Joe Kelley
Administrator
|
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22786.htm
REALITY CHECK
Hi,
My name is Joe Kelley and I am an average Joe, a worn out old laborer with an interest in discriminating wrong from right, true from false, and good from evil. I've had enough of the false stuff that proliferates through the so called "Modern World".
The link above is a report about General Motors, America, China, Politics, and Economy. The link above is about history, the present, and the future.
I'm here now to offer a reality check on that link above as that link above offers its "perspective".
Reading anything that reports doom and gloom without any mention of prosperity for posterity, whatsoever: is cause for concern? Why is the "news" nothing but negation?
Consider reading the entire link above and then take your own time, your own energy, and your own power, in your own command, and decide between looking into some good news and continuing on only a bad news diet.
A. Feed yourself a steady diet of bad news
B. Look at some good news in addition to all the bad news
Where is the good news; you may ask?
I’m going to link four links where the process of creating good news occurs in Modern Times.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Tesla+Motors&aq=f&oq=&aqi=n1g10
That first link counters (reality check) the bad news link at the top of this post. An American inventor, worker, thinker, builder, entrepreneur, human being, named Elon Musk is currently working towards supplying the world with a better automobile. That is being done in America.
That is being done despite all the power that intends to crush competition in the auto industry.
Why is that link, to that good news, missing in the often reported events of Modern Times?
Note the two sentences above; “crush competition” and “missing news” are related: one works with the other to create that "perfect storm".
Tesla Motors must advertise on the free network; because the non-free network is controlled by the powers that crush competition. Tesla can compete for market share despite all the powers that intend to crush competition including the power that “hires” slave laborers.
Much can be reported, as a reality check, concerning Tesla Motors as a good news competitor in Modern Times. The next link intends to add fuel to the fire as another example of good news contending with all the current bad news.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Aptera&aq=f&oq=&aqi=n1g10
That second link reports on another home grown, American, invention and production of a competitive automobile; where the potential to gain market share, despite all the power bearing down on any competition, is real, is current, and is cause for optimism. Why are “news” reports of the failure of GM, the failure of “government bail outs”, the failure of foreign trade policies (outsourcing capital, “capital flight”, to China), and the failure of the American Dream, why, why, why, is all that bad news not offered in concert with the good news?
Think about the future please. At some point the average Jane and average Joe American will need to buy another car. Will the choice be one car only, no choice? Will the choice be a choice between the new Tesla economy car, made in America, and the new Aptera economy car, another one Made in America, or will the choice include new economy cars offered through importation from other places outside of America?
Why will we have a choice at all? Please think about that as I offer link number three.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/oxygen-0731.html
When people only see bad news, I wonder, is the condition desired, or is the condition undesirable? The link above offers more than simple data, more than simple reporting concerning some obscure news item occurring in some irrelevant place, as if nothing matters in the face of all the global doom and gloom.
When major scientific establishments authorize specific discoveries to be valid, to be true, to be worth knowing; should the people of industry listen? The link between the “discovery” at MIT and the car industry is worth looking into, in my opinion, because doing so tends to brighten the future outlook.
Imagine, for example, a future choice offered to Americans as Americans look for their next car, their next car purchase, and the idea occurs to us, us Americans, as we consider the possibility of making our own automobile fuel at home – cheaply. We then have a choice to bypass any connection with the Oil Companies, completely severe that link, or at least the link between transportation, the power to make the car go, and sending our hard earned power, our income, our pay, to the Oil Companies, just so that we can drive from point A to point B, which is more often than not: a drive from home to work and back again.
So many choices, so little time, especially as the work hours grow longer and the pay rate declines.
What do you think will be my next link?
http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-parable-of-perfect-economy.html
When Americans regain their power over money, something that will happen if America is to survive the attack by legal criminals, the fraudulent criminal extortion racket called The Federal Reserve, when we win the battle over our money, we will have a choice to adopt a higher quality money – at a lower cost.
That last link should be read thoroughly by the reader of this post – if the idea is to employ good news in competition with all the bad news.
Please do some homework on this subject matter; you may reap the rewards of that investment instead of engorging yourself on a steady diet of doom and gloom. The power to know the truth is in your hands.
Joe
Last edited on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 11:19 am by Joe Kelley
|
... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 
