| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Trade | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri Aug 12th, 2011 07:25 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GF16Dj01.htmlDomestic development has been marginalized as a hapless victim of foreign trade, dependent on trade surplus for capital. What do these words intend to mean? http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/trade-surplus.asp#axzz1UqeKeHFH What Does Trade Surplus Mean? Please consider the possibility that language is being distorted in this usage for a reason. I have so far been remiss in dissecting the first link on the top of the page, so as to better understand another viewpoint on the subject of China. My viewpoint is simple. China is on the schedule to be the next super power and that schedule follows a predictable path based upon history. Each new world leader BASE of operations changes from one Nation to another Nation roughly every 100 years. I can go get the data I've been given on a study of that curious historical "Business Cycle", and offer a short list of the regimes changes recorded on that list. The study I have was mailed to me out of the blue, by someone who had read some of my work, and it, to me, was like playing three way chess and being handed a queen to use in my next move. 2182 - 2078 BC Babalonia 840 -944 The Franks 1588- 1672 Holland 1672 - 1776 France 1776 - 1880 England 1880 - 1984 U.S.A The study predicted Japan to be next in line, but the study was done decades ago and it is obvious that China is the next world leader on the schedule. This is obvious for two reasons: 1. Very little attention is focused on China in main stream news, as the silence appears to be the calm before the storm. All it takes is one incident to spark a media blitz of hatred directed at the Chinese, just as easy as it is to create hatred for Islamic (Finance) enemies of The Dollar Hegemony. 2. Of the news that is reported (outside the main stream black-out) the news reports "capital flight"; as the power to purchase is being spent in China. You can guess why I found Asia Times, as a news source, and in particular you can guess why I am now focused on the Trade War study, or report, done by Henry C K Liu. This is the stuff that is being done by someone in your ranks, you The Honest Productive Americans, as some of us volunteer to employ our time in the effort to know better, as to what is going to happen to our world, as the Legal Criminals use our power to rock our world. We are on the schedule for BUST, while China is on the schedule for BOOM, and when The World Reserve Currency Status is no longer BASED in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and when that power moves to the new location, the things reported by Henry C K Liu, in Trade Wars, will apply to The Honest Productive Americans in reverse, since World Reserve Currency Status (Power), amounts to a form of legal/financial leverage. What is meant by the term "leverage"? Questions, questions, questions. Now that you have a basic overview of what to expect, as power shifts from America to China, and be warned that the shift may include a World War, to ensure complete transfer of power, without any loose ends tied up, all will be destroyed except for the powers that are designed to remain powerful, and this isn't news, this isn't conjecture, this isn't theory, this is basic accurate measures of reality, read your Machiavelli well. Know what is at stake, which is more than another few hours of work before work ends on Friday and the weekend begins, including a part time job on Saturday night - perhaps. Big things are happening, on schedule, it is time for "change", as in regime change. Back to the nagging question concerning Trade Surplus, and the distortion of language, which is one of those untied loose ends, whereby the Legal Criminals are rendered powerless when those loose ends are tied back up. Legal Criminals cannot allow their victims to gain the power of accurate currency, in any form, accurate language, accurate money, accurate economic activity, accurate defensive military, none of that is tolerable in the hands of the ready victims, and this should be as easy to know as knowing not to look at the sun. Did your parents really have to tell you not to look at the sun? This: What Does Trade Surplus Mean? Visually: America <-<-<-<-<-<-<-<- China Know what is going on. These words: An economic measure of a positive balance of trade, where a country's exports exceeds its imports. China has a trade surplus, which should read "surplus", with the exaggerated hand gesture like Nixon's peace signs. Here:  China has a trade surplus, so what does that mean? Stuff flows from China to America. Why does that sound backwards? Legal Crime is an up-side-down world. America <-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-China Stuff flows from China to America as a Trade Surplus is caused into being, by some force, and there are three obvious forces involved: 1. Voluntary Competition as competitors resort to choosing to make higher quality products at lower costs so as to gain market share in a Free Market, where the word free means to be free from crime. 2. Crime 2a. People resorting to deceit as a means of "making a living". 2b. People resorting to threats of violence to gain power over targeted victims. 2c. People resorting to acts of aggressive violence as a means of profiting, or just for the hell of it, at the expense of the innocent victims 3. Random occurrences, or luck. Stuff flows from China to America and that causes a Trade Surplus in China, and knowing that tends to confuse a person, if that is all that is known, so there is more to know, there are pertinent questions that need to be answered. Returning to the definition of Trade Surplus: What Does Trade Surplus Mean? There is the "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" moment. You don't see it? Here: A trade surplus represents a net inflow of domestic currency from foreign markets What kind of game is being played with language? What is meant by "domestic" in "domestic currency"? Returning back to the visual of stuff flowing: America <-<-<-<-<-<-<-China That is a visual representation of this: An economic measure of a positive balance of trade, where a country's exports exceeds its imports. That is confusing, and it may be confusing on purpose, or it may be a language that is spoken by a specialists, a language that is unique to a specialized network of people, and I have to ask, and you can help answer: do any of those specialized people know what they are talking about, or are they merely parroting the words they have been instructed to repeat? How about real examples of stuff being transferred in real time. Go to WallMart, or BestBuy, or any store, and see what is for sale, and find out where that stuff was made, and before you can answer that question accurately I'll offer a quote from the article at the top of the page: The boots and uniforms worn by US soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq were made in China. Some stuff, metal, raw materials, wheat, and dollars, made in America, flow to China, but the net measure of stuff is measured by some net measuring device, and that net measuring device is shared, or common to all, common to all in the network of specialized people who measure the same net measurement with the same measuring device, and that measuring device can be called The World Reserve Currency. The Dollar Hegemony makes The World Reserve Currency, and it is The Dollar, and it measures stuff, and it is shared by everyone who shares that measuring device, it is an inclusive club, all who are in the club are all who are in the club, for now. America <-<-<-<-<-<-<-China The net measure of stuff flowing in that direction, according to the definition of Trade Surplus, is more stuff being exported from China, which causes a Trade Surplus. A trade surplus represents a net inflow of domestic currency from foreign markets What does that mean, exactly? Is there a need for more information, so as to answer the question accurately? How about quoting more words from the Investopedia link, on the subject of Trade Surplus, as Investopedia offers a definition of the term Trade Surplus? When a nation has a trade surplus, it has control over the majority of its own currency. This causes a reduction of risk for another nation selling this currency, which causes a drop in its value. When the currency loses value, it makes it more expensive to purchase imports, causing an even a greater imbalance. That is quoted by way of cut and paste, so I can't be held accountable for the errors, if there are any. What is meant by "domestic currency"? Currency made in China is domestic Chinese currency. So the visual can be added as such: Stuff like boots for troops flowing: Shipped to America <-<-<-<-<-<-Made in China Domestic Currency Shipped from America ->->->->->Made in China How does America get currency made in China, in the first place? Before someone claims that I am confused, and before someone gives up on this effort to know what is being reported, please understand that I am not confused, I am focused, I am clear headed, and I know what is going on, and I can prove it, and the confusion in question, here, is the language employed by the writer of the article being inspected. I refuse to take anything for granted, therefore I am employing my power of accurate discernment in the work required to know the intended message better, by seeking help from other people, and by employing deductive reasoning. To prove to you that I do know what is going on I see a need to explain the nature of State Bank competition as one State bank competes with another State bank, whereby the results of that competition are events that are called Trade Surpluses. One State bank will produce a product called legal money. Can you claim otherwise? Another State bank will produce a competitive legal money. Again, if you think I'm confused, then contend with my offering of clear understanding. 1. The dollar 2. The yuan If there is anything, ever, existing in our world that can clue a victim in on the true nature of Legal Crime, this is it, as the potential victim reads the next whistle being blown on the Legal Criminals. In a free market the dominant legal currency will overpower the submissive currency as quality increases and cost decreases since the dominant legal currency will be chosen over the lower quality and higher cost submissive currency. All that any producer of currency has to do to corner the market is to produce a higher quality currency at a lower cost and having done that all the competition will be forced to go out of business or be forced to increase quality and lower cost too. The only explanation for low quality and high cost legal currency is collusion, or cartelization, whereby the force of competition is no longer a force, whereby the members of the cartel agree to set a limit on the quality of production, and the members of the cartel agree to set a limit on the price of production. The supposedly separate and sovereign legal entities known as States, or Nations, are no such thing. You have the proof before you, you can know this as well as I do, you don't have to be confused, it is easy to see, there is no argument possible, this is merely factual, as factual as knowing not to stare at the sun. I am not confused. The article offers a message. The message is written in code. Language is duplicitous on purpose, a form of "fine print" is at play, and it may help to untie the tangle web of deceit, if the idea is to know more, to know better, since the messages are confusing, on purpose, and there may be something in the message worth knowing. I am not confused about how The World Reserve Currency is a New World Order, or how there are a very few people networked together into one Cartel, one homogenous group, one "hegemony" of legal/financial, or physical/physiological, or economic/political POWER. Their number is recorded, as the legal paper trails of legal money originate at that source, and as those paper trails flow through their victims, and as those paper trails return to those sources. The Federal Reserve System of Extortion is one source. The people operating that member of that cartel produce a legal unit of money, no one else is allowed to produce that unit of money. Paper trails are produced by those people. Their product circulates and gathers power along the path of the flow of those units of currency, and by design all measures of power flow to those people who operate that legal fiction. That is measurable. There are measures of that, having nothing to do with me, as I am merely a messenger. Here is an example of the message (that has nothing to do with me, as I know the message clearly, and as you may be confused by the message): http://www.usdebtclock.org/ I am not confused about that, and in China there is another one of those networks, and the proof that The Dollar Hegemony is in league with the Chinese Hegemony, is the fact that The Honest Productive People in the world do not have the highest quality legal money, at the lowest cost, produced, on the shelf, ready for use, anytime, anywhere. If the Chinese produce the best stuff, let's use it, why not, why not produce something even better at home? The force of competition, if there was one in China, would allow the Chinese currency product to take over The World Reserve Currency Status, before the week was over, or the American currency would be forced into much higher quality, at a much lower cost, than The Dollar is now, so as to avoid having the currency Made in China, take over as the highest quality and lowest cost currency. The current legal currency monopoly power is The Dollar Hegemony, and it is a very low quality currency, and a very high cost currency. Why? The answer is self-evident. You may be confused. I am not. The message in the fine print, is confusing, and it is confusing by design, and knowing that confusion is cause, in my view, to figure out the full measure of that confusion; which brings me back to illustrations: Stuff like boots for troops flowing: Shipped to America <-<-<-<-<-<-Made in China Domestic Currency Shipped from America ->->->->->Made in China More physical stuff, like boots, are exchanged for Chinese money, as boots flow to America: Chinese money goes back to China, and obviously, as a result of that "imbalance" those in America who want more boots will be wanting more Chinese money, as Chinese money runs out, as people wanting more boots run out of Chinese money to exchange for boots. Why is that of any concern at all? Someone in America can pay with dollars, or use dollars to buy yuan, and in either case the transaction can occur without any additional expense, and if there is an additional expense, the expense can be negotiated, split, or borne by either side fully, during the exchange. Who cares? Only the central bankers care, and their cohorts, their employees, and their victims care. It has to be understood that both members of the cartel are trying to get away with fraud, theft, torture, and mass murder, they have to do that in order to keep their power to steal everything with their own home grown State Bank turf. One State Bank operator will grow jealous of another State Bank operator. Do you see that working? No you don't. The reason you don't is because you are still duped. You still believe in the lie that punishment is necessary for law and order, and you still believe in the lie that taxes must be involuntary, or deadbeats will get a free ride, or some other lie, therefore you can't see anything wrong with one Strong Man, enforcer of involuntary taxes, growing jealous over another Strong Man, enforcer of involuntary taxes, over their respective "Tax Payers". I have to rap this present work up, and leave the deciphering for another day. Suffice to say, at this point, that there is a mutual agreement among the Legal Criminals to limit the quality and cost of legal money and when those limits are exceeded by one member of the cartel the other members of the cartel question that deceptive, threatening, and usually violent, act of aggression. Suffice to add that one member of the cartel is allowed to lie, rob, rape, eat, and enslave their designated victims that they own exclusively, but the crime of making a high quality legal currency at a low cost is intolerable, it cannot be allowed, the penalty is exile from the club, which amounts to a degrade in rank from Legal Criminal to victim. We are given commandments, that include such things as the golden rule. We are to follow those rules, according to the law we are told to obey. There is only one rule enforced by them, even among their own number. That shalt not produce a high quality, low cost, legal money. If you invent the golden rule, it matters not that someone else claims to invent it too.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Aug 14th, 2011 02:53 pm |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, While resting in a meditative type state, not yoga, not religion, just not doing work, having my focus of attention released from specific tasks, my thinking wandered back to the Trade War questions brought up by much of the News sources that cover the Blackout topic of China (from the U.S.A. Legal Crime versus Victims perspective). I invented another angle of view and in this angle of view the concept of exchange is broken down into parts, and then reassembled into a language that intends to avoid confusion. Exchanges (Between anyone in American and anyone in China for example) are either: A. A net transfer of power in favor of one or the other participant in the exchange B. An equitable transfer where no one gains at the expense of anyone else The range of exactly how much one participant in any exchange gains at the expense of any other participant in any exchange is significant since a very small, or imperceptible, or immeasurable gain at the expense of any other participant is equity, it is the definition of equity, and only when the range of significance in gain, at the expense of, someone else, are exchanges no longer equitable. That may be confusing, to the reader, but it is not confusing to the writer. The reason for viewing exchanges based upon a range, rather than "Black or White", Good or Evil, Equitable or Inequitable, is due to the nature of being. We are not all the same, and we are all individuals, and each situation is relatively different from each other situation, and somewhere in the middle of the worst case of inequitable exchange and the best example of an equitable exchange are all the actual exchanges. Moving closer to an equitable exchange, during the next exchange to be executed by the participants in the next exchange, anywhere on Earth, causes smiles, happiness, satisfaction, mutual agreement, common benefit, and cause for trust, cause for continued relations, good feelings, and other such obvious effects, that result from more, and more, and more movement that moves closer to the equitable ideal, even though the participants all understand that equity isn't perfect, someone may come out ahead, at the expense of someone else, while the exchange progresses through; during the process. Keep in mind that a participant in an exchange may be an innocent bystander, or an externality, someone as yet to be affected by a specific exchange, aggressive wars for profit being an example of how many innocent participants are affected as the exchange follows through in time and place. Moving the opposite way causes the opposite effects, as participants resort to deceit, or resort to threats of violence, or resort to acts of violence, the exchange moves toward "making a killing", and participants learn to distrust, fear being "taken to the cleaners" occurs, as the actual exchange moves more, and more, measurably, more and more perceptibly, away from equity, moving much further toward inequity, as one end of the stick becomes stinky, rotten, and the other end of the stick turns to gold. I'm not reporting fantasy. You are being shown how equity works, and you are being told how the opposite of equity works, and you are not being handed a pack of lies, whereby the word equity has lost its meaning, through duplicity, and through willful misuse. Equity is the opposite of inequity. Equity is not a synonym for equality. Equity is a happy event, in time, as exchanges follow through and as all the participants, internal or external, involved in exchanges are more fully satisfied with the mutual benefits that occur during equitable exchanges. Trade Wars are the topic. Trade is another word for exchanges. There are words used to describe exchanges. You can call someone a buyer. You can call someone a seller. Why would you do that? Take that apart, and put that all back together, and remove the superfluous language, remove the parts that constitute monkey wrenches thrown into the exchange so as to gum up the works, for some strange reason, for profit, or for fun. Someone invents lies for reasons. It is past time to declare war on falsehood. Be a warrior. Discover the enemy. Attack the enemy. Defeat the enemy. China is a legal fiction. China is a word used to communicate a large number of people, a set of people, a list of people, all of the people who constitute that set of people, who are currently alive and living on Earth, and they are not included in the set of people called U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). China, the word, means a specific thing, and it means, specifically NOT U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) China is China U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is not China. China means: all the people in China. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) does not mean: all the people in China. I am focusing attention on China, because it is clear to me that China is being BOOMED for a reason, and it may be a good idea to know that reason. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is being BUSTED. Do you contend with that assessment? If you contend with that assessment, please do so in writing, and in that way you can equitably participate in this discussion, by offering something in exchange for what you read. What is the full measure of a BOOM? What is the full measure of a BUST? U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)-------trades-----------China U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-China What is the full measure of the net total of everything Made in China that is transferred from China as all that is Made in China moves to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)? I've quoted someone's measure of some of the stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and from the article on Trade Wars items on the list of all the stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are boots used by troops sent to Iraq and Afghanistan by U.S.A. Inc. (LLC); boots made in China. It can be known that if U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is conducting aggressive wars for profit, which is the supreme crime against humanity, then China is an accessory to those crimes, as China lends material support to the legal criminal aggressors who commit that supreme crime against humanity, unless, and this brings you back to the measure of equity, unless the exchange is inequitable. China can't be taking U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to the cleaners, and at the same time lending mutual support, to think so is to be duplicitous. Either China is aiding and abetting Legal Crime, or not, not both at the same time, in each case, such as the deal with the boots. If the boots were purchased at a loss, whereby the boots went from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), while U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) paid much too much for those boots, whereby China gained, at the expense of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), then that would be a case of China "taking U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to the cleaners", whereby China "made a killing", in that inequitable exchange, and in that measure China injured U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and China did what it could to weaken the legal crime aggressors who commit the supreme crime against humanity, by making U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) spend much too much for the boots their troops wear as those troops obey those legal crime orders, as that legal crime war of aggression for profit, a supreme crime against humanity, is perpetrated in Iraq, and Afghanistan. Meanwhile China grows stronger at the expense of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) - if that is the case. If a troop disobeys a criminal order, who judges that act? On the list of stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are boots for troops, what else? How much did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) pay China for those boots? Did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) have to buy Chinese dollars first, before buying boots for troops? Please note how using the words Buy and Sell causes confusion. A transfer is a transfer. Why is one participant designated as a buyer? Why is one participant in a transfer designated as a seller? I will try to avoid such confusion, as time goes by. What did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) exchange for Chinese dollars, so as to receive Chinese dollars; what was transferred to China, from U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) so as to move Chinese dollars to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)? You may think that I am wandering, on a wild goose chase, and you may not see any value on this path, and while you think that, I will offer you a measure of why this path is necessary. Look here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28831.htm $10 Trillion missing from Pentagon since 1991 You look there, since I already went there, and since you may not have gone there yet, you may not understand how, or why, that connects to the subject of China and Trade Wars. The idea of this topic, for your consideration, is China, and the coming Trade War, to know it, to understand it, and so as to help arrive at that goal, I offer a link to a person who has been down this path for some time now, and I will relink that web page, and I will quote again from that report. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GF16Dj01.html Two decades of neo-liberal globalized trade have widened income and wealth disparity within and between nations. Free trade has turned out not to be the win-win game promised by neo-liberals. It is very much a win-lose game, with heads, the rich economies win, and tails, the poor economies lose. Domestic development has been marginalized as a hapless victim of foreign trade, dependent on trade surplus for capital. Foreign trade and foreign investment have become the prerequisite engines for domestic development. This trade model condemns those economies with trade deficits to perpetual underdevelopment. Because of dollar hegemony, all foreign investment goes only to the export sector where US dollars can be earned. Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies. There are many ways in which to read, or understand, the message being sent by that person as that person uses those English words. I think it may be a good idea to read the intended message. The message appears to suggest that U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is gaining at the expense of China, and doing so in a specific way, as reported by the author of those words. If that is what is being reported: I don't agree. My guess is that the author fails to separate all the people involved into four separate groups, and failing to do that causes confusion, and misunderstanding. The Four Groups: 1. Legal Criminals based in China 2. Legal Criminals based in America 3. Honest productive people (victims) in China 4. Honest productive people (victims) in America The nature of the connection between the Legal Criminals based in China and The Honest Productive People (victims) in China is not specified by me, or anyone, so far in this current focus. That connection between the Legal Criminals and The Honest Productive People (victims) in China could be much more specific as time goes by during this current focus. The nature of the connection between the Legal Criminals based in America and The Honest Productive People (victims) in America is very specific from my viewpoint, and my guess is that a similar connection occurs in China, whereby the Legal Criminals resort to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence as they target the Honest Productive People so as to transfer all the power produced by The Honest Productive People to them, to The Legal Criminals, and they do so by gaining control over all forms of accounting, all forms of measures, all forms of currency, including language, news, money, raw materials, stocks, bonds, insurance, medicine, services, roads, land, food, water, and even air. Look at any report on the increase in pollution in China, and know how The Legal Criminals take over control of the air, if you have even a shadow of doubt concerning the validity, the measurable validity, of my viewpoint. My focus here includes a goal by which the link between The Legal Criminals in China are established as those Legal Criminals connect to The Legal Criminals in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and the reason for having that goal is such that that connection will accurately identify the Cartel, it will accurately identify those who are working toward World War III, so as to profit by that war, as the Cartel moves operations from U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to China. Look at it this way: U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)->->->->->->World Reserve Currency POWER->->->->->->->->China All the other measures of inequitable transfers make sense when viewed from that ultimate goal of that inequitable transfer. What if I am wrong? I can offer a number of ways to measure how I will be wrong. A. Purchasing Power Parity will not switch from favoring high wages paid to Honest Productive Americans to favoring high wages paid to Honest Productive Chinese People B. Purchasing Power Parity will not become equitable, whereby Honest Productive Americans are paid more while Honest Productive Chinese People are paid as much (a function of increased production traded equitably) C. World War III will reverse, aggressive wars for profit will stop, military expenses will decline, power will be invested toward producing more productive power instead of being employed to destroy. D. In place of one World Reserve Currency will be free market competition in money markets world wide, and the highest quality legal money, at the lowest cost, will gain market share, and that form of money will be higher in quality than anyone has ever imagined at this point in human time, and the cost of that best, new, form of money will be lower than anyone has yet imagined at this time on this planet. I do not want to simply skip past the troublesome use of English language contained in the quote so far offered, and I will repeat that quote again: Two decades of neo-liberal globalized trade have widened income and wealth disparity within and between nations. Free trade has turned out not to be the win-win game promised by neo-liberals. It is very much a win-lose game, with heads, the rich economies win, and tails, the poor economies lose. Domestic development has been marginalized as a hapless victim of foreign trade, dependent on trade surplus for capital. Foreign trade and foreign investment have become the prerequisite engines for domestic development. This trade model condemns those economies with trade deficits to perpetual underdevelopment. Because of dollar hegemony, all foreign investment goes only to the export sector where US dollars can be earned. Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies. What must be understood, it seems to me, is that the person writing those words, in English, is speaking code, and the code being spoken is founded upon deception, and as such there are many possible ways to interpret the words being written, and there are few things that can be accurately determined by those words. I can try removing the last sentence, and from it there may be something that can be accurately determined. Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies. It must be first understood: If a legal entity comprised of Honest Productive People (not criminals with badges) were to invent, then produce, and then maintain the highest quality legal money ever invented, produced, and maintained, even higher than all the past inventions, then the words written and quoted above would be meaningless. The Legal Criminals who employ Legal Money to exploit The Honest Productive People in America are competing against The Chinese as The Chinese do what ever they are doing in China, as the Chinese people invent, produce, and maintain a Legal Currency, or Legal Money. Which money is higher quality and lower cost? The Dollar Hegemony is CURRENTLY very, very, very, low quality, and very, very, very, high cost, and it is CURRENTLY measured up as very low quality and very high cost because, as everyone knows, the producers of that money keep secret what they are doing with that money, and that alone measures up as very low quality, and very high cost. Added to the high cost of secrecy, and the low quality of secrecy, concerning what The Dollar Hegemony does with The Dollar Supply, are indicators, reports, and accounts of extreme abuse of The Dollar Supply, as for example, a report by The Federal Reserve System Operators (criminals) whereby the total supply of dollars doubled in 2008. Doubling the money supply can be understood by analogy. Suppose you have extra money and you want your extra money saved. You don't want your extra money to drop in value. You want your extra money to be as valuable, if not more valuable, tomorrow, compared to the value of your money today. When the Legal Criminals doubled the money supply in 2008, the value of your dollar is effectively cut in half, by that one decision done by that single decision making power. You may have worked 25 years of hard labor to get your dollars saved up by 2008, and one decision made by that one decision making power cuts your savings in half, at the stroke of a pen, or at one key press on a keyboard, as the Legal Criminal in charge presses Enter, and The Legal Money Supply is doubled in 2008. Too bad for you. That is a measure of quality, and it is very poor quality Legal Money. That is a measure of cost, and it is very costly Legal Money. You must know, by now, that The Legal Criminals didn't make that decision in 2008 so as to help you out of a jam, they made that decision because they profit from that decision, and they profit from that decision, obviously, at the expense of their targeted victims. You must know that by now. If you don't, you are way behind, and you are powerless from that ignorant position. Too bad for you. Now, knowing that, you can now gauge, or judge, or discriminate, the relative quality and cost of the competitive Legal Money invented by The Chinese, produced by The Chinese, and maintained by The Chinese, compared to The Dollar Hegemony product, which, as you can see, is very, very, very, very, poor in quality, and very, very, very, very, high in cost. How low can anyone go? Do you know the meaning of the phrase "a race to the bottom"? If The Chinese Legal Money is "better" than The Dollar Hegemony product, how is it "better"? If it is "better", then why don't we copy it, and use it, instead of The Dollar Hegemony product? Don't question The Dollar Hegemony product? What do you get, then, when you fail to invent, produce, and maintain an adaptive alternative to something that is measurably very destructive? Stay the course? Are you insane? Are you brainwashed? Are you an ignorant, ready, willing, and able victim? Please sir, can I have some more: torture, pain, work, misery, murder, for nothing in return, except more work, pain, torture, terror, misery, and murder? Why always the smelly end of the stick, if you have to ask the price, can you afford it? Isn't it past time to turn that thing around? How about merely avoiding it altogether? Back to the sentence: Actually I have to edit and then move onto other activities.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 15th, 2011 02:30 pm |
|
3rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1020.html Trade Wars, On the continuing effort to understand, better, the Trade Wars concept, while utilizing the extensive work done by Henry C K Liu, I am going to reinforce the account by which two divergent perspectives view Trade Wars, and in doing so I find help from Gary North. Two competitive angles of view, one angle is false, misleading, and prone to compound error, the other makes sense. Governments always announce and defend by monopolistic violence their legal sovereignty over money. I take exception to the word choices in Gary North's report above, since there are two obvious divergent, and opposing types of government, and therefore Gary North fails to make that point clear; however, the point made clear by Gary North helps support the accurate identification of one of the two divergent perspectives from which to view Trade Wars. Two divergent perspectives from which to begin viewing Trade Wars: 1. One side opposes another side in a Trade War. (False Front) 2. One Cartel employes one side against another side so as to cause a Trade War in the effort to maintain power over all competition. (That which is hidden behind the False Front) If the first perspective is chosen and if then the subject of Trade Wars is viewed from that false perspective, then all the information that may indicate that that is a false perspective must be ignored or in the lie will be exposed. If the second perspective is chosen and if then the subject of Trade Wars is viewed from a perspective that there is one Cartel employing two opposing sides so as to cause a Trade War, in the effort to maintain power over all competition, then any information that may indicate that there is a Cartel employing two opposing sides so as to cause a Trade War will be information that confirms, or supports, that initial appraisal, and that information can then be used, rather than discarded, to build the whole, full measure, of the perpetuating Trade War phenomenon. It can be easily known, and accurately known, that one side of the Trade War, the U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) side, is run by a Cartel of a few of the most powerful people and those few people are known as The Dollar Hegemony. The World Reserve Currency Power is The Dollar Hegemony, and within that power there are a few people, who have names, who are alive, and who live at addresses, and who have the legal power to double the number of legal dollars at will, and they can cut that number in half, at will, and therefore they have the legal power to perpetuate a man-made business cycle on their exclusive, secret, insider, schedule, and that is the full measure of a Cartel. The Cartel runs U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) through exclusive control over the legal dollar unit of money, and that Cartel is The Dollar Hegemony, and The Dollar Hegemony is not the same thing as U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), one is a "government" and the other is not the same thing as a "government" when using the term "government" in the common, ambiguous, definition. Answering the question "What is The Dollar Hegemony?" will not result in finding the same answer as answering the question "What is the government of those United States of America?", yet, the accurate definition of government is such that The Dollar Hegemony does, in fact, govern, or order, or make decisions for, or cause action from, those people who run around in positions of authority within the offices of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), not the other way around. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve does not take orders from The President, the opposite is true, in real terms. The Dollar Hegemony is a Cartel, a very few people who maintain monopoly control over the legal dollar unit of money, and all that goes with that power. The government of those United States of America is The People, a mutual agreement, and an ambiguous form of government written in a form called The U.S. Constitution - also known as a legal fiction; whose chief official is The President of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and as such, as a legal fiction, that network, that inclusive group, has no money, it is broke, it requires finance, it requires power, it requires power to purchase, and where does that legal fiction get the power to purchase? U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), depends upon, us subject to, The Federal Reserve System of Extortion for the power required to purchase whatever is required to run U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). That is the order of that regime. That regime changed from what it was to what it is now in 1913. The Federal Reserve System of Extortion was created in 1913, along with The Federal Income Extortion Tax which connected The Federal Reserve System of Extortion directly to the source of power, bypassing the Separate and no longer Sovereign State Government legal fictions within the working Nation State despotic form of government, or involuntary association. If someone questions the validity of the government of those United States of America, the answer can be: "Love it or leave it." and so far those who mutually agree to stay, can stay, and those who mutually agree to leave, can leave, and those who have been declared to be criminals are no longer able to love it or leave it, and they then may being tortured, and they then may also be murdered, which is one way of knowing just how ambiguous the legal fiction has become, over the years of interpreting the ambiguity that was designed into The Constitution. The definition of that which is a criminal, and that which is not criminal is a power reserved to those who have the power to interpret The Constitution in whichever way they please, at any moment, and the opposite interpretation can be chosen the next second, at will, and that is how Legal Criminals roll, so get used to it, or leave it, while you still can, before you too are a designated criminal, fed into the meat grinder, when it is your turn. The People are operating within a system of lies, that go by the false name of government, and as such The People are victims of their own folly, so to speak, but that has little to do with the money power. People who question the dollar include me, and very few others, and questioning the dollar as a separate power, separated from the legal fiction known as The U.S. Constitution, is even less often a challenge offered by any of The People within that network of people who may ask if they love it or if they are going to leave it, where "it" is the place within the legal reach of the enforces of The U.S. Constitution, those same people who give themselves the power to interpret The Constitution to fit their agenda, at any given moment. Their agenda, coincidentally or not, is the same agenda as The Dollar Hegemony, which is to steal all the power that can be stolen from the source of power. Get it straight, if you are going to get anything straight in a crooked world, that The Dollar Hegemony is more powerful than U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and both are powers that subject The People to anything so long as The People allow such lies to become belief in their own minds; since The People are the source of power, they can allow their power to be stolen, or they can choose to no longer allow their power to be stolen; as easy as apple pie. People who tend to falsely combine The Dollar Hegemony power with the U.S. government power, under The U.S. Constitution, as if they were one power, are many people, duped, or liars, and very few recognize that they are two separate powers, and as such, one is more powerful than the other, as one dominates, or has dominion over the other, where the less powerful one is subject to the other's control. The Dollar Hegemony people overpower the people running U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and that fact is easily proven, and those who fail to recognize that fact are those who will fail to understand the U.S. side in this ongoing Trade War. As to what is going on in China, the viewpoint from here in California is admittedly prone to error as the limits of accurate information include an inability to understand the foreign language, among other serious limitations; hence the choice to read the report by Henry C K Liu from the Asia Times web site. The Trade War is being run on the American side by the very few people who run The Dollar Hegemony, not the very few people who run U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and knowing that fact is a good start in knowing the ongoing Trade War better, rather than assuming that control over the American side of the Trade War is in the hands of the officers of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), where Barry Soetoro, aka Obama, is presently held accountable as the leader of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Who is in charge? 1. Ben Bernanke aka Chairman of the Federal Reserve System of Extortion 2. Barry Soetoro aka Obama 3. The person or persons who hire both 1 and 2 as false fronts to cover up the actual people running The Dollar Hegemony Cartel. Why did Ben Bernanke double the supply of legal dollars in 2008, and what did all that power purchase? If you can't answer the question you are definitely not in charge; leading those powers that can make those decisions. Someone does have the answer, because someone dreamed up that plan, and that plan was executed since the number of legal dollars doubled according to their own official reports. Who knew what, and when did they know what they knew? Why did Ben Bernanke double the supply of legal dollars in 2008, and what did all that power purchase? Barry Soetoro aka Obama may know. You don't. I don't. Ben Bernanke may know, which is something more than you or I know. We can guess. Doubling the legal dollars in 2008 is a very powerful thing to do, and a significant event to consider when considering the subject of the ongoing Trade War. What would happen, for example, if that power that was created by doubling the money supply in 2008, was spent on purchasing only Solar Panels, and then selling only Solar Panels to whomever will pay only the costs of making Solar Panels? You may think that I threw a rod, or that my brain just wandered off into some mysterious, insane, direction, having nothing to do with the subject of Trade War with China on one side, and The Dollar Hegemony on the other side, where The People are subject to whatever happens in that Trade War, and where U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is a mere cover for The Dollar Hegemony, and a temporary one at that, and so think differently, please, because it is important to invent a scale by which the full measure of the power contained within doubling the legal number of dollars: how much power is that much power? What can be done with that much power? Build a scale from which to measure exactly how much power is that much power. If only Solar Panels are purchased with that much power, as an example, then all that power is spent, and then all those Solar Panels are sold, and then all that power returns back to the source, and that is called an investment with an equitable return on investment, assuming that all the power spent does cause a return of all the power spent in due time. I picked Solar Panels as an example because Solar Panels work as an investment even if too many are produced, and that is a point that very few, if anyone, knows, or understands, except me. I am unique. You are too, therefore you can know this fact too, you don't have to follow the herd. Follow through, please. Suppose for the sake of ease in calculating the number of dollars in question that the number is 1 Trillion, an easy rounded off number to work with for now. Suppose that 1 Trillion dollars existed in early 2008, and then another 1 Trillion dollars was created by The Dollar Hegemony people, with Ben Bernanke as the front man, and now we have 1 Trillion extra dollars to work with, as we try to better understand exactly how much power is 1 Trillion dollars. I pick Solar Panels as a beginning method of inventing a scale by which 1 Trillion dollars worth of purchasing power is measured, and you can pick anything. You can pick chairs, or Battle Ships, or Nuclear Bombs, or new strains of viruses to be used in bio warfare, or you can hire 1 Trillion dollars worth of liars, torturers, and mass murderers, while I pick Solar Panels. There are books and web pages that instruct anyone wanting to know how to make their own Solar Panels at home and those are probably the cheapest Solar Panels, a benchmark of least expensive, and probably not the most productive examples of the highest quality and lowest cost Solar Panels, and those prices run around 200 dollars per Solar Panel and the output runs around 200 watts. Retail, for profit, the costs are much higher than 1 for 1. 1 Trillion dollars can make, not-for-profit, a number of Solar Panels, and as the for-profit competition continues forcing quality up and cost down, it is not unreasonable to use 100 dollars per Solar Panel as a mass produced one time expense whereby the 1 Trillion dollars is used to declare war on high electricity prices, in America, and all that money is spent making the current highest quality solar panels (low cost is a quality), or best bang for the buck Solar Panels, spending 1 Trillion dollars on just those Solar Panels, and then selling them, at cost, to Americans. The people running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion make 1 Trillion dollars "out of thin air" and they buy Solar Panels and they sell them, not-for-profit, or "at cost", and in 1 years time, on schedule, they sold every one, and now they have their 1 Trillion dollars back, one year later. 1 Trillion dollars spent on 100 dollar Solar Panels, each one producing 100 watts (most likely 200 watts per Solar Panel but the idea will still be conveyed and 1 is easy to calculate). 1,000,000,000,000 dollars Take away two zeros to find out how many Solar Panels 10,000,000,000 The price is very cheap, assuming that every solar panel is sold, at cost, and 1 Trillion dollars return back to The Dollar Hegemony, in one year. All the competition in the Solar Panel business go out of business, except for those who are hired by The Dollar Hegemony, but with that many orders for new Solar Panels, many new Solar Panel makers are need to fill the orders, so more Solar Panel makers are inspired to join in on the war against high power prices, for one year, and then things return back to something remotely resembling a free market after 1 year - after the war on high power prices is over, win, loose, or draw. 10,000,000,000 Solar Panels, each produce 100 watts, which is then 1 Trillion more watts of power being produced all over America in one year, and that extra power supply lasts for another 25 years or so, before the investment depreciates as the solar panels wear out. Whomever bought a Solar Panel is now generating their own electricity for the next 25 years or so, and they will pay off their costs of buying those Solar panels before 10 years are up, and therefore they will pay nothing for the electricity they produce for more than 15 years after regaining their initial investment. The Dollar Hegemony produces 1 Trillion dollars in 2008, declares war on high power costs, makes 1 Trillion new Solar Panels, sells them at costs, in a years time 1 Trillion dollars return to The Dollar Hegemony, so The Dollar Hegemony can then spend 1 Trillion dollars on something else; meanwhile the power to purchase purchased more power, and anyone buying Solar Panels pays off their investment soon, having bought those Solar Panels in 2008, and for many years to come those investors no longer pay for electricity, and some of them may have invested big, so they are selling, for profit, electricity to those who need more power, or selling to those who didn't invest during the war on high power prices. How many Solar Panels are 10,000,000,000 (10 Billion) Solar Panels? How much is 1,000,000,000,000 (1 Trillion) dollars? That is how much The Dollar Hegemony created, for investment, or just for fun, in 2008, for some secret reason, and they didn't buy Solar Panels for sale, at a profit, or at cost. What they did buy is a secret. Each home in America would need about 100 Solar Panels to run the home, run a couple of electric cars, and generate enough electricity to keep a steady income of money flowing from customers to their bank accounts. 100 Solar Panels is a lot of solar panels for one house. http://www.energy4living.hottipsonly.com/how-many-solar-panels-do-i-need-to-power-a-house.html Suppose, then, that the average buyer in the war on high power prices, back when The Dollar Hegemony doubled the money supply to make Solar Panels for sale at cost, was an average buyer who bought in big with 100 Solar Panels, at cost, at 100 dollars for each solar panel, spending 10,000 dollars each, paying that off before 10 years are up, and then having nothing but income for selling excess electricity for over 15 years after paying off the investment, then, how much is 1 Trillion dollars worth of Solar Panels: how many American investors would have that opportunity during that war on high power prices? 10 Billion Solar Panels divided by 100 Solar Panels each going to each investor during the war on high power prices, whereby The Dollar Hegemony spends 1 Trillion and then has 1 Trillion return back to The Dollar Hegemony in 1 year. 10,000,000,000 (the number of solar panels bought by The Dollar Hegemony and then sold to Americans at cost) take away 2 zeros (each American investor in the war on high power prices buys 100 solar panels) 100,000,000 (The number of American investors buying into the war on high power prices) 1 Hundred Million, or roughly every tax payer in America, during the war on high prices of power, invest and then reap the rewards of investment after paying off their investment in under 10 years and for the next 15 years or more they have no electric bill, instead they have an electric check, a steady income, for power they sell, because they make more than they can use, and people always need power. That is a way to know the full measure of 1 Trillion dollars worth of purchasing power such as the decision and execution of the decision to increase the total number of legal dollars in 2008 by Ben Bernanke or whomever told him to make that decision, and that full measure of that purchasing power purchased something, or many things, secret things. How does China work, now that is is knowable as to how The Dollar Hegemony works U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)? Where was Barry Soetoro aka Obama when Ben Bernanke worked U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) with that sudden doubling of the dollar purchasing legal power? How does China manage the division between the banking monopoly power, at home, and the government power? How does the Chinese system compare to The Dollar Hegemony system? Some data: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/business/energy-environment/25solar.html Backed by lavish government support, the Chinese are preparing to build plants to assemble their products in the United States to bypass protectionist legislation. As Japanese automakers did decades ago, Chinese solar companies are encouraging their United States executives to join industry trade groups to tamp down anti-Chinese sentiment before it takes root. Keep in mind, please, that lies must be accurately discriminated from facts, if the idea is to know the truth. Where does China get it's power to purchase? Did China, for example, double it's money supply in 2008, to keep pace with The Dollar Hegemony? Did China spend a doubling of their money supply on something too? What did The Dollar Hegemony buy when they doubled the money supply? What did China not buy, or what did China buy, to fail to keep pace with The Dollar Hegemony, or did China buy something to keep pace with The Dollar Hegemony in 2008? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/26/china-invests-solar-power-renewable-energy-environment The government body responsible for overseeing energy policy has finalised a proposal for billions of pounds of incentives for solar farms and rooftop panels, which will come from the government's £400bn economic stimulus fund. Rooftop panels, over Chinese homes, for example, could amount to lower costs of living, higher standards of living, for Chinese people who then have money to burn, creating demand, for something else, something other than lies, torture, and mass murder, on demand. What did The Dollar Hegemony buy? http://www.ourbusinessnews.com/a-wave-of-chinese-investment-buoys-small-american-companies/ Chinese investment in American companies rose to $5 billion in 2010, but that may be only the beginning of a tidal wave of direct Chinese investment in American businesses, according to a recent report that envisions another $1 trillion to $2 trillion of Chinese overseas investment this decade. Where does China get its power to purchase? Where does America get its power to purchase? What did Ben Bernanke buy when Ben bought into the doubling of the dollar legal purchasing power event in 2008? http://www.theage.com.au/business/the-great-china-bailout-20081110-5lpe.html The 4 trillion yuan plan, equivalent to about 20% of China's GDP, is the biggest injection of cash by a government in history, and is expected to have flow-on benefits for other economies including Australia as they battle to avoid recession. http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/american-people-are-not-table-china While announcements of $45 billion in exports to China are a nice sound byte, the reality is these are deals with companies such as G.E. & Boeing and Caterpillar, who already offshore outsource to China. Now it seems they are giving away critical advanced technology: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=f75fee31-aeba-4a13-b6a7-05adf56ccfe8 We also learned that the Fed's multi-trillion bailout was not limited to Wall Street and big banks, but that some of the largest corporations in this country also received a very substantial bailout. Among those are General Electric, McDonald's, Caterpillar, Harley Davidson, Toyota, and Verizon. Where does China get its power to purchase? Where does America get its power to purchase? Who is working to create a Trade War, and why? How long with The Dollar Hegemony remain in control of the worlds money supply, and therefore how long will The Dollar Hegemony continue to command the power to create world wide booms and busts, and perpetuate a world wide arrangement of harmonic business cycles? Will the victims gain enough power to defend against such abuse, or will some series of events cause a complete rearrangement of order in world politics and economics whereby the victims are then rendered powerless, once again, as a result of such events of such magnitude, and such destruction, that only a very few people just happen to profit from all the destruction that just happens to occur randomly?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 11:05 am | |
| Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Trade | Top |
