More - Good News - Good News - Power Independence

Home

Not logged in - Login | Register

Power Independence > Good News > Good News > More

Moderated by: Joe Kelley

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...

New Topic

Printer Friendly

Rating:

Author	Post

Posted: Wed Sep 5th, 2007 09:55 am

Quote

21^st Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070904/ap_on_hi_te/no_more_batteries;_ylt=AuNrAoRHgHZLCW5vBZAJTKms0NUE

"It's a paradigm shift," said Ian Clifford, chief executive of Toronto-based ZENN Motor Co., which has licensed EEStor's invention. "The Achilles' heel to the electric car industry has been energy storage. By all rights, this would make internal combustion engines unnecessary."

Clifford's company bought rights to EEStor's technology in August 2005 and expects EEStor to start shipping the battery replacement later this year for use in ZENN Motor's short-range, low-speed vehicles.

The technology also could help invigorate the renewable-energy sector by providing efficient, lightning-fast storage for solar power, or, on a small scale, a flash-charge for cell phones and laptops.

Quote

Posted: Wed Sep 5th, 2007 08:57 pm

Quote

22^nd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://panaceauniversity.org/

The purpose of this web site is to provide you with an introduction to a series of devices which have been shown to have very interesting properties and some are (incorrectly) described as 'perpetual motion' machines.

What's that you say - perpetual motion is impossible? My, you're a difficult one to please. The electrons in the molecules of rock formations have been orbiting steadily for millions of years without stopping - at what point will you agree that they are in perpetual motion?

Quote

Posted: Wed Sep 5th, 2007 09:34 pm

Quote

23^rd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://panaceauniversity.org/P7.PDF

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=WFC+Water+Fuel+Cell+Sid+Meyer

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=432&sid=b8824b026d244f5d5b4c33b81b924c6b

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Water_as_fuel

After hours of discussion between ourselves, we concluded that Stan Meyer did appear to have discovered an entirely new method for splitting water which showed few of the characteristics of classical electrolysis. Possible Theory On How The Water Fuel Cell Works (http://www.waterfuelcell.org/concept.html) Confirmation that his devices actually do work come from his collection of granted US patents on various parts of the WFC system. Since they were granted under Section 101 by the US Patent Office, the hardware involved in the patents has been examined experimentally by US Patent Office experts and their seconded experts and all the claims have been established.

It should be remarked that neither Meyer, nor Laughton, nor Griffin, nor Hindley have published any peer-reviewed research papers in the scientific literature (as far as can be reviewed on ScienceDirect), which is detrimental to their credibility.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Michael+Laughton+WFC

Also after Mr. Meyers death where did all his equipment go including his dune buggy converted to run on hydrogen?
Why didn’t it all go to his twin brother to continue his work?
Because it was seized by the Federal government.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Admiral+Sir+Anthony+Griffin+WFC

http://www.rexresearch.com/meyerhy/meyerhy.htm

Stanley Meyer, Water-Fuel Cell Inventor & Promoter, Dies Suddenly
by Eugene Mallove

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove

Eugene Mallove was fatally beaten May 14, 2004 in Norwich, Connecticut, while cleaning a recently vacated rental property owned by his parents, the home he grew up in. Although the nature of Mallove's work led to some conspiracy theories [1] regarding the homicide, police suspected robbery was the motive.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dr.+Keith+Hindley

http://www.theconspiracy.us/cati3/0035.html

"The most remarkable observation is that the WFC and all its
metal pipework remained quite cold to the touch, even after more
than twenty minutes of operation.   The splitting mechanism
clearly evolves little heat in sharp contrast to electrolysis
where the electrolyte warms up quickly."

"The results appear to suggest efficient and controllable gas
production that responds rapidly to demand and yet is safe in
operation. We clearly saw how increasing and decreasing the
voltage is used to control gas production.   We saw how gas
generation ceased and then began again instantly as the voltage
driving circuit was switched off and then on again."

"After hours of discussion between ourselves, we concluded that
Steve Meyer did appear to have discovered an entirely new method
for splitting water which showed few of the characteristics of
classical electrolysis. Confirmation that his devices actually
do work come from his collection of granted US patents on various
parts of the WFC system. Since they were granted under Section
101 by the US Patent Office, the hardware involved in the patents
has been examined experimentally by US Patent Office experts and
their seconded experts and all the claims have been established."

"The basic WFC was subjected to three years of testing.   This
raises the granted patents to the level of independent, critical,
scientific and engineering confirmation that the devices actually
perform as claimed."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY-AS13fl30

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/WFCprojects/Video/Project_Energy.wmv

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=110

However, if Stan did indeed have a water fuel cell which functioned as he claimed, I am much more inclined to think Stan was poisoned and the coroner was paid off to make it look like a natural death.

Since the coroner (William R. Adrion) had exclusive access to the body, no one else verified his findings, and he could have said virtually anything about the manner in which Stan died. However, the coroner’s report is required to have information regarding the circumstances surrounding the death...and there were many witnesses. In other words, while the manner in which Stan died could not be corroborated by anyone else, and thus could be faked, the circumstances surrounding his death had witnesses, and thus, could not be faked.

In this section, it reads: "Decedent supposedly at lunch with N.A.T.O. officials at a Cracker Barrel diner. The group made an opening toast with cranberry juice, immediately after which, decedent ran outside followed by his brother, then vomited violently and told his brother that he had been poisoned."

I find it interesting that the coroner writes, "supposedly." I wonder how many other reports he puts "supposedly" on. It is an unprofessional and unusual statement of disbelief. To me this is the coroner's way of saying to the public, "it is doubtful," which is completely unnecessary and makes me feel like he is trying to lead you away from believing the material in this section which he was forced to write truthfully.

I would love to know more of the story behind what happened that night. Steve Meyer watched as his brother vomited and lay dieing before his eyes. What does he belive? Is Steve carrying on Stan's work, but in a different format...one that could possibly get its foot in the door of big oil?

http://www.xogen.ca/

Xogen Technologies Inc. is a young, aggressive company who is currently developing an innovative technology for the treatment of wastewater.

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=550#550

He post this video that is a roughly 2 hr. presentation on free-energy by Peter Lindemann at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6183263096342406828

I watched it and I have seen the change of the world before my eyes.
It will give you a good perspective on the science involved with Stanley's WFC and other inventers around the world. It seems Peter is onto a working theroy of some sort. It seems so he has published, he mentioned a book or two. Watching the video will help you get a handle on the new thinking we must force ourselves to adopt and teach our apprentices and students. Please pay attention to the security issues we face.

Dr. Peter Lindemann is one smart cookie you can view his site at:
http://www.free-energy.cc

We're sorry, but this video may not be available

http://www.free-energy.cc/

On the PRODUCTS page of this website, you will find our very exciting information products about real free energy systems. First and foremost, we have the book and video titled The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity, by Dr. Peter Lindemann. This material covers the complete explanation of how inventor Edwin Gray, Sr. produced what he called "Cold Electricity". In the early 1970's, Ed Gray demonstrated an 80-horsepower electric automobile engine that could recharge it's own batteries. He also developed a solid-state power supply that could power your home from batteries that stayed charged forever. Dr. Lindemann also reveals that Nikola Tesla discovered the same effect, back in 1889, and named it "Radiant Energy." We also offer The History of the E.V. Gray Motor, a two-hour video presentation, showing two of Ed Gray's original prototypes, and their complete inner workings. And finally, The World of Free Energy, a two-hour videotaped lecture and slideshow, also by Dr. Lindemann, featuring information on about seven different free energy technologies.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dave+Lawton+on+the+WFC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOGAkRkCWfA&mode=related&search=

http://www.opensourceenergy.org/_layouts/apps/vplayer2.asp?vID=19

http://www.free-energy.ws/products.html

The World of Free Energy by Peter A. Lindemann, D.Sc.
Dr. Lindemann does it again! In his landmark presentation at the KeelyNet Conference in June 2001, Dr. Lindemann gives an up-date on the Ed Gray EMA motor power supply, as well as show: John Bedini's motor designs that recharge their own batteries, Bill Muller's low drag generators, Dr. Robert Adams' magnetic heaters, Tom Bearden's MEG and other magnet powered transformers, the amazing "ChemAlloy" that spontaneously dissociates water, Stan Meyer's water fuel-cell designs and their spin-off at Xogen, and much, much more. This video has more information on more Free Energy systems than has ever been released to the public before. A must for serious Free Energy researchers worldwide!

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:27 amWhile getting up to date on the open source effort to reproduce Stans technology I found another paper; number 42 at:
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Stan_Meyer_Full_Data.pdf it is Patrick Kelly's Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices at panaceauniversity.org

It contains enough disclosure for me to understand Stans system much better thanks to my recent studies with John.
It is titled Water Fuel Cell Technical Brief and was given to Patrick by a very nervous guy that would not post it himself for fear of reprisals.
By the looks of the document it appears to be genuine.

Too return to this investigation:

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=625#625

Last edited on Wed Sep 5th, 2007 11:12 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 10th, 2007 02:17 pm

Quote

24^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://mariahpower.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=35

Windspire is a low-cost, easy-to-install wind power appliance that provides a safe and attractive method for harnessing power from the wind. At only 30 feet tall and 2 feet wide, Windspire is safe for birds and people, and is distinguished by its sleek propeller-free design, silent operation, rugged construction, simple installation and affordable pricing. Designed for operation where we live and work, it sells for $3,995.00 and comes complete with the inverter, poles, and an installation kit.

Power from Advanced Technology - Mariah Power’s patented technology includes a rotor, generator, and inverter designed as a complete system to optimize the conversion of wind energy into electricity. The 1kW (1 kilowatt, or 1,000 watts) Windspire will produce approximately 1900* kilowatt hours per year in 12 mile per hour average winds. The Windspire also includes an internal wireless modem that can continuously transmit power production information directly to your computer so you can check your power production at any time.

What does that mean?

How about another search to see the average montly rate of electric power consumption.

Power is measured as kilowatts.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/

Energy, Power, and Force are all based upon mass, displacment (movement from one place to another place), and time. The standard unit of time is one second. Energy, Power, and Force can be converted when TIME is understood.

This time I'm going to focus on one MONTH as the time factor.

Keep in mind: How much does it cost and how much does it produce.

So...google for Average Electric Power Consumption

How about this one:

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/BoiLu.shtml

"A kilowatt-hour is the electrical energy consumed in one hour at the constant rate of one kilowatt. The average household in the United States uses about 8,900 kilowatt-hours of electricity each year."

Power is defined as the rate at which work is done or energy is consumed. The formula for average power is acquired by dividing work by the time needed to perform work: P = W/t. Power has units of newton-meters per second or joules per second or watts.

The electric power produced for our residences come from power plants through a power distribution grid. The electric power derives from a power site within the power plant. The power site of a power system consists of a central mover like a turbine that is then pushed by water or steam to run a system of generators.

The amount of power that a household consumes depends on how many appliances there areand the amount of time they are in use. Some appliances or machineries take a lot of energy to operate, so it will result in more use of power.

Those are a lot of words and life it short.

Numbers:

$3,995.00

That is the Price (the cost to produce the generator is not the same thing as the price) and that is the cost to you the consumer.

Output for $3,995.00 is:

1900* kilowatt hours per year (stick with YEAR for now instead of MONTH)

4 thousand buys 1900 kilowatt hours

Average demand or rate of consumption is:

8,900 kilowatt-hours per year.

You can do whatever math you want while I am going to calculate how much it would cost to more than double the production of electricity and sell the excess electricity.

Producing more than double the average home rate of consumption:

20,000 kilowatt-hours per year.

I need the number of wind generators needed to produce 20,000 kilowatt-hours per year:

20,000 divided by 2000 (rounding up) = 10

See how easy this is?

It cost $4,000 for each wind generator so I spend $40,000 (4 times 10) to produce twice (rounding) my annual consumption of electricity.

We pay about 100 dollars a month average and electricity is about .13 cents per kilowatt-hour.

This is, of course, very rough estimating; however - I turn my house into a 50 dollar a month electricity farm for the cost of $40,000 dollars.

I use the 50 dollar a month income figure because I sell my excess electricity at half price to my neighbor (the electric company does not buy electricity from individual home producers currently).

50 dollars divides into 40,000 to find how much time it takes to pay off my investment. 800 months or 67 years.

You can look at this another way. I save my own 100 dollars per month that would be sent to the electric company and suppose I soak my neighbor and charge him the full 100 dollars?

200 dollars divides into 40,000 to find how much time it takes to pay off my investment.

That is 200.

200 months is 17 years.

That is another way of looking at this power independence stuff.

Instead of selling the excess production to your neighbor what happens if you buy an electric car instead and will the car use up all of your excess electricity and/or will you no longer have a gasoline bill and no longer have an electric bill and pay off your loan (to yourself) after 17 years?

In my view the market has yet to realize a need to produce more because more is better.

Rather than buy 10 low output producers there is economy in producing more with less. Does that make sense. There is also a need to diversify and split the investment between Solar Panels and Wind Generators.

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 10th, 2007 11:28 pm

Quote

25^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/09/07/electric.car.batteries.ap/index.html

CNN pulled it so:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/03/eestor_capacito_1.php

Battery-like device could power electric cars
"It's a paradigm shift," said Ian Clifford, chief executive of Toronto-based ZENN Motor Co., which has licensed EEStor's invention. "The Achilles' heel to the electric car industry has been energy storage. By all rights, this would make internal combustion engines unnecessary."

Last edited on Mon Jan 7th, 2008 07:44 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2007 01:52 pm

Quote

26^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,505318,00.html

All too aware of the raging climate change debate, automakers are hailing themselves as masters of energy efficiency at Frankfurt's International Motor Show this week. Suddenly, Germany's car industry has gone green: Complicated diesel hybrids are no longer too expensive and even electric cars are being given a new lease on life.

But the German GM subsidiary will have put the pedal to the metal, because the new type of battery has also sparked the interest of other carmakers. Mercedes is on the verge of mass producing an electric version of its small city model the Smart and Volkswagen will present its own urban car at the IAA. With its motor in the trunk, an electric version is already in the works.

Quote

Posted: Fri Sep 14th, 2007 12:58 pm

Quote

27^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.physorg.com/news108822085.html

Physicists at UC Riverside have created molecular positronium, an entirely new object in the laboratory. Briefly stable, each molecule is made up of a pair of electrons and a pair of their antiparticles, called positrons.

Matter, the “stuff” that every known object is made of, and antimatter cannot co-exist close to each other for more than a very small measure of time because they annihilate each other to release enormous amounts of energy in the form of gamma radiation. The apparent asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is an unsolved problem in physics.

Currently, antimatter finds use in medicine where it helps identify diseases with the Positron Emission Tomography or PET scan.

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 17th, 2007 01:10 pm

Quote

28^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZxTvS-kyHzs

A small history lesson:

A. Declaration of independence 1776

Independence from legal crime

B. Articles of Confederation 1777 - 1781 - 1789

Voluntary Union of Sovereign States

C. Remove the Invading Criminal Army 1776 - 1783

Voluntary Union of Sovereign States defeats the invading British Army with a VOLUNTARY army of free sovereign people.

D. Shays' Rebellion Suppressed Illegally 1786 - 1787

Western Massachusetts free sovereign people are defeated as they defend themselves against an illegal invading army of criminals who usurped the Massachusetts State Government.

E. United States Constitution 1789 - 1913

Illegal usurpation of the Articles of Confederation by criminals pretending to be federalists.

Example:

Article I

Section 8

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Do you know what that means?

"suppress Inurrections"

How soon can a person forget something important?

Back to the Declaration of Independence:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The tax revolt in Massachusetts was LEGAL, PEACEFUL, and RIGHT. The suppression of the tax revolt was ILLEGAL under the Articles of Confederation (The LAW of the LAND when the people drove out the illegal British Army who were suppressing a tax revolt).

The Articles of Confederation did not make SUPPRESSION of a tax revolt LEGAL.

The U.S. Constitution (usurpation by criminals) made SUPPRESSION of a tax revolt LEGAL.

AGAIN:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

That above is a justification of defense against involutary taxation, invasion, slavery, and all legal crimes.

What is the following?

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Above is legal crime.

Skeptical?

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html

And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit;

Therefore, and in pursuance of the proviso above recited, I. George Washington, President of the United States, do hereby command all persons, being insurgents, as aforesaid, and all others whom it may concern, on or before the 1st day of September next to disperse and retire peaceably to their respective abodes. And I do moreover warn all persons whomsoever against aiding, abetting, or comforting the perpetrators of the aforesaid treasonable acts; and do require all officers and other citizens, according to their respective duties and the laws of the land, to exert their utmost endeavors to prevent and suppress such dangerous proceedings.

In testimony whereof I have caused the seal of the United States of America to be affixed to these presents, and signed the same with my hand. Done at the city of Philadelphia the seventh day of August, one thousand seven hundred and ninety- four, and of the independence of the United States of America the nineteenth.

G. WASHINGTON,
By the President, Edm. Randolph

GW invaded western Pennsylvania and crushed a tax revolt.

GW could not have legally done so under the Articles of Confederation.

Again:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

That is POWER INDEPENDENCE.

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 17th, 2007 01:14 pm

Quote

29^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance120.html

September 17th was so designated because it is the anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. In fact, this year is somewhat special because it is the 220th anniversary of that event. But what if, instead of being a cause for celebration, the adoption of the Constitution was "the most successful fraud in American history"?

Knowledge and Falsehood are POWERS commanded by honest human beings and CRIMINALS.

When one POWER is earned the other POWERS can be secured:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18397.htm

AMERICA’s elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.

By Graham Paterson

09/16/07 "The Times" -- - AMERICA’s elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 17th, 2007 01:25 pm

Quote

30^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north445.html

AND THE WINNER IS. . . .
James Madison and his unindicted co-conspirators.
First, the perpetrator who designs the fraud and then executes it is subsequently hailed by the victims as a hero, a genius, and indispensable to their own well-being.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18403.htm
POWER?

It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. ... Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things, which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Quote

Posted: Thu Sep 20th, 2007 05:42 am

Quote

31^st Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=4764.msg28575;topicseen#msg28575

There is Daniel Dingel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVhXrvCCILw

Then there is Stan Meyer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIgOn1kRw5s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcy3JbGjQwo
Soon after the last video Stan Meyer was poisoned.
See: http://www.waterpoweredcar.com

Then there is John Kanzius from this summer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6vSxR6UKFM

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Joe_Cell:Validation

Validation

Directory of validations and related resources pertaining to the Joe Cell Replication Project.

NO VALIDATION AS OF JAN. 15, 2007.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=joe+cell&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=orgone&hl=en

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Joe_Cell:Replications

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Joe_Cell:Replications:Bill_Williams

Joe Cell Truck Builder Threatened, Destroys Plans

(http://pesn.com/2006/04/13/9600257_Bill_Williams_threatened/) - After announcing that he had successfully built a truck that runs on Joe Cell technology, drawing energy from water and Orgone, Bill Williams said he was approached by two men who requested that he stop his research, threatening him with dire consequences if he didn't. Others are keeping it alive. (PESN; Apr. 13, 2006)

Note: I am not making this stuff up. You, the reader, can make of this what you will.

http://pesn.com/2006/06/23/9500285_Peter_Stevens_validation_required/

It should be noted as well that several independent offers of cash were made (two for US $10,000) for the first successful validation.

Considering the coverage that this episode has been garnering among those who circulate in the cutting-edge energy technology circles, it seems implausible that there has not been at least one person come forward to produce validation of the technology that Stevens makes to sound fairly straightforward and which is allegedly presently implemented on a substantial number of vehicles -- if such claim has basis in truth.

As a result of this delay, which at this point seems inexcusable considering the claims made and the number of people working on replications, the New Energy Congress is withdrawing its invitation to Peter Stevens if he does not provide a validation by June 29, either of his test bed or of one of his associates' vehicles running on the Joe cell alone. In his place, NEC will host a related presentation for the same time and place in Salt Lake City.

If Stevens completes a validation after June 29 and prior to July 28, then the invitation for July 30 will be re-issued; and if accepted, the original plan will be renewed.

NEC encourages cutting-edge energy research, allowing inventors adequate space to bring forth their creations, but does not believe it to be good policy to propagate claims for which adequate validation has not been produced under reasonable conditions.

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/New_Energy_Congress

Shortcut URL
http://newenergycongress.org

Mission Statement
The New Energy Congress is an association for the purpose of reviewing the most promising claims to up-and-coming clean, renewable, affordable, reliable energy technologies, in order to come up with a weighted list of recommendations of the best technologies. (Unanimously approved by NEC; Dec. 10, 2005)

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Top_100_Technologies_--_RD
Congress:Top 100 Technologies -- RD

Number ONE:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Stirling_Energy_Systems

President Bush selected the Sandia National Laboratories location as a backdrop for his signing of the Energy bill Aug. 8, 2005, with Stirling Engine Systems solar arrays in view at the facility. The 500 MW purchase agreement with Southern California Edison was signed the next day on Aug. 9, 2005.

Number TWO:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Eneco_power_chip

The Company has already undertaken contracts for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the U.S. Navy, and the National Science Foundation with support from US Magnesium Corp. A number of leading organizations and companies are negotiating with ENECO to develop products specific for their requirements.

Note: I'm not making this stuff up. DARPA?

Number Three:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:MIT_Nanotube_Super_Capacitor

Rechargable and disposable batteries use a chemical reaction to produce energy. The problem is that after many charges and discharges the battery loses capacity to the point where the user has to discard it.

However, capacitors contain energy as an electric field of charged particles created by two metal electrodes. Capacitors charge faster and last longer than normal batteries.

The problem is that storage capacity is proportional to the surface area of the battery's electrodes, so even today's most powerful capacitors hold 25 times less energy than similarly sized standard chemical batteries.

MIT researchers have solved this by covering the electrodes with millions of nanotubes, which are essentially tiny filaments. The nanotube filaments increase the surface area of the electrodes and allow the capacitor to store more energy.

The MIT capacitor thus combines the strength of today's batteries with the longevity and speed of capacitors.

Prototype expected to be finished in the next few months.

Commercialization could be less than five years away

Number Four:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:EEStore

New ceramic battery may replace gas engines by 2008.

Texas company is working on an "energy storage" device made from ceramics. It's not technically a battery because it doesn't use chemicals. It can allegedly charge within 5 minutes with enough energy to move a car 500 miles on about $9 worth of electricity -- about 45 cents a gallon.

According to the patent, the device is made of a ceramic powder coated with aluminum oxide and glass.

Company is very secretive, and has taken down its website.

"A ceramic power source for electric cars that could blow away the combustion engine." (CNN (http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/15/technology/disruptors_eestor.biz2/index.htm); Sept. 20, 2006)

Number 5:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Vivian_Alberts_thin_film_solar

Source: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/02/south_africa_pi.php

Apparently the technology resulted from over 10 years of research, led by Professor Vivian Alberts of the University of Johannesburg. He and his team seem to have developed a flexible, thin, metal alloy that is “photo-responsive‿. This alloy is said to result in panels with are only 5 micron thick (compared to a human hair at 20 micrometers, and silicon photovoltaic cells at 350 micrometers.) Earlier reports (in 2004) indicated the alloy was copper-indium(gallium)-diselenide (CIGS), with another article inferring the panels would have a useful life of about 20 years, with the energy in fabricating them recovered within the first 1-2 years of operation. And that the materials used could all be later recycled to make fresh cells. It is said that a standard family home would need around 30m/sq (“(about the size of a living room‿) of CIGS solar panels to meet all its electricity demands.

Unspecified new storage devices (batteries of some sort) and converters have been created alongside these new cells to store the collected energy. It is suggested these new panels can generate electricity even during winter, not requiring direct sunlight to function. Seemingly German investors are behind establishing European plants, which will be producing 1,000 such panels per day, with local South African factories also be contemplated. Much Thanks to TH Tipster Conrad Z. for pointing us to the piece in the ::Cape Argus.

Last edited on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 08:57 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Thu Sep 20th, 2007 09:15 am

Quote

32^nd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

Continued:

Number Six:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Wind_Farms

A wind farm is a collection of wind turbines in the same location and used for the generation of wind power electricity.

Wind farms present an economy of scale along with an efficiency factor that enable them to produce electricity in the price range of conventional energy sources, and hence compete with conventional grid power.

Note: "Conventional Grid Power" is currently produced by burning coal.

Like this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_generation

Note: Coal costs a lot of something to mine, ship, and consume in the process of generating electricity. Wind is farmed into electricity with windmills. How long does wind last?

How long does a wind turbine last?

Number seven:

[url=http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory

ayStar_Technologies]http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory

ayStar_Technologies[/url]

Silicon Free Solar Cells? Bypassing Peak Energy (http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2006/06/silicon-free-solar-cells-bypassing.html) - Daystar Technologies' unique metal foil design is not vulnerable to silicon shortages. At a price approaching grid, production of this thin film design is being ramped up to 20 MW per year. (Al Fin BlogSpot; June 18, 2006)

Note: Farming Sunlight? When does sunlight run out? How many years will a Solar Cell continue to turn sunlight into electricity?

Number eight:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Cool_Earth_Solar

" Our Phase II system will cost (us)
- 18 cents / Watt for materials
- 29 cents / Watt installed in a large solar farm
Compared with $5 / W for conventional solar installations."

Note: That appears to be an 'installation' cost. If the duration of the power output is not factored into cost, then, the cost/benefit analysis is incomplete.

Example:

Suppose a person spent 30,000 units (dollars, euros, Yen, Yaun, ounces of gold, ounces of silver, etc.) to install a generator for his home. If the generator lasts 100 years, then, his children's children continue to get POWER after the 'loan' or the investment (including INTEREST) is long ago PAID IN FULL.

Number nine:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:IAS

International Automated Systems, Inc. (IAUS)

IAUS has brought forward several technologies, including a solar technology. In addition to their fresnel lens and turbine solar technology, they are presently developing a waste-to-energy technology line.

In their solar array, fresnel lenses focus sun's rays to heat water to run a patented high-efficiency turbine. A utility-scale application is in process of being built in Nevada which will compete with grid electricity.

Quote

Posted: Thu Sep 20th, 2007 09:18 am

Quote

33^rd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

Continued:

Number Ten:

[url=http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory

2Fusion%2C_Inc]http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory

2Fusion%2C_Inc[/url].

Company expects to bring cold fusion technology to market as early as Summer, 2007; first in the form of some kind of home heater technology, then with electrical generators for homes. Scientific evidence for supporting this company's claims appears weak, and numerous representations by its founder appear to be highly questionable. (See report (http://www.newenergytimes.com/news/2006/NET16.htm#d21) by cold fusion expert Steven Krivit in New Energy Times May 10, 2006 article.)

Last edited on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 09:19 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Fri Sep 21st, 2007 10:57 am

Quote

34^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Democrats_vote_to_condemn_MoveOn_0920.html

Que es muy MACHO!

Quote

Posted: Fri Sep 21st, 2007 11:57 am

Quote

35^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/sep/20/guardianweeklytechnologysection.comment1

Open Source is what - exactly?

Firefox, the browser that dared to challenge the supremacy of Microsoft's Internet Explorer, has just reached 400m downloads - and deservedly so. It now claims a market share of nearly 20% in the UK and 30% in Germany. Firefox, part of the admirable Mozilla Foundation, is based on open source, created and improved on by volunteers all over the world. The cooperative spirit that infused the open source movement is now taking over the world as people and corporations collaborate on music, videos, products or the Wikipedia. All of which makes it scandalous that the open source movement has not taken off in the UK as it has in other countries.

Quote

Posted: Tue Sep 25th, 2007 01:10 pm

Quote

36^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/09/industry_week.php

http://www.avasolar.com/

http://www.avasolar.com/news/pressDisplay.php?i=12

In a new 200-megawatt factory, expected to employ up to 500 people, AVA Solar Inc. will start production by the end of next year on the pioneering, patented technology developed by mechanical engineering Professor W.S. Sampath at Colorado State. Based on the average household usage, 200 megawatts will power 40,000 U.S. homes.

Produced at less than $1 per watt, the panels will dramatically reduce the cost of generating solar electricity and could power homes and businesses around the globe with clean energy for roughly the same cost as traditionally generated electricity. The technology is yet another example of Colorado State's leadership in cutting-edge research in the area of alternative energy solutions and sustainability; more than 80 faculty members on campus from all eight colleges are involved in clean energy research, including 25 in the College of Engineering.

Emily.Wilmsen@colostate.edu

Contact for Reporters:
Emily Narvaes Wilmsen
(970) 491-2336

I sent this:

Subject: Cost/Benefit

I just read this:

http://www.avasolar.com/news/pressDisplay.php?i=12

I posted that here:

http://www.power-independence.com/view_topic.php?id=262&forum_id=4&page=2

I have a few questions that will also be posted on the above site (If I get an answer):

How much will it cost to purchase enough Solar Panels to produce $100 dollars worth of electricity at .13 cents per kilo-watt hour for an average home in an average month?

Example:

$30,000.00

Question two:

How long will the solar panels continue to produce $100 dollars worth of electricity at .13 cents per kilo-watt our for an average home in an average month?

Example:

30 years

I can then compute:

30 times 12 times 100 equals:

$36,000.00

So…I call up and get the ball rolling. I earn 6,000 in 30 years (assuming the price of electricity remains at .13 cents per kilo-watt hour).

Please consider answering my question accurately.

Thanks

Joe

I add the request for accuracy since my experience has been to receive answers to questions I didn't ask or non-answers.