| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page:   ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   |
|
|||||||||||||
| It's the currency - STUPID! | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Oct 26th, 2010 11:41 am |
|
221st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul700.htmlAs the Fed continues to drive down the value of the dollar, the government accuses China of deliberately devaluing its currency, and the House has passed legislation aimed at punishing China for this alleged devaluation. The instability in the international monetary system, the decreasing value of the dollar, and the large amounts of new US debt could lead the IMF and countries such as China, Japan, Russia, India, and Brazil to abandon the dollar and adopt a new multinational currency. If all the legal criminals were as honest as Ron Paul, and Dennis Kucinich, the world would be right side up, instead of racing to the bottom. They are, however, players in the legal crime game. Return to you pretending to be The Fed and know that you can manipulate (buy) anything that can be bought within the legal reach of your power - things tied to the dollar, such as Oil. China can do the same. What can happen, with this type of legal crime, is two major things, or two paths taken by the players in the legal crime game. You and China can cooperate and agree to perpetuate your power to commit these crimes against your victims within your turf. You think I'm on crack still? What happens at the local High School where the drug dealer has a ready supply of victims to injure when a competitor comes along and sells drugs cheaper, and sells higher quality drugs in your turf? You don't know? Pretend that you are the Drug dealer working the local High School, this isn't that difficult. You give away the drugs at first, and then once the victims are hooked you jack up the price until the victims will do anything, literally anything, so as to get a fix. You have complete control over your victims now, at least until the ugly head of competition shows up. Now you have a choice. Deal with the new competitor. Do you agree to split up the High School into two separate turfs, or do you start a currency war? I'm not the one on crack, wishing for another economic boom to occur, fawning over politicians who promise good times, if we can just win this war on terror - etc.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 2nd, 2010 07:27 am |
|
222nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.projectcensored.org/ http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-global-plans-to-replace-the-dollar/
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Nov 14th, 2010 11:58 am |
|
223rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north906.html The bottom line there is the same thing as following the money to it's source. The case of "The Dollar" the money, the dollar, is followed to "The Treasury" at U.S.A. Inc. and this is where "The Money Supply" is increased as "The Fed" buys "Treasury Bonds". Bear with me here and please consider using your own brain to figure this out too, I have not worked on this in awhile, so the puzzle pieces are scattered again. Piece number one should be, and this piece must fit in somewhere, and it must fit in the right place, or the picture won't be recognizable, piece number one is the power to produce things that the power to purchase can purchase. 1. Power to produce That is piece number one and failure to have that piece in place, at the start, may be a beginning of confusion as all the other pieces are dumped out randomly. Number two on the list is the power to purchase and this power has to be powerful or it isn't a power, this power only becomes a power to purchase when it measures up in that capacity. 2. Power to purchase Since Gary North gave you the "pot at the end of the rainbow" with is humorous phone call article from China to "The Fed" chairman in good ole' U.S.A Inc., since Gary North did that, he accomplished the "follow the money (power to purchase)" chore to the source of it - where the power to purchase is produced. The power to purchase is produced at The U.S. Treasury. They, at the U.S. Treasury, produce Treasury Bonds - which have the power to purchase. That is the story there, and that is what I call "The Magic Check Book" which is a term I got from this link: Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, know the answer to this question. How can those people, those people who are at the end of the money trail, the "follow the money" to the source money trail, how can those people not be in the same game as the "follow the money" trail leads back to "the people who get the debt payments for The National Debt"? The saying "we owe it to ourselves" is often regurgitated by people. The National Debt of U.S.A Inc is a known amount of "dollars" owed by someone to someone, and at this time I'm throwing out one more piece of the puzzle. 1. Power to Produce (control this and you control the power to produce money) 2. Power to Purchase (otherwise known as money) 3. Competition (China can be seen as a competitor, so can Europe, and U.S.A. Inc) 4. Deception (also known as falsehood and "joined at the hip" is violence - falsehood and violence are linked forever together as one - might as well be one) If you can control deception you can control competition, and if you can control competition you can control the power to produce, and if you can control the power to produce you can control the power to produce the power to purchase or you can produce money - The Magic Check Book. Gary North gave you a look at The Magic Check Book, and so did Robert Newman. If you can control deception (and don't forget the inevitable twin of deception which is violence), if you can control the use of deception (and therefore the use of violence) you can eliminate all but one form of competition. You can fool (with deception) or destroy (with violence) the competition with deception (and the twin of deception which is violence). U.S.A Inc. can destroy China or visa verse, and then there is only one left standing - one Magic Check Book. If there are two Magic Check Books, if U.S.A Inc doesn't destroy China or visa verse - then it may be a good thing, right here and now, to look at what competition does. If competition exists, if it is a piece of the puzzle, if it is in the picture, if it works, then it does two things (if it isn't destroyed or deceived out of existence): 3. Competition A. Increases quality B. Lowers cost (price) If U.S.A Inc. produces "money" then U.S.A Inc. produces something that has the power to purchase, if it doesn't have the power to purchase then it isn't money - even toilet paper can have some power to purchase in some situations. There is the measure of money and therefore there is the "quality" of money. If completion is working (free from deception and the twin of deception which is violence) then the quality of money goes up - money can purchase more, and more, and more, and more, and more, as the quality of money goes up - because completion forces the quality of money to go up. If the "Dollar" is a better competitor compared to any other competitor, such as the Chinese Yaun, or the European Euro, or the Russian Ruble - then the "Dollar" can purchase more than those competitors. How can someone, anyone, know which producer in the money completion is winning? You have to measure the power to purchase by the unit; 1 dollar unit can purchase X. 1 Euro unit can by less than or more than X. Competition forces the best competitor to produce the most powerful money; where the winning competitor has 1 unit that can buy more than 1 unit of any other competitor. 1 dollar can buy 2 Euros. If that was true, then the dollar would be twice as powerful as the Euro. Competition does more, much more, as a human force, as a living force, as a physical power in the known universe (remember things like Evolution). Competition not only forces quality up, competition also forces cost (otherwise known as prices) down. If the "Dollar" had a price tag on it where someone buying a dollar had to pay 2 dollars tomorrow for 1 dollar today - then the price would be very high on the "Dollar' competitor. In 5 days time the Euro would look much better than the dollar if the Euro charged no price (no interest rate). This may seem like I have placed too many pieces of the puzzle on the table. I'll wind this up, and you can see for yourself if you bear with me a moment longer. Person A buys a dollar from the producer of dollars at a high interest rate of 1 dollar today must be paid back with 2 dollars tomorrow. Person B buys 10 euros from the producer of euros at a low interest rate of nothing, the payment of the purchase could be set as "debt", to be paid back, and time is now measurable as a price, "a rate of interest", and for now let's use 10 days. Person A has one day to make the dollar purchase something that will produce something more than 1 dollar - at which time Person A will have to pay back 2 dollars - or be guilty of failing to pay a debt. OH MY! Person B has 10 days to dream up and then execute a plan by which 10 euros are used to purchase something that ends up producing 10 euros. Which money is better? Who wins the competition? You can print your own checks right now. What will you buy? How much can you get away with, when you write zeros on your Magic Check Book account? This much: http://www.usdebtclock.org/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Nov 15th, 2010 11:05 am |
|
224th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/11/14/energy-with-peak-oil-passed-it-is-time-for-a-post-carbon-age/ Hi All, or anyone interested, That is one of the very few PEAK OIL NEWS items I read these days. Awhile ago I read about peak oil and from the first look I began looking deeper, and deeper, and deeper into peak oil. To sum up, if you don't want to read the latest NEWS on peak oil, I can say that the age of Oil is passing into history and a new age, with less, and less, and less oil USE is on the way in. As to the reasons for the passing of the OIL AGE into history there are many and much of the NEWS explaining these reasons are contradictory - in the extreme. Go to the gas station, I know you will, and fill up your car, or your truck, and know, just know it, know that you are paying more per mile than what you would pay if you were filling up your electric car with electricity. That is the bottom line here, and 10 cents per mile is 80% higher than 2 cents per mile which is the current average savings from Oil power to Electric power. Fill up your car. Know the facts. Before long everyone will know the facts, as the NEWS become real, and as Oil production lowers so as to cause Oil prices to go higher. I didn't read the rest of the NEWS linked above before beginning this writing project, but I am confident that it won't spell out the facts as I am doing right now. How much time did it take for human beings to stop traveling with horses and begin traveling with cars? How much time will it take for human beings to stop traveling at a cost of 10 cents per mile and begin traveling at a cost of 2 cents per mile? Oil prices will go up, sure, that is the NEWS. Every step of the way up is another step pushing the move from Oil power to Electric power and the margin of VICTORY for Electric power is already 80% cheaper. Then, if you are thinking in terms of the stability of the price of Electricity, you can know the facts here too. Right now the Electric Companies in our Fascist Dictatorship (behind the thin veil of "democracy") sell Electricity at very high prices because they own the monopoly. They can price whatever they want, and you have to pay it. You can't choose BRAND X. You have to choose BRAND Y. The proof of this involves making electricity at home, with your own Solar Panels, or your own Wind Generators, and then trying to sell excess Electric power to your neighbor - at half price. Try it. That is competition in action and that causes the price of electricity to go down - not up. Not only does higher Oil prices drive the Electric car market faster and faster, not only that, the Solar Panel (and Wind, which is solar) market drives Electric power prices down - so the gap widens as time goes by. Right now there are a number of start up companies selling Solar Panels to people who want to pay less for Electric power. You call them up, you pay less for electricity - guaranteed. That is now happening because Solar Electric Power is cheaper BY FAR compared to Electric power produced by the Fascist State Dictatorship stuff - unless, and this is a big possibility, the Fascist State Dictatorship stuff is still very cheap to make, but the price is way, way, way, and way above the cost to produce it - in other words they could be raping the consumers by jacking up the price - because they can - because they have a monopoly (sort of) and because they have the license for raping the consumer. LLC, or Limited Liability Corporation, has one legal meaning for regular people (consumers, workers, whatever makes a regular person regular) and another meaning for PG and E or Edison, or Goldman Sacks, or The Federal Reserve (LLC). That is called: Dictatorship - that is not what was once known as democracy (where political power was once known as everyone is the king, and no one is legally above anyone else, "king in his castle" stuff - once upon a time, and I can show you the proof, the evidence, and the accurate historical record - it is an up side down world these days - black means white, good means bad, etc.). So, read the link, I'm going to finish it, and see if you find the whole truth, or if you find some things, vital things, missing.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Nov 18th, 2010 09:55 am |
|
225th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north908.html
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Nov 28th, 2010 09:51 am |
|
226th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26917.htm Someone unfamiliar with the Global Power Struggle (I use the term: Legal Crime or Legal Organized Crime Business Turf Battle) may think: "What, the Russians used Dollars and now they are "ditching" the dollar? How can that be?" Take a few minutes and prepare for an entertaining look at how that works here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159# When Russia (the organized legal crime ring - not everyone within their turf) can no longer afford to trade dollars for things (like oil) the Global Power Struggle is heading for a big "adjustment". This is big news, the kind of "NEWS" that could be Front Page news - but it isn't - and that alone should tell you something important about your local "government" (you own legal crime ring).
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Nov 28th, 2010 11:14 am |
|
227th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5289-the-fed-defending-the-indefensible
What they fail to mention is the reduction of the money supply by half that causes the bust. They only mention the cause of the boom - this is a HUGE omision.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Nov 29th, 2010 07:27 am |
|
228th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26936.htmOn Thanksgiving eve the English language China Daily and People’s Daily Online reported that Russia and China have concluded an agreement to abandon the use of the US dollar in their bilateral trade and to use their own currencies in its place. The Russians and Chinese said that they had taken this step in order to insulate their economies from the risks that have undermined their confidence in the US dollar as world reserve currency. If that is true: the human species is entering a new age. The passing age is domination of the species by the U.S.A., also known as "The Dollar Hegemony". Before that group dominated the human species the greatest power on earth was a group called The English Crown or some other such label. The dominant group can be measured by following the money, more or less, it depends on who measures the value of the money being followed, how it is measured, and this is an important distinction. You can't just follow any money to find the dominant group. The dominant group collects power (money is the power to purchase or it isn't) from the many as power flows to them from the many; including all the less powerful groups, all the groups that are dominated by the dominating group. This is fact, like looking at the Sun will burn out your eyes, and like sticking your hand in the fire will burn your hand. You can trick the truth told to you, here, by saying such things as: "You are not telling the truth here, in fact, I look at the sun often, and my eyes are not burned out." What is the point? My point, is to point out, how a new age is dawning. This is a fact, it is occurring in your time. The people who are dominated by U.S.A Inc. (AKA The Dollar Hegemony) include the people who are called "the tax payers". This group includes all the people who use Dollars, and you think I may be Joe King. I'm not. The Russians and the Chinese leaders, their spokespeople if nothing else, no longer want to pay taxes to the dominant group, The Dollar Hegemony. Within the tax paying group are those whose options are less powerful, less numerous, and in this group are all the people who reside within the boarders of the legal entity (legal fiction) known as U.S.A. (LLC). These tax payers have two options when dealing with the choice of tax payments: A. Pay, or B. Leave The people within the boundaries of U.S.A Inc. (LLC) are known throughout the rest of the world, if you care to look, as torturing mass murderers, much in the same way as the people within the boundaries of U.S.A. look at the people who lived in Nazi Germany. I'll leave you with a look back, which may help in knowing what is on this road: http://www.amazon.com/Voices-Third-Reich-Oral-History/dp/0306805944 That is a book by a German Fighter Pilot, not a political person, the German Air Force was not a political power, it was (and I suppose it still is a military power which is a distinction worth discriminating in much greater detail), where the idea was to document the thinking done by many people in Germany during the Nazi reign of political power. The Nazi political power never dominated the human species, not like The English Crown, and not like The Dollar Hegemony. The book can serve as a warning to anyone who "believes" in the rightness of what The Dollar Hegemony is doing today. Such as invading other places, such as Iraq, and such as Afghanistan, torturing, mass murdering the innocent, for profit - or just for fun. Any rational human being now knows that the excuses told by the spokespeople for The Dollar Hegemony, the Bushes, and the Obamas, any of them, are lies - lies covering the truth. The power to "believe" in those lies will vanish in time. I'm pointing out how the time when belief in those lies is powerful, able, capable, real, and present, is evaporating. The people, the group, no matter what name they have written on their stationary, who dominate are the ones who dictate what is to be believed by the people they dominate. Know or don't, I can't dictate understanding - that is within your power.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 11th, 2010 02:38 pm |
|
229th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north919.html
Real treat? First thing to understand, if you are to borrow my many years of unraveling this great deception, is to know that an alternative to any Doom associated with The Dollar crisis (created on purpose) is not only possible, it is easy, as easy as is the concept of competition. Competition is an easy concept. Producer A produces crap and charges a very high price. Producer B produces high quality stuff and charges a very low price. Product A (crap at a high price) and Product B (high quality stuff at a low cost) are on the same shelf and you are there to buy one of those products. How simple can it get? You may scoff, and call me a nut, but why would you jerk your knee that way? I've unravelled this scam, and it is as easy as I am telling you. Any complication serves the people who make DOOM, that is what they make, they produce DOOM, it is their business to do so, they have a vested interest in creating and maintaining DOOM, as Doom is half of their "business cycle", the other half is another thing that they create, and that other thing that they create is called BOOM. Two links for you to help you understand this very, very, very well: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ The criminals (legal criminals) buy stuff - what do you think they buy? As serious as it gets. The thing to watch for now, it seems to me, is where the power goes from here, as the power goes to the new "investment", and that new place where the power goes appears to be Asia. If you wonder why workers in Asia are willing to work for so little, and if you wonder why people in America (U.S.A. Inc. LLC) are paid so much more for doing less, then use that questioning to know what it will be like when power shifts from U.S.A. Inc LLC to whatever will be the new monopoly power (by any name is smells the same) in Asia - or wherever the power (to steal with a banking monopoly) shift to - from The FED. The fix, the way to avoid becoming the desperate people who will work almost any job (or any job) for less than a living wage, is a medium of exchange that avoids criminal manipulation by criminals (legal or otherwise). A competitive currency product is the easy solution. Product A is crap, and it costs a lot, and that product has a measure of both quality and cost here: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ The simple fix is not a worse product that cost more, as some people may lead you to believe, to buy into, to swallow whole. The simple fix is a connecting medium, an honest one, an accurate one, one that avoids manipulation by criminals, a high quality product, and a product that is less expensive to use, and there are many examples of these types of products in history, in actual use, and there are many examples of these types of products as yet to be used as such - prototypes, on the drawing board, or just ideas as yet to be produced. If The Dollar loses its value it will be replaced by something more valuable as a medium of exchange used by a large number of people - this is what is happening - these days. This is as NEWS worthy as the green traffic light ahead of you, while driving, as it turns yellow. http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Dec 12th, 2010 08:10 am |
|
230th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/celente/celente57.1.html My viewpoint on that is not all DOOM. The Power to create BOOM from DOOM, and DOOM from BOOM is also called: The Business Cycle - which deserves an explanation while moving into the topic of CAFR. CAFR is Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports. Briefly: City, County, State, and Federal governments keep books. On one set of books are: Net income Net expenses Net balance On the second set of books are: Budget projection Budget shortfall Public knowledge (brainwashing propaganda) Since World War II, in America, where U.S.A. Inc. LLC rose up from under some rock, the ability of the people here to make more than they consume has been stolen by a complex scam involving the use of monopoly money creation POWER to move all titles of properties from those who create power to those who steal it. Those who steal power, from those who create power (create more than they consume), cause a BOOM to happen - such as the BOOM following the DOOM called The Great Depression. World War II was a BOOM - and a big one. Germany was made to BOOM first. From DOOM, where there wasn't any "money" around - for some strange reason. Somewhere the viewer has to step into the cycle and look forward as the cycle plays out, so I won't go backwards at this point and point out, in detail, how The Great Depression was constructed - looking forward at the BOOM called World War II, one can see America making many, many, many, many things, thousands upon thousands of airplanes - for example. Who gained many of the titles for all the stocks, bonds, interest earning loans, mortgages, and real estate properties, and other properties during that Depression preceding that Boom? Many, many, many people had to sell off farms, homes, stocks, titles, valuables, properties, and Gold was confiscated by the government, in those days, and even Cows were ordered to be killed and buried, crops where ordered to be burned, and where did the power of control over all the excess production go to? Depression = sell off by the desperate. Who bought all that stuff up at basement prices? Then BOOM. Who profited off all that production of airplanes being sold to the government as the government conducted World War II? Look into CAFR - those books, as far as I know, are the only books that ever were discovered by The Public, where the net incomes, net expenses, and net balances are documented. You may say, because you're taught to say, all those profits went to private individuals. All the people in all the governments are private individuals. You should know this fact, why don't you? You may argue, at this point, because you know how you should handle someone like me, and your argument is this: Some people are not private individuals, some people are "public servants". Now is a good time to expunge such brainwashing from your brain - use facts to clean out the waste. When The Business Cycle is used it is used to move titles, ownership, and control of excess production (production over and above consumption) also known as surplus value. A BOOM is created and accelerated by injecting more and more money into a social network and the result is greater production above consumption and increasing prices. If everyone knew exactly when a BOOM will go BUST then everyone knows exactly when to sell titles to property at the top of the BOOM, when prices are highest, and everyone then has lots of CASH to use while the BOOM goes BUST and then everyone knows when to buy all those titles back; when prices are at rock bottom - often less than the cost needed to replace the things that have titles. Everyone doesn't know, and why doesn't everyone know when a BOOM is going to end and a BUST is going to begin, or when a BUST is going to end and a BOOM is going to begin? Everyone doesn't know that public servants are lying criminals - either - and there is a correlation. On one set of books are: Net income Net expenses Net balance On the second set of books are: Budget projection Budget shortfall Public knowledge (brainwashing propaganda) Net balance is hidden from the public, not advertised, not disseminated, not a part of public knowledge, because the so called public servants no better than to let the public in on such things as net balance. What is force fed to the public is the Budget shortfall. Public servants say: We are broke. Believe one of those public servants, who may be honest, if not knowledgeable about such things as net balance, when they say "we are broke" and they can't afford to pay the rent - themselves. Some are public servants to a degree; all must have some self interest, or the self becomes too weak to give any more. Why would you believe someone who says: "we are broke", as they drive off in a limo to their summer home for vacation? Here again: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ Every dollar is owed to someone. If that someone happens to be connected INSIDE the FED group, they don't need money, they can make dollars by adding zeros to their bank account any time they wish. They use money to take control of the property, the surplus wealth, and to take control of the people who produce it. Without that connection to them, or without that connection by them to us, there would be a different connection connecting all of us, and what would that connetion be - better or worse? Again: http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v105/__show_article/_a000105-000002.htm The DOOM is connected to The Dollar producers, no different than DOOM is a connection between a Heroin addict and a Drug Pusher. The medium of exchange moves power from the Heroin addict to the Drug Pusher - it is a one way street. You can claim that the Heroin addict volunteers, eagerly, to be connected to the Drug Pusher. What happens when a second Drug Pusher tries to take over the turf, to own the addict? It isn't voluntary, far from it. You must pay taxes with dollars, and that is how the FED maintains control over its turf. No matter what else you may use as money you still have to buy dollars to pay taxes, and try buying groceries with a personal check. How do you open an account without dollars? If everyone in one State, in America, this U.S.A. Inc. LLC started using a different money what would happen? What do you think caused The Civil War? What do you think caused The Revolutionary War? How about words from someone who was at The Revolutionary War? http://21stcenturycicero.wordpress.com/fraud/how-benjamin-franklin-made-new-england-prosperous/
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Dec 19th, 2010 05:19 pm |
|
231st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm#4 The Parasite City More modern version: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27083.htm
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 21st, 2010 11:45 am |
|
232nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Foreclosures There is a fix, a simple one, and it removes the power held by criminals, such as these, over their victims. The simple fix is also the most powerful fix because the simple fix connects all the most powerful people together into one powerful group. The simple fix is easy to understand, not easy to accomplish, but that is because political power in the hands of those who are adamantly, vehemently, and even violently, against the simple fix, is greater. The political power struggle includes the power a group of people have over another group due to an imbalance of knowledge. Group A, the more powerful political group, knows: while Group B, the less powerful political group is ignorant. In this case the more powerful political group have control over the power to create money, and from that power they then have the power to spend money. The less powerful political group pays all the costs associated with any purchases executed by the more powerful group. The less powerful group include all the people who think these words are false, inaccurate, or even misleading. There is no greater political concern that this one and the more powerful group knows this fact, while the less powerful group is literally ignorant of this fact. So, the simple fix is simple, and easy, but not likely to be implemented because the more powerful political group knows that the simple fix will work, and the less powerful group is ignorant. The ignorant masses of less powerful victims can judge for themselves, or if not, remain both ignorant, and less powerful. The simple fix to be implemented by the less powerful group is to regain control of legal money, to arrest it from the legal criminals who now abuse this power. The measure of the abuse, by the people who abuse this power over legal money, is exemplified by the News Report linked above, and this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Now, to help illuminate the simplicity of the workable, and powerful, fix to the problems that have grown to such an incredible proportion by these measures, I can move onto a more detailed version of how the fix can be implemented - in reality. If U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) also known as The Federal Government were to offer The People (meaning everyone who pays Federal Taxes to U.S.A. Inc. LLC), two new financial products, then The People would fix this problem from that day onward. Product 1: No interest mortgage loan on the primary residence and/or a business interest (a second Real Estate Property in addition to the primary residence). Product 2: One percent interest earning loans for the purchase of any product that is proven to be a more efficient consumer/producer of physical power (such as Solar Panels, Electric cars, Wind Generators, Modular vertical farming units, etc.) The complexities that can occur during the implementation of this fix include all the complexities generated by all the people who are out to get something for nothing, at any cost, and these types of people plan on passing on those costs to someone else - as a rule. Example: Someone known to borrow money and then refuse to pay it back, even though they are able to pay back the loan, are people who create complexities associated with the simple fix; however, there is already in place an easy and effective remedy for such problems, and that remedy is known as a FICO Score. http://www.myfico.com/crediteducation/ I'm going to hit a work limit soon, so I'll have to post this much and then continue on another post.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 21st, 2010 12:48 pm |
|
233rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The less powerful political group happens to be the most powerful economic group, and the reader may well learn Joe's Law better, if this is a confusing concept. The producers of wealth, power, economic power, are the most powerful economic group and they happen to be the less powerful political group, due to a curious human characteristic; whereby honest people make the best cooperative producers of wealth, and dishonest people make the best criminals/politicians. Not all politicians are dishonest; exceptions to the rule include: Ron Paul Dennis Kucinich Mike Gravel Everyone is capable of dishonesty, the point is that some people employ dishonesty in the crime business, and that includes legalized crime, such as a Money Monopoly Power used to transfer all the wealth from the producers of wealth to the legalized crime bosses. And, again, if you the reader think these words are inaccurate, false, or misleading, which group are you in? A. More powerful political group B. Less powerful political group Are you on the receiving end or the "giving" end of the National Debt? Net balance accounting, please, not the second set of books - please. Back to the simple fix and the two products that could be on the financial shelf at every franchise store where they sell monetary products. Think in terms of Wallmart if you don't understand what a franchise is, and then think in terms of any Bank being a franchise too. Banks sell money. The simple fix is two new money products, for the consumers of money products. You have to shed a lot of brainwashing to be in a position to conceive of, let alone implement, the simple fix. Product 1 is the no interest mortgage loan offered to anyone with a good FICO score, anyone who has earned a good credit rating, anyone who prefers to get a higher quality product, at a lower cost, and Product 1 can thereby compete against every other mortgage on the planet Earth. You have a good credit score, you earned a good credit score, you have an income, and now you want a home and a business building, what are your choices now? Product 1 offers a choice whereby no money, no credit, no wealth, no power to purchase will transfer from the borrower to the lender: no interest, none whatsoever. How many wage earners, workers, people who produce wealth will turn in their old mortgages, even move out of their old homes, and get a new mortgage, one that does not transfer any power from them to anyone else, once this product hits the shelves at the local money franchise? You could even open up your own Money Franchise business on Main Street with your Product 1 loan - and pay no interest. Now, the people reading this may have stopped reading this, and so be it, I've heard the accusations of accuracy, falsehood, stupidity, on this type of thinking, and what comes next addresses some of those accusations - for those who read on - soldier on. In business there is a concept that can be expressed as: Give away the razor to sell razor blades. Product 1 is the give away, and product 2 is the way that the lender makes money to cover all costs including the cost of living for all the workers in the lending business. Product 2 charges 1 or 2 percent interest and here is where some numbers help illuminate 2 things. 1 thing that numbers help illuminate is the power that is, and the number 2 thing illuminated is the power that was: transferred from the producers of power to those who managed to get it. Where did all the power to produce, in America, go? Think about that, some. Suppose, now, that an easy number of people in America buy Product 1 and that easy number is 1 Hundred Million People. Like this: 100,000,000 That is a lot of loans to process by all the people who will be processing these new loans. 30 years later, at an average of 10% interest, how much money transfers from those 100 million people, to the people who have the money loaning franchise? Are you the least bit curious? How about an easy way to compute this, without too much effort? http://www.mlcalc.com/#loan-100000-30-10-12-2010-year Suppose that the average home price was 1 Hundred thousand dollars. Roughly: the cost of the home plus two more homes are sent from the buyer of the home to the people running the legal money monopoly business. Exactly: 100,000 borrowed 10 percent interest 30 years 315,925.77 paid by the borrower to the lender Now times that by 1 hundred million I don''t have enough room in by brain to accurately know the full impact of that number. To be fair, if possible in these types of political games, use the number 200,000 dollars to represent the money sent to the lenders from the buyers that is above the actual cost of the home. So: 200,000 times 100,000,000 200,000 dollars (units of legal money) per home 100,000,000 people buying homes with loans These are only zeros, so the math is very easy, just add the zeros: 20,000,000,000,000 Have you ever seen such a number? That is the number that represents the wealth that has transferred from the people who earn an honest living and the same wealth that has transferred to those who squeeze every last dime from that scam - not the workers behind the desks at the local offices. It does not cost double the price of a home to process a loan - know that much. I'll post and then return to elaborate more on Product 2, where the people selling product 1 and product 2 earn their living - honestly.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 21st, 2010 01:10 pm |
|
234th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Product 2 may not be for everyone, yet, but few people can afford to pay more for less now, why pay more for less now, when you can't afford to - now? Math is so simple, and this math can be proven - simply. Solar Panels can now be purchased by a home owner who wants to lower the price paid for each watt of electricity used - that is a documented fact. Facts should definitely be questioned for validity so I can offer a simple observation - without a link to a seller. The sellers are now guaranteeing a lower electric bill to the buyers of Solar Panels. Check it out. If the idea can be understood; however, then the idea must be understood as a check on any loan that qualifies as a product 2 loan. The collateral of the loan includes this ability to save on power costs. Then, for another example, look at the cost per mile on electric cars which are now reported as: Electric: 2 cents per mile Petroleum: 10 cents per mile A buyer of product 1, with a much lower monthly home mortgage payment, may also buy a product 2 loan to start a new taxi service in his, or her, home city, and how competitive can this new taxi service be if he, or she, also starts producing his, or her, own motor fuel in the form of home grown electricity? Local Taxi service A: Petroleum cars at 10 cents per mile Local Taxi service B: Electric cars at 2 cents per mile How can you not see this, I ask myself, when, in fact, Local Taxi service A may also be mathematically illustrated as such: Local Taxi service A (without product 1 or 2): Petroleum cars at 10 cents per mile Home mortgage at 5 to 10 percent interest Business mortgage at 5 to 10 percent interest Electric costs higher by approximately 10 percent Local competitor resulting from the easy fix Taxi service B: Electric cars at 2 cents per mile Home mortgage at 0 percent interest Business mortgage at 0 percent interest Electric costs (fuel for the cars) at 10 percent less cost Is that too simple? What power do you think is behind the power that complicates any fix to the supposed problem?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 22nd, 2010 08:25 am |
|
235th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelpollaro/2010/12/20/monetary-watch-december-2010-the-money-supply-a-triple-from-here/Third, and most important, private banking institutions are not only continuing to print money, but appear to be doing so at an accelerating rate. In fact, Uncovered Money Substitutes, i.e., bank deposit liabilities not covered by bank reserves, the issuance of which is the result of the banking systems’ efforts to lever up its loans and investments on top of what is currently a mountain of excess reserves, is growing at a year over year rate of 19.9%, a post credit crisis high.    
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 23rd, 2010 10:34 am |
|
236th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
End The Fed - really? Many types of banking systems can work, and have worked, to accomplish many specific jobs, as the bankers employ banking systems toward the work of accomplishing the jobs that the system is designed to accomplish. Please, please, please understand that much; before moving on to any other inspection of any banking system. Banking is a tool. What is the tool used for, and who must have it, or without this tool the goal cannot be accomplished? Put on your thinking caps and go along with me as I describe an end result that I want to accomplish and while I describe this goal you, the reader, can begin to think up a method by which this goal can be accomplished - and from this work we can see if we are looking at something worth having. I want to transfer as much power as I can from everyone else to me. I want to make the power I have greater, at the expense of everyone else, and I want this transfer of power to continue indefinitely, even to a point where I have everything and everyone else has nothing, even to a point where everyone else must ask me for permission to breath; failing to ask permission is death by suffocation. Failure to ask me for permission to eat is death by starvation. Failure to ask me for permission to drink is death by dehydration. What tool can I construct so as to arrive at my stated goal, and I'll give you a few minutes to dream up a tool first - then I'll tell you what that essential tool is, and we can see who has offered a more competitive tool - a tool that will do the job better - OK? Meanwhile I am going to find and link a neat link someone else sent to us, and I watched the video on the link: Not break it more What did you think up as you thought up a device by which everyone else sent you power up until the point where you have all the power and no one else has any? If you thought up a device similar to a State Banking Monopoly, then I can compare that idea to mine. Here is mine: Falsehood You can't implement your idea without mine, and I'll tell you why in case you haven't already understood why - like understanding how breathing is necessary to stay alive, and how sticking your hand in a fire may cause you to say ouch. Understanding can be intuitive, as well as reasonable. If you make this thing and you use things thing to accomplish your goal how can you do so if your victims are fully aware of it before you even begin to use it? A. You have a goal and the goal is to transfer all the power to you, from everyone else. B. You design a State Banking Monopoly as the tool you are going to use to accomplish your goal. C. You begin to connect everyone to you with this tool. How do you go about the work of making the C job above happen, in real time, in real reality? A. You tell the truth B. Not A Really? Do you really want to vote for someone who wants to construct and then perpetuate a State Banking Monopoly device? What does this person say when this person describes what this thing is supposed to do, what does this State Banking Monopoly do, what is the goal in mind for this State Banking Monopoly thing; why is it constructed, what is it's purpose? I won't get any answers; because I know the reason, and I can expose all the lies that have and will be constructed to make such a thing work. Falsehood is necessary to make such a thing work, without falsehood the power no longer flows from the many to the few in that way - the scheme ends.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Dec 27th, 2010 11:19 am |
|
237th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
So, let us begin. First and foremost, a government-guaranteed gold standard is a rotten idea. It is just a little better than a fiat-money standard. But advocates of "the gold standard" almost always mean "a government-guaranteed gold standard." Therein lies the problem. Governments lie. They cheat. They steal. http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north924.html Gary North is an authority on economics, even by my standard; however I see a very serious error in those words above, and I'm going to explain why, from my view, those words express a very serious error. Then I want to explain my view of a problem with a "gold standard", and then I'll read the rest of the report by Gary North - and comment if inspired. Governments don't steal. People steal. Blaming anything, or any one, other than the one who steals, for stealing, is a transfer of power from affective defense against theft to that one thief who stole, by letting him, or her, get away with it - again. If anyone is less inclined to defend against theft by the thief who stole, and more inclined to defend against theft by something incapable of theft (such as a government), the power shifts by that exact measure. There may be greater shifts of power as more and more people are weakened by this type of misdirection, and as more and more thieves steal, and go unrecognized, unaccounted for, and allowed to continue stealing perpetually. The error is very serious, as it builds the curtain, it builds the false front, and it maintains the illusion covering the crimes committed by the criminals upon their clueless victims. Power that could be expended toward a non-criminal government is lessened by the false identification of "government" as a thing that steals. Government is nothing without a person operating it. If a lying, stealing, torturing, and mass murdering person operates it, what can be expected? Blame the government? That is a fools errand. Don't be fooled, it can cost you everything. On to a Gold Standard, in my own words, and then I'll read the rest of the article by the economics authority. A gold standard may result from a competition of many different forms of money whereby gold becomes the highest quality money, at the lowest cost, and all the other competitors fail at winning this competition because all other competitors are lower in quality and cost more, over time, as the competition perpetuates, and gold remains to be, despite all competition, the highest quality money, at the lowest cost; thereby establishing, and maintaining, a gold standard. That must be what Gary North is saying, and I just use my own words to introduce the rest of the article by Gary North. If Gary North doesn't say that, then what force is the force that causes a gold standard to be - in force? As soon as one person begins to accumulate large amounts of gold, during a gold standard, is the moment that gold becomes more scarce, and as someone, or some group, continues to accumulate more and more gold, will be the moment that gold scarcity increases. What happens when gold is accumulated to a point where one group owns most of it and everyone else has very little of it? Answer: The quality of gold as money shifts dramatically in this way: Part 1 Gold as money becomes a very high quality for those who have accumulated it - to them it is no longer scarce. Gold as money becomes a very low quality for those who can't get it, and therefore they will look for money they can get, and the money they can get will be higher quality because they can get it. Part 2 Gold as money becomes a very low cost to those who have it, because they accumulate it, and thereby control it, and they can then sell gold to other people, and charge other people to use gold, and the charge is called: interest. Gold as money becomes a very high cost to those who don't have it and in order to get some of it they have to pay the price, pay the interest payments, and if any other money charges less interest, they will buy the less costly money instead. Cost is a quality, quality is a cost. If the people who accumulate the gold and do so to a point whereby these people can charge interest to other people who "borrow" the gold, then a competitor (black market) will emerge. This has happened in history. As far as I know: Gary North does not claim that gold can generate interest, or produce interest, or inspire interest, and therefore I am curious about what Gary North has to say about this non-government gold standard. I'll read on. I read the rest and am happy to report that Gary North, despite the misdirection, maintains authority on economic understanding - in my opinion. The only force that would, if it could, create and maintain a gold standard is competition - not lying, thieving, torturing, and mass murdering people running a criminal government. ++++++++++++ The government would specify the form of acceptable currency for the payment of taxes -- nothing else. ++++++++++++ Hold on; that can be trouble. If the people running the government demand payment in one, and only one, form of money then that one form of money is thereby made exceptionally more valuable than any other competitor. Such an error would transfer power from the people who create wealth to the people who demand payment of taxes with that one single form of money. The demand for only that one money, by the people who run the government, create a monopoly, and destroy competition, they effectively nullify the force that forces quality higher and they effectively destroy the force that forces cost lower. Why would they do that? Why would the people running the government want to destroy the force that forces quality higher and cost lower? Why would they seize the power that forces quality higher and costs lower, and why would they then destroy that power by creating and enforcing a single money monopoly? Gary North is wrong, or ambiguous to a point of inaccuracy. If government out-laws competition, and government ( the people running it) demand only one form of money as payment of taxes, what do you think will be the result of such a demand upon the people who create wealth? Think about it - please. +++++++++++ Now, if I can just persuade the self-doubters of the legitimacy and wisdom of the free market. . . . +++++++++++ Competition may be the thing (the force) that Gary North has in mind when he types the term "free market" - I can't know unless he tells me, and I'm not on his list of correspondents. Competition is easy to understand when anyone ever has a choice between a product that is of poor quality and high price next to a product that is of high quality and low price on the same shelf. Competition forces the producer of the low quality product to a higher quality - or their product stays on the shelf while the higher quality producer continues to produce enough high quality products to fill the same shelf. Competition can also inspire the producer of the low quality stuff to a criminal act, such as the willful injury of the competition, so as to eliminate the competition. That is what criminals do, they eliminate competition, they eliminate the force that demands higher quality and lower cost. This is easy to see once a person can dig their way out of the falsehoods that bury them.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jan 4th, 2011 06:58 am |
|
238th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The OZ Warning I started watching that Award Winning Documentary and I stopped immediately. I stopped to write something as a warning to anyone who may also be inclined to watch that Award Winning Documentary. If the DOOM on the horizon is seen as inevitable by enough people it will be so. If enough people know that honest working people, the people who actually produce wealth, and therefore the people who actually raise "the standard of living", if enough of these people REALize that the DOOM is a result of a specific, not an ambiguous connecting medium between those who create wealth and the legal criminals who steal it, then all those wealth creating people can, easily, very easily, sever that connection, and avoid that specific demise. Here is the connecting medium - in score board form: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ On to the documentary - and I may return here to comment after viewing. Comment: I heard this: "You can't borrow your way out of debt" and "You can't drink yourself sober". Please know something, and this is very, very important. A person, or any number of people working cooperatively (voluntary association = free from crime), can most certainly borrow their way out of debt, and to think otherwise is very foolish. I will offer two analogies after a short explanation concerning this "half truth" propagated by that quote (above). The person propagating the half truth claims that a person can no more borrow their way out of debt than a person can drink themselves sober. That is true if a person fails to invest the borrowed stuff into actions that result in the production of more stuff; whereby the value, or the power, of the stuff created is greater than the value, or the power, of the stuff borrowed. A = stuff borrowed B = investment A < B Failing to recognize, realize, understand, and know the other half of this half truth is a very serious failure - please understand this much. Analogy 1: A group of prosperous people (voluntary association of honest productive people: free from crime) manage to survive for time span X, a number of years, or a number of centuries, never needing debt. Suddenly the weather changes and the people must work harder to gain the same standard of living because more economic power is required to deal with the severe weather - to avert famine. These people borrow themselves into debt, to have the power to adapt to the change in weather, to dig themselves out of a dust bowl. Then a nearby group of criminal people conduct an Aggressive War for Profit against the prosperous people who have borrowed themselves into their own debt, so as to dig themselves out of the dust bowl that a change in weather has caused. Do these people who are being targeted as victims by perpetrators of an Aggressive War for Profit borrow even more money from themselves so as to have the power to purchase defensive military hardware, defensive military employees who must fight the defense against the Aggressive War for Profit, or do these people give up, because they can't "borrow their way out of debt"? Analogy 2 (closer to home?) Person A borrows money because his taxi business just spent one year in the red due to a large increase in the price of gasoline. Before the large increase in the price of gasoline Person A was "making money", now Person A is "going into debt". So person A borrows money to buy a fleet of electric cars to replace the gasoline powered cars and the savings in fuel costs is 80% on day one, and the savings in fuel costs increases to 85%, or more, as gasoline prices increase. Now Person A has borrowed his way out of debt, because the monthly payments on the loan (plus interest = so long as interest isn't too far above cost = too expensive) are less than the monthly gains (investment) due to lowering the cost of powering the cars in the taxi business. What happens if the cost of electricity goes up? The analogy continues with another loan, to "borrow his, or her, way out of debt" whereby the Taxi business owner buys Solar Panels and cuts down the cost of buying electricity by 5% on day one, as soon as he, or she, begins to produce his, or her, own electricity at home, or at his Taxi Business property. And, and this is a big "and", the investment pays even more as the price of electricity, from the power company, increases - for whatever reason. There are now plenty of analogies for the reader to ponder when considering the whole truth concerning borrowing. Think, please, as to what the actual human action is, this borrowing stuff, and know that the same actions can be called credit as well as debt. Credit is the same thing as borrowing in the present time; while the future time is a process, or procession of actions, whereby the borrower earns by producing more stuff, and producing enough extra stuff to pay back the loan, and then some. A = the stuff borrowed B = investment process resulting in a measure of stuff A < B That is called an investment. If A > B, then why would someone call it an investment? Borrow stuff, work, and end up with less stuff, and then borrow more stuff, and then end up with less stuff, and then borrow more stuff, and then end up with less stuff, and do that again, and again, and again, and again, until someone, somewhere realizes, hey, this can't go on forever. Who is the stupid one? When will it be a good time to look in the mirror? KNEE JERK warning: At a point in the documentary a photo of a starving child sitting on a chair is shown and statements are made claiming that starvation can be eliminated - simply. The KNEE JERK reaction will be something alone the lines of "overpopulation" whereby the viewer has been trained, conditioned, and modified, through propaganda to think in terms of "overpopulation" such that "if you feed them" they will "reproduce" and we are all DOOMED by "Overpopulation". If you think that - go look in the mirror. If you don't think that, then you have not been subjected to enough false propaganda to cause that KNEE JERK reaction. The fact is, and this can be a very accurate accounting process, or this can be less than a very accurate accounting process, and this fact will remain a fact, even if the people doing the accounting fail to account accurately: Africa, or any continent on the planet Earth, is full of very valuable natural resources (including the indigenous native people) and thereby fully capable of becoming a highly competitive example of human prosperity within the geographical boundaries of that continent. Whomever claims otherwise, it seems to me, is someone whose accounting procedures are false, on purpose, they have cooked the books. One other point I wish to address while watching this documentary is a point concerning the legitimate (morally defensible) process of charging interest for borrowing anything, money, power, labor, anything. The legitimate reason for charging interest is such that a high risk loan, whereby the odds are that the loan will not be paid back, inspires the lender to raise the price charged to the high risk borrower, and in doing so the cost of paying for bad loans is shared by both borrower and lender. Example: Lender can loan X to either Person A or Person B. Person A offers a plan that is seen by the borrower as a sure deal, no risk, and Person A happens to be a relative of the lender, someone known, someone honest, someone who always pays back every penny borrowed. How much interest does the lender charge? Person B is an old drinking buddy, now hooked on crack, and person B shows up to borrow money for a fix. How much interest does the lender charge? This type of thinking, this legitimate charge of interest, is the same type of thinking that inspires such things as "credit scores". The idea here is that a person earns a lower interest rate, and this is very similar to someone earning a low insurance premium - but that is a story I think I can refrain from exploring at this time. Back to the documentary for me.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jan 5th, 2011 03:57 pm |
|
239th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Let the real debate begin - someday? I've got news for people. There hasn't been a debate between the proponents of Public money and Private money - one doesn't exist. The closest thing to a debate on Public versus Private money are one sided reports, like the link above, whereby a proponent of one thing voices an opinion, and sometimes a voice will pretend to know the other viewpoint. 1. Public 2. Private Anyone, please, tell me how private money can compete with public money, and if you do this, and do this accurately, reasonably, logically, and even morally, how can the subject of taxes be avoided during that expressed viewpoint? Before I finish that report above, with that opinion, I'm already detecting the absence of reason, whereby the writer avoids any mention of the connection with money and taxes. Wishing away taxes, as if taxes don't exist, and as if money isn't used to pay taxes, a legalized money, a specific money, that a tax payer must have to pay taxes, does not make taxes vanish into thin air. Taxes exist. People, real people, people with guns, will enforce the payment of taxes - and no amount of wishing will make the tax man go away. It takes a whole lot of resources, a whole lot of power, physical power from the physical world, and a whole lot of mental power from the world where thoughts exist, to manage, somehow, to avoid the payment of taxes, and therefore avoid the requirement to get legal money with which to pay those taxes. I'll read the report and comment. This is simply central planning. This writer appears to be demonizing the effort by Dennis Kucinich to fight against the criminal exploitation of innocent people by the criminals running the Federal Reserve Extortion Racket. Dennis Kucinich has a plan of attack, and the member of Congress is doing what he can do to implement that plan - true or false? So the plan, being implemented by Dennis Kucinich, is Plan A. The writer says that Plan A is "simply central planning". That is "Free Market" dogma. That means nothing. It is a dogmatic cue for the proponents of legalized capitalism to reject anything done by whomever agrees with, supports, or aids in the effort to implement Plan A - because it is "simply central planning". Plan A is being rejected because Plan A is "simply central planning". What is the alternative to "central planning"? Is the alternative "random occurrence"? I'll read on, and my guess is that this person has a Plan, which can be called Plan B, and in no way are we, the readers, to recognize the fact that Plan B is also "simply central planning". Plan B is "random occurrences"? Plan B, more than likely, is a plan to legally re-establish a Gold Standard. When dogmatists like this guy begin to use those catch phrases, like "central planning", they are building a house of cards, a Man of Straw, and a cover-up, a cloak, smoke, mirrors, a curtain, a veil, they are creating falsehood. A Free Market is one that is free from criminals, legal criminals, or non-legal criminals, what is the difference? A. Crime sanctioned and subsidized by the law power B. Crime not sanctioned and subsidized by the law power The criminals define the crimes they commit by willfully committing those crimes, not by telling their victims that what they are doing is legal, or "for their own good". Truth does not work that way. Falsehood works that way. Deceit is the tool used to make victims believe in the good of being victims. If this dogmatist, writing this report, demonizing Dennis Kucinich, get's away with this crime, then it will be despite this effort to expose such a fraud, in progress. A Free Market must have, by whatever means possible, a process by which crime is less powerful than the Free Market. Criminals do not enforce a Free Market into existence. That is a lie. A Free Market will over power crime, or crime will over power a Free Market - in each case. So, what is the source of power, where does the power come from, where this power overpowers the force of crime that does exist, and will continue to exist, so long as victims remain powerless? 1. Power produced by honest working people who do not plan on and then follow the plan to injure innocent victims 2. Power stolen from honest working people who do not plan on and then follow the plan to injure innocent victims. Where does the power to defend come from, and where does the power to steal come from? I will continue reading the report by the dogmatist who wrote this: This is simply central planning. That is dogma. Instead of money being placed in the hands of multitudes of entrepreneurs via bank loans, this bill calls for loans to be made by the government. Dennis Kucinich is not stupid. This writer appears to either be stupid or an outright liar, a fabricator of falsehoods. My guess is that Dennis Kucinich is proposing to create a nonprofit government loan fund. Do you know what that can be? People send money to a central collection of individual contributions and then that collection of money (money isn't money if it doesn't have the power to purchase) is loaned back to individual people. No interest. Non-profit. Tax amount X is loaned to person A. Loan A, by person A, is paid back into the fund in the amount of X. How is that any different from anything done by any other group of people pooling their power to purchase, and then having a plan to re-distribute those funds by some planned calculation of some kind? If the difference is such that people in case A are forced to add money to the fund and people in case B are not forced to add money into the fund then that is a legal battle over the concept of law and that is a legal battle over the concept of government being either a voluntary association or otherwise. That is a legal battle concerning the legality of enforcing tax payment. If government is a voluntary association, show me this thing. If it is not one, then there will be a fund, a collection point, a place where taxes are collected, by force, or else. Obey What happens to people who do not pay taxes? Those who have enough money, denominated in dollars, in the U.S.A. don't have to pay taxes. Who doesn't know this fact? If they don't have to pay taxes, why should anyone have to pay taxes? That is not the fight here, the fight here assumes that taxes exist and there is a tax fund from which to spend that power to purchase by some legalized method, some calculation of some kind. The fight here isn't a fight over the legitimacy of tax enforcement. The fight here, by Dennis Kucinich is a fight over who controls the tax spending, and how tax spending is done, since a tax fund does exist, and no one I have ever talked to has ever failed to understand that this existing tax fund is enforced by real people who really will enforce it. And everyone I know, really, knows that political power buys your ticket out of the tax paying membership. A. Those who actually pay taxes B. Those who do not pay taxes C. Those who receive (and spend) tax collected purchasing power. a. And do so by a legal prescribed method b. And do so at will, accountable to no one, no greater power at all. Since taxes are collected, if I have Plan A understood, and I didn't read it, then, taxes will be available to tax payers in the form of legal loans. My guess is that Dennis Kucinich does not out-law loans by any other means, using any other form of money, whatsoever, and that appears to be what this writer is suggesting. My guess is that Dennis Kucinich is acting in a manner that an elected representative of the people would do with the money that the people are required to send to a central tax fund, and thereby offering a competitive supply of available capital, in the form of money loans, legal money loans, to people by some process, and specifically not a case where Dennis Kucinich is planning on outlawing competitive loans made by any other producer and seller of loans. While I think, the writer will suggest, that Plan B is going to be some form of law that makes only Gold legal money, and thereby eliminate, by law, any competitive form of money, by that legal means. In either case, the power to eliminate competition, is the power to enforce only one money used when select people are forced to pay taxes. If there is a Plan C, where people send portions of their earnings, in the form of purchasing power money, to a fund, an insurance fund, or lottery, a company stock, or any central collection of many individual contributions of money, and this Plan C is strictly voluntary, having nothing to do with the involuntary tax fund, then such a plan can't be denominated in dollars, since dollars are connected to the U.S.A legal tax fund intimately. I'll read on.
I do not know why Dennis Kucinich would support such a thing - either. My guess is that he is desperate and the idea is to give a president enough rope to hang himself with or enough rope to actually do something productive. I don't know. Someone, or some group, who are not well known, and are not held accountable, and who have power, and the power commanded includes the power to increase and decrease the number of legal dollars, and this person, or this group of people, use that power to gain power at the expense of other people - this is a knowable fact. If everyone knows that this power to increase or decrease the number of legal dollar is a power held by a president, then people will know who to blame, or who gets the credit for, what happens when dollars are increased in numbers or when dollars are decreased in numbers. People should already be intimately familiar with the current score board on the past decisions to increase and then decrease the number of legal dollars produced by the people who have that legal power. That score board is right here: Dollar manipulation score board Who is to blame for that score? Who get's the credit for that score? Who has to pay, and pay, and pay, for that score? Who has the power to give themselves credit for that score? Do you know his name? Do you know their names? Do you know who has the legal power? Do you know which law authorizes that legal power? Does your representative know? What is the plan that your representative has for dealing with that score board? Have you read it, and does that plan have a snow balls chance in hell of moving the power you earn from the legal criminals who take it, back to you? I'll read-on. Bottom line: We have an entire set of people who believe that money printing itself creates wealth. They somehow don't get that production of goods and services is the only thing that creates wealth. They want to take power away from the way Fed as it is now structured as a fractional banking system--which should be done because the Fed does print money and thus distorts the economy in favor of the banking elite. But they don't see the money printing as part of the problem, just how it is now done. For them, printing more money is going to mean, by itself, more cars,education, healthcare and homes, as starters. I do not know enough about what the bill is to say what the bill will cause. I do now that there is a fundamental cause and effect involved in the current legal money monopoly, where a group of people called: The Fed, have the legal power to increase and then decrease the supply of legal dollars. Fundamentally such a thing will lead to lower quality money and money that cost more to the consumers or users of money, anyone other than the producers of that money. The producers of that money are no different than the producers of electricity, or the producers of water, or food, or gasoline, or anything powerful. If they have a monopoly on it, and it is something needed, then they will always have customers, they have a captive consumer base, and without competition they can, and they will, decrease the quality, and they will increase the price. The monopoly, or cartel, or cabal, of producers have no force, no power, no cause, no interest, and no desire to keep quality higher than the competition, and keep prices lower than the competition - there isn't any competition, and their interest, their power, and their force is concentrated, focused, and expended toward eliminating competition. Denis Kucinich may not be offering a much higher quality competitive plan, and the price tag may not be much lower, but as far as which plan is best, and for whom it is best, I can't say - not with any real authority. I can say that Plan A is, obviously, intending to compete, and therefore Plan A is a force that will work to force The FED people to produce a higher quality product at the lowest price, or, The FED people will eliminate Plan A, because it is a competitor.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jan 19th, 2011 10:16 am |
|
240th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Money making competition
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 06:08 pm | Page: ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
| Power Independence > Good News > Good News > It's the currency - STUPID! | Top |
