Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  ...  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
More  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sat Oct 25th, 2008 08:36 am
  PM Quote Reply
261st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=10&article_id=7201



 

The Model S, an all-new 4-door 5-passenger zero-emissions luxury sedan powered by a lithium-ion battery pack. Unlike the Tesla Roadster, which is built in partnership with Lotus in the U.K. and based on a stretched Elise platform, the Model S will ride on a platform developed by Tesla.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 11:27 am
  PM Quote Reply
262nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/

Scientists at the University of New South Wales have set a new world record by creating the first silicon solar cell to achieve 25% efficiency.

Team leader, Prof. Martin Green of the university’s ARC Photovoltaic Centre of Excellence, says their world-beating solar cell is now a massive six percent more efficient than the next best technology. The record edges the current generation of solar cell technology closer to the theoretical limit of 29% efficiency.



The rise in efficiency is due to new knowledge about the composition of sunlight, leading to an improvement in the solar cell’s ability to capture more energy at the extremes of the solar light spectrum. According to Green, “These light-trapping features make our cells act as if they were much thicker than they are. This already has had an important spin-off in allowing us to work with CSG Solar to develop commercial ‘thin-film’ silicon-on-glass solar cells that are over 100 times thinner than conventional silicon cells.”

Negotiations for commercial production of the latest advancement are already underway, and could soon lead to a new generation of low cost, high energy output solar cells.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 08:59 am
  PM Quote Reply
263rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 


http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/27/first-solar-thermal-plant-in-20-years-launches-in-ca/

Ausra is well known for their claim that 100% of the US electric load (day and night) could be generated in an area that is 92 miles by 92 miles. This is made possible by steam storage, thus allowing solar plants to operate after the sun has set.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Oct 31st, 2008 11:07 am
  PM Quote Reply
264th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/27/china-electric-cars-biz-manufacturing-cx_wp_1027electric.html?feed=rss_news

GM sees China as being among the first markets and production sites for alternative propulsion systems and will continue working to advance its strategy of "in China, with China, for China" to help the country develop diverse automotive energy solutions and commercialize such energy solutions, David S. Chen, vice president of GM China Group, said last week.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Oct 31st, 2008 11:12 am
  PM Quote Reply
265th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://devicedaily.com/misc/mit-researcher-mimics-photosynthesis-to-turn-water-into-hydrogen-and-oxygen.html

A MIT researcher has demonstrated a reaction which resembles the photosynthesis process that plants make each day which means that from now on solar power could be deployed at world scale. Using catalysts developed by the chemist, he showed a video where oxygen was generated from water, just like plants do it in photosynthesis.

 

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/oxygen-0731.html

In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 1st, 2008 08:02 pm
  PM Quote Reply
266th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.physorg.com/news144674984.html



 

Over a year, the turbine can generate about 2,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity, which is a significant percentage of the 6,500 to 10,000 kilowatt-hours per year that US households typically consume (estimates are from the US Energy Information Administration). While the installation cost run at around $10,000, state rebates and tax credits could help lower the upfront cost; for example, a renewable energy tax credit gives consumers $1,000 back for residential systems and $4,000 for commercial buildings. Depending on these incentives and performance levels, Cascade estimates that the upfront cost could be made up in as little as three years.

 

Power-Independence in as little as 3 years. How many years will the turbine last?

 

http://www.swiftwindturbine.com/?intro=skip

 

Specifications
Size
Blade/Ring Diameter: 7 feet
Minimum clearance from roofline: 2 feet


Features
Rated power output: 1.5kW @ 14 m/s
Annual Power Supplied: up to 2000 kWh
Electric power: 240VAC, 60Hz output voltage
Noise: less than 35 decibels for all wind speeds
Design enables use of turbine in urban and suburban settings
Quiet mast mounting technology eliminates unwanted vibration to building/home


Application
Swift Wind Turbine is grid connected, utilizing the electricity generated by the turbine first and supplementing anything required in addition by the electricity supplier.


Safety
The Swift Wind Turbine incorporates safety features which meet IEEE safety standards.


Environment
The Swift Wind Turbine has been designed to be environmentally sustainable. The product produces more energy in its lifetime than is incorporated in the material and processes used to manufacture it - it is therefore "harm neutral."


 

What is the warranty?
Swift has a 5 year manufacturers warranty and is designed for a 20 year life.


 

So...

Initial cost is 10,000

3 Years to pay one off.

20 divided by 3 is 6.6 or at least 6

Therefore the 10,000 dollar unit can produce 60,000 dollars worth of electricity.

Look at Joe's Law now.

Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

What then happens if the investor returns the power back into creating more power?

The investor buys one unit at 10,000 dollars and saves each dollar of electric production.

3 years later the investor had 10,000 dollars of saved electricity (the investor pays the electric bill into a savings account instead of sending that money to the electric company).

The investor then buys a second wind generator and now the investor saves 20,000 dollars in 3 more years (the output of 2 wind generators).

Now the investor buys two more wind generators after 3 more years (total of 6 years from the initial wind generator purchase).

At the begining of the 6th year the investor is now producing with 4 wind generators (the first one generated the price of the second one and then two running generators generated the price of two more generators).

After 9 years the investor banks (saves) 40,000 dollars (and can now afford to supply the entire home electric consumption and supply power for more electric appliances such as a hydrogen generator and a hydrogen fuel cell).

See here:

Over a year, the turbine can generate about 2,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity, which is a significant percentage of the 6,500 to 10,000 kilowatt-hours per year that US households typically consume (estimates are from the US Energy Information Administration).

See here:

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/oxygen-0731.html



Four wind generators at 2,000 each is 8,000 kilowatt-hours.

Now the investor buys 4 more generators for a total of 8 wind generators and the total time from the first purchase is 9 years when 8 wind generators begin producing 16,000 kilowatt-hours.

The first wind generator will last 11 more years while 7 newer wind generators increase the power produced. At the end of 3 more years the producer can bank 80,000 dollars (the total savings from 3 years of electricity produced by 8 wind generators).

Here is where realtiy steps in concerning how much electricty can be used, stored, saved, consumed, employed, or sold. The average home, according to the link just linked, consumes up to 10,000 kilowatt/hours per year and one wind generator, average, produces 2,000 kilowatt/hours per year or one fifth of the average home consuption. Since it is estimated that it will take 3 years to pay off one wind generator it is then assumed that the 3 year consumption of the average home is 5 times that 10,000 dollar price tag. 

If the home only consumes 50,000 dollars in 3 years (3 years worth of the average cost of electricity), then 8 wind generators producing: 6,000  kilowatt/hours is assumed to be more electricity produced than the average electric consumption of the average home.

60,000 can get this:



http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=10&article_id=7201

The Model S will have a base price of about $60,000 (versus the Roadster's $109,000 price tag) when it goes on sale in late 2010. Tesla recently hired Franz von Holzhausen as its chief designer; he was formerly the director of design for Mazda North America. His first project is to put the finishing touches on the Model S.

Now the investor can bank the output of those 8 generators and the investor can bank the savings in gasoline costs (no gasoline costs because the invstor now has an electric car to drive).

15 years go by since the begining of the investment of one wind generator and the investor banks another 60,000 dollars or more as the investor saves the money he or she would have spent on electricity and gasoline in the next three years.

8 electric generators were purchased from the one electric generator purchase. The output of 3 years of 8 electric generators purchases the one electric car.

Time goes by like this:

Year 1: One generator producing 20,000 kilowatt/hours and 3,333 dollars per year

Year 2: 6,666 dollars in the bank from saving the money that would have been sent to the electric company

Year 3: 10,000 dollars of savings is spent on the second wind generator

Year 4: total savings in money is now up to 6,666 after one year with 2 generators producing 3,333 dollars worth of electricity per year.

Year 4.5: Total savings after one and a half years is enough to buy one more electric generator but the investor holds off the purchase until two more generators can be purchased.

Year 6: Total savings after 3 years of two wind generators is now 20,000 dollars worth of money that would have went to the electric complany but was sent to a bank account instead. Now the investor buys 2 more wind generators.

Year 9: Four wind generators have produced 8,000 kilowatt/hours of electricity for 3 years (almost the entire home electric bill for the high end average of 10,000 kilowatt/hours per year home) and since one generator produces 10,000 dollars worth of electricity in 3 years, then, 4 times 10,000 dollars is 40,000 dollars in the bank (instead of in the electric companies bank) is spendable at this time after 9 years of investing in power investments. The investor now spends 40,000 dollars on 4 more wind generators.

Year 12: If the investor also found and spent other moneys on appliances that eliminate natural gas appliances and if the investor used all 80,000 dollars of electric production from the 8 wing generators for 3 more years from the 9 to the 12 year time span, then the investor has 80,000 dollars to spend on that electric car. The investor may also have reduces the electric bill by storing over production (when the wind is blowing fast) into hydrogen (see the MIT "discovery" link) and during times when the wind isn't blowing the hydrogen is used to generate electricty with a hydrogen fuel cell (another investment purchase that isn't accounted for in this scenario precisely).

Year 15: Three more years go by and the investor banks 80,000 dollars worth of new electric production (consuming the electricity and paying the money that would have gone to the electric company into a savings account every month) and three years go by as the investor banks the money that would have gone to the local gas stations as the investor drives by these gas stations for 3 years in his electric car that the investor fuels up at home. If the average cost of gasoline is 100 dollars per month, then this investor saves 100 times 12 times 3 to add to the 80,000 dollars worth of electric BANKING.

12 times 3 times 100 is 3600. If the investor traveled 100 dollars per week instead of 100 dollar per month worth of gasoline, then the investor banks 14,400 dollars in gasoline savings after 3 years.

That is the situation on the first day afte 12 years of re-investing the power from one of these wind generators.

80,000 dollars worth of electricity produced by 8 wind generators in the bank and from 3,600 to 14,400 savings in the bank from electric car miles traveled to save and bank the expense of gasoline.

Home power generation converted to dollars and saved in a bank on day one of the 13th year. 80,000 more dollars, plus the gasoline savings for the next 3 years, and 3 years after that, until year 20 when the first wind generator needs to be replaced.

Think about it.

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Nov 3rd, 2008 11:50 am
  PM Quote Reply
267th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.livescience.com/technology/081103-solar-cells.html

The research, conducted by Peng Wang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and colleagues, including Michael Gräztel of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, inventor of this type of cell in 1991, involves photovoltaic cells composed of titanium dioxide and powerful light-harvesting dyes.

The team used a new type of ruthenium-based dye to help boost the solar cells' light-harvesting ability. The new cells showed efficiencies as high as 10 percent, a record for this type of solar cell (efficiency is the ratio of useful energy delivered by a system to the energy initially supplied). Most silicon-based solar cells have efficiencies of around 12 percent. But manufacturing silicon is not cheap. The current cost of electricity from silicon-based solar panels for houses or businesses is 25 cents to 40 cents per kilowatt-hour, roughly triple what most people pay their utility company.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Nov 4th, 2008 11:59 am
  PM Quote Reply
268th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE4A26XF20081103?rpc=64

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A new type of reflective coating can make solar panels far more efficient, soaking up nearly all available sunlight from nearly any angle, U.S. researchers said on Monday.

 

Current solar panels -- which convert energy from the sun into electricity -- absorb only about two-thirds of available sunlight.

 

But surfaces treated with a coating developed at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York, can harvest 96.2 percent of sunlight.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 01:21 pm
  PM Quote Reply
269th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://fora.tv/2008/10/01/Eric_Schmidt_Where_Would_Google_Drill

A failure of political leadership (talk about an oxymoron)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 8th, 2008 11:24 pm
  PM Quote Reply
270th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/07/laser-sensor-boosts-wind-turbine-efficiency/

Virginia-based Catch the Wind has an innovative solution for improving wind turbine efficiency— laser beams. The company’s fiber-optic laser system gives turbines up to 20 extra seconds to adjust to changes in gusts and wind direction. That may not sound like much, but Catch the Wind claims that its system can improve turbine output by 10 percent.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Nov 14th, 2008 04:20 am
  PM Quote Reply
271st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.livescience.com/environment/081112-pf-energy-islands.html

quote:

The concept is the brainchild of inventor Dominic Michaelis. He was originally unsatisfied with the slow progress in developing ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC), a process in which cold water is pumped up from the deep ocean to generate electricity.

"Nothing new was happening with OTEC, so I thought why not bring other marine energy technologies on board?" Michaelis said.

The Energy Island that he and his son have designed would have an OTEC plant at its center, but spread across the 2,000-foot-wide (600-meter-wide) platform would also be wind turbines and solar collectors. Additionally, wave energy converters and sea current turbines would capture energy from water moving around the structure.

One of these hexagonally-shaped islands could generate 250 megawatts (enough power for a small city), Michaelis said. Even more power is possible by mooring together several Energy Islands into a small archipelago that could include greenhouses for food, a small harbor for ships and a hotel for tourists.

To attract possible investors, the Energy Island team will present their concept this week at the U.S. China GreenTech Summit in Shanghai.

 


Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Nov 14th, 2008 04:20 am
  PM Quote Reply
272nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.livescience.com/environment/081112-pf-energy-islands.html

quote:

The concept is the brainchild of inventor Dominic Michaelis. He was originally unsatisfied with the slow progress in developing ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC), a process in which cold water is pumped up from the deep ocean to generate electricity.

"Nothing new was happening with OTEC, so I thought why not bring other marine energy technologies on board?" Michaelis said.

The Energy Island that he and his son have designed would have an OTEC plant at its center, but spread across the 2,000-foot-wide (600-meter-wide) platform would also be wind turbines and solar collectors. Additionally, wave energy converters and sea current turbines would capture energy from water moving around the structure.

One of these hexagonally-shaped islands could generate 250 megawatts (enough power for a small city), Michaelis said. Even more power is possible by mooring together several Energy Islands into a small archipelago that could include greenhouses for food, a small harbor for ships and a hotel for tourists.

To attract possible investors, the Energy Island team will present their concept this week at the U.S. China GreenTech Summit in Shanghai.

 


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Nov 14th, 2008 04:28 am
  PM Quote Reply
273rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.fastcompany.com/news/2008/11/11-fuel-cell-sticker-hyperion-nuclear%20energy.html

The first device is a compact nuclear power plant about the size of a minivan that could power up to 20,000 homes, and run uninterrupted for 10 years without needing to be refueled. The energy modules were originally the brain-child of scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory, but have since been commercialized and developed by a company called Hyperion Power Generation. Hyperion announced this week that it is now taking orders for the mini-reactors, and will commence mass production within five years.

Hyperion claims that the diminutive power plants, which can be buried underground - out of sight, out of mind, as the saying goes - will generate electricity for about $0.10 a watt, anywhere in the world. That's greater than the average cost of residential electricity in the United States, but for areas with high-density energy needs and little space for electrical infrastructure, the Hyperion devices could be a good deal at $25 million each. Distributed over 10,000 homes, for example, the cost is only $2500 for an entire decade of electricity.

The plants are easily transported because of their small size, and can be plopped down in remote areas that don't currently have electricity available. They have no moving parts, and never require service or maintenance. The company says the device is incapable of “going supercritical,” or in lay-speak, melting down and killing everyone; if the enclosure is breached or a malfunction occurs, the fuel cools instead of suffering a run-away reaction. It's also not a terror risk, says the company; to enrich the fuel to weapons-grade, you'd need “nation-state resources.” After its ten years of fuel are spent, it produces a wad of waste about the size of a melon, which could theoretically be recycled into new fuel, or lobbed at your neighbor's place with a water-balloon launcher.

Hyperion says it already has 100 orders for its devices, mostly from oil and electrical utilities companies. The company plans to build 4,000 mini nuclear modules between 2013 and 2023, which may sound like wide distribution - unless compared to the potential market a new energy technology called Fuel Cell Sticker, made by a company called MyFC. Their fuel cells can fit inside cell phones, of which there are some 3.3 billion in the world, as of 2007.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 15th, 2008 07:35 pm
  PM Quote Reply
274th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 

 

 

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2289/



Ocean Power Technologies and the Navy have joined together to create a small wave farm off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii. The company has installed one of its PowerBuoy units one mile off the Kaneohe Bay Marine Corp Base, with plans to install others in the near future to generate 1MW.

 

 

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 15th, 2008 07:38 pm
  PM Quote Reply
275th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/11/12/solar.coating/index.html

 

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Researchers have developed a new anti-reflective coating that boosts the efficiency of solar panels and allows sunlight to be absorbed from almost any angle.

 

Leggett believes that the future is already very bright for the solar industry. He says that $150 billion was invested in renewable energy last year, with $28 billion of that going to photovoltaics.

"With the current efficiencies, we are one of the fastest growing markets in the world. Solar is the fastest growing clean technology with existing technology. Any other increases in efficiency are going to be the icing on a very nice cake."

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Nov 19th, 2008 10:45 am
  PM Quote Reply
276th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/18/new-cost-effective-battery-tested-to-store-wind-power/

+++++++++++

Xcel Energy
’s “Wind-to-Battery” project is currently being tested on a Minnesota wind farm. The company believes that the 80-ton battery will power 500 homes for 7 hours when fully charged. The battery’s 20 50-kilowatt modules together are roughly the size of two semi- trailers and can store 7.2 megawatt-hours of electricity.

++++++++++++

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Nov 20th, 2008 11:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
277th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/21536/page1/

Sun + Water = Fuel
With catalysts created by an MIT chemist, sunlight can turn water into hydrogen. If the process can scale up, it could make solar power a dominant source of energy.

 

For your information: 

http://www.savefuel.ca/hydrogen/

http://hytechapps.com/

http://www.magnegas.com/

http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html

 

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 22nd, 2008 12:02 pm
  PM Quote Reply
278th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/11/360-wind-powered-wal-mart-stores.php

 

Say what you like about Wal-Mart (and I certainly have said some less than flattering things), but sometimes the world’s largest retailer does something undeniably positive: Like make its first major purchase of wind power in the United States.

Announced yesterday, Wal-Mart Stores will be supplying 15% of the electricity in approximately 360 Texas stores and other facilities though wind power, purchased from Duke Energy. Wal-Mart says that the purchase will be the equivalent power of some 18,000 ordinary homes. Here are the rest of the details:

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Nov 26th, 2008 10:24 am
  PM Quote Reply
279th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/11/25/california-unveils-electric-vehicle-infrastructure-plan/

Recently the cities of San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland unveiled a massive concerted effort to become the electric vehicle capitol of the United States! This groundbreaking development heralds a nine-step plan that includes everything from buying fully electric vehicles for all government transportation to expediting the approval of charging outlets throughout the bay area, including those located on the street. The creation of this essential infrastructure marks a huge step towards the acceptance of electric vehicles as a viable alternative to those that run on fossil fuel.

 



2 cents per mile is the advertised cost of runnng an electric car. That is equivalent to a car at 50 miles per gallon when gasoline is priced at what?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Nov 26th, 2008 08:35 pm
  PM Quote Reply
280th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://gas2.org/2008/11/21/mitsubishi-partnering-with-california-and-oregon-to-bring-electric-cars-to-market/
Mitsubishi Partnering with California and Oregon to Bring Electric Cars to Market

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 04:46 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Power Independence > Good News > Good News > More Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems