 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The thing about impeachment, if I can suggest that such a thing can exist in fact, is to stamp legitimacy to the notion that anyone can accuse anyone else of doing anything wrong regardless of how powerful or weak you or your accuser may be at any given moment in time.
Is this too tough to understand? Example: Person A accuses person B of mass murder that rivals the worst mass murderer in history and/or not wearing a seat belt.
Person B is investigated and the evidence suggests that the accusation could be true. Such evidence like the following:
A. Piles of bodies rotting in the sun.
B. No obvious or visible seat belt in view as person B passes person A
We, the human race, surely can’t afford to chase each other around accusing each other of every possible crime and setting in motion a frantic exponential cost that can never be paid – ever.
We, the human race, on the other hand can’t afford to let one man start world war three because god told him it was the right thing to do?
That last question can compare with the previous statement of fact.
You must be your own judge on this one, cause, the other judges have abdicated.