 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
Either torture and mass murder is cause for impeachment or the rule of law has no meaning.
I think this is a test of ‘the rule of law’.
See?
How many people will raise their hand if they had to judge the legitimacy of ‘the rule of law’?
Example:
Is torture and mass murder cause for action against those acts?
Yes or No
If the answer is NO, then, is anything worthy of action against action?
Seat belt usage
See?
Did I lose anyone?
If action against torturing mass murderers and action that intends, at least, to slow down the torture and decrease the number of mass murdered – at least – if that is not ‘justified’, then, how can enforcing a seat belt law be justified?
The effort to impeach is not specious or symbolic. The effort intends to do something specific. Is it right or is it not right to accomplish the specific thing intended to be acted out – in fact?
How about a simplified version?
- Allow the criminal to go on committing crimes
- Do something to take away that POWER from that criminal
To suggest, if that is the suggestion, that taking away that POWER is criminal, unjustified, or perhaps unreasonable defies my sense of reason. I’m just one potential torture victim who may be murdered by that specific criminal if he pleases to torture or murder me – with impunity. Then again I may merely be another ‘conspiracy theorist’ like, perhaps, Dennis Kucinich, since, he is the one trying to get the trial started – in the senate.
Ron Paul, on the other hand, is saying that he will do this or do that if he is elected president. Ron Paul is not supporting impeachment. Impeachment is merely a trial conducted in the Senate. No trial – no impeachment. If the criminal is found innocent during the trial, then, either the criminal is supported for his crimes by the senate, or, the criminal isn’t committing crimes. My guess is that a trial in the Senate, at this time, will lead to a conviction by the public at large and the criminals will have to elect a new criminal. My guess is that more trials in the Senate will slow down the torture and the mass murder. The criminals will be too busy falsifying their crimes in the face of public exposure if more trials are conducted in the Senate as directed by the members of the House of Representatives when crimes are suspected such as the evidence may suggest; like torture victims and piles of bodies that have appeared not to have died of natural causes. When the number of torture victims reaches a number were your neighbor or your loved one is among that number, then, I suppose more support will go toward the effort to slow down the torturing. That is my guess. I’m also going to guess that being tortured may also inspire more support against torture. Being murdered is beyond my ability to guess what that may inspire.