| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page: ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... |
|
|||||||||||||
| The Big Picture | Rating:
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 09:46 am |
|
441st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article23267.htm
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 17th, 2009 02:12 pm |
|
442nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/World/Story/STIStory_417757.html
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Oct 4th, 2009 01:05 pm |
|
443rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23623.htm#United States President Barack Obama - now running three wars (Iraq and the AfPak combo) - demanded that Iran (which is not at war with anybody) demonstrate "its peaceful intentions or be held accountable to international standards and international law".
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 6th, 2009 11:48 am |
|
444th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/06/arab-states-have-launched_n_310826.html One barrel of oil contains a measurable amount of power and therefore a measurable amount of purchasing power and as such oil has become a global accurate currency. When the dollar is no longer chosen as the currency used in oil trading the purchasing power of the dollar will no longer have that measurable amount of power that is provided by oil power. What happens next? Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein trumpeted his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Oct 10th, 2009 10:32 am |
|
445th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/143180/war,_what_is_it_good_for_iraq_to_deal_oil_in_euros/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Oct 14th, 2009 02:58 pm |
|
446th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23708.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 11:33 am |
|
447th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20091014/156468599.html
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Nov 6th, 2009 08:54 am |
|
448th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.bushagenda.net/article.php?list=type&type=44
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 10th, 2009 01:17 pm |
|
449th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/11/09/surprise-unknown-asteroid-buzzed-earth/![]() . This is the third-closest known non-impacting Earth approach on record for a cataloged asteroid.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 17th, 2009 09:36 am |
|
450th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
![]()
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2009 06:58 pm |
|
451st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/barack-obama-hu-jintao-usa-china-electric-car-initiative.php
What? Is that another case of "destroy the competition"? Here is a company that is "forging ahead on thier own": http://www.teslamotors.com/ Jay Leno has an electric car: http://vodpod.com/watch/723221-jay-leno-and-his-tesla-roadster This just in: http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE5AJ41M20091120?rpc=64
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Nov 25th, 2009 05:21 am |
|
452nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091207/scahill/print Blackwater's Secret War in Pakistan By Jeremy Scahill November 23, 2009
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 19th, 2009 08:33 am |
|
453rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24219.htm War is peace, and falsehood is true. In that link above, please, note the connection between money and oil. Here is another good link: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/754.html
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 19th, 2009 11:26 am |
|
454th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/marshall5.1.1.html
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Dec 25th, 2009 10:16 am |
|
455th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24256.htm Superpower Part 8 @ aprox. 3.19 "...To undermine the threat of capitalism..."
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 31st, 2009 09:38 am |
|
456th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
OUTLOOK FOR 2010 INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jan 1st, 2010 05:24 pm |
|
457th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24291.htm
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 2nd, 2010 08:58 am |
|
458th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24302.htm A Super Power Of Near Demonic Dimensions
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 2nd, 2010 12:32 pm |
|
459th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
In the last post an interviewer asked a question where the interviewer used a label (left) and asked the person being interviewed (Chomsky) a question concerning that label (the left). Chomsky saw through the thinly veiled attempt to discredit the left and thereby make the right more appealing - better. See how that works? Suppose Chomsky didn't sweep the political hack job under the rug and instead of answering the question by qualifying the answer with a specific rejection of the label, what would have happened if Chomsky illuminated the attempted political game? Interviewer: "So is it a failure of the left then in the United States that war is not avoided?" Interviewed: "That depends upon what you mean by the left. If your version of the left and my version of the left are two different things, then what is the purpose of confusing the two? Interviewer: "What do you mean?" Interviewed: "If the left you have in view is a group of organized criminals who use law as a cloak so as to perpetuate their crimes, the label you use actually hides their crimes behind some nebulous legitimacy..." Interviewer (cutting in): I don't mean that... Interviewed (cutting in): "Really; then tell me exactly what you mean, give me some names, places, actions, motivations, etc., and not simply the speeches that claim to communicate motive; offer me the true reasons behind the actions." Interviewer: "That is going a little to far into specific details, I just meant the group of people who are democrats, not republicans - that left." Interviewed: "That is my point, then, so I'll go on with my point, if you don't mind. Is this a sound bite?" Interviewer: "No, no, go ahead with your point - please." Interviewed: "Thanks. The point is to point out how evil and only evil is served by this confusion of labels. If you ask a question about the left and that left is some ambiguous phantom, in your own mind, while I can clearly measure it as legal criminals who commit legal crimes upon their helpless, ignorant, and power-less innocent victims, and if your "left" (legal criminals) is confused with the left I intend to communicate, where my version of left is nothing more or less than people who don't plan on and then execute crimes upon innocent people, if now the two opposites are confused as being one and the same thing, both are "The Left" (when in reality there are two separate and opposing groups), what happens?" Interviewer: "What do you mean by 'what happens?'?" Interviewed: "You don't even know, and that is part of my point. What happens is that the good group (the left that doesn't plan on and then follow through with the plan to willfully and pre-meditatively injure innocent victims) is in a lose/lose situation. Do you see this now?" Interviewer: "Please just go on." Interviewed: "I can see your reluctance to take responsibility, to won this, this parroting of the political falsehoods that so well serve the legal criminals. Be that as it may, I can go on." Interviewer: "Lose/lose situation..." Interviewed: "Exactly; in a measurable way: the good people are now suspected of failure, of wrong doing, of being like the left that you have falsely associated with these good people. That is a negative for the good people, they lose power, they lose confidence, they lose momentum, they suffer libel, bad press, negative reinforcement occurs. The good people are grouped in the same group as the bad people and the mud sticks to them." Interviewer: "That may be true..." Interviewed: "But that is half the story, one side, and this has at least four sides, as such: 1a. Good people lose by gaining negative exposure by false association with bad people 1b. Good people lose by failing to promote positive exposure; in direct proportion to the opportunity having been stolen by false exposure. 2a. Bad people win by diluting their evil, having a false association with good people makes bad people look better, the good thoughts and good deeds of the good people are falsely attributed to the bad people. 2b. Bad people win by deflecting and avoiding the negative exposure by clogging up the air time, the bandwidth, with falsehood, confusion, misdirection, behavioral modification, response conditioning. Interviewer: "Isn't that somewhat convoluted?" Interviewed: "That is the point, yes, and who does it serve, and therefore who is most likely behind the process - if not the beneficiaries?" Interviewer: "Are you suggesting that I have something to gain by asking you a question concerning the left, and their failure to avoid wars?" Interviewed: "Did someone make you do it? Are you acting against your will, or your knowledge?" Interviewer: "I just wanted an answer to the question asked." Interviewed: "And you don't like the answer, it is too convoluted, where the confusion between a criminal left and a non-criminal left just so happens, perhaps "coincidentally", to benefit the criminals and injures, and removes power from, the innocent victims. Is that all just a coincidence to you, as you take your part in it?" Interviewer: "I just asked a question." Interviewed: "What exactly to you mean when you define this thing that you call the "left"? If... Interviewer: "Everyone knows..." Interviewed: "Please let me finish, although your interruption speaks for itself." Interviewer: "Go on." Interviewed: "If your answer doesn't accurately discriminate the precise difference between people who organize and pool, or collect, their power in the willful process of injuring innocent people and those who do no such thing, then your answer, your "left", doesn't accomplish something that is specifically important in the process of avoiding crime, or war when war is a crime, so who, who exactly, is responsible for not avoiding criminal wars - wars for profit - and what exactly is the extent of their failure, in a measurable way?"
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jan 4th, 2010 07:15 am |
|
460th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24310.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 01:50 pm | Page: ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... |
| Power Independence > News > News > The Big Picture | Top |