 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
While resting in a meditative type state, not yoga, not religion, just not doing work, having my focus of attention released from specific tasks, my thinking wandered back to the Trade War questions brought up by much of the News sources that cover the Blackout topic of China (from the U.S.A. Legal Crime versus Victims perspective).
I invented another angle of view and in this angle of view the concept of exchange is broken down into parts, and then reassembled into a language that intends to avoid confusion.
Exchanges (Between anyone in American and anyone in China for example) are either:
A. A net transfer of power in favor of one or the other participant in the exchange
B. An equitable transfer where no one gains at the expense of anyone else
The range of exactly how much one participant in any exchange gains at the expense of any other participant in any exchange is significant since a very small, or imperceptible, or immeasurable gain at the expense of any other participant is equity, it is the definition of equity, and only when the range of significance in gain, at the expense of, someone else, are exchanges no longer equitable.
That may be confusing, to the reader, but it is not confusing to the writer. The reason for viewing exchanges based upon a range, rather than "Black or White", Good or Evil, Equitable or Inequitable, is due to the nature of being. We are not all the same, and we are all individuals, and each situation is relatively different from each other situation, and somewhere in the middle of the worst case of inequitable exchange and the best example of an equitable exchange are all the actual exchanges. Moving closer to an equitable exchange, during the next exchange to be executed by the participants in the next exchange, anywhere on Earth, causes smiles, happiness, satisfaction, mutual agreement, common benefit, and cause for trust, cause for continued relations, good feelings, and other such obvious effects, that result from more, and more, and more movement that moves closer to the equitable ideal, even though the participants all understand that equity isn't perfect, someone may come out ahead, at the expense of someone else, while the exchange progresses through; during the process. Keep in mind that a participant in an exchange may be an innocent bystander, or an externality, someone as yet to be affected by a specific exchange, aggressive wars for profit being an example of how many innocent participants are affected as the exchange follows through in time and place.
Moving the opposite way causes the opposite effects, as participants resort to deceit, or resort to threats of violence, or resort to acts of violence, the exchange moves toward "making a killing", and participants learn to distrust, fear being "taken to the cleaners" occurs, as the actual exchange moves more, and more, measurably, more and more perceptibly, away from equity, moving much further toward inequity, as one end of the stick becomes stinky, rotten, and the other end of the stick turns to gold.
I'm not reporting fantasy. You are being shown how equity works, and you are being told how the opposite of equity works, and you are not being handed a pack of lies, whereby the word equity has lost its meaning, through duplicity, and through willful misuse. Equity is the opposite of inequity. Equity is not a synonym for equality. Equity is a happy event, in time, as exchanges follow through and as all the participants, internal or external, involved in exchanges are more fully satisfied with the mutual benefits that occur during equitable exchanges.
Trade Wars are the topic.
Trade is another word for exchanges.
There are words used to describe exchanges. You can call someone a buyer.
You can call someone a seller.
Why would you do that?
Take that apart, and put that all back together, and remove the superfluous language, remove the parts that constitute monkey wrenches thrown into the exchange so as to gum up the works, for some strange reason, for profit, or for fun. Someone invents lies for reasons. It is past time to declare war on falsehood. Be a warrior. Discover the enemy. Attack the enemy. Defeat the enemy.
China is a legal fiction. China is a word used to communicate a large number of people, a set of people, a list of people, all of the people who constitute that set of people, who are currently alive and living on Earth, and they are not included in the set of people called U.S.A. Inc. (LLC).
China, the word, means a specific thing, and it means, specifically NOT U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)
China is China
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is not China.
China means: all the people in China.
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) does not mean: all the people in China.
I am focusing attention on China, because it is clear to me that China is being BOOMED for a reason, and it may be a good idea to know that reason.
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is being BUSTED.
Do you contend with that assessment?
If you contend with that assessment, please do so in writing, and in that way you can equitably participate in this discussion, by offering something in exchange for what you read.
What is the full measure of a BOOM? What is the full measure of a BUST?
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)-------trades-----------China
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-China
What is the full measure of the net total of everything Made in China that is transferred from China as all that is Made in China moves to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)?
I've quoted someone's measure of some of the stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and from the article on Trade Wars items on the list of all the stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are boots used by troops sent to Iraq and Afghanistan by U.S.A. Inc. (LLC); boots made in China.
It can be known that if U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is conducting aggressive wars for profit, which is the supreme crime against humanity, then China is an accessory to those crimes, as China lends material support to the legal criminal aggressors who commit that supreme crime against humanity, unless, and this brings you back to the measure of equity, unless the exchange is inequitable. China can't be taking U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to the cleaners, and at the same time lending mutual support, to think so is to be duplicitous. Either China is aiding and abetting Legal Crime, or not, not both at the same time, in each case, such as the deal with the boots.
If the boots were purchased at a loss, whereby the boots went from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), while U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) paid much too much for those boots, whereby China gained, at the expense of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), then that would be a case of China "taking U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to the cleaners", whereby China "made a killing", in that inequitable exchange, and in that measure China injured U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and China did what it could to weaken the legal crime aggressors who commit the supreme crime against humanity, by making U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) spend much too much for the boots their troops wear as those troops obey those legal crime orders, as that legal crime war of aggression for profit, a supreme crime against humanity, is perpetrated in Iraq, and Afghanistan. Meanwhile China grows stronger at the expense of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) - if that is the case. If a troop disobeys a criminal order, who judges that act?
On the list of stuff moving from China to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are boots for troops, what else?
How much did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) pay China for those boots? Did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) have to buy Chinese dollars first, before buying boots for troops?
Please note how using the words Buy and Sell causes confusion. A transfer is a transfer. Why is one participant designated as a buyer? Why is one participant in a transfer designated as a seller? I will try to avoid such confusion, as time goes by.
What did U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) exchange for Chinese dollars, so as to receive Chinese dollars; what was transferred to China, from U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) so as to move Chinese dollars to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)?
You may think that I am wandering, on a wild goose chase, and you may not see any value on this path, and while you think that, I will offer you a measure of why this path is necessary.
Look here:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28831.htm
$10 Trillion missing from Pentagon since 1991
You look there, since I already went there, and since you may not have gone there yet, you may not understand how, or why, that connects to the subject of China and Trade Wars.
The idea of this topic, for your consideration, is China, and the coming Trade War, to know it, to understand it, and so as to help arrive at that goal, I offer a link to a person who has been down this path for some time now, and I will relink that web page, and I will quote again from that report.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GF16Dj01.html
Two decades of neo-liberal globalized trade have widened income and wealth disparity within and between nations. Free trade has turned out not to be the win-win game promised by neo-liberals. It is very much a win-lose game, with heads, the rich economies win, and tails, the poor economies lose. Domestic development has been marginalized as a hapless victim of foreign trade, dependent on trade surplus for capital. Foreign trade and foreign investment have become the prerequisite engines for domestic development. This trade model condemns those economies with trade deficits to perpetual underdevelopment. Because of dollar hegemony, all foreign investment goes only to the export sector where US dollars can be earned. Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies.
There are many ways in which to read, or understand, the message being sent by that person as that person uses those English words. I think it may be a good idea to read the intended message. The message appears to suggest that U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is gaining at the expense of China, and doing so in a specific way, as reported by the author of those words.
If that is what is being reported: I don't agree. My guess is that the author fails to separate all the people involved into four separate groups, and failing to do that causes confusion, and misunderstanding.
The Four Groups:
1. Legal Criminals based in China
2. Legal Criminals based in America
3. Honest productive people (victims) in China
4. Honest productive people (victims) in America
The nature of the connection between the Legal Criminals based in China and The Honest Productive People (victims) in China is not specified by me, or anyone, so far in this current focus. That connection between the Legal Criminals and The Honest Productive People (victims) in China could be much more specific as time goes by during this current focus.
The nature of the connection between the Legal Criminals based in America and The Honest Productive People (victims) in America is very specific from my viewpoint, and my guess is that a similar connection occurs in China, whereby the Legal Criminals resort to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence as they target the Honest Productive People so as to transfer all the power produced by The Honest Productive People to them, to The Legal Criminals, and they do so by gaining control over all forms of accounting, all forms of measures, all forms of currency, including language, news, money, raw materials, stocks, bonds, insurance, medicine, services, roads, land, food, water, and even air. Look at any report on the increase in pollution in China, and know how The Legal Criminals take over control of the air, if you have even a shadow of doubt concerning the validity, the measurable validity, of my viewpoint.
My focus here includes a goal by which the link between The Legal Criminals in China are established as those Legal Criminals connect to The Legal Criminals in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and the reason for having that goal is such that that connection will accurately identify the Cartel, it will accurately identify those who are working toward World War III, so as to profit by that war, as the Cartel moves operations from U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) to China.
Look at it this way:
U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)->->->->->->World Reserve Currency POWER->->->->->->->->China
All the other measures of inequitable transfers make sense when viewed from that ultimate goal of that inequitable transfer.
What if I am wrong?
I can offer a number of ways to measure how I will be wrong.
A. Purchasing Power Parity will not switch from favoring high wages paid to Honest Productive Americans to favoring high wages paid to Honest Productive Chinese People
B. Purchasing Power Parity will not become equitable, whereby Honest Productive Americans are paid more while Honest Productive Chinese People are paid as much (a function of increased production traded equitably)
C. World War III will reverse, aggressive wars for profit will stop, military expenses will decline, power will be invested toward producing more productive power instead of being employed to destroy.
D. In place of one World Reserve Currency will be free market competition in money markets world wide, and the highest quality legal money, at the lowest cost, will gain market share, and that form of money will be higher in quality than anyone has ever imagined at this point in human time, and the cost of that best, new, form of money will be lower than anyone has yet imagined at this time on this planet.
I do not want to simply skip past the troublesome use of English language contained in the quote so far offered, and I will repeat that quote again:
Two decades of neo-liberal globalized trade have widened income and wealth disparity within and between nations. Free trade has turned out not to be the win-win game promised by neo-liberals. It is very much a win-lose game, with heads, the rich economies win, and tails, the poor economies lose. Domestic development has been marginalized as a hapless victim of foreign trade, dependent on trade surplus for capital. Foreign trade and foreign investment have become the prerequisite engines for domestic development. This trade model condemns those economies with trade deficits to perpetual underdevelopment. Because of dollar hegemony, all foreign investment goes only to the export sector where US dollars can be earned. Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies.
What must be understood, it seems to me, is that the person writing those words, in English, is speaking code, and the code being spoken is founded upon deception, and as such there are many possible ways to interpret the words being written, and there are few things that can be accurately determined by those words.
I can try removing the last sentence, and from it there may be something that can be accurately determined.
Even the economies with trade surpluses cannot use their dollar trade earnings for domestic development, as they are forced to hold huge dollar reserves to support the exchange rate of their currencies.
It must be first understood: If a legal entity comprised of Honest Productive People (not criminals with badges) were to invent, then produce, and then maintain the highest quality legal money ever invented, produced, and maintained, even higher than all the past inventions, then the words written and quoted above would be meaningless.
The Legal Criminals who employ Legal Money to exploit The Honest Productive People in America are competing against The Chinese as The Chinese do what ever they are doing in China, as the Chinese people invent, produce, and maintain a Legal Currency, or Legal Money. Which money is higher quality and lower cost? The Dollar Hegemony is CURRENTLY very, very, very, low quality, and very, very, very, high cost, and it is CURRENTLY measured up as very low quality and very high cost because, as everyone knows, the producers of that money keep secret what they are doing with that money, and that alone measures up as very low quality, and very high cost. Added to the high cost of secrecy, and the low quality of secrecy, concerning what The Dollar Hegemony does with The Dollar Supply, are indicators, reports, and accounts of extreme abuse of The Dollar Supply, as for example, a report by The Federal Reserve System Operators (criminals) whereby the total supply of dollars doubled in 2008.
Doubling the money supply can be understood by analogy.
Suppose you have extra money and you want your extra money saved. You don't want your extra money to drop in value. You want your extra money to be as valuable, if not more valuable, tomorrow, compared to the value of your money today. When the Legal Criminals doubled the money supply in 2008, the value of your dollar is effectively cut in half, by that one decision done by that single decision making power. You may have worked 25 years of hard labor to get your dollars saved up by 2008, and one decision made by that one decision making power cuts your savings in half, at the stroke of a pen, or at one key press on a keyboard, as the Legal Criminal in charge presses Enter, and The Legal Money Supply is doubled in 2008.
Too bad for you.
That is a measure of quality, and it is very poor quality Legal Money.
That is a measure of cost, and it is very costly Legal Money.
You must know, by now, that The Legal Criminals didn't make that decision in 2008 so as to help you out of a jam, they made that decision because they profit from that decision, and they profit from that decision, obviously, at the expense of their targeted victims. You must know that by now. If you don't, you are way behind, and you are powerless from that ignorant position. Too bad for you.
Now, knowing that, you can now gauge, or judge, or discriminate, the relative quality and cost of the competitive Legal Money invented by The Chinese, produced by The Chinese, and maintained by The Chinese, compared to The Dollar Hegemony product, which, as you can see, is very, very, very, very, poor in quality, and very, very, very, very, high in cost.
How low can anyone go?
Do you know the meaning of the phrase "a race to the bottom"?
If The Chinese Legal Money is "better" than The Dollar Hegemony product, how is it "better"? If it is "better", then why don't we copy it, and use it, instead of The Dollar Hegemony product?
Don't question The Dollar Hegemony product?
What do you get, then, when you fail to invent, produce, and maintain an adaptive alternative to something that is measurably very destructive? Stay the course?
Are you insane?
Are you brainwashed?
Are you an ignorant, ready, willing, and able victim?
Please sir, can I have some more: torture, pain, work, misery, murder, for nothing in return, except more work, pain, torture, terror, misery, and murder? Why always the smelly end of the stick, if you have to ask the price, can you afford it?
Isn't it past time to turn that thing around? How about merely avoiding it altogether?
Back to the sentence:
Actually I have to edit and then move onto other activities.