| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| The Last Executive Order? | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri Feb 10th, 2017 06:52 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
I wrote a new Article for LinkedIn this morning. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/presidential-directive-served-january-30-last-order-david-merrill?trk=pulse_spock-articles Here is the missing Executive Order - deleted from the Federal Register. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-02-08/pdf/2017-02762.pdf
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Feb 11th, 2017 10:18 am |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
David, I am curious about my participation in your topics, so I am asking so as to satisfy my curiosity: do you prefer that I do not participate in these forum topics that you publish on this public access web site?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 21st, 2017 11:42 am |
|
3rd Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
If you do not participate then it will only be monologue. There is nobody else reading here as best I can tell. I have been utilizing Gold is Money for some web developments. It was shaky with some revulsion toward math but the images are so easy to post up. With images stored within the website then a reader can refresh by going through the images getting to new material, that builds on the older material. http://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/lex-mercatoria-law-merchant.135226/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 21st, 2017 11:55 am |
|
4th Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
Here is the link to watch for any new EO's - https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-orders/donald-trump/2017
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 21st, 2017 12:38 pm |
|
5th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
If I am to participate, which is my desire, I need to know if it is agreeable for me to offer my uncensored viewpoint, so that is my response, a question: Can I respond to this information with my uncensored viewpoint, and if so, then my response is to question the authority by which this group assumes authority, since my uncensored viewpoint is such that the authority in question is gained by fraud, and as such it is criminal authority, or just crime, albeit crime under the color of law.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Feb 23rd, 2017 11:13 am |
|
6th Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
The criminal syndicalism has no authority. They protect each other granting "judicial" and "sovereign" immunity. Attachment: Oath BRYAN R4C.jpg (Downloaded 11 times)
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Feb 23rd, 2017 01:13 pm |
|
7th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
What then is true authority, please. Also: they cannot give themselves "judicial" and "sovereign" immunity, no more than an any other criminal can give themselves permission to harm an innocent victim against the will of the victim: a contradiction in fact.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Feb 23rd, 2017 02:58 pm |
|
8th Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
I sued one once. The district judge who got the case granted the defendant "judge" sovereign and judicial immunity. If there is nobody to complain to, there is a breach of trust by the wayward "judiciary". If one understands trust law, then they can become the trustee of the resulting trust. That is true authority. I warned TRUMP that he best tend to the en banc "bench" of the commercial priestcraft and he tried. See EO #13772, if you can find it. https://lowerkennydale.nextdoor.com/news_feed/?post=37126342 https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-order/13772 The authority de jure is found by publication. If an Executive Order is not to be found in the publication service, the Federal Register then it has no force in law. But look... https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-02-08/pdf/2017-02762.pdf A retired law librarian found that link for me. But that means only attorneys can view EO #13772 - Private Law. I think we have a second warning from the other night. That first link, the Fed Reg Index that skips #13772 was hacked. A moment later maliciously - as it tried to infect my computer. TRUMP had best not ignore the trustee. Attachment: Federal Register in a shambles hacked.jpg (Downloaded 10 times)
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Feb 23rd, 2017 06:26 pm |
|
9th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I am not able to understand your answer to my question. I can ask again, what is the true authority. It might help, in any case, to be specific as to what is, or is not, authority in that specific case. I can assume that you think that you offered to me an answer to my question, and then I can assume that I can find what might be your answer in the words that you offer. Example: That is true authority. Previous to that is this: If there is nobody to complain to, there is a breach of trust by the wayward "judiciary". If one understands trust law, then they can become the trustee of the resulting trust. That appears to suggest that you know something about the authority that is the authority when the subject matter (the case) involved something you call trust law. That means, as far as your answer is concerned, as far as I can understand, that you are the authority in this case. So...what authority gave you authority in this case? Then you offer this: The authority de jure is found by publication. If an Executive Order is not to be found in the publication service, the Federal Register then it has no force in law. But look... Apparently the answer is once again that you are the authority in this case, as your words appear to suggest that all you have to do is say something, and that act by you creates authority. Again, I am forced to assume, since the information offered is lacking specific answers to a specific question. What is the true authority? What is the true authority in any case, including any case you can offer, such as the cases you do offer, whereby the case is a specific case, concerning specific subject matter, and if all you do is claim authority, then what am I supposed to do, other than assume, that you claim that you are the authority in that case? A case that can serve as an example: TRUMP had best not ignore the trustee. As far as I know TRUMP is the individual who presides over an organized crime cabal that began in 1789. The claim of authority in that case is a false claim, the false claim of authority is documented within the official record of those who publicized their criminal take-over of the federation that operated under the Articles of Confederation. Who, or what, is the "trustee" in the example offered in the previous quote, and is that "trustee" another criminal authority that is dealing with the criminal authority presided over by TRUMP, or is it the same criminal authority?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Feb 24th, 2017 09:09 pm |
|
10th Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
The truth will set knowledge free.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Feb 25th, 2017 10:45 am |
|
11th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k41fNiN5igYBut today, it is said, there is freedom of speech: one may state without fear of death what one believes concerning the mysteries of life. What anyone thinks or knows about the constitution and functioning of the human body and of the conscious self that inhabits it, the truth or opinions that one may have concerning the relation between the embodied self and its real Self, and regarding the way to knowledge - these need not be hidden, today, in words of mystery requiring a key or a code for their understanding. In modern times all "hints" and "blinds," and "secrets" and "initiations," in a special mystery language, should be evidence of ignorance, egotism, or sordid commercialism. What, according to you, is the source of authority in any case, including the case you specify in the previous posts? I'd like to know, and I cannot rely upon an assumed ability to decipher coded messages.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Feb 25th, 2017 10:36 pm |
|
12th Post |
|
David Merrill Guest
|
Of course. I got an early start. The universe is driven by mind. I was in the middle of a centripetal force homework problem when it struck me that the mind is powerful enough (e=mc*2) to bend a beam of light into such a tiny circle as to comprise an electron shell. That is just for one atom of hydrogen too. Now build on that and create an infinite universe, upon that Mind and you have infinite mind too. To author something means you have authority over it. If you create, you have authority over your creation. Attachment: Time Dilation excursion 001.jpg (Downloaded 5 times)
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 27th, 2017 09:14 am |
|
13th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I can try again. Example: If one understands trust law, then they can become the trustee of the resulting trust. TRUMP had best not ignore the trustee. In the words above are meanings specific to cases involving people alive today, people who are subject to actions done according to a specific authority known as the United States of America. My question concerning authority (the source of it) concerns that specific authority, and the latest answer I find is this:
I did not author the United States of America, and as far as I know the United States of America did not author me. If all I get (as an answer) is this claim of authority, then this claim of authority does not apply to this case where the United States of America is the claim of authority claimed by those who act (according to that specific claim of authority) upon many people, including me, with acts that include the Judiciary Act of 1789, and many other acts affecting people on earth here, now, and on into the future. Example 2: Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. Se Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing. What (specifically) is the authority in that specific case (under the Laws of the United States) according to you, please? If your answer is this following, then your answer is code as far as I know, because the one does not apply to the other, as far as I can see.
To me, there is an obvious answer, and it is simple, not complicated. The authority in the case of a voluntary federation of free people in liberty (the original United States of America before the criminals counterfeited it) is under the law of agreement, or whatever is agreed upon by those who agree to voluntarily defend each other from harm done to them by criminals; criminals who may or may not claim false authority: under the color of law.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 01:20 pm | |
| Power Independence > Good News > Good News > The Last Executive Order? | Top |
