolen power to keep the power flowing that way, then, I may not be the best to accomplish that job, but, at least, I have a working plan. Who else has a working plan? I can say with confidence that Ron Paul has a working plan, and that is about it, as far as Presidential challengers go. If the idea is to make sure that the power continues to flow from the people who create power to the torturing mass murderers who commit unspeakable crimes with that power, then any of the other pathological sociopaths running for president will do just fine. Take your pick. I have two other relevant things to address at this time. 1. That which is good for the goose, is good for the gander, or something called Universality, or, The Golden Rule, or, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, or justice, or fairness, or equity. I like the word equity, it works best. If you meet someone, anyone, and you get away with that person's power, he has less power as a result of having made contact with you, then that is the measure of inequity. Here is a link on that subject: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28063.htm The problem there is typical of a situation whereby the base, foundation, of rational thought is an error - or a willful lie. Error leads to more error. A social structure based upon crime is not a social structure based upon equity, or justice, and therefore it is as wrong to say that it is right to torture and mass murder, no matter who does it, because the basis of the wrong is wrong, the foundation of the wrong leads to more things that are wrong. This must be understood, or there will be more misunderstanding, not less. Example: The Declaration of Independence The U.S. Constitution The Bill of Rights Two of the above written documents are based, founded, upon a founding base foundation, that is equitable, fair, logical, reasonable, right, moral, universal, and as good for the goose as it is good for the gander, those two documents are the first and last in the list above. The exception is the middle document, which is in fact a document that is diametrically opposite the other two, and knowing this fact is one thing, and being ignorant of this fact is yet again something else entirely. Which is better? A. Knowing B. Ignorance Which is better for whom? 2. Getting from path B, back to Path A, can happen, but it can't happen by traveling further down path B, which leads inevitably to path C, and then not likely ever to get back to path A, more likely to end with human extinction. 1. Path A Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Equity, Fairness, Universality, good foundation, moral thoughts and actions, power used to make more power, productive life, higher quality life, lower cost life, less crime, reaching closer toward minimum crime, crime is less and less profitable, less and less affordable. 2. Path B Crime, legal or otherwise: profitable plans once executed that are designed to accomplish the goal of transferring power from those who create power to those who steal it, whereby the stolen power is then used to perpetuate that flow of power, and power is used to govern the supply of power down to a manageable level, a level that allows the criminals to set the price of power as high as they desire, and the consumers of power are powerless to avoid having to pay that price, and the criminal power is used up in the process of eliminating competition where ever, and when ever, competition arises. 3. Path C Accelerating torture and mass murder, accelerating rates of accelerated torture and mass murder, resulting in the extinction of human life, if not all life, on the unique planet Earth, for ever. Path B cannot logically be used, as a willful plan, to get back to Plan A. Who says it can? Why do they say such things? Is it a good idea or a bad idea to believe in such things, without question? If you are new to my words, then you may not know the following documented fact. I am going to link the official web page and then I am going to cut and paste the relevant quote, for you to know, if you want to know the truth. http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. When honest productive Americans want to stop traveling down path B, for whatever excuse imaginable that they are currently accepting that path, and they no longer accept the excuses for traveling down that path, and when honest productive Americans decide to travel down path A instead, they will, and not sooner, and not later, they will. I am on path A already, within the limits of my power. How about you? Here is a good measure of path B, for those who may want to know the measure of it: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ If you have in-place a replacement for the dollar unit of currency, ready to go when you decide to replace that crime in progress, you then step off Path B, and you then have Path A ready to travel down, so long as the replacement for the dollar is a competition that reaches for the highest quality at the lowest cost. Path C includes a worse medium of exchange, a lower quality, and higher cost, replacement for the dollar unit of currency, and it can be whatever you are forced to use by your oppressors because you fail to work effectively at reaching the goal of Path A. Path B is recorded on that Debt Clock, and it is no longer an affordable path, on purpose, as planned, by those who oppress you. Your oppressors are working toward their goal of ending The Dollar Hegemony and ushering in a New World Order with a new monopoly currency extortion racket, organized crime, cabal. They may fail, due to their incompetence, and a period of powerlessness may ensue, at terrible cost to the honest productive people who share the planet Earth with the criminals, the same criminals who think morality, and sharing, is a weakness. Path C works better for your oppressors, with our without their absolute control over the world's supply of legal money. Path A ends their reign of terror, cuts their credit card, and it is our honest productive form of regime change, if we work to make it our honest productive form of regime change, not something that will happen by accident, not something that will happen as a result of ignorance, or apathy, or stupidity, or by way of fraud, or by way of threats of violence, or by way of violence against the innocent. You can't reasonably, willfully, and knowingly follow path B, to get to path A, that is insane. How is it working for you so far?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed May 11th, 2011 11:21 am |
|
10th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.allcarselectric.com/blog/1059693_san-francisco-will-juice-your-electric-car-for-free Honest productive Americans, The link above reports a few things that you may not know, and a few things in that report may not be as accurate as possible, but the ideas, and meanings, can be instructive. There is a concept called: Give away the razor to sell the razor blades. That is an easy to understand marketing strategy that is self explanatory. An example is illustrated with the high school drug dealer. The high school drug dealer gives away addictive drugs to the high school students, making a deal with the principle, and the local police, so that all the squeaky wheels get the grease, and then the drug dealer goes in debt, giving away addictive drugs, buying drugs from Afghanistan suppliers, or buying drugs from the C.I.A., or the F.B.I, and going deeper, and deeper, into debt, until the high school students are ripe for plucking, and then the drug dealer starts charging for drugs, and then the drug dealer goes from being in debt to being out of debt, and then the drug dealer has enough money to eliminate all the other drug dealers who try to compete in the drug dealing business, at that high school, when things get rolling, as planned. So now you have two examples of a marketing strategy whereby one method is involuntary and the other method is voluntary. I. People can choose to buy razor blades from the people who give away a fancy razor, which is an obvious marketing plan, above board, no false advertisements, just good old American business. The razor blade maker makes a good razor blade, and to drum up more business the razor blade maker sinks some of the profits into an honest advertisement campaign that includes a free razor sent to a number of places where people shop, and people like free things, and people try free things to see if the thing is worth paying for once they make their decision about the quality of the free thing. II. People can be innocent, and ignorant, and exploited, in ways that include the employment of falsehood, threats of violence, and acts of violence, whereby potential victims are targeted, and a plan is hatched to entice the victims into willingly going down a very destructive path, for the victims, while the criminals make off like bandits, and the criminals laugh all the way to their bank, as they enjoy getting away with torture, mass murder, and lesser crimes; and greater crimes. I think it is important to distinguish the difference between I, and II, above, since confusion about the two separate and distinct methods of life can be destructive to the moral method, and confusion about the two methods above can be beneficial to the immoral method, and therefore it is obvious that confusion of the two, by the innocent, is desired by those who exploit the innocent, confusion is something produced by the criminals, and given away for free, the criminal elements of society make things confused on purpose. Confusion is a criminal power inflicted upon the innocent victims, smoke and mirrors. The criminal elements may also be confused, they may think such things as: Innocence is a weakness, and honestly is a weakness, and trust is a weakness, and knowledge is dangerous, and facts are to be kept secret, and other things that confuse them, as they choose the immoral method of life. Too bad for them, they reap what they sow. The link at the top of the page offers the reader a glimpse of what life can be like once the innocent members of society, those who choose the moral method of life, the honest productive Americans, once that group is no longer oppressed by the legal criminals, what life can be like, as a measurable increase in the quality of life, and a measurable reduction in the cost of life, as a direct result of reaping the rewards of following the honest, productive, true, trustworthy, non-aggressively violent path. Not utopia. You get to travel as well as before, or better than before, but now, because you were smart, you pay about 80% less per mile. While the legal criminals try to exploit you with their plans to make oil scarce, and overpriced, you choose electric transportation instead, and that single decision, that one decision, chops the power flow from you to the legal criminals off. They lose. You win. End of that story. You may say, "say it isn't so...Joe", I like my gas powered car, sooooooo muchhhhhh, and I don't want to ever abandon it, or sell it, or rent it, or loan it out, I want it, and I want it really, really bad, I'll kill to keep my gas powered car, I'll torture to keep my gas powered car, I'll mass murder to keep my gas powered car, and I'll even threaten the human species with extinction, so that I can keep my gas powered car, so, say it isn't so, Joe, I will not go electric, those pansies in San Fransisco can pound their socialist sand, up their butts, if they can get their gay friends out long enough to do so. Here is the thing, dude, about socialism, and you can take what I am going to inform you about, to the bank, or to your grave, but you can't refute the facts, you can ignore the facts, you can refuse to know the facts, you can choose to be willfully ignorant, which is a good definition of stupidity, refusing to know something, is stupid, it is a choice to be ignorant, which is stupid. Socialism can be known. there are examples of it, whenever power flows from many, to a central location, and then the little bits of power from the many accumulate into a large amount of power, you have something, and what do you call that something? Example: Many people send their son's (and daughters) to a central location, to be trained in the Art of War, and the name of the central location is The Military. What is The Military an example of, if you were to use two possible categories to place The Military within? A. Capitalism B. Socialism Does The Military belong in the Capitalism category or the Socialism category, in your mind? Example 2: Many people send their money to a fund to pay for an emergency response system whereby the people who pay into the fund can call a three digit phone number and someone will answer the phone at that number and someone will respond to the emergency. Fire, Ambulance, and Police are linked to that emergency response system. Is your knee jerking? Are you feeling the need to shout at me, and tell me how wrong I am? Would you like to be informed about the facts instead of continuing to be stupified by the confusion that is produced by your oppressors since you were an innocent child, as you never grow up as a result of such stupification from birth to grave? You may be confusing crime with socialism. You may be confusing crime with capitalism. You may be inspired to hate the socialists, and the liberals, because you think that they are all criminals, and that is very good for the criminals, and not so good for the socialists and the liberals, since you hate honest productive people along with the criminals, and you don't hate the capitalist criminals, for some strange reason. You may even love the capitalist criminals, the torturing criminals, the mass murdering criminals, so long as they say to you, the things you want to hear, as they tell you things, and they tell you lies, with a straight face, that they are capitalists, they say, and they are conservatives, according to them, and you believe them, while they know, but you don't know, or you refuse to know, that they are not capitalists, and they are not conservatives, they are criminals, legal criminals to boot. You may be inspired to hate capitalists, and hate conservatives, because you allow yourself to know that all the capitalist are criminals, and all the conservatives are criminals, and there is no way that you can ever entertain the notion that some capitalists are honest productive people, and some conservatives are honest productive people, and you may refuse to know, that among your group, there are some very bad, very bad, very bad, people, but you tolerate your own bad people, because they sooth your conscience, and they get you want you want, when you want it, so long as you keep paying the price. There are four groups where you may think that there are two groups, and I am going to offer a word or two of wisdom on this point: http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." If you think that there are two groups, you are thinking in terms that are too simple. A. Capitalists B. Socialists There are at least four groups, and you may see why it is important to know all four groups, not just two groups, for your own good. A. Involuntary Capitalists (criminals) B. Involuntary Socialists (criminals) C. Voluntary Capitalists (Honest productive Americans) D. Voluntary Socialists (Honest productive Americans) You may now think that I have wandered way off of the subject of free electricity given away in order to inspire people to buy into electric powered transportation. I can get back to that eventually. Suppose all the people who belong in group A, all the capitalist criminals, every one of them, moved to one State, within a working Federated Democratic Republic. Suppose that U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) was a working Federated Democratic Republic (it isn't, but just suppose that it is), and so, within that working Federated Democratic Republic we can pick a state to be one that belongs to group A. How about New Jersey? I was born in New Jersey. Suppose that all the Involuntary Capitalists from all over America moved to New Jersey, and since they are criminals, they lie to each other, and they threaten each other, and they use violence against each other, so as to move each other, by that method, to New Jersey. Eventually all of them do move to New Jersey. Next, for this illustrative narrative, the second group, the Involuntary Socialists, migrate to another State in the working Federated Democratic Republic, and since this group is also criminal, they also move each other by way of lies, threats of violence, and violence, and any other way that works for them, because that is how they choose to do things, and they all travel from all corners of the working Federated Democratic Republic, known as America, and they all settle in California, where I live right now. I'm now surrounded by Involuntary Socialists everywhere I look, and there isn't even one Involuntary Capitalist left in the whole State of California, not even Arnold, the Govornator. So now you have two separate and distinct, competitive, groups of people, who occupy two separate, and distinct, States in the working Federated Democratic Republic, whereby all the Criminal Capitalists moved to New Jersey, and all the Criminal Socialists moved to California. What happens to all the Voluntary Socialists and all the Voluntary Capitalists? Suppose they also vote with their feet, too, and all the Voluntary Socialists ask each other to volunteer to move to Utah, and they do, willingly, voluntarily, they just do it, they all eventually end up in Utah, because that is where all the Voluntary Socialists decide to go, as one homogeneous group of like minded individuals. Suppose the same thing happens with the Voluntary Capitalist group, as all the Voluntary Capitalists, all at once, welcome each other, and volunteer to pick a State to move to, within the working Federated Democratic Republic, and every one of the Voluntary Capitalists willfully separate from the Involuntary Socialists, separate from the Voluntary Socialists, and even separate from their close friends the Involuntary Capitalists, and all the Voluntary Capitalists move to Texas. I. Federated Democratic Republic A. New Jersey (State of the Criminal Capitalists) B. California (State of the Criminal Socialists) C. Utah (State of the Voluntary Socialists) D. Texas (State of the Voluntary Capitalists) Please use your brain for a moment, if you have one, one that works, and use what experience you have, and what knowledge you have, and begin visualizing how those States would become examples of what they are if they are filled with a steady supply of those types of people within each of those states. I will offer a brief description. A. New Jersey (State of the Criminal Capitalists) Power flows from the many power-less submissive corporate stock buyer groups to the one power-full dominant corporate stock seller group and the one power-full dominant group uses that power flowing in that direction to keep that power flowing in that direction, by limiting the production of power to a manageable level, so as to make power scarce, and so as to seize the power to demand whatever price for power they alone can demand, and the power-less submissive groups will pay that price, or leave, or die. The dominant group will produce a false advertisement campaign whereby the dominant group claims to be capitalists, when in fact they are criminals, and the power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist groups eagerly believe in the lies, as they are led to believe that the only alternative to the life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victim is a worse life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victim, and, dangled just out of the reach of the power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victims, is, just within reach if you can afford the price, the promise of becoming a member of the power-full dominant group, within the Criminal Capitalist State, and the price of admission, into that power-full dominant group, is to consume, eat, use up, expend, and exploit, any other member of that criminal group, and do so more efficiently than any other member of that group. B. California (Sate of the Criminal Socialists) Power flows from the many power-less submissive government tax payer groups to the one power-full dominant government tax collector group and the one power-full dominant government group uses that power flowing in that direction to keep power flowing in that direction, by limiting the production of power to a manageable level, so as to make power scarce, and so as to seize the power to demand whatever price for power they alone can demand, and the power-less submissive groups will pay that price, or leave, or die. The dominant group will produce a false advertisement campaign whereby the dominant group claims to be socialist, when in fact they are criminals, and the power-less submissive Criminal Socialist groups eagerly believe in the lies, as they are led to believe that the only alternative to the life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victim is a worse life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victim, and, dangled just out of the reach of the power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victims, is, just within reach if you can afford it, is the promise of becoming a member of the power-full dominant group, within the Criminal Socialist State, and the price of admission, into that power-full dominant group, is to consume, eat, use up, expend, and exploit, any other member of that criminal group, and do so more efficiently than any other member of that group. C. Utah (State of the Voluntary Socialists) Voluntary members are encouraged to invest portions of their excess power, or surplus wealth, to a central fund, something similar to an insurance policy, so as to reap the reward, the return on investment, of a social benefit, in whatever form the fund is used, or spent, including such things as building roads, building hospitals, employing specialized workers who specialize in helping people avoid victimization by criminals, building things that make more power than the power consumed in the process of making power, and any other possible investment invented and proposed of which the many voluntary members will agree to invest. If the idea is agreeable there will be more, and many, investors, and if the idea is not agreeable, there will be less, and few investors, including those investors who do not want to invest in something that benefits non-investors at the same time that something benefits investors. More investors agreeing to an idea makes the idea more powerful, less investors agreeing to an idea makes an idea less powerful, and therefore there will be a demand to produce higher quality ideas, at lower costs, as the honest productive members are not victimized by a criminal power that has the power to limit power down to a manageable level, as the honest productive members are thereby not so limited in producing power, the power supply increases inversely proportional to the power that would be wasted in the work of enforcing the criminal method, and the honest productive people actually have the power to invest, or not invest, because the power they produce is not taken, and then used to make them suffer. D. Texas (State of the Voluntary Capitalists) Voluntary members are encouraged to invest portions of their excess power, or surplus wealth, to a central fund, something similar to a stock purchase, so as to reap the reward, the return on investment, of a capital benefit, in whatever form the fund is used, or spent, including such things as building roads, building hospitals, employing specialized workers who specialize in helping people avoid victimization by criminals, building things that make more power than the power consumed in the process of making power, and any other possible investment invented and proposed of which the many voluntary members will agree to invest. If the idea is agreeable there will be more, and many, investors, and if the idea is not agreeable, there will be less, and few investors, including those investors who want to invest in something that benefits the investors as well as benefiting the non-investors because generosity is an investment according to their own voluntary sense of right and wrong. More investors agreeing to an idea makes the idea more powerful, less investors agreeing to an idea makes an idea less powerful, and therefore there will be a demand to produce higher quality ideas, at lower costs, as the honest productive members are not victimized by a criminal power that has the power to limit power down to a manageable level, as the honest productive members are thereby not so limited in producing power, the power supply increases inversely proportional to the power that would be wasted in the work of enforcing the criminal method, and the honest productive people actually have the power to invest, or not invest, because the power they produce is not taken, and then used to make them suffer. Now that you have an idea, your own idea, or my offering, as to what constitutes the differences between the four political and economic categories, you can begin to further imagine what the character of each separate and distinct State in the working Federated Democratic Republic will become as they develop over time. Both of the criminally constituted States will consume themselves, or begin to conduct aggressive wars for profit outside of the working Federated Democratic Republic, and there is precedence for both in American history. Precedences: A. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is consuming itself right now. B. Massachusetts conducted aggressive wars for profit under The Articles of Confederation (a working Federated Democratic Republic) into Canada, failing to profit from the venture, leading to Shays's Rebellion, as the legal criminals running the Involuntary Legal Crime State, of Massachusetts, tried to steal the surplus wealth from the tax payers through a banking monopoly and tax scheme - a well documented fact. Both of the voluntary constituted States will not be limited by a legal crime power that willfully governs down the production of power and therefore the production of power within those voluntarily constituted States will grow powerful by that measure precisely: power not consumed in the work of governing down the production of power will not be consumed in the work of governing down the production of power. Power invested competitively will, by that precise measure, add to the increase of power produced within the voluntarily constituted States. Power traded, equitably, between the two voluntarily constituted States accelerates the increase of power gained by the voluntarily constituted States for the same reasons that trade works on any level between any number of people who voluntarily trade, equitably, to the benefit of each voluntary trader, whereby specialization, division of labor, and economies of scale work as similarly as a lever, or wheel, or pulley works as a mechanical advantage in mechanics - or physics. Power traded, inequitably, between the two involuntarily constituted States decelerates the increase of power lost by the involuntarily constituted States as each involuntary trader employs deception, false advertisements, fine print, hidden costs, dirty deals, fraud, extortion, threats of violence, acts of violence, etc., to gain at the expense of each other trader, in the effort to exploit each other, using up scarce power, that their Involuntary State Constitutions make scarce, in the useless, power-less, and destructive, expense of defending against their own self-created hell on Earth. The involuntary constituted States fail to reach agreeable, and mutually beneficial, associations, because that is their chosen method of operating, a power-less method, when compared to a voluntary constituted State arrangement. You, being what you are, may imagine yourself migrating, voting with your feet, to one of the four separate and distinct States illustrated above, or, failing to construct such a desirable State, you have no choice but to continue struggling within an obviously involuntarily constituted State, within this Corporate Nation State, which is a legal fiction, and one that is "Limited" in "liability", which means, without all the smoke and mirrors, that crime does pay, and it pays handsomely here in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Crime pays here because here, in legal crime country, society is run by criminals who pay themselves whatever they want, when they want, because they have your power, and you no longer have your power, you have been had, get used to it, or do something about it. When the victims have had enough, when they can no longer afford the bill, the victims will no longer be victims, the point at which victimization is no longer affordable, approaches, and then either the victims will resort to crime, to survive, or they will access the power of voluntary association - in each case, for each individual. A dead victim is no longer a victim, tortured to death, or murdered quickly, the same result applies. There is power in numbers, productive, or destructive. A. Become a criminal B. Die a miserable death as a victim for life C. Cut the link between you and the criminals, by some means, including the means by which you connect to honest productive people voluntarily and access the power of numbers, and gain enough power, by that method, to represent, and present, a powerful deterrent, sufficient to discourage crime, making crime no longer profitable as a lucrative means of making a living. When the honest productive people associate effectively among themselves, by whatever means they invent, and when they learn to disconnect from the criminals who produce and maintain involuntary associations, with lies, with threats of violence, and with acts of violence, then the power of numbers can begin to work exponentially, as one volunteer welcomes another volunteer, making two, and then two welcome two more, making four, and then eight, and then sixteen, and then more, and then more, and more volunteers connect voluntarily, and less criminals gain access to fewer victims, and the fewer criminals have only other criminals to exploit, and the criminals soon have no choice but to volunteer to associate, get a real job, or starve, or depend upon charity, because at that point, crime no longer pays, not legally, not in reality, because their fantasy is no longer believed by enough people to make living Hell real. Game over for the criminals among us. At that point, seriously, do you think that honest productive people would send their son's and daughter's, and their hard earned surplus wealth, to torture, and mass murder, or be tortured, or murdered, for oil, or for control of legal monopoly money power, or for whatever Hellish vision imaginable, or, instead, would the honest productive people choose something more powerful, and something less expensive, like filling up your car with electricity, 80% cheaper than gasoline, or for free, while you work at a job whereby you keep the power you produce?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri May 20th, 2011 01:12 pm |
|
11th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, I listened to Alex Jones and Dr. Steve Pieczenik. 1. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) 2. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford the interest payments on the dollar currency debt 3. Many people in America don't have jobs My take on these things, my angle of view, is unique, as unique as anyone else's, and I can offer my unique angle of view to those who may want a competitive one to compare to their own, or anyone else's. The two products I enumerated previously help to illustrate my unique viewpoint, and those two products allow anyone else to view my unique viewpoint from their own perspective. Take problem 1 for example, and see if you can follow along with the unique viewpoint that the two products offer to you. Problem 1: U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) You can substitute any word in place of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) if you prefer not to use my unique term, if that is a problem for you as the process moves along. If you have product 1 and product 2 you may be able to afford another war in Pakistan, added to the wars that you may or may not be able to afford in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Mexico, The Drug war, The War on Terror, and whatever other war you may or may not be able to afford. Product 1 may cut your monthly mortgage payment in half, so you can afford more, more wars, if that is what you want, since you now have more power kept at home, and less power sent to the mortgage company, or sent to whomever owns your steady stream of surplus wealth. You can substitute any word in place of surplus wealth, if that is a problem for you, and you can replace that unique term of mine with the word earnings, or the word money, or any word that works for you. You earn money, you send money to someone, each month, unless you don't have a mortgage, which is your unique situation, and if that is your unique situation, you can stop reading, or you can imagine someone who does have a mortgage, or you can imagine 100 million Americans who have mortgages, or any number imaginable, so long as you keep in mind that the problem is that wars are unaffordable to someone. If you have a choice, which you don't, you could choose to opt out of one, or all, of the wars conducted by U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), fill in your own word, the wars are occurring, and someone ordered them, and many follow those orders, willingly, or unwillingly, wars are occurring, and someone does pay for them, and someone, obviously, profits from them, following the money, such as the money trail known as Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, offers an accurate account of the money trail. Are you on the list of people who receive a copy of the local or state or federal Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, like the Phone Book, are you on the list to get a free copy? No? You may yet have a mortgage that you are not up to speed on, if you don't have a home, or business, mortgage. Here is the grand total: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You may have your surplus wealth safely hidden off shore. I don't know anything about you, and I think that is nice if you do have your power secured somehow. Product one, the no interest home mortgage, denominated in a competitive currency, not dollars, not the dollars produced and maintained by The Federal Reserve people, offered to you, cuts your interest payments out of your mortgage, and what do you get for that product, once you get it? Nothing. You still have to pay off your home, you don't pay off someone else's home, a fictitious home, a nebulous home denominated in dollar interest. So now, from this perspective of now having a no interest product 1 mortgage loan, for your home, and for your business, or for a new home, or for a new business property, or both, you are in a different position to judge the number one problem spelled out above as: Problem 1: U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) You still work, you still pay off your home, and your business mortgage, if you have any, but now you don't send interest payments to wherever you are sending interest payments, and so whomever is receiving all that interest is no longer receiving all that interest, and it may not be the same thing as the National Interest, but it may be the same thing, you don't know, I think it is, but we don't know, unless we follow the money very carefully, and the point here is the point out that not sending it in the first place, may be a good place to start fixing problems. Do you need a new roof? Do you need a job? Will lowering your monthly expenses help? Will a job opportunity help? Did you see what product 2 is meant to accomplish? Product 2 offers the voter, vote for me, vote for product 2, vote for, a product 2 loan at 1 percent interest, to start a new electricity generating business, at home. The laws just changed here in California, and you may now be able to afford to invest your own credit in the work of moving solar panels to your home so as to use that investment in the work of producing enough surplus electricity to begin receiving money in exchange for the electricity you produce and sell from your home and from your business property. If you can find and have installed the solar panels affordably, then, you will not only pay off your new loan, a low interest loan, you will also have more cash flowing in by your entrepreneurial employment of your own good credit. That is the way that works. Not only do you lower your expenses, by cutting out the middle man, removing the blood sucking mortgage interest payments, wiping them from your earth, you also begin using your own good credit, profitably, for yourself, by competing with all the other electric power producers on the grid. The quality of electricity is easy to maintain, electricity is either good enough, or not good enough, as it goes through your meter into the grid. The more you invest, the more you make, and the sky is the limit, it takes money to make money, and you don't have any, until someone decides that it is past time to take our money back from the criminals. Once we decide to take our money back from the criminals, we can compete with their money, and it will be easy to win that competition, since their money is very poor stuff, for us, very good stuff for them, and the tune of that inequity is obvious, and well documented: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You can also use product 2 to buy a new electric car, or two, and even start a taxi business, or a delivery business. You can even use product 2 to buy a modular green house vertical farming unit, or a regular farm, at 1 percent interest, and begin producing your own powerful food, for use, and for sale, if you want. What happens to problem 1? 1. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) Once you are back on your feet, you have command of your own good faith and credit, and you no longer send piles of your power to never-never-land, you can more accurately judge if, or if not, you can afford another war. How about a war on falsehood? How about affording the war that uncovers all the lies, and accounts for all the criminals, in all those other wars that profit a select, and exclusive few, at the great expense of the many? How about moving onto problem 2? 2. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford the interest payments on the dollar currency debt Those who receive profit, in whatever form profit is received, do not see problem 2 as a problem. So long as the power keeps on flowing in the direction desired, the problem is not a problem, the problem is their solution, their final solution if need be, so long as the power flows in that direction, there is no problem. If you don't like the term U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) use a better term for you. Do you receive any benefits as you send dollars to the place you send dollars? Why do dollars flow in the direction that dollars flow if you don't receive any benefits? Try collecting something. I did. I ran into a serious health bump in the road, and I would have had to become a professional benefit collector to get a drop of the investment money I sent, for 25 years, into the social security apparatus. I'm 53. I went all the way to a judge. I sat low in a low seat. The judge sat high, in a high seat. It was un-American. Americans may have to resort to begging on the path that America is on. I'm not there yet. I think there is time left to turn this thing around. The dollar is one form of currency. The dollar debt is exclusive to the dollar form of currency. When the producers of the dollar have no more use for the dollar they will no longer use it. Why should you? Do you have a brain? Is it time that you use your brain? Product 1 and Product 2 allow Americans to wean off of their dollar habit, by entering a new age of monetary competition, where either the dollar producers pony up, or they go out of business, to bad for them, it is time to move your assets. The legal criminals will move their assets in a heartbeat. Why should you not have that option? Ignorance? Apathy? Brainwashing? Carelessness? There is a religious saying. How does that go? Give Ceasar that which is Ceasars? I'll look it up. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+22%3A15-22&version=NIV So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s I think God is Truth, and that is as far as my belief in religion has progressed to date. If the fraudulent money is your choice, good luck with it. I suppose you have a reason for choosing it. If something equitable is a choice, why not take that choice instead? Criminals will choose criminal money. If there is a choice given to the victims, will they choose to be victims? Will they choose to be fellow criminals? What happens when the number of victims can no longer afford so many criminals? Product 1 and product 2 allow the observer to view the choice I'm trying to convey to you. You can choose to ignore my viewpoint. How about problem 3? 3. Many people in America don't have jobs Hire criminals to rob you, and what happens to your power to hire anyone else?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon May 23rd, 2011 11:34 am |
|
12th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.cnbc.com/id/43127960/Gold_silver_coins_to_be_legal_currency_in_UtahHis idea isn't to return to the gold standard, when the dollar was backed by gold instead of government goodwill. Instead, he just wanted to create options for consumers. A legal money monopoly power is either global or a legal money monopoly power is national and therefore it is a competition between a nation with one national money monopoly power versus other nations with other national money monopoly powers, and therefore each nation is an internal legal money monopoly power versus internal competition, internal, where the people running the national monopoly will make internal competition against the law. The legal national money monopoly power will fine, or punish, or prosecute, or tax, or weakened by law, all internal competition to the national legal money monopoly power, so as to subsidize or strengthen the national legal money monopoly power, so that the national money monopoly power becomes an internal monopoly, because all the internal competition is destroyed, crushed, and rendered powerless by the willful actions of the people running the national legal money monopoly power. Externally there will be either competition or combination, a cartel, or cabal. 1. Competition (whereby the force of voluntary choice forces quality up and cost down) 2. Monopoly (whereby the force of deceit, threats of violence, and violence forces an end to competition) Competition is the force that forces quality up and cost down, as consumers choose the higher quality stuff, and as consumers choose the lower cost stuff, and the competitors who are offering the consumers higher quality stuff, at a lower cost, gain more customers, the better competitor gains more market share, while the lower quality competitor goes out of business, as the lower quality stuff, at a higher cost, sits on the shelf, no one buys it, or fewer and fewer people buy the lower quality stuff at a higher cost, depending upon how bad the lower quality stuff is compared to the higher quality stuff, and depending upon how much more expensive the lower quality stuff is compared to the affordable high quality stuff; so long as the consumers are well aware of the facts concerning what is and what is not high quality, and what is, and what is not, affordable. When a competitor takes control away from a legal money monopoly power the change from a monopoly to a working competition is called a revolution. A revolution occurs inside a nation when the legal money monopoly power is usurped, taken over, weakened, made less powerful, destroyed, ended, gone, removed, and when the regime of a long standing reign of legal monopoly money terror ends, it is peacefully ended by a revolution of choice, a revolution of competition, and a revolution by which the force of competition is no longer criminalized by the legal monopoly money terror regime. The people then pick the higher quality money, at the lower cost, and the lower quality money at a higher cost goes out of business. The legal criminals have to get real jobs, where they have to please the customers, instead of having the victims obey every command dictated by the monopoly power dictators, at their exclusive pleasure. 1. Competition (power commanded by the people) 2. Dictatorship (exclusive, monopoly, power) The Federal Reserve System of fraud, national legal money monopoly power reign of terror, goes out of business, peacefully, quietly, and irreversibly, as the people then know the power they always had, the power that was stolen, the power to use their own power to choose better instead of worse, better instead of the lesser of two evils (bad money or no money), and free and open, fair and equitable, competition, instead of fraudulent, threatening, and violent legal money monopoly crime reign of terror by the current long standing regime. Gone is this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ The link at the top of the page illustrates the force of competition that eliminates the legal money monopoly power of destruction that is reported in the debt clock link. There are other examples of how legal choice, legal competition, removes the power to monopolize money, and weakens the power that the few have as the few steal the power of the many, and then the few use that stolen power to keep stealing from the many, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of terrible violence. Here are two more illustrated examples of how the many regain the power of competition over the monopolistic few: http://www.umungu.com/scrip.htm http://utopianist.com/2011/01/stimulus-writ-small-tiny-california-town-prints-its-own-currency/ The concept is simple. A monopoly power is a power that dictates the quality and cost of the stuff that the monopoly power produces, and the consumers have no choice but to buy, or consume, the monopoly power products, by definition, that is the definition of a monopoly power. On the other hand there is competition, which is a competitive choice when compared to no choice. 1. Obey 2. Choose something better Example: Today the U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) group of people claim to lord over a world monopoly power that has been called The Dollar Hegemony, You must use dollars, you have no choice, and many people are being forced to use dollars, to buy oil, to gain access to world markets. These are words that are reporting facts, you can look into the facts yourself, and you can use whichever words you prefer to use to describe the facts. Soon The Dollar Hegemony will no longer be the global monopoly power and it is likely that the new global monopoly power will shift to China, and that shift may occur after World War III, even if you don't like it, even if you prefer not to contemplate it, even if you think anyone suggesting it is to be ignored by you, at any cost, to anyone but you, and the point here is to point out what can happen after the shift of world legal money monopoly power shifts from The Dollar Hegemony to China in relation to the force of competition. A. Enforced world reserve currency (by any other name it is the same thing, if it is American based, it is the same thing, if it is based in China, it is the same thing) B. Competition forcing higher quality and lower costs (not a monopoly maintained by deceit, threats of violence, and acts of vicious and terrible violence) If World War III happens, and if all life on Earth isn't destroyed as an "unintended consequence", and if China is where the world legal money monopoly power people shift their base of operations, then the people within U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) will be in the position that the people in China are in now, and the people in China will be in the position that the people in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are in now. They (The Chinese) will be the reigning world legal money monopoly power and we (U.S.A. Inc. LLC) will be the lesser legal money power. What does that mean? The question has four parts. 1. What does the shift of power from The Dollar Hegemony mean for the select few who control the issue of The Dollar Hegemony money - The Dollar? 2. What does the shift of power to The Chinese Hegemony mean for the select few who control the issue of the Chinese Hegemony money - no longer The Dollar? 3. What does the shift of power from The Dollar Hegemony mean for the people within the legal boundaries of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), those who do not control the issue of The Dollar? 4. What does the shift of power to The Chinese Hegemony mean for the people within the legal boundaries of China, those who do not control the issue of the new world monopoly money power? If we, the people of America, want access to world markets then we have to pay them, the people who issue to new world reserve monopoly currency money in China, they, the people in China, no longer have to pay the few who run The Dollar Hegemony. It is that simple, and it is that complex, because complexity is produced so as to cover up the simple truth. The honest productive people in America, and the honest productive people in China, always get the short end of the stick, and the few people who run the legal money monopoly confidence schemes always get the power that is created by the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals use that stolen power to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use deceit to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use torture to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use mass murder to perpetuate the crime in progress, and that, in one word, is war, and it has been, and it will be, world war, by any other name, the screams of agony, and the piles of innocent dead people measure the same thing, over, and over, and over again, until such time as the victims own up to their own lethal part in the dirty business cycle. If you do not understand that, then you are ignorant. That is the hard fact, read it and weep, or whatever reaction you suffer once you know the truth, just know it. The point about competition can be pointed out competitively and it can be done so long as the reader keeps in mind the above scenarios. A. Present situation with The Dollar Hegemony reigning over The Worlds Reserve Currency and in so doing all competitors have to pay The Dollar Hegemony to gain access to world markets, in particular the oil markets. B. Future situation with The Chinese Hegemony reigning over The worlds Reserve Currency and in so doing all competitors have to pay The Chinese Hegemony to gain access to world markets, in particular the oil markets. What happens in either case if any country, or any city, or any county, or any state, anywhere on earth, if the people running the law power in that city, county, state, republic, or nation, allow either money to be used, The U.S. Dollar, or The Chinese Dollar, just those two, instead of just one? What happens? If you are going to understand this you have to get on a personal level with it. You can legally choose to be paid in U.S. Dollars or Chinese Dollars. You are legally forced to accept either U.S. Dollars, or Chinese Dollars, by laws in your city, county, state, nation, republic, and world. Instead of no choice, which is what you have now, you have 2 choices, instead of monopoly force working against you, you have the force of competition working for you. What happens to this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/? What happens to that, that debt clock, when competition is a force of law, instead of monopoly being a force of law, and get personal with the concept, know it, be it, realize it, yourself. A few possible situations arise: A. Those who want their money to collect interest pick the money they want, while those who don't want to have to pay interest pick the money they want, and which money takes over more customers than the other money? Which do you pick, when you have a choice? B. Those who want their money to be more powerful, to buy more, for less, pick the more powerful money, and those who want their money to buy less, to be the less powerful money pick the less powerful money, and which money takes over more customers? Which money is your choice because of your personal reasons for choosing your better money? C. The Chinese Dollar makers, producers, printers, and maintainers make a deal with the U.S. Dollar producers to make their moneys the same, so that there is no longer any difference, they are one and the same money, with different ink patterns printed, virtually the same money, so there is no longer a choice. Do you now look for a competitive money since the two legal choices have become one monopoly power (like republicans and democrats becoming republocrats or demilicans). You have to make this personal, pick a money, which do you pick today? Logically you pick the money that works best for you today, and you may pick The Dollar Hegemony, World Reserve Currency Money, today, because The World Reserve Currency is based in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) and that is also where you live, so that is what you choose to do, and you have no idea why anyone else would pick the Chinese stuff. You go with the flow, until it become obvious that the flow is changing course, and then you go with that flow. Now it is the reign of The Dollar Hegemony, and there is a score board for it: The Debt Clock denominated in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) units of money: dollars. Time goes by, World War III goes by, perhaps it was less than expected, the human beings are still alive, and now you have the same choice, but now the World Reserve Currency Money is Chinese money, and now more people are choosing the Chinese stuff, here in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and in China, the flow of power is flowing from The Dollar to the competition, in a big way. Now what do you choose, if you have a choice? Why do they choose The Chinese money once the Chinese money becomes the world reserve currency, and once the shoe is on the other foot? You have to make this personal. 1. Do you want more for less? 2. If you have a choice will you choose less for more? 3. Will you willingly, knowingly, and, with malice aforethought, choose more for you at the expense of someone else? All the supposed legal mumbo jumbo, the fine print, the expert testimony, and the authoritative commentary about money, legal or not, is smoke and mirrors, and it is meant to hide the truth from the victims. If you have the choice, which you don't, you will pick the path that you can afford instead of picking the path that you cannot afford - once you know the truth. Look, please, please, please, at the link that reports to you the path that you cannot afford: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You have to make this personal, because it is personal, and if you do not make this personal, despite the fact that other people have made this personal, you will suffer as a result, you will remain a victim, the next generation will remain victims, and the legal criminals reign of terror will perpetuate, and the result may well be the extinction of all life on earth.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 26th, 2011 11:34 pm |
|
13th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
05-26-2011 Anyone, There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between two opposing forces that you may call The Federal Government and The People of Texas. I am speaking about the current events involving the Texas State Senate, as some of the members of that legal group aided and abetted, giving legal support, to the people in TSA, where the people in TSA have been, are, and will be guilty of injuring innocent victims. You can continue to call the power struggle a battle between The Federal Government and The People of Texas; I will not do such a service to the legal criminals, and I will not abandon the innocent victims by failing in that manner. I will call the legal criminals what they are; I will call the legal criminals what they define themselves to be, by their actions, if not by their willful, honest, confessions. If you hire liars, you must want lies. There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between the Legal Criminals and the honest productive people of America. This chapter unfolding now is one episode; and it is quite possibly similar to a small earthquake, and one that indicates an impending larger earthquake, since the last time this type of battle occurred, has been well over a century. I think that the honest productive people may well learn from that history; and learn the lesson well. I will make this as brief as possible. Agriculture began as an exponential increase in the power to create surplus wealth among cooperative (meaning honest, productive, people, worthy of trust) people, to such a degree, that Pyramids could be made with such a huge increase in economic power gained through agriculture. Agriculture also offered many forms of currency, or money, such as water flowing through channels, from central locations, through gates, and onto farming fields. Another form of currency was invented, produced, and used, whereby excess food was harvested at many individual farms and then transported on roads to central locations, and depositors of food where then issued records of their deposits. The records of deposits, or receipts, served as tax records, and as money, or monetary currency. If money doesn't flow, it is not currency. If it doesn't flow it has only potential power. If money has no power, to purchase, it isn't money. If you have none, you can't play. If you have no water, you can't farm. How much will you pay for water, if you have none? When individual members of the honest and productive group were known to be destructive, the rest of the group could, as a means of exclusion, cut off the supply of currency to the destructive people. What happens when the destructive people gain control over the supply of currency? The answer is abundantly clear to anyone who cares to know the truth. Example: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is a modern day version of farmers sending their power to the central location, making the farmers weaker, and making the people running the show powerful enough to order, a Pyramid or two, or three, or an aggressive war for profit, or four, or a squad of goons to make sure that the flow of power keeps flowing in that exclusive direction. Stop reading my confusing words, since I speak a different language. I speak facts, just not the ones people want to hear. Read this instead: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0230602576/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=1151480835&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1KX1CSSV22HZTD46JEGZ Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy I'll get my copy and quote some from that book; after a few comments. The honest productive people got away from the legal criminals, more or less, as they migrated to North America, encountering cultural conflicts with the natives, but overall getting out from under the thumb of the King of England, and out from under the control of the English monetary system of fraud, taxation without representation. etc. The honest productive people still had legal criminals among them, they always will, but the honest productive people made their own money system, honest money, productive money, powerful money, useful money, equitable money, two-way money, not one-way money. The honest productive people began to construct their own forms of government modeled after the Swiss Republican System, which was a Federated Democratic Republic, which managed to maintain separate and sovereign legal entities, or States, within a Federated, voluntary, Union. Each State had their own constitutions, there was even a State called Franklin, named after Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin even wrote one of the constitutions of the time period. I would like to see a copy. The State of Franklin was not accepted at first, and by the time the State was accepted into the Union, the Union became a National, involuntary Union, by way of fraud, and by that time the State was named Kentucky, The honest productive people, in each separate and sovereign State, made things official, with a document called The Declaration of Independence, and the leaders of the time set about defending their official declaration of independence, which was a way of saying to the King, you think you own us, we do not. The King sent many ships, many conscripted soldiers, many mercenaries, and the honest productive people got help from the French. An effort was made to drive the criminals out of North America, by an all volunteer army, under an experimental voluntary union of separate, liberated, voluntary, unionized, legal fictions, or States. The all volunteer Army, under Washington, and other less famous leaders, and with the help of the French, drove out the British legal criminals - wining the so called war for independence. It was more like a police action to me. Criminals don't obey moral law, including the ones they enforce. Voluntary armies deputize themselves with the power to enforce moral laws, such as helping little children as little children are being molested by TSA agents with badges, and claims of authority; whereby they claim to have the authority to molest little children. They don't call it molestation, that would amount to a confession of guilt, and then the criminals would loose their cover story; they aren't the sharpest tool in the box, but they do get paid to molest children, so, they can't be too stupid, in their own measure. You pay them, what does that say about you? You pay them to molest children. People don't like reading what I have to say. It isn't a mystery to me. So the honest productive people drove the criminals out, and then went back to work. Soon a new home grown group of legal criminals emerged in Massachusetts, and the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic was tested. One state began playing with dishonest money, using the stolen power, stolen from the only place power can be stolen from (other than from other criminals), which is the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals in Massachusetts began using the stolen power to commit aggressive wars for profit, against natives, and against Canadians. The legal criminals lost, they lost all the money, they didn't get the booty, and they raised the taxes, and they inflated the currency, which drove out the gold, and then, as legal criminals are apt to do, they outlawed the monetary competition, which was Whiskey, yes, Whiskey was the go-to-money of the day, which people could make at home, to use as money to buy other things, in the absence of gold, or better money, such as stamp script. The genius of the Federated Democratic Republic began to take shape when the rebels who fought the war for independence against the British legal criminal monetary frauds. then took up arms again to fight the home grown legal criminals monetary frauds running Massachusetts; which was still legal, it was still legal to rebel against a criminal government, how could it not be legal to Declare Independence - who undeclared it? The beauty of the Federated Democratic Republic was such that the people running The Articles of Confederation were not inclined, legally, to aid and abet, and give legal support, or even material support, to either side in the internal conflict in Massachusetts. The legal criminals won. The rebels who won the first war for independence, lost the second one, but all was not lost, except for all the casualties, but all was not lost for the survivors, who voted with their feet, and moved to Vermont. The victorious legal criminals in Massachusetts petitioned the leaders of the legal fiction known as Vermont, to hand over their runaway slaves, hell, they owned them after all, but, and again the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic shows up, the leaders of Vermont didn't hand over the free men who voted with their feet by moving out of the criminal state of Massachusetts and moving to the not as criminal, or perhaps even liberated State, of Vermont, all nice and tidy within the experimental Federated Democratic Republic under The Articles of Confederation. I am keeping this short, hell, I have to edit it. Liberty is not handed down on a silver platter, even if you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth. Someone mined the silver. Me nephew offers a quote he heard: He was born on 3rd base and he thinks he has hit a triple. The home grown legal criminals knew what was up, how could they not, their gravy train, their fast track to monetary nirvana, their monopoly, threw a rod. Their motor seized. The damn experiment works, the legal criminals' goose was cooked, the golden egg wasn't, it was a turd - to them. They had to do something. They did this: http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 They posed as Federalists. They claimed that The Debt had to be paid. Does that sound familiar? They were Nationalists, and Monarchists, and criminals. And they claimed to be against mob rule. And in order to get their "Constitution" ratified they appealed to the mob, with lies, with fabrications, with claims of noble intent, and they threw out a working Federated Democratic Republic and placed, in place, a Nation State, and their "Constitution" enabled all that it's opponents warned it would create. The ratification process included the already mentioned fraud, false advertizements, appealing to the mob, and a Dirty Compromise between the industrial Northern legal criminals and the agricultural southern legal criminals to divide the spoils of their victory over the honest productive people, including the black slaves, who were then legally bound to be returned to their owners upon request, anywhere within the newly formed Nation State. Many honest productive people were duped into believing in the lies produced by the Nationalists, the same nationalists who were hiding behind a thin veil of "Federalism". One of the dupes, taken in by the fraud, was a person named James Madison. James Madison jumped sides as quickly as George Washington; and I can explain, because this is important and relevant to current events; as the power struggle continues between the legal criminals (TSA, and their employers) and the opposition: the honest productive people (always the targets of the legal criminals). James Madison was the perfect dupe; as he wrote all the right things, to help convince the honest productive people (the mob, the rabble, the majority, the people, the tax payers) that the "Constitution" was going to be a better experimental Federated Democratic Republic, which it was categorically not, it was a Nation State, by design, it was a consolidated government, and it was tailored to be misconstrued, it was an enabler, it enabled plausible deniability, it could be constructively interpreted, on purpose. James Madison later grew a conscious, sufficient enough to admit error, and he then set about to oppose the people who were then constructively interpreting the consolidated government enabler, as James Madison then authored roughly half of The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. That is in the book I linked; you can stop reading my unwelcome text and read that book, and profit from the investment, or return here and blame me for your wasted effort. Please do. Back at the story line whereby Washington, having led the fight to oppose the British Monarchy, system of monetary fraud, and legal crime, complete with wars of aggression for profit, and all the crimes that spring for from that one, Washington, once enabled to do the contrary, changing sides, authored the following: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html King George: And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit; The Spirit George crushed was the same spirit within The Declaration of Independence, it was the Spirit of 1776. George assembled a conscript army, named The Watermelon Army, reportedly as large as the one he led to enforce liberty, and George took that army into Pennsylvania, a formerly separate and sovereign state, and crushed the second Whiskey Rebellion; whereby the new monetary frauds (Alexander Hamilton for example) were playing the same fraudulent monetary game, moving surplus wealth out of the hands of the people who create it, and into the hands of the people who steal it, and when the victims invent their own replacement currency, again Whiskey, the monetary monopoly enforcers, with their legal enabling documents, crush the competition where ever, and when ever it arises. Just ask Alexander Hamilton; when you meet him in hell - if that is where you are headed. I'm may be going there too. I have yet to see the light - but I do look for it. After some very bad things, whereby the legal criminals, enabled with their enabling legal documents, their licenses to torture, and murder, and even worse crimes, in between Georges test case, crushing "so fatal a spirit" and in between that historical event and the inappropriately named Civil War, which was not civil by any measure, more slaves were created than were set free, unless death is a measure of freedom, hell, slaves didn't have to pay money tax before the war, they paid in work and hide, they were not set free, they just changed masters. Many slaves now are slaves to falsehood, including me. I am setting myself free - the only way to get free - with help. In between those two events, the crushing of the spirit of 1776, and the Not So Civil War, was The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the things I want you to read about. The things I just now tried to clue you in on pertain to The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, relative to current events, as the power struggle continues. On the one side of the power struggle in The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the honest productive people represented by James Madison, writing for the Kentucky legal fiction, and Thomas Jefferson writing for the Virginia legal fiction, formerly a separate and sovereign state within a working experimental Federated Democratic Republic, but then a subordinate, lesser, and relatively insignificant power, a subject of, the legal criminals running the Nation State legal fiction; with its plausibly deniable enabling documentation: The Constitution. The opposition to The Constitution also tried to lessen the defeat with The Bill or Rights. How are they working for you now? I'll get a relevant quote from the reference book, and then continue comments. If you have read this far, you will now see the relevance to current events - if you care to see.
Jackson was fully prepared to enforce a tax law. I can find it again, in the source book. Jackson was no stranger to violence as a supposed means of solving problems. In the summer of 1832, Congress passed a new tariff bill. The average rate was reduced to 25 percent of the value of the imported goods. However, rates on iron, woolens, and cottons remained at the 50 percent level. To make matters worse in the Carolinians' eyes, the national treasury expected to enjoy a surplus in the 1830s as a result of the retirement of the debt from the War of 1912. As much as they loathed protection, South Carolinians were willing to be taxed to pay their portion of the war debt. But with debt retirement on the horizon, the tariff became even more unpopular. In short: The Northern power used their influence over the Nation State to skew tax burden onto the Southern power, and the Southern power used their influence within their not-so-sovereign State to write enabling documents that included nullification of the National tax, and included a call to arms to defend against invasion by National troops ordered to enforce the tax. Troops assembled, reportedly, on both sides. Stepping back in time a moment: The Dirty Compromise, in 1788, so as to enable "The Constitution", was a momentary truce between the legal criminals of the North, and the legal criminals of the South. The Nation state enabled one power to annex (steal) the other power. The Constitution ensured a Civil War, that is a documented fact. A Nation State is not a working Federated Democratic Republic. Separate and Sovereign states can succeed from a voluntary union, if they cant' it isn't a voluntary union, it is a Consolidated Nation State, a legal monopoly power. Monopoly powers cannot exist in competition with other powers; competition is the opposite of monopoly. The existence of competition nullifies the existence of a monopoly - by definition. Competition forces quality up, and cost down, even governments, even money. Monopoly forces the opposite, go figure. Separate and Sovereign States define their state of sovereignty, fictionally speaking, as do human beings define their sovereignty, but literally speaking. When you are ordered to obey, and you do obey, even though you know that unqualified obedience is as wrong as the torture, and the mass murder, and the end of the species, that occurs on that path, then you define the opposite of sovereignty. You are a slave; but that isn't nice to know, so ignore it, while you can?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri May 27th, 2011 12:48 am |
|
14th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
05-26-2011 Anyone, There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between two opposing forces that you may call The Federal Government and The People of Texas. I am speaking about the current events involving the Texas State Senate, as some of the members of that legal group aided and abetted, giving legal support, to the people in TSA, where the people in TSA have been, are, and will be guilty of injuring innocent victims. You can continue to call the power struggle a battle between The Federal Government and The People of Texas; I will not do such a service to the legal criminals, and I will not abandon the innocent victims by failing in that manner. I will call the legal criminals what they are; I will call the legal criminals what they define themselves to be, by their actions, if not by their willful, honest, confessions. If you hire liars, you must want lies. There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between the Legal Criminals and the honest productive people of America. This chapter unfolding now is one episode; and it is quite possibly similar to a small earthquake, and one that indicates an impending larger earthquake, since the last time this type of battle occurred, has been well over a century. I think that the honest productive people may well learn from that history; and learn the lesson well. I will make this as brief as possible. Agriculture began as an exponential increase in the power to create surplus wealth among cooperative (meaning honest, productive, people, worthy of trust) people, to such a degree, that Pyramids could be made with such a huge increase in economic power gained through agriculture. Agriculture also offered many forms of currency, or money, such as water flowing through channels, from central locations, through gates, and onto farming fields. Another form of currency was invented, produced, and used, whereby excess food was harvested at many individual farms and then transported on roads to central locations, and depositors of food where then issued records of their deposits. The records of deposits, or receipts, served as tax records, and as money, or monetary currency. If money doesn't flow, it is not currency. If it doesn't flow it has only potential power. If money has no power, to purchase, it isn't money. If you have none, you can't play. If you have no water, you can't farm. How much will you pay for water, if you have none? When individual members of the honest and productive group were known to be destructive, the rest of the group could, as a means of exclusion, cut off the supply of currency to the destructive people. What happens when the destructive people gain control over the supply of currency? The answer is abundantly clear to anyone who cares to know the truth. Example: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is a modern day version of farmers sending their power to the central location, making the farmers weaker, and making the people running the show powerful enough to order, a Pyramid or two, or three, or an aggressive war for profit, or four, or a squad of goons to make sure that the flow of power keeps flowing in that exclusive direction. Stop reading my confusing words, since I speak a different language. I speak facts, just not the ones people want to hear. Read this instead: [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0230602576/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=1151480835&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1KX1CSSV22HZTD46JEGZ[/url] Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy I'll get my copy and quote some from that book; after a few comments. The honest productive people got away from the legal criminals, more or less, as they migrated to North America, encountering cultural conflicts with the natives, but overall getting out from under the thumb of the King of England, and out from under the control of the English monetary system of fraud, taxation without representation. etc. The honest productive people still had legal criminals among them, they always will, but the honest productive people made their own money system, honest money, productive money, powerful money, useful money, equitable money, two-way money, not one-way money. The honest productive people began to construct their own forms of government modeled after the Swiss Republican System, which was a Federated Democratic Republic, which managed to maintain separate and sovereign legal entities, or States, within a Federated, voluntary, Union. Each State had their own constitutions, there was even a State called Franklin, named after Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin even wrote one of the constitutions of the time period. I would like to see a copy. The State of Franklin was not accepted at first, and by the time the State was accepted into the Union, the Union became a National, involuntary Union, by way of fraud, and by that time the State was named Kentucky, The honest productive people, in each separate and sovereign State, made things official, with a document called The Declaration of Independence, and the leaders of the time set about defending their official declaration of independence, which was a way of saying to the King, you think you own us, we do not. The King sent many ships, many conscripted soldiers, many mercenaries, and the honest productive people got help from the French. An effort was made to drive the criminals out of North America, by an all volunteer army, under an experimental voluntary union of separate, liberated, voluntary, unionized, legal fictions, or States. The all volunteer Army, under Washington, and other less famous leaders, and with the help of the French, drove out the British legal criminals - wining the so called war for independence. It was more like a police action to me. Criminals don't obey moral law, including the ones they enforce. Voluntary armies deputize themselves with the power to enforce moral laws, such as helping little children as little children are being molested by TSA agents with badges, and claims of authority; whereby they claim to have the authority to molest little children. They don't call it molestation, that would amount to a confession of guilt, and then the criminals would loose their cover story; they aren't the sharpest tool in the box, but they do get paid to molest children, so, they can't be too stupid, in their own measure. You pay them, what does that say about you? You pay them to molest children. People don't like reading what I have to say. It isn't a mystery to me. So the honest productive people drove the criminals out, and then went back to work. Soon a new home grown group of legal criminals emerged in Massachusetts, and the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic was tested. One state began playing with dishonest money, using the stolen power, stolen from the only place power can be stolen from (other than from other criminals), which is the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals in Massachusetts began using the stolen power to commit aggressive wars for profit, against natives, and against Canadians. The legal criminals lost, they lost all the money, they didn't get the booty, and they raised the taxes, and they inflated the currency, which drove out the gold, and then, as legal criminals are apt to do, they outlawed the monetary competition, which was Whiskey, yes, Whiskey was the go-to-money of the day, which people could make at home, to use as money to buy other things, in the absence of gold, or better money, such as stamp script. The genius of the Federated Democratic Republic began to take shape when the rebels who fought the war for independence against the British legal criminal monetary frauds. then took up arms again to fight the home grown legal criminals monetary frauds running Massachusetts; which was still legal, it was still legal to rebel against a criminal government, how could it not be legal to Declare Independence - who undeclared it? The beauty of the Federated Democratic Republic was such that the people running The Articles of Confederation were not inclined, legally, to aid and abet, and give legal support, or even material support, to either side in the internal conflict in Massachusetts. The legal criminals won. The rebels who won the first war for independence, lost the second one, but all was not lost, except for all the casualties, but all was not lost for the survivors, who voted with their feet, and moved to Vermont. The victorious legal criminals in Massachusetts petitioned the leaders of the legal fiction known as Vermont, to hand over their runaway slaves, hell, they owned them after all, but, and again the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic shows up, the leaders of Vermont didn't hand over the free men who voted with their feet by moving out of the criminal state of Massachusetts and moving to the not as criminal, or perhaps even liberated State, of Vermont, all nice and tidy within the experimental Federated Democratic Republic under The Articles of Confederation. I am keeping this short, hell, I have to edit it. Liberty is not handed down on a silver platter, even if you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth. Someone mined the silver. Me nephew offers a quote he heard: He was born on 3rd base and he thinks he has hit a triple. The home grown legal criminals knew what was up, how could they not, their gravy train, their fast track to monetary nirvana, their monopoly, threw a rod. Their motor seized. The damn experiment works, the legal criminals' goose was cooked, the golden egg wasn't, it was a turd - to them. They had to do something. They did this: http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 They posed as Federalists. They claimed that The Debt had to be paid. Does that sound familiar? They were Nationalists, and Monarchists, and criminals. And they claimed to be against mob rule. And in order to get their "Constitution" ratified they appealed to the mob, with lies, with fabrications, with claims of noble intent, and they threw out a working Federated Democratic Republic and placed, in place, a Nation State, and their "Constitution" enabled all that it's opponents warned it would create. The ratification process included the already mentioned fraud, false advertizements, appealing to the mob, and a Dirty Compromise between the industrial Northern legal criminals and the agricultural southern legal criminals to divide the spoils of their victory over the honest productive people, including the black slaves, who were then legally bound to be returned to their owners upon request, anywhere within the newly formed Nation State. Many honest productive people were duped into believing in the lies produced by the Nationalists, the same nationalists who were hiding behind a thin veil of "Federalism". One of the dupes, taken in by the fraud, was a person named James Madison. James Madison jumped sides as quickly as George Washington; and I can explain, because this is important and relevant to current events; as the power struggle continues between the legal criminals (TSA, and their employers) and the opposition: the honest productive people (always the targets of the legal criminals). James Madison was the perfect dupe; as he wrote all the right things, to help convince the honest productive people (the mob, the rabble, the majority, the people, the tax payers) that the "Constitution" was going to be a better experimental Federated Democratic Republic, which it was categorically not, it was a Nation State, by design, it was a consolidated government, and it was tailored to be misconstrued, it was an enabler, it enabled plausible deniability, it could be constructively interpreted, on purpose. James Madison later grew a conscious, sufficient enough to admit error, and he then set about to oppose the people who were then constructively interpreting the consolidated government enabler, as James Madison then authored roughly half of The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. That is in the book I linked; you can stop reading my unwelcome text and read that book, and profit from the investment, or return here and blame me for your wasted effort. Please do. Back at the story line whereby Washington, having led the fight to oppose the British Monarchy, system of monetary fraud, and legal crime, complete with wars of aggression for profit, and all the crimes that spring for from that one, Washington, once enabled to do the contrary, changing sides, authored the following: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html King George: And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit; The Spirit George crushed was the same spirit within The Declaration of Independence, it was the Spirit of 1776. George assembled a conscript army, named The Watermelon Army, reportedly as large as the one he led to enforce liberty, and George took that army into Pennsylvania, a formerly separate and sovereign state, and crushed the second Whiskey Rebellion; whereby the new monetary frauds (Alexander Hamilton for example) were playing the same fraudulent monetary game, moving surplus wealth out of the hands of the people who create it, and into the hands of the people who steal it, and when the victims invent their own replacement currency, again Whiskey, the monetary monopoly enforcers, with their legal enabling documents, crush the competition where ever, and when ever it arises. Just ask Alexander Hamilton; when you meet him in hell - if that is where you are headed. I'm may be going there too. I have yet to see the light - but I do look for it. After some very bad things, whereby the legal criminals, enabled with their enabling legal documents, their licenses to torture, and murder, and even worse crimes, in between Georges test case, crushing "so fatal a spirit" and in between that historical event and the inappropriately named Civil War, which was not civil by any measure, more slaves were created than were set free, unless death is a measure of freedom, hell, slaves didn't have to pay money tax before the war, they paid in work and hide, they were not set free, they just changed masters. Many slaves now are slaves to falsehood, including me. I am setting myself free - the only way to get free - with help. In between those two events, the crushing of the spirit of 1776, and the Not So Civil War, was The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the things I want you to read about. The things I just now tried to clue you in on pertain to The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, relative to current events, as the power struggle continues. On the one side of the power struggle in The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the honest productive people represented by James Madison, writing for the Kentucky legal fiction, and Thomas Jefferson writing for the Virginia legal fiction, formerly a separate and sovereign state within a working experimental Federated Democratic Republic, but then a subordinate, lesser, and relatively insignificant power, a subject of, the legal criminals running the Nation State legal fiction; with its plausibly deniable enabling documentation: The Constitution. The opposition to The Constitution also tried to lessen the defeat with The Bill or Rights. How are they working for you now? I'll get a relevant quote from the reference book, and then continue comments. If you have read this far, you will now see the relevance to current events - if you care to see.
Jackson was fully prepared to enforce a tax law. I can find it again, in the source book. Jackson was no stranger to violence as a supposed means of solving problems. In the summer of 1832, Congress passed a new tariff bill. The average rate was reduced to 25 percent of the value of the imported goods. However, rates on iron, woolens, and cottons remained at the 50 percent level. To make matters worse in the Carolinians' eyes, the national treasury expected to enjoy a surplus in the 1830s as a result of the retirement of the debt from the War of 1912. As much as they loathed protection, South Carolinians were willing to be taxed to pay their portion of the war debt. But with debt retirement on the horizon, the tariff became even more unpopular. In short: The Northern power used their influence over the Nation State to skew tax burden onto the Southern power, and the Southern power used their influence within their not-so-sovereign State to write enabling documents that included nullification of the National tax, and included a call to arms to defend against invasion by National troops ordered to enforce the tax. Troops assembled, reportedly, on both sides. Stepping back in time a moment: The Dirty Compromise, in 1788, so as to enable "The Constitution", was a momentary truce between the legal criminals of the North, and the legal criminals of the South. The Nation state enabled one power to annex (steal) the other power. The Constitution ensured a Civil War, that is a documented fact. A Nation State is not a working Federated Democratic Republic. Separate and Sovereign states can succeed from a voluntary union, if they cant' it isn't a voluntary union, it is a Consolidated Nation State, a legal monopoly power. Monopoly powers cannot exist in competition with other powers; competition is the opposite of monopoly. The existence of competition nullifies the existence of a monopoly - by definition. Competition forces quality up, and cost down, even governments, even money. Monopoly forces the opposite, go figure. Separate and Sovereign States define their state of sovereignty, fictionally speaking, as do human beings define their sovereignty, but literally speaking. When you are ordered to obey, and you do obey, even though you know that unqualified obedience is as wrong as the torture, and the mass murder, and the end of the species, that occurs on that path, then you define the opposite of sovereignty. You are a slave; but that isn't nice to know, so ignore it, while you can?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jun 3rd, 2011 12:56 pm |
|
15th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Presidential ChallengeThey are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. Listening to Alex Jones - 06-03-2011 8:06am PDT The guest who spoke the words above is what is known as a whistle blower, a former insider, someone who now sings the warning of past, current, and future plans, and executions of the plans, of what I call the Legal Criminals. Product 1, a no interest loan, produced and maintained by competitive licensed franchises, private businesses (not legal fictions), and denominated in a separate and divided legal monetary unit, a competitive legal currency, can end Legal Crime. I know that it is a bold statement, and to support the validity of the statement, the idea is to begin looking at the power of numbers, such as the power of numbers offered by the guest speaker on the Alex Jones show. Trillions went missing from the dollar unit of legal currency. Think about that some, and then borrow my angle of view. Who cares what the Legal Criminals do with their money; so long as the honest productive people of America are no longer dependent upon the money produced and maintained by the Legal Criminals? Give Cesar that which is his; but don't sell yourself short by doing so, do not cut off your nose to spite your face, don't throw the baby out with the bath water, have a better money already working when the low quality and high cost stuff is phased out. If honest productive people need an honest means by which they can accurately account for their capacity to produce and trade, then make sure you have that necessary medium of exchange, make it, use it, and having done so it won't matter what the Legal Criminals do with their money. Make the dollar better, or failing to have the power to do so, replace it. Product 1 replaces the dollar and does so peacefully, voluntarily, gradually, and offers anyone who insists on "betting on" the value of the dollar all the time in the world to hedge that bet, so as not to be left holding the empty bag once the dollar does what the people who produce the dollar want - devalue. Are you unable to know the truth about the dollar and what the people who produce it want to do with the dollar? Are you brainwashed to a point whereby there is no room in your brain to grasp a world that manages to exist with something better than a money that is designed to devalue over time? Can you not imagine into being a money that does not devalue over time, or heaven forbid, a money that is designed to gain value over time? If the people running the dollar can make trillions disappear, more money than most people can imagine, what else can they do - what is the actual measure of their power? Product 1 allows the reader an opportunity to grasp the measure of the power that is commanded by The Legal Criminals, and Product 1 shows the reader where the power comes from; the power that The Legal Criminals command is the same power produced by the honest productive Americans. Pull the rug out from under those inglorious bastards. Product 1 is just, only just, a single monetary instrument, a no interest loan, whereby honest productive people (known credit power: high FICO score) borrow from their own capacity to produce surplus wealth, and the cost of producing and maintaining the "paper work" is paid back with Product 2, while Product 1 is designed to retire all the dollar denominated home (and business property) mortgages in America. How much money, how much economic (political/economic) power is the power in all the home and business property mortgages in America? Assuming roughly 100 million mortgages, and assuming an average of 100 thousand "dollars" (or equivalent in some other currency other than the dollar) the number is: 100,000,000 (100 million or 8 zeros) 100,000 (100 thousand or 5 zeros) 8 zeros adds to 5 zeros to make 13 zeros which is: 10,000,000,000,000 What is that? Look at the quotes already quoted above: They are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. 1. They are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. How much power is required if the goal is to enforce a global legal money monopoly? Product 1 = 10,000,000,000,000 How much power is that much power? 2. Trillions went missing... How much power is no longer your power, and where did all that power go, after it "went missing"? 3. Much too much money to "just" make the Rothschild rich. Money is not the point. Power is the point. If you order the destruction of Iran (or America), will anyone obey you, even if you show them a bank account balance with 12 zeros on it? 4. They are re-engineering...government. There is an obvious (even if you don't want to see it) effort to shift the global legal monopoly money power (now known as The Dollar Hegemony, and The World Reserve Currency) from the dollar unit of currency to something else, from America, to some place else, I think they are going to China, you can guess yourself, I am not an insider, you may be one, I can't know where, you may know were, the point is that it is obvious that America is on the Bust schedule, and China is on the Boom schedule, you can open your eyes to see it, and then understand it, and then begin to work at divorcing yourself from it. How can you if your power to see is stolen from you through falsehood, and how can you act if your power to act is stolen from you with the money fraud "business cycle"? Product 1 allows you to measure the power struggle in such a way as to begin seeing a competitive path out of the mire. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ If you think that you must have the dollar, or perish, then I think you are suffering from brain washing, as I was, as I am no longer. How do you think I managed to invent Joe's Law, Product 1, and Product 2, despite all the power that suppresses original thought? Would you recognize a solution to a problem if you saw one, and if not, why not?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jun 5th, 2011 01:41 pm |
|
16th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive people of America, Few of you even know what to ask a person who can represent you; and I know this from personal experience, decades of searching for someone who could represent me, and finding none. Now, you may respond, that sounds like a challenge. This is my basic point. You are challenged, and what do you do with that challenge? Do you shrink, retreat, hide, and shiver? No, you are an honest productive American, and as such, you meet the challenge, and you overcome the competition, and you raise the bar, and you hit the ball out of the park, and you set the competition scrambling to gain advantage as competition forces higher quality and lower cost. So, then, how can YOU explain the total lack of any presidential challenger from sea to shining sea? Can you look at yourself in the mirror and honestly claim that there is one? You may be suffering from delusion, and if so, are you capable of setting aside hubris long enough to entertain the slightest realization that it may be a good time to test your knowledge, to work some, to ask one question, just in case you are not as overpowering in competitive understanding as you have led yourself to believe? I'm leading into a method by which my On-Line Presidential Campaign solicits, seeks, demands, and offers competitive debate among any one, or two, or more, of the honest productive Americans who could, by chance, employ a representative, one who represents honest productive Americans, in their government, run by them, as they employ the government they choose, to accomplish the goals they demand to be accomplished, or they will find someone who will accomplish the goals that they have chosen to be the goals they will accomplish with their government. There you have the challenge, before you, if you are an honest productive American, and you seek a Presidential Challenger, one who will answer your questions, so as to afford you the vital information that you require, as you search for someone who can, and will, represent you, or else: you will find, by asking questions, gaining knowledge, someone who will do the job that you demand to be done. I stood before the electorate, during a very brief campaign for a seat in The House of Representatives, and I learned a few things during that experience. I learned, for example, that all people are almost identical in mind and body, and the few differences among people are almost insignificant; with few exceptions. Almost everyone wants happiness; and almost everyone will do that which is necessary to move closer to happiness and to move further away from misery, no matter what words are used in place of those two words. A. Happiness B. Misery The few exceptions include some people whose concept of happiness is the happiness they move toward when they inflict misery upon innocent victims; inflicting misery on babies, children, young men and women, honest productive men and women, and old men and women makes them happy. That is a significant difference. When someone like that says something along the lines of that which is to be done in the pursuit of happiness, it may be a good idea to understand what that person means when that person says those things. A. Spreading Democracy B. Defending Freedom You may want to pay closer attention to the actual intentions that your future representative might be working toward when your future representative declares to you, that they will spread democracy and that they will defend freedom. You may want to sharpen your wit, just in case, in case someone in government is the exception to the rules. When he, or she, says that the sky is blue, for example, you may want to get a second opinion. I am offering a means by which you can spar, or practice, or warm-up, or sharpen, or a way in which you can gain a competitive edge, so as to be in better shape, so as to ensure that you do things that moves you closer to your goal. Now, consider, the opposite. I am also an honest productive American, and as such, I am working the same path as almost everyone else, with few exceptions. What happens if one of the exceptions challenges me? Can you see a possible explanation for the total absence of any challenge to my viewpoints? Will you be able to understand, to conceptualize, and to know what a representative of the honest productive American people says, if you ever find one; presuming any one of the honest productive American people are even looking for one? Who is willing to step up to the plate? You have found one, if you have read this far. Now look in the mirror - please. What do you see? Is that voice silent? Why? If you disagree with something I wrote, including my explanations of two liberating financial products, or my viewpoints on politics, or economics, then consider saying something, challenge me, and challenge your own understanding - just in case you may need to know better. Look at who runs your government; who chose them? Why? Are they stupid; or are professional liars, cheats, and criminals in demand, wanted, needed, desired, so as to move closer to the goal? What is the goal when the employees keep on hiring criminals? Are you now inspired to crawl back under your rock? I'm curious enough to ask.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jun 8th, 2011 12:52 pm |
|
17th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
06-08-2011 Anyone, Listening to Alex Jones and Jesse The Body Ventura. Jesse has a point of view. Alex has a point of view. People who target either person, and ignore the point of view, are people who confess their intentions to target personalities, not viewpoints. What about the points of view? One single constant point of view can be seen as a principle. Look at one, see one, and see nothing else, for a moment - please. One single constant point of view, one principle: Unchallenged Obedience Unchallenged Obedience See it. That is a principle. That is a single thing, a single mind set, a single point of view. See it, alone, and realize it, alone, as one single principle. Now, for no other reason that boredom, having spent an eternity of time viewing, seeing, knowing, and realizing, the one single myopic principle of Unchallenged Obedience, look, please, at one other viewpoint, and do so for a fraction of a second, and do not look at anything other than Unchallenged Obedience for more than than once fraction of a second. I just heard: July 3rd,4rth, and 5th, a no buying gas, and a no flying protest. I will get back to that soon. For now, please, return to the one myopic, single, constant, consistent, viewpoint, the one, principle, Unchallenged Obedience viewpoint, and do so for an imaginary eternity of time, as all human life obeys that single principle for the entire span of human existence from the first human being to the last anywhere in the entire Universe, and for one single second of time, a competitive viewpoint emerges within that time span, and then the one second of alternative, adaptive, competitive, challenge-to-the-one-myopic-viewpoint vanishes forever. 1. Unchallenged Obedience (99.99999999999% of human time) 2. Not #1 (.000000000000001% of human time - one second, from one human, and then a return to Unchallenged Obedience forevermore) I offer this angle of view so as to illustrate a principle, and to do so by way of stark comparison, by way of seeing one thing, and then next to the one thing is placed another thing, so as to realize how one thing compares to another thing. How does anyone, ever, know, or realize, or understand, or conceptualize, or believe, right from wrong? If there is only one thing, then there is no way to know right from wrong, the one thing is the only thing, therefore there is no possible way to know right from wrong. Once another thing exists, in time and space, a viewpoint, from a person, can then compare one thing relative to another thing, and this is the principle, this is challenge, this is competition, this is the constitution of, the construction of, the creation of, and then the exercise of, willful choice. If the single myopic viewpoint is Unchallenged Obedience, if that is chosen, it remains a choice, when the physical fact of existence presents alternatives, such as the illustrated alternative to which my words intend to convey as such: 1. Unchallenged Obedience 2. Competition There are two things, not one. The idea, at this point, is to look at Unchallenged Obedience, and see it, for what it is, and it is false, it is a lie, it is a deception, it is not competitive, it is not right, it is not even possible, as such a viewpoint, no matter how popular the belief in it may be, it is not humanly possible in any state of existence, at any time, since a single person, as a human being, has a competitive viewpoint, by definition, by factual reality, by the fact of existing, the single human being challenges obedience to the false idea of Unchallenged Obedience. A person may be forced to obey a tax law, for example, as one person presents another person with one, single, myopic, dictate, demand, and order to pay the tax, no choice, pay the tax, there are no other choices, pay the tax, and the person pays the tax, because there is no other choice, at that moment in time. Path A: Pay the tax Path B: Pay the tax No choice, the facts prove, there is no choice, there is only Unchallenged Obedience, at that time, at that place, as one person gains power at the expense of another person, and therefore, the precedence is set, proof positive, Unchallenged Obedience exists, you are then unable to consider any other option, Unchallenged Obedience does exist, it is, all other options shall not be questioned. There is only one. Unchallenged Obedience There is no other. Really? Who is fooling who? Look here: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html That is the "official" version of The Constitution (according to whoever authorized and then published that Web Page). AMENDMENT XIV Who supports the one myopic viewpoint, the Unchallenged Obedience viewpoint, and by what lie does that person manage that support? Have I lost you? I can offer two, reasonable, just, equitable, and liberating challenges to the lie of Unchallenged Obedience, for you to consider, alone, in your individual time, in your individual space, as you are offered these two challenges to the false viewpoint knowable as Unchallenged Obedience, such as the illustrated case above, quoted as: "shall not be questioned" in the "official" version of the false "law of the land". 1. Trial by Jury http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html 2. Equitable Commerce http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf I am offering three things to see, you can see three things, and you can compare three things, as three things challenge your current viewpoint. Blind, Unchallenged, Obedience, "shall not be questioned" is 1 thing. Trial by Jury not only questions Obedience, Trial by Jury authorizes, by law, each individual person, with the power to nullify any law. Do you understand that concept? A. Blind obedience to the people who enforce The Constitution, as those enforcers choose to interpret The Constitution the way they choose to interpret The Constitution. B. Any Juror sitting on any Jury nullifies any example of intended enforcement by any enforcer who tries to enforce their interpretation of The Constitution. Do you see the power at play? A lawful enforcer of The Constitution intends to enforce his interpretation of The Constitution upon a targeted "law breaker", and any one Juror, on any Jury, has more power than any enforcer of The Constitution, as the attempt to enforce The Constitution is nullified by the one, single, Juror, who can be anyone on any jury. You may think that my words are false, and you may want to hold onto your blind obedience viewpoint with some measure of sycophantic fever, I suppose, while the data, not me, the data supports my viewpoint. A single Juror has the legal power to nullify any interpretation made by any hired enforcer of any law in the land where Trial by Jury is a working legal power. Call me stupid, if it makes you feel better at this moment in your use of human life. If you are ever punished by some hired enforcer of "the law of the land" and you were not afforded the opportunity of having your punishment nullified by one of 12 people who are randomly chosen among all of your peers, then that is what happens to you, as Trial by Jury doesn't work for you - too bad for you. You are punished. To bad for you. Added to that Trial by Jury challenge to the myopic unchallenged obedience viewpoint, shared by millions, I place in front of you a second, and even more powerful, challenge to that lie of blind obedience; which is blind obedience to falsehood. In one group there exists an army of people fueled by lies, parroting lies, using lies to injure innocent people for profit, or for fun, and even people believing in the lies, based upon the single myopic principle, which is false, which is Unchallenged Obedience, an army, a zombie army, a brainwashed army of sycophantic psychopaths and sociopaths, raining evil down upon their targeted victims, perpetually, and unchallenged by some measure, since they do exist, they do command that power of falsehood, and they do commit their legal crimes, and the measure of their victims include the screams of the tortured, and the piles, and piles, and piles of legally murdered victims, and in the challenging group people do challenge the myopic blind obedience lie. One group: Unchallenged Obedience One Challenger (group) Trial by Jury Another Challenger (group) Equitable Commerce You may have a hard time shedding all the falsehood that covers up the other Challengers to the Unchallenged Obedience group. You can read the link, or you can depend upon me to place that challenge in front of you, in such a way as to afford you the opportunity to appraise it accurately. The FED has the legal license to borrow from the Good Faith and Credit of The American people (the tax payers), and the people commanding that legal license have borrowed trillions, spent trillions, and the result of their expenses is bankruptcy. They say that the honest productive people are bankrupt, they say that the Good Faith in Credit of The American people is tarnished, discredited, lower in power, as a direct result of the failure to invest borrowed money economically. Who borrowed from who? Who is bankrupt? Who earns Good Faith and Credit? Who are the debtors? Who are the creditors? Why do the victims believe in falsehoods that target them, punish them, and then make them pay for their own punishment? If you are told to dig your own grave, jump in it, and then fill in the hole on top of you, do you do that too? If you are told to dig faster, do you do that too? How is that different from you lending someone money, that you earn, and then the borrower tells you that you owe them for the money they borrowed and wasted? You produce surplus wealth. They borrow that from you. They spend that borrowed money. They then tell you that you are broke, and that you owe them the entire sum of money they have borrowed from you, and on top of that, they say you owe them interest on the money they borrowed from you? You claim that I am stupid? Really? The Unchallenged Obedience group supports the idea that the Good Faith and Credit of The American people is bankrupt; as a result of the actions perpetrated by a few people who have the single legal power to borrow from the honest productive American people. What do you think is the obvious challenge to that myopic, false, Unchallenged Obedience group, viewpoint? What happens if each honest productive American person, proven to be a powerful force of production, proven to have earned Good Faith and Credit, has more power than those few people at The FED? The same thing works in economy as it does in law. Trial by Jury gives each person more power than the employees of The People. A member of a Jury, in a Trial by Jury, has more legal power than any law enforcer anywhere within the legal reach of a government that has a working Trial by Jury legal process. What does Equitable Commerce prove? Equitable Commerce proves that the same legal power of Trial by Jury, in law enforcement, is proven to work in economy, as each person is afforded as much, or more, power than any hired person running the government, as each person has the legal power to borrow from their own, well earned, good faith and credit. You can see the world from the point of view that goes unchallenged, or you can challenge that lie. Back to the proposed protest in July: Alex Jones and Jesse Ventura spoke of a protest in July. I can offer a similar future event, I've done so, and I will do the same again. One person, me, or anyone, publishes a pending date in the future, on the calender, and on that date the idea is to be liberated, on that date, the people agreeing to be liberated on that date, declare that they will be liberated on that date, and that is what happens on that date, so long as enough people agree to be liberated on that date, and the date can be moved sooner, or the date can be moved later, depending upon the rate by which the numbers required volunteer to be liberated on that date. If the date by which The People will liberate themselves is July 4th 2011, then that is the date by which The People will liberate themselves. How many of The People are needed to constitute a sufficient power in opposition to the one myopic Unchallenged Obedience power? You can offer a rough number. I will offer my opinion. How about 60% of the population? I can be much more precise with the actual requirements of the power that is needed. Honest productive Americans have to be the people who will constitute those people who have the power to liberate themselves, precisely those people. Liberated people are people who voluntarily associated with each other, equitably, as they produce much more than they consume, as the supply of surplus wealth reaches a higher than ever recorded amount of surplus wealth, and those liberated people then have the power to liberate themselves, and those people then challenge the legal criminal power, and the challenge is peaceful, and the challenge is voluntary, and the challenge over-powers the single myopic Unchallenged Obedience group, because those people decide to command the power they produce in that way, on that day. One person picks a date. Another person agrees to that date. More people join in on the liberty day effort. Many more people agree. The agreement is nothing more, and nothing less, than an agreement to challenge the Unchallenged Obedience group, to pledge honorably, to no longer be among that group, on that future date, when enough honest productive Americans will no longer be perpetually punished by that legal criminal group. While that future date approaches there may be many offerings of viewpoints as to what will happen on that date. I can offer, for example, that competition in money markets is a necessary thing to allow on that date, or even better, have competition in money markets working well before that date, since competition in legal money markets will slow down the flow of power from the honest productive Americans as that power flows to the legal criminals. Legal competition in money markets will stop that flow of power from the honest productive people, and that power will no longer flow to those legal criminals as a result of allowing legal competition in money markets - and the result will be such that the honest productive group of people will then produce an astonishing amount of surplus wealth as that group becomes so much more powerful than any legal crime group, that legal crime will no longer be profitable. You can challenge blind obedience as you see fit, within your own power capacity to do so. Good luck, alone. The single, myopic, sycophantic, psychopathic, sociopathic, pathological, despotic, monopolistic, unchallenged, obedient, false, viewpoint is rendered powerless, unprofitable, by competition. Forms of competition that render the legal crime power powerless include the Trial by Jury legal power, and legal money competition - both challenge and render the legal crime group powerless. You can know this, and work with this, and if more people know this, and more people work with this information, liberty day will arrive on the day it does, without fanfare, or on a new scheduled day of celebration. Legal crime currently pays trillions; don't be confused as to why.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jun 10th, 2011 01:51 pm |
|
18th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Predatory Capitalism and War for Oil Anyone (except those whose interest is willful injury to the innocent), My offering today concerns a personal episode, one of those lucid dreams, involving a coalescence of perception into one pointed viewpoint; as if a vital piece finally finds its way into the puzzle, and the picture is suddenly unmistakably obvious. I thought, and now I think, and nothing has yet to challenge this new thought competitively as yet, that the legal criminals will eventually monopolize the insurance industry. In order to convey to the reader this new viewpoint I can employ specific data such as the link at the top of the page, which constitutes a welcome flow of power from someone who earned that power through his closely connected experiences with the legal crime network; the network known by many names. 1. The Dollar Hegemony 2. The Military Industrial Complex 3. Wall Street 4. The New World Order 5. Legal Crime Before the reader turns away active, and willful, control of his, or her, personal command of thought, consider, please, focusing attention on specific people who breath air, wear cloths, eat food, and depend, as you do, on their own personal power to survive in this, our, lifetime; as we, the living, still manage to live. Add a personal interest in viewing these things; walk in their shoes, figuratively speaking; make it personal. In particular, there are people who have more power than you, and there are people who have less power than you, and on that scale the more powerful people are fewer, and the less powerful people are more numerous, and the scale ends up looking like a pyramid, and I am asking you to look closer, for now, at the most powerful people, and look as closely as possible, so close, within your own power, to accurately identify the uppermost powerful people on the planet, as if your intent was to accurately identify the one most powerful person - and then try to be that person for an imaginary length of time, so as to better understand power. Pyramids on Reality Television (helping to understand the monopoly power structure): 1. Survivor 2. America's Most Wanted 3. American Idol 4. America's Got Talent 5. 2012 Election Cycle The top one is competitively more powerful, by merit, compared to the next best one, by some measure of some kind. The measure may be fixed, false, rigged, predetermined, but the concept remains obvious. This is not that difficult of a concept to know; and it is a useful perception. The above intends to employ the principle understanding of individual, competitive, adaptive, advantage, or leverage, toward the accurate identification of the most dangerous threat to the human species - perhaps not something on your own personal top 10 laundry list of things to do, but something of value none the less. Quote from the link: It [War] was to protect oil. You do not have the power to send an all volunteer army, navy, airforce, marines, private corporate mercenary soldiers, support people, food, shelter, clothing, bombs, missiles, truck loads of 100 dollar bills stacked on pallets by the tons, torturers, and mass murderers, on aggressive wars for profit, be your goal oil, be your goal a physical form of power used to back up a fraudulent legal currency monopoly, or be your goal, in your mind, a serial killing for the shear joy of watching massive numbers of innocent people suffer miserably on their ways to early deaths, stacked up onto piles, and piles, of commingled funeral pyres. Place the most innocent on that pyramid top. Your goal may be simple: to get the most power flowing from anywhere, and everywhere, to you; if you were, accurately measured as, the most powerful one alive. You are not. Neither am I. The goal that is chosen is as competitive a choice as is the individual who commands the power to move toward the chosen goal. Pick the wrong goal, and you may then be the less powerful competitor, for failure to pick the more competitive goal, and then investing all your power digging holes, and then filling them back up. Know the person moving toward the goal, know the actions perpetrated by the person moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be a liar moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be ignorant moving toward the goal, and the goal may become obvious; despite the falsehoods, deceptions, threats of violence, and acts of willful violence perpetrated perpetually upon the innocent victims as those legal criminals move toward their chosen goals. Which immediately next goal would you willfully move toward if your long term goal was to move up one more level on that power pyramid that does exist in actual reality; presuming to place your viewpoint in the shoes of someone near the top? It [War] was to protect oil. I am now here to inform you of a very competitive answer. Those at the top of the power structure have a few obvious chores to accomplish, and maintain, at the top of their chosen power structure. 1. Move power from those who create power to those who are at the top. 2. Use the power, that has been moved, to keep the power flowing in that direction. Failure to accomplish those goals will result in two obvious possible results. 1. The people who create power have more power, as less power moves from them, and less power moves to those who move power from those who create power to those who are at the top. The Pyramid flattens out. 2. Someone else moves power from those who create power, to those who move power to the top, power moved from those who create power. Same pyramid, you are not at the top. Another quote: They love war, they live this business because it keeps them in power. Competitive methods by which power flows from those who create power to those who move that power: 1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding) 2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding) 3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment) 4. Voluntary Banking (Saving) 5. Insurance Please consider using a few examples of actual accounts of power currently flowing from those who create power to those places where power flows; from the many to the few. 1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding) What happens to you if you decide to stop sending your power to the people who are now confessing their crimes of torture and mass murder for profit? You have forms to fill out, papers to sign, and failure to do so results in specific measures of things done to you, as you are innocent of torture, and you are innocent of mass murder, and you want to remain innocent of those crimes, so you decide to stop lending political support, stop lending psychological support, stop sending physical support, stop sending material support, to people who are, without any doubt, lying, torturing, and mass murdering, pathological serial killers, sycophants, sociopaths, and psychopathic legal criminals, by their well documented deeds, as well as their well documented falsehoods, and their well documented acts, as the screams of the innocent dying perpetuate - you stop empowering them - what happens to you? 2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding) What happens to you if you find your economical situation turning from a powerful capacity to produce surplus wealth, well above your ability to consume the wealth that you produce, to a situation whereby your power to produce wealth reduces below your current rate of consumption? What happens if you need to borrow from your own good faith and credit; and you find that someone else has borrowed from you, and wasted your power, and someone now tells you that you owe them for the money they borrowed from you, and they say that you owe them interest on the money they borrowed from you, as they take more, and more, and more of your power, and they give that power to their closest associates, and they raise their pay rate, and they reward their most effective associates with bonuses, and bailouts, and then, if their investments do pay off, they hide those profits from you, while they still demand you to pay them for the money they borrowed from you, and they still demand you to pay them interest on the money they borrowed from your capacity, and your power, to produce good faith and credit, and surplus wealth in abundance - what happens to you - what do you do about what happens to you? You give them more when they demand more? How does that end; for lack of a competitive alternative? You will not find a more accurate explanation of Monopoly Banking Fraud than the paragraph above; and those who support those legal crimes will attack me personally, so as to willfully help perpetuate that very big lie. The war games are not for oil; they are for anything that will perpetuate the monopoly banking fraud. 3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment) What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an ability to have a three digit phone number to call in case of fire, injury, accident, or any case of helplessness, or emergency, where you really can use an emergency response, during that unfortunate event? What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an effort to collect enough funds to accomplish a noble goal, such as charity for the poor, or aid to the sick, or even finance for studies reaching for human cures to human disasters? What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an armed force of defenders who are ready and able to respond to an attack by a powerful criminal army of aggressors seeking profit at your expense? What do you call a willful choice to send money to a central location to help build roads, hospitals, libraries, schools, and even businesses that offer shares in their capacity to produce more surplus wealth than they consume? 4. Voluntary Banking (Saving) That is against the law. If you do find a place to send your power off-shore, out of the country, you may be guilty of money laundering, or some such legal crime. What do you call an effort on your part to secure your own personal supply of surplus wealth; to keep it as valuable as the day you earned it, on into the foreseeable future? 5. Insurance I am going to reach for another quote before addressing number 5 on that laundry list. George Washington would not claim us today. If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not the path that moves the power produced by honest productive Americans, by way of deceit, by way of threats of horrible violence, and by way of horrible violence upon the innocent, to the legal criminals who have a diametrically opposed goal in mind. George Washington was a turn coat, from the goal of liberty, which is the best insurance against the worst loss known to mankind, to date, as George Washington turned his coat toward aggressive wars for profit; and he confessed that very thing. If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not repeating the same path that moves in the opposite direction, over, and over, and over again, as if this one time, a different result will occur. Notice in that Real News Report how the slow learner finally realized that Ronald Regan was the opposite of the false front that was projected in front of his true color? That is the same old, tired, game, used by the nationalists (Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington when he turned his coat) as they projected the false front of Federalism over their true color, so as to cover up their true legal crimes. The slow learner has a lot of learning yet to do; despite his extensive experience, hard earned, I suspect, connected deep into legal crime. On to my story, for you. Legal crime, the pyramid structure, annexes, or accumulates, or takes-over, or recruits, all competitors into one amalgamated whole. This is not an unfamiliar story. In Alexander Hamilton's (and his minion George Washington's) day the monopolists annexed the sovereign and separate, competitive, state governments, into one national government, one consolidated government, one indivisible union, and the punishment for failure to obey, was, and is, aggressive violence perpetrated upon you, for profit of the perpetrators, or their employers. What happens when you choose to employ other people to work toward your own injury, and you employ the same people to injure your loved ones - what does that make you in fact, how do you measure up precisely as a competitor, to say, someone seeking liberty? George Washington conscripted a national army and invaded Pennsylvania to enforce the legal money monopoly power, and later, Abraham Lincoln invaded the southern states to enforce the slavery of the slavers, and enforce the slavery of the slaves, in the south. Honest Abe had the north covered. George Washington's network of slave traders could not allow a competitive money to exist, which would have forced George Washington's network of slave traders to produce higher quality and lower cost money, and thereby reduce their power to conduct aggressive wars for profit, at will. Abraham Lincoln and his network of slave traders could not allow the competitive slave traders in the south to exist, failure to enforce the involuntary union would have forced the northern slave traders to compete with the southern slave traders, for higher quality, and lower cost enslavement, as slaves would vote with their feet, within their power to do so, loving, or leaving, their chains of enslavement in one place, and moving to a better place. Slaves running from low quality enslavement in the south may run, and find refuge up north, working subsistence wages in industry; while subsistence wage workers up north could run down south, to escape that form of slavery, to replace the slaves flowing up north, working competitive wages in agriculture - if competition was allowed, which it wasn't, and that is the point. Insurance is the same thing. Which company offers the highest quality insurance, at the lowest cost, while competition forces that move from low quality to high quality, and high cost to low cost? What happens when the number of insurance providers reduce from the number in existence now, down to three, then two, and then an effective monopoly? Why call one thing two names; when both things are the same thing? Republicans Democrats Legal Criminals
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jun 15th, 2011 07:53 am |
|
19th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive Americans, The new generation will replace the old one; and I'm not offering opinion here, so you can park your ego if you feel like arguing with someone. Among that new generation there will be honest productive Americans; and there will also be among them those who seek to gain the power produced by the honest productive Americans. Do you think that the new generation of honest productive Americans will be more successful in avoiding the transfer of their power to the group who seek to gain that power? If that last sentence is difficult to conceptualize I can offer a measure of help; if you want to ask or answer that last question. Look at the Debt Clock: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Do you think that the next generation of honest productive Americans will be more successful than the last generation at avoiding the flow of power that is created by the honest productive Americas to those who steal it by deceit, by threats of violence, and by actual acts of torturous, and mass murderous violence, such as the totals of power being transferred on that Debt Clock web page? Do you think that the next generation of honest productive Americans will slow down the transfers of power on that Debt Clock web page, stop that transfer of power in that direction, and then will the next generation of Americans keep the power they earn instead of having the power they earn stolen as that Debt Clock records, in that way? My words may appear to be opinionated to you. I can see that my words are merely factual. The question has nothing to do with my opinion. Do you think that the next generation will figure out how better to avoid having the power they earn taken? If you think so, then my next question is why, and what happens to cause that reversal of human fortune? Will the next generation be empowered with a higher sense of moral conscience; and therefore less willing to be stupefied by the legal crime class of modern day despotic slave masters? I'm guessing that the new generation will face, at least, a more accurate assessment of their supposed superiors, and empowered, therefore, to avoid the mistakes made by their predecessors. Here is my inspirational link for the day: http://lewrockwell.com/north/north992.html In simple terms: The source of wealth (purchasing power) is the honest productive American people; by which the legal crime class gain the power that they currently command, as that power has no other source from which it can be acquired. Knowing that fact: the concept of borrowing must accurately identify the person, or the people, who have no power, the ones who receive the power from those who have the power. The legal crime class borrow from the honest productive American people. How then are the honest productive American people made to believe that they owe something to the borrowers? How does that work? How are the people who are accurately accountable as the source of wealth made to believe that they owe the legal criminals payments resulting from loans taken out by the legal criminals? The legal criminals are the people who have borrowed the power to purchase from the honest productive American people; how then are the honest productive American people made to think that they owe those borrowers something more, on top of what the legal criminals already borrowed, more is due to flow to those legal criminals, from the honest productive Americans, supposedly, because the legal criminals borrowed the power to purchase? How can honest productive people be that stupid? Is it me? You earn a living. Your work produces wealth. Someone then borrows from you that wealth that you create. Got that so far? Now that person comes back to you years later and demands from you payments on the money that they borrowed from you. Do you see a problem yet? Then that person tells you that you owe them interest on the money that they borrowed from you. If you are reading this and you wonder, for a fraction of a second, if what I'm telling you is true, then there is hope for the next generation. Here, is a toast, a salute, to hope, for the next generation - from me to you. Following the money includes a look into C.A.F.R (Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports) - if you are at all interested in knowing the facts documented by the legal criminals who continue to steal the power that is created by the honest productive people of America - perhaps some day you may need that power for something good, something other than financing torture and mass murder. Good luck.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jun 16th, 2011 02:21 pm |
|
20th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones 06-16-2011 Honest productive Americans, When the official professors of high finance begin to report the facts to you, please, stand yourself on moral principle, and then see the facts from that solid foundation. Since WWII the legal criminals have been borrowing money from honest productive Americans and claiming that honest productive American's owe the legal criminals instead of telling the truth. Get that clear, so as to understand the truth about the current reports that concern the supposed economic collapse pending. You must see this factually. Where does surplus wealth come from? Is that too far ahead, did I go over your head, is that last question not well understood, in context? How about the following principled question, that is founded upon moral principle: What is surplus wealth? You must know this, if you want to uncover the truth about the current situation whereby the legal criminals are being uncovered publicly; where once the legal criminals were well hidden from the average Joe and average Jane honest productive American. What is surplus wealth? Once you answer that question you will begin to see what the legal criminals target, you will begin to see the prize that the legal criminals are interested in stealing from you. Once you answer that question you will begin to have a clear, moral, foundation, from which to begin unraveling the crimes of the century. Surplus wealth is the amount of wealth that is left over after wealth is consumed. To illustrate the measure of surplus wealth you can look at the Pyramids in Egypt. The people who built the Pyramids in Egypt had enough surplus wealth to spend, enough of a greater supply of wealth after expenses, to built those Pyramids, and they didn't have modern mechanical advantages whereby human labor is much more efficient compared to ancient Egypt. Today there is enough surplus wealth to build cities under ground, and to travel to the moon. Now that you have an answer for the question of "What is surplus wealth" you can now answer the next question that may have gone over your head: Where does surplus wealth come from? The answer to that question is the same answer that the legal criminals must answer so as to empower the legal criminals with a target, a mark, and an exploitable object in their cross hairs, as they seek to gain control over surplus wealth. Legal criminals have a vested interest in knowing the answer to that question, as they seek to gain control of surplus wealth, they must know where surplus wealth comes from, so the question is not specious, the question is not irrelevant, and the accurate answer to the question will empower you with a greater understanding of the current situation; as the legal criminals continue to cause the current economic collapse that is pending. Surplus wealth comes from the honest productive people who create more than they consume; and that is a factual measure of reality - not open to debate. I have answered the question factually; like answering the question of where does sunlight come from: The Sun. You can argue; but what would be the point of arguing? You are targeted by the legal criminals, and they have already stolen from you, by claiming that you are borrowing from them, when they are actually borrowing from you. They claim that you owe them money. How are you made to believe that you owe them money? What am I talking about? Is this guy named Joe Kelley a nut job? Look at the facts that they report to you: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Do you really believe that the people who have borrowed from your power to create surplus wealth (the good faith and credit of the American tax payers) are now the beneficiaries of your future ability to create more surplus wealth? They borrow from you and then they turn around and claim that you owe them; and you owe them interest on top of the principle that they borrowed from you? Really? And you think I am a kook? Who is wearing the tin hat? If you have looked into Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports and you are confused by it, then are you in a position to claim that I am stupid? Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports is one more, of many, scams, all connected in a Network of scams, and if all of those scams, connected to that one Network, can be seen a hegemonic whole, you can then know it better as The Dollar Hegemony. The connecting medium is the single legal monopoly money; and it exists because all competition is against the law. Once a competitor is allowed to compete, by law, all those scams vanish - and I can explain, if you remain confused, and if you no longer want to be confused, if you now see that you can no longer afford to be confused. It is not confusing, it is easy to understand. You must first stand on a solid foundation. What is surplus wealth? Where does surplus wealth come from? How is surplus wealth measured? If criminals (with or without badges) enforce one single method of measuring surplus wealth, such as The Dollar, what do you think those criminals will do with that Power (legal or not)? They will cook the books, they have, and the measure of their crimes is literally documented by following that money.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 02:09 pm | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in candidate for president of America 2012 | Top |
