Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > No More Legal Criminals

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
No More Legal Criminals  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Wed May 30th, 2007 02:07 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/160029976

The people demanding a legitimate democratic assignment of leadership POWER (that can be revoked by the people) hereby attest to our POWER in numbers.

We hereby assign ourselves as leaders of the free world to be counted as such by any other pretenders to the throne. Any laws made by any one of us will apply to every other of us from now on until the extinction of the human race.

Any one pretending to be above the law will be viewed by us as a person volunteering to go outside the universal law.

Universal law applies to everyone equally and blindly.

We the innocent and law abiding citizens of the world attest to our POWER in enforcing universal law by revoking all licenses now enforcing prejudice of any kind upon the innocent; we do so by signing this public petition.

No longer will the power to punish be wielded by criminals. When our number reaches critical mass - legalized crime will no longer be tolerated. We will throw the criminals out of office. No more. No less.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed May 30th, 2007 02:08 pm
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 Google search for: No More Legal Criminals

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=No+more+legal+criminals

Results 1 - 10 of about 34,200,000 for No more legal criminals.

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed May 30th, 2007 02:28 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://digg.com/world_news/No_More_Legal_Criminals#c6939558

Dugg

 

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 1st, 2007 05:33 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17803.htm

The thing about impeachment, if I can suggest that such a thing can exist in fact, is to stamp legitimacy to the notion that anyone can accuse anyone else of doing anything wrong regardless of how powerful or weak you or your accuser may be at any given moment in time. 

Is this too tough to understand? Example: Person A accuses person B of mass murder that rivals the worst mass murderer in history and/or not wearing a seat belt.  

Person B is investigated and the evidence suggests that the accusation could be true. Such evidence like the following: 

A.      Piles of bodies rotting in the sun.

B.      No obvious or visible seat belt in view as person B passes person A

 

We, the human race, surely can’t afford to chase each other around accusing each other of every possible crime and setting in motion a frantic exponential cost that can never be paid – ever. 

We, the human race, on the other hand can’t afford to let one man start world war three because god told him it was the right thing to do? 

That last question can compare with the previous statement of fact. 

You must be your own judge on this one, cause, the other judges have abdicated.


 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 10:36 am
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=no+more+legal+criminals

Number one on planet Earth.

Before moving on with my chores today I am going to write something in the effort to add some persepctive.

Before anyone even though about signing the Declaration of Independence a writer wrote something called 'Common Sense'.

Here is a bit of common sense:

http://www.ushistory.org/Paine/commonsense/index.htm

SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.

Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.

Here is the Declaration of Independence:

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The people who signed the Declaration of Independence were in on it. I can explain further. Those people didn't have as much to fear as you.

I understand this to be true, yet, I signed.

Why do you not sign?

No pressure. I'm not suggesting that you should sign. It cannot be denied, ever, that the petition did not exist. You can sign it.

You have that choice.

You may not have that choice in the future.

 

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 11:53 am
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 I sometimes read something profound and then I misplace it.

I found it again. Where should I place it?

"The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors.... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'"

 

http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhardt/engelhardt282.html
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Jun 7th, 2007 01:31 pm
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 My petition intends to accomplish something specific.

A. Find out if anyone besides me will sign the petition.

There are a few more accomplishments intended. Those are self-evident too.

 

 

 

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2007 02:49 pm
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 "They might kill me tonight"

http://edbrownvlog.blogspot.com/
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Oct 29th, 2007 07:26 pm
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/LibertyCoalition/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1728&t=Liberty%20Coalition.dwt
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Dec 1st, 2007 08:05 am
  PM Quote Reply
10th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18799.htm

Elections will not prevent a president Clinton from declaring you an enemy combatant and shipping you off to Guantanamo. They won’t prevent a president Obama from sweeping up Americans and holding them indefinitely on his word alone. They won’t prevent a president Guiliani from illegally and immorally murdering millions of Iranians for no legitimate reason. They won’t prevent a president Romney from seizing your home and assets because he alleges you are impeding operations in Iraq. It won’t prevent a president Thompson from exempting himself, his entire administration and his political supporters from the rule of law. It won’t prevent any president from leaving the nation unprotected by ignoring or rewriting the intelligence to suit his or her political agenda. Elections won’t guarantee that anyone you elect to lead or represent you has to tell you, the congress or the judiciary the truth.

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Dec 23rd, 2007 08:43 am
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Anyone,

Either torture and mass murder is cause for impeachment or the rule of law has no meaning.

I think this is a test of ‘the rule of law’.

See? 

How many people will raise their hand if they had to judge the legitimacy of ‘the rule of law’? 

Example: 

Is torture and mass murder cause for action against those acts? 

Yes or No 

If the answer is NO, then, is anything worthy of action against action? 

Seat belt usage 

See? 

Did I lose anyone? 

If action against torturing mass murderers and action that intends, at least, to slow down the torture and decrease the number of mass murdered – at least – if that is not ‘justified’, then, how can enforcing a seat belt law be justified? 

The effort to impeach is not specious or symbolic. The effort intends to do something specific. Is it right or is it not right to accomplish the specific thing intended to be acted out – in fact? 

How about a simplified version? 
  1. Allow the criminal to go on committing crimes
  2. Do something to take away that POWER from that criminal
 

To suggest, if that is the suggestion, that taking away that POWER is criminal, unjustified, or perhaps unreasonable defies my sense of reason. I’m just one potential torture victim who may be murdered by that specific criminal if he pleases to torture or murder me – with impunity. Then again I may merely be another ‘conspiracy theorist’ like, perhaps, Dennis Kucinich, since, he is the one trying to get the trial started – in the senate.  

Ron Paul, on the other hand, is saying that he will do this or do that if he is elected president. Ron Paul is not supporting impeachment. Impeachment is merely a trial conducted in the Senate. No trial – no impeachment. If the criminal is found innocent during the trial, then, either the criminal is supported for his crimes by the senate, or, the criminal isn’t committing crimes. My guess is that a trial in the Senate, at this time, will lead to a conviction by the public at large and the criminals will have to elect a new criminal. My guess is that more trials in the Senate will slow down the torture and the mass murder. The criminals will be too busy falsifying their crimes in the face of public exposure if more trials are conducted in the Senate as directed by the members of the House of Representatives when crimes are suspected such as the evidence may suggest; like torture victims and piles of bodies that have appeared not to have died of natural causes. When the number of torture victims reaches a number were your neighbor or your loved one is among that number, then, I suppose more support will go toward the effort to slow down the torturing. That is my guess. I’m also going to guess that being tortured may also inspire more support against torture. Being murdered is beyond my ability to guess what that may inspire.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2008 12:52 pm
  PM Quote Reply
12th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19305.htm

The use of proxy mercenary forces to terrorize nations into submitting to US political demands has been the cornerstone of American foreign policy since at least the era of the Berlin Wall, and it still is.      

"Terrorism - the use of violence and threats to intimidate or to coerce, esp. for political purposes."             

According to this definition from Dictionary.com, the government of the United States of America is the primary source of state terrorism in the world.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2008 01:10 pm
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.photojournalism.org/2007%20images/web/contest/singles/source/spot_news1.htm
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Feb 21st, 2008 01:07 pm
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/76172/

Since Pelosi, Reid and the other Democratic leaders in Congress appear to be too afraid to hold Bush and Cheney responsible for their numerous crimes, the Vermont town of Brattleboro has taken matters into its own hands:

BRATTLEBORO, Vt. - The tone has changed in e-mails this Vermont town has been receiving on its proposal to issue warrants for the arrests of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Now, more people are supporting the resolution.
Brattleboro's town offices have been flooded with 7,000 e-mails since its selectboard voted Jan. 25 to include the item on its Town Meeting Day agenda.
Some of the earliest messages received were so full of vitriol that town officials said they were worried for their safety. Some writers called Brattleboro a bastion of "liberal appeaser wimps" and "wackjobs" for even considering the warrants.
 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 26th, 2008 09:07 am
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19412.htm

But that's what you get when the cops and judges and prosecutors are the criminals.

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Mar 1st, 2008 06:40 am
  PM Quote Reply
16th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Pelosi_wants_Bush_aides_investigate_02282008.html

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asked the Justice Department on Thursday to open a grand jury investigation into whether President Bush's chief of staff and former counsel should be prosecuted for contempt of Congress.

 

Pot calling the kettle criminal.

 

 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 06:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
17th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
  Too Many Years of a Criminal Regime! 5 Years of Illegitimate War!  End It!  Drive the War Criminals from Office!
 

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1170/t/5806/event/index.jsp?event_KEY=37245
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Apr 11th, 2008 02:12 pm
  PM Quote Reply
18th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
 

http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Apr 14th, 2008 06:34 pm
  PM Quote Reply
19th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 In addition to inquiries into the above grave criminal misconduct and other gross abuses of power, we urge that Judiciary Committee hearings include an inquiry into the use of false propaganda by members of the Bush administration, which has served as the source for articles in the news media that misled many of the people in the United States and elsewhere concerning the supposed “threat” posed by Saddam Hussein and the execution of the war. When our government lies to the people, with the aid of an inept and credulous news media, our democracy is at grave risk.
 

http://restoreruleoflaw.com/#usermessagea
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Apr 16th, 2008 01:15 pm
  PM Quote Reply
20th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 http://condimustgo.com/?utm_source=rgemail
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 11:43 am Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page    
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > No More Legal Criminals Top


UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems