Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Power Independence > News > News > The Big Picture

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  ...  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
The Big Picture  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 10:55 am
  PM Quote Reply
381st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://current.com/items/89438469_america_s_secret_war

Is the US already at war with Iran? In "America's Secret War", Vanguard correspondent Mariana van Zeller travels to the Iraq-Iran border to investigate claims that the United States is supporting militant groups that are attacking Iran. In the rugged Qandil mountains, she meets with up with anti-Iranian guerillas who have been launching deadly raids against the Islamic Republic. A good percentage of the fighters are women, and Mariana accompanies a small group of them through what many believe has become the frontline of the US's secret war with Iran.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 11:09 am
  PM Quote Reply
382nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=2593
i think there's something wrong with voting lesser of two evils. voting for obama's slightly better domestic policy is like sedating yourself while the real problems with our system remain unaddressed. that's my two cents.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Oct 25th, 2008 08:37 am
  PM Quote Reply
383rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://blog.mint.com/blog/finance-core/visualizing-uncle-sams-debt/


Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 10:15 am
  PM Quote Reply
384th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/453.html

Is the world getting warmer?

Yes.

Has it ever been this warm before?

Yes, MUCH warmer and long before "carbon emissions."

Should we clean up industrial pollution?

Of course, but notice how the "global warming" hysterics conveniently let polluters off the hook.

We know EXACTLY who is putting mercury and other dangerous toxins in our air, soil and food. We don't have to guess. We know exactly what companies are doing it and where their plants are located.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 10:10 am
  PM Quote Reply
385th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

EXHAUSTION
The experts say that the traditional sign of a bear market climax is a panic sell-off of shares. This is called exhaustion. Exhaustion can produce a bottom. It also creates a sucker's rally.
In October 2002 the S&P 500 bottomed at 777. That was one of the strangest oddities in stock market history. On Friday the 13th, August 1982, the Dow bottomed at 777.
The S&P 500 arrived at 777 in a most intriguing way. It closed below 800 in mid-2002. Then it soared back to about 950. Then it fell back to 777. Then it soared again to about 950. Then it fell back below 800. Only in the first quarter of 2003 did it begin its long trek back up. It peaked in late October 2007. Then the rout began.
The bulls are waiting for the final sell-off. They tell people to stay in this market, yet they also predict a final sell-off.
It seems to me that it is better to sell your shares – all of them – and short the market. This way, you profit from the final sell-off. But the analysts never mention this strategy, let alone recommend it.

 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north662.html
 

There seems to be a disconnect between the stock markets of the world and the world economy. The Hang Seng index of Hong Kong is down by two-thirds over the last year. Yet the Chinese economy, while slowing, still seems to be growing above 7%. These are government-supplied figures. We should not take them too seriously. But the trend is still positive.
Are the Asian stock markets not forecasting really bad news to come in 2009? This is what bullish analysts ought to argue. We are told that the Hang Seng index is selling off because profit projections had been wildly optimistic a year ago. Maybe so, but the question remains: Why?
The answer is the Austrian theory of the trade cycle. The economic boom is created by rising monetary inflation. The bust occurs when the rate of monetary expansion slows. The Chinese central bank is slowing the rate of monetary inflation. It had pumped in money (M1) at a rate of close to 20% per annum for several years. Year to year in September, M1 rose at less than 10%.
In June of 2007, I predicted what I thought was going to happen in China.
The bubble in China resembles the bubble 1995–2000 NASDAQ in the United States. The Chinese stock market is trading at a price/earnings ratio above 50. Some stocks are trading at 80. In a speech on June 12, Alan Greenspan commented, "Some of these price-earnings ratios are discounting Nirvana." But let us not forget that the NASDAQ reached a p/e ratio of more than 200 in December, 1999.
In late January, I wrote this:
At some point, China's central bank will be successful in slowing price inflation. The economic boom requires ever-larger percentage increases of the money supply. By merely following the policies of the previous year, the central bank will produce a recession. If the central bank is serious about slowing inflation through interest rate increases, it will see its goal achieved. Price inflation will in fact slow. The cause of the slowdown will be a recession in China.
What could trigger this? A recession in the United States could. Falling demand for the goods produced by China's export sector will produce bankruptcies in China. They will order no more goods and services. These effects will ripple through the Chinese economy. In the absence of the recessionary efforts of central bank policy, these ripples could be contained by growth in the other sectors. But a reduction of Chinese economic growth is already in the pipeline. The central bank's policy of letting interest rates rise is sufficient to create a domestic recession.
China is now where I thought it would be. China is cutting jobs in the export sector. The government is intervening to save jobs – the standard approach of governments all over the world.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Nov 4th, 2008 11:24 am
  PM Quote Reply
386th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFA4B1rCKvg

This is a political collective.


http://www.repoweramerica.org/page/s/obamapetition

Last edited on Fri Nov 7th, 2008 01:35 pm by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 8th, 2008 11:11 pm
  PM Quote Reply
387th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/In_secret_agreement_Shell_nets_25year_1108.html

Royal Dutch Shell oil company and the Iraqi Oil Ministry have struck a secret, as-of-yet non-binding agreement that gives a monopoly over southern Iraq's natural gas to the energy giant. It marks the first time in over 35 years a Western oil company has played a major role in the country's most lucrative industry.

Signed Sept. 22 and obtained by United Press International, the "Heads of Agreement" document -- basically a legal framework for a contract -- delegates Shell sole access to the reserves for the next 25 years, with an option to extend that term.



They kill to get what they want.

http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/war/page/w_da.html



 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Nov 21st, 2008 10:40 am
  PM Quote Reply
388th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21282.htm

Don't get caught.

By whom?

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Dec 6th, 2008 11:35 am
  PM Quote Reply
389th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21387.htm

Barack Obama is on record as advocating a military escalation in Afghanistan. Before sinking any deeper into that quagmire, we might do well to learn something about recent Afghan history and the role played by the United States.

Less than a month after the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, US leaders began an all-out aerial assault upon Afghanistan, the country purportedly harboring Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist organization. More than twenty years earlier, in 1980, the United States intervened to stop a Soviet “invasion” of that country. Even some leading progressive writers, who normally take a more critical view of US policy abroad, treated the US intervention against the Soviet-supported government as “a good thing.” The actual story is not such a good thing.

Some Real History


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Dec 6th, 2008 11:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
390th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21393.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21394.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21392.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21391.htm

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Dec 8th, 2008 08:35 am
  PM Quote Reply
391st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvOUML5f7Z8

That is a serious problem.

Here are serious solutions, all of which have proven to be viable and all can operate at the same time where competition improves quality and reduces cost:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-parable-of-perfect-economy.html


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Franklin explained that "If for instance a first man raises fowl, and a second raises feed, and the first intends in the next season to double his production, he may approach the second, wanting him to produce the additional feed required. They agree how much of the production of each will be traded to the other, and their eventual contracts are evidence of their promises to deliver to each other."

"Their notes may then be circulated as currency."

"The cultivator of the feed for instance may write a note against the fowl to be delivered to him, to pay for a doctor to take care of his family. The doctor may pay for goods with the same note at the local store. The store then will ultimately collect the fowl originally promised to the cultivator. When the production is delivered, the respective notes are fulfilled, and the money passes from circulation."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its burgomaster, Michael Unterguggenberger, faced an empty treasury, because the unemployed citizens could not pay their taxes; roads and bridges needed repair and parks needed maintenance, for which the town could not pay; and idle men and women earned no wages.

He recognised that all three problems could be solved if he could find the connecting link.

That link was money. The three problems coexisted because no one had any of it, and his simple solution was to create money locally.

He issued numbered 'labour certificates' to the value of 32,000 schillings, in denominations of 1, 5 and 10 schillings, respectively. These became valid only after being stamped at the town hall, and depreciated monthly by 1 per cent of their nominal value.

It was possible for the holders to 'revalue' them by the purchase, before the end of each month, of stamps from the town hall, in the process creating a relief fund.


'The small town of Worgl in the Austrian Tyrol, suffering like every other town in Europe and America from the Great Depression, took the unlikely step of issuing its own currency'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.lysanderspooner.org/papercurrency.htm


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE principle of the system is, that the currency shall repre­sent an invested dollar, instead of a specie dollar.

The currency will, therefore, be redeemable by an invested dollar, unless the bankers choose to redeem it with specie.

Theoretically the capital may be made up of any property whatever. But, in practice, it will doubtless be necessary, in order to secure public confidence in the currency, that the capital should be property of a fixed and permanent nature, liable to few casualties and hazards, and yielding a constant, regular, and certain income, sufficient to make the PRODUCTIVE STOCK, here­after mentioned, worth ordinarily par of specie in the market.

The best capital of all will probably be mortgages; and they may perhaps be the only capital, which it will ever be expedient to use.

This capital is to be put into joint stock, held by Trustees, and divided into shares, of one hundred dollars each, or any other sum that may be thought best. [*10]

This Stock may be called the PRODUCTIVE STOCK, and will be entitled to the dividends.

The dividends will consist of the interest on the mortgages, and the profits of the banking.

Another kind of Stock, which may be called Circulating Stock, will be created, precisely equal in amount to the PRODUCTIVE STOCK, and divided into shares of one dollar each.

This Circulating Stock will be represented by certificates, scrip, or bills, of various denominations, like our present bank bills - that is to say, representing one, two, three, five, ten, or more shares, of one dollar each.

These certificates, scrip, or bills of the Circulating Stock will be issued for circulation as a currency, by discounting notes, &c., as our bank bills are now.

This Circulating Stock will be entitled to no dividends; and its value will consist wholly <fn1> in its title to be received, at its nominal value, in payment of debts due to the bank, and to be redeemed by PRODUCTIVE STOCK, unless the bankers choose to redeem it with specie. In law, the Circulating Stock will be in the nature of a lien upon the PRODUCTIVE STOCK.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://nasir-khan.blogspot.com/2008/04/islamic-finance.html


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Islamic finance centers on the religious tenets of Islam and operates in a way to keep Muslims compliant with sharia, the religious law that comes directly from the Koran. Islamic activists, intellectuals, writers, and religious leaders have always upheld the prohibition of riba, the interest charged by moneylenders, and denounced gharar, which refers to any type of speculation. Under this belief, money must not become a commodity in itself to create more money. Islamic finance thus shuns hedge funds and private equities, because they simply multiply cash by stripping assets. Money serves as a means or instrument of productivity as originally envisioned by Adam Smith and David Ricardo. This principle is embodied in the sukuks, Islamic bonds. Sukuks always link to real investments - for example, to pay for the construction of a toll highway - and never for speculative purposes. This principle springs from the sharia’s ban on gambling as well as on the prohibition of any forms of debt and activities that trade risk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An importer of foreign goods writes a letter to a foreign correspondent for goods to the amount of twenty thousand dollars. On their arrival, if he sell them for what they will “bring,” perhaps he gets forty thousand for them, which may be about eighteen thousand
over and above the prime cost and contingent expenses, Which he obtains for, perhaps, eight or ten hours’ labor in merchandising; which is about thirty-six thousand times as much as the hardest working man obtains for the same time. With this sum he could obtain one hundred and forty-four thousand times an equivalent from females at 12 1/2 cents a day, or that of two hundred and eighty-eight thousand children at 61 cents a day!
In Equitable Commerce the expenses of importation, insurance, etc., etc., and those of vending, would be added to prime cost, all of which would constitute ultimate cost, which would also constitute their price. The .labor of importing and vending would be paid in an equal amount of labor; so that if the importer employed ten hours in corresponding with the foreign merchant and receiving the goods, then he would get, upon equitable principles, ten hours of some other labor, which was equally costly to the performer of it.
If scraping the streets we’re doubly as costly to comfort, clothing, tools, etc., the importer of foreign goods would get five hours of this labor for ten of his own!

This would constitute the equitable reward of labor to both parties. COST being made the limit of price, thus works out the first proposition of our problem, the equitable reward of labor! Legislators! Framers of social institutions! Behold your most fatal error! You have sanctioned VALUE instead of COST as the basis of your institutions! Behold, also, the origin of rich and poor! the fatal pitfall of the working classes! the great political blunder! the deep-seated, unseen germ of the confusion, insecurity, and iniquity of the world! the mildew, the all-pervading poison of the social condition!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Dec 12th, 2008 01:10 pm
  PM Quote Reply
392nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21444.htm

On November 27 the Iraqi parliament voted by a large majority in favor of  a security agreement with the US under which the 150,000 American  troops in Iraq will withdraw from cities, towns and villages by  June 30,  2009 and from all of Iraq by  December 31, 2011. The Iraqi government will take over military responsibility for the Green Zone in Baghdad, the heart  of American power in Iraq, in a few weeks time. Private security companies  will lose their legal immunity. US military operations and the arrest of Iraqis  will only be carried out with Iraqi consent. There will be no US military  bases left behind when the last US troops leave in three years time and  the US military is banned in the interim from carrying out attacks on other  countries from Iraq.     

The Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), signed after eight months of  rancorous negotiations, is categorical and unconditional. America’s bid to act as the world’s only super-power and to establish quasi-colonial control  of Iraq, an attempt which began with the invasion of 2003, has ended in  failure. There will be a national referendum on the new agreement next July, but the accord is to be implemented immediately so the poll will be  largely irrelevant. Even Iran, which had furiously denounced the first drafts  of the SOFA saying that they would establish a permanent US presence in  Iraq, now says blithely that it will officially back the new security pact after  the referendum. This is a sure sign that Iran, as America’s main rival in the  Middle East,  sees the pact as marking the final end of the US occupation  and as a launching pad for military assaults on neighbours such as Iran.

      

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Dec 18th, 2008 11:13 am
  PM Quote Reply
393rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/429.html

The CIA is not supposed to operate inside the United States.

Yet, they have their own permanent agent in the Minnesota governor's office.


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Dec 20th, 2008 10:41 am
  PM Quote Reply
394th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/498.html

Abolish the federal reserve

Jim Rogers has made billions over the years betting on the direction of various national economies.

He's taken all this money out of the US.

He explains why.


Last edited on Sat Dec 20th, 2008 10:45 am by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Dec 28th, 2008 01:28 pm
  PM Quote Reply
395th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21538.htm

American mini-dictator generals and crime bosses knew that their global war plans would require massive numbers of committed killers, a goal that a volunteer force could not fulfill. A conscripted army of unwilling, underpaid, over-committed soldiers, who might follow orders to commit genocide, would be unsatisfactory for the task, especially when the focus of the killing turns to their own homelands. No, the committed killers who have volunteered to be underpaid and overworked in order to gain the right to kill were too few in number, so they had to be supplemented. This is the reason that the US has created massive armies and navies of high-paying "civilian" contract killers (mercenaries).

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Dec 31st, 2008 12:05 pm
  PM Quote Reply
396th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/28/BUA914SOEM.DTL

 

Banks pretty much stopped lending, financiers pleaded for government bailouts and the stock market tanked.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Dec 31st, 2008 12:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
397th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21587.htm

Brinkley's Discussion of 9/11 Brinkley's charge that Falk is unfit for his UN role is quite remarkable, given Falk's stature. He is Professor Emeritus of International Law and Practice at Princeton University and currently Distinguished Visiting Professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara. He has had published (as author or editor) over 60 books by academic and other mainstream presses. He is also widely respected and sought after as a speaker and conference participant.

Brinkley's case against Falk rests on linking him to the millions of Americans who believe the "unusual theory," as Brinkley calls it, that the 9/11 attacks were a "false flag" operation -- "a conspiracy planned and executed by the Bush administration." This is a theory of which Brinkley, he admits, had been unaware "until a row broke out last month between Falk and U.N. monitors who try to defend Israel."


 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Jan 12th, 2009 03:07 pm
  PM Quote Reply
398th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4713382n

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Jan 14th, 2009 07:19 am
  PM Quote Reply
399th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2451908450811690589&hl=en

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jan 17th, 2009 11:21 pm
  PM Quote Reply
400th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21780.htm

George Galloway's powerful speech in the House of Commons debate on Gaza, Thu 15 Jan 2009 (5.30pm), highlighting the hypocrisy and brazen double-standards of Western foreign policy towards Israel policies, including assassinations and other war crimes.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 01:51 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Power Independence > News > News > The Big Picture Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems