| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Joe Kelley | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Oct 1st, 2013 12:51 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Joe Kelley 760-447-7139 josf.kelley@power-independence.com I do not want to think in terms of joining or volunteering to be a member of The National Liberty Alliance. I am naturally born to align my efforts to defend Liberty with those who are on that same path driven by that same natural born need to interpose ourselves in between the criminals and their victims, especially when it is the people who are hired as specialists to defend Liberty being the people perpetrating crimes. There is an English word used to identify employees hired to defend Liberty whereby those employees perpetrate crimes upon innocent people instead of doing the job they are hired to perform effectively. That word is Malfeasance. There may be a better word, perhaps a Latin word, perhaps a Celtic word. Malfeasance mal fe zens Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official. How can someone claim to be ignorant of their actions when they have already declared an oath to NOT act in a specific manner? The concept of willful criminal actions done by criminals, known as a guilty mind, or mens rea, is an important distinction concerning guilt or innocence. An insane person, being in such a state of mind as to be no different than a beast, a wild animal, cannot be guilty of willful intent to injure, by reason, an innocent person. It is unreasonable to conclude an insane person to be guilty of willful crime, for the same reason as it is unreasonable to conclude that a mad dog is guilty of a willful crime. Do insane people honestly, honorably, and willfully declare an oath to be a promise of behavior that will not be criminal, specifically not criminal, and if insane people are capable of doing so, then the meaning of the word insane is misunderstood in this context. An oath made by a human being, honestly, honorably, willfully, stating, in fact, that the human being is bound by his word to NOT BE A CRIMINAL, to not use the POWER commanded by the oath bearer to willfully injure innocent people, is a confession of reason, of the power of reason, and therefore the claim of being insane, or misled, or somehow failing to realize the guilt of mind during the willful injury of innocent people is at least less reasonable compared to someone who never offers an oath to specifically avoid being a criminal. Consider: High paid liars Burn them alive to save them Criminal Malfeasance IS accurately measurable Take an oath to NOT BE A CRIMINAL and then be one? The idea is to remove the criminals from the office that affords the criminals the POWER to be very POWERFUL criminals. As John Darash repeats, often enough, we are not on a witch hunt. I take that as meaning, and agreeing, that we are not intending to become criminals ourselves, we are seeking specific remedy. Stop paying the criminals in office so much money, for example, and they may not want to be criminals because the pay rate, per crime, is no longer so high. At least. At least stop paying them so well. At last remove their license to torture and murder at will, for their exclusive fun, and for their exclusive profit; however they measure fun, and however they measure profit, at least, stop giving them so much money for doing such a good job torturing and murdering so many innocent people. At least hold them to an accurate accounting of their crimes, and at least make that accurate account of their crimes PUBLIC NOTICE.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 09:49 am | |
| Power Independence > National Liberty Alliance > California > Joe Kelley | Top |
