| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Pot Black | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2006 09:39 am |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo114.html The above is more of the same bait and switch transference or projection bullshit coming from the capitalist Gold Bugs. Bait: Communist Dictators Switch: Socialism Those bad, bad, bad guys with their mass murdering are those guys, these guys, and these guys too. They are all bad and all those guys are what - exactly? They are all socialists, they are all bad and “they” are all socialists. Under one shell: Bad guys Move the shells around and pick one, any one, and pull up the shell to find – what? A socialist Round and round we go with a whole new set of bad guys and pick one again. What is found? Another socialist Hmmmmm; I get it now – socialism is bad. And what is good? Anything that isn’t socialism is good, and, the exact opposite is really, real, good indeed. Let me guess: Capitalism. How has mankind managed to prosper throughout history? Take any time and any place and put those times, dates, and places back into the shell game. Around and around we go, bait, switch, swirl, puree, stop, and pick: Capitalism Yup, that is it, capitalism is the stuff that makes the world go round – in a good way. Not socialism. Socialism bad Capitalism good Try that again and grunt a happy grunt for capitalism. Socialism bad Capitalism good Grunt Now try that again with a sad grunt followed by a happy grunt Socialism bad Grunt Capitalism good Grunt There, there, isn’t that nice – a well trained monkey. Here is a socialist: http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com/2006/04/science-of-society-no_10.html The name is Stephen Pearl Andrews. That guy was run out of a few towns during his days fighting against slavery before the Civil War (not so civil). The term socialism, at that time, meant The Science of Society, and at that time the term “Economics” was not currently a Science of Society. Now “Economics” is a Science of Society. One would have to read Stephen Pearl Andrews to see how science is applied to society and how that science is indistinguishable from economics. People cease to exist when science is not economically applied to the rigors of life. Here is another person that could be considered a Socialist: http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/warren/truecivtoc.html The name is Josiah Warren. The link documents the application of science to society leading up to the time of the writing of the words in that link. The time was 1863 and the place was Boston, Mass. That ‘socialist’ published ‘terrorist’ literature during the Civil War (not very civil at all) risking supreme censorship i.e. Arrest without warrant, held without indictment or trial, and murdered for crimes extracted during torture. So there are two of those BAD, BAD, bad Socialists and, to be fair, I think it is a good idea to point out a few of the really, real, good capitalists: http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/index.html Those good capitalists invested in all kinds of good, good, free market investment opportunities in Russia just before Russia invaded Poland which, incidentally, started WWII, at least, got everyone who was anyone involved. Good capitalists are fair minded: http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html More good capitalists investing in all kinds of good, good, free market investment opportunities in Germany just before Germany invaded Poland, incidentally, at the same time Russia invaded Poland. The “Allies” promised to give Poland back to Poland ASAP. The promises were empty. Two examples of Socialists in action compared to two examples of capitalism in action and my words here can be compared to the words written by the Gold Bug linked above. How do I know he is a gold bug? I don’t. Ask him yourself. Gold bugs don’t respond to my inquiries. They dictate or are silent. Example: http://www.power-independence.com/view_topic.php?id=71&forum_id=3 I ask and get answers. The answers I get are more often than not answers to the questions asked, followed by, dictates. Look here: Look there: Do this: Do that: The total sum of all the opinions held by human beings from day one until this moment in time and space can be averaged theoretically. Example: If every human being living did, in fact, provide one answer to one question during their life, then, what is that question and what would the most common answer to that question be – most likely? How can a human being survive? 1. Work at it. 2. Get help 3. Take from others that which is needed Gold helps accomplish something. Take your pick.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 09:08 am | |
| Power Independence > Fight Night > Debate > Pot Black | Top |
