Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Power Independence > News > News > Critical Thinking

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Critical Thinking  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Mon May 1st, 2006 04:07 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
The Truth

The Whole Truth

And Nothing But The Truth

SO HELP ME GOD

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/floyd2.html

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri May 5th, 2006 10:16 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhardt/engelhardt186.html

That one belongs here because I am the 'decider'

Here is how my decisions pan out:

http://austrianforum.com/index.php?s=d5928288ae2550cf26c0e3637f98a998&showtopic=737&pid=7097&st=20&#entry7097

Cross posting is rapidly becoming.

Becoming what? It is becoming current.

Science is Critical Thinking.

Perception or Reality?

To be or not to be?

One or zero?

Is or is not?

Reality, like a rock, is. We, like a rock, are.

The actual rock is even if we are not; but we wouldn't know it.

At the basic level, rather the static level, science concludes existence.

Like picking up a rock

The scientist concludes that the rock exists.

Science says: One is one.

Science confirms: One is not zero.

The scientist is assuming, of course, that the scientist can read and add.

Reality doesn't require that the scientist can read and add. Reality is or it is not and that fact doesn't require a scientist's science.

Fact: Existence

That fact remains to be proven.

I'm going out on a limb. My guess is that one fact is true.

One is not zero.

That is static. A decision. A perception. A fact. It was or it was not; now it is.

Meanwhile a few more facts appear to be occurring.

Within the one fact called existence there are more possible facts to consider.

The rock is one example. It was or it was not; now it is.

Science says:

Fact: Rock

Not so fast.

Science appears to be getting ahead of itself.

Fact: Existence

Fact: Rock

What happened between:

Fact: Existence

and

Fact: Rock

How about this:

Time

Between existence and Rock is something for sure and science had better keep that in  mind. One might call it dynamic.

Dynamic is not zero. Dynamic is one. Dynamic exists.

Fact: Existence

Fact: Dynamic

Fact: Rock

Existence is one not zero

Dynamic is one not zero

Rock is one not zero

Existence, Dynamic, and Rock are all one and not zero.

They are not all one.

Science becomes complicated.

Existence is x

Dynamic is y

Rock is z

Rock or z is the easy one.

Rock or z cannot exist for long without x and y.

Now a big problem occurs. Science is static and limited to one or zero.

It is or it is not. If it is, then, it is, if not, then, not.

Maybe

I think that human beings have a problem. We think in terms of oneness and that just doesn’t cut the mustard - well.

But it does look like oneness is all that we have to work with.

Is God one?
 
Maybe God can handle calculations beyond a simple switch:

One or zero?



 

 

 

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 03:56 pm  
Power Independence > News > News > Critical Thinking Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems