| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Critical Thinking | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon May 1st, 2006 04:07 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The Truth The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth SO HELP ME GOD http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/floyd2.html
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri May 5th, 2006 10:16 am |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhardt/engelhardt186.html That one belongs here because I am the 'decider' Here is how my decisions pan out: http://austrianforum.com/index.php?s=d5928288ae2550cf26c0e3637f98a998&showtopic=737&pid=7097&st=20&#entry7097 Cross posting is rapidly becoming. Becoming what? It is becoming current. Science is Critical Thinking. Perception or Reality? To be or not to be? One or zero? Is or is not? Reality, like a rock, is. We, like a rock, are. The actual rock is even if we are not; but we wouldn't know it. At the basic level, rather the static level, science concludes existence. Like picking up a rock The scientist concludes that the rock exists. Science says: One is one. Science confirms: One is not zero. The scientist is assuming, of course, that the scientist can read and add. Reality doesn't require that the scientist can read and add. Reality is or it is not and that fact doesn't require a scientist's science. Fact: Existence That fact remains to be proven. I'm going out on a limb. My guess is that one fact is true. One is not zero. That is static. A decision. A perception. A fact. It was or it was not; now it is. Meanwhile a few more facts appear to be occurring. Within the one fact called existence there are more possible facts to consider. The rock is one example. It was or it was not; now it is. Science says: Fact: Rock Not so fast. Science appears to be getting ahead of itself. Fact: Existence Fact: Rock What happened between: Fact: Existence and Fact: Rock How about this: Time Between existence and Rock is something for sure and science had better keep that in mind. One might call it dynamic. Dynamic is not zero. Dynamic is one. Dynamic exists. Fact: Existence Fact: Dynamic Fact: Rock Existence is one not zero Dynamic is one not zero Rock is one not zero Existence, Dynamic, and Rock are all one and not zero. They are not all one. Science becomes complicated. Existence is x Dynamic is y Rock is z Rock or z is the easy one. Rock or z cannot exist for long without x and y. Now a big problem occurs. Science is static and limited to one or zero. It is or it is not. If it is, then, it is, if not, then, not. Maybe I think that human beings have a problem. We think in terms of oneness and that just doesn’t cut the mustard - well. But it does look like oneness is all that we have to work with. Is God one? Maybe God can handle calculations beyond a simple switch: One or zero?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 03:56 pm | |
| Power Independence > News > News > Critical Thinking | Top |