Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Ron Paul  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Wed May 9th, 2007 05:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://forums.newspeakdictionary.com/viewtopic.php?t=2706&sid=406217068797aef20fcbcd4f787b167e

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu May 10th, 2007 10:47 am
  PM Quote Reply
22nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods67.html

Since that post was written, ABC has begun blocking all comments about Ron Paul.

The same media establishment that bought the Iraq propaganda package and then claimed to be oh-so-sorry is now trying to keep out of the limelight the one presidential contender who has actually bucked the establishment and does something other than parrot government/media slogans. But that’s what the mainstream media’s purpose is: to define the nature of our political debate and make sure no fundamental questions are ever raised.


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat May 12th, 2007 04:35 pm
  PM Quote Reply
23rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/jr/jr-ronpaul.html

That is published on May 11.

What is the definition of irony?

Above is an article exposing how wrong it is to discredit Ron Paul as a potential holder of the office of president?

Why, then, does the article IGNORE Kucinich?

I'm asking.

Kucinich is actively, legally, trying to end the reign of terror perpetrated by the current regime. Ron Paul does, or does not, support impeachment? This is a constitutional issue. This is the rule of law applied against people who are, without any doubt whatsoever, guilty of mass murder and self-admitted TORTURE.

What is more criminal than mass murder and torture?

Must someone be caught in the process of exterminating the human species to become a criminal in the eyes of these people?

What is the definition of irony?


 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat May 12th, 2007 04:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
24th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17684.htm

In the meantime, though, Democrats need to step up to their responsibility.

 

What?

Is ignorance a choice?

The stated reason for impeaching Dick instead of George, in the document starting the impeachment, BY A PERSON IN CONGRESS, is to end the crimes sooner.

Does Ron Paul support impeachment or not?

I want to know.

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat May 12th, 2007 05:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
25th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ron+paul+on+impeachment

Results 1 - 10 of about 708,000 for Ron paul on impeachment.

 

http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=606

March 12 2007

Do you support impeachment of George W. Bush

Ron Paul:

"No I don't, at this time, support impeachment but..."

My question:

How can the current terrorist criminals be stopped soonest?

Please consider this:

http://kucinich.house.gov/SpotlightIssues/documents.htm

Imagine that you are a member of congress.

http://kucinich.house.gov/UploadedFiles/int4.pdf

Who can stop the mass murder and torture?

The Constitution places the responsibility and authority to determine weather to impeach and to draft articles of impeachment in the hands of the House of Representatives.

http://kucinich.house.gov/UploadedFiles/int3.pdf

Resolution

 

Impeaching Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-333

This bill is in the first stage of the legislative process where the bill is considered in committee and may undergo significant changes in markup sessions. The bill has been referred to the following committees:

My question is: Why spend one minute doing something other than trying to stop the mass murder and torture?

I think like this:

If you are in the position to be able to stop it, then, the person's being tortured and killed depend upon you to stop the torturers from torturing and the killers from killing.

This is beyond the question of military force. This is beyond military orders that are followed by soldiers in battle.

This is an understanding concerning who has the power to end torture and mass murder.

Who has the power to end torture and mass murder?

What does impeaching Vice President Dick do?

How quickly can this be done?

Who is standing in the way?

How about some inspirational music just in case your not yet inspired to help end the torture and the mass murder?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJK6ApCcKPo

No not that:

This:

http://www.bobdylan.com/songs/times.html

Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.


You don't see the torture?

You don't see the murder?

You are not looking. That is OK?

Who can stop it?
 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun May 13th, 2007 09:48 am
  PM Quote Reply
26th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/012949.html

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed May 16th, 2007 12:47 pm
  PM Quote Reply
27th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul386.html

I was opposed to the creation of a new Homeland Security Department from the beginning. Only in Washington would anyone call the creation of an additional layer of bureaucracy on top of already bloated bureaucracies “streamlining.” Only in Washington would anyone believe that a bigger, more centralized federal government means more efficiency.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu May 17th, 2007 03:57 pm
  PM Quote Reply
28th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy4Eugc0Xls&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdailypaul%2Ecom%2Fnode%2F147

Why not talk about that?


http://www.ccmep.org/us_bombing_watch.html

After the bombing of Iraq, danger grows of a US ground assault

By Barry Grey

World Socialist Website

December 30, 1998



 

 

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,845725,00.html

As for the first question: Why are we fighting and opposing you? The answer is very simple:
(1) Because you attacked us and continue to attack us.

 

Last edited on Thu May 17th, 2007 04:09 pm by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri May 18th, 2007 05:39 pm
  PM Quote Reply
29th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/18/martin/index.html

Martin: Paul's 9/11 explanation deserves to be debated

POSTED: 3:41 p.m. EDT, May 18, 2007

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri May 18th, 2007 05:39 pm
  PM Quote Reply
30th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17736.htm






But who was right – Rudy or Ron?

By Patrick J. Buchanan:


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri May 18th, 2007 06:32 pm
  PM Quote Reply
31st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/013064.html

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed May 23rd, 2007 04:42 pm
  PM Quote Reply
32nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17753.htm

Even now after five years of a disastrous policy, Republicans cannot accept the facts about the US invasion and failed occupation of Iraq. At the recent “debate” between Republican presidential candidates in South Carolina, US Representative Ron Paul dared to tell the truth. Rep. Paul said that our difficulties in the Middle East are “blowback” from our government’s determined attempts to exercise hegemony over the Middle East.

The Democratic Party is complicit in the Republican Party’s crimes, but unlike the Republican electorate, the Democratic electorate does not support the occupation, the domestic police state measures, and the Bush administration’s decision to send more combat troops to Iraq. Although none of the current frontrunners for the Democratic presidential nomination are independent of the special interests that benefit from the war, it might still be possible for a Democrat to emerge who will represent the Democratic electorate instead of the special interests.

 

What?

Which planet am I on?

Can Kucinich be invisible?

Can someone actually choose to be ignorant?

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/kucinich_impeach_cheney

Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich has filed articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney, citing the “very real” possibility that the U.S. would wage war with Iran and accusing Cheney of “fabricat[ing] intelligence on weapons of mass destruction to justify the Iraq war,” according to the Los Angeles Times.

Ron Paul is NOT FOR IMPEACHMENT.

That is in Ron Paul's own published words.

Dennis Kucinich has ALREADY filed articles of impeachment choosing to go after Cheney first rather than having to impeach Cheney second. The trial of Cheney will certainly ruin Bush.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Kucinich_video_asks_if_its_time_0319.html

Last Thursday, as RAW STORY reported, Kucinich declared during a speech on the House floor that "impeachment may well be the only remedy which remains to stop a war of aggression against Iran." The 2004 presidential candidate, who is running again in 2008, told RAW STORY that his House floor statement "speaks for itself."

It may be too late to go after Cheney?

Meanwhile Ron Paul is sitting this one out!?

It is NOT UP TO CONGRESS it is the responsibility of the MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

 

 

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu May 24th, 2007 04:04 pm
  PM Quote Reply
33rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul388.html

Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu May 24th, 2007 04:08 pm
  PM Quote Reply
34th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hornberger/hornberger129.html

Why the attempts to suppress, distort, and misrepresent? What are they so scared of?

 

Civil liberties that were suspended could be restored. A sense of balance and harmony could return to our lives.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri May 25th, 2007 10:19 am
  PM Quote Reply
35th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
And while his campaign staff finds imaginative ways to measure his momentum - one recent release reported that Paul had become "the third most-mentioned person in the blogosphere, beating out Paris Hilton" - more conventional measures show him way back in the pack.
 

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-oppin245227239may24,0,6192639.column?coll=ny-news-columnists

Convention can't stop revolution.

http://www.exterminatingangel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=203&Itemid=118

Growth is bottom up, not top down, so capitalism is at its most vibrant when wealth is most evenly distributed. The problem with treating the economy like a game of Monopoly is that when one person controls everything, the game is over and you start again. In real life this stage is called revolution.

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri May 25th, 2007 10:30 am
  PM Quote Reply
36th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17764.htm

Since printing paper money is nothing short of counterfeiting, the issuer of the international currency must always be the country with the military might to guarantee control over the system.

 

Attacking Ron Paul is, at least, time in the sunlight.

Why is Kucinich not even in the sunlight (Ron Paul's)?

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun May 27th, 2007 01:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
37th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=42148

Could Ron Paul Win in New Hampshire?
Friday, May 25, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun May 27th, 2007 01:43 pm
  PM Quote Reply
38th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/

When I clicked on the Poll the results was 93% for Ron Paul.

10:40 AM May 27 2007

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 1st, 2007 05:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
39th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/14952564/giuliani_worse_than_bush/2

Rudy's attack against Ron Paul in the debate was a classic example of that kind of politics, a Rovian masterstroke. The wizened Paul, a grandfather seventeen times over who is running for the Republican nomination at least 100 years too late, was making a simple isolationist argument, suggesting that our lengthy involvement in Middle Eastern affairs -- in particular our bombing of Iraq in the 1990s -- was part of the terrorists' rationale in attacking us.

Though a controversial statement for a Republican politician to make, it was hardly refutable from a factual standpoint -- after all, Osama bin Laden himself cited America's treatment of Iraq in his 1996 declaration of war. Giuliani surely knew this, but he jumped all over Paul anyway, demanding that Paul take his comment back. "I don't think I've ever heard that before," he hissed, "and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11th."

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 04:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
40th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.infowars.net/front.html

Ron Paul:

"high stakes"

 
"The Chinese can bring us to our knees..."



 


 


Last edited on Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 04:49 pm by Joe Kelley

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 01:01 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Power Independence > Good News > Good News > Ron Paul Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems