 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Today I call back the representative from the Libertarian Party who contacted me via e-mail. I assume that the representative from the Libertarian Party contacted me via e-mail as a result of me contacting the Libertarian Party via their Web Page; when I sent in my notice of consideration for becoming the Libertarian candidate for president.
Are there any science fiction readers among the readers here?
An author wrote some very good books of which I will link one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender%27s_Game
The IF tests all children on Earth and selects the brightest for the Battle School for military training.
There is a concept illustrated in that book. The concept involves a process by which people move the best people toward jobs that require the best people to do those jobs the best.
What is the process by which the best people to do the job of The President of the United States of America are moved into that job?
I am not a pathological liar, I do not torture, and I do not mass murder, so, logically, I am not qualified to be as good as the majority of Presidents of the United States of America.
Who represents whom?
If the idea is to stop the flow of power from those who create power, currently flowing to the torturing mass murderers who then use that stolen power to keep the power flowing that way, then, I may not be the best to accomplish that job, but, at least, I have a working plan.
Who else has a working plan?
I can say with confidence that Ron Paul has a working plan, and that is about it, as far as Presidential challengers go.
If the idea is to make sure that the power continues to flow from the people who create power to the torturing mass murderers who commit unspeakable crimes with that power, then any of the other pathological sociopaths running for president will do just fine.
Take your pick.
I have two other relevant things to address at this time.
1.
That which is good for the goose, is good for the gander, or something called Universality, or, The Golden Rule, or, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, or justice, or fairness, or equity.
I like the word equity, it works best.
If you meet someone, anyone, and you get away with that person's power, he has less power as a result of having made contact with you, then that is the measure of inequity.
Here is a link on that subject:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28063.htm
The problem there is typical of a situation whereby the base, foundation, of rational thought is an error - or a willful lie. Error leads to more error. A social structure based upon crime is not a social structure based upon equity, or justice, and therefore it is as wrong to say that it is right to torture and mass murder, no matter who does it, because the basis of the wrong is wrong, the foundation of the wrong leads to more things that are wrong.
This must be understood, or there will be more misunderstanding, not less.
Example:
The Declaration of Independence
The U.S. Constitution
The Bill of Rights
Two of the above written documents are based, founded, upon a founding base foundation, that is equitable, fair, logical, reasonable, right, moral, universal, and as good for the goose as it is good for the gander, those two documents are the first and last in the list above.
The exception is the middle document, which is in fact a document that is diametrically opposite the other two, and knowing this fact is one thing, and being ignorant of this fact is yet again something else entirely.
Which is better?
A. Knowing
B. Ignorance
Which is better for whom?
2.
Getting from path B, back to Path A, can happen, but it can't happen by traveling further down path B, which leads inevitably to path C, and then not likely ever to get back to path A, more likely to end with human extinction.
1. Path A
Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Equity, Fairness, Universality, good foundation, moral thoughts and actions, power used to make more power, productive life, higher quality life, lower cost life, less crime, reaching closer toward minimum crime, crime is less and less profitable, less and less affordable.
2. Path B
Crime, legal or otherwise: profitable plans once executed that are designed to accomplish the goal of transferring power from those who create power to those who steal it, whereby the stolen power is then used to perpetuate that flow of power, and power is used to govern the supply of power down to a manageable level, a level that allows the criminals to set the price of power as high as they desire, and the consumers of power are powerless to avoid having to pay that price, and the criminal power is used up in the process of eliminating competition where ever, and when ever, competition arises.
3. Path C
Accelerating torture and mass murder, accelerating rates of accelerated torture and mass murder, resulting in the extinction of human life, if not all life, on the unique planet Earth, for ever.
Path B cannot logically be used, as a willful plan, to get back to Plan A.
Who says it can? Why do they say such things? Is it a good idea or a bad idea to believe in such things, without question?
If you are new to my words, then you may not know the following documented fact.
I am going to link the official web page and then I am going to cut and paste the relevant quote, for you to know, if you want to know the truth.
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
When honest productive Americans want to stop traveling down path B, for whatever excuse imaginable that they are currently accepting that path, and they no longer accept the excuses for traveling down that path, and when honest productive Americans decide to travel down path A instead, they will, and not sooner, and not later, they will. I am on path A already, within the limits of my power.
How about you?
Here is a good measure of path B, for those who may want to know the measure of it:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
If you have in-place a replacement for the dollar unit of currency, ready to go when you decide to replace that crime in progress, you then step off Path B, and you then have Path A ready to travel down, so long as the replacement for the dollar is a competition that reaches for the highest quality at the lowest cost.
Path C includes a worse medium of exchange, a lower quality, and higher cost, replacement for the dollar unit of currency, and it can be whatever you are forced to use by your oppressors because you fail to work effectively at reaching the goal of Path A.
Path B is recorded on that Debt Clock, and it is no longer an affordable path, on purpose, as planned, by those who oppress you.
Your oppressors are working toward their goal of ending The Dollar Hegemony and ushering in a New World Order with a new monopoly currency extortion racket, organized crime, cabal.
They may fail, due to their incompetence, and a period of powerlessness may ensue, at terrible cost to the honest productive people who share the planet Earth with the criminals, the same criminals who think morality, and sharing, is a weakness.
Path C works better for your oppressors, with our without their absolute control over the world's supply of legal money.
Path A ends their reign of terror, cuts their credit card, and it is our honest productive form of regime change, if we work to make it our honest productive form of regime change, not something that will happen by accident, not something that will happen as a result of ignorance, or apathy, or stupidity, or by way of fraud, or by way of threats of violence, or by way of violence against the innocent.
You can't reasonably, willfully, and knowingly follow path B, to get to path A, that is insane. How is it working for you so far?