| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Capitalism/Communism | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Thu May 18th, 2006 04:10 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lora/m.lora22.html Linux Is Capitalist! by Manuel Lora and Juan Ramón Rallo Law first: Setting aside the Law of God as demanded by common sense i.e. God is or is not determined only by the individual or God. The supreme Law is time and so long as human beings continue to be - so long will time dictate our existence. Time is current or it is not time. This knowledge is paramount to all that follows, not only from my perspective, but inevitably, irrefutably, and absolutely from all human perspectives from now until the end of time. Proceeding, in thought, or action, from a base of knowledge that does not include the absolute recognition of the supreme law of time will falsify the endeavor in direct proportion as to the effect of that failure as time goes by. Is it time to have fun or is it time to get down to business? Nature dictates economy as if nature were, in fact, a brutal careless entity, or God, that has no apparent conscience. The hapless law breaker will be punished or, if the law breaker is clever, lucky, and by any means more powerful, then, the law breaker can pass on the costs of his or her error onto another, hapless less powerful person, who happens to be another hapless law breaker. The victim beaks another law: A person must know all economic costs including costs as yet to be suffered, if, a person will avoid those costs. Breaking that law will result in a person assuming the costs of his or her error. When no one breaks the law of economy, then, all human effort reaches a condition that remains hidden from common perception. That condition is called equity. Look it up. Can't be bothered with trivial nonsense while one is busy passing on costs? Here: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Equity eq·ui·ty ( P ) Pronunciation Key ( k w -t ) n. pl. eq·ui·ties
Here is a source that defines both Capitalism and Communism as a function of deed rather than word (one must be able to read words in an economical manner i.e. discriminate the real meaning intended by words accurately): http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ Note the subversion of meaning, the watering down, the disguising, the falsifying, and the obvious change in common meaning for the word Equity. One must hide a 'profit' making venture when one intends to take from another that which one does not earn and that practice is certainly NOT equitable. The victim beaks another law: Confidence in one's ability to gain at another person's expense may be a false confidence provided by a criminal fraud utilizing false language. Keep in mind, reader, that one can be one's own worst enemy. Equity removes conflict. It isn't easy, for sure, especially when one can't even define the word. Last edited on Thu May 18th, 2006 04:16 pm by Joe Kelley |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 18th, 2006 04:14 pm |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Challenge sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 Manuel Lora, I read this: http://www.lewrockwell.com/lora/m.lora22.html Thanks My comments are here: http://www.power-independence.com/view_topic.php?id=68&forum_id=3 Consider me as a check on your confidence. Please consider passing on my challenge to your partner. Joe Kelley
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 12:59 pm | |
| Power Independence > Fight Night > Debate > Capitalism/Communism | Top |
