Kucinich - Good News - Good News

Home

Not logged in - Login | Register

Power Independence > Good News > Good News > Kucinich

Moderated by: Joe Kelley

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

New Topic

Printer Friendly

Kucinich

Rate Topic

Author	Post

Posted: Sat Dec 1st, 2007 10:04 am

Quote

101^st Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4kTnP5VJ1k&feature=related

Quote

Posted: Sun Dec 2nd, 2007 02:52 pm

Quote

102^nd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18818.htm

Public opinion has reached this high level even before Congress has started any impeachment investigation of the Bush-Cheney administration. The public is way ahead of Congress, suggesting that it is time for the U.S. House of Representatives to move forward with the impeachment process.

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 3rd, 2007 11:31 am

Quote

103^rd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.indypendent.org/2007/12/02/kucinich-on-hr-1955/

Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) said that he believes the proposed Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (H.R. 1955/S. 1959) is unconstitutional.

Quote

Posted: Wed Dec 5th, 2007 11:19 am

Quote

104^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://pdamerica.org/articles/news/2007-12-05-08-07-19-news.php

Not surprisingly in a field of eight contenders, no candidate came close to gaining a majority of the total vote in PDA's recently completed presidential straw poll. But two candidates--Dennis Kucinich (41%) and John Edwards (26%)--combined for more than 2/3 of the total vote. Over 15,000 PDA activists voted in the presidential straw poll. Full results here.

After Kucinich and Edwards, only one other candidate-Barak Obama (13%)-made it into double digits. All the rest were in single digits: Hillary Clinton (9%), Bill Richardson (5%), Joe Biden (3%), Chris Dodd (1%), Mike Gravel (less than 1%). In contradiction to media reporting on the primary race, PDA's results parallel those of DFA, Daily KOS, the Texas Democratic Party and others whose polls show very weak support for Clinton among the Democratic base.

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 7th, 2007 01:36 pm

Quote

105^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWupJvXSegU&blah

Quote

Posted: Sat Dec 8th, 2007 01:53 pm

Quote

106^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Penn_endorses_Kucinich_challenges_conventional_wisdom_1207.html

PIANO WIRE PUPPETEERS:

THE CONSTITUTION, MEDIA & DENNIS KUCINICH

By Sean Penn

It's been an odd week. For me, a particularly odd week. But that's another story. So, wait a minute. Iran DOESN'T have nuclear weapon capability??? So, who are we gonna bomb? I want to bomb somebody! Didn't Senator Clinton just vote in essence to give President Bush the power to bomb Iran? If he had done it last week, would that have made her right? I mean, if she knew then what she knows now? Or am I getting that backward? Golly, I'm confused. And what about President Bush? This week, Vladimir Putin, the man Mr. Bush said he "Looked into the eyes of and found to be very straightforward and trustworthy." So much so, he was "able to get a sense of his soul." Well that soulful fella has just successfully coalesced the most dangerous power base in Russia since the Cold War amid rumors that include allegations he ordered the assassinations of journalists and imprisonment of noted proponents of freedom (Oops).

Meanwhile, our President's great enemy in Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, that "totalitarian," "authoritarian," "dictator," that "mad man run amok," somehow was unsuccessful in his bid for the constitutional reforms that would have allowed him to be repeatedly re-elected for life...Hmmm? Odd week, you know? Really. What happened to Chavez's "strong-arming?" His "electoral corruption?" His alleged "gagging of the press?" How in the hell could he have lost? I'm sorry, did I miss something? How is it that this "Commie bastard" with 80% of his citizens having elected him in the first place was unable to prevail? Could it be that we've been lied to about him? I mean, Pat Robertson's not a liar, is he? His god wouldn't let that happen, would he? And god-forbid, our god would let the right-wing pundits, left-wing corporates, or our own administration send us a bill of goods!? Is it possible, I mean I know it's silly, but is it just a little bit possible that President Chavez is in fact a defender of his people's Constitution? That, that's how his referendum could fail? And that that's why he accepted it with such grace? A constitution which I have read several times. Quite a beautiful document, not dissimilar to our own. You might give it a read. Oh, I forgot -- he's a "drug runner."

Let me share something with you. Late one night in Caracas, I met with a couple of fellas, mercenaries I think you call them. Goddamit, I keep doing that. I mean "contractors." They were Brits, their specialty: drug interdiction. These two were no great fans of Chavez. They called him "radical" and expected him to fall to an assassin's bullet within the year. Like him or not, he had the cash to win their acceptance of his employ. And working alongside the Venezuelan military, these two, based in Caracas, had played the mountainous and jungled border between Columbia and Venezuela. A zone rife with paramilitaries, FARC guerillas, and mer...scratch that, contractors. What I was told that evening in Caracas by these piano wire puppeteers was that they had never worked for a government whose investment in drug interdiction was so genuine. "Yeah," said one of the Brits, "I gotta give the bastard Chavez that."

But I was talking about the Constitution. Most importantly, our own. And what an odd week it has been. Our culture is engrained with a tradition that blurs the line between what is right, what is just and what is constitutional, with what is a scam. That tradition is the cult of personality. What can TV sell, what kind of crap will we buy. And at what point are we buying and selling our rights, our pride, our flag, our children, and succumbing to meaningless slogans that are ultimately pure titles for un-Americanism. How do we know what's American and what is not? Because John Wayne tells us so? Because Sean Penn tells us so? Susan Sarandon? Bill O'Reilly? Michael Moore? Senator Bull? Or Senator Shit? Ann "my bowel expenditure" Coulter? No. It's our Constitution. We don't use it just to win. We depend on it because it's the only "us" worth being. And because it's our children's inheritance from our shared forefathers and the traditions that really do speak best of our country.

So, here's the question. We got Iowa coming up, we got New Hampshire right on its ass. Do we sell it for electability? If Hitler were the only candidate, would voting for him be most American? Jump on a plane with me. Okay, we're over the Middle East now...Let's land. Take a deep breath.

Imagine the bodies, burned and mutilated, the concussive sounds of gunfire and explosives defining the last horrifying moments of the dying and the dead. Imagine the millions of refugees fleeing through the deserts of Iraq, the babies crying, and the stench of death in the air. Yuck. Let's get back on the plane and head home.

Now, imagine American servicemen dead or broken, returning from a broken military to a silent casket or a broken veteran's administration, to broken lives and broken businesses, broken wives, unspoken husbands, and devastated children. And what for? What have we gained? Al-Qaida recruitment is up. Terrorism is up. Quality of life is down in our country and around the world. While the rich continue to get richer and the poor, poorer and more numerous. And on the verge of recession, we are witnessing the dramatic disassembling of the middle class amidst a flood of foreclosures and unpayable debts. To Osama Bin Laden's infinite delight, we have become a country of principle breakers rather than principle bearers. We are torturers and we too often, imprison only the weak. When our own administration chooses its bewilderingly un-American agenda (For the entitled people? By the entitled people?) over the Constitution in defining American values, principles, and law, Bin Laden laughs at the weakened sheep that we and our representatives have become. High crimes and misdemeanors? How about full-blown treason for the outing our own CIA operatives? How about full-blown treason for those who support this administration through media propaganda?

While I'm not a proponent of the Death Penalty, existing law provides that the likes of Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld and Rice, if found guilty, could have hoods thrown over their heads, their hands bound, facing a 12-man rifle corps executing death by firing squad. And our cowardly democratically dominated House and Senate can barely find one voice willing to propose so much as an impeachment. That one voice of a true American. That one voice of Congressman Dennis Kucinich. This is not going to be a sound bite. Not if I can help it. I'm torn. I'm torn between the conventional wisdom of what we all keep being told is electibility and the idealism that perhaps alone can live up to the challenges of our generation. Of the democrats running for President, only Congressman Dennis Kucinich's candidacy is backed by a voting record of moral courage and a history of service to our country that has fully earned our support and our gratitude. And when I say support, I am not speaking to democrats alone, but rather to every American who would take the time on behalf of their children, our planet, and our soldiers to educate themselves on the Kucinich platform.

In the recent debate among Democrats in Las Vegas, the candidates, one after the other, placed security ahead of human rights. Benjamin Franklin once said "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Then, there was good ole Patrick Henry. Remember him? "Give me liberty, or give me death." These were the real tough bastards. The real John Wayne's. These are the traditions we should be serving. I found the debate infuriating, nearly an argument for fascism with few exceptions, key among them Dennis Kucinich. Of course as a strategic politician, Mrs. Clinton pulled out her set of Ginzu knives and dominated once again on "centrist" political strategy. In fending off attacks upon she, the front runner, she reminded the audience and her fellow candidates, "We are all Democrats." Wolf Blitzer asked each candidate if they would support the other should they themselves not be the nominee. One after another, the answer, yes. One exception: Dennis Kucinich, who with the minimal time allotted him, once again rose up beyond the sound bite and put principal ahead of party; argued policy rather than politeness. He has been the dominant voice of integrity on issues of trade, labor, education, environment, health, civil liberties, and the one endlessly determined voice of peace. But is he too short? Does his haircut not appeal? Is he not loyal enough to a cowardly democratic platform? Does he not appeal to the cult of personality? And what if the answer is yes?

What if Dennis Kucinich, the most deserving and noble of candidates, the most experienced in issues of policy and the least willing to play into the politics of personal power? What if we can't elect a man simply on the basis of the best ideas, the most courage, and the most selfless service? What does it say about our country when we can't rally the voices of the common good to support a man, like our troops, who would die for us, who would die for our constitution? Who, as mayor of Cleveland at the age of 31 stood up against contracts on his life. Three separate assassins whose intent was to kill him as he stood up for his constituency there. Nonetheless, he carries on. He continues to serve. I've been a supporter of Dennis Kucinich for several years. And I've been torn lately. I've been torn by the allure of "electability." I began to invest some support in a very good man (one among Dennis's opponents) who seems to be finding himself as a constitutional defender, but he's not one yet. He is however, among those that we allow the media to distinguish as electable. But we're talking about the Constitution here. We're talking about our country. I have decided not to participate in proactive support on the basis of media distinctions. I have chosen to pledge my support to the singular, strongest and most proven representative of our constitutional mandate. Dennis Kucinich offers us a very singular opportunity as we share this minute of time on earth. We, the people. It is for us to determine what is electable. And here's how simple it is: If we, those of us who truly believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, all of us, vote for Dennis Kucinich, he will be elected. Could we call him electable then? If so, America will stand taller than ever.

Let's remind our friends in the social circles of New York and the highbrow winner-friendly and monied major cities that support Mrs. Clinton, that this is not Bill Clinton. For all the misgivings I have about our former President, he raised up friends and opposition alike, his great gift as a motivator of interest and activism, of self-education and participation was, on its own merits, a unique gift. But don't underestimate personal agendas, those that initiated NAFTA, betrayed Haitian refugees and gay rights in the military within a minute of his own election. Don't underestimate that part of him when he gives his wife the face of his talent. Don't underestimate the damage her poisonous ambition can do to this country. We can't wait for the benefit of hindsight to service the benefit of Mrs. Clinton's career. Let's raise up men and women of vision, of integrity, of belief in our principles. How exciting would that be to do? How good would that be for television? What if we turned this game around? Imagine watching on television, our country raising up a leader because he represents our Constitution. Yes, good things can be good TV. So, let's give the Constitution another read, shall we? And then decide who its greatest defender would be. I suggest that Republicans, Independents, and Democrats alike will find that they know what's really right in their hearts and minds.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18851.htm

Last edited on Sat Dec 8th, 2007 01:55 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 10th, 2007 10:59 am

Quote

107^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bXkxNXW0Uk

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 10th, 2007 11:32 am

Quote

108^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2007/12/supporters-of-evil.html

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

"The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Congressional leaders from both parties would later seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration's counterterrorism effort. The CIA last week admitted that videotape of an interrogation of one of the waterboarded detainees was destroyed in 2005 against the advice of Justice Department and White House officials, provoking allegations that its actions were illegal and the destruction was a coverup.

Yet long before "waterboarding" entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

Individual lawmakers' recollections of the early briefings varied dramatically, but officials present during the meetings described the reaction as mostly quiet acquiescence, if not outright support. "Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing," said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement."

http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2007/02/ha-ha-funny-torture-jokes.html

The Center for American Progress has just launched an advertising campaign called "Torture is not US." The hard truth is that for at least five decades it has been. But it doesn't have to be.

NOTE: Arthur Sibler also wrote:

The leading Democratic presidential contenders have said they reject torture as an official instrument of government policy. In the context of the actions of the Democratic Congress, such claims are contemptibly meaningless:

By 'excluding' the public from 'news' about Dennis Kucinich's IMPEACHMENT proceedings, by 'blocking' the flow of information about THAT FACT, what is Aurthur Sibler guilty of promoting?

By 'excluding' the public from 'news' about Dennis Kucinich's IMPEACHMENT proceedings, by 'blocking' the flow of information about THAT FACT, what is Aurthur Sibler guilty of promoting?

This is a very important question.

Why ‘play politics’ when the end of the human species is at stake? If a person or a group of people are suspected (actually confess) of torture and mass murder, then, is it ‘RIGHT’ to discredit (by ignoring it) the exercise of POWER aimed toward accurately accounting for the actual people ordering and managing the torture and mass murder?

This is my same question to any ‘republican’ (Ron Paul for example) who has FAILED to support the POWER TO IMPEACH:

TORTURING MASS MURDERERS

Edit to add:

WHILE THEY ARE TORTURNING AND MASS MURDERING

OK, soooooo, if you were on the rack and if YOU were watching as all your loved ones were being murdered slowly, then, would you SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT?

?

Last edited on Mon Dec 10th, 2007 11:46 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 10th, 2007 03:02 pm

Quote

109^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071207/OPINION02/712070321/1022/OPINION02

December 7, 2007

I think Bush and Cheney should be impeached. Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich has a new strategy for this to happen. If just one state House and Senate pass together a Resolution for Impeachment, the U.S. Congress will be forced to set aside all other business and deal with impeachment. This is according to the Thomas Jefferson Manual on Impeachment. I think Vermont is the best place for this to happen, but Vermonters need to speak out.

Isaiah Back
https://gooddeedseats.com/bobdylan/songs/times.php
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall

Quote

Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2007 02:03 pm

Quote

110^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

(I have always supported Dennis Kucinich, whenever possible but after the 2004 Convention and his failure to stand up at the Convention against the war and support the peace activists who were hauled off the convention floor, with their anti-war signs, and given his inability to run a strong campaign, I can no longer back him. I do respect his positions on many issues.)
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/volatile1.html

How about gaining more information on that event?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=2004+convention+Dennis+Kucinich+anti-war+police

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0714-12.htm

Published on Wednesday, July 14, 2004 by DemocracyNow!

Did Dennis Kucinich Sell Out Anti-War Democrats?

by Amy Goodman

Is that relevant?

How about a change on the search:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=2004+convention+Dennis+Kucinich+anti-war+riot

I took out 'police' and added 'riot'.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0724-01.htm

Some people fear that antiwar protesters will blow it and undermine the "Dump Bush" effort, which they view as the overwhelming priority. Others are angry that a powerful liberal advocacy group, MoveOn.org, is playing an active supporting role for the Kerry campaign. To them, "giving the Democrats a pass" means not staging convention protests despite the fact that Kerry and many other Democratic lawmakers voted in favor of the resolution for the war in Iraq and helped to overwhelmingly pass the Patriot Act after the Sept. 11 attacks. There is talk that "progressive" delegates will stage a surprise antiwar action on the convention.

http://www.socialistworker.org/2004-2/508/508_04_DNC.shtml

NO MATTER how unlikely his chances, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) refused to the very end to abandon his liberal campaign for the Democratic Party presidential nomination. Even after John Kerry had the nomination locked up, Kucinich kept running--"to give people an opportunity to voice their concerns," he said.

As Kucinich told an audience during a panel discussion on the antiwar movement at the Boston Social Forum last month, "I ran for president as a Democrat to bring these principles into the party." Fine words. Only when he said them, Kucinich had abandoned his campaign and endorsed Kerry--and given up on any attempt to get a call for a definite withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq into the party platform. Following the time-honored tradition of liberal Democrats who fail to win the party’s presidential nomination, Kucinich fell in line behind the more conservative nominee.

He even had the gall to attack independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader. "It’s entirely consistent for Democrats to choose someone who they feel has the best chance of defeating George Bush and, simultaneously at the grassroots, support the principles that my campaign was about," Kucinich explained. But it’s not consistent at all.

Kucinich proved that when he gave up on the fight he promised to make to get a set date for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq written into the Democrats’ platform. Under pressure from Kerry’s operatives, Kucinich told his supporters on the platform committee to back down. Outrageously, the plank adopted by the committee says that "people of good will disagree about whether America should have gone to war in Iraq."

See this?

Why are the "NEWS" people hired by Corporate Television (Mass Media) asking Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich if they will support their 'party' 'when' they fail to gain the 'party' nomination?

What is the fetish concerning this angle?

It is based upon this:

http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/

Here:

For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least.

And here, again, is the failure to invent the better of two best goods. The POWER of falsehood hides good things - on purpose.

That POWER is criminal by nature, by definition, by action, and deed.

We do not have to become that which we despise, abhor, and cannot stand or tolerate morally, economically, and logically.

We can return civility to civilization and this is as simple as flipping on a light switch in a dark room once the POWER is ours to command. This is as simple as day is simply not night.

Quote

Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2007 01:54 pm

Quote

111^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhardt/engelhardt307.html

Here's Gorman's money passage, just dropped into the middle of the piece without further explanation or discussion: "One former official said interrogators' faces were visible on at least one video, as were those of more senior officers who happened to be visiting." Happened? Visiting? Keep in mind that we're talking about CIA officials in a torture chamber, not tourists at a local landmark.

When torturing mass murderers ARE torturing and mass murdering, then, people are being tortured and murdered.

What is the problem?

It must be falsehood.

There is no other explanation. The emperor is torturing and mass murdering. I, you, we are next on the list.

The falsehood can be expressed simply as:

Pay or Suffer

The falsehood suggests that there are only two choices when if fact the falsehood removes choice.

Pay and Suffer

or

Punishment

That is the view from a current victim of falsehood. If the potential victim recognizes the falsehood, then, the potential victim can choose from another set of choices such as:

Either you are with us; or you are a terrorist.

or

Torture or be tortured and murder or be murdered.

There is liberty.

Liberty is when a person finds the better of two goods.

Falsehood imposes the least of two evils; assuming that the intent is good.

Falsehood generates the most effective evil - on purpose.

Quote

Posted: Sat Dec 15th, 2007 11:29 am

Quote

112^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18888.htm

Three senior members of the House Judiciary Committee have called for the immediate opening of impeachment hearings for Vice President Richard Cheney.

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 21st, 2007 01:36 pm

Quote

113^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/20/wexler-impeachment/

Wexler said he has been “astonished” by the outpouring of support — over 100,000 have signed up in five days. He said he plans to write a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) in early January, asking him to begin start impeachment hearings.

“This is not the lunatic fringe — this is mainstream America,” Wexler said. These are “people that believe in the very patriotic vision, and they’re all very upset about what they see as the abuse of power by this administration and the failure of Congress to hold them accountable.”

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 28th, 2007 12:24 pm

Quote

114^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20071227_Impeach_Cheney_now.html?referrer=digg

Some people argue that the Judiciary Committee cannot proceed with impeachment hearings because it would distract Congress from passing important legislative initiatives. We disagree.

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 28th, 2007 12:29 pm

Quote

115^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20071226/pl_usnw/kucinich__comes_closest_to_embodying_the_ideals__of_the_nation

Kucinich 'Comes Closest to Embodying the Ideals' of The Nation

Edit: No mention of Mike Gravel? Why exclude Mike Gravel?

Hint: When the term 'leading candidates' is evoked, then, think 'torturing mass murderer' and 'war profits'. It may make more sense. This is going to be an interesting election as time goes by and the 'leading' candidates face up to their honest interests.

Last edited on Fri Dec 28th, 2007 12:32 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 28th, 2007 12:36 pm

Quote

116^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/29589

Cheney Impeachment - Mainstream Media Wakes Up

I don't like the title as the word use suggests that Mainstream Media was asleep. It is impossible to not know something known. It is possible to ignore on purpose. It can be very profitable to falsify on purpose - at the expense of the dupes.

http://www.wexlerwantshearings.com/

148715
signed up
and counting...

Note: Suppose the whole cabal of neo-cons are found guilty of torture, mass murder, and lesser crimes and suppose they are all sent to Iran to escape the American prison system of injustice. Would they recieve justice by an impartial judge?

How about Iraq; it is only one letter difference?

Last edited on Fri Dec 28th, 2007 12:43 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Sat Dec 29th, 2007 09:12 am

Quote

117^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

Of the more than 80,000 votes cast for Democratic candidates at [url=http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/usnw/pl_usnw/storytext/_long_shot__kucinich_buries_democratic_rivals_in_nationwide_poll_among_independent_voters/25641647/SIG=113acuqo0/*http://www.independentprimary.com]http://www.independentprimary.com[/url] by self-described independent voters, the Ohio Congressman received 61,477, burying second place finisher, former Senator John Edwards, who received only 7,614 votes, or 9.5 percent.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20071221/pl_usnw/_long_shot__kucinich_buries_democratic_rivals_in_nationwide_poll_among_independent_voters

Quote

Posted: Sat Dec 29th, 2007 08:21 pm

Quote

118^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

A group in Brattleboro is petitioning to put an item on a town meeting agenda in March that would make Bush and Vice President Cheney subject to arrest and indictment if they visit the southeastern Vermont community.

"This petition is as radical as the Declaration of Independence, and it draws on that tradition in claiming a universal jurisdiction when governments fail to do what they're supposed to do," said Kurt Daims, 54, a retired machinist leading the drive.

As president, Bush has visited every state except Vermont.

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f8f8f8"http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071228/ap_on_re_us/banning_bush_1

Quote

Posted: Thu Jan 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm

Quote

119^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.salem-news.com/printview.php?id=6932

A House Resolution to impeach U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney, Dennis Kucinich's H.R. 799, is gathering more support. The national impeachment continues to grow and generate increasing interest since being referred to the House Judiciary Committee last month, a Kucinich spokesperson said.

Quote

Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2008 10:37 am

Quote

120^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18991.htm

ALLAN NAIRN: Well, fundamentally, there’s no difference on the basic principle of, are you against the killing of civilians and are you willing to enforce the murder laws. If we were willing to enforce the murder laws, the headquarters of each of these candidates could be raided, and various advisers and many candidates could be hauled away by the cops, because they have backed various actions that, under established principles like the Nuremberg Principles, like the principles set up in the Rwanda tribunals, the Bosnia tribunals, things that are unacceptable, like aggressive war, like the killing of civilians for political purposes. So, in a basic sense, there is no choice.

I mean, Kucinich, who has good positions on many of these issues, he’s decided to throw in his lot with Obama.

?

Last edited on Fri Jan 4th, 2008 10:54 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Current time is 02:20 pm	Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Power Independence > Good News > Good News > Kucinich	Top