Joe Kelley
Administrator
|
bear,
Thanks for the help.
I was out of the house after posting things, and making a deal with my daughter, if she helps clean up the kitchen and bathroom we can then have time for her to learn how to drive a stick shift, which is a car that we are transporting to my niece. So...I didn't have time to finish listening to the link with Chomsky Gore Vidal.
I did not get what was meant with the Black Mail, fully, and now I see a need to actually work on it.
I think both Chomsky and Vidal are probably not going to blow the whistle on the One Legal Money Monopoly, as they may not agree that it exists as a homogenous entity (list of people). I think they believe that the Nation States are as far up the pyramid of power that power goes, no higher, no power that pulls the strings of the Nation States (lists of names).
Gore Vidal says that failure of Japan (and he does not say China) to pay the extortion fee (which is to buy Treasury Bonds) will be punished with higher oil prices (reduced supply), which to me makes sense as Scarceonomics.
We ran into difficulty on Scareonomics (as I see it) on The Daily Paul.
You see no problem with pricing at "that which the market will bear" and I do, but the scale of the market in question may be the problem we have, not being able to recognize the principle.
I don't know.
I will listen to part 3 now to see if I can find this:
Chomsky says he does not entirely agree with Gore's Blackmail statement and goes on to elaborate and explains that the profits made by the client states are the and the flow of capital back to the United States and Britian.
There, in your words, to me is the connection to the source of actual POWER which is the oil.
So I don't know what can be wrong with Gore Vidal's statement. The Dollar Hegemony, Wall Street, New World Order, Washington, The FUND, World Bank, United Nations, International Monetary FUND, whatever, it is Federal Reserve Notes for now, that list of names, those people who have that POWER, those dollars, those people, as Chomsky and Gore Vidal say "us" or "we", that list of people, have control of the POWER, the oil, the POWER over oil, and they can turn off the supply, or turn the supply back on, and if anyone does not follow orders, which amounts to absolute blind obedience to falsehood without question, then those competitors will be turned, co-opted, incorporated, robbed, raided, raped, tortured, crushed, and in any which way rendered power-less, so how is that not blackmail in a literal not a figurative sense?
Extortion - Blackmail: which word is more accurate if the idea is to convey the reality of the events from one person to another so as to avoid any failures to know better as to what exactly it is that is happening?
I will listen to the link now.
I don't know what was controversial as far as Chomsky saying that he does not agree with blackmail. Not the oil, but the profits, to me is a confusion of accurately identifying the greater power that dominates the lesser power, which in this case is the power to create zeros on the legal Monopoly Money Supply, and that power, whichever person, or group, has that power, is the person, or group, that has the power over everyone else, and that is not oil power, not profits, it is not confusing in the least, it is the power of falsehood.
It is the power of deception.
People, too many people, believe that there are no other options other than the one money.
The one fraud money, those list of people who can write those checks, orchestrate all those purchases, and there are money trails, and all that is needed is to follow the one money back to the source, to find those who are buying obedience, call it fraud, call it extortion, call it blackmail, call it profits, call it anything, it is what it is, does what it does, and the proof that it is ONE MONOPOLY POWER is that the quality of the supply of money is not going up, and the cost of the supply of money is not going down, and that happens when there is no competition where any consumer, anywhere, can pick better for worse, and then anther consumer picks better for worse, and then another, and then another, and all those choices from all those consumers constitutes the FORCE that dictates to the many suppliers what the many suppliers have to supply to the consumers or go out of business, or, resort to crime.
I think Chomsky and Gore Vidal are wrong in not pointing the finger at the One Money Monopoly Power, it is "The Empire", and these "Nation States" are the diversions, they are controlled by the One Money Monopoly Power, and the proof, again, demonstrable, irrefutable, proof is the fact that the "Host" Nation has marginally better money than the "Client" Nations.
If Utah, and 11 other States in America, use the power in those States to make more power out of less power, and avoid having their power stolen, and used against them, then they will invent, produce, and maintain a competitive money supply, and if they are Federated into a mutual defensive force, a voluntary "Union", then that would be a better money supply, in direct competition with The Dollar (which is being destroyed on purpose) AND that Federation, with that better money, would be in direct competition with the new World Reserve Currency Power that will emerge out of Asia after the World Money Fraud Power buys, and finishes, and cleans up after, their purchase which is World War III.
If that new Federation then competes with all the other States in the involuntary monopoly Union, all those citizens in the slave states will either migrate, vote with their feet, to the prosperous States, or they will Revolutionize their own States, join the Voluntary Union, or be crushed under the DEBT that will be collected by the new World Money Monopoly Power being run out of Asia, as they hire puppets in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC).
If that is not true, I'd like to know why, but who on this planet can tell me why that is not true?
|
... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 
