 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Example:
If one understands trust law, then they can become the trustee of the resulting trust.
TRUMP had best not ignore the trustee.
In the words above are meanings specific to cases involving people alive today, people who are subject to actions done according to a specific authority known as the United States of America.
My question concerning authority (the source of it) concerns that specific authority, and the latest answer I find is this:
To author something means you have authority over it. If you create, you have authority over your creation.
I did not author the United States of America, and as far as I know the United States of America did not author me. If all I get (as an answer) is this claim of authority, then this claim of authority does not apply to this case where the United States of America is the claim of authority claimed by those who act (according to that specific claim of authority) upon many people, including me, with acts that include the Judiciary Act of 1789, and many other acts affecting people on earth here, now, and on into the future.
Example 2:
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. Se Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing.
What (specifically) is the authority in that specific case (under the Laws of the United States) according to you, please?
If your answer is this following, then your answer is code as far as I know, because the one does not apply to the other, as far as I can see.
To author something means you have authority over it. If you create, you have authority over your creation.
To me, there is an obvious answer, and it is simple, not complicated.
The authority in the case of a voluntary federation of free people in liberty (the original United States of America before the criminals counterfeited it) is under the law of agreement, or whatever is agreed upon by those who agree to voluntarily defend each other from harm done to them by criminals; criminals who may or may not claim false authority: under the color of law.