 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone (except those whose interest is willful injury to the innocent),
My offering today concerns a personal episode, one of those lucid dreams, involving a coalescence of perception into one pointed viewpoint; as if a vital piece finally finds its way into the puzzle, and the picture is suddenly unmistakably obvious.
I thought, and now I think, and nothing has yet to challenge this new thought competitively as yet, that the legal criminals will eventually monopolize the insurance industry.
In order to convey to the reader this new viewpoint I can employ specific data such as the link at the top of the page, which constitutes a welcome flow of power from someone who earned that power through his closely connected experiences with the legal crime network; the network known by many names.
1. The Dollar Hegemony
2. The Military Industrial Complex
3. Wall Street
4. The New World Order
5. Legal Crime
Before the reader turns away active, and willful, control of his, or her, personal command of thought, consider, please, focusing attention on specific people who breath air, wear cloths, eat food, and depend, as you do, on their own personal power to survive in this, our, lifetime; as we, the living, still manage to live. Add a personal interest in viewing these things; walk in their shoes, figuratively speaking; make it personal.
In particular, there are people who have more power than you, and there are people who have less power than you, and on that scale the more powerful people are fewer, and the less powerful people are more numerous, and the scale ends up looking like a pyramid, and I am asking you to look closer, for now, at the most powerful people, and look as closely as possible, so close, within your own power, to accurately identify the uppermost powerful people on the planet, as if your intent was to accurately identify the one most powerful person - and then try to be that person for an imaginary length of time, so as to better understand power.
Pyramids on Reality Television (helping to understand the monopoly power structure):
1. Survivor
2. America's Most Wanted
3. American Idol
4. America's Got Talent
5. 2012 Election Cycle
The top one is competitively more powerful, by merit, compared to the next best one, by some measure of some kind. The measure may be fixed, false, rigged, predetermined, but the concept remains obvious.
This is not that difficult of a concept to know; and it is a useful perception. The above intends to employ the principle understanding of individual, competitive, adaptive, advantage, or leverage, toward the accurate identification of the most dangerous threat to the human species - perhaps not something on your own personal top 10 laundry list of things to do, but something of value none the less.
Quote from the link:
It [War] was to protect oil.
You do not have the power to send an all volunteer army, navy, airforce, marines, private corporate mercenary soldiers, support people, food, shelter, clothing, bombs, missiles, truck loads of 100 dollar bills stacked on pallets by the tons, torturers, and mass murderers, on aggressive wars for profit, be your goal oil, be your goal a physical form of power used to back up a fraudulent legal currency monopoly, or be your goal, in your mind, a serial killing for the shear joy of watching massive numbers of innocent people suffer miserably on their ways to early deaths, stacked up onto piles, and piles, of commingled funeral pyres. Place the most innocent on that pyramid top.
Your goal may be simple: to get the most power flowing from anywhere, and everywhere, to you; if you were, accurately measured as, the most powerful one alive.
You are not.
Neither am I.
The goal that is chosen is as competitive a choice as is the individual who commands the power to move toward the chosen goal. Pick the wrong goal, and you may then be the less powerful competitor, for failure to pick the more competitive goal, and then investing all your power digging holes, and then filling them back up. Know the person moving toward the goal, know the actions perpetrated by the person moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be a liar moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be ignorant moving toward the goal, and the goal may become obvious; despite the falsehoods, deceptions, threats of violence, and acts of willful violence perpetrated perpetually upon the innocent victims as those legal criminals move toward their chosen goals.
Which immediately next goal would you willfully move toward if your long term goal was to move up one more level on that power pyramid that does exist in actual reality; presuming to place your viewpoint in the shoes of someone near the top?
It [War] was to protect oil.
I am now here to inform you of a very competitive answer.
Those at the top of the power structure have a few obvious chores to accomplish, and maintain, at the top of their chosen power structure.
1. Move power from those who create power to those who are at the top.
2. Use the power, that has been moved, to keep the power flowing in that direction.
Failure to accomplish those goals will result in two obvious possible results.
1. The people who create power have more power, as less power moves from them, and less power moves to those who move power from those who create power to those who are at the top. The Pyramid flattens out.
2. Someone else moves power from those who create power, to those who move power to the top, power moved from those who create power. Same pyramid, you are not at the top.
Another quote:
They love war, they live this business because it keeps them in power.
Competitive methods by which power flows from those who create power to those who move that power:
1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding)
2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding)
3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment)
4. Voluntary Banking (Saving)
5. Insurance
Please consider using a few examples of actual accounts of power currently flowing from those who create power to those places where power flows; from the many to the few.
1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding)
What happens to you if you decide to stop sending your power to the people who are now confessing their crimes of torture and mass murder for profit? You have forms to fill out, papers to sign, and failure to do so results in specific measures of things done to you, as you are innocent of torture, and you are innocent of mass murder, and you want to remain innocent of those crimes, so you decide to stop lending political support, stop lending psychological support, stop sending physical support, stop sending material support, to people who are, without any doubt, lying, torturing, and mass murdering, pathological serial killers, sycophants, sociopaths, and psychopathic legal criminals, by their well documented deeds, as well as their well documented falsehoods, and their well documented acts, as the screams of the innocent dying perpetuate - you stop empowering them - what happens to you?
2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding)
What happens to you if you find your economical situation turning from a powerful capacity to produce surplus wealth, well above your ability to consume the wealth that you produce, to a situation whereby your power to produce wealth reduces below your current rate of consumption? What happens if you need to borrow from your own good faith and credit; and you find that someone else has borrowed from you, and wasted your power, and someone now tells you that you owe them for the money they borrowed from you, and they say that you owe them interest on the money they borrowed from you, as they take more, and more, and more of your power, and they give that power to their closest associates, and they raise their pay rate, and they reward their most effective associates with bonuses, and bailouts, and then, if their investments do pay off, they hide those profits from you, while they still demand you to pay them for the money they borrowed from you, and they still demand you to pay them interest on the money they borrowed from your capacity, and your power, to produce good faith and credit, and surplus wealth in abundance - what happens to you - what do you do about what happens to you? You give them more when they demand more? How does that end; for lack of a competitive alternative?
You will not find a more accurate explanation of Monopoly Banking Fraud than the paragraph above; and those who support those legal crimes will attack me personally, so as to willfully help perpetuate that very big lie.
The war games are not for oil; they are for anything that will perpetuate the monopoly banking fraud.
3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment)
What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an ability to have a three digit phone number to call in case of fire, injury, accident, or any case of helplessness, or emergency, where you really can use an emergency response, during that unfortunate event?
What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an effort to collect enough funds to accomplish a noble goal, such as charity for the poor, or aid to the sick, or even finance for studies reaching for human cures to human disasters?
What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an armed force of defenders who are ready and able to respond to an attack by a powerful criminal army of aggressors seeking profit at your expense?
What do you call a willful choice to send money to a central location to help build roads, hospitals, libraries, schools, and even businesses that offer shares in their capacity to produce more surplus wealth than they consume?
4. Voluntary Banking (Saving)
That is against the law. If you do find a place to send your power off-shore, out of the country, you may be guilty of money laundering, or some such legal crime. What do you call an effort on your part to secure your own personal supply of surplus wealth; to keep it as valuable as the day you earned it, on into the foreseeable future?
5. Insurance
I am going to reach for another quote before addressing number 5 on that laundry list.
George Washington would not claim us today.
If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not the path that moves the power produced by honest productive Americans, by way of deceit, by way of threats of horrible violence, and by way of horrible violence upon the innocent, to the legal criminals who have a diametrically opposed goal in mind.
George Washington was a turn coat, from the goal of liberty, which is the best insurance against the worst loss known to mankind, to date, as George Washington turned his coat toward aggressive wars for profit; and he confessed that very thing.
If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not repeating the same path that moves in the opposite direction, over, and over, and over again, as if this one time, a different result will occur.
Notice in that Real News Report how the slow learner finally realized that Ronald Regan was the opposite of the false front that was projected in front of his true color?
That is the same old, tired, game, used by the nationalists (Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington when he turned his coat) as they projected the false front of Federalism over their true color, so as to cover up their true legal crimes.
The slow learner has a lot of learning yet to do; despite his extensive experience, hard earned, I suspect, connected deep into legal crime.
On to my story, for you.
Legal crime, the pyramid structure, annexes, or accumulates, or takes-over, or recruits, all competitors into one amalgamated whole. This is not an unfamiliar story.
In Alexander Hamilton's (and his minion George Washington's) day the monopolists annexed the sovereign and separate, competitive, state governments, into one national government, one consolidated government, one indivisible union, and the punishment for failure to obey, was, and is, aggressive violence perpetrated upon you, for profit of the perpetrators, or their employers.
What happens when you choose to employ other people to work toward your own injury, and you employ the same people to injure your loved ones - what does that make you in fact, how do you measure up precisely as a competitor, to say, someone seeking liberty?
George Washington conscripted a national army and invaded Pennsylvania to enforce the legal money monopoly power, and later, Abraham Lincoln invaded the southern states to enforce the slavery of the slavers, and enforce the slavery of the slaves, in the south. Honest Abe had the north covered.
George Washington's network of slave traders could not allow a competitive money to exist, which would have forced George Washington's network of slave traders to produce higher quality and lower cost money, and thereby reduce their power to conduct aggressive wars for profit, at will.
Abraham Lincoln and his network of slave traders could not allow the competitive slave traders in the south to exist, failure to enforce the involuntary union would have forced the northern slave traders to compete with the southern slave traders, for higher quality, and lower cost enslavement, as slaves would vote with their feet, within their power to do so, loving, or leaving, their chains of enslavement in one place, and moving to a better place. Slaves running from low quality enslavement in the south may run, and find refuge up north, working subsistence wages in industry; while subsistence wage workers up north could run down south, to escape that form of slavery, to replace the slaves flowing up north, working competitive wages in agriculture - if competition was allowed, which it wasn't, and that is the point.
Insurance is the same thing. Which company offers the highest quality insurance, at the lowest cost, while competition forces that move from low quality to high quality, and high cost to low cost?
What happens when the number of insurance providers reduce from the number in existence now, down to three, then two, and then an effective monopoly?
Why call one thing two names; when both things are the same thing?
Republicans
Democrats
Legal Criminals