Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Independent Presidential Debate Coverage

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Independent Presidential Debate Coverage  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Jun 7th, 2007 12:29 pm
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_21285157.shtml

Fixing The Presidential Debates
By Jonathan David Morris
Jun 7, 2007


 

Does anyone have a link to the republican debate on June 6 (uncut)?

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 7th, 2007 12:35 pm
  PM Quote Reply
22nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Google for

uncut republican debate june 6:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=uncut+republican+debate+june+6

http://video.aol.com/video/iran-a-focus-of-republican-debate/1920797

Advert...your video will play shortly

 

Is it no wonder that the ad was for drugs?


What the hell happened to the war on drugs?

While I typed the above the video ended. It can't be UNCUT.

Is that akin to 'false advertisement'?

What every happend to the war on fraud?

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Jun 7th, 2007 12:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
23rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I typed into Google:

Ron Paul June 6 Debate

I do that because Ron Paul is the honest ONE. The other's are criminals. That is my spin. I'd rather get the whole debate and then spin it as you, the reader, have the whole debate to spin in your own way.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=y72Qz6A5CFE

I'm going to watch that while I wait for our global society to produce the uncut version of the debate. I can't do this myself.

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 7th, 2007 01:08 pm
  PM Quote Reply
24th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/debates/scorecard/gop.debate/results.html?userpick_q7=cand_7&userpick_q6=cand_7&userpick_q5=cand_7&userpick_q4=cand_6&userpick_q3=cand_7&userpick_q2=cand_7&userpick_q1=cand_7

I took the poll and after my vote the results show this:

Ron Paul (58%)

58%, according to that poll, place Ron Paul as the Debate winner.

 

10:04 AM June 07, 2007

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 8th, 2007 11:54 am
  PM Quote Reply
25th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts213.html

One indication would be the response of presidential candidates to the gratuitous and failed war. What we saw at the Republican presidential candidates’ debate on June 5 is inconsistent with the self-esteem of the American people. All of the leading Republican presidential candidates openly and nonchalantly endorsed using nuclear weapons against Iran unless Iran abandons its right to enrich uranium under the non-proliferation treaty, to which Iran is a signatory (unlike nuclear-armed Israel, India, and US puppet Pakistan).

 

Note: Ron Paul is the only "Leading" candidate. He is openly against aggressive war.

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 8th, 2007 04:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
26th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/06/nuking_iran_the_republican_age_1.html#more

Only Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, the "Dennis the Menace" of his party, said he opposed a nuclear strike on moral grounds and because he believed Iran "has done no harm to us directly and is no threat to our national security."

 

Note the psychological behavior modification technique.

If you need me to point it out, then, you may be too far gone.

Consider how the only person who is not advocating the mass torturous murder of millions of innocent people for generations on end has been labeled as a ‘menace’.

Ron Paul is a ‘menace’ to falsehood i.e. he has the audacity to tell the truth and stand on moral principle.

Imagine that!

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jun 9th, 2007 02:56 pm
  PM Quote Reply
27th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://restoretherepublic.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=11&Itemid=53

Independent and powerful forces are at work in our human existence. Don't let anyone dictate your focus of attention away from it.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jun 9th, 2007 04:00 pm
  PM Quote Reply
28th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17851.htm

Lies, Sighs and Politics

By Paul Krugman

06/08/07 "
New York Times" -- -- In Tuesday’s Republican presidential debate, Mitt Romney completely misrepresented how we ended up in Iraq. Later, Mike Huckabee mistakenly claimed that it was Ronald Reagan’s birthday.

Guess which remark The Washington Post identified as the “gaffe of the night”?


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jun 9th, 2007 04:17 pm
  PM Quote Reply
29th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://independentskeptic.blogspot.com/2007/06/democrats-were-in-new-hampshire-tonight.html

CNN's coverage was loaded with second-rate commentary.

 

People abusing power can impoverish, torture, maim, and kill millions upon millions of innocent human beings; therefore – it is necessary for innocent human beings to avoid misery, death, and destruction by limiting people abusing power.

That may not be easy to understand. That is the beginning of first rate commentary.

Among the possible candidates that will be in a position to abuse power are three who do not openly proclaim to anyone having an interest in their open claims, that, they will abuse power, they will torture, they will maim, and they will kill innocent people AT THE DROP OF A HAT.

Of the many there are three who have not PROMISED to torture, maim, kill, and abuse power once they get their greedy hands upon it.

There you have it. There you have first rate commentary.

Of all the candidates that can gain power there are three who are not proclaiming criminal intent.

That means, for those who have brains, that only three (if you don’t count me) are NOT CRIMINALS.

You can limit the abuse of power; if you have a conscience. Do not vote for people who PROMISE to commit crimes against humanity.

See how easy it can be?

 

Last edited on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 04:17 pm by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Jun 11th, 2007 01:58 am
  PM Quote Reply
30th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.campaignnetwork.org/

Road to the White House:


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Jun 12th, 2007 11:52 am
  PM Quote Reply
31st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Independent Presidential Debate Coverage?

http://www.demsforronpaul.org/

Ron Paul on the Daily Show

http://www.demsforronpaul.org/

June 13th Ron Paul Appears on The Colbert Report on Comedy Central

 

Has anyone seen Steve Colbert roast the crimnal Bush? How about a search?

Stephen Colbert roasts Bush

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Stephen+Colbert+roasts+Bush 

You can watch it; don't be afraid.

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Jun 12th, 2007 01:23 pm
  PM Quote Reply
32nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster122.html

no other candidate can offer: intellectual honesty instead of rehearsed responses

 

I quote the above here as an example of someone spreading falsehood.

Someone spreading falsehood is akin to a Troll under a bridge or akin to The Taxman.

The troll excludes people from knowledge.

Example:

If I report how no one other than Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are honest candidates, then, I leave out (stop anyone crossing the bridge to) Mike Gravel.

I become the troll.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2007 03:26 pm
  PM Quote Reply
33rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_gops_lonely_antiwar_candidate

Surely one of the highlights of the presidential primary debates held so far occurred back in mid-May, during the Republican debate in South Carolina: Ten-term Texas Congressman Ron Paul stood in front of a patriotic field of white stars on a blue backdrop and told Fox News correspondent Wendell Goler that the attacks of 9/11 occurred primarily as a response to U.S. foreign policy over the past few decades. "Have you ever read about the reasons they attacked us?" he asked incredulously. "They attacked us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for ten years!"

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2007 03:44 pm
  PM Quote Reply
34th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17873.htm

The lie was repeated on June 5 by Republican Mitt Romney, word for word, and was unchallenged by any other candidate for the devalued post of president of Washington-on-Oil. The commentator Larry Beihart recounts that "Wolf Blitzer, moderating the debate didn't correct him. The so-called journalists asking questions didn't seem to notice. The CNN post debate commentators didn't mention it. The New York Times and The Washington Post, in today's stories on the debate, didn't mention it. A web search this morning [June 6] didn't reveal any comments on Romney's astounding statement."

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Jun 18th, 2007 11:51 am
  PM Quote Reply
35th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north538.html

THE WEB PHENOMENON

After the first debate among the ten Republican candidates, the mainstream media’s polls ranked Giuliani, McCain, and Romney as the front-runners. But the on-line polls were blow-outs for Ron Paul.

What was going on?

After the second debate, on May 15, broadcast by Fox News, the Fox News website allowed viewers to vote for the nominee. These presumably were hard-core Fox News viewers. Over 40,000 voted. Romney got 29%. Paul got 25%. Giuliani got 19%.

Fox News has been supportive of the Iraq war from the beginning. Paul in 2003 voted against the funding of the Iraq war, one of the handful of Republicans in Congress who did. So, how could it be that Paul, an outspoken critic of the war, could receive that high a percentage on Fox News’ own website?

He had done even better on MSNBC’s website poll after the first debate, broadcast by MSNBC on May 3. The results were amazing. He overwhelmed the others in the four positive categories.

He got even higher percentages on the CNN poll.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2007 04:49 pm
  PM Quote Reply
36th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://grantdwalker.zaadz.com/blog/2007/6/there_will_be_no_election_in_2008

Bush will immediately invoke the powers afforded under his recent Presidential Executive Order, which grants him control over all arms of US government and the American economy. America will become a police state and a draft will be implemented immediately. There will be no election in 2008.

 



 

It cannot be true. Do you understand? It cannot be true because people make sure that it cannot be true.

 

If someone told you that the dollar will crash tomorrow would you go to the bank and withdrawal your savings account today?

 

What if The President asked politely for you to please leave your dollars in the bank for one more day?

 

What would you believe?

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Jul 24th, 2007 12:32 pm
  PM Quote Reply
37th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Citadel_CNN_YouTube_Democratic_debate_0723.html

Obama, Gravel tangle on campaign donations in 2008 'YouTube' debate

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Jul 24th, 2007 12:51 pm
  PM Quote Reply
38th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
How about a Google Search on YouTube debate?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=youtube+debate

Number one:

http://news.google.com/news?q=youtube+debate&hl=en&pwst=1&um=1&sa=X&oi=news_group&resnum=1&ct=title

Number 2:

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/07/24/youtube0724.html

You can do your own search. I'm looking for anything on Kucinich and/or Gravel. The "Others" are proponents of torture and mass murder (YUCK!).

Google for: youtube debate Kuchinich

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&pwst=1&um=1&resnum=1&ct=title&ie=UTF-8&q=youtube+debate+kucinich

... six of the eight candidates took a page from Al Gore by traveling to the debate in a private jet. (Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich were the exceptions. ...

Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio was the only candidate to endorse same-sex marriage, which came up in a video from "Mary" and "Jen" of Brooklyn, who coyly asked ...
Dennis Kucinich urging voters to send an anti-war text message to Congress? He said it once, before Cooper cut him off, and then again later in the debate. ...
 

7:07: A question specifically for Dennis Kucinich... great. Why would he be better than Hillary or any other candidate?

I want to see that one:

http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2007/07/the-youtube-debate.html

Damn; the link goes to an article. I'll look for the whole youtube debate link shortly.

How about Google for: YouTube Debate Direct Link

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&pwst=1&um=1&resnum=1&ct=title&ie=UTF-8&q=youtube+debate+direct+link

Damn; more articles.

How about a Google Search to YouTube and then a Search?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/

Many people already have youtube on their favorites.

Search: Debate

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Debate

That is old stuff (2 months ago)

Search YouTube: YouTube Debate

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=YouTube+Debate&search=Search

Damn; I need to select: Sort by Date

I can't find it.

I can't find the entire debate so I can see for myself how the debate played out in real time.

Anyone?

 

 

 

 


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Jul 24th, 2007 12:58 pm
  PM Quote Reply
39th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxhcOoBXdfs

The CNN/YouTube Debates - Fair Coverage for All

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Jul 24th, 2007 01:01 pm
  PM Quote Reply
40th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=YouTube%20Debate%20Kucinich&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_category=0&search=Search&v=

YouTube Debate Kucinich (from search engine YouTube) above

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-NW4TVcd7Q

Define Liberal?

Gravel claims Obama receives foreign finances (conflict of interest).

How about a search on that?

Google: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Obama+campaign+finance+

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cid=N00009638
No Disclosure: $74,000
http://www.cfinst.org/pr/prRelease.aspx?ReleaseID=155

That one offers some measure of data.

What is needed is a paper trail.

Statistics can be manipulated.

Who sent the money? Who recieved the money?

How much money sent by each individual can 'indicate' something.

Kucinich and Gavel recieved most of their money from people sending less than 200 dollars.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/16/AR2007071601831.html

Campaign finance records released Sunday showed the financial juggernaut that is Obama's candidacy: 258,000 individual donors, support from all over the country and $32.8 million raised over the past three months, $10 million more than Clinton raised for the Democratic primary over that period.

How about a search for: "Campaign finance records released Sunday"?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&pwst=1&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Campaign+finance+records+released+Sunday&spell=1

This is like pulling teeth.

Why is it difficult to get a break down of who paid whom?

Is it me? It must be me. I can easily report who pays me. No one. My wife is working and she pays for this site. She has no interest in what I do on this site beyond an interest in me personally; she is my wife.

Who paid whom and for what?

The nature of a false currency is to erase accontability.

 



Last edited on Tue Jul 24th, 2007 01:25 pm by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 07:47 am Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page    
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Independent Presidential Debate Coverage Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems