 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
YouTube Debate Kucinich (from search engine YouTube) above
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-NW4TVcd7Q
Define Liberal?
Gravel claims Obama receives foreign finances (conflict of interest).
How about a search on that?
Google: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Obama+campaign+finance+
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cid=N00009638
No Disclosure: $74,000
http://www.cfinst.org/pr/prRelease.aspx?ReleaseID=155
That one offers some measure of data.
What is needed is a paper trail.
Statistics can be manipulated.
Who sent the money? Who recieved the money?
How much money sent by each individual can 'indicate' something.
Kucinich and Gavel recieved most of their money from people sending less than 200 dollars.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/16/AR2007071601831.html
Campaign finance records released Sunday showed the financial juggernaut that is Obama's candidacy: 258,000 individual donors, support from all over the country and $32.8 million raised over the past three months, $10 million more than Clinton raised for the Democratic primary over that period.
How about a search for: "Campaign finance records released Sunday"?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&pwst=1&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Campaign+finance+records+released+Sunday&spell=1
This is like pulling teeth.
Why is it difficult to get a break down of who paid whom?
Is it me? It must be me. I can easily report who pays me. No one. My wife is working and she pays for this site. She has no interest in what I do on this site beyond an interest in me personally; she is my wife.
Who paid whom and for what?
The nature of a false currency is to erase accontability.
Last edited on Tue Jul 24th, 2007 01:25 pm by Joe Kelley