Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in candidate for president of America 2012 |
Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in candidate for president of America 2012 |
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I run a campaign based upon the clear understanding that it is wrong to torture and mass murder for profit. Don't torture and mass murder for profit - and don't send tax money to people who do - please. I also solve the problem of sending tax dollars to torturing mass murderers and, at the same time, fix the economy with 2 products offered to anyone on the planet earth once I am in office and once I am in a position to employ political power toward that goal. Product number 1 is a no interest home and business mortgage loan offered to anyone who already has a high credit rating. Product number 2 is a 1 percent interest loan for people with high credit ratings whereby the loan money borrowed is used exclusively for the purchase of power producing or power saving products such as Solar Panels, Electric Cars, and Modular Vertical Farming Units, as only 3 examples that can illustrate the dynamics of both product 1 and 2. The republic of American can be financed exclusively by the 1 percent interest price charged to consumers of product 2 and no other "national interest" is required, including the maintenance of a republic military apparatus. In other words the work of defense will either be pared down to that which can be purchased with the surplus earned by saving republic (not national) government expenses, the cost of paying the president, the senate, the house of representatives, etc., and what is left over is budgeted toward defense, and additional defensive power is handed back to the independent separate states within the republic known as America. As president I can, but won't, ignore the constitution (all presidents since Washington have ignored the constitution when ignoring it is in their own best interest, or in the best interest of their constituents, their financiers if you prefer) and once returning to the constitution I can work toward the plan by which political economy can be restored in a moral and economic sense of restoration - by using products 1 and 2. No More Legal Criminals vote for me or The Monkey Business Cycles Perpetually The ball is back in your court |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
VP Choice still |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Interest based?I will diverge here a bit to criticize the Libertarian Party, self-proclaimed party of principle. A significant minority of libertarians, including some influential and popular politicians within the party, happen to be pro-war. They praise the state for martialing soldiers and building bombs to kill people in other states, for some state-defined rationale that is consistent only in its variability over time. Of course, supporting state wars – especially given what we now know about the ways states go to war and justify those wars throughout history – is inconsistent with freedom. The state’s language gives us a clue, because it generally puts forth that the state is always fighting FOR freedom, rather than extinguishing it (which is what a war-time state does both at home and abroad). I believe the state abuses the language this way because human beings were designed to exercise and intuitively love real liberty. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, I did something in 1996. I had help. I am on that path again. In 1996 I ran for congress. The Libertarian Party helped then. I just sent a Web Based form of currency to The Libertarian Party asking for help in my effort to run for President. People may tend to laugh at this point, and seriously that knee jerk reaction measures something important. People may scoff, and that too measures something. Here is a link: [url]http://www.lp.org/run-for-office[/url] My effort as a legal representative will be to produce 2 legal products that I can describe in great detail to anyone with a brain, anyone with a will, anyone in command of reason, and anyone who still holds dear their moral conscience. If you, or anyone, ever wondered what could be done, if something would be done, to turn this up-side-down world right-side-up, then you have probably heard a few possible plans of attack, a few possible solutions, and you probably have a few ideas working yourself. All the ideas, that everyone has, are competitive, and as all those ideas compete, the lower quality ones are set aside, the higher cost ones are set aside, and as the rubber meets the road, the number of ideas pare down to the few and then the fewer that actually have the power that accomplishes the job. If no one cares to even look into any of the workable solutions, what happens? Here is your chance to look into one competitive solution. I don't care who solves the problem, the problem I call legal crime, where the worst of the worst human garbage gain control of the law enforcement power, and they then set about, and accomplish, the goal of eliminating all competition. What I do care about is the innocent victims who are powerless to defend themselves from those legal criminals who get their power from the innocent victims. How can the innocent victims gain power, and gain enough power to be able to exert that power, effectively, in the work of defending, completely avoiding, injury by those legal criminals? If you have no answer yet, then now you can have one, if you want one to work with, and if you prefer to remain powerless, by the measure of having no answer to that question, then so be it. If you know the question, but refuse to even entertain an answer, then my suggestion is for you to get right in front of a mirror, look at yourself, and know the problem, you are looking at it. What I will be doing on this path is, in physical terms, transferring data from person to person, and that is called, in physical terms, currency. These symbols of text flowing onto this network is, in physical terms, a form of currency. What form of currency, anywhere on the planet, in physical terms, is the most powerful currency, at the lowest cost? Truth? How do you know what the truth is; do you require an official rubber stamp on it? Use your own brain, please. On this path I place before you, or anyone, a form of currency, for you to judge, for yourself, and for you to use your capacity to judge, to ask a few important questions, and answer those questions for yourself. You may then find answers that can solve problems, or you may then find cause to retreat into a state of apathy and ignorance - I can't know. I can offer: Product 1 Product 2 Product 1 and Product 2 are competitors in the legal monetary currency market to be offered to any potential consumer of legal monetary products and these 2 products intend to force The Federal Reserve products out of business, or force their products to become higher quality products at a lower cost, it matters not who produces the best legal monetary products, at the lowest cost, once competition is once again lawful in legal monetary markets. What matters is the flow of power, and the intention of Product 1 and Product 2 is to cut the legal criminals credit card, revoke their license to extort, and do so by providing a much more powerful currency, and a much lower cost to the consumer - resulting in no more power flowing from those who create power to those who steal it, and make that reversal irreversible. Once competition is once again legal, the legal criminals will no longer be able to turn the tables again, unless the power producers forget the hard won lesson again. Product 1 and Product 2 are at the idea stage of production, but even at that state they are, in fact, forms of currency. Ideas are forms of currency. Intellectual property rights are enforced for reasons, not for somebodies sense of entertainment, not for random non-reasons. An idea is a form of currency, some ideas are more powerful than others, just like gold, per ounce, is more powerful that Silver, per ounce, as those forms of currency compete as forms of currency; when expressly not against the law, and even then they compete as "Black Market" competitors. A song is a form of currency, a movie, a bill of rights, a cooking recipe, a joke, a wise old saying, and even laughter is a form of currency. Happiness is a form of currency. Misery loves company. Which do you prefer? Do you settle for the worst legal currency imaginable, and then when you have had enough of that doom day parade, do you prefer no currency at all? Are you waiting for approval from your masters before you invent your own currency? American history records many examples of inventive American people who produce their own currencies, stuff that does the job, and costs less than the competition. Just after Americans drove out the invading British legal criminals between 1776 and 1788, Americans invented Whiskey as a currency, because the new legal criminals at home began to oppress Americans with a new legal money extortion racket. Look it up, or take my official word for it. Product 1 and 2 can answer many questions asked by many Americans seeking answers to troubling questions, if reason is used, if logic is used, and if dogma is set aside for the merest fraction of time. In detail: Product 1 is a no-interest loan produced by any producers anywhere and preferably producers with at least some measure of oversight, transparency, traceability, and accountability, or, in other words, a license. The license holder (or by whatever means that holds the producer accountable other than a license) produces product 1, and offers product 1 to consumers who want product 1. Product 1 is an amount of legal money. The producer of product 1 creates an amount of money. That amount of money is a debt note charged to the borrower of that amount of money, on the borrowers good faith and credit, and that money is used for one thing only. Product 1 us used by the borrower to pay off an existing mortgage loan, one thing, only one thing, or buy a new home (or an existing home) with a new mortgage, one thing. Product 1 is not an inflationary device, not something to be used in the work of Booming and economy, and then Busting an economy, because the only thing that happens with Product 1, the only thing that can happen with it, is exactly what it does, which is to pay off interest bearing mortgages, and allow wealth earning people, the actual people who produce wealth, to borrow from their own good faith and credit, and avoid the tax of mortgage interest. You must allow your mind to become free from the dogma for the tiniest of a fraction of a second, allow that window of opportunity to crack open slightly, just for a second. Then slam it shut. The truth here will work on you, or you are too far gone. Challenge me, see what happens. Challenge this offering, see what happens, do so in the privacy of your own mind, if you still have one. I will be back on this path. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Presidential Challenger |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, What solutions do the other challengers offer to those who seek to hire a representative to represent them in the highest office of government? I offer 2 things only, but these two things are tangible things, these two things are unambiguous things, and anyone, anywhere, can know exactly what these things are, exactly what these things intend to accomplish, and therefore anyone, anywhere, can judge these things to see, without leaving any room to invent hidden messages, or discover secret messages in between the lines, or stumble upon hidden messages in the fine print, or suffer the results of constructive interpretations that were not obviously disclosed initially, and therefore anyone, anywhere, can know if these two things will represent their personal interests - according to their own power of accurate discernment, without dependence upon a self-elected authority on the subject. Before I repeat these things I can offer, as a challenge, to be judged in competition with whatever any other challenger offers, I will communicate a few words that intend to expose the true nature of that highest office of government to which all the challengers seek to control. The office of President of the United States of America is a position of power that presides over all of the collective power produced by all of the productive people who produce surplus wealth within the designated legal boundaries of a legal fiction, and the legal fiction is a corporation, and the corporation is legally limited in the power to hold the officers accountable for any consequence, intended or not, resulting from willful actions perpetrated by those officers who use that power that they alone control. The office of President of the United States of America is not a Federated Democratic Republic, it is not a government designed to accomplish the task of perpetuating liberty, it is designed to be an ambiguous legal fiction used to cover willful enforcement of a perpetual dictatorship. Your ancestors knew this, they warned you, and you failed to discover this fact; so if you think I am seeking absolute power, so as to abuse absolute power, you are half right. You are half wrong. I offer two products only. I see no reason to do anything else with the power gained when gaining the office of President of the United States of America. I can add to those two products such things as total transparency, live video feeds, of all activities concerning the operation of government, real time documentation, published on the internet, constantly; reality television, live from the transparent office of President of the United States of America - if you have any interest in such a principled method of operating government. You can watch the president in action, even see how the president avoids being assassinated, or fails in that work. The two products I can offer are these: Product 1 is a competitive legal monetary product that is produced and offered to anyone, offered to the free market, as a home or business property loan, that does not charge the borrower any cost, and the only legal demand in exchange for the power to purchase a home, or a business property, is repayment of the total sum borrowed, or forfeiture of the home or business property purchased with the product offered in case of default on the loan. I can elaborate, and refine, the basic idea, including such details as a gradual increase in the cost, to the consumer of product 1, based upon a measurable factor of risk, such as the risks already measured with such things as a FICO score. The intent behind this product is to disconnect the legal criminals from their victims, to sever that connection whereby power flows from those who create power to those who steal it, where the mechanism by which the power is stolen is a legal money monopoly, where the operators of the legal money monopoly use that tool to create a thing called The Business Cycle, where the operators of the legal money monopoly add to and then subtract from the supply of legal units of purchasing power, on their schedule, so as to ensure that the total supply of surplus wealth does not increase to a level that is no longer within the control of the legal criminals, and to allow the legal criminals the inside information required to know when to sell (at the top of the business cycle they create) and when to buy (at the bottom of the business cycle they create on their schedule, known only to them, and to those who support them, those who lie for them, those who enforce their power to steal) so that there is thereby created a perpetual flow of power from those who create it, to those who steal it, by that specific method, without any ambiguity whatsoever, no mystery, that is how they do it, and this product literally cuts that credit card they hold as their exclusive power, cuts that credit card in half, ending that crime spree in its tracks - that paper trail ends. Product 1 gives the power back to the people who create surplus wealth, they are the true creditors, the true good faith and credit of the people of America, and when they have that power back, I see no reason why they would not make use of that power, serving their own best interests, and those producers of wealth will, by the use of that product 1, by that legal method, cut the credit card that the legal criminals have constructed, and abused, and have destroyed their own credit, and have indebted their own selves, with a debt that no serious observer can accurately balance economically. The legal criminals earn that debt, let those legal criminals deal with that debt. Product 1 replaces that whole debt structure and empowers the honest productive wealth producers of America with the power of high quality money, at the lowest cost a competitive free market will enforce, by way of the force of competition, in a free market. Product one fills the void that will become a void if, or when, the dollar pyramid scheme implodes in upon itself, the void can be filled before, or while, that implosion occurs, and product 1 supplies the demand for much needed, necessary, currency, that is the void, the void that is created in the absence of an honest productive monetary currency tool. For want of a hammer, a spaghetti noodle is a poor substitute. Cut the Federal Reserve System of Extortion credit card. Do it now, not later. Product 1 does that, along with product 2, and there will be skeptics. Product 2 intends to finance the production of both Product 1 and 2, and these two products can be designed as a legal franchise, and offered to any private contractors who can bid competitively to gain the power to profit from the production and sale of these products, limited, to the specific limits designed into the products offered, and even allowed to remain as a competitive bidding process, seeking even higher quality producers, who produce the product at a lower, and lower, cost. Product 2 is another legal financial instrument, another loan, where the charge to the consumers of the loan, the charge to the borrowers, to be paid to the producers of the loan, is limited to 1% interest, as a base limit, not factoring in additional charges determined by risk calculation, again, a known method already exists, and is already working, in the banking, and the insurance industries, whereby the costs of risks are accurately accountable, and the costs of the risks are thereby charged to the individuals who create those risks. Collective punishment is not a good idea, so why punish people who earn good credit for the deeds done by people who earn bad credit? Setting aside the calculation, and charge, for costs associated with risks, I can offer a general understanding concerning those who earn good credit and what they earn when those people who do earn good credit do all the things required in the work of earning good credit; what do they earn - exactly? Generally speaking, a person who earns good credit is a person who proves, by willful act, that they can, and do, pay back every cent borrowed, without fail. Those, therefore, are the people who prove, by willful act, that they produce surplus wealth, they produce more power than the power they consume, and the proof is well documented by accurate accounting of the financial history of each person who does, by willful act, earn good credit. They prove their power to produce more power than they consume, and they do so better than anyone else, that is what they do, and it isn't difficult to prove those facts, while they prove those facts. The good faith and credit of the American people is not ambiguous, or false, not a Utopian fantasy, it is a measurable, and accurately measurable, reality. The same exact people who are targeted by the legal criminals, are the people who empower the legal criminals, the legal criminals know exactly who they are, the paper trail is already well known, I am not inventing a means by which all the honest hard working people can be identified, and then systematically exploited. That is what is, not what I intend to accomplish with these two products. Why would anyone confuse that which is criminal, with that which can avoid crime? Who benefits from such confusion? Who produces such confusion? Product 2 does require that the borrowers increase their total profits by 1%, and that 1% increase in productivity will flow from those who create that increase in surplus wealth, to the people who produce, sell, and profit from, Products 1 and 2. Failure to pay back the purchasing power borrowed with product 2, and the extra 1% added to the total principle borrowed, results in forfeiture of the specific, listed, things purchased with product 2. Product 2 is borrowed for the purchase of products that are proven to be measurably capable of increasing surplus wealth over and above the surplus wealth used to gain ownership of those products. The design intends to move credit to areas that are proven to be profitable investments well in excess of 1%, so that the borrower, and the lender, invest surplus wealth in the work that does produce more surplus wealth. That sentence above may confuse some people. I can try to unravel that confusion, and to do so I will offer an illustrated example of how product 2 works. You have to employ your power of sympathy, and you have to step into the shoes of your future self, or you step into the shoes of your competitive neighbor, and you place this viewpoint of your future self, or your neighbor, at the bank, where product 1 and 2 is sold, in this future reality, and I can illustrate what will happen, and you can use your own brain to write your own version, as I illustrate this transaction as follows: Borrower: "What is on that list of things that I can buy if I buy Product 2?" Bank loan officer: "look at the brochure, examples are listed there, and you can invent a new product, and you can buy that new product, so long as it does produce more surplus wealth than the wealth that is consumed in its production process, by some accurate measure." Borrower: "Sounds like a whole lot of legal mumbo jumbo to me, you known, if it sounds to good to be true, it is a con game, a pyramid scheme, and I'm not going to by a bridge in Brooklyn. I wasn't born yesterday, you know." Bank loan officer: "You don't have to buy Product 2, or Product 1, you can continue paying twice what your home is worth, one entire cost of the home to the previous owner of the home, and another entire cost of a second home, a home that doesn't even exist, to our competitor bank, the one backed by the Federal Reserve Debt Pyramid Scheme, or any competitor bank under the sun, if you wish. If you think that these products before you are a pyramid scheme, what do you think the current mortgage you are paying on now is, Mr. Skeptic?" Borrower: "Ok, I'll take the first product, sure, sure, but I'm not so sure about that second one, I see on the list here, listed: Solar Panels, Electric Cars, and what is this thing here, Modular Vertical Farming Green House Units? What the heck is that?" Bank loan officer: "A solar panel is a slam dunk so long as current prices on electricity remain as high as they are generally, you will pay less for the Solar Panel than the wealth you produce by the Solar Panel, over the life span of the Solar Panel - calculated accurately, based upon where you live. More profit for people living in the Mojave Desert - of course. If current prices of electricity go up, you save even more, if current prices of electricity go down, that product will be removed from the list, as it is no longer a net generator of wealth, for that precise, and accurate reason, unless, as has been happening, Solar Panel prices go down, and Solar Panel output goes up, in which case the calculation returns to net profitability for Solar Panels, and then they remain on the list." Borrower: "What is in it for me?" Bank loan officer: "You may not be getting this, and that is OK, most people take some time to get it, but this is in your best interest because you will, as a result of this purchase, remove your entire electric bill, and in place of that entire electric bill will be a loan payment instead of an electric bill, and the loan payment will be less per month than your current electric bill." Borrower: "What if I just stop using so much electricity, then I can cut down on my electric bill, I can do that now, and if I get those damn Solar Panels, I can't do that, I am stuck with the entire monthly payment." Loan officer: "That is a very good idea, certainly, so, if you were that smart, and I'm not saying that you aren't smart, you have, Mr. Skeptic, after all, a high credit rating, you must be smart enough to manage that feat, these days, so why don't you calculate the minimum amount of electricity that you will be able to afford, and then borrow the money needed to start making that minimum amount of electricity at home, and your bill will be less than your bill if you buy that minimum amount of electricity from the central monopoly power company, with their government subsidies. Monopoly power is a subsidy, and quite a large one at that." Borrower: "Hey, look, I'm not looking for no damn subsidy, I don't want no handout, is that what you are trying to sell me, a damn handout?" Loan officer: "You must pay back every cent of the loan, plus 1 percent interest, or you forfeit the Solar Panels, and your electric bill goes up, because you no longer have cheaper made electricity made at home, by you, because you failed to earn that credit, for whatever reason, no handout, you get what you earn, is that not understandable as sound business practice?" Borrower: "I don't want no electric car neither, why would I, damn things don't get out of their own way, and what happens if I want to go somewhere, everyone knows electric cars are limited in range." Loan officer: "The electric car is only on the list so long as the price per mile of the electric car remains significantly less than the price per mile of the competition, which is, as we all know, the gasoline powered cars, and what do you think is going to happen to the price per gallon of gasoline? Currently an electric car will save you 80% per mile, or 80 cents on each dollar, and that is the savings if you buy electricity from the subsidized electric power company monopoly. You save even more if you make your own electricity independently. You save even more if you can sell excess electricity on the open market." Borrower: "You are dodging the question of range." Loan officer: "One of our customers just started a taxi service, he bought 4 new electric cars, one per each member of his family, they invented solar powered trailers that carry batteries, for those rare occasions when someone hires them to travel over 300 miles constantly, but that is a long story, and your neighbor is next in line, perhaps he already knows if he can afford Product 1 or Product 2. You can get out of line and look at the brochures, and make up your own mind, if you wish, or I can answer more questions, and I can call in another loan officer to handle the line. Do you want to know more about the Modular Vertical Green House Farming Units, they pay for themselves, and they can even generate a substantial income, well in excess of the cost of the loan, and we only charge 1%, for the loan, according to the lawful franchise." Borrower: "Why don't you go ahead with Product 1, I'll take that one, and I'll think about these other things. I have a job, a good income, I don't need more work, farming, for Christ's Sake, I'm no farmer." Loan officer: "Sure thing. I'm entering the data right now, on the web site, you can do this at home too. As far as the farming business, I can tell you that a few of our customers are using their Modular Vertical Green House Farming Units to make bio-fuel out of algae, and the cost per gallon of algae based gasoline, made by them, at their own homes, is, according to them, much less that the current price per gallon of gasoline, so they are selling their electric cars, paying off those electric car loans early, without penalty, because electric car prices are stable, and they are buying back old gasoline powered cars, because gasoline power car prices are dropping fast, and they save on gas prices because they make their own gas at home, and, one just returned to get a lone to buy 2 more Modular Units to make more cheap algae gasoline for sale at competitive, very competitive, prices. They are now directly competing with the Big Oil and winning, with higher quality gasoline at lower prices, and Big Oil is increasing their lobby expenses in Washington, here, look at the web page, the new President is tackling lobbyist personally, throwing them out, see? Wow, look, he just kicked one in the back side, isn't that amazing? I never thought I'd see the day." Borrower: "Me neither." The above illustration scratches the surface of what can be, once the people who produce surplus wealth regain control of the credit they earn. Product 1 and 2 are ideas at this time, some things that can lead to other things, assuming, of course, that the people who produce surplus wealth do eventually realize that they can no longer afford that which they cannot afford. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north972.html Anyone, That is the same link to the fire burning under The Fed. Note this question (that won't be confessed): Why are they refusing to lend money? Please, please, please put on your thinking caps for just a moment. In early 2008 the legal criminals (The people running The Fed) lorded over a known amount of total dollars. You can picture that in your mind as X. X is a measurable total number of dollars, the total account of money, the total number of dollars, when all the dollars on Earth are added up. The dollars you have in your wallet, or purse, or bank account, and every other dollar, anywhere, is that number of total dollars. Get that picture in mind, just to have a starting point, a reference point, a place to begin looking ahead, from that point or reference. Make it personal, to help get a clear understanding of that reference point, before you begin looking ahead, and remember this is a reference point that starts in early 2008. You are at your desk, you place yourself in the shoes of one of the legal criminals at The Fed, and you pick up a paper, or you go to a web page, and you look at that number of total dollars on the planet Earth and you know that what you can do is add to that number, or, if you want, you can subtract from that number, because it is within your power to do so, since you have a voting power, a say so, concerning the actual, legal, changes that will occur to that total number of dollars, before 2008 becomes 2009. You have control of X, the total number of dollars, you know the number of total dollars today, at your desk, and you decide to do what the actual legal criminals did, you decide to double that number, for some reason. The total number of dollars on Earth is X, and you decide to create that same amount of money, at your desk, and now, that you have done it, now that you have doubled the total number of dollars, you can now move that power somewhere. Everyone else, but you, has X, in early 2008, everyone else has the power to spend the total number of dollars in early 2008, and you do not have any money, or just a little money, everyone else has the rest of the total number of dollars in early 2008, in the morning on that day, and then after lunch, you decide to go ahead and double that supply of money, and now, after lunch, you have just as much money as everyone else combined, so, reasonably, you now have as much power to purchase, as everyone else combined, and you did that, for a reason, so, what is the reason, put on your thinking cap, and try to figure out the reason, because the reason is a secret, and some of us might want to know the reason, just in case we have a stake, an interest, in that reason, as that money moves from that desk to where it goes along the paper trail, as we try to follow the money from the source of the money. X = all the power to purchase held by everyone who has dollars early in the morning, early 2008 2X = as much power as everyone else combined, after lunch, and that power goes somewhere Before moving onto the point I wish to make, I see a need to report, that 2008 has come and gone, and, perhaps not coincidentally, a new war is starting - food for thought. Gary North wants to know: Why are they refusing to lend money? What I want to know, what I would do if I were the benevolent dictator in chief, strutting my royal behind right up to the legal criminals running The Fed, is this: Who, the (expletive), made you god? Then, having the power of the presidency, on live T.V., reality T.V., I would say to that legal criminal, assuming that he didn't squirm away by that time: You will either begin offering a competitive money, at a lower cost, or the honest productive people, I know, will find someone who will, and I have a few ideas to offer them, competitive ideas, that will render your extortion racket money powerless, this is your notice, (expletive)er, you can't say that you didn't know, now. It goes without saying, once you figure this stuff out, that the money was spent, is being spent, and will be spent, in the work that accomplishes the laundry list of things that must be done by any of the legal criminals who are competing for market share in the legal crime business. 1. Use the power stolen in the work of eliminating all competition. 2. Use the power stolen in the work of reducing the total power supply down to a manageable level, because too much power allows the victims to be powerful enough to avoid victimization. 3. Use the power to indoctrinate and recruit fellow criminals onto your side and no longer members of rival criminal, parasitic, groups, and no longer members of the honest productive, host, group. That short list is a general, or principle, list that has many sub categories branching out from that principle list, interesting things, things that can be studied, measured, known, and understood. You do not need confessions, I'm telling you what has been done with the power to purchase that you have created, what is being done with the power to purchase that you now create, and what will be done with the power to purchase that you will create, so long as you remain honestly powerful, and powerfully productive, which is what you do, because that is the things that must be done to accomplish the chores required in the work of production, so long as you continue to produce, will be as long as they continue to steal what you produce, until such time as you sever that connection - cut that credit card. Here is that laundry list of honest productivity: 1. Produce high quality stuff 2. Produce high quality stuff at the lowest cost 3. Agree to work cooperatively and competitively at the work that accomplishes the end result of producing higher quality stuff, at lower costs. 4. Agree to not resort to the criminal methods, such as deceit aimed to accomplish the goal of injuring innocent people, and threats of violence aimed at the goal of injuring innocent people, and acts of violence that result in the injuries of innocent people. 5. Avoid victimization (stopping sending money to the legal criminals) So the legal criminals at The Fed, are known, they do bad things, it doesn't take a genius to figure that out, so they are served with the warning, to do good or get out of the way, and examples of doing good are then presented to the honest productive people, in forms that can be easily understood, and effectively employed, whereby the work to be done, is done, and production returns to high quality productive stuff, at lower costs, instead of aggressive wars for profit, mass torture, and mass murder on scales that are unspeakable in all but the worst living hell imaginable, or made real by ignorance, apathy, and willful criminal plans and actions. The screams of the tortured innocent victims, and the piles of innocent bodies, babies, pregnant mothers, others, do not occur by accident. Know where your power to purchase goes, and then stop sending it there, once you know. Once the legal criminals at The FED are served the notice they earn, a warning, and once the power of The President, or whatever power does represent the honest working people in America, offers the alternative to the honest working productive people in America, the credit card can be cut, peacefully, simply, and effectively, and progress down the destructive path slows down rapidly, stops, and progress the opposite way, down the productive path starts, gains momentum, and accelerates at increasing rate. That brings me to my point, again, if anyone has already read my words, the money can be spent, in the following way: Product 1: A legal monetary product. A loan offered to anyone. The money is used to gain ownership of a home or a business property, to buy a new one, or pay off an existing mortgage. Product 1 charges no interest, at all, to someone who has earned a powerful, honest, productive, faithful, trustworthy, good credit history, and failing to have earned that the potential borrower, borrowing from his or her own damn self, is charged, an interest rate that is proportional to the risk the borrower earned, by failing to produce a good credit history, and that money flowing from that borrower flows to an insurance fund to offset the costs of reclaiming and reselling properties that go into default. That above may appear to be complicated, even too complicated to some, so the idea here is to assume that you have earned, by your good faith, your good trust, and your productive capacity, to pay every cent you ever borrowed, imagine that you have, if you have not, and consider how much less complicated that makes the process of accounting, and from that point of view, Product 1 is very simple. You do not pay mortgage interest for product 1. You have earned simplicity. You have earned simple legal logic. Those who have failed to earn simplicity, pay for the complexity. Is that fair enough for now? Product 1 ends the process of moving power from those who earn it to those who steal it by a significant, measurable, and accurately measurable number. I can help with simple math. Assuming that there are 300 million Americans it can be assumed that 100 million Americans will get Product 1 as soon as they can - legally. Each of an average mortgage will transfer the power that the borrower earns to the previous owner of the house, roughly 100 thousand dollars per average home, and the total cost of the house will be earned by the borrower and then transferred to the seller, and, on top of that price paid by the borrower to the seller of the home, an additional entire cost of the home, is transferred to the lender, and that practice ends with Product 1. You pay roughly half as much per month for the same house. Effectively, with product 1, each home owner pays only for the home, each home owner stops paying double for one home, whereby the cost of two homes are charged to each home owner, and the extra cost of one home, a home that does not even exist, is transferred from the borrower to the lender, and that process ends with product 1. The legal crime credit card is cut almost completely in half by that one legal monetary product. 100 million people borrow and spend 100 thousand dollars, with product 1, and they stop paying for two homes, where they get only 1 home, and they previously sent the cost of an entire home to the legal criminals who run the legal crime banking extortion racket monopoly. 100,000,000 <---------- That is the 100 million people 100,000 <---------------That is a very rough average price per home Simple math adds zeros, and I count 13 zeros, you can too. 10,000,000,000,000 There is a challenge for you, name that price. What is that number? That is the number of units of purchasing power that no longer flows to the legal criminals, and that is the number of units of purchasing power that can be saved, spent, or invested according to the individual people who have proven that they, alone, or their families working together, earn the right to spend, save, or invest that power to purchase, because they produce that power to purchase, honestly, and productively, agreeably, and without resort to deceit, threats of violence, or acts of violence, in measurable ways. Rather than stealing that power, that power is not stolen, and that Product 1 offering, accomplishes that task, as easy as American Pie, no trouble whatsoever, just do it. The Austrian Economist (dogmatists) may cry "inflation" or some other meaningless ambiguity, but when they are asked to prove the point, see what happens, their bubble bursts, and they resort to abject personal attacks, or total silence. If you want to think past the simplicity of having your hard earned wealth remain your hard earned wealth, by no longer sending your hard earned wealth to a black hole that you can't even imagine, the thing called mortgage interest, then start thinking seriously about it, just as I have done, for decades, and we can work out how that process does proceed, how the money flows, where it goes, and what consequences occur, intended, or unintended. The bottom line is that you keep the power you earn, and someone else doesn't get the power you earn, and if you want to know if "inflation" occurs, then you can do two things right now, you can think about what you will do with the money you earn, the same money that you no longer send to the black hole as mortgage interest, which is roughly accountable as half of your current mortgage payment, you pay half of your current mortgage payment, each month, with product one, you get the same house, for half the price, because you are no longer sending the cost of one whole extra house, that doesn't exist, to the legal criminals, or call them whatever word they prefer that you call them, and think, now, what you will do with that money, and I will offer you product 2, while you begin thinking what you will do with that extra money every month, and I will comment one more thing, as you do these two things that may quantify the measurable threat of inflation. If you blow that money, waste it, then you will be willfully causing inflation. If every American blows that money, those 13 zeros, they will be causing inflation. And now you are in for a shock, if you have a working conscience left in your soul, what do you think would happen of every American sent their hard earned purchasing power to buy a new war, where "our" soldiers are sent to be tortured, be murdered, or to torture others, or to murder others, would that constitute an example of blowing the money, wasting it, and would the obvious unintended consequence be, inflation, by that example of wasting money, and be an example of inflation in a very big way, not a small way, such as, perhaps, you spending the money on lap dances, or fattening food? Product 2 A second form of money is created. It is another loan. It is the other half of the already well known business strategy of giving away the razor to sell razor blades, and this product is a loan that earns the producer of the loan a profit, and the producer of the loan charges a 1% cost to each borrower. These legal loans will only move power to purchase from the legal money supply to borrowers who use that money to buy things that are things that produce more power, things that cause deflation, and things that do so in physically measurable ways, such as, for examples, solar panels, electric cars, and vertical farming modular green house units. I can help with the math on that too, but I have other things to do right now. I can only hope that the honest productive people in America want to improve their chances of survival, I can't make them. I also have to try to edit this giant wall of text before moving on. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Michael at The Libertarian Party contacted me via e-mail. I am sending my second response back to Michael: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Michael, I am running for president in my own way. I run an on-line presidential campaign. I did so during the last election cycle, and I am doing so during this cycle. I also managed to get on the ballot, officially, in 1996, as Libertarian, for the 40th California District House of Representatives. This presidential election cycle I added to my on-line campaign a reconnection to the Libertarian party, to see if I can combine my power to win the Presidential election, admittedly not powerful, alone, with the power to win the Presidential election that is measurably within the connection to the Libertarian party. You and I are defining that connection between me, a Presidential candidate, and The Libertarian Party. I was not impressed by the effectiveness of The Libertarian Party, as a power to help candidates win elections during my first experience. Now I'm not finding much measurable power in the ability of The Libertarian Party in finding candidates. I may not be up to your standard, sure, but I did answer a Libertarian Party web page solicitation concerning potential candidates. Your introductory e-mails have so far failed to even address the subject of candidacy. How can that be explained? I submit an office candidacy notice, on The Libertarian Party web page, 20 days later I receive a curious e-mail from you, as if you have no clue concerning me and the candidacy notice. How can this situation be explained - reasonably? My guess is that the people running The Libertarian Party are not working well together in the effort to find and then help the best representatives win office, and this current example reinforces that guess. The next thing, perhaps, guessing again, will be a suggestion that I run for a less powerful office. If that is the next response from you I can then know that The Presidential office is, according to you, not open to The Libertarian Party, which is what I needed to know before submitting my candidacy notice on The Libertarian Party web page. If the work being done appears to have no purpose, it may be that the purpose is to have no purpose. Joe P.S. I am now posting this e-mail on my Forum, because that is what i do, not what The Libertarian Party does, for whatever reason the people at The Libertarian Party do things. I post these things, like this e-mail, because I consider such things worth recording for future reference. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive Americans, Today I call back the representative from the Libertarian Party who contacted me via e-mail. I assume that the representative from the Libertarian Party contacted me via e-mail as a result of me contacting the Libertarian Party via their Web Page; when I sent in my notice of consideration for becoming the Libertarian candidate for president. Are there any science fiction readers among the readers here? An author wrote some very good books of which I will link one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender%27s_Game The IF tests all children on Earth and selects the brightest for the Battle School for military training. There is a concept illustrated in that book. The concept involves a process by which people move the best people toward jobs that require the best people to do those jobs the best. What is the process by which the best people to do the job of The President of the United States of America are moved into that job? I am not a pathological liar, I do not torture, and I do not mass murder, so, logically, I am not qualified to be as good as the majority of Presidents of the United States of America. Who represents whom? If the idea is to stop the flow of power from those who create power, currently flowing to the torturing mass murderers who then use that stolen power to keep the power flowing that way, then, I may not be the best to accomplish that job, but, at least, I have a working plan. Who else has a working plan? I can say with confidence that Ron Paul has a working plan, and that is about it, as far as Presidential challengers go. If the idea is to make sure that the power continues to flow from the people who create power to the torturing mass murderers who commit unspeakable crimes with that power, then any of the other pathological sociopaths running for president will do just fine. Take your pick. I have two other relevant things to address at this time. 1. That which is good for the goose, is good for the gander, or something called Universality, or, The Golden Rule, or, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, or justice, or fairness, or equity. I like the word equity, it works best. If you meet someone, anyone, and you get away with that person's power, he has less power as a result of having made contact with you, then that is the measure of inequity. Here is a link on that subject: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28063.htm The problem there is typical of a situation whereby the base, foundation, of rational thought is an error - or a willful lie. Error leads to more error. A social structure based upon crime is not a social structure based upon equity, or justice, and therefore it is as wrong to say that it is right to torture and mass murder, no matter who does it, because the basis of the wrong is wrong, the foundation of the wrong leads to more things that are wrong. This must be understood, or there will be more misunderstanding, not less. Example: The Declaration of Independence The U.S. Constitution The Bill of Rights Two of the above written documents are based, founded, upon a founding base foundation, that is equitable, fair, logical, reasonable, right, moral, universal, and as good for the goose as it is good for the gander, those two documents are the first and last in the list above. The exception is the middle document, which is in fact a document that is diametrically opposite the other two, and knowing this fact is one thing, and being ignorant of this fact is yet again something else entirely. Which is better? A. Knowing B. Ignorance Which is better for whom? 2. Getting from path B, back to Path A, can happen, but it can't happen by traveling further down path B, which leads inevitably to path C, and then not likely ever to get back to path A, more likely to end with human extinction. 1. Path A Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Equity, Fairness, Universality, good foundation, moral thoughts and actions, power used to make more power, productive life, higher quality life, lower cost life, less crime, reaching closer toward minimum crime, crime is less and less profitable, less and less affordable. 2. Path B Crime, legal or otherwise: profitable plans once executed that are designed to accomplish the goal of transferring power from those who create power to those who steal it, whereby the stolen power is then used to perpetuate that flow of power, and power is used to govern the supply of power down to a manageable level, a level that allows the criminals to set the price of power as high as they desire, and the consumers of power are powerless to avoid having to pay that price, and the criminal power is used up in the process of eliminating competition where ever, and when ever, competition arises. 3. Path C Accelerating torture and mass murder, accelerating rates of accelerated torture and mass murder, resulting in the extinction of human life, if not all life, on the unique planet Earth, for ever. Path B cannot logically be used, as a willful plan, to get back to Plan A. Who says it can? Why do they say such things? Is it a good idea or a bad idea to believe in such things, without question? If you are new to my words, then you may not know the following documented fact. I am going to link the official web page and then I am going to cut and paste the relevant quote, for you to know, if you want to know the truth. http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. When honest productive Americans want to stop traveling down path B, for whatever excuse imaginable that they are currently accepting that path, and they no longer accept the excuses for traveling down that path, and when honest productive Americans decide to travel down path A instead, they will, and not sooner, and not later, they will. I am on path A already, within the limits of my power. How about you? Here is a good measure of path B, for those who may want to know the measure of it: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ If you have in-place a replacement for the dollar unit of currency, ready to go when you decide to replace that crime in progress, you then step off Path B, and you then have Path A ready to travel down, so long as the replacement for the dollar is a competition that reaches for the highest quality at the lowest cost. Path C includes a worse medium of exchange, a lower quality, and higher cost, replacement for the dollar unit of currency, and it can be whatever you are forced to use by your oppressors because you fail to work effectively at reaching the goal of Path A. Path B is recorded on that Debt Clock, and it is no longer an affordable path, on purpose, as planned, by those who oppress you. Your oppressors are working toward their goal of ending The Dollar Hegemony and ushering in a New World Order with a new monopoly currency extortion racket, organized crime, cabal. They may fail, due to their incompetence, and a period of powerlessness may ensue, at terrible cost to the honest productive people who share the planet Earth with the criminals, the same criminals who think morality, and sharing, is a weakness. Path C works better for your oppressors, with our without their absolute control over the world's supply of legal money. Path A ends their reign of terror, cuts their credit card, and it is our honest productive form of regime change, if we work to make it our honest productive form of regime change, not something that will happen by accident, not something that will happen as a result of ignorance, or apathy, or stupidity, or by way of fraud, or by way of threats of violence, or by way of violence against the innocent. You can't reasonably, willfully, and knowingly follow path B, to get to path A, that is insane. How is it working for you so far? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.allcarselectric.com/blog/1059693_san-francisco-will-juice-your-electric-car-for-free Honest productive Americans, The link above reports a few things that you may not know, and a few things in that report may not be as accurate as possible, but the ideas, and meanings, can be instructive. There is a concept called: Give away the razor to sell the razor blades. That is an easy to understand marketing strategy that is self explanatory. An example is illustrated with the high school drug dealer. The high school drug dealer gives away addictive drugs to the high school students, making a deal with the principle, and the local police, so that all the squeaky wheels get the grease, and then the drug dealer goes in debt, giving away addictive drugs, buying drugs from Afghanistan suppliers, or buying drugs from the C.I.A., or the F.B.I, and going deeper, and deeper, into debt, until the high school students are ripe for plucking, and then the drug dealer starts charging for drugs, and then the drug dealer goes from being in debt to being out of debt, and then the drug dealer has enough money to eliminate all the other drug dealers who try to compete in the drug dealing business, at that high school, when things get rolling, as planned. So now you have two examples of a marketing strategy whereby one method is involuntary and the other method is voluntary. I. People can choose to buy razor blades from the people who give away a fancy razor, which is an obvious marketing plan, above board, no false advertisements, just good old American business. The razor blade maker makes a good razor blade, and to drum up more business the razor blade maker sinks some of the profits into an honest advertisement campaign that includes a free razor sent to a number of places where people shop, and people like free things, and people try free things to see if the thing is worth paying for once they make their decision about the quality of the free thing. II. People can be innocent, and ignorant, and exploited, in ways that include the employment of falsehood, threats of violence, and acts of violence, whereby potential victims are targeted, and a plan is hatched to entice the victims into willingly going down a very destructive path, for the victims, while the criminals make off like bandits, and the criminals laugh all the way to their bank, as they enjoy getting away with torture, mass murder, and lesser crimes; and greater crimes. I think it is important to distinguish the difference between I, and II, above, since confusion about the two separate and distinct methods of life can be destructive to the moral method, and confusion about the two methods above can be beneficial to the immoral method, and therefore it is obvious that confusion of the two, by the innocent, is desired by those who exploit the innocent, confusion is something produced by the criminals, and given away for free, the criminal elements of society make things confused on purpose. Confusion is a criminal power inflicted upon the innocent victims, smoke and mirrors. The criminal elements may also be confused, they may think such things as: Innocence is a weakness, and honestly is a weakness, and trust is a weakness, and knowledge is dangerous, and facts are to be kept secret, and other things that confuse them, as they choose the immoral method of life. Too bad for them, they reap what they sow. The link at the top of the page offers the reader a glimpse of what life can be like once the innocent members of society, those who choose the moral method of life, the honest productive Americans, once that group is no longer oppressed by the legal criminals, what life can be like, as a measurable increase in the quality of life, and a measurable reduction in the cost of life, as a direct result of reaping the rewards of following the honest, productive, true, trustworthy, non-aggressively violent path. Not utopia. You get to travel as well as before, or better than before, but now, because you were smart, you pay about 80% less per mile. While the legal criminals try to exploit you with their plans to make oil scarce, and overpriced, you choose electric transportation instead, and that single decision, that one decision, chops the power flow from you to the legal criminals off. They lose. You win. End of that story. You may say, "say it isn't so...Joe", I like my gas powered car, sooooooo muchhhhhh, and I don't want to ever abandon it, or sell it, or rent it, or loan it out, I want it, and I want it really, really bad, I'll kill to keep my gas powered car, I'll torture to keep my gas powered car, I'll mass murder to keep my gas powered car, and I'll even threaten the human species with extinction, so that I can keep my gas powered car, so, say it isn't so, Joe, I will not go electric, those pansies in San Fransisco can pound their socialist sand, up their butts, if they can get their gay friends out long enough to do so. Here is the thing, dude, about socialism, and you can take what I am going to inform you about, to the bank, or to your grave, but you can't refute the facts, you can ignore the facts, you can refuse to know the facts, you can choose to be willfully ignorant, which is a good definition of stupidity, refusing to know something, is stupid, it is a choice to be ignorant, which is stupid. Socialism can be known. there are examples of it, whenever power flows from many, to a central location, and then the little bits of power from the many accumulate into a large amount of power, you have something, and what do you call that something? Example: Many people send their son's (and daughters) to a central location, to be trained in the Art of War, and the name of the central location is The Military. What is The Military an example of, if you were to use two possible categories to place The Military within? A. Capitalism B. Socialism Does The Military belong in the Capitalism category or the Socialism category, in your mind? Example 2: Many people send their money to a fund to pay for an emergency response system whereby the people who pay into the fund can call a three digit phone number and someone will answer the phone at that number and someone will respond to the emergency. Fire, Ambulance, and Police are linked to that emergency response system. Is your knee jerking? Are you feeling the need to shout at me, and tell me how wrong I am? Would you like to be informed about the facts instead of continuing to be stupified by the confusion that is produced by your oppressors since you were an innocent child, as you never grow up as a result of such stupification from birth to grave? You may be confusing crime with socialism. You may be confusing crime with capitalism. You may be inspired to hate the socialists, and the liberals, because you think that they are all criminals, and that is very good for the criminals, and not so good for the socialists and the liberals, since you hate honest productive people along with the criminals, and you don't hate the capitalist criminals, for some strange reason. You may even love the capitalist criminals, the torturing criminals, the mass murdering criminals, so long as they say to you, the things you want to hear, as they tell you things, and they tell you lies, with a straight face, that they are capitalists, they say, and they are conservatives, according to them, and you believe them, while they know, but you don't know, or you refuse to know, that they are not capitalists, and they are not conservatives, they are criminals, legal criminals to boot. You may be inspired to hate capitalists, and hate conservatives, because you allow yourself to know that all the capitalist are criminals, and all the conservatives are criminals, and there is no way that you can ever entertain the notion that some capitalists are honest productive people, and some conservatives are honest productive people, and you may refuse to know, that among your group, there are some very bad, very bad, very bad, people, but you tolerate your own bad people, because they sooth your conscience, and they get you want you want, when you want it, so long as you keep paying the price. There are four groups where you may think that there are two groups, and I am going to offer a word or two of wisdom on this point: http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." If you think that there are two groups, you are thinking in terms that are too simple. A. Capitalists B. Socialists There are at least four groups, and you may see why it is important to know all four groups, not just two groups, for your own good. A. Involuntary Capitalists (criminals) B. Involuntary Socialists (criminals) C. Voluntary Capitalists (Honest productive Americans) D. Voluntary Socialists (Honest productive Americans) You may now think that I have wandered way off of the subject of free electricity given away in order to inspire people to buy into electric powered transportation. I can get back to that eventually. Suppose all the people who belong in group A, all the capitalist criminals, every one of them, moved to one State, within a working Federated Democratic Republic. Suppose that U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) was a working Federated Democratic Republic (it isn't, but just suppose that it is), and so, within that working Federated Democratic Republic we can pick a state to be one that belongs to group A. How about New Jersey? I was born in New Jersey. Suppose that all the Involuntary Capitalists from all over America moved to New Jersey, and since they are criminals, they lie to each other, and they threaten each other, and they use violence against each other, so as to move each other, by that method, to New Jersey. Eventually all of them do move to New Jersey. Next, for this illustrative narrative, the second group, the Involuntary Socialists, migrate to another State in the working Federated Democratic Republic, and since this group is also criminal, they also move each other by way of lies, threats of violence, and violence, and any other way that works for them, because that is how they choose to do things, and they all travel from all corners of the working Federated Democratic Republic, known as America, and they all settle in California, where I live right now. I'm now surrounded by Involuntary Socialists everywhere I look, and there isn't even one Involuntary Capitalist left in the whole State of California, not even Arnold, the Govornator. So now you have two separate and distinct, competitive, groups of people, who occupy two separate, and distinct, States in the working Federated Democratic Republic, whereby all the Criminal Capitalists moved to New Jersey, and all the Criminal Socialists moved to California. What happens to all the Voluntary Socialists and all the Voluntary Capitalists? Suppose they also vote with their feet, too, and all the Voluntary Socialists ask each other to volunteer to move to Utah, and they do, willingly, voluntarily, they just do it, they all eventually end up in Utah, because that is where all the Voluntary Socialists decide to go, as one homogeneous group of like minded individuals. Suppose the same thing happens with the Voluntary Capitalist group, as all the Voluntary Capitalists, all at once, welcome each other, and volunteer to pick a State to move to, within the working Federated Democratic Republic, and every one of the Voluntary Capitalists willfully separate from the Involuntary Socialists, separate from the Voluntary Socialists, and even separate from their close friends the Involuntary Capitalists, and all the Voluntary Capitalists move to Texas. I. Federated Democratic Republic A. New Jersey (State of the Criminal Capitalists) B. California (State of the Criminal Socialists) C. Utah (State of the Voluntary Socialists) D. Texas (State of the Voluntary Capitalists) Please use your brain for a moment, if you have one, one that works, and use what experience you have, and what knowledge you have, and begin visualizing how those States would become examples of what they are if they are filled with a steady supply of those types of people within each of those states. I will offer a brief description. A. New Jersey (State of the Criminal Capitalists) Power flows from the many power-less submissive corporate stock buyer groups to the one power-full dominant corporate stock seller group and the one power-full dominant group uses that power flowing in that direction to keep that power flowing in that direction, by limiting the production of power to a manageable level, so as to make power scarce, and so as to seize the power to demand whatever price for power they alone can demand, and the power-less submissive groups will pay that price, or leave, or die. The dominant group will produce a false advertisement campaign whereby the dominant group claims to be capitalists, when in fact they are criminals, and the power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist groups eagerly believe in the lies, as they are led to believe that the only alternative to the life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victim is a worse life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victim, and, dangled just out of the reach of the power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victims, is, just within reach if you can afford the price, the promise of becoming a member of the power-full dominant group, within the Criminal Capitalist State, and the price of admission, into that power-full dominant group, is to consume, eat, use up, expend, and exploit, any other member of that criminal group, and do so more efficiently than any other member of that group. B. California (Sate of the Criminal Socialists) Power flows from the many power-less submissive government tax payer groups to the one power-full dominant government tax collector group and the one power-full dominant government group uses that power flowing in that direction to keep power flowing in that direction, by limiting the production of power to a manageable level, so as to make power scarce, and so as to seize the power to demand whatever price for power they alone can demand, and the power-less submissive groups will pay that price, or leave, or die. The dominant group will produce a false advertisement campaign whereby the dominant group claims to be socialist, when in fact they are criminals, and the power-less submissive Criminal Socialist groups eagerly believe in the lies, as they are led to believe that the only alternative to the life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victim is a worse life of misery as a power-less submissive Criminal Capitalist victim, and, dangled just out of the reach of the power-less submissive Criminal Socialist victims, is, just within reach if you can afford it, is the promise of becoming a member of the power-full dominant group, within the Criminal Socialist State, and the price of admission, into that power-full dominant group, is to consume, eat, use up, expend, and exploit, any other member of that criminal group, and do so more efficiently than any other member of that group. C. Utah (State of the Voluntary Socialists) Voluntary members are encouraged to invest portions of their excess power, or surplus wealth, to a central fund, something similar to an insurance policy, so as to reap the reward, the return on investment, of a social benefit, in whatever form the fund is used, or spent, including such things as building roads, building hospitals, employing specialized workers who specialize in helping people avoid victimization by criminals, building things that make more power than the power consumed in the process of making power, and any other possible investment invented and proposed of which the many voluntary members will agree to invest. If the idea is agreeable there will be more, and many, investors, and if the idea is not agreeable, there will be less, and few investors, including those investors who do not want to invest in something that benefits non-investors at the same time that something benefits investors. More investors agreeing to an idea makes the idea more powerful, less investors agreeing to an idea makes an idea less powerful, and therefore there will be a demand to produce higher quality ideas, at lower costs, as the honest productive members are not victimized by a criminal power that has the power to limit power down to a manageable level, as the honest productive members are thereby not so limited in producing power, the power supply increases inversely proportional to the power that would be wasted in the work of enforcing the criminal method, and the honest productive people actually have the power to invest, or not invest, because the power they produce is not taken, and then used to make them suffer. D. Texas (State of the Voluntary Capitalists) Voluntary members are encouraged to invest portions of their excess power, or surplus wealth, to a central fund, something similar to a stock purchase, so as to reap the reward, the return on investment, of a capital benefit, in whatever form the fund is used, or spent, including such things as building roads, building hospitals, employing specialized workers who specialize in helping people avoid victimization by criminals, building things that make more power than the power consumed in the process of making power, and any other possible investment invented and proposed of which the many voluntary members will agree to invest. If the idea is agreeable there will be more, and many, investors, and if the idea is not agreeable, there will be less, and few investors, including those investors who want to invest in something that benefits the investors as well as benefiting the non-investors because generosity is an investment according to their own voluntary sense of right and wrong. More investors agreeing to an idea makes the idea more powerful, less investors agreeing to an idea makes an idea less powerful, and therefore there will be a demand to produce higher quality ideas, at lower costs, as the honest productive members are not victimized by a criminal power that has the power to limit power down to a manageable level, as the honest productive members are thereby not so limited in producing power, the power supply increases inversely proportional to the power that would be wasted in the work of enforcing the criminal method, and the honest productive people actually have the power to invest, or not invest, because the power they produce is not taken, and then used to make them suffer. Now that you have an idea, your own idea, or my offering, as to what constitutes the differences between the four political and economic categories, you can begin to further imagine what the character of each separate and distinct State in the working Federated Democratic Republic will become as they develop over time. Both of the criminally constituted States will consume themselves, or begin to conduct aggressive wars for profit outside of the working Federated Democratic Republic, and there is precedence for both in American history. Precedences: A. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is consuming itself right now. B. Massachusetts conducted aggressive wars for profit under The Articles of Confederation (a working Federated Democratic Republic) into Canada, failing to profit from the venture, leading to Shays's Rebellion, as the legal criminals running the Involuntary Legal Crime State, of Massachusetts, tried to steal the surplus wealth from the tax payers through a banking monopoly and tax scheme - a well documented fact. Both of the voluntary constituted States will not be limited by a legal crime power that willfully governs down the production of power and therefore the production of power within those voluntarily constituted States will grow powerful by that measure precisely: power not consumed in the work of governing down the production of power will not be consumed in the work of governing down the production of power. Power invested competitively will, by that precise measure, add to the increase of power produced within the voluntarily constituted States. Power traded, equitably, between the two voluntarily constituted States accelerates the increase of power gained by the voluntarily constituted States for the same reasons that trade works on any level between any number of people who voluntarily trade, equitably, to the benefit of each voluntary trader, whereby specialization, division of labor, and economies of scale work as similarly as a lever, or wheel, or pulley works as a mechanical advantage in mechanics - or physics. Power traded, inequitably, between the two involuntarily constituted States decelerates the increase of power lost by the involuntarily constituted States as each involuntary trader employs deception, false advertisements, fine print, hidden costs, dirty deals, fraud, extortion, threats of violence, acts of violence, etc., to gain at the expense of each other trader, in the effort to exploit each other, using up scarce power, that their Involuntary State Constitutions make scarce, in the useless, power-less, and destructive, expense of defending against their own self-created hell on Earth. The involuntary constituted States fail to reach agreeable, and mutually beneficial, associations, because that is their chosen method of operating, a power-less method, when compared to a voluntary constituted State arrangement. You, being what you are, may imagine yourself migrating, voting with your feet, to one of the four separate and distinct States illustrated above, or, failing to construct such a desirable State, you have no choice but to continue struggling within an obviously involuntarily constituted State, within this Corporate Nation State, which is a legal fiction, and one that is "Limited" in "liability", which means, without all the smoke and mirrors, that crime does pay, and it pays handsomely here in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Crime pays here because here, in legal crime country, society is run by criminals who pay themselves whatever they want, when they want, because they have your power, and you no longer have your power, you have been had, get used to it, or do something about it. When the victims have had enough, when they can no longer afford the bill, the victims will no longer be victims, the point at which victimization is no longer affordable, approaches, and then either the victims will resort to crime, to survive, or they will access the power of voluntary association - in each case, for each individual. A dead victim is no longer a victim, tortured to death, or murdered quickly, the same result applies. There is power in numbers, productive, or destructive. A. Become a criminal B. Die a miserable death as a victim for life C. Cut the link between you and the criminals, by some means, including the means by which you connect to honest productive people voluntarily and access the power of numbers, and gain enough power, by that method, to represent, and present, a powerful deterrent, sufficient to discourage crime, making crime no longer profitable as a lucrative means of making a living. When the honest productive people associate effectively among themselves, by whatever means they invent, and when they learn to disconnect from the criminals who produce and maintain involuntary associations, with lies, with threats of violence, and with acts of violence, then the power of numbers can begin to work exponentially, as one volunteer welcomes another volunteer, making two, and then two welcome two more, making four, and then eight, and then sixteen, and then more, and then more, and more volunteers connect voluntarily, and less criminals gain access to fewer victims, and the fewer criminals have only other criminals to exploit, and the criminals soon have no choice but to volunteer to associate, get a real job, or starve, or depend upon charity, because at that point, crime no longer pays, not legally, not in reality, because their fantasy is no longer believed by enough people to make living Hell real. Game over for the criminals among us. At that point, seriously, do you think that honest productive people would send their son's and daughter's, and their hard earned surplus wealth, to torture, and mass murder, or be tortured, or murdered, for oil, or for control of legal monopoly money power, or for whatever Hellish vision imaginable, or, instead, would the honest productive people choose something more powerful, and something less expensive, like filling up your car with electricity, 80% cheaper than gasoline, or for free, while you work at a job whereby you keep the power you produce? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, I listened to Alex Jones and Dr. Steve Pieczenik. 1. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) 2. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford the interest payments on the dollar currency debt 3. Many people in America don't have jobs My take on these things, my angle of view, is unique, as unique as anyone else's, and I can offer my unique angle of view to those who may want a competitive one to compare to their own, or anyone else's. The two products I enumerated previously help to illustrate my unique viewpoint, and those two products allow anyone else to view my unique viewpoint from their own perspective. Take problem 1 for example, and see if you can follow along with the unique viewpoint that the two products offer to you. Problem 1: U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) You can substitute any word in place of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) if you prefer not to use my unique term, if that is a problem for you as the process moves along. If you have product 1 and product 2 you may be able to afford another war in Pakistan, added to the wars that you may or may not be able to afford in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Mexico, The Drug war, The War on Terror, and whatever other war you may or may not be able to afford. Product 1 may cut your monthly mortgage payment in half, so you can afford more, more wars, if that is what you want, since you now have more power kept at home, and less power sent to the mortgage company, or sent to whomever owns your steady stream of surplus wealth. You can substitute any word in place of surplus wealth, if that is a problem for you, and you can replace that unique term of mine with the word earnings, or the word money, or any word that works for you. You earn money, you send money to someone, each month, unless you don't have a mortgage, which is your unique situation, and if that is your unique situation, you can stop reading, or you can imagine someone who does have a mortgage, or you can imagine 100 million Americans who have mortgages, or any number imaginable, so long as you keep in mind that the problem is that wars are unaffordable to someone. If you have a choice, which you don't, you could choose to opt out of one, or all, of the wars conducted by U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), fill in your own word, the wars are occurring, and someone ordered them, and many follow those orders, willingly, or unwillingly, wars are occurring, and someone does pay for them, and someone, obviously, profits from them, following the money, such as the money trail known as Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, offers an accurate account of the money trail. Are you on the list of people who receive a copy of the local or state or federal Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, like the Phone Book, are you on the list to get a free copy? No? You may yet have a mortgage that you are not up to speed on, if you don't have a home, or business, mortgage. Here is the grand total: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You may have your surplus wealth safely hidden off shore. I don't know anything about you, and I think that is nice if you do have your power secured somehow. Product one, the no interest home mortgage, denominated in a competitive currency, not dollars, not the dollars produced and maintained by The Federal Reserve people, offered to you, cuts your interest payments out of your mortgage, and what do you get for that product, once you get it? Nothing. You still have to pay off your home, you don't pay off someone else's home, a fictitious home, a nebulous home denominated in dollar interest. So now, from this perspective of now having a no interest product 1 mortgage loan, for your home, and for your business, or for a new home, or for a new business property, or both, you are in a different position to judge the number one problem spelled out above as: Problem 1: U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) You still work, you still pay off your home, and your business mortgage, if you have any, but now you don't send interest payments to wherever you are sending interest payments, and so whomever is receiving all that interest is no longer receiving all that interest, and it may not be the same thing as the National Interest, but it may be the same thing, you don't know, I think it is, but we don't know, unless we follow the money very carefully, and the point here is the point out that not sending it in the first place, may be a good place to start fixing problems. Do you need a new roof? Do you need a job? Will lowering your monthly expenses help? Will a job opportunity help? Did you see what product 2 is meant to accomplish? Product 2 offers the voter, vote for me, vote for product 2, vote for, a product 2 loan at 1 percent interest, to start a new electricity generating business, at home. The laws just changed here in California, and you may now be able to afford to invest your own credit in the work of moving solar panels to your home so as to use that investment in the work of producing enough surplus electricity to begin receiving money in exchange for the electricity you produce and sell from your home and from your business property. If you can find and have installed the solar panels affordably, then, you will not only pay off your new loan, a low interest loan, you will also have more cash flowing in by your entrepreneurial employment of your own good credit. That is the way that works. Not only do you lower your expenses, by cutting out the middle man, removing the blood sucking mortgage interest payments, wiping them from your earth, you also begin using your own good credit, profitably, for yourself, by competing with all the other electric power producers on the grid. The quality of electricity is easy to maintain, electricity is either good enough, or not good enough, as it goes through your meter into the grid. The more you invest, the more you make, and the sky is the limit, it takes money to make money, and you don't have any, until someone decides that it is past time to take our money back from the criminals. Once we decide to take our money back from the criminals, we can compete with their money, and it will be easy to win that competition, since their money is very poor stuff, for us, very good stuff for them, and the tune of that inequity is obvious, and well documented: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You can also use product 2 to buy a new electric car, or two, and even start a taxi business, or a delivery business. You can even use product 2 to buy a modular green house vertical farming unit, or a regular farm, at 1 percent interest, and begin producing your own powerful food, for use, and for sale, if you want. What happens to problem 1? 1. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford another war in Pakistan (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and another, and another) Once you are back on your feet, you have command of your own good faith and credit, and you no longer send piles of your power to never-never-land, you can more accurately judge if, or if not, you can afford another war. How about a war on falsehood? How about affording the war that uncovers all the lies, and accounts for all the criminals, in all those other wars that profit a select, and exclusive few, at the great expense of the many? How about moving onto problem 2? 2. U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) can't afford the interest payments on the dollar currency debt Those who receive profit, in whatever form profit is received, do not see problem 2 as a problem. So long as the power keeps on flowing in the direction desired, the problem is not a problem, the problem is their solution, their final solution if need be, so long as the power flows in that direction, there is no problem. If you don't like the term U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) use a better term for you. Do you receive any benefits as you send dollars to the place you send dollars? Why do dollars flow in the direction that dollars flow if you don't receive any benefits? Try collecting something. I did. I ran into a serious health bump in the road, and I would have had to become a professional benefit collector to get a drop of the investment money I sent, for 25 years, into the social security apparatus. I'm 53. I went all the way to a judge. I sat low in a low seat. The judge sat high, in a high seat. It was un-American. Americans may have to resort to begging on the path that America is on. I'm not there yet. I think there is time left to turn this thing around. The dollar is one form of currency. The dollar debt is exclusive to the dollar form of currency. When the producers of the dollar have no more use for the dollar they will no longer use it. Why should you? Do you have a brain? Is it time that you use your brain? Product 1 and Product 2 allow Americans to wean off of their dollar habit, by entering a new age of monetary competition, where either the dollar producers pony up, or they go out of business, to bad for them, it is time to move your assets. The legal criminals will move their assets in a heartbeat. Why should you not have that option? Ignorance? Apathy? Brainwashing? Carelessness? There is a religious saying. How does that go? Give Ceasar that which is Ceasars? I'll look it up. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+22%3A15-22&version=NIV So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s I think God is Truth, and that is as far as my belief in religion has progressed to date. If the fraudulent money is your choice, good luck with it. I suppose you have a reason for choosing it. If something equitable is a choice, why not take that choice instead? Criminals will choose criminal money. If there is a choice given to the victims, will they choose to be victims? Will they choose to be fellow criminals? What happens when the number of victims can no longer afford so many criminals? Product 1 and product 2 allow the observer to view the choice I'm trying to convey to you. You can choose to ignore my viewpoint. How about problem 3? 3. Many people in America don't have jobs Hire criminals to rob you, and what happens to your power to hire anyone else? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.cnbc.com/id/43127960/Gold_silver_coins_to_be_legal_currency_in_UtahHis idea isn't to return to the gold standard, when the dollar was backed by gold instead of government goodwill. Instead, he just wanted to create options for consumers. A legal money monopoly power is either global or a legal money monopoly power is national and therefore it is a competition between a nation with one national money monopoly power versus other nations with other national money monopoly powers, and therefore each nation is an internal legal money monopoly power versus internal competition, internal, where the people running the national monopoly will make internal competition against the law. The legal national money monopoly power will fine, or punish, or prosecute, or tax, or weakened by law, all internal competition to the national legal money monopoly power, so as to subsidize or strengthen the national legal money monopoly power, so that the national money monopoly power becomes an internal monopoly, because all the internal competition is destroyed, crushed, and rendered powerless by the willful actions of the people running the national legal money monopoly power. Externally there will be either competition or combination, a cartel, or cabal. 1. Competition (whereby the force of voluntary choice forces quality up and cost down) 2. Monopoly (whereby the force of deceit, threats of violence, and violence forces an end to competition) Competition is the force that forces quality up and cost down, as consumers choose the higher quality stuff, and as consumers choose the lower cost stuff, and the competitors who are offering the consumers higher quality stuff, at a lower cost, gain more customers, the better competitor gains more market share, while the lower quality competitor goes out of business, as the lower quality stuff, at a higher cost, sits on the shelf, no one buys it, or fewer and fewer people buy the lower quality stuff at a higher cost, depending upon how bad the lower quality stuff is compared to the higher quality stuff, and depending upon how much more expensive the lower quality stuff is compared to the affordable high quality stuff; so long as the consumers are well aware of the facts concerning what is and what is not high quality, and what is, and what is not, affordable. When a competitor takes control away from a legal money monopoly power the change from a monopoly to a working competition is called a revolution. A revolution occurs inside a nation when the legal money monopoly power is usurped, taken over, weakened, made less powerful, destroyed, ended, gone, removed, and when the regime of a long standing reign of legal monopoly money terror ends, it is peacefully ended by a revolution of choice, a revolution of competition, and a revolution by which the force of competition is no longer criminalized by the legal monopoly money terror regime. The people then pick the higher quality money, at the lower cost, and the lower quality money at a higher cost goes out of business. The legal criminals have to get real jobs, where they have to please the customers, instead of having the victims obey every command dictated by the monopoly power dictators, at their exclusive pleasure. 1. Competition (power commanded by the people) 2. Dictatorship (exclusive, monopoly, power) The Federal Reserve System of fraud, national legal money monopoly power reign of terror, goes out of business, peacefully, quietly, and irreversibly, as the people then know the power they always had, the power that was stolen, the power to use their own power to choose better instead of worse, better instead of the lesser of two evils (bad money or no money), and free and open, fair and equitable, competition, instead of fraudulent, threatening, and violent legal money monopoly crime reign of terror by the current long standing regime. Gone is this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ The link at the top of the page illustrates the force of competition that eliminates the legal money monopoly power of destruction that is reported in the debt clock link. There are other examples of how legal choice, legal competition, removes the power to monopolize money, and weakens the power that the few have as the few steal the power of the many, and then the few use that stolen power to keep stealing from the many, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of terrible violence. Here are two more illustrated examples of how the many regain the power of competition over the monopolistic few: http://www.umungu.com/scrip.htm http://utopianist.com/2011/01/stimulus-writ-small-tiny-california-town-prints-its-own-currency/ The concept is simple. A monopoly power is a power that dictates the quality and cost of the stuff that the monopoly power produces, and the consumers have no choice but to buy, or consume, the monopoly power products, by definition, that is the definition of a monopoly power. On the other hand there is competition, which is a competitive choice when compared to no choice. 1. Obey 2. Choose something better Example: Today the U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) group of people claim to lord over a world monopoly power that has been called The Dollar Hegemony, You must use dollars, you have no choice, and many people are being forced to use dollars, to buy oil, to gain access to world markets. These are words that are reporting facts, you can look into the facts yourself, and you can use whichever words you prefer to use to describe the facts. Soon The Dollar Hegemony will no longer be the global monopoly power and it is likely that the new global monopoly power will shift to China, and that shift may occur after World War III, even if you don't like it, even if you prefer not to contemplate it, even if you think anyone suggesting it is to be ignored by you, at any cost, to anyone but you, and the point here is to point out what can happen after the shift of world legal money monopoly power shifts from The Dollar Hegemony to China in relation to the force of competition. A. Enforced world reserve currency (by any other name it is the same thing, if it is American based, it is the same thing, if it is based in China, it is the same thing) B. Competition forcing higher quality and lower costs (not a monopoly maintained by deceit, threats of violence, and acts of vicious and terrible violence) If World War III happens, and if all life on Earth isn't destroyed as an "unintended consequence", and if China is where the world legal money monopoly power people shift their base of operations, then the people within U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) will be in the position that the people in China are in now, and the people in China will be in the position that the people in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are in now. They (The Chinese) will be the reigning world legal money monopoly power and we (U.S.A. Inc. LLC) will be the lesser legal money power. What does that mean? The question has four parts. 1. What does the shift of power from The Dollar Hegemony mean for the select few who control the issue of The Dollar Hegemony money - The Dollar? 2. What does the shift of power to The Chinese Hegemony mean for the select few who control the issue of the Chinese Hegemony money - no longer The Dollar? 3. What does the shift of power from The Dollar Hegemony mean for the people within the legal boundaries of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), those who do not control the issue of The Dollar? 4. What does the shift of power to The Chinese Hegemony mean for the people within the legal boundaries of China, those who do not control the issue of the new world monopoly money power? If we, the people of America, want access to world markets then we have to pay them, the people who issue to new world reserve monopoly currency money in China, they, the people in China, no longer have to pay the few who run The Dollar Hegemony. It is that simple, and it is that complex, because complexity is produced so as to cover up the simple truth. The honest productive people in America, and the honest productive people in China, always get the short end of the stick, and the few people who run the legal money monopoly confidence schemes always get the power that is created by the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals use that stolen power to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use deceit to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use torture to perpetuate the crime in progress, and they use mass murder to perpetuate the crime in progress, and that, in one word, is war, and it has been, and it will be, world war, by any other name, the screams of agony, and the piles of innocent dead people measure the same thing, over, and over, and over again, until such time as the victims own up to their own lethal part in the dirty business cycle. If you do not understand that, then you are ignorant. That is the hard fact, read it and weep, or whatever reaction you suffer once you know the truth, just know it. The point about competition can be pointed out competitively and it can be done so long as the reader keeps in mind the above scenarios. A. Present situation with The Dollar Hegemony reigning over The Worlds Reserve Currency and in so doing all competitors have to pay The Dollar Hegemony to gain access to world markets, in particular the oil markets. B. Future situation with The Chinese Hegemony reigning over The worlds Reserve Currency and in so doing all competitors have to pay The Chinese Hegemony to gain access to world markets, in particular the oil markets. What happens in either case if any country, or any city, or any county, or any state, anywhere on earth, if the people running the law power in that city, county, state, republic, or nation, allow either money to be used, The U.S. Dollar, or The Chinese Dollar, just those two, instead of just one? What happens? If you are going to understand this you have to get on a personal level with it. You can legally choose to be paid in U.S. Dollars or Chinese Dollars. You are legally forced to accept either U.S. Dollars, or Chinese Dollars, by laws in your city, county, state, nation, republic, and world. Instead of no choice, which is what you have now, you have 2 choices, instead of monopoly force working against you, you have the force of competition working for you. What happens to this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/? What happens to that, that debt clock, when competition is a force of law, instead of monopoly being a force of law, and get personal with the concept, know it, be it, realize it, yourself. A few possible situations arise: A. Those who want their money to collect interest pick the money they want, while those who don't want to have to pay interest pick the money they want, and which money takes over more customers than the other money? Which do you pick, when you have a choice? B. Those who want their money to be more powerful, to buy more, for less, pick the more powerful money, and those who want their money to buy less, to be the less powerful money pick the less powerful money, and which money takes over more customers? Which money is your choice because of your personal reasons for choosing your better money? C. The Chinese Dollar makers, producers, printers, and maintainers make a deal with the U.S. Dollar producers to make their moneys the same, so that there is no longer any difference, they are one and the same money, with different ink patterns printed, virtually the same money, so there is no longer a choice. Do you now look for a competitive money since the two legal choices have become one monopoly power (like republicans and democrats becoming republocrats or demilicans). You have to make this personal, pick a money, which do you pick today? Logically you pick the money that works best for you today, and you may pick The Dollar Hegemony, World Reserve Currency Money, today, because The World Reserve Currency is based in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) and that is also where you live, so that is what you choose to do, and you have no idea why anyone else would pick the Chinese stuff. You go with the flow, until it become obvious that the flow is changing course, and then you go with that flow. Now it is the reign of The Dollar Hegemony, and there is a score board for it: The Debt Clock denominated in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) units of money: dollars. Time goes by, World War III goes by, perhaps it was less than expected, the human beings are still alive, and now you have the same choice, but now the World Reserve Currency Money is Chinese money, and now more people are choosing the Chinese stuff, here in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), and in China, the flow of power is flowing from The Dollar to the competition, in a big way. Now what do you choose, if you have a choice? Why do they choose The Chinese money once the Chinese money becomes the world reserve currency, and once the shoe is on the other foot? You have to make this personal. 1. Do you want more for less? 2. If you have a choice will you choose less for more? 3. Will you willingly, knowingly, and, with malice aforethought, choose more for you at the expense of someone else? All the supposed legal mumbo jumbo, the fine print, the expert testimony, and the authoritative commentary about money, legal or not, is smoke and mirrors, and it is meant to hide the truth from the victims. If you have the choice, which you don't, you will pick the path that you can afford instead of picking the path that you cannot afford - once you know the truth. Look, please, please, please, at the link that reports to you the path that you cannot afford: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ You have to make this personal, because it is personal, and if you do not make this personal, despite the fact that other people have made this personal, you will suffer as a result, you will remain a victim, the next generation will remain victims, and the legal criminals reign of terror will perpetuate, and the result may well be the extinction of all life on earth. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
05-26-2011 Anyone, There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between two opposing forces that you may call The Federal Government and The People of Texas. I am speaking about the current events involving the Texas State Senate, as some of the members of that legal group aided and abetted, giving legal support, to the people in TSA, where the people in TSA have been, are, and will be guilty of injuring innocent victims. You can continue to call the power struggle a battle between The Federal Government and The People of Texas; I will not do such a service to the legal criminals, and I will not abandon the innocent victims by failing in that manner. I will call the legal criminals what they are; I will call the legal criminals what they define themselves to be, by their actions, if not by their willful, honest, confessions. If you hire liars, you must want lies. There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between the Legal Criminals and the honest productive people of America. This chapter unfolding now is one episode; and it is quite possibly similar to a small earthquake, and one that indicates an impending larger earthquake, since the last time this type of battle occurred, has been well over a century. I think that the honest productive people may well learn from that history; and learn the lesson well. I will make this as brief as possible. Agriculture began as an exponential increase in the power to create surplus wealth among cooperative (meaning honest, productive, people, worthy of trust) people, to such a degree, that Pyramids could be made with such a huge increase in economic power gained through agriculture. Agriculture also offered many forms of currency, or money, such as water flowing through channels, from central locations, through gates, and onto farming fields. Another form of currency was invented, produced, and used, whereby excess food was harvested at many individual farms and then transported on roads to central locations, and depositors of food where then issued records of their deposits. The records of deposits, or receipts, served as tax records, and as money, or monetary currency. If money doesn't flow, it is not currency. If it doesn't flow it has only potential power. If money has no power, to purchase, it isn't money. If you have none, you can't play. If you have no water, you can't farm. How much will you pay for water, if you have none? When individual members of the honest and productive group were known to be destructive, the rest of the group could, as a means of exclusion, cut off the supply of currency to the destructive people. What happens when the destructive people gain control over the supply of currency? The answer is abundantly clear to anyone who cares to know the truth. Example: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is a modern day version of farmers sending their power to the central location, making the farmers weaker, and making the people running the show powerful enough to order, a Pyramid or two, or three, or an aggressive war for profit, or four, or a squad of goons to make sure that the flow of power keeps flowing in that exclusive direction. Stop reading my confusing words, since I speak a different language. I speak facts, just not the ones people want to hear. Read this instead: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0230602576/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=1151480835&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1KX1CSSV22HZTD46JEGZ Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy I'll get my copy and quote some from that book; after a few comments. The honest productive people got away from the legal criminals, more or less, as they migrated to North America, encountering cultural conflicts with the natives, but overall getting out from under the thumb of the King of England, and out from under the control of the English monetary system of fraud, taxation without representation. etc. The honest productive people still had legal criminals among them, they always will, but the honest productive people made their own money system, honest money, productive money, powerful money, useful money, equitable money, two-way money, not one-way money. The honest productive people began to construct their own forms of government modeled after the Swiss Republican System, which was a Federated Democratic Republic, which managed to maintain separate and sovereign legal entities, or States, within a Federated, voluntary, Union. Each State had their own constitutions, there was even a State called Franklin, named after Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin even wrote one of the constitutions of the time period. I would like to see a copy. The State of Franklin was not accepted at first, and by the time the State was accepted into the Union, the Union became a National, involuntary Union, by way of fraud, and by that time the State was named Kentucky, The honest productive people, in each separate and sovereign State, made things official, with a document called The Declaration of Independence, and the leaders of the time set about defending their official declaration of independence, which was a way of saying to the King, you think you own us, we do not. The King sent many ships, many conscripted soldiers, many mercenaries, and the honest productive people got help from the French. An effort was made to drive the criminals out of North America, by an all volunteer army, under an experimental voluntary union of separate, liberated, voluntary, unionized, legal fictions, or States. The all volunteer Army, under Washington, and other less famous leaders, and with the help of the French, drove out the British legal criminals - wining the so called war for independence. It was more like a police action to me. Criminals don't obey moral law, including the ones they enforce. Voluntary armies deputize themselves with the power to enforce moral laws, such as helping little children as little children are being molested by TSA agents with badges, and claims of authority; whereby they claim to have the authority to molest little children. They don't call it molestation, that would amount to a confession of guilt, and then the criminals would loose their cover story; they aren't the sharpest tool in the box, but they do get paid to molest children, so, they can't be too stupid, in their own measure. You pay them, what does that say about you? You pay them to molest children. People don't like reading what I have to say. It isn't a mystery to me. So the honest productive people drove the criminals out, and then went back to work. Soon a new home grown group of legal criminals emerged in Massachusetts, and the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic was tested. One state began playing with dishonest money, using the stolen power, stolen from the only place power can be stolen from (other than from other criminals), which is the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals in Massachusetts began using the stolen power to commit aggressive wars for profit, against natives, and against Canadians. The legal criminals lost, they lost all the money, they didn't get the booty, and they raised the taxes, and they inflated the currency, which drove out the gold, and then, as legal criminals are apt to do, they outlawed the monetary competition, which was Whiskey, yes, Whiskey was the go-to-money of the day, which people could make at home, to use as money to buy other things, in the absence of gold, or better money, such as stamp script. The genius of the Federated Democratic Republic began to take shape when the rebels who fought the war for independence against the British legal criminal monetary frauds. then took up arms again to fight the home grown legal criminals monetary frauds running Massachusetts; which was still legal, it was still legal to rebel against a criminal government, how could it not be legal to Declare Independence - who undeclared it? The beauty of the Federated Democratic Republic was such that the people running The Articles of Confederation were not inclined, legally, to aid and abet, and give legal support, or even material support, to either side in the internal conflict in Massachusetts. The legal criminals won. The rebels who won the first war for independence, lost the second one, but all was not lost, except for all the casualties, but all was not lost for the survivors, who voted with their feet, and moved to Vermont. The victorious legal criminals in Massachusetts petitioned the leaders of the legal fiction known as Vermont, to hand over their runaway slaves, hell, they owned them after all, but, and again the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic shows up, the leaders of Vermont didn't hand over the free men who voted with their feet by moving out of the criminal state of Massachusetts and moving to the not as criminal, or perhaps even liberated State, of Vermont, all nice and tidy within the experimental Federated Democratic Republic under The Articles of Confederation. I am keeping this short, hell, I have to edit it. Liberty is not handed down on a silver platter, even if you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth. Someone mined the silver. Me nephew offers a quote he heard: He was born on 3rd base and he thinks he has hit a triple. The home grown legal criminals knew what was up, how could they not, their gravy train, their fast track to monetary nirvana, their monopoly, threw a rod. Their motor seized. The damn experiment works, the legal criminals' goose was cooked, the golden egg wasn't, it was a turd - to them. They had to do something. They did this: http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 They posed as Federalists. They claimed that The Debt had to be paid. Does that sound familiar? They were Nationalists, and Monarchists, and criminals. And they claimed to be against mob rule. And in order to get their "Constitution" ratified they appealed to the mob, with lies, with fabrications, with claims of noble intent, and they threw out a working Federated Democratic Republic and placed, in place, a Nation State, and their "Constitution" enabled all that it's opponents warned it would create. The ratification process included the already mentioned fraud, false advertizements, appealing to the mob, and a Dirty Compromise between the industrial Northern legal criminals and the agricultural southern legal criminals to divide the spoils of their victory over the honest productive people, including the black slaves, who were then legally bound to be returned to their owners upon request, anywhere within the newly formed Nation State. Many honest productive people were duped into believing in the lies produced by the Nationalists, the same nationalists who were hiding behind a thin veil of "Federalism". One of the dupes, taken in by the fraud, was a person named James Madison. James Madison jumped sides as quickly as George Washington; and I can explain, because this is important and relevant to current events; as the power struggle continues between the legal criminals (TSA, and their employers) and the opposition: the honest productive people (always the targets of the legal criminals). James Madison was the perfect dupe; as he wrote all the right things, to help convince the honest productive people (the mob, the rabble, the majority, the people, the tax payers) that the "Constitution" was going to be a better experimental Federated Democratic Republic, which it was categorically not, it was a Nation State, by design, it was a consolidated government, and it was tailored to be misconstrued, it was an enabler, it enabled plausible deniability, it could be constructively interpreted, on purpose. James Madison later grew a conscious, sufficient enough to admit error, and he then set about to oppose the people who were then constructively interpreting the consolidated government enabler, as James Madison then authored roughly half of The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. That is in the book I linked; you can stop reading my unwelcome text and read that book, and profit from the investment, or return here and blame me for your wasted effort. Please do. Back at the story line whereby Washington, having led the fight to oppose the British Monarchy, system of monetary fraud, and legal crime, complete with wars of aggression for profit, and all the crimes that spring for from that one, Washington, once enabled to do the contrary, changing sides, authored the following: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html King George: And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit; The Spirit George crushed was the same spirit within The Declaration of Independence, it was the Spirit of 1776. George assembled a conscript army, named The Watermelon Army, reportedly as large as the one he led to enforce liberty, and George took that army into Pennsylvania, a formerly separate and sovereign state, and crushed the second Whiskey Rebellion; whereby the new monetary frauds (Alexander Hamilton for example) were playing the same fraudulent monetary game, moving surplus wealth out of the hands of the people who create it, and into the hands of the people who steal it, and when the victims invent their own replacement currency, again Whiskey, the monetary monopoly enforcers, with their legal enabling documents, crush the competition where ever, and when ever it arises. Just ask Alexander Hamilton; when you meet him in hell - if that is where you are headed. I'm may be going there too. I have yet to see the light - but I do look for it. After some very bad things, whereby the legal criminals, enabled with their enabling legal documents, their licenses to torture, and murder, and even worse crimes, in between Georges test case, crushing "so fatal a spirit" and in between that historical event and the inappropriately named Civil War, which was not civil by any measure, more slaves were created than were set free, unless death is a measure of freedom, hell, slaves didn't have to pay money tax before the war, they paid in work and hide, they were not set free, they just changed masters. Many slaves now are slaves to falsehood, including me. I am setting myself free - the only way to get free - with help. In between those two events, the crushing of the spirit of 1776, and the Not So Civil War, was The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the things I want you to read about. The things I just now tried to clue you in on pertain to The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, relative to current events, as the power struggle continues. On the one side of the power struggle in The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the honest productive people represented by James Madison, writing for the Kentucky legal fiction, and Thomas Jefferson writing for the Virginia legal fiction, formerly a separate and sovereign state within a working experimental Federated Democratic Republic, but then a subordinate, lesser, and relatively insignificant power, a subject of, the legal criminals running the Nation State legal fiction; with its plausibly deniable enabling documentation: The Constitution. The opposition to The Constitution also tried to lessen the defeat with The Bill or Rights. How are they working for you now? I'll get a relevant quote from the reference book, and then continue comments. If you have read this far, you will now see the relevance to current events - if you care to see.
Jackson was fully prepared to enforce a tax law. I can find it again, in the source book. Jackson was no stranger to violence as a supposed means of solving problems. In the summer of 1832, Congress passed a new tariff bill. The average rate was reduced to 25 percent of the value of the imported goods. However, rates on iron, woolens, and cottons remained at the 50 percent level. To make matters worse in the Carolinians' eyes, the national treasury expected to enjoy a surplus in the 1830s as a result of the retirement of the debt from the War of 1912. As much as they loathed protection, South Carolinians were willing to be taxed to pay their portion of the war debt. But with debt retirement on the horizon, the tariff became even more unpopular. In short: The Northern power used their influence over the Nation State to skew tax burden onto the Southern power, and the Southern power used their influence within their not-so-sovereign State to write enabling documents that included nullification of the National tax, and included a call to arms to defend against invasion by National troops ordered to enforce the tax. Troops assembled, reportedly, on both sides. Stepping back in time a moment: The Dirty Compromise, in 1788, so as to enable "The Constitution", was a momentary truce between the legal criminals of the North, and the legal criminals of the South. The Nation state enabled one power to annex (steal) the other power. The Constitution ensured a Civil War, that is a documented fact. A Nation State is not a working Federated Democratic Republic. Separate and Sovereign states can succeed from a voluntary union, if they cant' it isn't a voluntary union, it is a Consolidated Nation State, a legal monopoly power. Monopoly powers cannot exist in competition with other powers; competition is the opposite of monopoly. The existence of competition nullifies the existence of a monopoly - by definition. Competition forces quality up, and cost down, even governments, even money. Monopoly forces the opposite, go figure. Separate and Sovereign States define their state of sovereignty, fictionally speaking, as do human beings define their sovereignty, but literally speaking. When you are ordered to obey, and you do obey, even though you know that unqualified obedience is as wrong as the torture, and the mass murder, and the end of the species, that occurs on that path, then you define the opposite of sovereignty. You are a slave; but that isn't nice to know, so ignore it, while you can? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
05-26-2011 Anyone, There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between two opposing forces that you may call The Federal Government and The People of Texas. I am speaking about the current events involving the Texas State Senate, as some of the members of that legal group aided and abetted, giving legal support, to the people in TSA, where the people in TSA have been, are, and will be guilty of injuring innocent victims. You can continue to call the power struggle a battle between The Federal Government and The People of Texas; I will not do such a service to the legal criminals, and I will not abandon the innocent victims by failing in that manner. I will call the legal criminals what they are; I will call the legal criminals what they define themselves to be, by their actions, if not by their willful, honest, confessions. If you hire liars, you must want lies. There is a running history of events such as the current power struggle between the Legal Criminals and the honest productive people of America. This chapter unfolding now is one episode; and it is quite possibly similar to a small earthquake, and one that indicates an impending larger earthquake, since the last time this type of battle occurred, has been well over a century. I think that the honest productive people may well learn from that history; and learn the lesson well. I will make this as brief as possible. Agriculture began as an exponential increase in the power to create surplus wealth among cooperative (meaning honest, productive, people, worthy of trust) people, to such a degree, that Pyramids could be made with such a huge increase in economic power gained through agriculture. Agriculture also offered many forms of currency, or money, such as water flowing through channels, from central locations, through gates, and onto farming fields. Another form of currency was invented, produced, and used, whereby excess food was harvested at many individual farms and then transported on roads to central locations, and depositors of food where then issued records of their deposits. The records of deposits, or receipts, served as tax records, and as money, or monetary currency. If money doesn't flow, it is not currency. If it doesn't flow it has only potential power. If money has no power, to purchase, it isn't money. If you have none, you can't play. If you have no water, you can't farm. How much will you pay for water, if you have none? When individual members of the honest and productive group were known to be destructive, the rest of the group could, as a means of exclusion, cut off the supply of currency to the destructive people. What happens when the destructive people gain control over the supply of currency? The answer is abundantly clear to anyone who cares to know the truth. Example: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is a modern day version of farmers sending their power to the central location, making the farmers weaker, and making the people running the show powerful enough to order, a Pyramid or two, or three, or an aggressive war for profit, or four, or a squad of goons to make sure that the flow of power keeps flowing in that exclusive direction. Stop reading my confusing words, since I speak a different language. I speak facts, just not the ones people want to hear. Read this instead: [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0230602576/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=1151480835&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1KX1CSSV22HZTD46JEGZ[/url] Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy I'll get my copy and quote some from that book; after a few comments. The honest productive people got away from the legal criminals, more or less, as they migrated to North America, encountering cultural conflicts with the natives, but overall getting out from under the thumb of the King of England, and out from under the control of the English monetary system of fraud, taxation without representation. etc. The honest productive people still had legal criminals among them, they always will, but the honest productive people made their own money system, honest money, productive money, powerful money, useful money, equitable money, two-way money, not one-way money. The honest productive people began to construct their own forms of government modeled after the Swiss Republican System, which was a Federated Democratic Republic, which managed to maintain separate and sovereign legal entities, or States, within a Federated, voluntary, Union. Each State had their own constitutions, there was even a State called Franklin, named after Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin even wrote one of the constitutions of the time period. I would like to see a copy. The State of Franklin was not accepted at first, and by the time the State was accepted into the Union, the Union became a National, involuntary Union, by way of fraud, and by that time the State was named Kentucky, The honest productive people, in each separate and sovereign State, made things official, with a document called The Declaration of Independence, and the leaders of the time set about defending their official declaration of independence, which was a way of saying to the King, you think you own us, we do not. The King sent many ships, many conscripted soldiers, many mercenaries, and the honest productive people got help from the French. An effort was made to drive the criminals out of North America, by an all volunteer army, under an experimental voluntary union of separate, liberated, voluntary, unionized, legal fictions, or States. The all volunteer Army, under Washington, and other less famous leaders, and with the help of the French, drove out the British legal criminals - wining the so called war for independence. It was more like a police action to me. Criminals don't obey moral law, including the ones they enforce. Voluntary armies deputize themselves with the power to enforce moral laws, such as helping little children as little children are being molested by TSA agents with badges, and claims of authority; whereby they claim to have the authority to molest little children. They don't call it molestation, that would amount to a confession of guilt, and then the criminals would loose their cover story; they aren't the sharpest tool in the box, but they do get paid to molest children, so, they can't be too stupid, in their own measure. You pay them, what does that say about you? You pay them to molest children. People don't like reading what I have to say. It isn't a mystery to me. So the honest productive people drove the criminals out, and then went back to work. Soon a new home grown group of legal criminals emerged in Massachusetts, and the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic was tested. One state began playing with dishonest money, using the stolen power, stolen from the only place power can be stolen from (other than from other criminals), which is the honest productive people, and then the legal criminals in Massachusetts began using the stolen power to commit aggressive wars for profit, against natives, and against Canadians. The legal criminals lost, they lost all the money, they didn't get the booty, and they raised the taxes, and they inflated the currency, which drove out the gold, and then, as legal criminals are apt to do, they outlawed the monetary competition, which was Whiskey, yes, Whiskey was the go-to-money of the day, which people could make at home, to use as money to buy other things, in the absence of gold, or better money, such as stamp script. The genius of the Federated Democratic Republic began to take shape when the rebels who fought the war for independence against the British legal criminal monetary frauds. then took up arms again to fight the home grown legal criminals monetary frauds running Massachusetts; which was still legal, it was still legal to rebel against a criminal government, how could it not be legal to Declare Independence - who undeclared it? The beauty of the Federated Democratic Republic was such that the people running The Articles of Confederation were not inclined, legally, to aid and abet, and give legal support, or even material support, to either side in the internal conflict in Massachusetts. The legal criminals won. The rebels who won the first war for independence, lost the second one, but all was not lost, except for all the casualties, but all was not lost for the survivors, who voted with their feet, and moved to Vermont. The victorious legal criminals in Massachusetts petitioned the leaders of the legal fiction known as Vermont, to hand over their runaway slaves, hell, they owned them after all, but, and again the genius of a Federated Democratic Republic shows up, the leaders of Vermont didn't hand over the free men who voted with their feet by moving out of the criminal state of Massachusetts and moving to the not as criminal, or perhaps even liberated State, of Vermont, all nice and tidy within the experimental Federated Democratic Republic under The Articles of Confederation. I am keeping this short, hell, I have to edit it. Liberty is not handed down on a silver platter, even if you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth. Someone mined the silver. Me nephew offers a quote he heard: He was born on 3rd base and he thinks he has hit a triple. The home grown legal criminals knew what was up, how could they not, their gravy train, their fast track to monetary nirvana, their monopoly, threw a rod. Their motor seized. The damn experiment works, the legal criminals' goose was cooked, the golden egg wasn't, it was a turd - to them. They had to do something. They did this: http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 They posed as Federalists. They claimed that The Debt had to be paid. Does that sound familiar? They were Nationalists, and Monarchists, and criminals. And they claimed to be against mob rule. And in order to get their "Constitution" ratified they appealed to the mob, with lies, with fabrications, with claims of noble intent, and they threw out a working Federated Democratic Republic and placed, in place, a Nation State, and their "Constitution" enabled all that it's opponents warned it would create. The ratification process included the already mentioned fraud, false advertizements, appealing to the mob, and a Dirty Compromise between the industrial Northern legal criminals and the agricultural southern legal criminals to divide the spoils of their victory over the honest productive people, including the black slaves, who were then legally bound to be returned to their owners upon request, anywhere within the newly formed Nation State. Many honest productive people were duped into believing in the lies produced by the Nationalists, the same nationalists who were hiding behind a thin veil of "Federalism". One of the dupes, taken in by the fraud, was a person named James Madison. James Madison jumped sides as quickly as George Washington; and I can explain, because this is important and relevant to current events; as the power struggle continues between the legal criminals (TSA, and their employers) and the opposition: the honest productive people (always the targets of the legal criminals). James Madison was the perfect dupe; as he wrote all the right things, to help convince the honest productive people (the mob, the rabble, the majority, the people, the tax payers) that the "Constitution" was going to be a better experimental Federated Democratic Republic, which it was categorically not, it was a Nation State, by design, it was a consolidated government, and it was tailored to be misconstrued, it was an enabler, it enabled plausible deniability, it could be constructively interpreted, on purpose. James Madison later grew a conscious, sufficient enough to admit error, and he then set about to oppose the people who were then constructively interpreting the consolidated government enabler, as James Madison then authored roughly half of The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. That is in the book I linked; you can stop reading my unwelcome text and read that book, and profit from the investment, or return here and blame me for your wasted effort. Please do. Back at the story line whereby Washington, having led the fight to oppose the British Monarchy, system of monetary fraud, and legal crime, complete with wars of aggression for profit, and all the crimes that spring for from that one, Washington, once enabled to do the contrary, changing sides, authored the following: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html King George: And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit; The Spirit George crushed was the same spirit within The Declaration of Independence, it was the Spirit of 1776. George assembled a conscript army, named The Watermelon Army, reportedly as large as the one he led to enforce liberty, and George took that army into Pennsylvania, a formerly separate and sovereign state, and crushed the second Whiskey Rebellion; whereby the new monetary frauds (Alexander Hamilton for example) were playing the same fraudulent monetary game, moving surplus wealth out of the hands of the people who create it, and into the hands of the people who steal it, and when the victims invent their own replacement currency, again Whiskey, the monetary monopoly enforcers, with their legal enabling documents, crush the competition where ever, and when ever it arises. Just ask Alexander Hamilton; when you meet him in hell - if that is where you are headed. I'm may be going there too. I have yet to see the light - but I do look for it. After some very bad things, whereby the legal criminals, enabled with their enabling legal documents, their licenses to torture, and murder, and even worse crimes, in between Georges test case, crushing "so fatal a spirit" and in between that historical event and the inappropriately named Civil War, which was not civil by any measure, more slaves were created than were set free, unless death is a measure of freedom, hell, slaves didn't have to pay money tax before the war, they paid in work and hide, they were not set free, they just changed masters. Many slaves now are slaves to falsehood, including me. I am setting myself free - the only way to get free - with help. In between those two events, the crushing of the spirit of 1776, and the Not So Civil War, was The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the things I want you to read about. The things I just now tried to clue you in on pertain to The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, relative to current events, as the power struggle continues. On the one side of the power struggle in The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions are the honest productive people represented by James Madison, writing for the Kentucky legal fiction, and Thomas Jefferson writing for the Virginia legal fiction, formerly a separate and sovereign state within a working experimental Federated Democratic Republic, but then a subordinate, lesser, and relatively insignificant power, a subject of, the legal criminals running the Nation State legal fiction; with its plausibly deniable enabling documentation: The Constitution. The opposition to The Constitution also tried to lessen the defeat with The Bill or Rights. How are they working for you now? I'll get a relevant quote from the reference book, and then continue comments. If you have read this far, you will now see the relevance to current events - if you care to see.
Jackson was fully prepared to enforce a tax law. I can find it again, in the source book. Jackson was no stranger to violence as a supposed means of solving problems. In the summer of 1832, Congress passed a new tariff bill. The average rate was reduced to 25 percent of the value of the imported goods. However, rates on iron, woolens, and cottons remained at the 50 percent level. To make matters worse in the Carolinians' eyes, the national treasury expected to enjoy a surplus in the 1830s as a result of the retirement of the debt from the War of 1912. As much as they loathed protection, South Carolinians were willing to be taxed to pay their portion of the war debt. But with debt retirement on the horizon, the tariff became even more unpopular. In short: The Northern power used their influence over the Nation State to skew tax burden onto the Southern power, and the Southern power used their influence within their not-so-sovereign State to write enabling documents that included nullification of the National tax, and included a call to arms to defend against invasion by National troops ordered to enforce the tax. Troops assembled, reportedly, on both sides. Stepping back in time a moment: The Dirty Compromise, in 1788, so as to enable "The Constitution", was a momentary truce between the legal criminals of the North, and the legal criminals of the South. The Nation state enabled one power to annex (steal) the other power. The Constitution ensured a Civil War, that is a documented fact. A Nation State is not a working Federated Democratic Republic. Separate and Sovereign states can succeed from a voluntary union, if they cant' it isn't a voluntary union, it is a Consolidated Nation State, a legal monopoly power. Monopoly powers cannot exist in competition with other powers; competition is the opposite of monopoly. The existence of competition nullifies the existence of a monopoly - by definition. Competition forces quality up, and cost down, even governments, even money. Monopoly forces the opposite, go figure. Separate and Sovereign States define their state of sovereignty, fictionally speaking, as do human beings define their sovereignty, but literally speaking. When you are ordered to obey, and you do obey, even though you know that unqualified obedience is as wrong as the torture, and the mass murder, and the end of the species, that occurs on that path, then you define the opposite of sovereignty. You are a slave; but that isn't nice to know, so ignore it, while you can? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Presidential ChallengeThey are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. Listening to Alex Jones - 06-03-2011 8:06am PDT The guest who spoke the words above is what is known as a whistle blower, a former insider, someone who now sings the warning of past, current, and future plans, and executions of the plans, of what I call the Legal Criminals. Product 1, a no interest loan, produced and maintained by competitive licensed franchises, private businesses (not legal fictions), and denominated in a separate and divided legal monetary unit, a competitive legal currency, can end Legal Crime. I know that it is a bold statement, and to support the validity of the statement, the idea is to begin looking at the power of numbers, such as the power of numbers offered by the guest speaker on the Alex Jones show. Trillions went missing from the dollar unit of legal currency. Think about that some, and then borrow my angle of view. Who cares what the Legal Criminals do with their money; so long as the honest productive people of America are no longer dependent upon the money produced and maintained by the Legal Criminals? Give Cesar that which is his; but don't sell yourself short by doing so, do not cut off your nose to spite your face, don't throw the baby out with the bath water, have a better money already working when the low quality and high cost stuff is phased out. If honest productive people need an honest means by which they can accurately account for their capacity to produce and trade, then make sure you have that necessary medium of exchange, make it, use it, and having done so it won't matter what the Legal Criminals do with their money. Make the dollar better, or failing to have the power to do so, replace it. Product 1 replaces the dollar and does so peacefully, voluntarily, gradually, and offers anyone who insists on "betting on" the value of the dollar all the time in the world to hedge that bet, so as not to be left holding the empty bag once the dollar does what the people who produce the dollar want - devalue. Are you unable to know the truth about the dollar and what the people who produce it want to do with the dollar? Are you brainwashed to a point whereby there is no room in your brain to grasp a world that manages to exist with something better than a money that is designed to devalue over time? Can you not imagine into being a money that does not devalue over time, or heaven forbid, a money that is designed to gain value over time? If the people running the dollar can make trillions disappear, more money than most people can imagine, what else can they do - what is the actual measure of their power? Product 1 allows the reader an opportunity to grasp the measure of the power that is commanded by The Legal Criminals, and Product 1 shows the reader where the power comes from; the power that The Legal Criminals command is the same power produced by the honest productive Americans. Pull the rug out from under those inglorious bastards. Product 1 is just, only just, a single monetary instrument, a no interest loan, whereby honest productive people (known credit power: high FICO score) borrow from their own capacity to produce surplus wealth, and the cost of producing and maintaining the "paper work" is paid back with Product 2, while Product 1 is designed to retire all the dollar denominated home (and business property) mortgages in America. How much money, how much economic (political/economic) power is the power in all the home and business property mortgages in America? Assuming roughly 100 million mortgages, and assuming an average of 100 thousand "dollars" (or equivalent in some other currency other than the dollar) the number is: 100,000,000 (100 million or 8 zeros) 100,000 (100 thousand or 5 zeros) 8 zeros adds to 5 zeros to make 13 zeros which is: 10,000,000,000,000 What is that? Look at the quotes already quoted above: They are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. 1. They are running around the world making sure that the Chinese buy more Treasuries. How much power is required if the goal is to enforce a global legal money monopoly? Product 1 = 10,000,000,000,000 How much power is that much power? 2. Trillions went missing... How much power is no longer your power, and where did all that power go, after it "went missing"? 3. Much too much money to "just" make the Rothschild rich. Money is not the point. Power is the point. If you order the destruction of Iran (or America), will anyone obey you, even if you show them a bank account balance with 12 zeros on it? 4. They are re-engineering...government. There is an obvious (even if you don't want to see it) effort to shift the global legal monopoly money power (now known as The Dollar Hegemony, and The World Reserve Currency) from the dollar unit of currency to something else, from America, to some place else, I think they are going to China, you can guess yourself, I am not an insider, you may be one, I can't know where, you may know were, the point is that it is obvious that America is on the Bust schedule, and China is on the Boom schedule, you can open your eyes to see it, and then understand it, and then begin to work at divorcing yourself from it. How can you if your power to see is stolen from you through falsehood, and how can you act if your power to act is stolen from you with the money fraud "business cycle"? Product 1 allows you to measure the power struggle in such a way as to begin seeing a competitive path out of the mire. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ If you think that you must have the dollar, or perish, then I think you are suffering from brain washing, as I was, as I am no longer. How do you think I managed to invent Joe's Law, Product 1, and Product 2, despite all the power that suppresses original thought? Would you recognize a solution to a problem if you saw one, and if not, why not? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive people of America, Few of you even know what to ask a person who can represent you; and I know this from personal experience, decades of searching for someone who could represent me, and finding none. Now, you may respond, that sounds like a challenge. This is my basic point. You are challenged, and what do you do with that challenge? Do you shrink, retreat, hide, and shiver? No, you are an honest productive American, and as such, you meet the challenge, and you overcome the competition, and you raise the bar, and you hit the ball out of the park, and you set the competition scrambling to gain advantage as competition forces higher quality and lower cost. So, then, how can YOU explain the total lack of any presidential challenger from sea to shining sea? Can you look at yourself in the mirror and honestly claim that there is one? You may be suffering from delusion, and if so, are you capable of setting aside hubris long enough to entertain the slightest realization that it may be a good time to test your knowledge, to work some, to ask one question, just in case you are not as overpowering in competitive understanding as you have led yourself to believe? I'm leading into a method by which my On-Line Presidential Campaign solicits, seeks, demands, and offers competitive debate among any one, or two, or more, of the honest productive Americans who could, by chance, employ a representative, one who represents honest productive Americans, in their government, run by them, as they employ the government they choose, to accomplish the goals they demand to be accomplished, or they will find someone who will accomplish the goals that they have chosen to be the goals they will accomplish with their government. There you have the challenge, before you, if you are an honest productive American, and you seek a Presidential Challenger, one who will answer your questions, so as to afford you the vital information that you require, as you search for someone who can, and will, represent you, or else: you will find, by asking questions, gaining knowledge, someone who will do the job that you demand to be done. I stood before the electorate, during a very brief campaign for a seat in The House of Representatives, and I learned a few things during that experience. I learned, for example, that all people are almost identical in mind and body, and the few differences among people are almost insignificant; with few exceptions. Almost everyone wants happiness; and almost everyone will do that which is necessary to move closer to happiness and to move further away from misery, no matter what words are used in place of those two words. A. Happiness B. Misery The few exceptions include some people whose concept of happiness is the happiness they move toward when they inflict misery upon innocent victims; inflicting misery on babies, children, young men and women, honest productive men and women, and old men and women makes them happy. That is a significant difference. When someone like that says something along the lines of that which is to be done in the pursuit of happiness, it may be a good idea to understand what that person means when that person says those things. A. Spreading Democracy B. Defending Freedom You may want to pay closer attention to the actual intentions that your future representative might be working toward when your future representative declares to you, that they will spread democracy and that they will defend freedom. You may want to sharpen your wit, just in case, in case someone in government is the exception to the rules. When he, or she, says that the sky is blue, for example, you may want to get a second opinion. I am offering a means by which you can spar, or practice, or warm-up, or sharpen, or a way in which you can gain a competitive edge, so as to be in better shape, so as to ensure that you do things that moves you closer to your goal. Now, consider, the opposite. I am also an honest productive American, and as such, I am working the same path as almost everyone else, with few exceptions. What happens if one of the exceptions challenges me? Can you see a possible explanation for the total absence of any challenge to my viewpoints? Will you be able to understand, to conceptualize, and to know what a representative of the honest productive American people says, if you ever find one; presuming any one of the honest productive American people are even looking for one? Who is willing to step up to the plate? You have found one, if you have read this far. Now look in the mirror - please. What do you see? Is that voice silent? Why? If you disagree with something I wrote, including my explanations of two liberating financial products, or my viewpoints on politics, or economics, then consider saying something, challenge me, and challenge your own understanding - just in case you may need to know better. Look at who runs your government; who chose them? Why? Are they stupid; or are professional liars, cheats, and criminals in demand, wanted, needed, desired, so as to move closer to the goal? What is the goal when the employees keep on hiring criminals? Are you now inspired to crawl back under your rock? I'm curious enough to ask. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
06-08-2011 Anyone, Listening to Alex Jones and Jesse The Body Ventura. Jesse has a point of view. Alex has a point of view. People who target either person, and ignore the point of view, are people who confess their intentions to target personalities, not viewpoints. What about the points of view? One single constant point of view can be seen as a principle. Look at one, see one, and see nothing else, for a moment - please. One single constant point of view, one principle: Unchallenged Obedience Unchallenged Obedience See it. That is a principle. That is a single thing, a single mind set, a single point of view. See it, alone, and realize it, alone, as one single principle. Now, for no other reason that boredom, having spent an eternity of time viewing, seeing, knowing, and realizing, the one single myopic principle of Unchallenged Obedience, look, please, at one other viewpoint, and do so for a fraction of a second, and do not look at anything other than Unchallenged Obedience for more than than once fraction of a second. I just heard: July 3rd,4rth, and 5th, a no buying gas, and a no flying protest. I will get back to that soon. For now, please, return to the one myopic, single, constant, consistent, viewpoint, the one, principle, Unchallenged Obedience viewpoint, and do so for an imaginary eternity of time, as all human life obeys that single principle for the entire span of human existence from the first human being to the last anywhere in the entire Universe, and for one single second of time, a competitive viewpoint emerges within that time span, and then the one second of alternative, adaptive, competitive, challenge-to-the-one-myopic-viewpoint vanishes forever. 1. Unchallenged Obedience (99.99999999999% of human time) 2. Not #1 (.000000000000001% of human time - one second, from one human, and then a return to Unchallenged Obedience forevermore) I offer this angle of view so as to illustrate a principle, and to do so by way of stark comparison, by way of seeing one thing, and then next to the one thing is placed another thing, so as to realize how one thing compares to another thing. How does anyone, ever, know, or realize, or understand, or conceptualize, or believe, right from wrong? If there is only one thing, then there is no way to know right from wrong, the one thing is the only thing, therefore there is no possible way to know right from wrong. Once another thing exists, in time and space, a viewpoint, from a person, can then compare one thing relative to another thing, and this is the principle, this is challenge, this is competition, this is the constitution of, the construction of, the creation of, and then the exercise of, willful choice. If the single myopic viewpoint is Unchallenged Obedience, if that is chosen, it remains a choice, when the physical fact of existence presents alternatives, such as the illustrated alternative to which my words intend to convey as such: 1. Unchallenged Obedience 2. Competition There are two things, not one. The idea, at this point, is to look at Unchallenged Obedience, and see it, for what it is, and it is false, it is a lie, it is a deception, it is not competitive, it is not right, it is not even possible, as such a viewpoint, no matter how popular the belief in it may be, it is not humanly possible in any state of existence, at any time, since a single person, as a human being, has a competitive viewpoint, by definition, by factual reality, by the fact of existing, the single human being challenges obedience to the false idea of Unchallenged Obedience. A person may be forced to obey a tax law, for example, as one person presents another person with one, single, myopic, dictate, demand, and order to pay the tax, no choice, pay the tax, there are no other choices, pay the tax, and the person pays the tax, because there is no other choice, at that moment in time. Path A: Pay the tax Path B: Pay the tax No choice, the facts prove, there is no choice, there is only Unchallenged Obedience, at that time, at that place, as one person gains power at the expense of another person, and therefore, the precedence is set, proof positive, Unchallenged Obedience exists, you are then unable to consider any other option, Unchallenged Obedience does exist, it is, all other options shall not be questioned. There is only one. Unchallenged Obedience There is no other. Really? Who is fooling who? Look here: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html That is the "official" version of The Constitution (according to whoever authorized and then published that Web Page). AMENDMENT XIV Who supports the one myopic viewpoint, the Unchallenged Obedience viewpoint, and by what lie does that person manage that support? Have I lost you? I can offer two, reasonable, just, equitable, and liberating challenges to the lie of Unchallenged Obedience, for you to consider, alone, in your individual time, in your individual space, as you are offered these two challenges to the false viewpoint knowable as Unchallenged Obedience, such as the illustrated case above, quoted as: "shall not be questioned" in the "official" version of the false "law of the land". 1. Trial by Jury http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html 2. Equitable Commerce http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf I am offering three things to see, you can see three things, and you can compare three things, as three things challenge your current viewpoint. Blind, Unchallenged, Obedience, "shall not be questioned" is 1 thing. Trial by Jury not only questions Obedience, Trial by Jury authorizes, by law, each individual person, with the power to nullify any law. Do you understand that concept? A. Blind obedience to the people who enforce The Constitution, as those enforcers choose to interpret The Constitution the way they choose to interpret The Constitution. B. Any Juror sitting on any Jury nullifies any example of intended enforcement by any enforcer who tries to enforce their interpretation of The Constitution. Do you see the power at play? A lawful enforcer of The Constitution intends to enforce his interpretation of The Constitution upon a targeted "law breaker", and any one Juror, on any Jury, has more power than any enforcer of The Constitution, as the attempt to enforce The Constitution is nullified by the one, single, Juror, who can be anyone on any jury. You may think that my words are false, and you may want to hold onto your blind obedience viewpoint with some measure of sycophantic fever, I suppose, while the data, not me, the data supports my viewpoint. A single Juror has the legal power to nullify any interpretation made by any hired enforcer of any law in the land where Trial by Jury is a working legal power. Call me stupid, if it makes you feel better at this moment in your use of human life. If you are ever punished by some hired enforcer of "the law of the land" and you were not afforded the opportunity of having your punishment nullified by one of 12 people who are randomly chosen among all of your peers, then that is what happens to you, as Trial by Jury doesn't work for you - too bad for you. You are punished. To bad for you. Added to that Trial by Jury challenge to the myopic unchallenged obedience viewpoint, shared by millions, I place in front of you a second, and even more powerful, challenge to that lie of blind obedience; which is blind obedience to falsehood. In one group there exists an army of people fueled by lies, parroting lies, using lies to injure innocent people for profit, or for fun, and even people believing in the lies, based upon the single myopic principle, which is false, which is Unchallenged Obedience, an army, a zombie army, a brainwashed army of sycophantic psychopaths and sociopaths, raining evil down upon their targeted victims, perpetually, and unchallenged by some measure, since they do exist, they do command that power of falsehood, and they do commit their legal crimes, and the measure of their victims include the screams of the tortured, and the piles, and piles, and piles of legally murdered victims, and in the challenging group people do challenge the myopic blind obedience lie. One group: Unchallenged Obedience One Challenger (group) Trial by Jury Another Challenger (group) Equitable Commerce You may have a hard time shedding all the falsehood that covers up the other Challengers to the Unchallenged Obedience group. You can read the link, or you can depend upon me to place that challenge in front of you, in such a way as to afford you the opportunity to appraise it accurately. The FED has the legal license to borrow from the Good Faith and Credit of The American people (the tax payers), and the people commanding that legal license have borrowed trillions, spent trillions, and the result of their expenses is bankruptcy. They say that the honest productive people are bankrupt, they say that the Good Faith in Credit of The American people is tarnished, discredited, lower in power, as a direct result of the failure to invest borrowed money economically. Who borrowed from who? Who is bankrupt? Who earns Good Faith and Credit? Who are the debtors? Who are the creditors? Why do the victims believe in falsehoods that target them, punish them, and then make them pay for their own punishment? If you are told to dig your own grave, jump in it, and then fill in the hole on top of you, do you do that too? If you are told to dig faster, do you do that too? How is that different from you lending someone money, that you earn, and then the borrower tells you that you owe them for the money they borrowed and wasted? You produce surplus wealth. They borrow that from you. They spend that borrowed money. They then tell you that you are broke, and that you owe them the entire sum of money they have borrowed from you, and on top of that, they say you owe them interest on the money they borrowed from you? You claim that I am stupid? Really? The Unchallenged Obedience group supports the idea that the Good Faith and Credit of The American people is bankrupt; as a result of the actions perpetrated by a few people who have the single legal power to borrow from the honest productive American people. What do you think is the obvious challenge to that myopic, false, Unchallenged Obedience group, viewpoint? What happens if each honest productive American person, proven to be a powerful force of production, proven to have earned Good Faith and Credit, has more power than those few people at The FED? The same thing works in economy as it does in law. Trial by Jury gives each person more power than the employees of The People. A member of a Jury, in a Trial by Jury, has more legal power than any law enforcer anywhere within the legal reach of a government that has a working Trial by Jury legal process. What does Equitable Commerce prove? Equitable Commerce proves that the same legal power of Trial by Jury, in law enforcement, is proven to work in economy, as each person is afforded as much, or more, power than any hired person running the government, as each person has the legal power to borrow from their own, well earned, good faith and credit. You can see the world from the point of view that goes unchallenged, or you can challenge that lie. Back to the proposed protest in July: Alex Jones and Jesse Ventura spoke of a protest in July. I can offer a similar future event, I've done so, and I will do the same again. One person, me, or anyone, publishes a pending date in the future, on the calender, and on that date the idea is to be liberated, on that date, the people agreeing to be liberated on that date, declare that they will be liberated on that date, and that is what happens on that date, so long as enough people agree to be liberated on that date, and the date can be moved sooner, or the date can be moved later, depending upon the rate by which the numbers required volunteer to be liberated on that date. If the date by which The People will liberate themselves is July 4th 2011, then that is the date by which The People will liberate themselves. How many of The People are needed to constitute a sufficient power in opposition to the one myopic Unchallenged Obedience power? You can offer a rough number. I will offer my opinion. How about 60% of the population? I can be much more precise with the actual requirements of the power that is needed. Honest productive Americans have to be the people who will constitute those people who have the power to liberate themselves, precisely those people. Liberated people are people who voluntarily associated with each other, equitably, as they produce much more than they consume, as the supply of surplus wealth reaches a higher than ever recorded amount of surplus wealth, and those liberated people then have the power to liberate themselves, and those people then challenge the legal criminal power, and the challenge is peaceful, and the challenge is voluntary, and the challenge over-powers the single myopic Unchallenged Obedience group, because those people decide to command the power they produce in that way, on that day. One person picks a date. Another person agrees to that date. More people join in on the liberty day effort. Many more people agree. The agreement is nothing more, and nothing less, than an agreement to challenge the Unchallenged Obedience group, to pledge honorably, to no longer be among that group, on that future date, when enough honest productive Americans will no longer be perpetually punished by that legal criminal group. While that future date approaches there may be many offerings of viewpoints as to what will happen on that date. I can offer, for example, that competition in money markets is a necessary thing to allow on that date, or even better, have competition in money markets working well before that date, since competition in legal money markets will slow down the flow of power from the honest productive Americans as that power flows to the legal criminals. Legal competition in money markets will stop that flow of power from the honest productive people, and that power will no longer flow to those legal criminals as a result of allowing legal competition in money markets - and the result will be such that the honest productive group of people will then produce an astonishing amount of surplus wealth as that group becomes so much more powerful than any legal crime group, that legal crime will no longer be profitable. You can challenge blind obedience as you see fit, within your own power capacity to do so. Good luck, alone. The single, myopic, sycophantic, psychopathic, sociopathic, pathological, despotic, monopolistic, unchallenged, obedient, false, viewpoint is rendered powerless, unprofitable, by competition. Forms of competition that render the legal crime power powerless include the Trial by Jury legal power, and legal money competition - both challenge and render the legal crime group powerless. You can know this, and work with this, and if more people know this, and more people work with this information, liberty day will arrive on the day it does, without fanfare, or on a new scheduled day of celebration. Legal crime currently pays trillions; don't be confused as to why. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Predatory Capitalism and War for Oil Anyone (except those whose interest is willful injury to the innocent), My offering today concerns a personal episode, one of those lucid dreams, involving a coalescence of perception into one pointed viewpoint; as if a vital piece finally finds its way into the puzzle, and the picture is suddenly unmistakably obvious. I thought, and now I think, and nothing has yet to challenge this new thought competitively as yet, that the legal criminals will eventually monopolize the insurance industry. In order to convey to the reader this new viewpoint I can employ specific data such as the link at the top of the page, which constitutes a welcome flow of power from someone who earned that power through his closely connected experiences with the legal crime network; the network known by many names. 1. The Dollar Hegemony 2. The Military Industrial Complex 3. Wall Street 4. The New World Order 5. Legal Crime Before the reader turns away active, and willful, control of his, or her, personal command of thought, consider, please, focusing attention on specific people who breath air, wear cloths, eat food, and depend, as you do, on their own personal power to survive in this, our, lifetime; as we, the living, still manage to live. Add a personal interest in viewing these things; walk in their shoes, figuratively speaking; make it personal. In particular, there are people who have more power than you, and there are people who have less power than you, and on that scale the more powerful people are fewer, and the less powerful people are more numerous, and the scale ends up looking like a pyramid, and I am asking you to look closer, for now, at the most powerful people, and look as closely as possible, so close, within your own power, to accurately identify the uppermost powerful people on the planet, as if your intent was to accurately identify the one most powerful person - and then try to be that person for an imaginary length of time, so as to better understand power. Pyramids on Reality Television (helping to understand the monopoly power structure): 1. Survivor 2. America's Most Wanted 3. American Idol 4. America's Got Talent 5. 2012 Election Cycle The top one is competitively more powerful, by merit, compared to the next best one, by some measure of some kind. The measure may be fixed, false, rigged, predetermined, but the concept remains obvious. This is not that difficult of a concept to know; and it is a useful perception. The above intends to employ the principle understanding of individual, competitive, adaptive, advantage, or leverage, toward the accurate identification of the most dangerous threat to the human species - perhaps not something on your own personal top 10 laundry list of things to do, but something of value none the less. Quote from the link: It [War] was to protect oil. You do not have the power to send an all volunteer army, navy, airforce, marines, private corporate mercenary soldiers, support people, food, shelter, clothing, bombs, missiles, truck loads of 100 dollar bills stacked on pallets by the tons, torturers, and mass murderers, on aggressive wars for profit, be your goal oil, be your goal a physical form of power used to back up a fraudulent legal currency monopoly, or be your goal, in your mind, a serial killing for the shear joy of watching massive numbers of innocent people suffer miserably on their ways to early deaths, stacked up onto piles, and piles, of commingled funeral pyres. Place the most innocent on that pyramid top. Your goal may be simple: to get the most power flowing from anywhere, and everywhere, to you; if you were, accurately measured as, the most powerful one alive. You are not. Neither am I. The goal that is chosen is as competitive a choice as is the individual who commands the power to move toward the chosen goal. Pick the wrong goal, and you may then be the less powerful competitor, for failure to pick the more competitive goal, and then investing all your power digging holes, and then filling them back up. Know the person moving toward the goal, know the actions perpetrated by the person moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be a liar moving toward the goal, and listen to the words spoken by the person who is proven to be ignorant moving toward the goal, and the goal may become obvious; despite the falsehoods, deceptions, threats of violence, and acts of willful violence perpetrated perpetually upon the innocent victims as those legal criminals move toward their chosen goals. Which immediately next goal would you willfully move toward if your long term goal was to move up one more level on that power pyramid that does exist in actual reality; presuming to place your viewpoint in the shoes of someone near the top? It [War] was to protect oil. I am now here to inform you of a very competitive answer. Those at the top of the power structure have a few obvious chores to accomplish, and maintain, at the top of their chosen power structure. 1. Move power from those who create power to those who are at the top. 2. Use the power, that has been moved, to keep the power flowing in that direction. Failure to accomplish those goals will result in two obvious possible results. 1. The people who create power have more power, as less power moves from them, and less power moves to those who move power from those who create power to those who are at the top. The Pyramid flattens out. 2. Someone else moves power from those who create power, to those who move power to the top, power moved from those who create power. Same pyramid, you are not at the top. Another quote: They love war, they live this business because it keeps them in power. Competitive methods by which power flows from those who create power to those who move that power: 1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding) 2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding) 3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment) 4. Voluntary Banking (Saving) 5. Insurance Please consider using a few examples of actual accounts of power currently flowing from those who create power to those places where power flows; from the many to the few. 1. Involuntary Taxation (Monopoly government funding) What happens to you if you decide to stop sending your power to the people who are now confessing their crimes of torture and mass murder for profit? You have forms to fill out, papers to sign, and failure to do so results in specific measures of things done to you, as you are innocent of torture, and you are innocent of mass murder, and you want to remain innocent of those crimes, so you decide to stop lending political support, stop lending psychological support, stop sending physical support, stop sending material support, to people who are, without any doubt, lying, torturing, and mass murdering, pathological serial killers, sycophants, sociopaths, and psychopathic legal criminals, by their well documented deeds, as well as their well documented falsehoods, and their well documented acts, as the screams of the innocent dying perpetuate - you stop empowering them - what happens to you? 2. Banking Fraud (Monopoly government funding) What happens to you if you find your economical situation turning from a powerful capacity to produce surplus wealth, well above your ability to consume the wealth that you produce, to a situation whereby your power to produce wealth reduces below your current rate of consumption? What happens if you need to borrow from your own good faith and credit; and you find that someone else has borrowed from you, and wasted your power, and someone now tells you that you owe them for the money they borrowed from you, and they say that you owe them interest on the money they borrowed from you, as they take more, and more, and more of your power, and they give that power to their closest associates, and they raise their pay rate, and they reward their most effective associates with bonuses, and bailouts, and then, if their investments do pay off, they hide those profits from you, while they still demand you to pay them for the money they borrowed from you, and they still demand you to pay them interest on the money they borrowed from your capacity, and your power, to produce good faith and credit, and surplus wealth in abundance - what happens to you - what do you do about what happens to you? You give them more when they demand more? How does that end; for lack of a competitive alternative? You will not find a more accurate explanation of Monopoly Banking Fraud than the paragraph above; and those who support those legal crimes will attack me personally, so as to willfully help perpetuate that very big lie. The war games are not for oil; they are for anything that will perpetuate the monopoly banking fraud. 3. Voluntary Taxation (Investment) What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an ability to have a three digit phone number to call in case of fire, injury, accident, or any case of helplessness, or emergency, where you really can use an emergency response, during that unfortunate event? What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an effort to collect enough funds to accomplish a noble goal, such as charity for the poor, or aid to the sick, or even finance for studies reaching for human cures to human disasters? What do you call your willful choice to send money to a central location so as to help support an armed force of defenders who are ready and able to respond to an attack by a powerful criminal army of aggressors seeking profit at your expense? What do you call a willful choice to send money to a central location to help build roads, hospitals, libraries, schools, and even businesses that offer shares in their capacity to produce more surplus wealth than they consume? 4. Voluntary Banking (Saving) That is against the law. If you do find a place to send your power off-shore, out of the country, you may be guilty of money laundering, or some such legal crime. What do you call an effort on your part to secure your own personal supply of surplus wealth; to keep it as valuable as the day you earned it, on into the foreseeable future? 5. Insurance I am going to reach for another quote before addressing number 5 on that laundry list. George Washington would not claim us today. If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not the path that moves the power produced by honest productive Americans, by way of deceit, by way of threats of horrible violence, and by way of horrible violence upon the innocent, to the legal criminals who have a diametrically opposed goal in mind. George Washington was a turn coat, from the goal of liberty, which is the best insurance against the worst loss known to mankind, to date, as George Washington turned his coat toward aggressive wars for profit; and he confessed that very thing. If the idea is to insure against loss; then the path to that goal is not repeating the same path that moves in the opposite direction, over, and over, and over again, as if this one time, a different result will occur. Notice in that Real News Report how the slow learner finally realized that Ronald Regan was the opposite of the false front that was projected in front of his true color? That is the same old, tired, game, used by the nationalists (Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington when he turned his coat) as they projected the false front of Federalism over their true color, so as to cover up their true legal crimes. The slow learner has a lot of learning yet to do; despite his extensive experience, hard earned, I suspect, connected deep into legal crime. On to my story, for you. Legal crime, the pyramid structure, annexes, or accumulates, or takes-over, or recruits, all competitors into one amalgamated whole. This is not an unfamiliar story. In Alexander Hamilton's (and his minion George Washington's) day the monopolists annexed the sovereign and separate, competitive, state governments, into one national government, one consolidated government, one indivisible union, and the punishment for failure to obey, was, and is, aggressive violence perpetrated upon you, for profit of the perpetrators, or their employers. What happens when you choose to employ other people to work toward your own injury, and you employ the same people to injure your loved ones - what does that make you in fact, how do you measure up precisely as a competitor, to say, someone seeking liberty? George Washington conscripted a national army and invaded Pennsylvania to enforce the legal money monopoly power, and later, Abraham Lincoln invaded the southern states to enforce the slavery of the slavers, and enforce the slavery of the slaves, in the south. Honest Abe had the north covered. George Washington's network of slave traders could not allow a competitive money to exist, which would have forced George Washington's network of slave traders to produce higher quality and lower cost money, and thereby reduce their power to conduct aggressive wars for profit, at will. Abraham Lincoln and his network of slave traders could not allow the competitive slave traders in the south to exist, failure to enforce the involuntary union would have forced the northern slave traders to compete with the southern slave traders, for higher quality, and lower cost enslavement, as slaves would vote with their feet, within their power to do so, loving, or leaving, their chains of enslavement in one place, and moving to a better place. Slaves running from low quality enslavement in the south may run, and find refuge up north, working subsistence wages in industry; while subsistence wage workers up north could run down south, to escape that form of slavery, to replace the slaves flowing up north, working competitive wages in agriculture - if competition was allowed, which it wasn't, and that is the point. Insurance is the same thing. Which company offers the highest quality insurance, at the lowest cost, while competition forces that move from low quality to high quality, and high cost to low cost? What happens when the number of insurance providers reduce from the number in existence now, down to three, then two, and then an effective monopoly? Why call one thing two names; when both things are the same thing? Republicans Democrats Legal Criminals |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest productive Americans, The new generation will replace the old one; and I'm not offering opinion here, so you can park your ego if you feel like arguing with someone. Among that new generation there will be honest productive Americans; and there will also be among them those who seek to gain the power produced by the honest productive Americans. Do you think that the new generation of honest productive Americans will be more successful in avoiding the transfer of their power to the group who seek to gain that power? If that last sentence is difficult to conceptualize I can offer a measure of help; if you want to ask or answer that last question. Look at the Debt Clock: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Do you think that the next generation of honest productive Americans will be more successful than the last generation at avoiding the flow of power that is created by the honest productive Americas to those who steal it by deceit, by threats of violence, and by actual acts of torturous, and mass murderous violence, such as the totals of power being transferred on that Debt Clock web page? Do you think that the next generation of honest productive Americans will slow down the transfers of power on that Debt Clock web page, stop that transfer of power in that direction, and then will the next generation of Americans keep the power they earn instead of having the power they earn stolen as that Debt Clock records, in that way? My words may appear to be opinionated to you. I can see that my words are merely factual. The question has nothing to do with my opinion. Do you think that the next generation will figure out how better to avoid having the power they earn taken? If you think so, then my next question is why, and what happens to cause that reversal of human fortune? Will the next generation be empowered with a higher sense of moral conscience; and therefore less willing to be stupefied by the legal crime class of modern day despotic slave masters? I'm guessing that the new generation will face, at least, a more accurate assessment of their supposed superiors, and empowered, therefore, to avoid the mistakes made by their predecessors. Here is my inspirational link for the day: http://lewrockwell.com/north/north992.html In simple terms: The source of wealth (purchasing power) is the honest productive American people; by which the legal crime class gain the power that they currently command, as that power has no other source from which it can be acquired. Knowing that fact: the concept of borrowing must accurately identify the person, or the people, who have no power, the ones who receive the power from those who have the power. The legal crime class borrow from the honest productive American people. How then are the honest productive American people made to believe that they owe something to the borrowers? How does that work? How are the people who are accurately accountable as the source of wealth made to believe that they owe the legal criminals payments resulting from loans taken out by the legal criminals? The legal criminals are the people who have borrowed the power to purchase from the honest productive American people; how then are the honest productive American people made to think that they owe those borrowers something more, on top of what the legal criminals already borrowed, more is due to flow to those legal criminals, from the honest productive Americans, supposedly, because the legal criminals borrowed the power to purchase? How can honest productive people be that stupid? Is it me? You earn a living. Your work produces wealth. Someone then borrows from you that wealth that you create. Got that so far? Now that person comes back to you years later and demands from you payments on the money that they borrowed from you. Do you see a problem yet? Then that person tells you that you owe them interest on the money that they borrowed from you. If you are reading this and you wonder, for a fraction of a second, if what I'm telling you is true, then there is hope for the next generation. Here, is a toast, a salute, to hope, for the next generation - from me to you. Following the money includes a look into C.A.F.R (Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports) - if you are at all interested in knowing the facts documented by the legal criminals who continue to steal the power that is created by the honest productive people of America - perhaps some day you may need that power for something good, something other than financing torture and mass murder. Good luck. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones 06-16-2011 Honest productive Americans, When the official professors of high finance begin to report the facts to you, please, stand yourself on moral principle, and then see the facts from that solid foundation. Since WWII the legal criminals have been borrowing money from honest productive Americans and claiming that honest productive American's owe the legal criminals instead of telling the truth. Get that clear, so as to understand the truth about the current reports that concern the supposed economic collapse pending. You must see this factually. Where does surplus wealth come from? Is that too far ahead, did I go over your head, is that last question not well understood, in context? How about the following principled question, that is founded upon moral principle: What is surplus wealth? You must know this, if you want to uncover the truth about the current situation whereby the legal criminals are being uncovered publicly; where once the legal criminals were well hidden from the average Joe and average Jane honest productive American. What is surplus wealth? Once you answer that question you will begin to see what the legal criminals target, you will begin to see the prize that the legal criminals are interested in stealing from you. Once you answer that question you will begin to have a clear, moral, foundation, from which to begin unraveling the crimes of the century. Surplus wealth is the amount of wealth that is left over after wealth is consumed. To illustrate the measure of surplus wealth you can look at the Pyramids in Egypt. The people who built the Pyramids in Egypt had enough surplus wealth to spend, enough of a greater supply of wealth after expenses, to built those Pyramids, and they didn't have modern mechanical advantages whereby human labor is much more efficient compared to ancient Egypt. Today there is enough surplus wealth to build cities under ground, and to travel to the moon. Now that you have an answer for the question of "What is surplus wealth" you can now answer the next question that may have gone over your head: Where does surplus wealth come from? The answer to that question is the same answer that the legal criminals must answer so as to empower the legal criminals with a target, a mark, and an exploitable object in their cross hairs, as they seek to gain control over surplus wealth. Legal criminals have a vested interest in knowing the answer to that question, as they seek to gain control of surplus wealth, they must know where surplus wealth comes from, so the question is not specious, the question is not irrelevant, and the accurate answer to the question will empower you with a greater understanding of the current situation; as the legal criminals continue to cause the current economic collapse that is pending. Surplus wealth comes from the honest productive people who create more than they consume; and that is a factual measure of reality - not open to debate. I have answered the question factually; like answering the question of where does sunlight come from: The Sun. You can argue; but what would be the point of arguing? You are targeted by the legal criminals, and they have already stolen from you, by claiming that you are borrowing from them, when they are actually borrowing from you. They claim that you owe them money. How are you made to believe that you owe them money? What am I talking about? Is this guy named Joe Kelley a nut job? Look at the facts that they report to you: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Do you really believe that the people who have borrowed from your power to create surplus wealth (the good faith and credit of the American tax payers) are now the beneficiaries of your future ability to create more surplus wealth? They borrow from you and then they turn around and claim that you owe them; and you owe them interest on top of the principle that they borrowed from you? Really? And you think I am a kook? Who is wearing the tin hat? If you have looked into Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports and you are confused by it, then are you in a position to claim that I am stupid? Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports is one more, of many, scams, all connected in a Network of scams, and if all of those scams, connected to that one Network, can be seen a hegemonic whole, you can then know it better as The Dollar Hegemony. The connecting medium is the single legal monopoly money; and it exists because all competition is against the law. Once a competitor is allowed to compete, by law, all those scams vanish - and I can explain, if you remain confused, and if you no longer want to be confused, if you now see that you can no longer afford to be confused. It is not confusing, it is easy to understand. You must first stand on a solid foundation. What is surplus wealth? Where does surplus wealth come from? How is surplus wealth measured? If criminals (with or without badges) enforce one single method of measuring surplus wealth, such as The Dollar, what do you think those criminals will do with that Power (legal or not)? They will cook the books, they have, and the measure of their crimes is literally documented by following that money. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
When the law break in Bankrobber Who owes who? Anyone aware of the US Government's real financial situation knows that time is running out. The Government has $15.5 trillion in admitted debts but those debts, when calculated under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), or 'honest accounting', is over $70 trillion. $70 trillion divided by 300 million+ Americans works out to $233,000 per person in US Federal Government debt and obligations. Or nearly $1 million per family of four. Who is everyone? I, all alone, know even more. You may not. This may be your lucky day. Are you sitting down? The people who are commonly believed to be the authorities are in fact criminals, and it is factual, and it is well recorded, and therefore there is a wide gap between common belief and reality. The criminals who are pretending to be the authorities, can be called legal criminals, so as to identify them, for who they are, and for what they are, because of what they do, and because of the lies they tell. The legal criminals run a scam, or pyramid scheme, or fraud, which amounts to an extortion racket, and they get away with it because their victims are fooled into owning a false belief. Almost everyone harbors, or owns, a small portion of the false belief, playing their part in the ongoing extortion racket. It may be a good idea, for the victims, not for the legal criminals, to know, and then accurately communicate, the principles and interests involved in this terrible, and rapidly worsening, torturous, and mass murderous, serial killing, lie. The first principle that must be understood, made real in the minds of mankind, is the fact that honest productive people are the source of wealth, or surplus wealth, from which all measures of progress are produced. It is not possible to progress by telling lies, lies are counter productive, as the victims of lies are sent digging holes and filling the same holes back in - many times with tortured bodies buried underground. Two links for you to peruse, or speed read, or glance over, or ignore, suffice to illustrate the concept of how lies are counter productive. Link 1: Wall Street (people) boom the BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION (a targeted economy) Link 2: Wall Street (people) boom the NAZI REVOLUTION (a targeted economy) All sides are boomed just before a major conflict or World War, and the false belief projected by the legal criminals is such that the targeted victims are made to own the idea that these events are random, accidental, or products of misguided good intentions. Get up, go to a mirror, look in the mirror, and own your part of the false belief. Do you own the belief that these past and future events are the products of misguided good intentions, as you may want to believe that lie, since the alternative is too terrible, too evil, and too much for your soul, and your mind, to bear today, or tomorrow, or next week? Too bad for you. The people who hide behind the name Wall Street, or The Federal Reserve System, or The Dollar Hegemony, or U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), or whatever name they hide behind, have borrowed more money from the Good Faith and Credit of the Honest Productive American People, and the sum of that new loan is not front page news, but it is a known, accountable, an amount of money, purchasing power, and the number of zeros on that loan amount is more than 12. 1,000,000,000,000 The loan, borrowed from the Good Faith and Credit of the Honest Productive American People, over 1 Trillion units of money, denominated in Dollars, will buy things, secret things, and then the borrowers will claim that the lenders owe them money. That is called crime. That is legal. That is therefore legal crime, and The Honest Productive American People are some of the people on the list of victims that will suffer pain, and will suffer terror, and will suffer torture, and will be murdered, hundreds, thousands, and millions of serial killings, facts, on the ground, and in the ground, to ignore, or face first hand, soon. Ignore at your own cost, the bill will be due, unless the victims wise up. If you are reading this, you can no longer say that you didn't know. All that is needed is numbers of people refusing to be victims, and the trillions of units of power will be rendered powerless, and this is an inverse proportion. More numbers of clued in victims constitute a reduction in the power abused by those criminals. Cut their credit card, but be warned, a competitive replacement legal monetary product system must be in place before the criminal one is rejected. Make, and maintain, a replacement, and that will be an effective end of the legal crime regime of terror, torture, and mass murder. Failure will be costly, mark my words. 06-17-2011 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to The Alex Jones show 06-17-2011 I hear bad news ahead and what I don't hear is a specific report on what must happen so as to avoid bad news ahead. I've written before, and I will write again, that a date can be set in the future, 2012, July 4th, for example, and a number of people joining an honorable agreement is added to the date, and on that date, if enough people agree to the honorable agreement, then that day will be a new day of liberty. What must happen on that day? The number of people agreeing to liberate themselves from the bad news ahead must regain control of their power to employ their honest productivity, their ability to produce an abundance of surplus wealth must be regained, and the connection by which that power is stolen must be severed on that day. Why would anyone reading my words find any argument against it; unless their living depends upon the legal crime organization? Those who choose to remain connected to the legal crime organization will get what they deserve. Is that understandable as a rational viewpoint of physical reality? Suppose 1 million people joining the new liberty day movement join by July 4th 2011? What signal would that send to everyone else, and compare this question, and answer, to the number of people who have no agreement to join in a new liberty day by July 4th 2011? A. No one joins a movement to cause a new liberty day to be a fact on July 4th 2011. B. 1 million people join a new liberty day movement by July 4th 2011. What signal does A send to the legal criminals, or anyone else, including all the people who have no direction, no plan, no way, and no how, to avoid the bad news on the near horizon? What would happen if a n Alex Jones, or Ron Paul, or Dennis Kucinich, or Bill Smith, or Pete Jones, or Jane Smith, or anyone, a 5 year old child, started a web page, and the web page took off, went viral, gained currency, and the number of people signing the new declaration of independence, to be made effective on July 4th 2011, only if enough numbers joined, and what happens if only 1 million people join by July 4th 2011, and the new date is moved to July 4th 2012? What would happen if by July 4th 2012 the number reaches 100 million honest productive Americans signed onto the new liberty day movement? What happens on that day, what happens because things happen during the next 13 months up to that day, and what happens if those people agree to stop using fraudulent money and start using honest money on that day? Which money is chosen by whom, and will people allow other people to choose more than one money, will there be a working competition for a higher quality money at a lower cost in America? If you cannot see how that will work, then you will continue to be dependent, not independent, and your dependence will be an intimate connection to the worst inhuman examples of evil on earth as the price of your failure to regain the power of independence. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-i-want-to-legalize-freedom-whats-so-bad-about-that.htmlNow, we’re taxing the American people to bomb the very nation that we taxed them to prop up. Honest Productive American People, That is easy to understand on principle, or generally, and specifically, as that is of interest to a very few exclusive number of people. Generally speaking those events are based upon a principle that can be called by many names not limited to: The Business Cycle, Boom and Bust, and Business as Usual. Principally speaking the exclusive few most powerful people cannot allow any competitive power group to exist, and therefore that exclusive few most powerful people will have a vested interest in making damn sure that no competitive power is allowed to gain too much power relative to the power commanded by the few most powerful people, therefore they must govern down the production of power to a manageable level, they must cause a BUST, by some means, not limited to the removal of high quality and low cost currency from the area targeted for a BUST. Principally speaking the exclusive few most powerful people need power, and therefore the victims must be allowed to BOOM, so as to actually produce enough power to empower the few most powerful people. While, principally, or generally, the BOOM is under way, in the targeted area, power flows to the few most powerful people, by many avenues, or circuits, not limited to monetary interest, as debt based loans are transferred to the targeted victims that are currently undergoing a scheduled BOOM. While, principally, or generally, the BUST is under way, in the targeted area, power flows to the few most powerful people, by many avenues, or circuits, not limited to transfers of titles as debt based mortgages default and "collateral" is "repossessed". Principally speaking, or generally speaking, the BOOM and Bust Cycle, or The Business Cycle, transfers power from the honest productive people, the only source of power, to the legal criminals running the legal, criminal, non-competitive, monopoly money extortion racket cabal. Interest is just one interesting, legal, criminal, non-competitive, measure of the flow of power that flows to the legal criminals from the honest productive people. Interest is a specific thing, not a principle thing, or a general thing, in this way of perceiving reality. Again: Now, we’re taxing the American people to bomb the very nation that we taxed them to prop up. That makes a lot of sense when that is viewed from the way a legal criminal will perceive reality as that reality records power transferring from the honest productive people, who produce surplus wealth, and who are the only source of that power, to the legal criminals. The legal criminals laugh all the way to their monopoly banks, with glee, and happy confidence, as their victims remain stupefied, and powerless, and ready victims, perpetually. It can end, overnight. Why wait? Are you waiting for permission to stop being a victim? How long do you think you may have to wait? Please think, with your own brain. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://watchingamerica.com/News/108423/be-watchful-that-the-u-s-might-be-fleecing-the-flock/ Honest Productive Americans, The link offered above is difficult to read, but not as difficult to read as, say, Noam Chomsky's book titled On language - for me. The words chosen are words that are foreign, as if the writer is writing in a foreign language, the science of a specific specialty. Language, as a science, is a specialty by which the perspective intends to do more than just measure something, the intention is to understand something, to understand language, to know it, to be able to conceptualize language as it exists. Language, as far as I can understand so far, is a complex development unique to living organisms whereby one living organism, having achieved self awareness, is then able to know, through language, other self aware perspectives. Language is the medium through which one self aware viewpoint is able to view from another self aware viewpoint, by some measure, through language. Those are my words; not Noam Chomsky's words. I can read the link above, and I can know the perspective of the writer, but only in so far as the foreign perspective relates to my own perspective; the measure of understanding is limited - severely. Case in point:
The viewpoint intends to measure specific things, to see specific things, and to know specific things, to understand specific things, and one of those things is the thing having the name "U.S. government's financial revenue and expenditure". The writer appears to be claiming authority over that measure of that thing, as if the writer knows the accurate measure of the "U.S. government's financial revenue and expenditure". I have a very difficult time acknowledging such authority; without actual measures offered as proof of such authority, since I've been clued in on Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, and other things. Criminals running governments falsify the books, cook the books, and anyone with a brain can figure out why criminals running governments have a vested interest in cooking the books; so where are the books? Where is the information that lends psychological or even material support to the writer who claims to have authority over the measure of the thing in view, this "U.S. government's financial revenue and expenditure" thing? How much of what is within the power of the people running the "U.S. government"? What is the measure of financial revenue flowing from where it is before it flows to where it goes, as it goes to the U.S. government people? If you are anything like me, or if you can borrow my viewpoint on this for a moment, you can see past all the falsehood, and you can go right to the principle, and right to the interest, of the actual thing, and avoid all the smoke and mirrors, and free your own viewpoint from the mire, and the tangled web, and know a much more accurate perspective, one that will empower you, to keep the power you earn, and to avoid having your power stolen. Does that sound like a more workable perspective than the one being offered by the writer in the link at the top of the page? The power flows from those who create it to those who collect it into the "U.S. government's financial revenue and expenditure" thing. That flow is denominated exclusively in dollars, when the measure of it is done legally, or by legal means, or when the measure of it is done by those people who are hired to run the U.S. government, and they are liars, and they are pathological liars, and it is a well established known fact that they are liars, even a child knows that they are liars, leaving few options to explain why anyone would claim authority over anything the hired liars say, or report, or document, measure, claim, confess, or account. The power in question can be accurately measured as surplus wealth, as that which is produced in excess of that which is consumed, and this is a fundamental fact of life viewpoint - irrefutable. To refute the fact is to die, proving the fact. Living organisms must expend power to gain power and failure to gain more power than the power expended is death, slow death, or quick death, it is still death when power is less than the minimum, as life no longer has enough power to consume so as to survive. Easy stuff, easy to see, easy to know, and you do not have to be a licensed, authorized, economics professor, with a badge, or a title, you can know the truth, the facts, and from that point of knowledge, the other pieces of the puzzle fit in place, in rational, logical, order. Honest productive people combine their power to produce more than they consume and the result is a growing measure of surplus wealth, also known as civilization, or progress, or advancement, or increases in the quality of life, or decreases in the cost of life, or increased standards of living, or longer life spans, or lower child mortality rates, or by any measure imaginable, the same principle, and interests, apply, whereby more than the minimum needed for survival must be produced; failing to do so is failure to produce more than the minimum, which is a state of being whereby there is no surplus wealth, none exists, yet. The point is such that time is not static, time is fluid, and every life form is trapped in time, one moment a life form may be consuming more than that which is produced, even to a point at which body fat is being consumed, so as to survive, and at that point in time, the life form had better be consuming that fat in the process of producing more power, failure is death, and it isn't time to go on vacation, if there is no surplus wealth anywhere, if the only measure of surplus wealth is the body fat inside that one living being at that time. While staring death in the face, burning the only surplus wealth left on earth, that measure of body fact, in that one human being, as time goes by, as that one life forms seeks something better than certain, miserable, starving death, as the last of the body fat is used up, that being may do something absurd, such as looking for food, or planting corn, or seeking help from other honest productive people, and doing so in rational order. Or that one being may resort to crime, but that choice does not produce anything, that choice steals that which is already produced. The corn plant produces edible food; which is surplus wealth, in physical form. Harvest, eat, and avoid a miserable death by starvation, for lack of the power of knowing what to do, how to do what to do, and when to do that which can be done, to avoid miserable death by starvation - use the power left to make more power, before all the power is gone, and do so before it is too late. A. Honest productivity (which increases power) B. Crime (which decreases power) Simple stuff. While the legal criminals have their victims focused on the dollar measure of life on earth, the victims can use the power they still have left, to gain more power, before it is too late, simply, easily, and without resort to deceit, and without resort to threats of violence, and without resort to acts of violence: just stop using the fraudulent measure, and invent instead, produce, and maintain an accurate measure, to replace the fraudulent one. If you let the criminals dictate to you, they will tell you that you are broke, that is what they do, while they rob you blind, deaf, dumb, starving, tortured, and mass murdered, and while they are not broke, except by the measure of moral bankruptcy, the same measure that you pay for, as they send you the bill, and you pay for it, since there isn't anyone else who can pay for it, since the only source of surplus wealth is the honest productive moral people who have the power to trust each other, and therefore they have the power to employ division of labor, and therefore they have the power to employ specialization, and therefore they have the power to actually produce more than they consume, because they produce liberty, and they maintain liberty, and in liberty the honest productive people are not spending all their power stabbing each other in the back, while making sure that they are not being stabbed in the back. A. Liberty (more power is produced) B. Crime (produced power is consumed) Liberty is the only state of being that is powerful enough to afford the living beings that which is necessary in order to produce more than that which is consumed, it is the only measure of living by which human beings can prosper, failure to produce liberty, by some measure, is too costly, too much power is expended by each living being fighting each other, for control over a steadily reducing supply of surplus wealth, when liberty is rendered powerless, as lying legal criminals out-law liberty. The stakes are high, but by whose measure is liberty already defeated? By whose measure are the honest productive people now powerless, and incapable of producing never before known amounts of surplus wealth in abundance? Are you really willing to bet the farm on the measure of your power dictated to you by legal criminals? Where do you think that investment of your power will lead? Is it past time to invest your power in a slightly more accurate measure of your power, a measure you don't need to trust so much as you can simply know, in black and white, logically, rationally, reasonably, understandably know, as a well established, continuously improving, record of the facts? Accurate accounting made legal, may be four words that are foreign to you; but ask yourself why - please. Have you been drinking the cool-aid? Stop. Practice something right now, just for a few minutes right now, and then if you see that this practice produces a benefit for you, think about practicing this practice again tomorrow, and see if the practice helps you somehow, someway, by some measure, as the practice may help you gain power, by using the power you have left, to gain more power, by this practice. Think about a time in the future whereby you look at all the people wringing their hands over the perilous situation with "The Dollar" as foreigners, people having nothing whatsoever to do with you, as if they exist on another planet, in another age, or even in an almost forgotten fantasy fable story for children. You have a means by which you connect to all the other honest productive people and that connecting medium is honest, accurate, the highest measure of honestly to date, and that measure of honesty is continuously improved upon, even right now, and the accuracy of the measure is the highest accuracy to date, and that accuracy measure improves more and more each moment, and the cost of that medium of exchange is almost nothing to you, and to everyone else, and the cost of maintaining the medium of exchange is lowering each moment in time. The practice I'm offer to you has two parts, where one part intends to fade out, and the other part intends to fade in. Part 1 Fade out: Honest productive people slow down, then stop, then reverse the focus of their attention on a fraudulent medium of exchange that connects honest productive people to the legal criminals who steal the power produced by the honest productive people, through that fraudulent medium of exchange that the honest productive people are focused upon to a high degree currently. In other words: Stop connecting to the criminals by rejecting their legal money power connection to you. Stop thinking exclusively in terms of dollars; and to do so you must begin that process. Part II Fade in: Honest productive people begin to conceptualize an improved alternative to the connection that currently connects them to the legal criminals, and once that process begins, one person at a time, one moment at a time, and as that process gains currency, as that process gains traction, as that process becomes more popular, and as that process goes viral, and as that process hits critical mass, that new, improved, better, higher quality, and lower cost connection will be invented, produced, and maintained, and it will improve steadily, and the cost of it will decrease steadily over time. In other words: When that which is harmful is known to be harmful, and when that harmful connection is then avoided, there will be room, time, energy, power, in abundance, in the absence of the costly, parasitic, criminal, connection, there will be abundant power sufficient to begin investing that surplus power toward the process of improving the connection between honest productive people, and at that time the measure of surplus wealth will be known, and it will be accurately known, and the growth of it will be knowable, the growth of surplus wealth will be accurate public knowledge, and no longer will honest productive people be inspired to fight each other for a supposed scare supply of power that just so happens to not to be scarce to the legal criminals who steal it, and then the legal criminals use that abundant supply of stolen power to steal more, and more, and more. The steal your power and then the claim that you are broke; which is half true, and probably why you believe them. The other half of the truth exposes the power of the lie. You are broke, but only because your power is stolen, then your power is used to steal more power from you. The legal criminals are not broke. You are broke. The power of the lie can inspire the people who are broke to stop producing more power, so as to cause the criminals to be broke too. How will that work for you? You are already broke, why work, if all you are doing is making the legal criminals rich? If you stop working, the legal criminals go broke too? How absurd can your thinking get, if you do not understand the full measure of the crime? All you have to do is disconnect the connection. Now you are rich. Now the legal criminals are either poor, or they are consuming their fat, or they are consuming each other, because that is what they do, the consume sources of power, they do not produce power. Power is produced by honest productive people. Disconnect, and see what happens, rather than stop working, rather than starve yourself in the effort to kill off the parasites, just remove the connection the parasite has made, and has maintained, between you and it. The capacity of honest productive people to produce never before measured abundant supplies of surplus wealth is real, knowable, understandable, with a little practice. What is in the way? Have the legal criminals stolen your liberty of mind? If so, check mate, and too bad for you, poor, poor, poor, you. If not, what is in your way? Do you lack a game plan? Do you lack an accurate, equitable, honest, connecting medium that connect all the honest productive people together as one powerful force used to increase the standard of living, and at the same time lower the cost of living, and at the same time, the same connecting medium avoids connections to the criminals? Yes, no, maybe? Honest productive people can admit ignorance, it can be a step toward something other than ignorance. Settling for authoritative sounding falsehoods cannot be afforded much longer, and the cost, the bill, will be borne. Those who bear that error will not include those who cause that error, as those who cause that error do so on purpose, willfully, as a rule, they cause it, they know better, you don't, they produce that falsehood for your consumption, not theirs, just look at their standard of living, are they broke, as they tell you that "we" are broke? Will you wait until the legal criminals have consumed all the power they stole from you, and then they need you to produce more, and then they give you permission to make more power, so that they can steal more? Really? "We" are broke? Are you really buying it? Try practicing the fade out, and fade in practice offered above, for a few moments once. Give it a small measure of your power of moral discernment, and if you have any left, and if you can spare a miniscule portion of what you have left, let me know what you think about that practice of fading out with the criminal stuff, and fading in with something better. I'm curious. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones and Lindsey Williams 06-22-2011 Lindsey offers a considerably competitive perspective which diametrically opposes the often repeated Peak Oil measure of reality. On the one hand are those who claim that Oil on Earth is scarce, and limited, and running out, and causing higher costs, and causing lower standards of living, and supporting the legal drive to enforce conservation, and enforce the legal drive to secure, in "The National Interest", scarce, remaining, oil fields, all over the Earth. On the other hand are people like Lindsey Williams, who claim that oil is a power source that is controlled by a few people who use that power to gain control over all forms of power, political power, military power, and economic power. Having control of oil, is similar to having control over legal money, or air, or sunlight, or water, or food, or information, or any power that is necessary, by any measure, and having control of oil, or food, or information, or air, or sunlight, or water, or legal money, means that those who have control over power can cut off the flow of power, which causes a higher demand for power, as power runs out, like a body running out of blood, growing anemic, starving for power, like a human body being strangled, starving for air, like plants cut off from sunlight, starving for sunlight, the living beings will do anything to get the power needed to survive, as scarcity increases, as demand increases, the price people will pay to get needed power increases, and increases, and all the power the victims can produce then flows to those who have gained all power over power. What do you think backs The Dollar Hegemony? A. Oil B. The Military C. Falsehood D. Surplus wealth that is created by honest American people. Which of the above is the most valuable power from the viewpoint of the legal criminals? If you have a problem with the answer I can offer a scenario. What would happen if the next president elected into office decided to declare war on falsehood? What would happen to your mindset if such a thing occurred? How would such a thing play out? Would the honest American people get behind such a war? Would the military get behind such a war? Would all the employees and employers in the oil industry get behind such a war? What would be the first target? Ask the current president? The current president is a documented pathological liar, he would have to do a whole lot of confessing before that president could target anyone else, if the idea was to get the honest productive American people behind such a war. Ask me. I'll ask me. I'll pretend to be the next hired representative of the honest American people as I declare war on falsehood and when asked which target is the first target in the war on falsehood I will say: Look in the mirror. Now you see the first target, and the only target, in the war of falsehood, since no law can stop any criminal from committing falsehood upon the victim, criminals do not obey laws, so why go down that road, why make that false step? Falsehood can only be defeated by the victims. Slavery can only be ended by the slaves. Liberty can only be constructed by the liberators. Falsehood can only be defeated by the believers of it. Criminals know the truth, lies are not effective to the criminals who construct them, unless they make the mistake that they intend to inspire the victims to make, which is the belief in the lies. Look in the mirror. See the first target in the war on falsehood. What do you see? I'll take my own advice. I see, in the mirror, a belief in moral honest productive American people, and the power commanded by them, to use the power they create, to create higher standards of living, at lower costs, if they can divorce themselves from the legal criminals who steal that power and employ that power to steal more power, and more power, and despite that parasitic consumption of power, I believe that the honest productive American people can still create hither standards of living, and continue to lower costs, despite the enormous loss of power wasted by the legal criminals, as the legal criminals spend that power torturing, serial killing, mass murdering, and producing false information in abundance. I may be lying to myself. I may be fabricating lies to make me feel better. I may be parroting lies told to me, lies that adversely affect me, and lies that transfer what little power I have left, to the liars who have targeted me with their lies. Clue me in. What do you see in the mirror? I may be able to help you see the lies you believe, and I'm asking for the same help from you. How can falsehood be measured, known, and defeated otherwise? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones and Paul Craig Roberts 06-22-2011 Direct Democracy? I am no fan of the Constitution; however there is before me, a competition, the lesser of two evils. I prefer a third choice, a non-evil choice. 1. The Constitution (Nationalism, or a Consolidated Government) 2. Direct Democracy How does one person get from 1 to 2? I am one person. I say no to both. I don't pick between those two evils. What do you pick? Do you pick 1, The Constitution, and how do you stop other people from picking 2? Do you pick 2, Direct Democracy, and how do you get what you pick? I think that The Bill of Rights potentially offer a road back in the direction of liberty, so as to move power back to the honest productive people of American who create power, and slow down, and stop, the flow of power to the legal criminals. I think that Trial by Jury potentially offers a road back in the direction of liberty, so as to move power back to the honest productive people of America who create power, and slow down, and stop, the flow of power to the legal criminals. Direct Democracy to me is a lie, it is a false step, and if someone thinks otherwise, they can support their opinion with reason, logic, and some measure of support, such as: http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm That is one of the best explanations of how direct democracy can work in modern times. That is a modern example of mob rule, as it could gain traction, gain currency, become fashionable, become powerful, and overpower the current regime, and overrule current forms of law, as it reached critical mass, and exploded as a force of greater power, eliminating all competitive powers, and once that genie is out of the bottle, heaven forbid, God help us, because we will no longer have the power to help ourselves. That is my opinion of direct democracy, where it leads, and why it is a false step. Combining individual power without moral conscious is a false step, and if direct democracy can be invented, constructed, and maintained by including moral conscious in the combination of individual power, then someone will have to explain how that works to me. What is the first step on that path to direct democracy? I can explain exactly what must be done to return to liberty, step, by step, on that road, and the first step is to cut the flow of power flowing from the honest productive people as that power flows to the legal criminals who then employ that power to increase the rate of that flow of power. Two legal financial products can accomplish that goal, and I can explain each step on the way to reaching that goal, in time, and in place. Can the proponents of direct democracy offer a similar step by step method of arriving at that goal? You tell me. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Obama Forfeits Peace Prize Obama has Nobel Peace Prize Rescinded Honest Productive Americans, As President, presuming the case, and why not, look at the measure of deceit offered by the competition: peace will be made legal once again, by way of legal competition. The two products that pave the way will effectively change the old regime, A.K.A. The Dollar Hegemony, from which the hired professional liars, torturers, serial killers, and mass murderers are employed, and a new regime, of higher quality, and lower cost, will be allowed to compete. The ball is always in your court, since you make that ball, and you allow it to be stolen from you, and all you have to do is stop allowing it to be stolen, and Henry Ford's worry comes true. This: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henryford136294.html It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. You don't have to take my word for it, since, perhaps, you are conditioned to trust that all politician lie, once you regain your power, trust your own good, moral, judgement. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.dawn.com/2011/07/01/us-rejects-demand-to-vacate-shamsi-base.html Anyone, The above link is a measure of the line being drawn in the sand - for public consumption. How does anyone gain access to the accurate and up-to-date decisions made by the most powerful people, the people who have the power to Boom and Bust hundreds of millions, even billions, of human lives? Follow the currency, including the currencies by which legal crime is measured, including torture victims, and mass murder victims. Plot on a world map the current torture dungeons, how many victims enter, and how many leave, dead or alive, and if you have access to that accurate information, you are one of a very few, and much closer to the top of the power pyramid, much closer to the peak, where the power to Boom and Bust hundreds of millions, even billions of human lives live, and decide, and order, and cause, and perpetrate their crimes. They Boom to gain power, to cause their victims to acquiesce, and then they bust to gain power, because the victims cannot, ever, be allowed to gain the power to resist. Plot on a world map the current flow of military weapons as those products are consumed in the work that they are designed by their producers to accomplish, and count the bodies of the formerly living, and the formerly happy, innocent, people, and even count the number of fellow criminals who are now dead, or wounded, as a result of those devices as they flow to their designated targets; and now the measure of power wielded by the few most powerful people is plotted, accurately, on the world map. What the most powerful people see, is what the most powerful people use, in making those most powerful decisions, as they decide who to Boom, and who will be Busted. There is a line in the sand. How can that line be drawn, in such a way, as to afford all the past victims, all the present victims, and all the future victims, to see the same line in the sand as the line drawn by the most powerful, the ones who wield the power to Boom, and to Bust, the lives of hundreds of millions of people - even billions? A quote from the link: The US is rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. The places where the innocent victims are tortured, and the places where the innocent victims are mass murdered are real, they exist, and they can be plotted out on maps, and the more accurate the data, the more complete the data, the more will be the power that no longer flows to the legal criminals from the victims from which the power is stolen, from which the power is produced. Legal criminals do not produce power, they steal it, and then they use that stolen power in the work of destruction - that is what they do. Note how the quote above is false, and willfully false, as the measure of the data willfully intends to cover up the truth, and in so doing the victims remain incapable of stemming the loss of their power as it flows to the legal criminals, and as those legal criminals then employ that stolen power Booming and Busting at their sole discretion. They will Boom the networks of people who produce those military weapons, and they will Boom the networks of people who facility the transfer of legal power, legal money, to finance their power to Boom, and they will Boom the networks of people who produce the political (psychological) power required to keep the power flowing from the honest productive people to the legal criminals, the buy votes, and then they Bust anyone, and everyone, who becomes powerful enough to compete with their exclusive, monopoly, legal, crime power. The temporarily Boomed networks of people aid, abet, and offer economic support, political support, psychological support, intellectual support, and immoral support to the legal criminals so long as they do, they can be temporarily Boomed, up to a point, over time, while those who are out-of-control, the disobedient, are Busted, for the crime of not being ready, willing, and able victims. The quote again: The US is rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. Take the first five symbols in that quote and understand the measure of the lie it represents. "The US" What are the victims reading into that lie? Do the victims see the most powerful people who make the decisions and order the torture and mass murder of millions of innocent victims, or is the intent of the lie such that the victims see the honest productive, and innocent, people of America instead of the exact opposite? A. Legal Criminals B. Honest productive Americans Are you too tired to unravel the lie, and in so doing, gain the power that is required to lessen your victimization? Will you simply fail to regain the power of liberty? Rewrite the sentence from the two obvious perspectives offered to you, as a means of gaining the power required to regain liberty. A. Legal criminals are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. B. Honest productive Americans are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. Now you have two competitive messages that can help the reader understand the full measure of the propaganda that is used in the effort to keep the power flowing from the victims to the legal criminals. Which is the accurate measure of reality? You are confused, and I've just started unraveling one sentence for you. A. Legal criminals are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. B. Honest productive Americans are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. C. The US is rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. It is a tangled web of deception, and it must be seen from a principled starting point, a grounding, or foundation, or balanced point of fundamental moral understanding; but there it is for you, to see clearly. The first re-write of the first 5 symbols in that one sentence of measurable propaganda is accurate, the actual truth: A. Legal criminals are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. The second re-write of the first 5 symbols is the intended message that is supposed to be received by the targeted victims of the false propaganda: B. Honest productive Americans are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. Then there is the false propaganda quoted verbatim: C. The US is rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to stage drone strikes against militants, US officials told Reuters. Do you see? You are targeted to be modified in your behavior, so as to cause you to think that it is the honest productive American people who have decided to abuse your own power, to commit crimes with the power that you alone produce, and suffering from that lie, you are powerless to stop the abuse of your power. You fail to hold to account the actual people who are responsible for the abuse of your power. It is a shell game, it is a version of bait and switch. Moving on to the most important false advertizement in the false propaganda, and ignoring other lesser ambiguities, mixed messages, and wrong headed verbiage, the reader can focus willful intent upon knowing the full and accurate measure of the choice, by the propagandists, to use the word "militants". If the term "terrorist" is used, instead, then the targeted victims of the lie may envision, or call up, images of 911, and that won't work in Pakistan, or Libya for that matter. A new target has been chosen to be Busted, since the old targets have already been Busted to the limit of the power held by those who are ordering, and executing, those destructive goals. 911, and "terrorists" worked, as long as it worked, and it is no longer going to work, to get the new goal reached. "Militants" is chosen, as the "target" word, for a reason. What is the actual truth, what is the accurate re-write of the sentence, if the word "militant" is taken out, and in place of that false word someone chooses a more accurate measure of the targeted people? Here is where the lie becomes very difficult to accurately report. Who is on the list of "militants" that are identified accurately according to who picks them, and who is on the list of "militants" who are then communicated to the people who actually place the target on (or near) the person, or persons, as they live their lives on earth? Who is on the list before the bodies pile up? Who is on the list of people killed, or wounded, after the weapons have done the job they were made to do, after the ordered work has been worked out in fact? A. The list of intended targets (where is this list?) B. The list of killed and wounded which is the result of the premeditated, and willful act, of targeting the intended targets, while knowing the proximity of innocent people nearby. I don't know, so I have to guess, and I can offer my subjective interpretation of the false propaganda, as to what the message would report to the reader if the message was written so as to inform the readers of the accurate facts, instead of having a message produced and published by which the intent is to misinform, misdirect, and render the reader powerless. A. Legal criminals are rejecting demands from Pakistan that American personnel abandon a military base used by the CIA to torture and mass murder disobedient people, Legal Criminals ordered their propaganda publishers. That was the true measure of the message, assuming that the reporters wanted to report the truth, and do so honestly, as far as my viewpoint can offer. The message that the legal criminals intend to transfer to the targeted victims of false propaganda follows (from my viewpoint, absent more accurate lists of the actual people being targeted, and absent the actual list of people who are killed, and who are wounded by those willful legal crimes): B. Honest productive Americans are rejecting demands from militant Pakistan that American personnel (good guys) abandon a military base used by the (censored) to stage drone strikes against the bad guy militants; the good guys told Reuters. P.S. Reuters is the best competitive accurate news service helping keep the honest productive American people well informed. To what end would anyone dream up as their goal when they choose to read "news" reports that begin with so much false propaganda right at the start of the "report"? What is the true measure of the line in the sand? What is the true measure of the thin blue line? What is the accurate discriminatory division between the moral, honest, productive, good people, and the immoral, dishonest, destructive, bad people? Why not look here: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is an important measure of the line in the sand. Those who are deceitful, or those who are Boomed by those who are deceitful (power is transferred to people, by way of subsidy, or low, or no, interest "charge", and transferred from the stolen power supply), are separated from those who are honest productive Americans. Who owes who, and why does who owe who, according to that specific measure of that specific line in the sand, and it is a line in the sand the is accurate, and meaningful, in a general sense; and it is, the entire measure of it, that Debt Clock measure of it, is a current thing, a flowing of power, and it is a question being answered, so, again, what is it? In a very specific sense, an actual paper (or digital) trail, the same line in the sand is measured by following Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, explained well enough here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5823209513192072459#docid=6703413885850200097 The entire measure of that line in the sand, which accurately divides the measure of those who gain at the expense of the productive American people, and those who constitute the entire measure of the productive American people, is denominated in dollars. If the goal is to sever that connection, so as to stop the flow of power flowing from the productive American people, as that power flows to those who gain at the expense of the productive American people, then all that is needed, simply, and irreversibly, is to use a competitive form of legal money, and by competitive, by that word choice, the intent is to inform the reader that competition is the force that causes the quality of legal money to increase, and competition is the force that forces the cost of money to decrease, and therefore it is that force that the reader may become aware of, once again, and it is that force that forces the productive American people to work toward higher quality production, at a lower cost, and do so honestly, and do so without resort to deceit, which is also a force, and without resort to threats of violence, which is also a force, and without resort to aggressive (criminal) violence, which is also a force. The line is the sand is being drawn by the legal criminals, who do deceive, as a rule, and who do threaten violence, as a rule, and who do plan on, and then execute those plans, to injure innocent victims, by torture, by wounding, and by murdering them, massively, as a rule. Which line do you think the legal criminals will be drawing, for public consumption? It will be a destructive one, and it will not be a productive one. It will be constructed by lies. It will be constructed by threats of violence. It will constructive by acts of very miserable violence. Terrible violence. It will render the honest productive people powerless in the face of the force of deceit, the force of violent threats, and the force of criminal, aggressive, violence, for profit of a few, at the expense of all the ready victims. It is not news. It, the lines drawn by legal criminals, has been done in the past, and they have left paper trails then too. Here are two examples that suffice to illustrate the point - if you care to look - and if you care less, then that lack of that power also measures the true line in the sand (as well as does the debt clock, and CAFR). A. http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ That is a well researched report on how power flowed from honest productive Americans, to the legal criminals, who then used that power to draw lines in the sand, so as to cause a whole lot of destruction, on purpose, for profit. But that is half of that story - roughly. Here is the other half: B. http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ The same general power flow chart is reported, in dollars, as power flows from the honest productive American people, to the legal criminals, and then that stolen power is used to finance all sides of a planned BUST of hundreds of millions of people, so as to keep the power supply low enough for the legal criminals to manage, and so as to destroy all competition where ever, and when ever competition arises. They, apparently, are done with The Dollar, and they are flying capital to Asia, and they are Booming all sides of a new "catalyzing event", so as to usher in a new world order, whereby the new legal monopoly money power will no longer be The Dollar Hegemony, which has been the one monopoly power for about 100 years now, and the new legal monopoly power will be what it is after all the chips fall as they fall after the new event. Those last two links can be summed up as one event. WWII World War Two That is a term. That is a number of symbols. WWII What is the true measure of World War Two? What is the measure of World World Two; for public consumption? What could possibly be the goal for anyone, any human being alive today, on the road to World War Three? You can call me any name you want, any name your exposure to behavioral modification demands from you, any knee jerk reaction caused, in you, by your exposure to false propaganda, any word erupting into your consciousness, while you read my words, that exists in your being because your behavior has been modified by your long, and relentless, exposure to lies, but the facts remain despite that diversion from the facts: the legal criminals must invent, produce, and maintain a legal money monopoly, without which their source of power is no more. The concept is as easy to understand as a clerk at a store who is given a credit card from any known dead beat, and the clerk simply, and almost effortlessly cuts the credit card in half. The dead beat, or the entire cabal of legal criminals, in unison, no longer have their stolen power flowing to them, and they either wither on the vine, die of starvation, or they get honest work like everyone else, or, absent those options, they depend upon charity, which can only come from people who have something to give. They may even turn on each other, stealing the last of each others power, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of violence, absent honest productive people as ready victims. If the legal criminals no longer have power flowing to them from their victims, they can't buy votes, without draining the power they have left. Legal criminals can't afford to be "generous" with the power that they steal from the honest productive Americans, once that power stops flowing to them. Too bad for them: live by deceit, and die by it, live by threats of violence, die by that chosen method, and live by aggressive wars for profit, and die by that same measure of profit. What does all that have to do with honest, productive, innocent, American people? It, my friends of liberty, is your connection to the legal criminals by way of a legal money monopoly. Knowing that fact, is not "for public consumption", not on a need-to-know basis, a trade secret, and exclusive franchise, an elite legal license. The legal criminals have to find another source of power, once the power to steal from their victims is gone. They know that, and you can't, that information is outlawed. Why do you think power is now flowing to Asia? Think, before it is too late. Do you know, for sure, that all those Aircraft Carriers are secure? Who told you such lies? Have you avoiding the onerous, and horrific, work required to actually contemplate the cost of war with China, and Russia, and Iran, and Venezuela, and perhaps even Brazil, and who knows who else, Saudi Arabia, combined against the legal criminals running the American Military, when, in fact, the leaders of that entire combined American Military Force is commanded, in part, by the opposition? The top of the pyramid of legal monopoly money power have the inside information, they know the true measure of the actual line in the sand, so they know where to move their power when that power must be moved, not too soon, and not too late. When it is time to dump the dollar, they will know, and those who don't know, will be left holding that empty bag. You think I am stupid? Really? You think I am misinformed? By what accurate measure? When the legal criminal's plan includes the plan to maintain control of the legal money monopoly, the world wide legal money monopoly power, do you think that they have any sense of duty attached to the name on the door, or the symbol on the stationary, or the trade-mark, or the flag, or the Nation, or the State, or the Government, or the Company, or anything at all, other than the one single target in their view. Call me whatever you want, while you read these words that intend to quantify a thing in your view, a thing that once you know it, you cannot forget it, not without serious effort. The thing in view is a world wide legal money monopoly power. You don't even have it in your sights, other people command it, and to the limit of your power, they will keep it. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28454.htm Honest Productive Americans, Above is a link to an article that can be measured as a voice from the left, and I have a problem with such things. Is the term "left" a usable term? The writer explains the meaning of his voice in greater detail than a sound bite: Progressives people, designated as “the Left,” believe that the poor are victims of the rich and the prerogatives of wealthy and powerful interests should be done away with. They believe labor unions should be strengthened and the rights of working people expanded; the environment should be rigorously protected; racism, sexism, and homophobia should be strenuously fought; and human services should be properly funded. My problem with the term "left" is similar to my problem with the more detailed explanation quoted above, and my problem concerns the accuracy of the message. If someone, anyone, wants to do away with the prerogatives of wealthy and powerful interests, then what does that mean, exactly? If that means: Invent, and maintain, a competitive legal currency, and in so doing, do away with the prerogatives of the wealthy and powerful interests who have gained their power by inventing and maintaining a legal crime money monopoly which causes all forms of wealth and power to flow to those few people through that legal monopoly currency extortion racket, which is now known as The Federal Reserve System, then, if that is the goal, how can that accurate message be any different than the same message coming from the supposed "right"? Where do the interests of the poor and wealthy people meet? How does anyone measure wealth? Not having any is a measure. Having so much that the commander of extreme wealth can get away with massive torture, serial killing, and mass murder perpetually is a measure. What is the unit of measure? What is wealth? Too many questions? From the link: In the political realm, the further left one goes on the opinion spectrum the more difficult it is to gain exposure and access to larger audiences. Strenuously excluded from the increasingly concentrated corporate-owned media are people on the Left who go beyond the conservative-liberal orthodoxy and speak openly about the negative aspects of big capital and what it does to people at home and abroad. That is not a phenomenon that is exclusive to the so called "left". Try gaining access to popular news media channels with the message that the legal criminals running U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) perpetrated the destruction of three buildings in New York City on September 11th 2001, so as to launch a new regime change campaign in The Middle East, and other reasons of similar power transferring profit motives. That is one of my last messages offered to the Austrian Economics Forum, before that popular news medial channel censored my messages. When a message threatens the power of someone, in simple terms, there is a knee jerk reaction called up within the individuals who are threatened, and that reaction is one of censorship. How about a joke to illustrate the point? The sheep herder, who is of good standing within the local community, but who has had his way with the sheep, often enough, is met by a reporter claiming that sheep can talk. What does the sheep herder say when asked about the talking sheep? "Those sheep lie!" How is there any difference between a workers union and any other legal collection of power? Many people send their individual power to a central location where all the individual measures of power are collected, for a reason, and once enough power is collected, the power is used to accomplish a goal. How are labor unions not wealthy? How are labor unions not interested in gaining something? How complicated can the power struggle get when the victims fail to accurately understand the true nature of it; while the legal criminals remain in command of that powerful knowledge, and while the legal criminals use that power to make damn sure that no one else knows those exclusive realizations? The power over law is not worth a dime without the power over surplus wealth, and although the power over law was, and is, used to gain control over the power over surplus wealth, law is not necessary, for the victims to regain control over their power over the surplus wealth they alone create. The power over surplus wealth is a power that connects each individual person who creates surplus wealth with each other individual person who creates surplus wealth, and that connection can be exclusive to honest productive people, or that connection can allow, welcome, and offer access to legal criminals, and once that connection between the honest productive people and the legal criminals is made what do you think happens? This is not news. Read history: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Once power begins flowing from the honest productive people who create it, to the legal criminals, the honest productive people grow weaker and the legal criminals grow stronger, and that stolen power is used to keep that power flowing in that direction, accelerating the rate of flow, and even accelerating the rate of acceleration of that flow, until the rate of that flow is measurable as such: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Sever the connection and what happens? Think. Don't just jerk your knee. The connection connects all the honest productive people to each other AND connects all the honest productive people to the legal criminals. If the connection is gone, or if it rendered useless ("Economic Collapse"), there is no longer any capacity, no longer an power, to create surplus wealth, not within that group of honest productive people who were formerly connected to each other. If only the legal criminals are disconnected from the honest productive people, what happens? What is so difficult about inventing, and maintaining, an honest money? The victims are not allowed to even know what can happen when the victims regain their power, over their own thoughts first, and then over their power to create and employ surplus wealth. When the host is dying of anemia, because too many parasites are killing the host, is it time to seek membership in the parasite gang? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The following is the type of exchange that occurs, rarely, between an individual and myself, when perspectives compete: Discussion The currency debate is one in which I am not versed well enough to yet form a rigid decision. One thing for sure, the dollar doesn't go nearly as far as it used to. My best stance on the issue would be in relating it to my daily life. HCKaos, The employment of a legal monopoly currency extortion racket is insidious and well covered up with falsehoods that flow as readily from the same source as the units of legal money does, from well before the usurpation occurs and constantly from then on; which is the nature of falsehood - one lie causes a demand for two lies, and then two lies cause a demand for four. While the victims focus on the lies produced, including the actual money units, the real force of the deception causes both psychological (political) and physical (economic) power to flow from the honest productive people to whomever the legal criminals target, exploit, and then charge, or tax, or demand eventual transfer of power to those in control of the legal money supply. People are led to believe that money is power itself, and focus is then trained on money, not the fact that it is currency, and not the fact that the power of money is the power to purchase, and not the fact that ultimately the goal of the legal criminals is a power to purchase destruction. What do you think is done by anyone seeking more power, once their power to produce has reached a limit? The same question can include a vital word, or two, or three, that adds to the measure of the question in such a way as to clue the person asking the question in on the accurate answer. What do you think is done by anyone seeking more power, once their power to honestly produce has reached a limit? What do you think is done by anyone seeking more power, once their power to produce, without resort to deception, and without resort to threats of violence, and without resort to acts of violence, has reached a limit? The answer is not as easy as it may first appear. People reaching that limit of power that can be gained honestly, and without threats of violence, and without resort to gaining more power by destroying with aggressive violence, are in competition with other people seeking power within those same limitations; therefore what must be done by those seeking power without those limitations, is to make what they do against the law for everyone except them. What must be done, rationally, reasonably, logically, and effectively, is to award a select group, license, or for a select group to seize exclusive license, to use deceit, to use threats of violence, and to use acts of terrible, and massive, violence, while no one else is legally allowed to do so, and once that power is transferred to that select group, what do you think will be produced by said group? 1. Deceit 2. Threats of violence 3. Massive amounts of aggressive violence, for the profits of a select few, paid for by the many, directly as targets, or indirectly as the producers of the surplus wealth required in the work of destruction. While the targeted victims are focused on gaining their own power, with the money that is "loaned" to them, at interest, and while those same honest productive people are shackled within the limits of power that can be accumulated honestly, and without ever resorting to threats of violence, and without ever resorting to actual violence, there is no limit on the amount of power that is flowing to the legal criminals who are excepted from those limits lawfully. That is my long winded way of saying this: Common Sense Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. I have a shorter version too. Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while single legal monetary units appreciate, because power reduces the cost of production. Destruction reduces production, raises the cost of production, consumes power, and causes the legal monopoly monetary unit to depreceate. So why choose to deceive - which destroys, as a rule, as a purpose? So why choose to threaten violence - which destroys, as a rule, as an intended purpose? So why choose to injure innocent victims with violence - which destroys, as a rule, as a willful, premeditated, intended act, for exclusive profit? While the victims are focused on one single legal monopoly unit, because it is a requirement of social life, by law, what do you think is going on behind the scenes in a big, big, big, way? How big? Here are past measures: News report A News report B Those deceptions, those threats of violence, and those acts of violence were orchestrated in that way, for a specific purpose, and a purpose that is not for public consumption. A new arrangement is in the execution stage today, and that new arrangement appears to be the move of The World Reserve Currency, currently The Dollar Hegemony (The Federal Reserve System of legal fraud), to another base of operations, with another name, most likely to Asia, and the events that cause that move may include events that will be recorded in the history books posthumously, and that will be a book that is published for public consumption, and the tile on that history book will be: World War III. Currently the vast supplies of surplus wealth that have been produced, and have been stolen, are flowing to places that are setting in place the powers that need to be powerful so as to cause these new planned events. The stories that are for public consumption include stories that claim that these pending events are random and inevitable, and the legal criminals are doing everything possible to avoid them, and they are merely unable to stop the inevitable forces that are randomly occurring. And that may all be too much for someone who is focused on making a living within the boundaries of moral being. Seeking work in exchange for dollars sufficient for survival. If I use credit to finance a lifestyle I can no longer pay for, at what point does it make sense to stop purchasing? Once in the business cycle the power of credit includes investment decisions that are long term, seeking a steady flow of return on investment, and therefore the simple calculation is obviously more complicated. Harboring an incomplete or confused perception of the concept of credit, often confusing that concept with the concept of debt, is bound to render the confused, or the bewildered, stupefied, and powerless, and if that sounds insulting, it is only meant to be accurate, and if the shoe fits, it is beyond my power to unfit it, it merely fits. Often such reports by me insight in the reader a knee jerk reaction to shoot the messenger. That is also not within my power to control, absent self-censorship, which is within my power, and I choose not to censor the honest truth as I see it. That answer is obvious to me, but at the government level that simple fact is not considered. Have you investigated Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports yet? Why would anyone ever assume that "they" are such and such, while "we", are by some measure smarter, or more powerful, as they drive their limousines to one of their summer homes claiming that "we" are broke? Actual people make willful decisions for specific reasons and the consequences of those willful acts are accurately recorded on ledgers; leaving a trail that identifies who is profiting at whose expense. It is not a mystery. The solution is to raise their own credit limit? Do you have a working concept of credit? Do you have a working concept of debt? Are your working concepts of credit and debt the same concept, indistinguishable from one to the other, but for some reason the two exact same concepts have two names, for some strange reason? Who is "their" in your question? Who are those people, exactly? What do you mean when you use the word "own" in that sentence? Credit is a social connection between individuals who agree to credit an individual with the power to purchase. Many people voluntarily agree to allow an individual to purchase, because that individual has been afforded the power according to everyone else who affords that individual that power to purchase. In that sense, it can be understood, that everyone else is in debt to that one individual who has been afforded, by some means, the power to purchase, or, in other words, everyone is in debt to the one who has been given credit, and given that credit, in that measure, by everyone else who has voluntarily done so - not having anything to do with anyone else who is not connected in that specific way. Is that something worth seeing, or is it better to confuse credit with debt, as if credit and debt were the same thing? Here is your question again: The solution is to raise their own credit limit? Here is some news for anyone, you, anyone: The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) consists of twelve members--the seven members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; and four of the remaining eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who serve one-year terms on a rotating basis. Here: Federal Reserve Those are people. They live, they breath, and they eat. They have the power to double or cut in half the entire number of legal dollar units. You don't. If you fail to understand the full measure of that power, you are ignorant. If you are ignorant, that isn't so bad, compared to someone who believes that they know the full measure of the power held by those few people, while being ignorant. In the case of mere ignorance, the individual is in a position to know better. In the case of a belief in falsehood, the individual is powerless to know better. Which is it? We're proving we cannot make the interest payments, yet will spend millions debating that fact and work to secure more credit cards? WTF?!? Those words above prove to me the level of your brainwashing as being severe. I can't help you out of that mire. You have to pull yourself out, and all I can do is offer competitive choices to you. Which choice will you take? All the information I have been gathering for over 25 years indicates that the most powerful few are Busting U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) and those powerful few are moving central command to Asia, under a different name, and to get to that goal those powerful few are willing, able, and ready, to cause World War III. These facts measure up as a very good opportunity for all the honest productive American people, to regain control over the law power, and the money power, since those powers are being destroyed by those few most powerful legal criminals. In the absence of a moral law power, and in the absence of a credit worthy lawful money power, because those powers are being destroyed, there will be something filling that void, what will fill that void, what will be supplied to meet that demand? If the legal criminals have their way, according to their plans, that void will be filled with whatever works best for them, at the expense of all the honest productive American people - which is not too difficult to understand. That measures up as this: Power Flow Chart The plan being carried out by the legal criminals will measure up as that same thing above, or better, for them, which is worse for the honest productive American people. While The Dollar Hegemony is willfully destroyed, so as to usher in something better for the legal criminals, the honest productive American people have an opportunity to fill the void during that Bust part of that cycle. While the same legal criminals are willfully destroying the moral law power, which is a continuous Bust cycle, the honest productive American people have two choices: A. Regain moral law power B. If you can't beat em': join em' Either the moral law power will be commanded into greater power or the criminal power will gain more power during that low point on our horizon. Which is it going to be? It won't be stumbled upon by the ignorant. It certainly won't be willfully gained by the misdirected, the misled, and those who willfully choose a false path. Honest productive people will either win or they will suffer even more at the hands of those who target them, exploit them, and steal their power, and then use that stolen power to keep that power flowing, and then accelerate the flow of that stolen power, and then accelerate the rate of acceleration of that flow of power. Here in the last true bastion of freedom (for now) the web, how best can WE pool OUR resources to organize, in such a way as people will give a shit, and mobilize to have our voices heard? You are one of a very few people I've come across in more than 25 years, as someone willing to stick your neck out, and have the false parts chopped off, or as a direct result of your risk, you manage to help someone else, by exposing their delusions, which, in essence, is the power of discussion. Not debate. Not argumentation for the sake of argumentation. Competitive viewpoints honestly shared in the effort to improve the accuracy of the shared viewpoint, and therefore lower the costs of life directed on false headings. What is the purpose of discussion, and why is discussion absent in modern times? You are the exception. What else is in your power to do, as you seek to solve the problems that you have accurately identified? I have been on this path for over 25 years, and I have answers, and you can read the answers I offer, including the Product 1 and Product 2 answers, to test them for validity, or you can ignore those answers and invent your own. Whichever works for you. Here in the last true bastion of freedom (for now) the web, how best can WE pool OUR resources to organize, in such a way as people will give a shit, and mobilize to have our voices heard? Product 1: A legal credit afforded to honest productive people who have earned a no interest mortgage loan for their principle residence and their business property. Product 2: A legal credit afforded to honest productive people who have earned a 1% interest loan on any purchase whereby it is proven that the power consumed is less than the power gained by that purchase in excess of a 1% gain in power. If the goal is ambiguous, how can there be a specific path to that goal? If you don't like the goal I offer, or the specific path to that goal, but you have no competitive goal, and you have no competitive path to no goal, how can my goal offered, and the path to my offered goal, be considered inferior by you? What ever happened to Common Sense in America? I have an obvious answer. Common Sense is an exclusive license held by the very few legal criminals, the ones who have awarded themselves all the credit in the world, and Common Sense has been outlawed, and is enforced as being against the law, for any of the many debtors who have been made debtors by law, by those powerful few. If that has gone beyond the word limit, so be it. My power is severely limited. I am not a member of the FOMC. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jQ2t22_Eoei8X9FC_4Eg_M5fCdtQ?docId=CNG.e740b6d0077ba8c28f6d1dd931c6f679.b11US wars leave 225,000 dead, cost $4.4 trillion: study Anyone, For those of us in the fact based living arrangement, as opposed to the alternative, which is based upon falsehood, the costs of unquestioned obedience to falsehood is accurately accounted in both general and specific measures. The above news item is a general measure. The specific measures occur at specific times, in specific places, where costs are borne at that time, in that place, by whomever bears that specific cost, to the degree that that individual truly knows the cost, as the facts are no longer, in any way, hidden from view, no longer cloaked behind any possible misrepresentation, and as real as reality can be, while that person pays that cost. The tortured are tortured. The terrified are terrified. The murdered are dead. No lie can ease the torture. No lie can calm the terrified, as much as there is no rest for the weary, what is: is. Those who believe in resurrection of the dead, or the afterlife, or reincarnation can believe what may happen after the dead are dead, but while they are dead, while life was stolen from them, they remain dead, murdered, and not resurrected, and after life is what it is, while the bodies rot, fill mass graves, and the murderers continue to raise the price to be paid for by the increasing supply of ready victims, as the production of more lies continue flowing from the producers of those lies to the targeted, gullible, and stupefied victims, those not yet tortured enough, those not yet terrified enough, and those not yet murdered. The numbers in the link are general, subject to subjective interpretation, error, miscounting, and most certainly lacking an accurate accounting of those who are most responsible, as well as lacking an accurate accounting of those who are merely supplying material and psychological support to that effort to cause those lies to perpetuate, the effort to continue those tortures, the effort to perpetuate terror, and the effort to massively murder the millions of innocent victims who are screaming of pain on their way to early mass graves. Those numbers generally account for the real time tragedy, not a Hollywood movie, not a reality television show, not a future science fiction fantasy, not a story book drama, but actual human beings having their lives made incomprehensible miserable, and prematurely ended, for what? It is for the profit of a very few people, and it is for costs to be borne by everyone else, costs to be paid for by everyone except those few who now command the power to make their victims believe, and even beg for, falsehood. On the large list of lies are competitive examples that vie for the top position as the most costly lies, the lies that are the most costly to the victims, and inversely proportionally the most profitable for the legal criminals. I can offer a competitive list of those most costly, and those most profitable lies. Here is my top of the list, number one, lie: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That lie runs so deep within the consciousness of all the victims that it is nearly impossible to help those infected victims, who are suffering from an unchallenged belief in that lie; I have tried, and so far, who, anywhere, anyone: who can claim to have managed victory over it? The dollar is a fraud, yet all the victims use it, with unchallenged belief in its legitimacy as the true account of money world wide. How can such a powerful lie gain so much currency? That brings me to the second biggest lie on my competitive list, offered to the readers, who can, if they choose, challenge my list with a more valuable, or more accurate, or higher quality, and lower cost list. http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html For those who harbor a belief in that lie, that big lie, a belief that the above lie is in any way, a measure of Liberty, I have news for you, that lie is a lie, it is not a measure of Liberty, it is the exact opposite, I offer two obvious examples of the facts for you, just in case your infection has not yet rendered you powerless: Constitution Fact #1: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html Article. I. Those are enabling worlds. What do they enable? Note the diametric opposite of that which those enabling words above enable, note the opposite of those enabling words above, as the opposite is reported within the following document: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/bdsdcc:@field%28DOCID+@lit%28bdsdcc02101%29%29 That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Sorry to say, for the dupes, for the gullible, for the stupefied, you have been had, once there was a time when the honest productive American people commanded power over their own government, empowering their right to abolish criminal governments, but, alas, the legal criminals reclaimed that power, with lies, such as the lie that claims that such power requires a license, and is a power given to the honest productive people by the false authorities. A. People have the right, the power, to abolish criminal governments, a known fact. B. The criminal government enforcers claim the right to suppress the people who exercise their right to abolish criminal governments. One is one thing, and the other is the opposite thing, and not knowing the difference is called ignorance. Victims, if they are anything, are ignorant, lacking the knowledge required to avoid victimization. If people choose to be victims, they are not victims, which is another lie, perhaps, something worth placing on a list of the most destructive lies. For those who are unaware of the one obvious test case, whereby the legal criminals tested their power to suppress rebellion, after those same people had once conducted rebellion themselves, turning their coat from rebels against criminal governments, and then donning the cloak of legitimacy, hiding their true color, disguising their crimes; look here: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html George Washington is famous for, if anything, leading the Rebel Army as those insurgents threw out the criminal government oppressors then known as The British, or Red Coats. That rebellion was conducted under an impromptu, and experimental, government, consisting of a Continental Congress, and the formation of The Articles of Confederation; which amounted to a Swiss Model Republic, or, a Democratic Federated Republican form of Government, and with an all volunteer army, the new experimental government power, managed to work for the people so that the people could win the war for independence, and win their Liberty. Why do you think the British sent conscripted or mercenary troops to America? They were suppressing rebellion. The British were doing this: Article. I. What were the American people doing, when they volunteered to remove the aggressively invading foreign troops, as those Red Coats ran amok at home, pillaging, raping, and destroying public, and private property? They were doing this: That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. What was George Washington doing when he conscripted an army of National soldiers, from the Consolidated government, when he invaded the sovereign State of Pennsylvania, as the people in Pennsylvania were busy rebelling against the criminal government, as the people in Pennsylvania were abolishing the criminal enforcement of a banking monopoly fraud, or tax, on Whiskey? Do you understand the full measure of the lie? Here are George Washington's words as a Rebel and I will offer a link to the book that I have on that subject, the book that reports the quoted words from George Washington during the Rebel years: http://www.amazon.com/1776-David-McCullough/dp/B000YTJHKG "Those who have committed no fault want no pardon," Washington said plainly. "We are only defending what we deem our indisputable rights." That is George Washington, the Rebel Army Commander, speaking to the criminal invading army offering of pardons, for having failed to be obedient. Note the reference to "indisputable rights"? Such as: That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Now note how George Washington, once turning his coat, once George Washington became, himself, a turncoat, his words record the opposite position, as he proclaimed authority to suppress rebellion, to become the oppressor, and to fail to acknowledge god given rights: Therefore, and in pursuance of the proviso above recited, I. George Washington, President of the United States, do hereby command all persons, being insurgents, as aforesaid, and all others whom it may concern, on or before the 1st day of September next to disperse and retire peaceably to their respective abodes. And I do moreover warn all persons whomsoever against aiding, abetting, or comforting the perpetrators of the aforesaid treasonable acts; and do require all officers and other citizens, according to their respective duties and the laws of the land, to exert their utmost endeavors to prevent and suppress such dangerous proceedings. Furthermore, the evidence available previous to that moment when George Washington, himself, suppressed that specific rebellion, a battle occurred between rebels and oppressors in Massachusetts, when, at that earlier time, no such National Consolidated Government existed, which was before the time when the legal criminals claimed the right to suppress rebellions Nation WIDE, since, at that earlier time, during that earlier rebellion, there was no Nation State, there was no Consolidated Government, there was then the same experimental Democratic Federated Republic that worked for The People in their efforts to throw out criminal governments, and that battle was to become known as Shays's Rebellion. In chronological order: 1. War of Independence against The criminal British government under The Articles of Confederation 2. War of Independence in the separate and sovereign State of Massachusetts (later called Shays's Rebellion) 3. The Constitution enabling the suppression of rebellion, thereby rendering Liberty against the law. 4. The National Conscripted Army invading the separate and sovereign State of Pennsylvania to suppress rebellion against a monopoly banking fraud tax on a competitive currency then in the form of Whiskey. The same forces were at play in Shays's Rebellion as where working during the later Whiskey Rebellion which George Washington suppressed with his conscripted "watermelon" army. There is a need for the reader to know those forces well. The ex-revolutionary soldiers, and other people, on the frontiers were taxed by the new government powers as the new government powers were using their new powers to conduct aggressive wars for profit, and other things, and failing in those goals, the legal monetary units were used to pass on those costs to the tax payers, in the form of inflation, and so the ex-revolutionary soldiers, having just thrown out a criminal government, knew exactly what a criminal government does, and so they rebelled against the new criminal government, in Massachusetts, first, and in Pennsylvania next, and if you read history, there are many more examples of rebellions against criminal governments in other States, and there are examples of records of a State of Franklin, which later became Tennessee, involving similar battles between The People, including ex-revolutionary war volunteers, and new criminal governors, where the new criminal governors wasted no time taking up the same old monetary frauds used by every criminal government that has ever existed in recorded history, as far as I know. So, there you have, a number of things to consider, in measuring the true cost of criminal governments, as they do what they are intended to do, and a history lesson to appraise the current situation by way of relative measure. A. British criminal government B. The People overpower and throw out the criminal government commanded by The British forces. C. An experimental government by the people and for the people, also known as a Democratic Federated Government, that managed to throw out the most powerful army in the planet Earth, with an all volunteer army, with help from the French. D. Examples of new efforts by criminals to suppress rebellion, as the rebels work against those criminals, where the rebels work to remove the criminals from their government, and in the case of the rebellion in Massachusetts, the rebels lost, and the criminals won, the battle, but the war was still in favor of The People, since it was not yet against the law to rebel against a criminal government. E. Examples of new efforts by criminals to suppress rebellions includes a Secret Meeting among conspirators to hatch a plan to usurp the power of moral government and place in place of moral government a Nation State under the false guise of "Federalism", and that effort was led by the known British agent Alexander Hamilton, and the Banker fraud Robert Morris. F. The new leader of the new Nation State, having secured the legal enabling document, suppressed, finally, and so far irrevocably, "so fatal a spirit" as this nonsense called LIBERTY. And if the reader is not yet convinced of the true measure of this lie, I can combine lie #1, with lie #2, to illustrate how those two lies combine to make a more powerful combination, much more powerful than the two lies empower the liars separately, the power of the two lies are much greater than the sum of the two parts. Look back into the official document that has most everyone duped: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html And you won't believe this, it can't be true, it can't be news that is welcome to any freedom loving, friend of liberty, not on the day that Independence is celebrated, but, the text is cut and pasted from the official source, so, you have to crawl back under the rock, dive back into the mire, to secure your state of willful ignorance, and so as to remain stupefied in the face of reality. Or measure the true cost of those lies. Here is the text: Constitution Fact #2: AMENDMENT XIV Lie one is: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ Lie two can be summed up as this: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. If that last quote is not pared down to a comfortable sound bite, for the stupefied, then the following may be sufficient: OBEY Happy 4th |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Getting the 'best price' for a good and attempting to control markets are two VERY different things. No matter what, if you are going to sell something on Craigslist or the classifieds, what 'evil' is there in getting the best possible price a person is *willing* to pay for an item? It doesn't mean the seller is 'evil' - it means he doesn't want to loose on his item, either. One could say that the highest price an item will get is it's 'fair market value'. Overcast, I am going to be as careful as I can in responding to your welcome response, in this discussion. What do you mean by getting the 'best price'? How does that work in your mind? An exchange occurs. Two or even more than two people are involved in an exchange. Actual stuff is exchanged. Who in the exchange gets the 'best price' when the exchange is over and done with, complete, and the "getting" part is history? I am asking so as to quantify the exchange in a measurable way. The exchange will be: 1. "better" for one and not "better" for others (inequitable) 2. "better" for one and "better" for the others (equitable) Which is the goal? The goal can't be a third answer, unless you know something I have yet to know. I suppose we could introduce the concept of charity at this point, but even that factor does not change the measure of equitable exchange relative to inequitable exchange. Which is your version of the goal? What do you mean by "Getting the 'best price' for a good"? Do you mean that the goal is an equitable exchange or do you mean something else? As to the difference between voluntary capitalism and involuntary capitalism I've already covered that with giant walls of text, so you may be writing to anyone, and not exclusively to me. I am fully aware of the difference between voluntary capitalism and involuntary capitalism. Voluntary capitalism ends up as cost price, or equity, since competition forces people to increase quality and lower cost, that is just how it works, and I can offer much in the way of explanation as to why that works that way, but my guess is that you already know how competition works. Involuntary capitalism cannot exist without power transferring from producers of surplus wealth, and then the stolen power is used to destroy all competition where ever and when ever competition arises, which ends, or impedes the force that causes producers to increase quality and lower cost, which, then, allows for more, and more, and more inequitable exchanges, which is the goal for some people. Some people have as their goal in life: inequitable exchanges. In a voluntary association the people who have as their goal in life: inequitable exchanges are no more powerful than someone who has a goal in life that is equitable exchanges, so who cares if someone is a capitalist, or a socialist, in a voluntary association, exchanges are forced down to equity anyway, as a result of the force of competition, as producers are then forced to produce higher quality, at lower cost. No matter what, if you are going to sell something on Craigslist or the classifieds, what 'evil' is there in getting the best possible price a person is *willing* to pay for an item? It doesn't mean the seller is 'evil' - it means he doesn't want to loose on his item, either. One could say that the highest price an item will get is it's 'fair market value'. Evil is defined by me as a willful plan to injure an innocent person followed by the execution of that plan, over, and over, and over, again, and again, proving, defining, evil, in fact. I hope that you are not targeting me with this lesson of quantifying true evil, taking the full measure of it, and avoiding mistakes. If a person plans on injuring an innocent person and then follows through with that plan, that is what the person does, even if he calls himself a capitalist, or a socialist, or a politician, or a lawyer, or a salesperson. What is the goal when a person sets out to cause an inequitable transfer of stuff? You tell me, I try not to do that, and if that happens, I try not to do it again, and penny's, and nickles, and dimes, worth of inequity isn't worth a second's concern on the subject of evil, and how to avoid it. It is merely a saying that someone can be nickle and dime'd to death; although it is food for thought. I've already confessed to the fact that I know that there are many capitalists out there who want me to get the short end of the stick, so therefore, in defense, I too seek to avoid being taken to the cleaners, and in that measure I too seek the best price, which to me is an equitable price, a price that is measurable as cost. What is evil, in your mind, now that you have show (someone) what isn't evil? One could say that the highest price an item will get is it's 'fair market value'. One person's fair market value, based upon calculations chosen by that person, is another person's inequitable price, when other calculations are chosen. It does not matter in an involuntary association, whose calculation is used, since competition will force producers to increase quality and lower cost, which ends up with price being at cost, or very near to cost, depending upon a particular example of the force of competition. Some forces of competition will be very low, such as a Rock Star's Number 1 song, and the price can be jacked up to whatever anyone is willing to pay for that song, and the power of numbers work in such monopolistic supplies of extremely scarce examples of surplus wealth, that each consumer may be willing to pay a fraction of a cent and the producer, absent much competition, gains lots of power, perhaps too much, for his, or her, own good, but even such an example as that, isn't an example that is free from the involuntary association factor; whereby access to mass media is selective, exclusive, and by that measure an enforced reduction in competition. Examples like restaurant meals, where competitors are almost on every other block, in a high population density area, are very good examples of how high forces of competition work, as competitors are forced to continuously raise the bar by increasing quality, and cutting costs. The setting of "price" by the restaurant owner can be any calculation, capitalist, socialist, cost price, whatever calculation imaginable, but it if isn't low enough, for the quality of food produced, compared to the competition, then it isn't a valid calculation. The calculation is meaningless in the face of competition. Competition forces the price down to cost, if quality is equal. It does not matter if a person is a capitalist, seeking inequitable transfers, in a voluntary association, what will matter is how high the competition has raised the quality, and how low the competition has lowered the cost. If the competition is too good, the capitalist, or anyone else, is inspired to find something to do where their specialty is competitive, rather than waste another second failing to compete in a specialty where they are incapable of being competitive. It is the involuntary associations that cause destruction, cause unemployment, cause too much or too little of everything, all the time, on purpose, so as to keep power production down to a manageable level. If that throttling down of production is not throttled down to a manageable level: the victims grow to be powerful enough to defend against legal crime, which is unacceptable for the legal criminals, that will not do for them. The routine of the legal criminals is BOOM and BUST or The Business Cycle, so it is in their best interest to make sure that there is too much, on schedule, and then there is too little, on schedule, so as to keep the victims stupefied, and ready, and willing, to be victimized. Begging for it. Voluntary capitalism, nickle and dime'd, to death, or just short of it, won't be a problem, compared to Involuntary capitalism, and the same measure works for socialism. Voluntary socialism, charity to the point of starvation, will be fine for those whose goal is within reach for them, voluntarily, and compared to Involuntary socialism, there is no comparison, it is the difference between good and evil, night and day, black and white, right and wrong. I am taking care in responding, in my way, which isn't anyone else's way, and anyone can choose to read something better. That's the spin, isn't it? Falsehood is the naked term; without the false fronts, or euphemisms, or spin. Falsehood is produced by liars, deceivers, people who are evil, people who are planning on injuring innocent victims, and the fact that falsehood is now abundant, is a measure of how effective the evil people have become, how powerful they are, in fact. Lies are not accidents. Lies leave trails back to the sources of lies. The spin on the whole thing is how we are fed this 'concept' of these corporations being totally 'capitalist'. When it's not really the case. They create laws and environments where it's close to impossible for the 'normal person' to compete in the market - well, that's not capitalism, maybe it should be called monopolitism. Again, you may be trying to reach anyone, as your words are different version of the perceptions I've been communicating for many years. What is the goal of a capitalist? Any one? A fair price? By what calculation is it fair? 1. "better" for one and not "better" for others (inequitable) 2. "better" for one and "better" for the others (equitable) What is the goal? Is the goal equity, or is the goal not equity? Why mince words, why create complication where no complication is needed, or wanted, who demands unnecessary complication? Is the capitalist goal equity, or not? If the capitalist goal is equity, then the capitalist goal is the same goal as the socialist goal - if socialism is followed back to the beginnings, not the alterations. I've followed capitalism back to the beginnings, not the alterations. Here is what I found: http://mises.org/etexts/menger/two.asp ...every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others. I am still working on the puzzle, your help is appreciated, welcome, needed, and a competitive check on my own quality product (or lack of) and a check on the cost of what I produce (which is very expensive at this point). But that supposed definition is contradictory of itself. Dictionaries help in understanding how language changes, from something effective, into something ineffective. When honest productive people communicate effectively, they are very powerful, and when their communications can be corrupted, they may then fail to accurately identify friend from foe, they may even begin to transfer their earnings to the legal criminals. How many opposite meanings can a word have at the same time? If I say: "Stop running, you are heading off a 100 foot cliff" do you, the runner, have time to check to see if I may be saying: "Run faster, there is a great reward for you on that path."? This society would also insure that government is ran from the bottom up, not the top-down. The idea behind a Democratic Federated Republic, complete with Trial by Jury, appears to be, as far as I've seen so far, the least evil choice. Trial by Jury is the bottom up part. Any person can accuse any other person of wrongdoing, and any one can acquit the supposed criminal. Punishment requires the mutual agreement of 12 people, in the Trial by Jury examples provided by history. Currently there is no Trial by Jury, not here in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Currently the jurors do not have absolute power, since they are conditioned to obey, unconditionally, the orders demanded from them by the Judge. If a juror ignores the judge, and if the juror volunteers to assume absolute power, and get away with it, then Trial by Jury works as intended, bottom up. Any criminal can be judged as innocent by any single individual. Each person is as powerful as each other, and no person is more powerful, legally, than any other single individual, in Trial by Jury, when it works as intended. That renders all laws enforced by any other power - powerless - without the consent of each individual. That is bottom up. It is still evil, if it involves punishment, in my opinion. A criminal, if found guilty, has volunteered, by willfully committing a crime, to exclude him-self, or her-self, from honest productive society, and his reward (which you can say is a form of punishment, but I think you are "playing with words", not me) is exclusion from all that honest productive society has to offer. An effective method of excluding, or avoiding, the known criminals, includes Trial by Jury, and includes well informed, and well armed honest productive people - there are no short cuts. And sending hard earned surplus wealth to legal criminals who then use that power to produce falsehood, and produce threats of violence, and produce punishment upon anyone, guilty or innocent, who threaten that monopoly law power, and that monopoly legal money power, is not a viable solution to the criminal problem. Competitive solutions to the legal crime problem (what I call, merely, The Problem): A. The problem is claimed to be the solution to The problem. B. Democratic Federated Republican forms of governments, legal fictions, that include Trial by Jury, and a competitive legal currency. C. Affective methods by which criminals are disconnected from their victims. The first solution is obviously the problem, and therefore a false solution. The next two solutions may be the same thing, depending, in my mind, on how jurors employ the power to punish, if the power to punish, by the jurors is abused, if it punishes the innocent, then the false solution returns, as The Problem, not the solution. Avoiding, separating from, and not becoming the criminal problem, is the solution to the criminal problem. Making crime legal, is not a solution to the criminal problem. The Democratic Federated Republic (such as The Articles of Confederation experiment, or the Swiss model), as opposed to The Constitution, which is a Nation State, intends to allow competition. A. Democratic Federated Republic allows competition B. Nation State (The Constitution) enforces monopoly The idea, behind a Democratic Federated Republic, is to have experimental governments (which may or may not intend to allow competition or enforce monopoly), and have those experimental governments volunteer to associate, competitively, within a voluntary union, much in the same way that one city, within an experimental government, will compete against another city. The better, higher quality city government, with the lower cost, tends to grow more powerful compared to the worse, lower quality, government, with the higher cost, people vote with their feet, from city to city, voluntarily, even while one city may be resorting to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of vicious, aggressive, violence, against the innocent people withing the city, or without the city, and people can move to the better city, voluntarily, or stay and be victims, if that is what they want, which makes them not victims, at all, it makes them willing participants in whatever the criminals will do. One city employee, a governor of some power, may claim that the next city is abusing it's citizens, and that city collects enough surplus wealth from the city tax payers, and then armed with that collected power supply, they go and they annex the next city, calling that brave move by such a name as spreading democracy, or a rescue mission, or whatever, and The State government, above that city government, may see that move, that annexation, as a criminal gang robbing the poor victims in the next town, and the greater legal power then does something. The State may not see that move to annex as a crime. The employees empowered by that legal fiction may not see that move to "spread democracy" as a crime. The State may encourage such things between cities, by all means, annex each other at will, have at it, and send me my piece of the action. Which State becomes more powerful sooner? How can the legal criminals stop The People from gaining too much power? Look into the events leading up to The Constitution, you will know the answer. The legal criminals cannot allow competition, there can be no competition among sovereign and separate legal fictions, not on the city level, not on the county level, not on the State level, no amount of people can be allowed to compete, whatsoever, as the legal criminals must consolidate all legal power, and all economic power, into one power, one consolidated government, with one leader only, and only one legal currency. You may not believe in the truth; but that does not make the truth go away. Top-down government has proven itself to be of benefit only to a small group of elites, regardless if it's called 'socialism', 'communism', 'a republic', or a 'democracy' - it doesn't matter, the 'top-down' model is self-destructive and will not last. The Constitution was designed to be Top Down, so as to replace, or usurp, the experimental Bottom Up Articles of Confederation, as confessed by the actual people who planned on that very thing happening; and as warned by the people who were against that very thing happening. Two sources: A. The plan to consolidate power into one Nation State: http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 B. Those who blew the whistle and exposed the fraud: http://www.wfu.edu/~zulick/340/henry.html There is much more too it, involving the power over legal money. But that may divert too far off the present topic at this point. This is how our founding fathers framed this country - for small government and small business to run things in their own corner of the world. Which founding fathers? A. The Nationalists (Alexander Hamilton being the prime culprit) who hid behind the false front of Federalism B. The Federalists (who were falsely labeled as Anti-Federalists by the Nationalists) It was the Nationalists who ramrodded The Constitution into being, and doing so by running a very effective false advertisement campaign that targeted the very Mob that the Nationalists claimed to be too dangerous to be allowed to have any legal power - and their point is well taken, by that very example, the very example that they caused. The Nationalists fed a pack of lies, via mass media, at that time, media that they controlled, so as to remove competition among separate and sovereign states, where those states could join or leave the Union under The Articles of Confederation, and the Nationalists used those lies to force those legal fictions, those states, to have to listen to their duped tax payers, and by that fraud The Constitution became the unconditional obedience PATH we are on today, as warned by those who opposed it at the time, and in great detail, all warnings are now true. Which founding fathers are you referring to in your words? Alexander Hamilton, a known British Agent, along with others, like Robert Morris, had as a target, a legal currency monopoly, and The Constitution fraud was the step needed to get to that goal. Those founding fathers? The Nationalists who history is recorded by the winners as The Federalists, as in "The Federalist Papers"? They were Nationalists, or Monarchists, they were hiding behind a thin veil of Federalism, and their opponents blew the whistle, but who listened? Who is listening today? Even James Madison was duped. He later saw his error, and later, after his error took effect, after the Nationalists began their reign of terror, James Madison fought the Nationalists, along side of Thomas Jefferson, both taking their parts in The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. I have a reverence right here: http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentucky-Resolutions/dp/1403963037 I can quote from it, especially the parts referring to how people vote with their feet when a working Democratic Federated Republic works as it is designed to work, and how The Constitution interpreters, of the day, made such things, as competition, against the law. Tax evaders, and slaves, have no place to run, and no place to hide, not in a Nation State. Is this news? This is old news. All other forms of government - have been proven, by history, to be a failure. This one will fail too, not just the 'US' government, but this supposed 'world government'. Mark my words - it WILL fail. I may have news for you, or news for anyone. They do not fail from the eyes of those who cause them to fail. They are meant to fail. They must fail, because failure to have powerful legal fictions failing, amounts to too much power to manage. The top most powerful legal criminals have figured out a long time ago that one powerful legal fiction must not be allowed to grow too powerful, and therefore there must be conflict. There must be a way by which power can be throttled down to a manageable level, war is the answer. I think it is even more fundamentally true to say that, from the perspective of the legal criminals, destruction is the goal, and production is merely a necessary evil, a thing that must be tolerated only so long as enough power is produced to accomplish the goal, which is destruction. Just like these big corporations are starting to implode upon themselves. Again, that is the viewpoint from the eyes of the ready victims, from the perspective of the legal criminals, those legal fictions are merely hosts that will be bled dry and then discarded, according to the overall plan, any, and all, competitors, of any measurable power, must be targeted, access must be gained, all power must be drained out, as quickly as possible, and then the dead, or dying carcass, is left to rot, and to cause the survivors more loss of power, as the survivors expend their scarce remaining power in the futile effort of reviving the victim - beating a dead horse to the point of exhaustion. America is on the BUST cycle, it is on the way out, China is on the Boom cycle, or some other base of operations, no longer America. America has served its useful purpose for the length of time allotted. Regime change is afoot. In a big way. The only ones that will make it - for a time - are the ones that have a bit of control over other big companies and can stay off the implosion for a while. Not forever, but for a while. Anyone, and therefore potentially everyone, except the legal criminals, can avoid all of the effects of the legal crime managed BUST cycle, by merely disconnecting from it, and by merely choosing an alternate currency, legal or otherwise. Do you want an example? How about the work being done by Elon Musk with his 3 very competitive companies called: Space X Tesla Motors Solar City Elon Musk was formerly involved in Pay Pay. Read this: http://www.amazon.com/PayPal-Wars-Battles-Media-Planet/dp/0977898431/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1310063109&sr=1-1 Pay Pal Wars, Battles With Ebay, the Media, the Mafia, And the Rest of Planet Earth Currently, as far as I know, Tesla motors will make the best Electric Cars in the world, and they will do so, paying the highest wages, and they will do so despite all the power being stolen from their customers, as that stolen power flows to their competitors as subsidies. Do you understand the full measure of just how competitive an American based productive manufacturer can be, in the face of immeasurable odds against success? Elon Musk was famous, during Pay Pal Wars, for taking part in collecting start up capital, from investors, so as to begin producing high quality and low cost risky products: Pay Pal was a pioneer in the on-line currency industry. Then, in 2008, when the legal criminals began BUSTING the American economy, by removing credit access, and at the same time DOUBLING the dollar supply, and spending that DOUBLE the entire supply of legal dollar units, somewhere, much of it going to the competition in China, the famous Elon Musk was unable to find investment capital to expand his already profitable Electric Car production, for some strange reason. Elon Musk ended up going off-shore, for capital, so as to continue the plan to corner the Electric Car market, world-wide, with his California based new car factory. You know, the supposed worst place on earth to conduct honest productive business, where the "liberals" cost the manufacturers too much useless regulations, and where wages are forced too high by those terrible Unions, etc. Elon Musk went to Germany, and to Japan, for capital, and as far as I know to date, Tesla is back on schedule, despite all the efforts to BUST America, by cutting off the flow of credit, capital, and by stealing, by way of inflation, all the surplus wealth in American, by DOUBLING the supply of money, just in 2008, and then by further inflation, stealing, euphemistically called "quantitative easing", and where does that capital go? It goes to destroy. It goes to produce deception. It goes to finance threats of violence. It is employed in the work of destruction. It is used to throttle down the production of power to a manageable level, and it goes to destroy competition where ever, and when ever competition arises. And you can claim that China is being competitive. Really? The power produced by honest productive people is stolen, by fraud, and then sent to pay off the people who criminally injure innocent people in China, causing injury by way of terrible pollution, causing injury by way of terrorizing debt, causing injury by way of excessive work hours exchanged for less than living wages, and all the profits realized from the sale of all those "competitive" products just so happen to accumulate in very same, very few, bank accounts, denominated in whichever legal currency is engineered to be the highest in power to purchase that day. You call that competition? Not you, specifically, you anyone who is wearing that shoe, that badge of stupidity. Henry Ford for two: 1. http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Henry_Ford/ There is one rule for the industrialist and that is: Make the best quality of goods possible at the lowest cost possible, paying the highest wages possible. When did the capitalist's brains turn to mush? How about when they resorted to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence? 2. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henryford136294.html It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. I may be reading too much in between the lines, on that one, but to me that says that a revolution can happen over night, because the revolution occurs in our minds - first. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, I have a few moments to invest in communicating an accurate perspective, and an honest perspective, and a useable perspective, to anyone who will listen. My thinking, while listening to Alex Jones, on the subject of U.S. Marines being sent into Libya, to torture, and to mass murder, and to be tortured, and to be mass murdered, so as to keep smiles on the faces of a few who are made happy with torture, and mass murder. My thinking goes directly to a term, and once you hear the term you are then going to open a door into your mind, as the term triggers memories, and the term causes a response within your soul, within your living being, you will measure the full measure of the term, as best you can, and you will understand the meaning of the term, but, and here is the thing you may want to know, the shoe may soon be on the other foot. Unconditional Surrender. Alex Jones switched gears from the subject of U.S. Marines being sent, soon, to invade Libya, in a new war of aggression, for the profit of a few, paid for by many. I'm sticking with the term offered: Unconditional Surrender. The leaders of Japan were given an offer they could not refuse in 1945 as such (reportedly): A. Unconditional Surrender That was the choice. Here is what that choice looks like: http://www.leftcom.org/en/articles/2005-08-01/holocaust-and-hiroshima-imperialism-and-mass-murder-in-the-twentieth-century It seems clear that even without the atomic bomb attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring unconditional surrender. I looked for images of absolute destruction and found that link instead, and it is a left leaning link, a perspective that misses the point, but manages to illustrate half of the point. The other half of the point is false. A. Unconditional Surrender. That is the point. The false half (added to the true half): A. Unconditional Surrender. B. Not A There is no choice, and that is the truth, and that is the point, and so, to you, the reader, now, you have, a choice, and later, perhaps not so much. A living being will know the full measure of death best, when dead, of course, but during life a living being may reach a peak moment of awareness, and at that time, at that moment, as long as that moment lasts, the living being may truly appreciate the full measure of death, know it, understand it, and realize it, and at that most aware moment of death, the living being truly knows, as best as humanly possible, and that moment may not necessarily occur just before death. A living being may experience that moment well before death, as old age, disease, self-imposed stupidity, and long exposure to brainwashing, too much exposure to response conditioning, too much behavioral modification, too much false advertisements, excessive indoctrination, mind numbing drugs, mental deterioration of any kind whatsoever, can reduce the capacity of the living being to reach that peak moment of the full, unadulterated, appreciation of death. Death is relative to life. Life is the measuring device, from which death is compared, competitively, and in stark contrast, and therefore that peak moment, in life, when a person does experience that epiphany, that moment, that knowing most time of intimate awareness, may well be the same moment in life, when life, to that living being, is measured as the most valuable moment. You are living here, happy as a clam. Then you are facing Unconditional Surrender? It is not uncommon. The shoe is on the other foot. What it is like? Can you ask someone who is dead, someone that had to surrender, unconditionally? How about someone who is brain dead? Can a brain dead person supply the demand for insight here? How about someone who is so well trained, so heavily sedated with brainwashing data, so caught up in falsehood, so deep in the mire: do they know, will they have the power to supply that same demand for insight now? You may have to use your own imagination. When The Dollar Hegemony is done, when it is no longer needed by the legal criminals, and when the new power takes over, the shoe will be on the other foot, and in order to get to that goal, it may very well be experienced by the former citizens of The Dollar Hegemony, the victims, the ready victims, the victims begging for more power flowing to their dollar, from the sources of power that flow comes from, it may be their time to know the full measure, and the full meaning of Unconditional Surrender. What does that look like, when being on the short end of that stick? Raise you hand if you really, really, want to know. Keep feeding them, and you will know. This: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That is designed to cause Unconditional Surrender, or have you been led to believe in fairy tales? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, Ron Paul now has an article published on the Lew Rockwell web site and we can read it. Here is the link: http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul751.html The title: Competing Currencies – a Defense Against Profligate Government Spending I tend to add my own comments, and the title inspired a comment even before reading the article. Competition forces quality up and cost down. Monopoly is the measurable absence of that force, or monopoly is measurable as a force that makes the force of competition powerless. The monopoly money suppliers are the same thing as the monopoly Nation State, it is one and the same thing, it is run by the same people, and those same people may not even be legal "citizens" of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Ron Paul, for example, is not a member of the legal money monopoly cartel, or a competitive member of The Government of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), if he was a competitor, he would be powerful, and if he were powerful, he would end the monopoly, because his advertized intentions are opposite the acts perpetrated by the criminals running the money monopoly extortion racket and the monopoly power Nation State. 1. Bring Troops Home 2. Competing Currencies (legal competition) My comment is that Ron Paul is working toward a change in the law whereby competition in money markets is legal, and no longer against the "National" law. I have yet to read the article. I've been reading Ron Paul's articles for about 25 years. On to the article: Throughout history, gold and silver have been the two commodities that have most fully satisfied the requirements of sound money. That is demonstrably not accurate, but not necessarily false, and as far as I know, or guess, that is not an intentional deception. I plan on being at the Reno Nevada Liberty Conference, and if I get a chance I will ask if those types of inaccurate statements are intentionally false, so as to mislead the ignorant masses, and so as to profit by that use of deception. The last time I went to one of those conferences my questions were willfully ignored, and then one of the speakers answered my questions in a general way by saying: "If you can't beat'em: Join'em." Gold bugs have been around for a long time, claiming the superiority of gold as money, but their claims are only valid in their own eyes, while most everyone else prefer less costly forms of money, or more accurate, higher quality, more powerful, better money, of various forms, not limited to: Food Oil Electricity Stamp Script Land There are many examples of each form of money, as money, and only in cases where legal monopoly extortion money is enforced are there cases whereby people are forced to use lower quality money, such as Whiskey, as a replacement money, or black market money, including gold and silver. Back to the article: This is why people around the world are flocking once again to gold and silver as a store of value to replace their rapidly depreciating paper currencies. I've read where the people who are running the Chinese government are among the people who are buying up, or stealing, or by any way they manage, I can't know, they are transferring gold from where gold was to where they now have control over it. That exposes one of the great costs of using gold as money. One monopoly power may use great force to gain large quantities of gold and then that large quantity of gold constitutes a very powerful market force as explained by mathematical illustration: Suppose everyone using Gold as money use 100 percent of the total supply of Gold, and that use of 100 percent of the supply of Gold by everyone continues for 100 years without any change at all in the total supply of Gold that is used by everyone. Then at the start of the second century after the century long use of 100 percent of the total supply of Gold being used by everyone, the people in China begin to transfer control of 51% of the total supply of Gold, and they store all the gold they can get their hands on into one vault, call that Vault by a name, such as Fort Knocks-off. Now everyone else has to get used to using half of the total supply of Gold, when they had grown very used to using 100 percent of the supply of Gold, since China took 51% out of circulation. China also kept their plans a secret, and in order to keep their plan a secret they sent out false advertisements that intended to send their victims on wild goose chases; while they perpetrated half of the crime of the century. The other half of the crime of the century, by China, in this illustration, is to then flood the market with 51 percent of the gold, after another century goes by, as everyone became used to using 49 percent of the gold for another 100 centuries. A. Everyone becomes accustomed to 100 percent of the total supply of Gold. B. China secretly takes out 51 percent of the supply on their secret, exclusively known, schedule, while they fool everyone into thinking the opposite is happening. C. China floods the market with 51 percent of the total Gold supply once everyone else grows accustomed to getting by with only 49 percent of the total supply of Gold, also done with exclusive knowledge of that fact; and also done while everyone else is scratching their heads, and wondering why strange things are happening. Back to the article: Even central banks have come to their senses and have begun to stock up on gold once again. How much Gold is in Fort Knox? Does Ron Paul know something I don't know? As far as I know there hasn't been an accurate, and full, audit of The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, ever, and as far as I know Ron Paul has reported that to be a fact, that no audit has been done, and therefore there is no public access information concerning how much Gold is in Fort Knox, or The Federal Reserve Banks, or anywhere on American soil. I'd like to know the truth. Would you like to know the truth? How powerful is that information? How much gold is currently controlled by who? A. China B. U.S.A. C. Europe D. Libya E. The Federal Reserve System employees (those who order transfers of gold) F. Goldman Sachs G. Wall Street E. International Monetary Fund F. The World Bank G. Russia How about the actual top 10 legal fictions where ownership of the 10 largest supplies of Gold and Silver are housed? How valuable is that information? Will someone be targeting those supplies of that much power? Someone is targeting the gold in Libya, or am I making up fairy tails? But in our country today, attempting to use gold and silver as money is severely punished, regardless of the fact that it is the only constitutionally-allowed legal tender! That is another measure of the high cost of using money: even the legal criminals know how to get their pound of flesh from those who use gold and silver as money. In some cases, most likely, actual pounds of flesh. Can you imagine the screams? In one recent instance, entrepreneurs who attempted to create their own gold and silver currency were convicted by the federal government of "counterfeiting". Legal criminals using law to outlaw competitive money is not a new story. The case where the legal criminals in Massachusetts, under The Articles of Confederation, passing a tax law on Whiskey, payable in Gold, is one famous case of legal criminals using law to outlaw competitive money, and back then the ex-revolutionary war soldiers, like Daniel Shays, kept the spark of liberty going, and they took up arms against those legal crimes, because liberty, according to them, was worth fighting for, and it was worth fighting the fight against legal crime, and it was even legal to fight the fight against legal crime, under The Articles of Confederation, and that is why the Nationalists, like Alexander Hamilton, and Robert Morris, had to conduct their regime change events that became known as The Constitutional Convention, and the false advertizement campaign known as The Federalist Papers, whereby the authors claimed to be working to toward "a more perfect union" when in fact they were constructing a Consolidated, Monopoly, Law power, or Nation State, with the aim of creating, and maintaining The First Bank of the United States, and when that failed, the aim was to create a Second Bank of the United States, and when that failed to take hold, the aim finally resulted in The Federal Reserve System of Extortion still in operation today. And that is all recorded in history by the people who were making history, and not recorded by victors who re-write, or revise, and falsify history. The next famous case of legal criminals using law to outlaw competitive money was called, by the victors, The Whiskey Rebellion, perpetrated after rebellion against legal crime became a crime, according to the constructively interpreting interpreters of The Constitution as The Constitution was designed to be constructively interpreted, by it's legal crime inventors, supporters, and enforcers. That is all well reported by those who were there when it was happening, if you care to know, if you care to look, and if that information is at all valuable to you, as you scratch your head wondering, what is going on these days? Also, consider another case of an individual who was convicted of tax evasion for paying his employees with silver and gold coins rather than fiat paper dollars. Yes, and while you are at it, consider the following: http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904 The Nazi government made the use of competitive currencies against the law as the force of competition began to dilute the criminal power of the criminal Nazi government, which should be all too familiar a story to the victims of criminal governments, past, present, and future. By why know that which is painful? Why torture yourself? Why not, simply, avoid being a victim? Well, don't you have to know how? I will read on, with the article by Ron Paul. The federal government acknowledges that such coins are legal tender at their face value, as they were issued by the U.S. government. But when it comes to income taxes owed by the employees who received them, the IRS suddenly deems the coins to be worth their full market value as precious metals. How about a history lesson for all you honest productive American people demanding accurate knowledge? The legal criminals have an "interest" in borrowing from Honest Productive People, using the Good Faith and Credit of those Honest Productive People, and then once the legal criminals have some of that power, they begin spending that power to purchase all the work needed to fool the Honest Productive People into thinking that The Honest Productive People owe the legal criminals money, for having allowed the legal criminals to borrow money, and then, on top of that, those legal criminals spend even more of that stolen power in the work that is necessary to convince the fools that they owe interest to those criminals for the crime of having lent them power in the first place. Then they add zeros to their accounts, write themselves bonuses, buy your children to eat while raping them, or who knows what else. Now, you may say, Joe, it isn't that bad. Really? Who is the fool? I'll raise my hand. I'm writing about actual reality, how foolish can I get? Who demands facts? Joe Friday? The sweet deal isn't new. The criminals gain so much power so fast that they can't spend it all, they can conduct failed aggressive wars for profit, as they did before Shays's Rebellion, as the "mercantile interests" sold "the government" the supplies to conduct raids into Canada, to Annex land from "hostile natives", or "enemies of the state", or "hostile states", at high, no bid, prices, above market prices. Got that? You get the license to supply the aggressive criminal invading army and you jack up the price because there is no competitor, you have the exclusive license. This is history, this is what happened just before Shays's Rebellion in the State of Massachusetts, under The Articles of Confederation, which constituted The law of the Land, in between the time after The British were driven out of The Colonies, and the involuntary association, or despotism, known as The Constitution. There was a time when there was a working Democratic Federated Republican experimental government here, in this land called America. Really. The legal criminals running the separate and sovereign Massachusetts State government ran up huge state debts, failing to "Annex" parts of Canada, and so they owed large sums of money to the suppliers of war materials, and those suppliers demanded gold as payment, go that, and those suppliers didn't want to be paid in fraudulent Massachusetts extortion racket money, which they knew was devalued, and used to pay workers, and mercenaries, and low level government employees, and desperate sellers of land, and desperate sellers of anything, as the fraudulent money drove out actual money, which was gold, at that time, and then, being resourceful, the people at the edges of the criminal separate and sovereign State of Massachusetts, on the Frontier, the ex-revolutionary war veterans, the farmers, began to produce their own home grown money, in the form of Whiskey. They used Whiskey as currency. Then the legal criminals, the mercantile interests, the banking interests running their banking interest scams, taxed Whiskey PAYABLE IN GOLD. There was no gold. Get it? Do you realize the full measure of the fraud yet? How absurd can the legal criminals get? Taxing ex-revolutionary war soldiers who know exactly why all the gold was driven out of the State by the abuse of the legal money power, where those same ex-revolutionary war soldiers, the smart ones, the educated ones, those self-educated ones, knew that the mercantile interests had profited from The War for Independence, selling war supplies that never arrived, or arrived too late, or arrived as poor quality poor substitutes for what was needed, and they knew that the suppliers where paid in gold, and they knew that the suppliers had no-bid contracts, and exclusive licenses, and they knew that their own pay, the pay paid to the revolutionary war soldiers, for having drove off the British legal criminals, was worthless banking fraud paper money, not powerful colonial script, not gold, not silver, and not competitive money, and they knew that their farms were badly maintained, in their absence, and they knew that they were facing foreclosure, and they knew that the banks legally devalued the legal currency, and they new that the mortgagers demanded gold, not funny money, and they knew the score, and so they continued the war for independence, against the new criminal bosses, after having driven out the old ones, but they failed, they were defeated by the legal criminals running the Massachusetts State government; which was then a sovereign and separate State within an experimental Democratic Federated Republic under The Articles of Confederation. They went to Vermont, a better, higher quality, and lower cost State in the voluntary Union. How nice can it get? Who do you think was sent the bill for all expenses consumed by the legal criminals as they crushed "so fatal a spirit" in Massachusetts, as those criminal governors suppressed that legal rebellion, crushing that same Spirit of 1776? What did the legal criminals demand as payment to cover expenses when they decided to crush that rebellion, from those who paid for all those expenses? A. Gold B. Their own fraud money C. Punishment (for failure to pay) It isn't a puzzle. It is a routine. Buy stuff with the legal fraud money, and demand payment in things of value, titles to land, whatever has more power to purchase. The federal government acknowledges that such coins are legal tender at their face value, as they were issued by the U.S. government. But when it comes to income taxes owed by the employees who received them, the IRS suddenly deems the coins to be worth their full market value as precious metals. When they are backed into a corner, by their competitors, when they lose World Reserve Currency Status, to their competitors, they will demand from you, something that they know that you don't have, and you had better get it, fast, or else. Is that simple to understand? This is not news. This is an old, old, old, routine. In one word: Obey That is it. That is as simple as that story gets. That is the sound bite. That is the entire message. Any additional text is still the same message, just greater detail, same message. These cases highlight the fact that a government monopoly on the issuance of money is purely a method of central control over the economy. If you can be forced to accept the government's increasingly devalued dollar, there is no limit to how far the government will go to debauch the currency. Anyone who attempts to create a market based currency – meaning a currency with real value as determined by markets – threatens to embarrass the federal government and expose the folly of our fiat monetary system. So the government destroys competition through its usual tools of arrest, confiscation, and incarceration. That is a kinder way of reporting the facts. Ron Paul is kinder, he is a medical doctor, a kind man. I'm not so kind. The legal criminals are not making a mistake, they are not fools, their system is not failing, it is working perfectly for them at the top, it is designed to destroy the production of surplus wealth, and destroy all competition where ever and when ever competition arises, and it is designed to transfer all power to the few who know, accurately, just exactly how well the criminal operation is working, and you don't, it is a secret. Even questioning it is against the law. Ron Paul is committing a crime by questioning it. You doubt the accuracy of my report to you? Forget about me. Look at the actual law: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html AMENDMENT XIV You can't, for the life of you, connect those dots? The gap is too wide? Too much construction on my part? Too much reading between the lines? I'm fabricating falsehoods? I am? This is why I have taken steps to restore the constitutional monetary system envisioned and practiced by our Founding Fathers. Which founding fathers? Alexander Hamilton? Alexander Hamilton was a Nationalists and the actual people who supported a working Democratic FEDERATED Republican form of government experiment, in opposition to those Nationalists, where called by the Nationalists: Anti-Federalists. There were two, separate, and competitive founding father groups. A. The Nationalists (flying a false flag of Federalism) B. Those who supported Federalism (those who were called Anti-Federalists by the Nationalists, and the mud stuck) Which founding fathers? Hamilton wanted a National Bank, based upon the British model, a debt based system of criminal control. Which founding fathers? Benjamin Franklin has been quoted as being in support of Stamp Script, which was reported to be the working legal money used in the colonies before The British outlawed Stamp Script use in The Colonies. Ron Paul may be cutting his report down to a sound bite, which he is exceptionally capable of doing, in the effort to reach more people, sooner, a measure of expedience. I'm not so disciplined, as you are probably fully aware. I recently introduced HR 1098, the Free Competition in Currency Act. This bill eliminates three of the major obstacles to the circulation of sound money: federal legal tender laws that force acceptance of Federal Reserve Notes; "counterfeiting" laws that serve no purpose other than to ban the creation of private commodity currencies; and tax laws that penalize the use of gold and silver coins as money. During this Congress I hope to hold hearings on this bill in order to highlight the importance of returning to a sound monetary system. Specialists are hired by employers to work out details of things that require a special discipline, even talent. Editors, for example. Some employers hire liars. Some do so on purpose. Some are fools. I do not think that Ron Paul is a paid liar, he is exceptional in that regard, in that place, in that den of thieves. He is the exception to that rule, and that rule has been enforced since 1788, on that dark day of ratification, against the very detailed warnings reported by the opponents of that usurpation, what it will bring, and what it did bring into being. Allowing market participants to choose a sound currency will ensure that individuals' needs are met, rather than the needs of the government. Restoring sound money will restrict the ability of the government to reduce the citizenry's purchasing power and burden future generations with debt. Unlike the current system which benefits the Fed and its banking cartel, all Americans are better off with a sound currency. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSJVV-Hvk2g&feature=related Honest Productive Americans, I need to clarify what I mean when I address the honest, productive, Americans. When competition is legal, people are honest, because each lie comes around and bites each honest productive person in the ass, so they learn, to stop lying, they learn that lying doesn't pay, they learn that in the short term a lie may avoid some unpleasant thing, but they learn, that a lie will weaken them eventually. Failure to learn, is the same road that results in failure to produce, when someone else has learned, and has managed to learn how to increase the quality of production, and lower the cost, by avoiding lying, so as to be in a position to learn. You may be confused by my words, and I can help you with that confusion, as I resort to someone who understands how lies can most certainly get way out of hand, and the full measure of just how horrible those lies bite people in the ass, is realized. I will offer to those honest productive Americans, who are still honest, and who are still producing, the following link, and the specific quote from the link, and then I will choose words that intend to unravel any confusion that may be left in the minds of the readers now reading this report. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/solzhenitsyn/nobel-lit1970.htm Alexander Solzhenitsyn Nobel Lecture (1970) We will be told: What can literature do against the pitiless onslaught of naked violence? Let us not forget that violence does not and cannot flourish by itself; it is inevitably intertwined with LYING. Between them there is the closest, the most profound and natural bond: nothing screens violence except lies, and the only way lies can hold out is by violence. Whoever has once announced violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose lying as his PRINCIPLE. At birth, violence behaves openly and even proudly. But as soon as it becomes stronger and firmly established, it senses the thinning of the air around it and cannot go on without befogging itself in lies, coating itself with lying's sugary oratory. It does not always or necessarily go straight for the gullet; usually it demands of its victims only allegiance to the lie, only complicity in the lie. There is no way that anyone can lie and make anyone else believe that something ugly is beautiful. That is the message. In the face of actual beauty, actual love, actual peace, actual harmony, actual honesty, actual productivity, actual reason, actual intelligence, actual knowledge, actual truth, actual common sense, the lie is found wanting, struggling, and resorting to violence. Violence is the part that bites YOU in the ass, the liar eventually pays, the intended victim of the lie pays at first, and then, perhaps, that victim decides to join in on lying as a means of earning a living, lying to one's self, then lying to others, and in so doing all the beauty in the world takes second stage, as the first lie requires a second, and two lies require four, and the human spirit no longer has any room left to appreciate anything other than an absolute demand for lies, and when those lies no longer work, the liar has very few choices left, and none of which are more lies, but every one is relatively beautiful by comparison to the road chosen that leads to absolute ruin, except one. 1. Choose violence as a means of "earning" a living, consuming that which honest productive people have produced. 2. Suffer all accountability associated with each lie you embraced all the way back to the start, where you, earning, trust, once again. 3. Return to honest productive life, just like everyone else who knows how to earn their time on Earth - eventually. Lies replace all things beautiful, unless torture is beautiful to you, but then you would not be an Honest Productive American. Each penny earned, or each whatever legal money unit is used to measure surplus wealth, is earned honestly, stealing is not earning, and this isn't a lesson in semantics. If there is a lot of surplus wealth, which there is, obviously, if you can get past all the lies told to you by the naked emperors, you see honest people producing, because that is a requirement, honestly is a requirement, if you don't stop lying, you can't compete, you are lying to steal, you are not lying to earn a damn thing. It isn't semantics. Prostitutes are not in business to earn their way back to virginity. You may find one that argues, semantically, that that is what they are doing, as you may be paying one, I don't know, I'm just saying, a kettle is a kettle, a pot is a pot, because that is what they are, and they are not something else, no matter what other word is used as a label. Legal competition is a good way to help the reader understand that which is diametrically opposed to legal crime; like night and day, and like good versus evil, one exists as people define it, by their actions, and by the actions that are driven by their thoughts, and that is what that is, if it is legal competition, that is what it is, and if it is legal crime, then that it what it is, not both at the same time, one is in daylight, and the other is in the dark of night, one is good, the other is evil. Legal criminals may want to call other legal criminals bad, hey, you, look over there, that is a very, very, very, bad person: while that one is picking your pocket. A legal criminal may add, while pointing out another legal criminal, that, hey, I'm here to help, which is half true, one legal criminal is point out another one, warning you, unless it is a lie, and the one pointing is pointing at an honest productive American. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, but beware of Greeks bearing "gifts". The false front is such that the intended, targeted, powerless, ready, willing, able, victim, is supposed to believe in the lie that the legal criminal is an honest productive person, while the victim's pocket is picked, for torture, or for murder, as more victims are thrown on the pile. Read Solzhenitsyn, he's been there, and done that. When everyone is lying, when everyone joins the legal crime ring, what do you think happens? Who is left to produce anything? Who has time to do anything other than obey? Now, please, return to the link at the top of the page, as there are three separate perspectives offered on the subject of people defining the methods by which people hold other people to account. They are not speaking about Trial by Jury; which is one way that people hold other people to account. They are not speaking about Trial by Lies; or our current system of "Justice" which has not been Trial by Jury, since the constructive interpreters of The Constitution outlawed that form of competition, which is not a method by which people hold other people to account, as our current system of Trial by Lies is legal crime, if ever there was legal crime - not to say that there aren't any cases of honest people still managing to hold other honest people to account, competitively, despite the laws that enable law enforcers to out-law competition. The people in the video linked at the top of the page are speaking about how people, competitively, hold other people to account, honestly, and accurately, for each of their honest measures of production. They are talking about currency, or money, or whatever method is chosen by whomever, and whenever, anyone holds anyone else, honestly, and accurately, to account for their relative production. Their RELATIVE production. If there is only one person, put on your thinking caps, is there any need for money? Alex Jones is an artist, in the full sense that Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn reports, as the source of power that will defeat open violence, or destruction, or crime, or legal crime, and Alex Jones brings to that table, in that video, a neutral perspective, as the other two perspectives offer competitive alternatives as to what constitutes a more competitive currency. Alex Jones is, in essence, a medium of exchange, Alex Jones is a conduit, a form of currency, a wire that connects competitor A with competitor B, and anyone else connected to those two competitive definitions of currency. Are you confused? Bill Still offers a whole lot of information to define the type of currency competition that has been recorded in history, and he offers his opinion as to which ones work to accomplish specific things, and you can view a fuller measure of that explanation in such videos documentaries as: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXt1cayx0hs http://www.themoneymasters.com/ The other perspective at that table, where Alex Jones is the neutral connecting medium, more or less, is The Austrian School of Economics, or The Gold Bugs, or whomever, or whatever, represents that defining medium of exchange that is somehow related to Gold, or to Silver and Gold, or to lesser, and lesser, and lesser degrees, to other precious metals, such as platinum, or even lesser, to other commodities - perhaps - depending upon whose professing the Gold Bug profession. Here is a test for anyone, anywhere, when the professor professes the existence of a free market, as something real, and something measurable, and something definable - ask - is deception present in that free market? If it is, then, what is it? If the professor dodges the question, you have the answer. If deception is present in that free market, that one that the professor professes, then it isn't free of deception - by definition. If it is free of deception, then it is free from violence, again, read Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn, and know the full measure of the link between falsehood and violence. If it is free of deception, and therefore free of violence, how did it get that way? See? You have to ask the right questions. Honest productive people made the free market, they are it, they define it, and they don't need an interpreter to explain it. It is what it is, where it is, and it is free of deceit, to the limits of human capacity to avoid deception, and it is free of violence, again within the limits of how well, or how poorly, honest productive people can avoid resorting to violence, and it is free of criminals, as honest productive people manage to avoid being criminals, and as honest productive people manage to avoid the criminals, and especially the legal criminals. Which currency do the honest productive people choose, when they have a choice, in a free market, free of deception, and all that goes with deception? They don't need an expert telling them to make the right choice, and this is where you get to hear my offering, which isn't Bill Stills offering, and it isn't The Gold Bugs offering (you may be able to guess their expert opinion on which money is best), and it isn't anyone's offering other than mine, but my offering is based upon something that has also occurred in history. There was a guy, once, who offered a concept to the world, and he even invented his own printing press to help him spread the word, against the forces of monopoly, or as I like to call it: legal crime. The concept is called The Cost Principle. The idea is such that if things are sold at cost, then the full measure of Surplus Wealth (which is that which is produced but not immediately consumed, or, the amount of production that is present in excess of consumption): the full measure of Surplus wealth will be a universal reduction in total costs of living. It is simple, but you have to cut through years of behavioral modification, brainwashing, response conditioning, and blind obedience to falsehood, to realize the simplicity of the cost principle. There is a way to see this cost principle stuff from a conservative, republican, gold bug, free market, viewpoint too, if you can't get past all the brainwashing. What happens when two or more competitors are dreaming up a price that they will advertize on their products when only a few consumers are busy shopping for those products? Competitor A prices his at cost from the start. Competitor B jacks up his price twice the cost he spent on producing it. Competitor C looks at the price from A and B and competitor C lowers his price lower, increases his quality higher, and cuts his cost down below the other prices. Are you confused? The subject is money, or currency, and currency is a better name, and money is an older name, both names are meant to point to the same thing, but there, in that duplicity, is a way to understand, instead of remaining confused. Many forms of money can compete, do compete, and will continue to compete, unless there is a force that makes competition against the law, or unless there is a force that ends competition, a force that has nothing to do with "official" law. If there is no competition, there is no force to inspire producers to increase quality and lower cost, as a rule, or as an economic law, on a law book, or not on a law book, it doesn't matter, the fact of it is a fact, even if you don't want to see it, sticking your head in the sand doesn't make it go away. Competition is a force, and it forces quality up, and it forces cost down, because that is what competition does, live with it, or outlaw it, whichever you prefer, but who do you think will pay the cost of living, when there is no competition? You tell me. Which form of money is the highest quality and the lowest cost? This isn't a quiz, there is a highest quality money, and it is at the lowest cost, compared to all the other competitors, and either you know what it is, or you don't, and you don't need an expert, and you don't need an official, and you don't need a professor, and you don't need me, or Bill Still, or Alex Jones, or a professed member of the Gold bug club to find it. Here is a quiz: Is it a good idea to find the highest quality money at the lowest cost? If you think not, then you are thinking just like a legal criminal, you may be one, or an accessory to their crimes, as you lend both political, or psychological, and material, or economic, support to them, as they torture, and as they mass murder, millions of innocent victims, in their effort to end all competition in money markets. If Bill Still has the power to offer you a better money, a higher quality money, and a lower cost money, do you even know it? If you don't know it, how can you choose? If the Gold Bugs offer you a better money, higher quality, and lower cost, to you: choose it. What is stopping you? You don't know? Does that sound like ignorance to you? Does it sound like stupidity? Does the guy in the beard, in the video, offer a higher quality, and lower cost to you money? You don't know? "I'll take whatever that guy over there is buying?" "I'll go with the flow?" Currency flows. Does money flow? Wouldn't it be nice to sit and do nothing while everyone else pays you to sit there doing nothing? Can everyone sit and do nothing while everyone else pays everyone else to sit there and do nothing? Can everyone grow rich by lying to everyone else, and when that doesn't work, everyone threatens everyone else, and when that doesn't work everyone tortures everyone else, and when that doesn't work, everyone murders everyone else? Who pays the cost of living? What happens to the cost of living? What is the full measure of the highest quality currency; whereby the product, this currency stuff, accurately manages to account for who produces how much so as to know how much that person has earned, so as to exchange that measure of earning for anything else needed, or wanted, which is produced by someone else, who has also managed to measure up his, or her, productivity, and do so precisely, in relation to some, knowable, standard of value? How about life? Is life a standard of value? How much does life cost? When the one and only person who is the record breaking torturing mass murderer to date walks into your store to buy something that you have worked hard, honestly, and without resort to deceit, and without resort to threats of violence, and without resort to willful acts of terrible violence upon the innocent, to make, he wants what you made, and that torturing mass murder extraordinaire offers you the full measure of what he has earned, his money, in exchange of the thing you have for sale, do you take his blood money at your price, or do you jack up your price, just for that one customer, or do you give your life to him, or does he just take you life: slowly? How much is a torturing mass murderer paid, per torture victim? Do you get it? Are you still confused? What is the value of a finger nail taken off of an innocent child? Is that a high quality standard of value? Is that a competitive standard of value, usable in producing, and maintaining, a high quality currency, at a low cost to you? Do you need a standard of value? A. Yes, I need a standard of value. B. No, too much trouble for, me, I have a lot of work to do, and not much time. C. Yes, and the standard should be based upon a measure of how much someone can destroy someone else, the more destruction the better. D. Yes, and you are probably right, life, or the cost of maintaining life, may actually be a good standard of value, or standard of living type thing: it sounds reasonable, so far. E. Conspiracy Theorist - where is your tin hat? No? How do you know a good deal from you being taken to the cleaners? How do you know when you are paying too much? How do you know when you are working way too hard, and there is nothing to show for all your work, nothing, you have nothing, and you have to work harder, and harder, and you get less, and less, each new day, you have to work harder, each new day, you have less to show for it, and can you now realize that that is a standard. That would be your standard, that day, and then, the next day, you work even harder, and you have even less to show for it, and that is now, your new standard. How much work did you do the first day of work? How much did you get as a reward for that first day of work, on that first day? That was the standard. Then, time went by, each new day, more work, less pay, until today. Now you are at the new standard. What happened? The legal criminals are running an extortion racket with a legal money monopoly. Where have you been? They have a standard of value. Everyone else must work more, to send them more, and that is that standard of value. They torture, and they mass murder, and you pay them to do it. How much is one nail taken off of one innocent toddler worth to you? You don't know, yet you still pay that bill when that bill is sent to you. Bill Still has a competitive offering of higher quality and lower cost money. The Gold Bugs have a competitive offering of higher quality and lower cost money. Which money are you choosing? Is it a free market? What makes it less than a free market? Failure to work for dollars will result in you working for dollars, one way or the other, and if you find a way out, you are the exception, not the rule, when everyone finds a way out, there will be something known as regime change. Regime change is the order of the day, coming to a theater near you, and if you think the dollar was bad, worth getting out from under, what do you think the new bosses are going to dictate to you? I've worked long enough on this, for now. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/orig10/galland33.1.html Honest Productive Americans, The brain trust at Gold Bug center have put their heads together so as to solve the money problems facing all of you honest productive Americans, and if you believe that, I'd like to know how you believe that, because I don't. Question: So, let me ask you the same question, do you see any way out? Are there any options left to the government that don’t lead to economic chaos? Non-answer (reading from the false script): If by some miracle the people who run the government decided that Big Government was a bad idea and small government was a much better idea, and so they set about ending government programs and pushing the level of federal spending way down, along with the level of regulation over the economy, then there would be a way out. How can someone claim to be an authority on money in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) and be asked that question, and then not aim directly at the FOMC? Politicians have no power to add double the number of legal money units, and that is what the people at The Federal Reserve System of Legal Extortion have done, and that person who answered that question knows that, had just reported that, and then when asked about impending "economic chaos", the answer dodged the actual people responsible for willfully causing the chaos, and the answer points to the hired goons in the so called "government". Do you see a problem with the supposed, authoritative, expert, professional answer? I do. The false script goes on to finger you guys, all you honest productive people in America, are fingered, can you believe it? Look: Doug and I have both written about the fact that we are living in a steadily degrading democracy at this point, with the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough. Personally, I don’t see how we get to the point where politicians, where the voters, decide that a much smaller government is a much better way to go. At least not unless and until we're forced to. Do you think this situation can drag on, or will the size of the debt and deficits force a change sooner rather than later? How many people actually vote? Are you going to believe the poll numbers published by the same people who stand to gain by fingering all of you honest productive American people as the guilty ones, the ones who are causing the march toward "economic chaos"? How many people actually vote? I ran for congress, in my 40th district California, and I'll get those figures published by that State office: http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/1996/96Stat.htm 40. Jerry Lewis, Republican----------- 98,821 Robert `Bob' Conaway, Democrat 44,102 Joseph T. Kelley, Libertarian------- 4,375 142,298 Total votes http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd?state=CA&district=41 Note: The District numbers have been changed since 1996, 40 is now 41, and I didn't know that until now. I don't vote. I happen to know that voting is a scam, it is rigged in more ways than one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_41st_congressional_district Population (2000) 639,088 Vote count (1996) 142,298 http://www.onlineconversion.com/percentcalc.htm 22% of the Total Population according to those sources, admittedly not accurate. Supposing then, that the votes are not rigged, and supposing that only half of the population is allowed to vote, and rounding up from 44% to 50% or the legal voting public, leaves 50% who cannot, in any way, be held accountable for what those legal criminals have done, as they obey whoever pays them to cause mayhem at the National level. Back to the quote: Doug and I have both written about the fact that we are living in a steadily degrading democracy at this point, with the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough. Personally, I don’t see how we get to the point where politicians, where the voters, decide that a much smaller government is a much better way to go. At least not unless and until we're forced to. Do you think this situation can drag on, or will the size of the debt and deficits force a change sooner rather than later? Do you see that? the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough That is called collective punishment, in the form of a guilty verdict handed down from that authority upon all who constitute The Public, which is you, me, and every other breathing person, found guilty, and publicly tried, convicted, and sentenced, drug through the mud, how does it feel? You are guilty. Did you have your day in court? Were you judged by 12 randomly selected members of the same public, where any one of those jurors has the power to acquit you of all charges, based solely upon his, or her, absolute power to judge both the morality of the law, and your guilt or innocence? No, you are guilty, that is it. Shut up. You have already been punished, go cry in the corner. Who claims that these guys are in any position to solve this impending "economic chaos" problem? How much does someone get paid, with your earnings, to come up with this script, and how much does someone else get paid, again with your earnings, to parrot these fables? "Economic chaos" is the agenda, and the FOMC, or whoever pulls their strings, cause it, on purpose, and there isn't anyone in the public that has the power to do anything about it, legally, or otherwise, unless they too resort to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, and manages to get away with doing so, to accomplish the goal. Product 1 and Product 2 solves that problem, as earlier explained, and those are just illustrated examples of how to solve the problem with legal competition in money markets, competition fixes the problem, since the problem is an enforced monopoly, and it does not take an expert Gold Bug, or Austrian Economics Professor, or Politician, or Private Banker, to know the simple truth. So I think job number one is to understand what's going on, so that you’re not blindly relying on anyone's advice. So, how about explaining what is going on? The legal criminals are destroying the power to create power, because too much power empowers the victims with enough power to avoid being victims. Sure, education is a power, but so is money, and so those legal criminals have all the power over legal money, just ask one, Ron Paul does, what answer does Ron Paul get? Lies. Lead on - liars. Where does that go? Job number two, if you see the world as I see it, is to make sure that a substantial share of your wealth is in precious metals and perhaps in foreign currencies, but without any leverage. How many of the non-voting, honest, productive, American people are now unable to keep any of their surplus wealth, have no savings, have only mortgage debts, at interest, credit card debts, at interest, business loan debts, at interest, student loans, at interest, and more work hours, and less to show for it, and more work hours still, and even less to show for it, and higher taxes, and higher prices, and more injuries, and fewer customers, and less competition forcing higher quality and lower cost, especially in legal money markets, how many of those people, are in any position to buy precious metals, at today's prices, or foreign currencies that can't be use to pay debt in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)? Few. Those Gold Bugs are an elite group, who still, even now, have vast sums of savings, interest earning savings, even savings earned by interest payments, and is it any wonder that their claims of "artificial interest rates" means the same thing as: "My interest earning investments are not paying as much as I prefer."? Do you have a clue? It may be well past time to get one. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, There is a need to know. What? That is an example of what can be called a circular argument, or we can invent another name, or find another name already invented, whereby the human mind follows a path that appears to return back to the start. There is a need to know. That is undeniable. A human being, for example, must know all that is required in the work of reproduction, not just female knowledge, certainly not when they are too burdened with pregnancy to produce enough power to keep both mother and child alive for however long it takes to raise a child into a productive human being. That is a need to know example, a must have, failing to have that knowledge results in the extinction of the human species. Human beings are not gifted with an overpowering instinct, or auto-pilot. We actually need to know. What do we need to know? We need to know, for another example, that we need to know things. Failing to know that we need to know things, has a human word attached to that failure, and it is either called ignorance or stupidity. Ignorance can still involve the certain knowledge that there is a need to know. Stupidity can be an example of a living person who is ignorant of two things: 1. Needing to know something. 2. Knowing the need to know something. What about someone who is even more intellectually crippled? 1, Needing to know something, but failing. 2. Not knowing the need to know something, not even trying to know. 3. Believing in the right, or good, of not knowing something and refusing to know it; while knowing that there is a vital need to know, being duplicitous, and convinced that duplicity is the right thing to do, the good path to be on, the road to something better. A path that appears to return to the starting point, often, is a path that is traveled down a duplicitous path less often, it seems to me. A path that never returns back to the starting point, it seems to me, is called a paradox. But these are just words. Here is a source: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-zeno/ You think that there are many things? Then you must conclude that everything is both infinitely small and infinitely big! You think that motion is infinitely divisible? Then it follows that nothing moves! (This is what a ‘paradox’ is: a demonstration that a contradiction or absurd consequence follows from apparently reasonable assumptions.) Beware of Greeks bearing gifts. A victim of an ongoing fraud remains one for as long as the criminal fraud is able to overpower the victim, by some measure. Here is a measure: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Now, you may say, Joe, really, why so many times? Why do you, so often, link that official U.S. Debt Clock? I'm feeling as if you want us to be depressed, drained, our life's blood sucked out of us, so that we are rendered powerless, and unable to do anything about our failing spirit? No, that is wrong, if you think that, the opposite is true, which is a recurring realization once you get on the right road, you will often be reminded that, NO, THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE. The Debt Clock intends to drain you, it does drain you, and I'm pointing out something that intends to empower you, to suggest to you, that, perhaps, you need to know something. A. You need to know that you need to know something. B. You need to know that much of what you have grown up "knowing" is OPPOSITE of the truth. C. The Debt Clock measures HOW MUCH POWER YOU CAN HAVE STOLEN FROM YOU AND YOU STILL HAVE ENOUGH POWER TO THRIVE. You have been taught that the U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) National Debt is bad, and it isn't bad, the opposite is true, it allows you to know who, exactly, is stealing all your power, and therefore, all you have to do is cut off that specific flow of power, and all that power returns back to the source, or more accurately speaking, it never leaves the source. Now you know. Now what do you need to know? 1. How to stop that flow of power from the honest productive American people to the lying, torturing, and mass murdering serial killers who spend it, save it, invest it, bribe with it, subsidize with it, and use it to keep the power flowing in that direction faster, and faster, and faster, starving out the source, lowering the standard of living, for all but a few, increasing the cost of living, for all but a few, and generally using that power to commit legal crimes - such as wars of aggression for profit - now numbering 6 in progress. 2. How to increase the standard of living and lower the cost of living so as to have the power to increase the standard of living and lower the cost of living? By the way, on this road that appears, often, to return back to the start, the runaway hired strong man, Hitler, over-extended legal crime military might onto 5 fronts; while the legal criminals employing U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) are now on 6 known fronts. What do you think is the real plan with that repeat of that "error"? U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) is hired to go down a self-destructive path, and you can know this, as well as anyone, for it is true, the employees hired to go down this path obey unconditionally. This is the path, go down this path, and there is no other option, according to the people who sign the pay check. That sentence follows back to the source of that paper trail, denominated in dollars, and the people running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion have the power to write those checks, any check denominated in dollars begins at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion. They can create twice the number of dollars, as they did in 2008, and they can remove half at will, and you don't have that power. As it turns out, and you should not be surprised: the way to stop the flow of power flowing from the honest productive American people to the legal criminals is also the same method by which the honest productive American people ensure an steady increase in the standard of living, for all, and the steady reduction in the cost of living, for all, and if it is a surprise to you, you may be on that duplicitous path, obeying unconditionally, believing in the lies you are victim too, since birth, or even before then. How, use your own brain, how is a social network measured relative to another as being obviously a network of higher standard of living and obviously lower in cost of living? This is easy. People in the higher standard of living network are happy, all of them, with few exceptions, and there are many ways in which an unhappy person can find happiness, so long as each person avoids resorting to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, since doing so makes the victims of deceit, threats of violence, and victims of violence, unhappy, with few exceptions. When the people who are made happy, when they are making victims unhappy, when those sociopaths, those mutants, those few exceptions in the genetic code, are the employers, writing the checks, what do you think happens? 1. Lower standards of living for all but a few. 2. Higher costs of living for all but a few. You may find, at this point, a path in front of you, and in order for you to take this path you have to either work very hard or you are finding this path easier and easier to travel, and that is a direct measure of just how powerful falsehood has you in it's grip. To bad for those who don't even know enough to get this far. Look here: http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm For those who didn't go down that path directly, having read that whole link, before doing anything else, I can cut all that down into a sound bite, but please understand that sound bites work subconsciously, and listening to sound bites are one way streets, they are examples of dictation, they are instructions, your tool of choice is bypassed, the order to be obeyed goes past your ability to filter it, and you are subject to the sound bite, you are not in command of the information, and you may want to back up on your progress down that slippery slope. But I can cut down the data some. Within that work, which isn't news, it was written first in that time period when so many new things were invented, just before the abomination has been falsely named The Civil War, within that work is an explanation that you may want to read and it is titled A Parasite City: http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm#4 How can the power made by honest productive people be made to flow to a few people who produce nothing but lies, threats of violence, and violence upon the innocent? You ask the question, if you think that you need to know, and the answer isn't difficult to know, read A Parasite City. I'll wait until you are done. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, A few, or even one, person may have read A Parasite City linked in the previous report (tabled for discussion, unanswered). Of those few, or just that one, the mention of capitalism may have thrown off someone who considers himself, or herself, a capitalist, and I think one of the need to know things has to do with labels. Beware of labels, like Greeks bearing gifts. One thing in an upside down world, a world where too many people obey unconditionally, where that world may have two labels for one thing, because one label is true, and one is a false front: for public consumption. Many speakers who are against legal crime, such as the legal crime of extortion, where a few legal criminals command the power of a legal money monopoly, may be speakers who employ the word capitalism to convey that thing that the speaker is against, or socialism, or fascism, or legal crime may be the word chosen by the speaker who is against legal crime. Which brings up another one of those shoulders of Giants: Shakespeare. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose http://www.enotes.com/shakespeare-quotes/what-s-name-that-which-we-call-rose If everyone, universally, is able to get the better end of the stick, where no one is the victim of someone's employment of deceit, no one is victim to willful threats of violence, or victim of violence, then that can still be an example of capitalism. Capitalists may refuse to acknowledge the same thing applied to socialism, with few exceptions. Therefore: roughly half of the population is set to argue with the other half over a clear misunderstanding, and it may be a good time to know that this is another need to know thing. Socialists who don't willfully support the employment of deceit, threats of violence, or acts of violence upon the innocent, so as to get the better deal, may never find anything in common with roughly half of the population, due to a confusion of terms. Capitalists who don't willfully support the employment of deceit, threats of violence, or acts of violence upon the innocent, so as to get the better deal, many never find anything in common with roughly half of the population, due to a confusion of terms. How about honest productive Americans? How about legal criminals? Now you have new terms to employ, terms that are bullet proof, incorruptible terms, terms with specific meaning, terms that are not intentionally ambiguous, terms that are not constructively interpretable. Use them when you mean to convey specific meaning, use them when you are not trying to confuse someone, to deceive someone, or to target someone, so as to get the better end of the deal. Un-divide, and become un-conquered. Liberate yourself from those who work to enslave you, and who are very effective in that work. Know how to communicate exact meaning, without any room for reasonable doubt, no room for plausible deniability. I do not fall into that clap trap of capitalism versus socialism, or republicans versus democrats, or left versus right, when I am speaking to honest productive Americans, and when I am warning honest productive Americans about their most effective enemies who are accurately identifiable, effectively accounted for, as legal criminals. Legal criminals may call themselves socialists when they want capitalists on their side, and legal criminals may call themselves capitalists when they want socialists on their side, one second, and the next second legal criminals may turn the switch, put on a different hat, print up different stationary, change the font, change the name on the door, change underwear, flip, flop, or say whatever works best to keep the power flowing, faster, and faster, in the direction that causes a short end of the stick, held by honest productive Americans. This is very simple. Equity is an exchange whereby there is no short end of the stick. Generosity is measurable as one person giving up more to someone else, willfully, and one person receiving something for nothing, willfully, and therefore a measure of equity, no short end. What does that leave? Someone employing deceit, threats of violence, or acts of violence, upon the innocent, so as to invent, create, and then enforce a short end of the stick, which is an inequitable exchange, by some measure, and does it make any sense to believe the measure offered by the legal criminal when asked if the exchange was fair, equitable, right, good, mutually agreeably, willfully done, and legal, when a true answer will be a confession of guilt? Back, please, to the measure of surplus wealth, and the measure that is accurately knowable as a universal increase in the standard of living while a universal reduction in the cost of living is realized in fact. This isn't ambiguous, it may be difficult to measure exactly as a universal measure, and statistics can be falsified, and trust in statistics is about as trust worthy as trust in politicians - universally. There are always exceptions. To illustrate the ease of knowing the real measure of surplus wealth, and that measure that is accurately knowable as a universal increase in the standard of living, while a universal reduction in the cost of living is realized in fact, we can turn to extreme examples in history. I choose The Soviet Union during Stalin's mass murder of 20 million honest productive people in Russia as a measure of a low extreme of surplus wealth. I choose U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) just before The Civil War as the other end of the extreme measure of surplus wealth. There are exceptions to the measure of Universal standards of living being high in either case, but the average measure is measurable as tortured people marching to piles of murdered people, where few exceptions exist: people, as a rule, with few exceptions, consider torture to be a low, not a high, measure of the standard of living, and few people, as a rule, consider mass murder to be a high, not a low, cost of living, with few exceptions. As 20 million people marched along the trail of tear to their untimely miserable death, few were whistling a happy tune, asking for more of this good thing. 20 million tortured and mass murdered cause the average to drop, even if a very few people, in that social network, are very, very, very, wealthy. So, having those two extreme examples, or you can pick your own examples, the relative measure between a worst case, and a best case, can help measure that which is to be avoided, and that which is to be worked toward gaining. Where are we now? Are we moving from better to worse? Are we moving from worse to better? What is on the road ahead if we are going from better to worse, faster, and faster, and faster? What is on the road ahead as we strive to move from where we are to something better? Can we get to something better by consuming other people, using them up, exploiting other people, inventing a short end of a stick, employing a short end of a stick on someone who will get that short end, and then we maintain that invention, we even sharpen the short end, and we even thrust it faster, deeper, harder, into the targeted victims, on our chosen road to improvement? Can we just call that "change" instead of improvement, and then get away with that plan? Now that you have a best case and worst case idea, in your mind, you now have a scale, and you now have a relative measure of where we are, and you now have a way to perceive "change". Which way are we going? How is it measured? How about surplus wealth? We are here now. We have X. X is the total measure of surplus wealth, and we can avoid, for now, who has it, we can, for now, just know that it is X, and more X is better, and even more X is even better, and rapidly decreasing X is not better - universally speaking. Some may profit even while X is plunging into never before known levels of scarcity, abject misery, torture, and mass murder. X for us in American now is more than the 20 million murdered in Stalin's Gulag Archipelago had, and X is less than the total of whatever total works to illustrate more, I chose the measure of X before the not so Civil War in America, you can pick something that works for you. How is X increased? How is the standard of living increased universally? How is the cost of living increased universally - with few exceptions? If X is increased, there is more power, more surplus wealth exists, few may get more of more, many may get less of more, admittedly, but, with few exceptions, more means more, and less means less, when there is more, there is more, and when there is much, much, much more, compared to much, much, much, less, most have more, compared to most having less. How is X increased, so as to universally raise the standard of living, and at the same time: universally reduce the cost of living? This is not too tough. Honest productive people keep their power, and they do what they do best, they produce more, and that is how that works. What does not work? Honest productive people transfer their earnings to legal criminals, and then the legal criminals grow more, and more, and more powerful, and the legal criminals use the stolen power to keep the power flowing faster, and faster, and faster, to them, from the source of power, which is, without a shadow of doubt, the honest productive people. I've written all that above so as to get to the next illustration, and I'm going to take a break, edit this much, post it, and return. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/sullivan-c3.1.1.htmlQuestions for Presidential 'Debate' Participants 1 (a.)All of you who use an income tax preparer, raise your hand. I do not propose to run the country. I propose to end legal crime, and I have a specific method by which that goal can be achieved, only, if enough honest productive American's are willing to work toward that same goal, and I have very specific things that must be done to reach that goal. I do not pay taxes, to my best ability, since I know that the power I earn is stolen by legal criminals and then those thieves use that stolen power to keep power flowing in that direction, from honest productive Americans, to them, the legal criminals, and they have no moral limit whatsoever as they lie, torture, and mass murder to keep the power flowing in that specific direction. Is my answer cut down to a small enough sound bite to please you? 2. If you can not prepare your own tax returns, is it reasonable to hold the average citizen criminally liable for errors? To the best of my ability: I will use what political power I have, and I will use the economic power I have, to make taxes as voluntary as can be, and returning to a limited National government tax structure, taxing only State legal fictions, and no longer taxing sovereign individuals will be done, by me, if I have enough legal power, political power, and economic power to do so, when elected, or not. How much power will I gain when gaining the office of The President of The United States? You tell me. Who will shoot me, when I try to do these things, alone gunman? Will my family be threatened? You tell me. 3. How do you expect to understand bills sent to you for your signature if you can't fill out a tax return? The Founding Fathers who resisted adoption of The Constitution favored The Articles of Confederation because one was better than the other in their Founding Father brains. They said that The Constitution was too ambiguous, too easily misinterpreted, too libel to be constructively interpreted by evil people, they warned that The Constitution was much too much, in the way of words, to be good enough as a simple, easy to understand, law power, working for The People, on the road to Liberty. They were right, look at the volumes upon volumes of text written by criminals who have taken over your government, as those legal criminals manage to enslave you, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of horrible, terrifying violence, not limited to torture, and mass murder. You tell me why there are are too many laws, smarty pants. Criminals lie, and one lie creates a demand for two more lies, then four, then eight, is that simple enough, a small enough sound bite, to answer the question asked, directly, and without any room for misinterpretation? 4. At what point will the national debt be "too high"? That is a question that is based upon a lie. The Nation cannot be held accountable for any debt. Honest productive American people are the source of all credit, and they are the benefactors of any profits of any loans that are borrowed from them. How is that fact turned upside down whereby those same honest productive American people are then convinced of a false belief that they owe something to the borrowers? You tell me. Why do you ask a question that is based upon a fundamental error, a fundamentally based fraud, a fraud that is perpetrated upon the honest productive American people, by legal criminals? When honest productive American people demand something better, that is when that lie you speak of is "too high". I can quote Henry Ford: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." How much sound bite time to I have left, before tomorrow morning? 5. What is the case law giving the federal government power to prohibit the possession of drugs? I am not a lawyer, I am an honest productive American, if that group agrees with me on that point, if I earn that credit, that is what I am, and as to the question that may, or may not, be answered accurately, and honestly, by a qualified, licensed, lawyer, or me, as an honest productive American, or as The President of The United States of America, the accurate answer would require a lot of careful effort, much, much, too much effort for me alone, to tackle that job, of answering that question, considering the fact that people are being tortured, right now, and I am paying for it. I have more important things to do, than answer that question accurately. If I have time, I see a need to add: Alone, all by myself, without any help, from anyone, that question is not within my power to answer, accurately, but I can guess. My guess is that the people who have invented drug prohibition, on a National level, have done so fraudulently, by constructively interpreting The Constitution to suit their own interests, at the expense of everyone else's interest, as warned by The Founding Fathers who opposed The Constitution. 6. Assuming all of you are against waste, fraud and abuse; what specific programs and agencies do you propose to eliminate? My method of returning the force of government back to a force used only in defense against crime, instead of a force that enforces crime, involves specific things, such as specific legal monetary products which will stop the flow of power currently flowing to the legal criminals, and once that power stop flowing from the honest productive Americans, and once that power stops flowing to the legal criminals, on the National level, the honest productive people in America will be more powerful, and the legal criminals will be less powerful as time goes by, since the honest productive American people will invest their power wisely, and the legal criminals will consume their power carelessly, and soon, very soon afterward, there will be no more demand for those specific programs that have been invented, produced, and maintained by the legal criminals at the National level. At the State level those same boondoggles may persist, and then the honest productive American people will have the power to vote with their feet to States that are not so careless as to spend hard earned wealth on wasteful, or even destructive expenses. Do I have any time left? 7. Should any federal departments or programs ever be eliminated, if so, which ones? The very first federal department that can be eliminated by way of competition is The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, and that is my number one target, that is the one "program" that will be eliminated by my offering of two legal financial competitors, of which I have not the time to explain here and now. In any case, by any effective method, once that one "program" is no longer powerful, on the National level, all other destructive programs can then be eliminated, one by one, as the power flowing to those destructive programs will no longer be flowing to them, they will wither on the vine, for lack of the sustenance they are currently feasting on, which, again, comes from the honest productive people in America. Once the power stops flowing to those destructive programs, where will the inventors, and producers, and perpetrators, the profiteers, of those destructive programs get their power? You tell me. 8. How many military bases does the U.S. maintain in foreign countries? As an honest productive American, a member of the public, the answer to that question is not within my power to know, it is not "for public consumption", but there are guess, and there are numbers that are "for public consumption", numbers that do not include secret bases, or top secret bases, and the numbers that are "for public consumption", minus those that are not, are, as far as I know, hundreds, even thousands, and the costs paid for by honest productive Americans, for those bases, are roughly equal to the cost of the supposed "National Debt". How, then, has it happened, that the people who profit from those bases, have borrowed the money to build and maintain those bases, from the honest productive American people, and then, those borrowers then borrow more money, and then those borrowers use that money to make the honest productive American people believe that they owe the borrowers for having loaned that money to the borrowers? You tell me how that trick works. Please. And on top of that immensely careless, and incalculably costly fraud, the borrowers have even managed to convince the lenders, that the borrowers are owed interest on the power they stole from the producers of that power. The answer to the question is the same answer already offered, once the money stops flowing, those bases will close, troops will return to defensive, moral, work, and troops will no longer be consumed in the legal crimes known as aggressive wars for profit, the same crimes that Nazi perpetrators where found guilty of perpetrating, and those Nazi legal criminals were hung by the neck, or otherwise killed, for having committed those very crimes. I'm not proposing a death penalty as a solution, a final solution, I am proposing legal monetary competition as the solution, and I can explain in detail how legal monetary competition solves the problem whereby honest productive people, in America, finance legal crime. It isn't rocket science, or brain surgery, and it is simple enough for a 5 year old to know. If you send power to criminals, what do you think will happen? You can call me stupid, or call me a conspiracy theorist, but before doing so, you most certainly have to avoid looking in the mirror. Have I run out of time? 9. How many do you propose to close? That is a very serious question, and there are people who are being tortured right now, innocent people being tortured right now, in secret bases, paid for by honest America people, and if elected, that is my number on priority, while working to end the legal money monopoly, to use the power credited to me, in those two directions, simultaneously, to stop the torture, and stop the mass murder as soon as possible, and at the same time, stop the power flowing from the honest productive American people as that power is now flowing to the legal criminals who have ordered, and continue to order, those tortures, and those mass murders. My plan, on that front, is to seek out honest people in each National government agency, CIA, FBI, etc., reward them for fingering known criminals, account for those known criminals, and use those agencies to compete with each other, eventually working toward raising the quality of their services, and lowering the cost of those services, in the work of defense, and to end the use of those services as they are currently employed in legal crimes. I will find those secret bases, pull the funds, pull the resources, pit each agency against the other, to weed out the criminals, and to credit the honest, defensive, agents with what they deserve, as they help turn their work from legal crime, aggressive wars (on terror, or drugs, or whatever cover story is uncovered to be a lie), from aggressive wars for profit, to defensive power only. That question will be answered in fact, if I am elected, and not shot before that answer is made real. 10. How much does it cost to keep the above-mentioned bases in operation? The total cost of surplus wealth, denominated in dollars, and not including costs borne by torture and murder victims, including the families of the tortured and mass murdered, is roughly equal to The National Debt as advertized, not including the debts that are not "for public consumption". That number is published on a web page, just search for The National Debt Clock, it is a crime in progress. A legal crime in progress. 11. If a state chooses to nullify a federal law, what action would you take? In the spirit of a Democratic Federated Republic form of government, which is not the case with The Constitution, my actions are, and will continue to be, supportive of all exercises of legal sovereignty, right down to the individual level, from the Federal Level, to the State level, to the County level, to the City level, to the Company level, to the small business level, to the family level, and to the individual level. If another State that has not nullified a federal law grows jealous, and threatens to attack a State that does nullify a federal law, then a Democratic Federated Republican form of government would support the State, defensively, that is being threatened, the same one that nullified a federal law, and the Federal government would therefore be against the belligerent State, the aggressive State, the one that grew jealous of the State that did nullify the federal law, and there is historical precedent on this point in the example of Shays's Rebellion under The Articles of Confederation, which can be explain in detail, but not in a sound bite. How much time to I have left? 12. If a state were to secede from the union. what action would you take? A Democratic Federated Republic form of government is what you would be voting for if I am elected, and in that capacity I can interpret The Constitution in that way, since The Constitution was written to be constructively interpreted, and therefore, as The President, I interpret the law of the land to be such that all the States are bound voluntarily into a voluntary Union of Separate and Sovereign legal fictions, and as such, they are free to join, and free to secede, at will. Having said that, and in reference to the previous question, the duty of the Federated legal fiction, controlled by me, as The President, I would see my duty to be such that a belligerent State, whereby the elected representatives of that state, planning on, and the following through with the plan, to conduct aggressive wars for profit, would be cause for me using my power in defense against such actions, internally, or externally, and again, there is historical precedent in Shays's Rebellion on this point, however, in that case the elected officials at the federal level were impotent; which means that they allowed the legal criminals to perpetrate aggressive wars for profit. I would allow no such thing, not within my power, not on my watch. Liberty or you are dead, not me, in my way of thinking. If the choice is given to me, Obey, without any other choice, and I have within my power to disobey, what do you think I will choose? You tell me. I am an American. You don't give me that choice. I earn that choice. How much time left? Please excuse me, I have an opportunity to earn my living, and if I don't grab this, someone else will, and so I have to get some work done now, and I can return here later. Thank you very much for the good questions, I will be looking, with great interest, in any answers offered by the competition. No time to edit. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/sullivan-c3.1.1.html QuoteQuestions for Presidential 'Debate' Participants Quote1 (a.)All of you who use an income tax preparer, raise your hand. (b.) If you (who raised hands) can not prepare your own taxes, how do you propose to run the country? I do not propose to run the country. I propose to end legal crime, and I have a specific method by which that goal can be achieved, only, if enough honest productive American's are willing to work toward that same goal, and I have very specific things that must be done to reach that goal. I do not pay taxes, to my best ability, since I know that the power I earn is stolen by legal criminals and then those thieves use that stolen power to keep power flowing in that direction, from honest productive Americans, to them, the legal criminals, and they have no moral limit whatsoever as they lie, torture, and mass murder to keep the power flowing in that specific direction. Is my answer cut down to a small enough sound bite to please you? Quote2. If you can not prepare your own tax returns, is it reasonable to hold the average citizen criminally liable for errors? To the best of my ability: I will use what political power I have, and I will use the economic power I have, to make taxes as voluntary as can be, and returning to a limited National government tax structure, taxing only State legal fictions, and no longer taxing sovereign individuals will be done, by me, if I have enough legal power, political power, and economic power to do so, when elected, or not. How much power will I gain when gaining the office of The President of The United States? You tell me. Who will shoot me, when I try to do these things, alone gunman? Will my family be threatened? You tell me. Quote3. How do you expect to understand bills sent to you for your signature if you can't fill out a tax return? The Founding Fathers who resisted adoption of The Constitution favored The Articles of Confederation because one was better than the other in their Founding Father brains. They said that The Constitution was too ambiguous, too easily misinterpreted, too libel to be constructively interpreted by evil people, they warned that The Constitution was much too much, in the way of words, to be good enough as a simple, easy to understand, law power, working for The People, on the road to Liberty. They were right, look at the volumes upon volumes of text written by criminals who have taken over your government, as those legal criminals manage to enslave you, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of horrible, terrifying violence, not limited to torture, and mass murder. You tell me why there are are too many laws, smarty pants. Criminals lie, and one lie creates a demand for two more lies, then four, then eight, is that simple enough, a small enough sound bite, to answer the question asked, directly, and without any room for misinterpretation? Quote4. At what point will the national debt be "too high"? That is a question that is based upon a lie. The Nation cannot be held accountable for any debt. Honest productive American people are the source of all credit, and they are the benefactors of any profits of any loans that are borrowed from them. How is that fact turned upside down whereby those same honest productive American people are then convinced of a false belief that they owe something to the borrowers? You tell me. Why do you ask a question that is based upon a fundamental error, a fundamentally based fraud, a fraud that is perpetrated upon the honest productive American people, by legal criminals? When honest productive American people demand something better, that is when that lie you speak of is "too high". I can quote Henry Ford: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." How much sound bite time to I have left, before tomorrow morning? Quote5. What is the case law giving the federal government power to prohibit the possession of drugs? I am not a lawyer, I am an honest productive American, if that group agrees with me on that point, if I earn that credit, that is what I am, and as to the question that may, or may not, be answered accurately, and honestly, by a qualified, licensed, lawyer, or me, as an honest productive American, or as The President of The United States of America, the accurate answer would require a lot of careful effort, much, much, too much effort for me alone, to tackle that job, of answering that question, considering the fact that people are being tortured, right now, and I am paying for it. I have more important things to do, than answer that question accurately. If I have time, I see a need to add: Alone, all by myself, without any help, from anyone, that question is not within my power to answer, accurately, but I can guess. My guess is that the people who have invented drug prohibition, on a National level, have done so fraudulently, by constructively interpreting The Constitution to suit their own interests, at the expense of everyone else's interest, as warned by The Founding Fathers who opposed The Constitution. Quote6. Assuming all of you are against waste, fraud and abuse; what specific programs and agencies do you propose to eliminate? My method of returning the force of government back to a force used only in defense against crime, instead of a force that enforces crime, involves specific things, such as specific legal monetary products which will stop the flow of power currently flowing to the legal criminals, and once that power stop flowing from the honest productive Americans, and once that power stops flowing to the legal criminals, on the National level, the honest productive people in America will be more powerful, and the legal criminals will be less powerful as time goes by, since the honest productive American people will invest their power wisely, and the legal criminals will consume their power carelessly, and soon, very soon afterward, there will be no more demand for those specific programs that have been invented, produced, and maintained by the legal criminals at the National level. At the State level those same boondoggles may persist, and then the honest productive American people will have the power to vote with their feet to States that are not so careless as to spend hard earned wealth on wasteful, or even destructive expenses. Do I have any time left? Quote7. Should any federal departments or programs ever be eliminated, if so, which ones? The very first federal department that can be eliminated by way of competition is The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, and that is my number one target, that is the one "program" that will be eliminated by my offering of two legal financial competitors, of which I have not the time to explain here and now. In any case, by any effective method, once that one "program" is no longer powerful, on the National level, all other destructive programs can then be eliminated, one by one, as the power flowing to those destructive programs will no longer be flowing to them, they will wither on the vine, for lack of the sustenance they are currently feasting on, which, again, comes from the honest productive people in America. Once the power stops flowing to those destructive programs, where will the inventors, and producers, and perpetrators, the profiteers, of those destructive programs get their power? You tell me. Quote8. How many military bases does the U.S. maintain in foreign countries? As an honest productive American, a member of the public, the answer to that question is not within my power to know, it is not "for public consumption", but there are guess, and there are numbers that are "for public consumption", numbers that do not include secret bases, or top secret bases, and the numbers that are "for public consumption", minus those that are not, are, as far as I know, hundreds, even thousands, and the costs paid for by honest productive Americans, for those bases, are roughly equal to the cost of the supposed "National Debt". How, then, has it happened, that the people who profit from those bases, have borrowed the money to build and maintain those bases, from the honest productive American people, and then, those borrowers then borrow more money, and then those borrowers use that money to make the honest productive American people believe that they owe the borrowers for having loaned that money to the borrowers? You tell me how that trick works. Please. And on top of that immensely careless, and incalculably costly fraud, the borrowers have even managed to convince the lenders, that the borrowers are owed interest on the power they stole from the producers of that power. The answer to the question is the same answer already offered, once the money stops flowing, those bases will close, troops will return to defensive, moral, work, and troops will no longer be consumed in the legal crimes known as aggressive wars for profit, the same crimes that Nazi perpetrators where found guilty of perpetrating, and those Nazi legal criminals were hung by the neck, or otherwise killed, for having committed those very crimes. I'm not proposing a death penalty as a solution, a final solution, I am proposing legal monetary competition as the solution, and I can explain in detail how legal monetary competition solves the problem whereby honest productive people, in America, finance legal crime. It isn't rocket science, or brain surgery, and it is simple enough for a 5 year old to know. If you send power to criminals, what do you think will happen? You can call me stupid, or call me a conspiracy theorist, but before doing so, you most certainly have to avoid looking in the mirror. Have I run out of time? Quote9. How many do you propose to close? That is a very serious question, and there are people who are being tortured right now, innocent people being tortured right now, in secret bases, paid for by honest America people, and if elected, that is my number on priority, while working to end the legal money monopoly, to use the power credited to me, in those two directions, simultaneously, to stop the torture, and stop the mass murder as soon as possible, and at the same time, stop the power flowing from the honest productive American people as that power is now flowing to the legal criminals who have ordered, and continue to order, those tortures, and those mass murders. My plan, on that front, is to seek out honest people in each National government agency, CIA, FBI, etc., reward them for fingering known criminals, account for those known criminals, and use those agencies to compete with each other, eventually working toward raising the quality of their services, and lowering the cost of those services, in the work of defense, and to end the use of those services as they are currently employed in legal crimes. I will find those secret bases, pull the funds, pull the resources, pit each agency against the other, to weed out the criminals, and to credit the honest, defensive, agents with what they deserve, as they help turn their work from legal crime, aggressive wars (on terror, or drugs, or whatever cover story is uncovered to be a lie), from aggressive wars for profit, to defensive power only. That question will be answered in fact, if I am elected, and not shot before that answer is made real. Quote10. How much does it cost to keep the above-mentioned bases in operation? The total cost of surplus wealth, denominated in dollars, and not including costs borne by torture and murder victims, including the families of the tortured and mass murdered, is roughly equal to The National Debt as advertized, not including the debts that are not "for public consumption". That number is published on a web page, just search for The National Debt Clock, it is a crime in progress. A legal crime in progress. Quote11. If a state chooses to nullify a federal law, what action would you take? In the spirit of a Democratic Federated Republic form of government, which is not the case with The Constitution, my actions are, and will continue to be, supportive of all exercises of legal sovereignty, right down to the individual level, from the Federal Level, to the State level, to the County level, to the City level, to the Company level, to the small business level, to the family level, and to the individual level. If another State that has not nullified a federal law grows jealous, and threatens to attack a State that does nullify a federal law, then a Democratic Federated Republican form of government would support the State, defensively, that is being threatened, the same one that nullified a federal law, and the Federal government would therefore be against the belligerent State, the aggressive State, the one that grew jealous of the State that did nullify the federal law, and there is historical precedent on this point in the example of Shays's Rebellion under The Articles of Confederation, which can be explain in detail, but not in a sound bite. How much time to I have left? Quote12. If a state were to secede from the union. what action would you take? A Democratic Federated Republic form of government is what you would be voting for if I am elected, and in that capacity I can interpret The Constitution in that way, since The Constitution was written to be constructively interpreted, and therefore, as The President, I interpret the law of the land to be such that all the States are bound voluntarily into a voluntary Union of Separate and Sovereign legal fictions, and as such, they are free to join, and free to secede, at will. Having said that, and in reference to the previous question, the duty of the Federated legal fiction, controlled by me, as The President, I would see my duty to be such that a belligerent State, whereby the elected representatives of that state, planning on, and the following through with the plan, to conduct aggressive wars for profit, would be cause for me using my power in defense against such actions, internally, or externally, and again, there is historical precedent in Shays's Rebellion on this point, however, in that case the elected officials at the federal level were impotent; which means that they allowed the legal criminals to perpetrate aggressive wars for profit. I would allow no such thing, not within my power, not on my watch. Liberty or you are dead, not me, in my way of thinking. If the choice is given to me, Obey, without any other choice, and I have within my power to disobey, what do you think I will choose? You tell me. I am an American. You don't give me that choice. I earn that choice. How much time left? Please excuse me, I have an opportunity to earn my living, and if I don't grab this, someone else will, and so I have to get some work done now, and I can return here later. Thank you very much for the good questions, I will be looking, with great interest, in any answers offered by the competition. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/sullivan-c3.1.1.html Quote13. Do you support repeal of laws compelling acceptance of government-issued money [legal tender laws]? That question concerns the nature of government. Is government a voluntary association, or is government an involuntary association. I can think of no better way to reverse the trend toward involuntary association, what I call crime, and move toward liberty, which is definable as a voluntary association, than by way of nullifying anyone claiming to have a license to enforce one specific monetary product, which is my way of answering your question affirmatively. I don't know how you propose to repeal laws that compel acceptance of government-issued money, but I do know how I plan to do so, by issuing competitive monetary products, of much higher quality, and much lower cost compared to the current legal crime products issued by The Federal Reserve System of Extortion conspirators. Quote14. Has the US ever fought an enemy who was honorable? Which ones? That is a loaded question that is derived from a false pretense. The US cannot fight, people fight, and therefore your question must be rephrased so as to actually convey meaning, instead of conveying nonsense. I can rephrase your question so as to have the question makes sense: Has any representative of the people of America ever fought an enemy who was honorable? The answer is demonstrably yes. Beginning with the leaders of The Whiskey Rebellion, whereupon those insurgents, those rebels, those Revolutionary War Veterans, honorably upheld the Spirit of 1776, as they fought against the tyrannical usurper of Liberty, the person named George Washington, as that former Friend of Liberty turned his coat, from blue to red, and crushed, in his own words, "so fatal a spirit". Those enemies of that tyrannical State exemplifies the answer to the question asked, as far as I can interpret such a loaded question, a question that is based upon a false pretense. Too many words? Not enough? You tell me. Quote15. Were the attacks on the Marine barracks in Beirut, or the USS Cole, terrorist attacks or attacks on a legitimate military target? As far as my understanding of those acts of violence: the guilty people remain unaccounted for as being people who are guilty of crimes that are committed under the color of law, what I call Legal Crime, and as you may know: all crimes resulting from the original act of criminal aggression, whereby an aggressor commits criminal aggression upon innocent people, such as an aggressive war for profit, such as the crimes that were committed by the Nazi legal criminals, the same crimes that those criminals were tried for, and killed for perpetrating, once they were found guilty, all subsequent crimes are accountable to the first crime, and therefore deaths resulting from those original criminal acts are attributable to the original perpetrators. That is not to say that anyone else is not also guilty of criminal aggression, each case must be judged on its own merit. Why not, while you are at it, question the legitimacy of the incident involving the U.S. Navy ship Liberty, as it was willfully attacked by criminals running the Israeli military, a case if ever there was one, whereby the worst criminals are uncovered during the discovery process, as dishonorable enemies sneak attack honorable military soldiers, and then our own hired employees running our own government help our dishonorable enemies cover up those specific crimes, in that specific case? How do you accurately identify friends of Liberty from our foes? Whose side are you on, I'd like to know the truth, too. Time left? Quote16. What is the maximum amount – not percentage – that anyone should have to pay in taxes? A tricky question? No one, ever, should pay in involuntary tax, doing so transfers power from a victim to a criminal, by definition of those precise words, any Tom Foolery with words, euphemisms, and politically correct verbiage, serves the criminals, helping them cover up their perpetuating crimes. You are asking that question to no fool here, Mr.: Americans are inventive, adaptive, disobedient people. Give them no option and they will invent one, we will find a way around these dictates, these orders, these involuntary associations, these taxes handed down from dictators, oppressors, tyrants, and legal criminals. No tax ordered, or else, can be paid by friends of Liberty, doing so lends psychological support, and material support to our enemies. Is that the answer you are looking for, or is that the answer that must be censored? You tell me. How much time is left? 17. Do you support abolition of the income tax? Who needs a piece of paper to do the right thing? Who needs permission? I can ask the honest productive people of America to please consider the rightness of refusing to pay "protection money" to legal criminals, please, please, please, return to some semblance of common sense, do not feed the legal criminals among us, they grow more powerful, and you, honest productive Americans, grow weaker, penny by blood soaked penny. Who has grown so stupid as to be led to believe that a piece of paper authorizes anyone, ever, to willfully injure any innocent person? Where is your common sense. Where is your head, get your head out of that place where the sun does not shine, sooner, before it is too late. Please. How much time is left? Is that condensed into a small enough sound bite for your pleasure? Quote18. Why is discrimination prohibited, but is the basis for a progressive tax? Why do people hire known liars to run their government? Find those people, account for them, let them know they are accessories to whatever crimes the people they hire commit, and perhaps there will be specific discrimination permitted, rather than prohibited, whereby criminals are no longer rewarded for abusing the power of government, and to get to that point sooner, it may be a very good idea to stop sending your hard earned surplus wealth to those very criminals, the ones with badges, the ones committing crimes under the color of law. Is it time? Is it past time? 19. Is simulated drowning, or, "waterboarding" torture? If not, define the word torture. Who has determined that torturers get to define what is not torture, while they torture? Is it more likely that the victims will honestly account for the full measure of what is, or is not torture? What ever happened to common sense? Of course the people using the power of law to torture, and to commit mass murder, conducting wars of aggression for their exclusive profit, at the expense of all the victims, will not say that they are torturing, and mass murdering, who would pay them once that cat was out of that bag? You? Confess please, will you keep sending them your hard earned power once you discover the truth? You tell me. I'm not holding my breath. I can't wait. I'm running for President of The United States, even during this phase in American History when lies are demanded, and torture is rewarded, and mass murder is the rule, not the exception in what was once our government. 20. Do you support transferring federal lands to the states in which they are located? My understanding of moral law applied to a Democratic Federated Republican form of government is such that the Republic owns no land, all land is own by The People, and if The People in one State allows their elected representatives to "own" the land, that is what they do, in that State, whose name is on the piece of paper that claims ownership of which land? Each case must be judged according to the specifics of each case. Which case are you referring to, and whose name is on the title in that case, and who is contesting title, and can the decision making process involve a working Trial by Jury if necessary? Do you understand how Trial by Jury works, when it works? I do. Each individual, each sovereign individual has as much, or more, power than elected officials, since each potential Juror has the power to nullify any law. If someone claims that their land has been stolen, there is then a defendant charged with theft. Who decides guilt or innocence in any case whatsoever? You tell me. I know how Liberty can work. What we have working now, for the most part, is legal crime, so long as liars, torturers, and mass murderers are rewarded by their victims, so long will this persist. Common Sense please. Quote21. Hawaii has a large secessionist movement. Do you support Hawaii's right to self-determination? A working Democratic Federated Republic is a voluntary agreement. Would it be a good idea, or a bad idea, to find out why the people in Hawaii are moving toward disagreement? Do they no longer agree that it is a good idea to conduct aggressive wars for profit, or just while the profits are going to so few people? I'd ask. Someone might actually tell the truth. That is a sound bite. 22. Do you support and would you continue the War On Drugs? No. I support a war on liars who fabricate falsehood. Find them and punish them: stop rewarding them. They may then do good things, who knows? It is a fabrication of lies to advertize a war on drugs, there is no such thing possible. Drugs have absolutely no capacity to fight, so who is targeted during this war on drugs? What is next: a war on tooth fairies? How much power can transfer from the honest productive American people to the legal criminals if those legal criminals begin conducting their war on tooth fairies? Follow the money to the source, then see if there is any more power left to fight tooth fairies. Why do the legal criminals get rewarded more for telling more outrageous lies? The war on drugs is a war for drugs, as the exemplary case in Afghanistan. Who is paying what to whom in the opium trade from Afghanistan, follow that money trail, like the case precedent: Iran Contra. Wake up America, it is almost too late. Out of time? 23.(a.) Can you explain the difference between a war, conflict, police action, and kinetic military action? (b.) Are there other types of military actions other than these? I can describe each case based upon each case. If a person willfully plans to injure innocent people, they define crime by doing so, even if they call what they are doing by some other name such as spreading democracy. Organized warfare, at the national level, is not a random occurrence, if it is defensive, obviously there must be an aggressor, if there is an aggressor, who planned the aggression? Find that person, or that group, and what do you have at that point? Do you then have a mass murderer, a serial killer? How can you claim otherwise? I don't claim otherwise. A person guilty of willfully injuring one innocent person is guilty of that crime. A person guilty of willfully injuring millions of innocent people is measurably that much more destructive, that much more criminal, why spend a penny defending against the nickle and dime criminals, housing them, feeding them, rewarding them, when criminals who torture and murder millions of innocent people make you pay them every cent you make or else. Or else, you have to invent an alternative. Medium sound bite? 24. Do you support government control of schooling? What do you mean when you banter around that term? A national level government, one that is based upon the Democratic Federated Republican notion, a notion of competitiveness, is a government that has no business whatsoever in education. A national level President, within a Democratic Federated Republican form of government, just like anyone else, has an opinion, what does that matter? Legal Fiction operators, at the State level, can offer whatever they want in the way of education, it seems to me, and if one State offers much better education, at a lower price, compared to the next State, I most certainly will support anyone choosing to vote with their feet to the better place. That is how a Democratic Federated Republican form of government is supposed to work. If one State enforces a "Love it, and you can't leave it" rule. What does that constitute? In my opinion that would constitute a crime upon whoever was forced to love their "education". I can't see such a thing happening, but if it did happen, on my watch, and if I had the power, I'd, at least, help those who are forced to love their chains, to invent a better option. I'd ask. If the answer was, help me leave, I'd ask one of the other employees in one of the other States, if they could help provide sanctuary. That may appear to dodge the question of education, but again: education is not a Federal issue. False propaganda, behavioral modification, response conditioning, and forced indoctrination is on every tyrants to do list, so please use accurate labels if you want accurate answers. Next? Quote25. In your opinion, who was the worst president, and why? The answer is personal, specific to me. I was witness to the massacre in Waco Texas. I saw it on Television while it was perpetrated. I tried to join an armed march on Washington, something that was started by Linda Thomson. I still have the original VCR tapes taken inside the church where those little children were still breathing. So, for me, the worst was that, expletive, Clinton, the same perpetrator behind the genocidal economic aggressive war for profit against Iraq, the so called sanctions. That happened on my watch, it is abhorrent in the extreme. It is evil, horrible, terrifying, and to be avoided, those crimes are soon to be aimed at home, please don't allow it. Stop feeding the legal criminals, before it is too late. Please. Quote26. In your opinion, who was the best president, and why? None. I can answer the question if the question was phrased as: Who was the least evil president, and why? The least evil president, as far as I know, and my knowledge is admittedly severely limited, is William Henry Harrison, those who govern least govern best. To any of my critics on this point, save your hero worship for someone more gullible. I'm not buying into that lie. You had better wise up, and guard your liberty before it is too late. 27. In your opinion, what was the worst decision by the Supreme Court? I have no answer on that question. I can say that a Democratic Federated Republic has no need of a supreme court, in my opinion, what can a Supreme Court do that each Separate and Sovereign State cannot do within the power of nullification, or even more importantly, what can a Supreme Court do that each separate and sovereign individual juror can't do on any question of law whatsoever since each juror in a working Trial by Jury system also hold the power of nullification in each and every case? 28. Do you support government control of the internet? Which government? You banter that word around as if all governments were created equal, one indistinguishable from the other, which is demonstrably not true. Governments are competitive, some are much better than others, some are much more costly than others, and in the case of a Democratic Federated Republic the Federal level of control would be no different than your own control, or my own control, I can turn it on, and I can turn it off at will, at my personal connection. If a State turns access to the internet off to all the people in that state, my suggestion is the same one, vote with your feet, make the experiment work the way it is intended to work. Quote29. Do you support turning airline security over to the airlines? Who took security out of the hands of the people? It was not me. Do you understand the meaning of Liberty? You decide to travel by way of airplane, who is responsible for your security? Not me. As President my duty is to stop legal crime, that is what I will do, and it is false, it is fraud, it is crime, for one person to assume, involuntarily, control over security of another person. If anyone is operating a Federal protection racket, it would then me my duty to stop that ongoing crime. I would have the power to pull that plug, or I wouldn't be much of a President. Dare to find out? Go ahead, waste your vote on me, instead of wasting it on your version of security. Make my day, punk. How is that for a sound bite? Quote30. How can anyone be said to be free when the government has a prior claim on all he earns?\ Again with the universal use of the term government, as if there was only one. There are more than one. One is better than the other. One that is more along the lines of a voluntary association is much better than a criminal one. If the only one is a criminal one, and no one invents an alternative, obey. Obey. You do that, go ahead, do that, see what you get. I'm not on that boat. You have been warned. Get off that boat. Stop feeding the legal criminals, they are eating you while they terrorize you, torture you, and destroy all that makes you unique, and valuable, and honest, and good, and moral, and lovable, and productive, and sane, and worth reproducing with even better versions of you. 31. Is it possible to maintain good government when politicians lie regularly? You get what you pay for, and that isn't news. Two sentence sound bite, I'm getting good. Quote32. Will you pledge to resign from office if it can be shown that you lied to the people? If you hire a liar, on purpose, what good is a pledge? Waste your vote on an honest person, see what happens. Quote33. If you are elected, will you pledge to release all secret information regarding government crimes or unexecuted planned crimes against citizens, such as MK ULTRA, Tuskegee Experiments, Operation Northwoods, Guatemalan Syphilis Experiments, CDC Measles Experiment, etc.? I'm not in the business of pledges, promises, oaths, etc., never was, and it's getting late for me to start, but my intention is to declare war on the liars who produce falsehood in abundance, and how can that war be waged? I plan on running a reality Television show during my Presidency. You, and everyone else, are invited in on everything, except bathroom visits, and I won't be televising sex with my wife, but when I go get the legal criminals, please tune in. It will be messy. I think I may actually kick ass, literally, and if my target cries and brings me to court, I'll let the jury decide my punishment for kicking ass, and taking names. You find out. You waste your vote on an average Joe. You do the impossible. Do it. Make my, expletive, day. I won't be self censoring. Tune in, and be warned, strong language, and there may be violence, but no sex, please, that is private. Quote34. When a person's moral beliefs are in conflict with a legislative edict, what should he do? When in doubt, power out. That is an old motocross term, I'm borrowing from my brother Jack. Morality is the power behind human survival, it is the genetic code, perhaps, that drives such things as reproduction, production, a desire for facts, an abhorrence for seemingly senseless destruction. What drives the opposite, what power is in play when legislative edict goes against moral consciousness? Morality is not merely belief, to me, so I have to ask, why do you downgrade an obvious life sustaining imperative from what it is to a "belief", as if a person having moral consciousness can simply choose to turn it off? 35. Do you favor compelling citizens to violate their conscience? Why not ask if I favor involuntary associations, or blind obedience? What would be the point behind favoring citizens to violate their conscience? Responsibility is individual, or there is no such thing as responsibility. If I compel someone else to do anything against their will, by way of fraud, or by way of threats of violence, or by way of a violent act upon someone, their act is then my act, I am then responsible for my act, which in term causes their act, and to what end would I choose to confuse accountability in that way? This is not a new question. Raising children exposes this very question to the parents. How can any being in command of the power of will learn the difference between right and wrong if the power to decide is removed? If the power to decide is removed, and that power is commanded externally, instead of internally, when will the actor ever know when their decision is right or wrong, wile that power has been removed? With children there are times when the decision is too risky for the child, and the parent has to take control, and pull the child away from the imminent danger, failing to do so, allowing that wrong decision to be made, ends the life of the child, short of that, how can a child learn to use his, or her, individual power of will, without using it? An honest productive person, or a non-criminal, is an autonomous, sovereign being, not a child, and who claims to be in any position to know better, as to what is right or wrong, for anyone else? Not me. If, on the other hand, a person decides to injure an innocent person, and is well along during the commission of said crime, then who, if not me, or you, will decide to help the targeted victim avoid the impending, or even the ongoing, injury, if it is within our power to do so, at least? So, the answer to the question must be done in such a way as to accurately differentiate, discriminate, and judge, the difference between any act that involves a willful plan, and a willful act, targeting an innocent person, and anything else, and anything else, is none of my damn business, as President, or as average Joe. That is well over a sound bite, I'd have to speak quickly, or be cut off. Quote36. How does compelling someone to violate his conscience differ when we do it, from when the Communists, Nazis or Fascists did it? I don't do it. Please leave me out of that set of people who do it. I'm not in that club. I don't belong in "we" as you have volunteered me into, against my will. Please don't do that again. If you catch me doing that, let me know, I'll be more than happy to admit my error, and I can then work to avoid repeating that error. You may also, please, consider defining what you mean by "conscience", as in moral conscience, since a criminal conscience may be an entirely opposite concept, whereby the criminal mind has decided, consciously, that everyone else is asking to be injured, and it is the duty of that person, according to such as "conscience" to go ahead and provide that fabricated "service", even while the targeted victims are pleading for mercy. Who has the power to alert the victims in time to help them avoid such exercises of "conscience" so defined? The war on falsehood will be digging deep. Quote37. If the federal debt ceiling can be raised, what is it for? A few people, if that is the right term, have convinced a great majority of honest productive Americans that the act of borrowing, by those few, amounts to debt owed, with interest, to be paid by the honest productive people, and paid to those few things, that may or may not be people. Those things have a gift, probably not a God given gift either, and that gift is illustrated by this amazing power, this power that causes all those honest productive people to actually believe that they owe those few for those few having borrowed from all those honest productive people. That is a very powerful gift. The victims of that lie, amazingly enough, actually send their offspring to work for those few legal criminals, to torture, and to mass murder, and to be torture, and to be mass murdered, and some of the victims actually beg for more punishment. Can you explain to me how that happens, and stop speaking in the terms used by the legal criminals, as if their terms are acceptable? Their terms are not acceptable, they are false, they are destructive, misleading, wrong, evil, torturous, and murderous, massively murderous. Please stop using their terms. Please stop using their currency. Please. Quote38. Does the Constitution give the President exclusive power over foreign policy? (No) How can I trust you now. You cheat. You are giving me the answer you want to hear. How about the truth instead? The Constitution enables the interpreter of it to do as he, or she pleases, and that is the main reason why the Founding Fathers objected to The Constitution. You may want to learn the lessons provided to you by the people who warned you about that "feature", that constructive interpretation capacity written into that enabling document, such as Patrick Henry. You were warned, and you still don't listen. Quote39. Do you consider people such as Daniel Ellsberg, Bradley Manning and Mark Felt, heroes or traitors? There are very few hero's on my list. One is my wife. It is a short list. Whistle blowers are doing a great service to anyone who demands advance warning, Patrick Henry blew the whistle on the criminals and their usurpation, did you listen to Patrick Henry? The legal criminals cannot allow accurate data to flow to their ready victims, even if most of them love their chains, now, the legal criminals will lose their power once their victims regain their power of numbers, and they know it. The legal criminals censor, that is what they do, and they censor the most damaging information first, they are not stupid. I can borrow from one of the Whistle Blowers, and professional, as he said: "If it's been officially denied, then it’s probably true" - John Pilger. If the whistle blower is being tortured, it's probably really true. Quote40. If elected, would you pledge to return to the practice of reporting to congress the state of the union by letter instead of speech? I don't pledge, what good is a pledge. I'm not in possession of perfect knowledge. I can plan on doing things, and I can adapt along the way, invent ways to meet any obstacle along the path. My plan is to report live, keep the video feed on all the time, with few exceptions, if someone want's to know something, tune in. Do you have a better plan. If it is better, you may get my vote, but I already don't trust you, you cheat, and you have an obvious misunderstanding concerning the true purpose and design of The Constitution, which is inexcusable, since the perpetrators confessed their intentions, and there were plenty of people, like Patrick Henry, blowing the whistle. Quote41. On your second day in office, what agencies and programs do you intend to propose for elimination? My plan will take care of things my way. I'll do it my way. If you want to know the details, I can explain the details, in detail, and it won't be a sound bite. If you want to waste your vote on an honest person, then just watch and see how it is done. When the honest productive people no longer send their money to the legal criminals, with my Product 1 and Product 2 competitive legal financial instruments, offered, not enforced, just offered, not in any way an involuntary dictate, merely an offering, to anyone who wants a competitive legal money, and I may have to do some hard selling, but it will work, and when it works, the flow of power stops flowing from the honest productive people to the legal criminals, and then when that is well underway, much of those destructive "programs" will wither on the vine. Meanwhile, as stated earlier, my plan is to use each enforcement agency against the other, for the people, to have each hired employee blow the whistle on each other hired employee, taking names, and discovering, and trying, and then sentencing those who have abused defensive government and those who have employed government as a means of perpetrating crimes, such as torture, and mass murder. Those who are less guilty may have a very serious case of moral conscience enter their consciousness as the expletive hits the fan. Just watch, it will be live, a new reality show. Do you dare waste your vote so carefully? Quote42. What would you do if China, Iran, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Libya or other countries turned isolationist? Soft ball questions that are couched in the verbiage of legal crime? Why play such games? The legal criminals are busy building World War III, they are setting things up to cause China, Russia, Venezuela, and Iran on one side, and The Dollar Hegemony on the other side, the more destructive that the war can be fueled into being the better for the legal criminals who sit back and watch, safely in their bunkers, and when all that power is spent and the ashes have fallen, and while the bodies are rotting, they plan on ushering in a new world reserve currency that will most likely be produced, and maintained from Asia, no longer being produced and maintained from America, and if we allow that, we may not deserve that, but that is what we get, we the honest productive Americans, if any of us are left standing. If, as your soft ball, and irrelevant question, does happen, I can certainly be wrong, then as President I will help, with my Product 1, and Product 2, offering, help, help, help, the honest American people by helping them, by helping them keep their own earnings, so they can then use their own power to do what they do best, and then they will, we will, be in a powerful position to out produce any other group of people, and if any other group of people decide not to trade with us, then, it will be their loss, not ours. Quote43. Should the US work to reduce its stockpile of weapons of mass destruction? If not, what countries should possess such weapons? You are speaking of specific things that exemplify legal crime. Criminals devise, invent, produce, and employ weapons of mass destruction. How can anyone be so far out of touch with reality to be led to believe otherwise? If we are defensive, and we are invaded, does it make any sense in the universe, to employ a weapon that kills everyone? What have you been lead to believe, and what gives you the authority to question me, as you parrot such absurd nonsense? Anyone having anything to do with the invention, production, and use of weapons of mass destruction, as far as I am concerned, are guilty of the worst possible crimes against humanity, as such willful employment of human power actually threatens human extinction, what worse crime can be imagined by anyone, please raise your hand? To me, not to Joe McCarthy, not a witch hunt, not a punishment routine, anyone caught in that act, at least, at the very least, should have their license revoked, their pay stopped, and then, at least, set them out to make an honest living, please. Stop financing the end of human life, is there a more important warning offered by anyone? I'm not the only one on this boat. Some of us have not yet lost our sanity. Quote45. Explain the difference between law and legislation. Law is an ongoing, adaptive, continuously improving, and a competitive, agreement between honest productive people, whereby honest productive people agree to avoid resort to the use of deceit, and honest productive people agree to avoid resorting to the use of threats of violence, and honest productive people agree to avoid the use of acts of violence, against the innocent, for profit, and if you can find, anywhere, a more concise, less ambiguous, higher quality, and lower cost definition of law, please do. Legislation is elaboration, a far as I am concerned, and so long as Trial by Jury works, as designed by agreement among honest productive people, no legislation has any power, so long as any one individual juror disagrees with any specific elaboration of law, or legislation. Quote46. Should people be free to ingest substances without the approval of government? If not, why is government approval needed and how does it change the act? People do ingest substances without approval. What does it matter to you, as to what I think they should, or should not do, and are you again using the term government as if there is only one, and as if there are not two, or three, or four, and many governments, where some are much better, and less costly, and some are much worse, and much more costly? Your question is again couched in the verbiage of legal crime, and if I can translate the question into a question that coveys meaning I offer: Will you plan on, and then execute the plan, to injure innocent people who decide to ingest substances, or, will I punish people I catch ingesting substances. The answer to the meaningful question is no, and none of my business, as a sovereign person, and none of my business as The President of a working Democratic Federated Republican experimental form of government. Suppose, however, that I do catch the Vice, and I do mean Vice, President taking a hit on the bong before a meeting? I'll look into the camera and say: "Now that is a vice president." If the dude, or woman, can't handle the job, for any reason, it may be a good time to find a more competitive employee, what do you think? Quote47. How small does a business have to be before it can't expect a government bailout in bad economic times? That is covered very well in my Product 1, and Product 2, offering. Any person earns credit, as far as I am concerned, and therefore any person can borrow from their own good faith and credit, and who is to claim otherwise? Who is made to pay for the mistakes made by anyone, ever, and how does that process occur in any level, in a family, in a small business, a large business, a town, a city, a county, a State, a Nation, or a Federation, or a world? When power flows to those who use power to produce more power best, what do you think happens? When power flows to those who destroy things "best" what do you think happens. I don't chain myself down within the boundaries of the legal crime industry, I don't censor my thinking that does not conform to fashionable thought, I do not restrict my life down to a narrow line that has be dictated by fashion, or legislation, and therefore I can see things clearly, not muddled, not distorted, not confused, not filtered, and not according to your dogma. When power is allowed to flow, voluntarily, from those who create power, it tends to flow to those who use power best, to increase the quality of life, and to lower the cost of life, and my job will be to remove those criminal connections that hinder that natural flow of power. I can do that with my Product 1, and Product 2 plan. You cannot. You fail to see what I see, and you sound to me like a typical Gold Bug. I've read your work, and I've heard the tune you play. It is a false tune. You can play it. Have no fear from me. Play on. Be my guest. Quote48. Would you support the abolition of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and leave the Indians alone? That is not that simple. The Indian Problem was supposed to be solved with the all too familiar Final Solution, according to past executors of The Constitution, as they interpreted it. Now the natives of this land are regaining power, and in each State, in this involuntary Union, the original owners of this land are gaining competitive power. What will the governors of each State do, in the face of such competition? What do State governors usually do when faced with internal competition? What is the moral thing to do? It is not a matter of leaving "them" alone. Native Americans can legitimately question the concept of land ownership, and you, or anyone, can say otherwise. Power will meet power. This, perhaps, will challenge, as much as anything, the validity of a Federated Democratic Republic, as that form of government is designed to allow competitive solutions to problems. The governors of one State may have a much better method of association with Native Americans compared to another State. Better for whom, at the expense of whom? As far as I know the Native American people, generally, do not volunteer to be citizens of the legal fictions created by the invaders, yet, they accept bribes, or cash, or reparations, or payoffs, or flows of surplus wealth denominated in dollars. Is that healthy? Is that a Federal level problem? Will the Federal level programs, or the Federal level legal organizations, or bureau, wither on the vine when the honest productive American citizens, tax payers, stop sending money to the legal criminals? My answer is yes, those bureaus will cease to exist, who will pay for them, who demands them, not I, do you? Will any honest productive person choose to send money to someone who then spends that money paying Native Americans for crimes committed long ago, or for any reason whatsoever? This is a serous problem, because it is a long, long, long, ongoing fraud. State governors may invent, or reinvent, treaties, internal treaties, and perhaps, I don't know, Native Americans can accept mutually beneficial agreements, or they can also vote with their feet, from one State, to a State where the governors don't willfully plan on injuring Native Americans, and then follow through with those plans. Each State can serve as an example of how best to associate with the Native American population. If anyone plans on, and then follows through with the plan, to injure innocent people, who allows it? Not me, not within my power. Why would I do so, in the long run such a careless choice threatens me. Quote49. Would you seek the endorsement of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and perhaps have ads featuring this person or campaigning with him? When Product 1, and Product 2 begin to cut off the flow of power from the honest productive people to the legal criminals, as planned, that office will no longer have power flowing to it. Will that employee continue working without pay? I do not think so. He may. I do not support legal crime, I do not associate with legal criminals, if I am elected as President I will have to get my hands dirty, I know it, it will be an abhorrent, disgusting, revolting job, moving so close to so many horrible examples of life, not really human, not in my opinion, these people are guilty of torture and mass murder, they are not human, they profit from the torture and mass murder of innocent children, innocent people, and they perpetuate the misery, on purpose, for profit, or just for fun. I don't know, and I don't want to know. My plan works so as to limit all association with the legal criminals, to cut the link, to sever the connection. In order to accomplish the goal I will have to get right in there and start pointing out each criminal, on T.V., live, show the world who they are, ask each of them why they are doing what they are doing, follow them as they try to hide, and look at it happening in your own mind. The halls of congress will be vacant before long. Who will be left to face the music? The ones who can't answer honest questions with honest answers without confessing guilt will run and hide. Ron Paul won't be there; if I win, he retires. I may find Rand Paul. We can chat. I may find Dennis Kucinich. Who else? Campaigning with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service? I'm not on that bus. Quote50. Given the choice of two evils, should a person abstain from voting or vote for the lesser evil? Are you experiencing a fit of guilt, and you wish for company? I do not vote because voting, to me, lends only psychological support to the legal criminals, voting is rigged, and I know it. You may think that choosing to not support the legal criminals is evil, and that may work in your mind, for whatever reason you invent. People who vote for liars are people who hire liars, and liars with that much power do what liars with that much power do, they torture, and they mass murder, so you can massage your guilt with your question, but I'm not buying into that lie. Anyone who add material (economic) or psychological (political) support to torturers and mass murderers are by that exact measure guilty of that exact thing. If knowing that causes you to invent fellows who share you misery, that is your choice, not mine. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, First a mood setting song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bA1hYNMi74&feature=player_embedded#at=151 While that is playing I set about introducing the next link that is a report offered to you by Ron Paul on what I call The Problem, and the cause of The Problem, which I call Legal Crime. Legal criminals enforces abject obedience, everything they say is true every time they say anything, and you are punished. You are punished. There needs to be no reason, you are not allowed to even think that there needs to be a reason, you are not allowed to even question your enslavement, when Legal Criminals enforce The Problem to the limit. What is the limit? May I remind you of something, in case you are not quite sure as to the full measure of The Problem as I've described it. Constitution of the United States You can apply common sense in the effort to understand the full meaning of that law. You don't need a lawyer. Your superiors dictate to you, that is it, do not question that fact, if you do question that fact, and if you do then realize the need to disobey, you will be made to pay for all costs spent in defeating you, and if you then question your debt, for having paid for the enforcement of your blind obedience, you will be punished, since such questions are illegal, you cannot question the law enforcers power to punish you. Do you understand the full measure of The Problem by simple application of common sense? If your masters convince you that you can't even question their acts, their actions, then they can make you grovel, prostrate yourself before them, they can run red hot steel rods up your ass, and you have to beg for more, or else, and you have to, without question, offer your loved one's up to them, to pleasure them, to serve every desire they can dream up. You think I am crazy? You are sending torturing mass murderers your power to survive, and what do you think they are going to do with that power that you once had, the same power you will need once you regain control of simple, common, sense? Some common sense may be the order or the day, if you please, and as an exception to the rule, common sense is offered to you through an exceptional human being named Ron Paul: http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul752.html While you read that I'm going to listen to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbI0cMyyw_M The debt ceiling debate is providing plenty of opportunity for political theater in Washington. Proponents of raising the debt ceiling are throwing around the usual scare tactics and misinformation in order to intimidate opponents into accepting more debt and taxes. It is important to distinguish the truth from the propaganda. That bears repeating: It is important to distinguish the truth from the propaganda. This is a default. Just because it is a default on the people and not the banks and foreign holders of our debt does not mean it doesn't count. Look people, you are not listening, perhaps, as you can see, in the words quoted above, the person, Ron Paul, is guilty of questioning the law. His superiors allow him to do so, for now. But the problem is not that the people are not taxed enough. The government has managed to run up $61.6 trillion in unfunded liabilities, which works out to $528,000 per household. A tax policy that would aim to extract even half that amount of money from American families would be unimaginably draconian, and not unlike attempting to squeeze blood from a turnip. This is, unequivocally, a spending problem brought about by a dramatically inflated view of the proper role of government in a free society. Ron Paul uses the word DRACONIAN, and it may be a good idea to look up that word, and make sure that the meaning of that word is well understood, as I think that Ron Paul is very good at choosing words, so as to convey accurate meaning, instead of the typical politicians word choices, which are chosen as lies that cover up crimes - legal crimes. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/draconian 1. What is Draco? a late 7th-century b.c. Athenian statesman noted for the severity of his code of laws. What kind of laws? You won't hear anyone else say it, so I'll say it, the kind of laws that are Draconian will be legal crime laws, whereby the supposed enforcer of law uses law to deceive targeted innocent victims, laws that are used by criminals to threaten their targeted innocent victims, and laws used by criminals to perpetrate horrible acts of torture and mass murder upon their terrorized legal victims. How about a source? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draco_%28lawgiver%29 The laws, however, were particularly harsh. For example, any debtor whose status was lower than that of his creditor was forced into slavery.[citation needed] The punishment was more lenient for those owing debt to a member of a lower class. The death penalty was the punishment for even minor offences. Concerning the liberal use of the death penalty in the Draconic code, Plutarch states: And to help you, in case you forgot already, here is the modern version: Constitution of the United States Pay. You need know no more, just that, just pay. Do you get it yet? You will get it, and once you do, don't question it, got it? How much do you pay? You will need to know that much, don't question it, but you will need to know how much you must pay. Ron Paul helps you with that amount, thanks to Ron we now know: 528,000 per household Got that? That is what each honest productive American must pay, without question. You can say, Joe, while your knee is jerking, it isn't as you say, that old law was written way back when Lincoln freed the slaves, it no longer has any meaning, you are a conspiracy theorists, shut up. You are massaging your own guilt, for not knowing the truth, as you have been told to do, in your sleep, as you watch T.V., or as you read Time magazine, or as you read any of the official, licensed, and subsidized (with your money), propaganda mouth pieces of those very legal criminals that spend your money so as to keep that money flowing from you to them, and you can jerk your knee until the red hot poker passes through it, at which time, too late then, you may realize what Ron Paul is now warning you. Remember, what bears repeating? It is important to distinguish the truth from the propaganda. 528,000 per household You owe no body anything. Got that? They have borrowed from you. Do you understand that? They then say that you owe them for their act of borrowing from you. How does that manage to become truth to you? Then they tell you to pay them interest on the debt you have created upon yourself because they borrowed from you. It is important to distinguish the truth from the propaganda. Yes, Ron, it is. Yes, Dr. Paul, you know, you know. So do I. You can too. Before it is too late. received $5.3 trillion in bailouts Follow through with that number, please, please, please, please, I'm begging you, please, know the full measure of that number. Your superiors, the legal criminals, the torturing and mass murdering group, the most powerful serial killers on the planet Earth, ever, gain, they gain, a measure of power over and above the measure of power they already have stolen. They have already stolen enough power to steal that much more power, and do so legally. Where did that power come from? 528,000 per household Common sense, common sense, put on your common sense hats, or dunce hat, go to the corner with your dunce hat, and when you are ready to return, and when you are ready to put on your common sense hat, look here: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Do you have the full measure of that power? That is more power in the hands of torturing mass murderers, how much more, Ron? Say that three times fast: How much more, Ron? How much more, Ron? How much more, Ron? If you feel stupid, don't blame me, or go ahead and blame me, I'm not your superior, I'm not your master, ask your master if you can blame me. 528,000 per household received $5.3 trillion in bailouts What do you think all that power to purchase will purchase? The next two links should separate the men from the boys, and the women from the innocent little girls. The men may weep, the women may fully know the meaning of scorn, but what will they do, that is the full measure of the power struggle. What will the men, and women do, once they take Ron Paul's advice? It is important to distinguish the truth from the propaganda. Can you know that the money went to people, and those people have been called Wall Street. I'm not making this up. Check out the link: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ You check it out, I won't even quote it. What money went to Wall Street, and to the people in that group? 528,000 per household received $5.3 trillion in bailouts What are they going to do with that much more power to purchase? What will they buy next? Lap dances? Beer? Next link: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ Do you know the full measure of those links, how much did those events cost, who paid the bills, who caused those events, who profited from those events, and do those events clue you in on what may be happening with your money now. What money? 528,000 per household received $5.3 trillion in bailouts Who would ever need 5.3 trillion dollars? Where would anyone ever get 5.3 trillion dollars? Whoever managed to get 5.3 trillion dollars, take off your dunce hat, put on your common sense hat, they had to borrow it from someone, or some group of people. 528,000 per household What are they going to buy with that power to purchase? 5 new houses per household, each costing 100,000 dollars, and 28,000 dollars left over for beer, and lap dances? Put your dunce hat back on. They are going to help you produce more wealth, for you, with that borrowed money, so that you will be much more powerful tomorrow than you are today. People think I'm crazy. Stupid is what stupid does? We need to stop allowing secretive banking cartels to endlessly enslave us through monetary policy trickery. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpl6ncyxLGw&feature=player_embedded |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1008.html"4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." Gary North has his way of interpreting The Constitution. I have my way. You have your way. Whose way counts? The Constitution was written so as to be constructively interpreted from the start, and that feature was supposed to be a secret, but people, like Patrick Henry, blew the whistle, not enough people listened. The wanna be, and soon to be, tyrants who produced The Constitution, with the "sky is the limit" constructive interpretation feature secret, said that they weer Federalists, but the in-crowd knew that they were Nationalists, Monarchists, and Central Bankers, so that secret was also blown by whistlers. Not enough people listened. The wanna be, and soon to be, tyrants claimed that they were against mob rule, that the ignorant masses could not be trusted with political power, men are bad, they knew Machiavelli, they knew that there are more than on way to skin a cat, yet, while claiming that the mob can't be trusted that is who they went to when they needed the political power required to get their enabling document, that abomination they call The Constitution ratified, and you, and you buddies, will call me crazy. Go ahead, ask for permission, and if you get permission, then call me crazy. I know the purpose and design of The Constitution intended, and is in fact, and it is absolute dictatorship, torture and mass murder paid for by the victims. You can have your way of interpreting it. Gary North can have his way. Which way counts? Before returning to Gary North, I"ll quote from one of the warnings offered by Patrick Henry when he stood, and spoke, officially, in opposition to that enabling document. http://www.wfu.edu/~zulick/340/henry.html Note: Even to this day the dupes still call The Constitution: Federal (when in fact it is National - if words convey specific meaning: not duplicitous meaning) My great objection to this government is, that it does not leave us the means of defending our rights, or of waging war against tyrants. Falsehood is a mean tyrant. Back to Gary North: So, we may be heading into a Constitutional crisis to match the fiscal crisis. That will surely make the election of 2012 even more interesting. Here is the thing, for you to consider, while you think about anyone, anywhere, who is a Friend of Liberty, earnestly, honestly, and willfully fighting against any foe who is planning on, and then succeeding in, enslaving targeted victims. You need to know where the path goes, when the path goes away from Liberty. You obey. That is all you need to know about that path, for now, and when the orders grow more, and more, and more absurd to you, you still obey. There is no limit, and you will find out, on this path. Obey. Obey. That is all. Just obey. Bend over. You obey. Get the picture? There is a red hot poker in the fire. You may think, now, that I am being absurd. I'm not the one on the path to total obedience. So, you may need to ask, sooner, instead of too late, Joe, or anyone, hey, how far are we on this path, and who is doing anything about it, and are the things be done effective? Are we slowing down the rate of acceleration increase along this path? You didn't know that the rate of acceleration along this path was increasing? Take off your dunce hat, stand in the corner, when you are ready return and listen. Do you have your common sense hat on now? Which hat? This one: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Friends of Liberty grow weaker, at a specific rate, and those who plan on enslaving, and then follow through with the plan to enslave, grow stronger. How fast? Is the flow of power going fast? Is the flow of power going faster? Is the rate that the flow of power is going faster, and faster, increasing? What is the limit? You think, no, that can't be, no, that is absurd, no, no, no, you can't take my arm, why isn't my fingers enough? You tell me what the limit is, and see if that does you any good, I'm not asking you for your power, I'm one of the people saying to you, that you had better figure out a way to keep the power you have, since you may need it, and if you are going to be allowing your power to drain out rapidly, if that is what you are allowing, it may be a good idea to stop letting the legal criminals gather all that power up, because they are using that power they gather up, the gather that is draining from you, to drain power from you. Stop listening to all the falsehood, long enough to return, for an instant, to common sense, and then, try to repeat that instant, and if that instant lasts longer, you are reducing the rate at which power flows from you, to the legal criminals, and if enough people do the same, the accelerated rate the power is flowing to the legal criminals may decrease ever so slightly. Then the power flowing to the legal criminals slows down to a steady rate of acceleration, no longer increasing the rate of acceleration that power flows to them. Then, more dunces don the common sense hat, and the rate of acceleration decreases. Then, even more people allow common sense to enter their brains for more than just an instant, and then the decreasing rate of acceleration reaches a steady rate of power flowing to the legal criminals. Less torture. Less mass murder. Relatively speaking. The rate of power is still flowing rapidly to the legal criminals, it isn't accelerating anymore. That is a goal. Then the goal is to reduce the rate by which the legal criminals are gaining power by stealing power from honest productive people. More, and more, and more people have to take off their dunce caps, don their common sense caps, and think about reducing that flow, then turn those thoughts into actions, and then the rate of power flowing to the legal criminals begins to reduce, and reduces more, and then more, and then, another goal is to have that power stop flowing to them. They still have a lot of power, because they stole power for years, many years, just look into how much power they stole since 1945, look into C.A.F.R., follow the actual money trail published by the legal criminals, not for public consumption. The legal criminals will still have a whole lot of power. Many very expensive homes, all over the world, many slaves, many fellow legal criminals to have fun with, consuming their slaves, as they please. Well, there can be more goals, but at least the honest productive people are no longer paying to have their fingers cut off, their arms cut off, their blood drained out, and so the honest productive people can grow stronger, again. Liberty is regime change. Why resort to punishment? Once the power stops flowing to the legal criminals, they will kill each other off, consume each other, and the honest productive people can get back to work. Why wait? All of that hard work fighting them can end in on one glorious day, call it Liberty Day, put that day on the calender, not this year in July, on the 4th, which is past, shoot for next year, in July, on the 4th, or agree to have Liberty Day on whatever day is more agreeable, but get that day on the calender, sooner, and not too late. So, there you have it, then, a mutually agreeable day to hold Liberty Day, and you can use my suggestion, or anyone else's, be my guest, you are welcome, have at it, whatever turns your crank, pick a better day, so long as that day is on the calender. What happens on that day? Are you curious? No more power flows to the legal criminals, on that day, and we all agree to accomplish that goal on that day, in unison, and we can do it safely from our own homes, in our own legal castles, in Liberty, because that is what we demand, and that is what we produce, and we do so honestly, and we do not have to resort to deceit, and we do not have to resort to threats of aggressive violence, and we do not have to plan on and execute any aggressive violence whatsoever. We can even take that day off and clean our guns, or go target practicing, or drink beer, or ask our wives to pretend to be lap dancers, or whatever you decide, yourself, so long as you are not thinking and acting like any other criminal, legal or otherwise. We give notice, more than two weeks, and we decide to use a better money, no more of that legal crime stuff, no more Federal Reserve System of Extortion monopoly money, on that Liberty Day, on the calender. Did you run and get your dunce hat, are you wearing your dunce hat now? Take off your dunce hat, sit in the corner, return here when you are again ready to put back on your common sense hat. Are you back? Did you run off screaming NO, NO, NO, say it isn't so JOE, you are crazy, you are crazy, it can't be that simple, NO, NO, NO, I can't hear this, I can't think this, this is against the law, I can't question THE NATIONAL DEBT! Don't. Ignore it. It will go away. If you have your common sense hat back on, you can smile, and your smile will be similar to the smiles that the legal criminals have on their criminal faces as they take their lies all the way to their banks, they smile, because all their victims have their dunce hats sewed firmly in place, and they laugh, and laugh, and laugh, as their victims try to fight them with the rule book they wrote for their victims, ha, ha, ha, ha, what a funny joke. Once you turn that around, the joke is on them. Not you. When the legal criminal read my words, as I report to you what can be done, and what will be done, to end their regime of falsehood, and all the terror that goes with it, the smiles will be wiped off their faces, just as quickly as their kind will be wiped off the face of the Earth, they will be no more, on Liberty Day, because everything that needs to happen will happen before Liberty Day, once Liberty Day is on the calender. Did you run away again? Is the dunce cap still held by treads stitched into the flesh, or even bone, of your skull? When everyone trusts everyone else, all the honest productive people, what do you think happens? When everyone knows, and we know, that we will do this on that new day, we will start preparing for that day now, and on that day, no more power flows to them, from us. Too bad for them. What is keeping us from this goal? What goal? You ran away again? Liberty What are we fighting? You need to know. You have helpers. You can know. I'll offer one of the best helpers I know, not the best, but one of the best: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/solzhenitsyn/nobel-lit1970.htm HEED: We will be told: What can literature do against the pitiless onslaught of naked violence? Let us not forget that violence does not and cannot flourish by itself; it is inevitably intertwined with LYING. Between them there is the closest, the most profound and natural bond: nothing screens violence except lies, and the only way lies can hold out is by violence. Whoever has once announced violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose lying as his PRINCIPLE. At birth, violence behaves openly and even proudly. But as soon as it becomes stronger and firmly established, it senses the thinning of the air around it and cannot go on without befogging itself in lies, coating itself with lying's sugary oratory. It does not always or necessarily go straight for the gullet; usually it demands of its victims only allegiance to the lie, only complicity in the lie. When the force of Liberty, which is a competitive force, rolls, nothing can stop it, and it is non-aggressively-violent, it is productive. Between now and liberty day, not on the calender, or between now and Liberty Day, on the calender, people will produce a competitive currency, or two, or three, or many, and the one legal monopoly enforcement currency will wither on the vine, because it isn't competitive, it is very low quality, and it is way too expensive. Back to Gary North: The Democrats want to tax the rich. I abhor falsehood, because falsehood covers up all that is need to avoid having honest productive people sending their power to legal criminals who then use that power torturing innocent people, mass murdering them, and doing so by producing more falsehood, stitching falsehood onto the skulls of their victims. Who are these "Democrats" who want to tax the rich? Why can't it be known, the full measure known, that honest productive people, who happen not to be republicans, may want to simply stop sending their earnings to the legal criminals who are rich because they steal all they can from the honest productive people, and they do so by using their enabling documents, such as The Constitution? Knowing that full measure of that truth uncovers the big lie, so, stitch, stitch, stitch, the threads through your skull, and get that dunce hat on - firmly. Gary North is probably speaking only about legal criminals, who happen to be democrats today, and they may turn into republican tomorrow, or whenever the other false title is preferable, so as to keep the power flowing faster, and faster, in the desired direction. I can't speak for Gary North, I can quote him, as I hold the fire to his words, trying to cook out all falsehoods, as I see them. But they are unlikely to get the House to accept this. A legal criminal, by definition, is a person who uses law power to accomplish the goal of injury upon innocent people, by way of deceit, by way of threats of violence, and by way of acts of violence, that is the plan, that is the defining plan, and that as the action, premeditated aggressive violence upon the targeted innocent victims, lawfully done, which is how a legal criminals defines him, or her, self. There is a legal criminal. There is an innocent victims. The legal criminal hatches the plan. The innocent victim is as yet uninjured. The legal criminal executes the plan, him, or herself, or hires an accomplice, and the plan is followed through. The innocent victim is then injured by the legal criminal and all the accomplices, to the full extent of their own guilt in that specific legal crime. Leave me out of it. Legal criminals define themselves, and that has nothing to do with me, I am merely the messenger. I do not pay voluntary taxes, I am not a legal criminal accomplice. I do not vote so as to hire someone to cause injury to some poor, or rich, innocent victim, who does? I do not vote for liars, so as to have liars massage my guilt either, who does? You? Did you go scrambling to get your dunce hat, or was there just one stitch undone for the barest minimum of time? The fear of negative political sanctions is the greatest fear of politicians. What about the greatest fear of legal criminals? What happens when the legal criminals know that on a certain date on the calender all the honest productive people stop using legal crime money, and therefore, on that day, no more power flows to the legal criminals? Do you think that the legal criminals may, then, have something to fear, not just "fear itself"? They would have to get an honest job, and begin producing something of high enough quality, and low enough price, to actually earn a living, without resort to deceit, without resort to threats of violence, and without resort to acts of willful violence against defenseless innocent victims, or, even worse, they have to compete with each other legal criminal for a steadily shrinking supply of stolen wealth. I think Gary North is speaking in terms of the legal crime fraud loop, you know, The Funny Business Cycle, where the game is made to go on forever, so long as the honest productive people keep their dunce hats stitched into their skulls. I think Gary North knows better, but that is just a guess on my part. This is very good news for taxpayers. I know that Gary North knows what would really be very good news for taxpayers. If a taxpayer can pick and choose how much to pay, to whom, and in what form the payment will be paid, then, that is very good news for taxpayers. For legal criminals, on the other hand, having no choice is good news. Pay Pay what? Whatever I say, when I say it, and without question, and hold on there, a stitch has obviously come undone, but I have a new staple gun...there you go, on your way. Any increase in the debt ceiling will send a message to Tea Party voters: this government is out of control on spending. Most voters are becoming vaguely aware that something very big and very bad is on the horizon, but they are not sure exactly what. You think I'm crazy? I am crazy enough to have run for congress. I remember a question asked at a rigged "Debate", where the one who was elected, on schedule, was not attending, and an older lady questioned my speech about the nature of voluntary taxes, in Liberty, and involuntary taxes being no different than any other crime, in principle. The older lady was fearful of bad guys, and so, she thought that Liberty would take away her power to make her neighbors pay for her security. I did what I could to undo the dunce hat that was so well stitched onto her skull, without resort to deceit, on my part, and without resort to threats of violence, on my part, and without resort to aggressive violence on my part. The very big, and very bad, thing, is blind obedience to falsehood, which is in your brain, and peaking into your brain is light, facts, awareness, conscience, consciousness of reality concerning all that goes with demand for and the steadily increasing supply of falsehood. Read the warning from Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn who traveled to the end of that road, and survived to tell you about it. Fear itself may be bad, but a Tener in the Gulag is a reality that can't be hidden from those in it, not without insanity as the escape. Once at the end of that road you don't get mind numbing drugs, they are too expensive, you don't get mind numbing television, that is too expensive, you don't get any form of relief from pain, you don't get it, do you, you get pain, that is what you get, that is on the end of the falsehood road, a steady supply of falsehood leads to a steady supply of pain, and many fellow legal criminals willing to supply pain to you, free of charge. You don't get it. But you will, on this road. You may die before the worst of it, but when, in what kind of world, is death a solution? The Final Solution. Know the road you are on, because not knowing is a default road, a road waiting for you to follow, as ordered. I was only following orders, who me? Most Tea Party voters are not direct owners of Treasury debt. They do not perceive the degree to which they are indirect owners: pension funds, money market funds, local bank holdings. They will not resist an increase in the debt ceiling with the same ferocity that they will resist an increase in Federal taxes. Can you tear loose a few stitches on the dunce cap for a few seconds? Imagine the scramble to move dollar denominated savings once the word is published, honorably, honestly, and willfully, that the honest productive people, as one, are no longer going to use the legal monopoly money on July 4th 2012, that morning, no more, no more will there be a connection between the honest productive people and the legal criminals by that product, that dollar thing. Can you imagine? Suppose we the people, the honest productive Americans, declare our independence from those legal criminals, through that legal money extortion racket, and we make this public announcement today, or tomorrow, or next week, at least by November. So, there you go, it is November, the notice is served, advance notice, plenty of time to get all your ducks in a row, anyone having any interest in what the honest productive American people do, which money the will, or will not use, and on July 4th 2012, we, the people, will no longer use dollars, we will be using whatever anyone of of us wants, at that time, no dollars, too bad for those people who have bet the farm on dollars, but you have time, get your act together, plenty of time between November and July. Legal Criminals: But people, people, people, you are not supposed to question The National Debt, didn't you read the script? Honest Productive Americans: I tried reading it. Too much fine print. I have work to do, lawyers make what serves their interest, not mine, obviously, haven't you read The Declaration of Independence, the first one, or the second one, where have you been, we are giving plenty of time, advance notice, what do you have to offer now, same old extortion racket, no thanks, we demand higher quality, and lower cost to us, not the same deal you gave us, we are not out to enslave you. See how that works? Legal Criminals: I have the dogs of war ready to go, you had better obey, or else. Honest Productive Americans: Many of the people who constitute the dogs of war, and they are very good at it, well trained, honorable, and most are honest productive Americans, who may have signed onto the new Declaration of Independence, if so, as promised, they won't be accepting dollars either, how many do you count on firing at fellow friends of liberty? It may be a good time to write a script of our own, one based upon common sense, instead of one based upon insanity, stupidity, ignorance, lies, and violence. This widespread faith in Treasury debt, despite the frightening balance sheet of the U.S. government and the equally frightening balance sheet of the Federal Reserve System, is remarkable. It is widespread. It is the basis of the retirement plans of millions of Americans. It is the basis of the solvency of banks and money market funds. The basis for "faith" in Treasury debt is falsehood. Gary North is spewing forth more falsehood. As soon as the honest productive American people, enough of them, know that they have the power to choose any better money the will do so, and at that moment the dollar value will vanish. Treasury debt is denominated in dollars, so it will become worthless over night. That is why I am telling you, you honest productive Americans, that there needs to be a time span between serving notice and going through with the execution phase of the plan. You serve the legal criminals notice. You say: We will no longer be sending you our power through your extortion racket money scam, and will will do so on July 4th 2012, you had better get your F**##^ act together by then. You had better, for example, elect Ron Paul as your president, and just maybe, only God knows how, he can save your asses. If they claim that they will be enforcing The National Debt, and that taxes must be paid in dollars, what do you say? You say: If dollars are what some of us choose, it is because you have made dollars worth something by July 4th 2012, if not, who is going to choose that worthless crap? All of us are going to choose whatever money we decide to use, and if we all choose one money, that is what we do, and if half of us choose gold, and the other half use something invented between now and July 4th 2012, that is what we do, each of us will individually choose whatever we choose, in liberty, and if you expect any of us to pay taxes, you had better get your converters rolling and fix your estimate of our tax burden based upon an accurate standard of value, the highest quality, at the lowest cost, we are no longer going to accept less. If you say we owe this much, we pay, or not, in our currency of choice, you accept what we can pay, in the form we can pay, or pound sand, go get a productive job, because you suck at this one. The problem with this optimism is that it undermines any resistance by voters to a meaningful solution to the deficit, which must begin with massive spending cuts. You need to know that The National Debt is roughly the same thing as The Military Expense. The U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) corporate military is employed in the work of enforcing The National Debt. It is that simple, and it is all denominated in dollars. Dollars are supplied by one legal entity, also known as The Dollar Hegemony. One legal person has the power to double the total amount of dollars. Do you have that much power? Yes, you do, but you can't get away with such a crime. Try it. Find out. Write a 10 trillion dollar check. Cash it. What would any one person, or any small group of people do, what is the limit of what they would do, to seize that much power, and keep that much power? The Federal Reserve operators doubled the total supply of dollars in 2008. Gary North reported this awhile ago, and he links The Federal Reserve web page as the source of that information. What do you think is going on in Libya? The Dollar Hegemony is enforcing The Dollar Hegemony. There can be no competition, as soon as there is competition, there is no monopoly, no World Reserve Currency. What is competition? A money that is higher in quality. A money that is lower in cost. Why do the Chinese buy Treasury Bonds? They have their own monopoly going, extorting from their own people, and the very few on the top most powerful people list, are fellow friends of despotism, they agree to split their turf when they agree, and they fight, when they fight, and among those people some are smarter than others, and some manage to cause fights, and some managed to profit from those fights, and who loses? Who pays the bill? Someone has to pay the bill. Why do you think the following law is actually written into The Constitution (amendment): "4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." The most powerful people transfer power from source of power, which is the producers of power, and they must be honest, otherwise no one would trust them, no one would trade with them, and they may not be too smart, about the most powerful people, but they know how to honest produce something worth stealing, in the eyes of a criminal. So how is it that the most powerful people manage to make the producers of power believe that the transfer of power from the producers to the legal criminals amounts to a loan taken out from the legal criminals by the producers? Power is produced by the producers, who are the source of power. Legal criminal steal that power and then they demand payments from the producers who are led to believe that they owe the legal criminals money. The National Debt "4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." Get it? Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Not yet? Dunce hat on: "4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." Dunce hat off, common sense hat on: Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Dunce hat on: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Dunce hat off, common sense hat exposed under the dunce hat: Liberty Day 2012, July 4th, no more power will flow to the legal criminals by way of the dollar extortion racket, here is your notice, delivered in November. You want even more advice on the path back to Liberty, slowing down then stopping then reversing the march to absolute despotism? When we hand them the notice in November we can vote too, I won't, I know it is rigged, voting is not a waste either, it is lending psychological support to legal crime, pretending that it isn't a scam, when it is a scam. Voting is another way by which power flows from the honest productive people to the legal criminals, not in all cases, but a the National level the effort is a net loss for us, and a net gain for them, no matter what "choice" you make. Those that vote don't get it. They are obeying. They are doing what they are told to do, and they care less about why they do it, or what they are doing, or they are willful criminals themselves, and their cares amount to the same care, shared by all criminals, which is to desire, then plan, then execute injury to innocent victims, by way of deceit, by way of threats of violence, and by way of acts of violence. Back to Gary North (and I have to rap this up soon, and it is already too late for a sound bite): They believe in their hearts that, because it is Constitutionally illegal to undermine the solvency of the Federal government, free market forces will not create interest rate conditions that will undermine the full faith and credit of the United States government. I don't know what "they" believe, but I know that a person who does desire, and then does plan, and then does execute injury onto innocent victims is someone who can be defined accurately as a criminal, as they inevitably use deceit, threats of violence, and then acts of violence upon the innocent victims targeted. What does Gary North mean when Gary North says "interest rate conditions"? Typically there are people who desire money to work for them, and that same money, works against other people. Typically there are people who desire that flow of power, by way of having money work for them, as money works against other people, will make plans to have that flow of power working that way, with that money, working that way. Then those people execute those plans. Is that interesting to you? What is the "Free Market" free of, or from? Deceit? If any person seeking money has a choice between product A at a higher quality and lower cost, or product B, at a lower quality and higher cost, which will be the choice made in a free market? A. Expensive, worthless, fraudulent, crap B. Lower cost, accurate, powerful, stuff What is then: 1. Interest Rate Conditions 2. The best money in a free market Interest is the cost of money, to the victims. Interest is the profit of money to the criminals. What do you mean Joe? You are nuts. In a free market the interest rate will go up, where have you been? A free market is free from deceit, or it is not free from deceit, and then it is a free market that is freed up from actual facts, and the freedom of the market is one that is free to be full of lies. Is that the free market? Free to be full of lies? You, in a free market, have a choice between money A, and money B. Which do you choose? Stumped? If you happen to have a whole lot of money, lots, and lots, and lots, of dollars, titles, shares, gold stocks, gold bonds, bonds, notes, accounts, off-shore accounts, investments, insurance plans, retirement plans, holdings, cash, silver, stocks, rights, lefts, upside downs, piles, and piles, and endless piles of money, and you want it to work for you, while you sit back and watch that money working, working, and working for you, all that money working, working, and working for you, you choose one kind of money. 1. Powerful stuff (enforced at the point of a gun, failure to pay is not an option) that costs the workers lots, and lots, and lots, of money, in interest payments, the higher the interest paid to you, from them, the better. 2. Higher quality, powerful money, accurate money, at a lower cost (low interest rate). Which do you choose if you have a whole lot of money, and you really don't want the power of your money to decrease, and you really don't want your money to cost you anything, you don't want to have to pay someone else for the poor investment choice of having your money denominated in a form that devalues over time, you prefer to have someone else pay you to have their poor investment choice of having their money denominated in a form that devalues over time. Which money do you choose if you have a whole lot of money? How much better is your choice if you have even more money? Stumped? 1,000,0000,0000 What is 10 percent of 1 dollar? How much can your money make, if your money works, and works, and works, and works it's little heart out, at 10 percent per year when you have 1 dollar paying you, all by it's self, it pays you, it works for you, and it transfers 10 percent per year more money, to you? You get 10 cents, per year, because your money works for you. Good, good, good, money, working it's little heart out, just for you, and just for anyone else who chooses that money as the one money, the only money, and no other money is allowed. What happens if you have no money, but you can work your little heart out, then, which money do you choose? If you are allowing your dunce cap to bust one stitch, I'm going to rip the dunce cap off now. Gold pays no interest. Gold is stable, accurate, and it is difficult to manipulate the supply once it is in circulation. It is not only possible, it has been done, and it can be done again, whereby the ready, liquid, supply of gold is manipulated by a few people who then use that power to manipulate the supply of gold to make power flow to them, as power flows from everyone else, everyone connected to each other with gold. How much gold do you own? If you have no gold, no money, but you are ready, willing, able, and working, and working, and working, which money do you choose? If all the people who have no gold, no silver, no money, and all the people who are honest, working, able, ready, willing, and working pick one money, the best money, which money do they pick, and why do they pick that money, and is it the same money as the money picked by all the people who have gold, silver, and lots, and lots, and lots, of money, stocks, bonds, interests, titles, patents, licenses, subsidies, contracts, bonds, accounts, benefits, wealth, riches, power, and more power? A. Money chosen by working people (who don't have money working for them) B. Money chosen by people who have money working for them. Is the money chosen by A and B the same money choice, and if not, why not, and can the people choosing A keep choosing A even while the people choosing B choose B? Why is there a law that forces anyone to use one money? Why is there no competition in legal money allowed by law, why is there an enforced money monopoly? Competition forces the quality of money up, and the cost of money down, because a supplier who supplies an expensive, worthless, deceitful, money, to anyone, while another supplier supplies an honest, accurate, powerful, lower cost money, is uncompetitive, noncompetitive, and who would settle for less, if allowed to choose? If all the honest productive people, who work, but who don't work for money, choose one money, and it pays no one any interest, then that is what they do, they don't have any interest in a money that works for them, does their work for them, not that money, they choose a money that doesn't work for anyone, other than a money that is merely honest, merely accurate, merely capable of accurately recording how much one person works compared to how much another person works, and the money chosen, by these honest productive people is incapable of accurately measuring how much someone can sit, and do nothing, and yet power flows to them, each second, each minute, each hour, each day, each month, each year, each decade, and each century, flowing, flowing, and flowing to them, penny by penny, nickle, by nickle, quarter by quarter, dimes too, dollars, dollars, thousands, millions, and now trillions of dollars, flowing, flowing, flowing, from the source of wealth, those who create it, to those who managed to have their accounts grow, and grow, and grow, for doing nothing, if the honest productive people don't choose a money that works, all by itself, money doing the work, not chosen, not choosing money that works, if the honest productive people choose, merely, an accurate, powerful, low cost, money, will those who choose the other money have trouble exchanging their money for ours? If your money is backed by the good faith and credit, and potential to do work, of all the honest productive American people, and their money is backed by all the deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, monopoly control over information, monopoly control over law enforcement, and monopoly control over oil, and monopoly control over licenses, and monopoly control over their money, among the people who choose their money, whose money will be more powerful? A. Our money, honest money, backed by honest productive production B. Their money, fraudulent money, backed by lie, threats of violence, and aggressive violence not limited to torture and mass murder Do you see how the question is moot, since we are duped into using their money? Suppose liberty day occurs, as offered, and from November to July there is a scramble among the power elite to deal with the new, impending, reality, and the force of competition begins to work as new inventions, adaptations, and competitive monetary products begin to enter the market so as to supply the stated demand that was made by all the honest productive Americans according to their honorable, determined, diligent, honest, and willful demand for their own money, the best money, the highest value money, the most powerful money, at the lowest possible cost, and improving, adapting, higher power, higher power still, lower cost, even lower cost, as time goes by, settling for no less, not settling for expensive worthless extortion racket money another second after July 14 2012. Suppose that day passes. What do you think is produced as the money of choice in America under those conditions described above? You may have to allow at least one stitch on the steel wires that sew your dunce cap onto your skull to loosen up slightly for a fraction of a second on this concept, then you may begin to see clearer, and you may like it. Back to Gary North, and I'm on a roll, so other things are being put off, until I have to return to productive work. Americans are not going to experience any increase in their tax burden this year or next year. The Democrats would have to gain a clean sweep of Congress and the White House in 2012 for taxes to be raised. If the Bush rates are allowed to lapse, we have until 2013 to escape new taxes. That is called bait and switch. Notice how the term Americans are used to target the people who pay taxes, while the term Democrats are used as the term that targets the people who enforce tax payments. You are being led to believe that Democrats are the bad guys, all of them, and who then, roll your eyes, rub your chin, who, who, who, are the good guys? Hmmmmmm The Austrian Economists! Of course. The republicans! Yes, yes, the ones who are armed with the mighty Constitution, which is a Dictatorial Nation State, not a Republic. Even if they mean well, well, what do they actually mean to do ? You can't depend upon the authorities to dictate to you what you need, what you will get is a Dictatorial Nation State. The problem is this: addiction. The Communist politicians are addicted to a domestic boom funded by monetary inflation. The Chinese exporters are addicted to Western consumers. Western consumers are addicted to low-cost goods from China. Western politicians are addicted to Chinese central bank purchases of Western government IOUs. Here is where Austrian Economics falls flat. By whatever label, whatever term, whatever word, whatever name, that power creates more power, the fact remains to be that power creates more power. If power is used in China to create more power, more electricity, more electric cars, more solar panels, more power, less cost, less pollution, less toil, less torture, less stealing, less deceit, less wrong employment of power, less destruction, more power, more power being used to make more power, by any name, stays the same thing, more power. If all the power produced by honest Americans now flows to China, and if in China that power is then used to make much more power, more power, and more power, what happens? People in American grow weaker. People in China grow more powerful. What happens if you follow the money? You will find out that power is being stolen from the honest productive American people and that power is being sent to empower all the enemies of the honest American people and as soon as is inhumanly possible there will be a war between the honest, but gullible American people, and the honest, but gullible Chines people, and the single global money monopoly power will transfer to China, instead of the single global money monopoly being based in American, The Federal Reserve legal entity - to be precise. The power flowing to China, as far as I know, is causing massive torture, and massive murder, in China, along with massive production of more power, the costs are high, borne by the honest Chinese people, and the profits are high, stolen by whomever has the most power, and that group may not have any affiliation to any Nation whatsoever, or any affiliation to anyone other than that group, and that group may, or may not print their own stationary, and place adds in the paper, or on T.V., or in the World Wide Web. China is being polluted, as far as I know, the air they breath is costing them a whole lot more, now that China is on the BOOM cycle, on schedule. Who knows best how to produce the highest quality life, at the lowest cost? The Austrian Economists, and no one else? Do you believe it? If the honest productive Chinese people sever their connection to their legal criminals before we do, what do you think is going to happen while they keep their own power, employ their own power, to do what they do best, while we remain firmly connected to our legal criminals, with our dunce caps sewed to our skulls, and our power flowing from us to our legal criminals through the dollar unit of legal extortion? Blame the democrats here at home? Blame the democrats in China? Praise the republicans here at home? Praise the republicans in China? That is a false script. A. Honest productive people in America. B. Honest productive people in China C. Legal criminals in America D. Legal criminals in China E. The actual upper 1% of the most powerful people on the planet Earth, only affiliated to any legal fiction when such a false affiliation serves the interests of that exclusive, elite, group of criminals. If power flows from any of those groups above that power must first come from group A and B, without group A and B, there is no power to flow anywhere. How does power end up flowing to group E? Common sense: that power flows by way of deceit. Remove your dunce cap. It may be painful. There may be a whole lot of people trying to keep the stitches in place. Does that make you want to keep the dunce cap on, or does the fact that a whole lot of people want your dunce cap firmly sewed to your head inspire you to have the slightest interest in removing it? Cut off a stitch, there may be tears, there may be blood, but get out a good pair of wire cutters, and cut a stitch off, let some facts in, see what happens. But they can impose the hidden tax of monetary inflation, which redistributes wealth toward those citizens who get early access to newly created central bank money (#2). Power flows from those who create it, and those who steal that power now have the power to double the supply of dollars, as they did in 2008. Use your brain. What can you do with trillions of dollars worth of purchasing power? Why would you create trillions of dollars worth of purchasing power? Why would you spend trillions of dollars worth of purchasing power in the effort to make your enemies stronger, while, at the same time, you are made that much weaker? Who is the fool? Who is driving around in limousines, bypassing security checks, flying in private jets, flying to their multiple mansions across the Globe, as they say, we are broke, we made the same mistake again, we will try harder this time, send my your poor, send me your tired, send me your hungry, I want to torture and mass murder more people now. Oh, you didn't get the hidden message, in the fine print? Too busy? The message: get a central bank for your nation, so that your politicians can declare war more readily and stay in that war far longer. The part that the Austrian get wrong is the part that it doesn't matter what name is attached to the process by which power is used to create more power, which can be called fried chicken, so long as power is used to create more power. The process will be voluntary. The process will be honest. The process will be productive. The process will have a lower amount of power at the start, and the process will have a greater amount of power at the end, and the process will increase the quality of life, the standard of living, and the process will decrease the cost of living, and no one will be targeted as the victims that have to pay for any gains made by anyone else, which measures up as a net loss in power, by that exact measure. Call the process capitalism, if that works for you, call the process socialism, if that works for you, what is in a name? If the name is used by honest productive people then the name becomes something usable to the legal criminals, as a false front. There is historical precedent. Back when the Federalists were the honest productive people the Nationalists stole that name, and used that name as a false front, and back then the honest productive people were also called liberals, and the legal criminals have since stolen that name too, as a false flag, a false front, a means by which their true color is hidden, and a means by which their targeted victims are rendered powerless against victimization. Socialism was once, back in the days before the Civil War (which was not civil by any measure) based upon The Sovereignty of the Individual above all other powers. What have the legal criminals done in the name of socialism today? Capitalism, as far as I know, is a method of pricing. What have the legal criminals done in the name of capitalism today? There will be no tax increases in the USA before 2014. There will be great increases in Federal debt. No advice from Gary North? How about honest productive Americans, as one, decide to declare independence from the dollar, and all that goes with it, including all that National Debt, and serving notice in November, we have plenty of time to get on the same page by then, we have the internet now. We serve them notice, and on July 4th 2012 we will be using higher quality money, at lower costs, and Gary North, bless his heart, won't tell you this, he won't explain how this works, because his dunce cap is sewed on too tight, perhaps. I don't know. He won't tell you the things you need to know. We can do this, it is not difficult, just agree, one at a time, agree, no more legal criminals, it is within our power to sever the connection, which is the monopoly money extortion racket, let everyone know we demand something that does not transfer power to the legal criminals, and we will have what we demand by July 4th 2012, once we serve notice in November. Liberty Day can happen, it will be regime change, out with The Dollar Hegemony, which is on the way out anyway, the legal criminals are working to change regimes according to their schedule, but instead of us accepting, blindly, their new regime, we demand our own, and we make it, and we use it, and since we then have all the power we alone create, we then have the power to make more power, and none of our power makes the legal criminals stronger, and none of our power is used, by the legal criminals, to make us weaker. Deal? I have work to do, no time to edit. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28646.htmNot surprisingly, many of these concepts originate in countries not enamored with Washington’s influence, perhaps none so more than “Axis of Evil” charter member Iran, which has seen its economy hammered by more than three decades of U.S.-led sanctions. Now Iran is working a program, that, if it succeeds, could help undermine the dollar’s preeminence as the world’s reserve currency more effectively than a Republican filibuster. Anyone, In simple terms: Problem: Allow honest productive Americans to gain too much power and they will have enough power to avoid being victimized. Solution: Ruin the American economy. Problem: Need more power flowing to us than power flows to anyone else. Solution: Control the world oil supplies and in turn control the worlds money supply and in turn control economic boom and bust worldwide, reward obedience with boom, punish disobedience with bust, power flows from producers to the legal criminals during boom as new money is spent first by the legal criminals, and power flows to the legal criminals during bust as titles during default flow to the legal criminals. Problem: Some group somewhere may someday learn how to do without the legal criminals. Solution: Find those groups and subjugate them, or eliminated them. Problem: One world government removes all pretense of legitimacy, allowing the victims to know without a shadow of doubt who the legal criminals are, and all power of defensive will therefore be focused upon defending against the known enemies of liberty. Solution: Constant warfare, divide and conquer, punish those who do not obey with bust, reward those who do obey with boom, and always have power transferring from those who produce power to those who steal it. Know the principles and interests of the legal criminals and the News allowed into your brain will make more sense. There will be escalation of torture, mass murder, serial killing, all done legally, because one group of honest productive people will be set against another group, so as to keep the total power level down to a manageable level, no one power can be allowed to overpower all the other powers, there can't be a world government, and please understand why that cannot be allowed to happen. One world government is total monopoly, and no sane person left alive would then have any other enemy other than the one world government. See it? All defensive power, worldwide, would then be focused onto that one point, and the legal criminals running that one power would have everyone, all, against that one, known, group. There must be division, pretended competition, false competition, whereby one honest productive group is defending against a false enemy, and another honest productive group is defending against a false enemy, and honest productive people shunt their power in the work of destroying each other. Please get that straight in your head as you read the news. Given that the world currently consumes roughly 83 million barrels of crude oil each day, the initial oil offerings at the Iranian stock exchange are hardly going to make or break the market, but they do represent an attempt by a significant oil producer to divert revenue streams from New York Mercantile Exchange, the world's largest physical commodity futures exchange, which handles West Texas Intermediate benchmark futures, and London's Intercontinental Exchange, which deals in North Sea Brent. All trades are in dollars, effectively giving the U.S. currency a monopoly. You may want to take a break right here and watch a very good presentation done by a very funny person, be entertained by the next link, have fun, and I can add a warning to you, question everything, and in my mind I question the concept of "overpopulation", which the comedian doesn't, but watch the link, see what makes sense in it, and be entertained with this example of British "dry" humor. For your pleasure: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159 We have not yet been told to hate the Chinese, and if you have been watching these events for over 25 years you may agree with my assessment, if you have not been witnessing the strange vacuum of information about China, the almost total lack of "NEWS" coverage on China, you have not been asking, for 25 years, why, why, why, are the legal criminals making sure that their American victims are clueless about China. The home grown versions of legal criminals, here in America, have a job to do, and their job is to facilitate the downfall of the American Economy, and during that downfall they are moving our power to other places, secret places, and not so secret places. Why? What are you going to do when you need, absolutely need, more power, and there is no power anywhere? Why wait? Can't you see? You have the power to find other people to trust, and to form mutual agreements, and the more joining those voluntary associations the more power you all have, honestly, so as to accomplish any productive work you can imagine into being. Why would any group in America be rendered powerless? It is a simple question. The answer is simple. You don't need a lawyer, an economics professor, a politician, or authority to answer the question, accurately, so that you are armed with the truth, and so that you can proceed from a point of powerful existence onto a point of greater power in your life. Do not settle for the conditions of life that are being forced upon you, that is the road to living hell, and you have been warned. Get off that road sooner, before it is too late. The legal criminals are setting up World War III so as to usher in a new regime. The new regime will not be based in America, and therefore Americans will no longer be producing their power, they will be required to borrow power from the new regime, and the new regime will charge interest on any power borrowed from the new regime, and that will place Americans between a rock and a hard place. You have no power. You need power. The new regime will be the only source of power, and use of that power, that you need, will enslave you, you will then be hooked. For the past 100 years America was the regime known as The World Reserve Currency, going back to roughly 1900, during the change over from what was then called The British Empire to what became known as The Dollar Hegemony. The Dollar Hegemony is on the way out, and the new regime is not advertized, and it will not be announced, and the only ones who know will be the ones who move their accounts right when those accounts need to be moved, and everyone else will be left holding the empty bag. You can't see it, if you don't know how to measure it. How much surplus wealth continues to be held, accounted for, by honest productive Americans? How much of that power has not yet be stolen? How much of that power has been converted to Gold, Silver, and other forms of storage mediums? Just pick a rough number, just get a figure, use math, simple math, simple algebra, use a factor, use X. The total number of units of power left in the hands of all the honest productive people in America is X. X = The total power to purchase still controlled by honest productive Americans, or "savings", or already produced surplus wealth. If that power is stored as: X/a = gold X/b = silver X/c = dollars (currency) X/d = Treasury notes X/e = Any other dollar denominated legal paper accounts What do you think can happen to X if the legal criminals want to steal as much of X as possible, so as to render the honest productive Americans powerless? A. Trick them into investing in a war, or two, whereby the investors bet the farm on winning the war, gaining control of oil, large profitable military contracts supplying weapons, ammo, food for expendable soldiers, mercenary contracts, and reconstruction contracts. B. Trick them into investing in gold, and silver, and then confiscating gold and silver, or gain enough ownership of enough gold to then flood the market with gold and crash that gold bubble created by those legal criminals. C. End the dominance of The World Reserve Currency, by creating another bubble, doubling, or tripling the supply of dollars, and then bust that bubble by transferring world reserve currency power to an as yet unnamed new dominant currency, backed by control of oil. D. Start a new World War, ensure that the designated winner wins, and the designated losers lose. What happens to X? X is what it is today, right now, a total amount of purchasing power held, legally, by the honest (or not so honest) productive (or not so productive, more like destructive) American people, and after the plan follows through the execution phase X is smaller by a significant amount because, Gold prices are made to plummet as vast stores of Gold flood the market, Dollar values plummet as vast stores of dollars (Held my the Chinese for example) flood the market at the same time that The Dollar Hegemony floods the market with dollars, Silver is similarly boomed and busted, bubbled and popped, and all the war profiteers lose, the winners don't get to rebuild, the winners don't get to cash in on the steady increase in stock prices of Standard Oil, Bechtel, J P Morgan, City Group, Haliburton, General Electric, Blackwater (or whatever their new label is today), or even U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). X is X now. After the plan follows through the execution phase: X is less tomorrow, and X is no longer denominated in dollars, X is denominated in the new World Reserve Currency, and then, then, then, you ask why? Say it isn't so, Joe. Why? Why? Why? You may want to listen now, and if it grows too late, you will have no choice but to listen to all the reasons that explain exactly why all the surplus wealth, whatever is left, is denominated in the new legal currency monopoly unit. Today there is The Dollar Hegemony, in control of enough oil power to corner the market, manipulate the supply, manipulate the price, employ deceit, at will, employ threats of violence, at will, employ violence at will, perpetually, without consequence, power always flow from the victims to the few in control of The Dollar Hegemony, and tomorrow, regime change. What will it be like, being on the other end of the stick, for all those who have, somehow, managed to save purchasing power into this, and that, account in America? What will it be like to no longer be in the club? What will it be like to be left holding the empty bag? It matters not to all those who already get the short end of the stick, and I am describing to you another division, another example of divide and conquer, whereby the legal criminals set those who work, workers, those who have little concern for future conditions, those who just work, and accept what pay they are given, they just work, and they have no savings, their savings is invested in their capacity to work, call that group A, and against group A are those that employ money, employ people, so as to have money make money flow to their savings accounts, so as to have money work for them, so as to have people, work for them, and call that group B. Group A is roughly the left. Group B is roughly the right. Which money would group A invent, produce, make, use, choose, have, spend, receive as pay, exchange, prefer, borrow, invest, consume, if they have, always, a choice between what was the best, and lowest cost, and the next better choice, at an even lower cost, gaining currency power, and lowering currency cost each new day, as a better currency raises the bar, and then an ever better currency raises the bar again? What does that look like, what form does that take, if it is every allowed out of the bag? You don't know, and no one in group B has any interest in you ever finding out; if you are in Group A you have to find out yourself. Which money would group B prefer, in any case, ever? They say gold, typically, but even that claim is muddled in fine print, secret deals, licenses, contracts, enforcements, dirty deals, confusion, argumentation, and all efforts to make sure that group B remains on the right side of the stick, and the short end stays firmly thrust up the ass of group A - with vim and vigor. It may be time to resolve internal conflicts before the power to do so is no longer powerful enough to accomplish any goal short of abject misery. Back to the link titled: Iran Opens Oil Bourse - Harbinger of Trouble for New York and London? So, while Washington prepares to commit political hara-kiri, Iran is preparing to take away a little of the capitalist glow from New York and London. If the Chinese decide to start paying for their Iranian purchases strictly in yuan, expect the trickle away from the dollar in energy pricing to become a stampede. That ought to give Washington politicos an issue to think about besides gay marriage. Honest productive Americans include all who are honest, all who are productive, and all who do not resort to deceit, as a way of life, a way of earning a living, all who do not resort to threats of violence, and all who do not willfully plan on injuring innocent targeted victims and then willfully follow through with, or hire accomplices, to execute those plans, resulting in innocent people being injured, as planned. Left, right, up, down, who cares? Once our power is gone, we can easily get it back, but since we can, why wait? If the plan to enslave America follows through, the ease with which we can untangle that web may grow increasingly more difficult, muddled with even more pressing false directions. When the news begins to inform you about how evil the Chinese are, I think you will remember reading this, and if you have remained skeptical, you will have a much harder time remaining skeptical, the flood of propaganda targeting the Chinese will be understood by you at that future time - you have been warned. There is a vacuum. The vacuum is filled with Tot Mom, Budget Ceiling, Quantitative Easing, Austerity Measures, Terrorist Threats, National Interests, Americas Most Wanted, and the vacuum cleaner motor keeps sucking, more, and more, and more, there is a void, and when it is time to fill that void: that void will be filled with the required instructions: hate the Chinese, torture the Chinese, kill the Chinese, those sub-human enemies of our glorious power are all bad. Yes, of course, I may be wrong, but if you are making that conclusion based upon your first exposure to the picture that I've been piecing together for over 25 years, than you are bound by reason to be skeptical, at this point. What do you know about China? Do you have in the back of your mind a nagging, subconscious, phantom awareness of this mysterious power called China? What is it, in your viewpoint? It is knowledge? Made in China? Do some personal investigation. I can offer a very good source: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/others/trade-war.html Your biggest enemy is the external control over your power to think. You have been feed false information, you are being fed false information, and you are being led to slaughter, along with all those honest productive people in China, by the same group of people, who may, or may not be fighting against each other, and who may, or may not be cooperating with each other, at this very moment, decisions are made, capital does flow, plans are hatched, orders are issued, as the power stolen from all the honest productive people works, by design, to lead us to slaughter. When the next war is over, the surviving perpetrators, those who caused it, will crawl out from their bunkers to witness their creation on Earth, and they may smile, and we won't. It may not be too late. Is it ever too late? How easy is it to simply agree to avoid all of those lies, all of that willful deceit, all of that willful employment of threats of violence, and all of that willful premeditated targeting of innocent victims followed up by the execution of those horrible crimes? Why wait. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones 07-25-2011. "Socialism works there...sovereignty of the individual..." Alex Jones "My issue is that governments have been caught staging false flag..." Alex Jones The line in the sand, in the Infowar (What I call The War on Falsehood), is drawn with tools that include ideas, thoughts, language, math, and all manner of measures, scales, ranges, weights, geometry, psychology, economics, and physics. The line is drawn in each individual mind where the sovereignty of the individual is measures as a power of choice, a power of will, a power of moral conscience, a power of intelligence, a power of reason, a power of productivity, and a power to lie, a power to destroy, which is internal to the individual; separate, sovereign, singular, unique, and divorced from everyone else, excluding everyone else, by any connection other than sympathy, empathy, or any other internal invention, or production of thought whereby the thought originates within the sovereign individual. "The 20 First Century Virtual Terrorist." Steve Pieczenik (Who has warned Barry Soetoro, A.K.A. Obama, publicly on The Alex Jones show, please note) "What we have is sociopothy in this country." Steve Pieczenik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociopathy A sociopath is somebody who exhibits sociopathy, who behaves in a way that suggests a lack of conscience. Unlike the average human, a sociopath does not feel any sense of guilt or remorse when committing morally wrong actions or actions that their society deems unacceptable. Because of this utter lack of fear for the sanctions of society, sociopaths take advantage of the social system and use manipulation and amoral behaviors to obtain their goals. The types of behaviors they exhibit are those that would make someone with a conscience uncomfortable. "Who in fact represents this Country?" Steve Pieczenik "You are telling me that this system can create..." Steve Pieczenik Inside the individual person is a power, by any measure imaginable, whereby the individual can, or cannot, remain in control, or fail to remain in control, of his, or her, own mind, and thereby his, or her, own actions, and that can be understood as the full measure of sovereignty. Why, Joe, do you bring that up at this point in time? Please: think in terms of Trial by Jury. Reference: http://www.lysanderspooner.org/node/35 Once Trial by Jury was invented, and then enforced, each sovereign individual was legally credited with the power to nullify any law charged to any person by any other person within the boundaries within which Trial by Jury was enforced by people. Each sovereign individual, in control of their own conscience, in control of their own mind, and in control of their own legal power to nullify any law, having the legal power to acquit any person accused of any crime by any other person, is a way for you to understand the concept of The Sovereignty of The Individual. What happens when one person, or one group of people, invade, and implant, false ideas, and false thoughts, into the sovereign mind of another person or another group? An army of jurors can then be rendered powerless against legal crime. Slaves can be made to beg for pain, beg for harder working conditions, and slaves can be made to grovel, and slaves can be made to offer up their children for exploitation, to service every pleasure their masters demand, and love doing it, love being a slave, love sacrifice, love, need, and even crave injury so as to please the people causing the injury. Keeping in mind the past, the history, and the facts concerning Trial by Jury, think, please, about the number 12, as in 12 jurors on a jury trial. In the power of that number the sovereign individual who has managed to remain sovereign, and has not been corrupted in mind, not managed to give up the sovereign power over mind, body, spirit, thought, conscience, morality, intelligence, will, choice, reason, and action, that one person, and all those similarly powerful people, who remain sovereign, have a 1 in 12 chance of petitioning, and then gaining, the power of nullification in any case where a law enforcer, of any law, wishes to use law to injure anyone, innocent of anything, or not innocent of some nebulous guilt, whereby Trial of Jury is working as the law of that land. No enforcer of law intending to enforce a law can punish anyone, ever, without the say so of each of 12 jurors, without which, without the say so of each individual, the force of government is completely impotent, when Trial by Jury, as designed in the historical president, works as designed. Then, but not now, Jurors were selected randomly, and you may know why. Now the same former sovereign individuals are being led to believe that the law enforcers dictate to the potential jurors who is qualified and who is not, when, where, how, and what they can, or cannot judge, in each case whatsoever. Pawns, at the hands of the legal criminals, and again the victims beg for more abuse, please, please, please, teach me to be even more ignorant, I am stupid enough to want to be a harder working victim, taking more power, to the limit of my power to produce, take it all, please, while I suffer the limit of my endurance, so you can be happy, at my expense. Please. Can I also lick your boots? Please kick me, kick me harder, please. You are told what the truth is each moment, without question, and another moment you are told that the truth is now opposite what it was a moment ago, and you are told to know that the new truth is absolute, and the old truth is absolutely no longer true, until you are told it is, or is not, on cue. You are told to react to specific stimulus, words, images, perceptions that are constructed with a specific intent, purpose, and result, and it is called by many names not limited to False Propaganda, Behavioral Modification, and Response Conditioning. You are a modern Pavlov's Dog. Salivate when the bell rings, as you are told. What could you have done with all your time, energy, your power, had you not been born on this hamster wheel? When will it be time for you to solve The Problem, where the line has been drawn inside your formerly sovereign being? If you are waiting to be told when it is time to get off the hamster wheel, keep running faster to get to that date, as told. What happens when you solve that problem, where do you then draw the line in the sand? "We are now into hour number 4" Alex Jones (I had to go do some work, now I am back to listen, and comment) "The problem is that no one is ready with an Alternative." Webster Tarpley http://tarpley.net/five-point-program.pdf That is a 5 point plan. Who will draw up a line in the sand that will become more powerful with more numbers standing on that line, standing in opposition to the hamster wheel? What hamster wheel? The legal criminals have focused the power they steal from honest working people, in all places in Earth, to steal more power. The legal criminals have already stolen enough power to have enough power to steal more, that is the hamster wheel, and it is measurable. It is as simple to measure as you could possibly want, or need, and it is measurable in great detail too. Simple: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ In detail: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5823209513192072459 What line in the sand has been drawn by Webster G. Tarpley? 1. Measures to reduce speculation and minimize the burden of fictitious capital: 2. Measures to nationalize the Federal Reserve, cut federal borrowing, and provide 0% federal credit for production: 3. Measures to re-industrialize, build infrastructure, develop science drivers, create jobs, and restore a high-wage economy: 4. Measures to defend and expand the social safety net: 5. Measures to re-launch world trade and promote world recovery: What is the line in the sand being drawn, for your sovereign power to choose, by Ron Paul? I offer two Products, to help illustrate the power of competition as all the remaining sovereign individuals exercise their remaining power to choose. The point is the power of numbers. How many problem solvers who are on the same page are enough problem solvers working with the same solution to the same problem, when faced with many legal criminals who employ the same solution to their problem. The legal crime problem: Victims don't work hard enough when told. The legal crime solution: Resort to deception, threats of violence, and acts of violence What is the problem borne by the victims: Legal criminals use deception, threats of violence, and acts of violence to transfer as much power from the victims to the legal criminals as is humanly possible. What is the solution to that problem (and how many victims are working on the solution): Stop the transfer of power flowing to the legal criminals (not "news") Who has control over all those people who are not in command of their own sovereign power to choose? Have you seen Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports? Have you ever asked someone who has voted for one of the recent Presidents as to why they are lending support to a known liar, a known mass murderer, and a known torturer? If they answer with words that do not confess the truth, what have you found? They may say something along the lines of the lesser of two evils, a wasted vote, or some other false statement, or non-reason, or dodge, as the question is dodged, and the answer is a lie, as the formerly sovereign individual parrots the lie that has invaded his, or her, brain, implanted, feed, and has grown to take control of thought, and action. How deep does the invasion of the body snatchers go, as the first lie is followed by the second, then four, then sixteen, then millions of lies? If you don't ask, you won't know, and failure to ask, and failure to know, does not cause the lies to become true, but that is a lie too, a lie that you may now believe. If I don't know that it exits, it does not exist. "Rise of the New Reich" Alex Jones "You obey" "Obey" That is as simple as it get's, and that is The Problem, and you are told that that is The Final Solution, and you can't, be allowed, to know otherwise. Which are you? 1. Master 2. Slave 3. Neither 4. A sovereign individual in command of the power to be whichever I alone choose within my power to do so, despite all the power forcing me to do otherwise. If you have not yet recognized the power that has invaded your mind, from birth, whereby the message you have been taught, subliminally, subconsciously, is blind obedience, you are thereby a slave to falsehood, and that fact, is a process, and it operates on a fundamental, base, foundation, or level. You have to dig deep, willfully, and you have to work toward the specific goal of finding that base of invasion, it must be accurately identified, you must recognize it, you must measure it, you must become conscious of it, if you decide that you will no longer be a victim of it. It will always be telling you to Obey, therefore it can be found, if you are willing to do what it takes to find it, and then, if you want to keep it, do so, knowingly. Can I offer a possible competitive viewpoint concerning who did the Oslo crimes, why, and having found those accurate answers, what can be done from that point, once that point is reached? The legal criminals do whatever is withing their power to do including back stabbing, torturing, and mass murdering innocent victims, and this is my offering: They kill each other too. When their sources of power are no longer sending them power, they will have fewer choices. They have these choices now: 1. Spend the power they are now stealing in the work of stealing more power from innocent victims (the source of the power that is being stolen) 2. Spend the power they are now stealing in the work of stealing power from other criminals, legal or otherwise. 3. Spend the power they have already stolen, power that is saved, stored, and already acquired, on things they choose to spend that power on. 3. Starve; once their power to steal has run out, and once their power that they have already stolen has run out, when no more ready victims are available, and when no more legal criminals are ready victims. 4. Get productive jobs, and earn an honest productive living. When the honest productive people finally figure out how to stop sending the legal criminals the power that the legal criminals need to perpetuate their crimes: the list is shorter. 2. Spend the power they have already stolen. 3. Starve 4. Join in honest production. Who cares who has stolen from whom long after the connection has been severed? Why is it then not obvious that the solution is to sever the connection sooner, rather than later? Think, please, about all the forms that the legal criminal power takes, what is the form of those powers that the legal criminals have over their victims? If that form is a power over perspective, such as a power to make the victims believe that being a victim is welcome, desirable, voluntary, enjoyable, worth preserving, worth working hard to maintain, etc., then that form of that power can be seen to end, once it is known, it can be seen to end. That form of that power can have a name, and that name can be Falsehood, for lack of a more accurate name, a more competitive name at this point. Suppose, then, that that form of power is no longer working for the legal criminals as that form of power no longer works to injure the targeted victims? Falsehood stops being powerful, stops as power abused by legal criminals, and falsehood stops being a power that victimizes the victims. Try to imagine that event working in real time. Try to imagine how the power of numbers work as the power of Falsehood no longer connects the legal criminals with the victims. Today things are as they are, and then tomorrow morning, many, many, many, almost all of, the former victims wake up knowing better, and that illustrates the end of that power, as that power no longer works to allow the transfer of power from the targeted victims to the legal criminals. This illustration is not a new idea, and it is not my exclusive perspective, and it is not unheard of, or unspoken, in history, and I can offer an example to help you see how this works, from someone else, as someone else has said, basically, the same thing: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henryford136294.html It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. What does Webster Tarpley propose? What does Ron Paul propose? What does my Product 1 and Product 2 propose? End the falsehood first. Sever that connection first, and then the other forms of connection can be severed, not after. If you can't shed the "belief" that "they" will "help" you, as you transfer them your money, your power, your earnings, you will never shed any other connections, why would you? Next, after severing the Falsehood connection, there is that legal monetary connection, and here is where I think other people fail to sever the last vestige, the deep shifting, fluid, foundation, of lies, whereby other people still support The Dollar as the one legal unit of currency. This is where Ron Paul shines. I'm going back to Webster Tarpley's 5 points, to review them, and I may have time to comment on them. I didn't get far into the details before I discovered a very serious missing element. What power is the power that causes any of Webster Tarpley's ideas to be executed? Here is where I can offer a plan which intends to focus power toward any plan having the same goal as Webster Tarpley's, or Ron Paul's, or any honest productive person's plan, to get off the hamster wheel, to solve the Legal Crime problem, and stop the flow of power flowing to the legal criminals. Announce a date, in the future, and on the date in the future the honest productive people will no longer use The Dollar as the exclusive legal money, to pay taxes, or to exchange in any voluntary exchange whatsoever, and then promote that date, promote that event, discuss it, and make that date real, make the event real, make it a future date when honest productive people will regain their sovereign power to finance whatever they alone decide to finance, and in so doing, any potential employee will have to compete against any other potential employee for market share of those tax payments. However anyone words it, their own way, the same principle is the same goal, on the same day, and as more, and more, and more, more, more, more people, get it, the obvious shift in power will become obvious, and the move away from legal crime, and the move toward honest production will begin, one person at a time, on moment at a time, from now, until that date. So far, there is one. Me. The new date is July 4th, 2012, and on that date the power to choose a better legal money will be commanded by one person. Me. What happens if 200,000,000 million Americans have the same light bulb shining brightly above their heads by November 2011? What words can you come up with that refutes the validity of the idea? If you work at that work, refuting this idea, you do so, knowing that you are doing as you have been told, you are obeying unconditionally, you are parroting lies, you are manufacturing excuses, you are rationalizing, apologizing, you are lending psychological support, and you are lending material support, to the legal criminals, because there is no argument that can work against this plan, none whatsoever, because it is a strictly voluntary plan, and it focuses every effort in the work that is necessary to sever the forms of connections that connect the legal criminals to their victims. What words can you come up with that helps all the friends of liberty on any path that can move all the honest productive people further away from legal crime and closer to liberty? Join the march to liberty? When does it start? Where does it start? Where is it going? When will it get there in any measurable way? How will liberty be measured as liberty on that day? With my idea the march to liberty goes toward more productive work, just like any other day, or it goes to a day off of work, if that is your sovereign choice, on July 4th 2012, and when the day is done, you keep your earnings, or you invest your earnings as you alone decide, and you use the form that you decide to use to connect to your investments, just like everyone else on that march, on that day, from then on. It does not go to Washington armed with signs and words. I does not go to Washington armed with guns and ropes tied in hangman's knots. It does not march to court houses, or juries, or mobs, or tribunals. The march goes to a day when a promise will be made real, peacefully, and productively, and without resort to deceit, and without resort to threats of aggressive violence, and without resort to acts of premeditated violence upon innocent, powerless, victims. The powerful people merely decide, on the day they agree with the plan being offered, and they agree then to willfully, resolutely, and unarguably, stop sending their earnings to legal criminals, and they agree, once they do agree, inwardly, or outwardly, privately, or publicly, to do so by regaining the power to choose the form in which taxes will be paid, on a date in the future, well in advance of the day of decision, so as to afford anyone, with any interest, to prepare for that day, well in advance of that day. Fair warning. If, on July 4th 2012, 10 people decide that they will use dollars, that is what they choose on that day, and anyone having any interest in that number of people making that choice can do things between now and July 4th 2012 to prepare for that day. If, on July 4th 2012, 1 million people decide to use gold coins, that is what they choose, and if they decide that they can afford to pay taxes, they pay with those gold coins, based upon their sovereign decision to do so, from that day onward, as promised, by their own power to keep their own good faith, and their own good credit. Who will do what, when the obvious becomes obvious? What happens as power shifts from what it is to what it can be, as promised? Once you read this, you will either think, or you will ignore, as told, and if you think, instead of ignoring, as told, then you will realize that what I say is true, and you will decide now, you will judge now, and you will act from this moment on, and it may only be me, not you, who pledges this pledge, and you may refuse to sign on, refuse to comment publicly, and you may reserve the right to join in, if other people choose to join in too, and you may refuse to tell anyone else, even if you have a nagging desire to seek another opinion about this, and yet there may be two more people reading this, and two more, and then there may be four. And the number of people deciding to pick a day on the Calender when they will draw their own line in the sand may increase, and many may have their own lines, and their own dates, and that may happen, and it may not be a single day shared by many, and it may not be a single pledge to do a single thing, shared by many, and it may still work, all working separability, as each separate, sovereign, individual manages, in their own ways, on their own schedules, to sever the connections they alone have to the legal criminals, and each, individually, each person, stops the power flowing, the same power that will be used to destroy, to enslave, to deceive, to torture, and to mass murder, and worse. What if it does work, as I suggest that it can work, will you see it too? If by November the number grows to be more than one, more than two, and a number that reaches critical mass, like one of those money bombs, what happens, if that happens, by November? What happens between November and July 4th 2012 if that line is drawn in the sand by all the remaining honest productive people in American? What will the legal criminals do between November 2011 and July 4th 2012 if all the honest productive people agree to sever the connection between the legal criminals and all the honest productive people, and more importantly, those same honest productive people reserve the right, and regain the power, to stay connected to each other? If you can't even imagine the scope of the illustration before you, what power do you have in the face of legal crime? If you have been told to never even question legal crime, and you obey, is there anything that you won't do once the order is GIVEN. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, and listeners to the Alex Jones show on July 27 2012. Paul Crag Roberts claims that financial regulation must be returned to the former level of what it was once, in so many words, what does that really mean? I cannot speak for him. I can say that the idea is flawed. The dollar is a fraud, any effort to support it is an effort to support a fraud, and therefore those who do so participate in fraud, and they can do so knowing that it is a fraud, and they can do so ignorantly. What happens if honest money is allowed to compete, instead of supporting the fraud that is the dollar system of legal extortion? Ron Paul, for example, does not say that the solution is to reinforce regulations. Why? I can't speak for Ron Paul either. A. Support legal fraud, by reinforcing the regulations that regulate legal fraud. B. Return back to an interpretation of The Constitution whereby honest money is allowed to compete alongside anyone's effort to enforce monetary fraud. Which money will anyone choose once it is lawful to choose something other than the lesser of two evils? 1. No currency, no connection between honest productive people. 2. Currency that connects honest productive people while the same currency connects the legal criminals and the legal victims to the honest productive people. 3. Invent, and maintain, an honest, competitive legal currency, or two, or three, or however many new forms of currency are invented and offered to consumers, as the demand for higher quality currency, and lower cost currency, inspires invention, improvement, production, and maintenance, of better, and better, and better, legal currency. Notice how many people, including Paul Craig Roberts, including Alex Jones, and including almost everyone, universally, as if there is only one, monopoly, viewpoint, one, claim, that failure of the dollar is bad for the economy. Why? If there is only 2 options, where one option is much worse than the other bad option, reason, logic, and commons sense demands a third option. 1. No currency, no connection between honest productive people. 2. Currency that connects honest productive people while the same currency connects the legal criminals and the legal victims to the honest productive people. 3. Invent, and maintain, an honest, competitive legal currency, or two, or three, or however many that are invented and offered as the demand for higher quality currency, and lower cost currency, inspired invention, improvement, production, and maintenance of better, and better, and better legal currency. If I can invent a third option, you can. If Ron Paul can invent a third, and forth option, you can. If we can, you, Ron Paul, me, and who knows who else, can, then there are many other options. What power is in place whereby other options are off the table, not discussed, not proposed, not worked toward, not on the schedule, not on the calender, not in the works, not ready to implement, not perused, ignored, sent to the corn field, banished, exiled, outlawed, removed, censored, killed, murdered, tortured, and removed from thought, erased from history, gone, forever? What is the interest in removing competitive invention? What is the power that kills higher quality life and lowering costs of life? Alex Jones is helping advertise gold and silver sales. Who has enough surplus power to buy gold and silver? Did you hear Paul Craig Roberts speak about CEOs, spending a few years before retirement, raiding corporations, earning million dollars bonuses, so as to retire comfortably? They have surplus wealth sufficient to be looking for secure storage mediums, like gold, and silver. How about the hired liars, the politicians who claim that we are broke, and that we are getting even more broke? They have surplus wealth sufficient to be looking for secure storage mediums, like gold, and silver. What will they use to pay their electric bills? They won't have one if they buy solar panels. What will they use to pay their gas bill, their gasoline expenses, running their cars? They won't have one if they buy an electric car that runs on their home grown electricity. What will they use to pay their mortgage interest payments? They won't have mortgage interest payments if they can afford to pay cash for a property title, free of interests. What will they use to pay their taxes? Are you kidding me? What do you think interest is? Anyway you want to slice it, think, first, about one possible honest money competitor, as an illustration, not as an enforced monopoly. Product 1 can be: No interest loans on home mortgages for those honest productive people who earn no interest since they earn good faith and credit, which is supposedly the same good faith and credit backing the dollar crime spree. Product 1 is also no interest mortgage loans on business property loans, so honest productive people can start a business and do so without having to pay for someone else's special interest. Product 2 can be: 1 percent interest loans, to the same people consuming Product 1, for the purchase of things that are currently proven to be net wealth producers by a specific measure of accurate data, such as, a solar panel, and such as, an electric car, and such as, a modular vertical greenhouse farming unit which can make algae based motor fuel that is cheaper than gasoline, fuel that can replace gasoline in cars that use gasoline now, without any modification to the existing cars that use gasoline now, and the same modular units can make food cheaper than food on the shelf at the store, better food, at lower cost, to name just 3 examples of things that can be formulated accurately as net producer investments for Product 2 loans. What would Product 1, and Product 2 loans do for the American, and the world, Economy; relative to the impending doom day scenario so often reported by so many people, relentlessly? Each honest productive person consuming Product 1 has more power each month, to spend, to invest, or to save, each month, amounting to roughly half of the current cost of living in an interest bearing mortgaged home. Each honest productive person consuming Product 2 has more power each month in direct proportion to how many net producer products are purchased with Product 2 loans. Honest money becomes available to all the honest productive people as the new money, circulates as currency, and how many people will jerk their knee at this point and claim "inflation" as if that word has any relevance to this illustration of how honest money can out compete the legal monopoly fraud money? Each new unit of currency is backed by actual productive property, therefore there is no inflation. If there is inflation, the inflation will be a result of people who continue to accept, and exchange, the fraudulent money, if that is their choice, since that money will be backed by what it is backed, which is military might, oil, and lies. As people ween off of oil, there will be a steady decline in the demand for it. As people ween off oil, there will be a steady decline in the demand for the aggressive wars for profit that are employed to secure oil interests (which back the fraudulent dollar interest). As people ween off the lies, there will be less demand for lies, and the dollar value plummets while the value of honest money remains exactly as valuable as the homes, businesses, and productivity of the things that back the new honest money. You think, now. Do it. Stop depending upon other brains. They are stealing your mind, thought by thought, and replacing your thoughts with lies. Is that good enough for you? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul755.htmlReading the press releases from the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) we see that the FOMC intends to keep interest rates at a low level for an extended period. Honest Productive Americans, Interest is interesting. Please consider reading the following: http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm There is an essay in that work titled The Parasite City, which is of particular concern, and a basis, not the only basis, a basis, from which my perspective on the subject of interest is launched. You may have no time left to read, after working, and news of current events drag you down even lower from a low point of having expended all you can expend in one day at work, producing the highest quality product, at the lowest cost, in competition with other Honest Productive Americans and in competition with people in other countries who are now subsidized, given your power, so they can run you out of business. You may laugh, at the absurdity of it, as you begin the process of recharging your power for the next day at work. Your payments to the legal criminals finance your doom in more ways that one, and this is not news. Here, again, is the historical president: http://www.constitution.org/civ/comsense.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer! More than a small portion of your power is stolen from you in forms that are very devious, not limited to direct taxation, and that power finds it's way to people who compete with you for your productive capacity, and that is not merely true, that is measurably true by actual documentation on digital and paper trails, not limited to dollar denominated financial transactions. In effect: you work to pay for your own demise. You work so as to have your productive power handed over to the people who then have more power to take more power from you, in many more ways than one. How about looking at one. Interest is interesting. The best way I've found to help you see just how interesting interest is, is by way of illustrating a new use of your power, and this new use of your power can be shown to you as a directly competitive example of how your power could work better for you when compared to how your power is now working against you. I illustrate how interest works, against you, by showing how interest can work for you, and I use two products to help illustrate how interest can work, compared to how interest works now. Product 1 is a legal financial instrument that could be lawfully produced by specific licensed franchises, or Product 1 can be produced in a black market, and in either case the actual product works the same way to you. Product 1 is a home or business mortgage loan offered to people who have a proven history of paying back every cent borrowed, and furthermore, these customers also have a history of paying large sums of extra money for the privilege of borrowing money, and the home mortgage exemplifies this fact. An Honest Productive American now borrows a home mortgage loan and when that loan is paid in full, plus interest, the borrower sends one entire home cost to pay back the cost of the home, and added to that repayment of the entire amount of money borrowed the Honest Productive American will pay one whole home cost extra and that is an interesting arrangement since the bank didn't build another home, all the bank did was to collect your money, for doing very little work, almost none compared to how much work is involved in constructing a home on bare land. You have to pay for the home, you live in it, it is your home, you work to pay for it, even if you are working in a bank, working, working, one cent worth of work at a time, working each hour, each day, each month, and paying for that home, and you pay for two homes, one you live in, and one entire home cost that flows from you to the bank profiteers, not the workers at the bank, your entire extra home cost flows to those few who profit from the legal banking franchise, and that can be known precisely, by following the money trail - denominated in dollars. You are told, by official, licensed, economists, of authority, that the interest payments you make are all part of sound economic realities, and I'm here to help you shed that false belief in those lies. The same people who now take your money, in many forms of taxes, pay those bankers, with your money, to help those bankers rob you blind, and the home mortgage loan, funny business, which isn't funny to homeless people, but it is probably very funny to the legal criminals, those same people, in criminal government, can just as easily legalize a no interest mortgage loan product as they can legalize the legal robbery going on now. They won't, of course, but they can, with as much ease. You have to ask yourself, because I can't force you, why, oh why, do you not earn something for having always paid back all your loans, every cent of the money you borrow, and on top of that, you also pay back extra money added to the money you borrow, why does that not earn something? Not only are the lenders able to get back every cent of the money you used, while they weren't using that money, you also paid the loan people a tip. You tipped the lenders handsomely. You tipped 100 percent at the end of a 30 year loan, since you pay the check, which is the home you bought, and you tip them the entire price of another meal, 100 percent. You are really nice. The problem is such that they are not waitresses, struggling to pay off their own home mortgage loans, they are legal criminals, and they have the exclusive franchise to create the money that you borrow, and they say, and you may hear many people repeating what they say, when they say that the money they create is backed by the good faith and credit of The American People, not the good faith and credit of The Chinese People, and not the good faith and credit of the European People, and not the good faith and credit of the Russian People, you, they say that your good faith and credit is worth enough to create this money that you borrow from them, and then you pay them to let you borrow that money from them, which is backed by your good faith and credit, despite the fact that there are people in American who do things that don't measure up as good faith, and don't measure up as good credit, but you pay anyway. Why? Are you really that stupid? I have to ask, and you may well start asking sooner, because it is almost too late to have enough power left to do anything with the answer once you find the true answer. Product 1 illustrates how good faith and credit works, if it is allowed to work, if it isn't against the law, and even better, if it is encouraged by you, who constitute the full measure, and power, of the law, the tax payers. People who do not produce anything do not pay taxes, how would they get the stuff they pay taxes with, if they produce nothing? Product 1 is a no interest mortgage loan that you borrow from yourself, therefore there is no reason to pay yourself any interest payments, you borrow the price of a home, and the price of a business, on your own good faith and credit, and then you pay the entire amount back, and when the last payment, you earn, is payed back, there is a net loss to no one, since anyone involved in doing any work with the paper work, are paid with profits they earn with Product 2, which generates 1% interest for each loan amount, and that is a substantial profit, since modern banking can be almost entirely automated, where there are no workers, no honest productive Americans toiling over a computer terminal, crunching numbers, or at a desk pushing paper. You have to ask yourself: how much does it really cost to run a modern bank? How much does it cost to build a home? How much does it cost to process one home loan from day one to the end of the term of the loan? You can't go on-line and construct a home on an empty lot, but you most certainly can go on-line and complete a loan process within the scope of modern technology, having charged no cost to anyone, no work done by anyone, you merely log onto the loan web page, fill in the information, the program checks the validity of the information, and the loan amount is credited to your bank account, and you pay back every cent, on time, and in so doing your information remains valid, as you prove that you are, in fact, an Honest Productive American, and you are one of the reasons why America is known for it's good faith and credit. If Product 1 was made lawful by July 4th 2012, on that day everything is in place, then on that day you will be well prepared to turn in your old interest bearing loan, if you still have one, and you can get a no-interest mortgage loan instead, and if you don't have a business yourself, you may start thinking one up now, and by July 4th 2012 you may be ready to take that step, borrow a business mortgage property loan, and begin your new business on that day, when that interest free money flows into your account, and you can start earning your good faith and credit independently, instead of working for other people, if that is what you choose to do on that new day. Why, you may ask, would any bankers want to start selling Product 1 loans, if they make no money? I've already explained how that works, since Product 1 is like the razor, given away, and Product 2 is the razor blades, the profit making product, and the sellers of Product 1, and Product 2 make 1% interest on each Product 2 loan amount, which is a substantial profit margin when considering the costs of producing and maintaining simple financial instruments. Who, you may ask, would be selling these new legal financial products that I say are merely a way of illustrating how competition in legal banking can drive quality up, and costs down? The legal criminals could stop being criminals and they could award franchises to potential Product 1, and Product 2, sellers, based upon competitive bids, or the Honest Productive Americans can reach a point where they no longer want to be victims, and they hire honest productive people into office, with the same result, which is competition in money markets. Suppose I was elected as President, for example, and I began throwing the considerable weight of that office around, and I did manage to get this ball rolling, and the offer was made, and suppose the following legal companies, which are legal fictions, with CEOs running them, and these companies submit bids so these people can begin legally printing this new money. 1. Skype 2. PayPal 3. Ebay 4. Microsoft 5. E-Gold 6. Amazon.com 7. Facebook 8. Twitter 9. Price Watch 10. The Liberty Dollar You have there a list of potential profiteers who seek to gain the license to enter into the money creation business of which there is now only one legal franchise, and that one legal franchise is a legal money monopoly, or State Bank, and they have the exclusive power to raise or lower interest rates, at will, uncountably, and without consequence to them, and they have the exclusive power to double the money supply, as the legal criminals running that one legal franchise did in 2008, and they have the power to cut the availability of money in half, if they so desire, and therefore they have the exclusive power to cause economic boom, and economic bust, any place on Earth, or the entire world economy, at will, without redress of any grievance by anyone on the planet. They have the power to cause The Business Cycle World Wide, where only their insider group know when to sell at the top, and when to buy at the bottom during their schedule, in the places, the markets, they boom, on schedule, or bust, on schedule. There is no due process by which those legal criminals are held accountable for their crimes, and you may ask why, or not, you may have too much work to do, sending them your earnings. Any one of those organizations listed above could submit, and be awarded, their own franchise to begin producing and processing Product 1 and Product 2 loans now. Why wait? I can explain how Product 2 loans could work, not as an unwelcome additional legal dictate, but as an illustration of how competition works to force quality up and cost down, and interest is a cost, why is it ever high? I will read the rest of Ron Paul's message, and comment if inspired to do so, after editing this offering. Moneyholders seek a return on their holdings, and in an era of near-zero interest courtesy of the Fed, saving makes no sense. Words can be used to convey accurate meaning on purpose. Words can be tools used to deceive targeted victims. The capacity to save assumes a capacity to produce. Who produces? Those who produce nothing are net consumers, they only consume, since they produce nothing, so how can they save anything? Ron Paul is not speaking to anyone who has no capacity to produce anything, and that is a large portion of the population. A large portion of the population produce nothing, they have no ability to save, they are net consumers, they only consume, including children, including people suffering from injuries, including people who are too old to produce, including all the criminals, including all the legal criminals, all those people are net consumers, none of them have the capacity to save, since they produce nothing. Ron Paul may be including criminals in his message, since criminals may use the word saving to describe how they store the stuff they steal, but that is an abuse of the word. A criminal who steals large sums of money, too much to spend at once, has to stash that stolen money somewhere, and the criminal can call what he does, or she does, when the criminal stashes the stolen loot by saying that he, or she, is saving the money. Why save money? If you are a producer is it better to save money or use money to produce more, also known as investment? Ron Paul is not speaking about "saving", as far as I can tell, he is speaking about investing. A net producer, a person who produces more than the person consumes, can invest extra production (above consumption) in a "savings account" whereby the money makes more money, which is called "interest" which is interesting to say the least. That would be an investment, not "saving", as the investment generates an income. Saving is storing, there is no loss, the thing saved is stored, for later use, it is secure, preserved, saved. Investment is the use of something to gain more of something, a net increase of something. Get it? Having money make money, for you doing nothing, your "savings" makes you money, and you do nothing, is what, isn't that the definition of "easy money", you get money, for doing nothing? How deep does the mire go, and what is the cost for not finding out, and who pays the cost? Who profits from the steady production and maintenance of falsehood? The reason for money making money is such that money is made scarce on purpose, there is a concerted effort, by people who have the power to accomplish the goal, to cause the supply of money to be lower than the demand for money, and as that disparity widens, to an extreme, the charge for borrowing scarce money hits the extreme high price. Who would ever want to make money so scarce, so difficult to get, that people without it will pay to get it? You may think that the question is stupid, based upon how things are, how things have been, and may I remind you that things are made the way they are because Honest Productive People have been sending their earnings to legal criminals for centuries, and that flow of power has been used to keep that flow of power flowing in interestingly new ways, and in interestingly old ways, so long as the power keeps flowing in that direction. Money can be nothing more than a tool by which a seller of something prints a ticket and the holder of the ticket can turn in the ticket and get the thing being sold, according to the good faith and credit of the seller, who sells the thing produced, and the same seller who sells the ticket. How much is the ticket worth? The ticket is worth one thing. If the one thing is very valuable, then the one ticket is as valuable, if the seller honors the ticket, if not, then the seller of the thing, not honoring the ticket, steals, robs, takes, commits crime, by selling a ticket that is falsely advertised as being worth one thing. How long can such a person, selling things, and selling tickets for things, last, in a competitive market, where competitors sell things, and sell tickets, and don't steal? What is the point in saving? If the seller wants to sell more things, sell more things, if the seller prints up a bunch of tickets, sells the tickets, then has another form of money to use to buy materials needed to make things, the ticket buyers return with tickets, and the seller, by then, has made the things for sale. Will the Austrian Economists cry "Inflation"? Money can be anything, or it can be only one thing, and if it is only one thing, then the single producer can make the one thing very scarce, and cause a bust, where the price for money, the interest rate, is very high, and then the one producer can produce and sell an abundant supply of money, giving it away, even paying people to use it, to cause a boom, and so much money is available that no one has to pay anyone any interest, and then do that routine over, and over, and over, again, which is called The Business Cycle, when there is only one money. If one producer of money is working the customers like victims, with The Business Cycle, why can't another producer of money be allowed to compete? What happens to the producer of money who is working the customers like victims with The Business Cycle when a competitor is not working the customers like victims with The Business Cycle? Which money will you choose if you have a choice? A. The low quality high cost money. B. The high quality low cost money. How would you know the difference? You don't? Why? Ask Ron Paul? Seriously? Personal answers from Ron Paul are scarce, and I think he charges a very high price for such access, unless he is selling something else in the deal. Money can be anything to any two, or more, people. Those who use money to commit crimes will either be found out, and avoided, whereby their money is of low quality, and high cost, or such criminals will remain unaccounted for, and they will perpetuate their crime spree indefinitely. Ask anyone, but me, and see if you get any response, let alone a reasonable response, to the question of money quality and money cost, where the question asks which money, in a free market, will be the highest quality money, at the lowest cost, see what you get, then tell me, please. Money can be produced by you as you work to sell a product that you don't yet have the funds to make, and you print up tickets to sell to people who want to buy what you will make, and that process buys for you a market survey, using the money you print at home, on toilet paper, if needed, used toilet paper, if needed, and if the thing you want to make, and sell, is demanded, your money will sell, and the money you sell will circulate back to you, once you have the power to make the thing that is proven to be in demand, since you have sold used toilet paper to people so that they have a claim on your future production. What do you receive as payment for the sale of your used toilet paper money? What do you need to make the thing you want to produce? Do you need a truck load of wood? Who is selling the wood? What does he, or she need? Why does anyone cut their production down so as to cause scarcity, so as to cause the price to go up, so as to increase the flow of power to them, from their customers, on purpose? Because they can. Because no one else is in competition, because choosing to cut production down, so as to cause scarcity, so as to cause the price to go up, so as to increase the flow of power to them, from their customers, on purpose, has no negative consequence, because there are no competitors who won't choose to make the supply scarce, so as to cause the price to go up, so as to increase the flow of power to them, from their customers. That is why the law criminals use law to destroy competition, where ever, and when ever, competition arises. If there is a high interest rate, ask, please, ask, where is the competition? Where can I get higher quality money, at a lower cost, while that one producer of money is purposefully making money scarce, so as to cause the price to go up, so as to increase the flow of power to them, from their customers? Ask Ron Paul. Ask me, while you have me, in case you do get a chance to ask Ron Paul, or any potential "representative" of The Honest Productive Americans, so you can practice on me, I'll be the practice dummy, you can ask me these questions, to get an idea of the scale of answers, from best answer to worst possible answer, and as far as you are concerned, I suppose, my answers will set the lower limit. Once you have the lower limit, of worst answers, from me, you can gauge those higher quality answers that you may someday get from your potential "representatives", to see if their answers reach my lower limit level. Let me set the bar very low, and see if it is low enough to get down to the lies offered by the hired liars. You are hiring professional liars, right, so my accurate answers are the lower limit, because they are so truthful, and that won't ever do, but, you do need to know how good the employees lie, so don't you need a standard from which to measure the quality of the lie you are buying? Combined with the still-shaky condition of the banking and financial sector, it is not surprising that much of the recently-created easy money has flowed into tangibles such as agricultural commodities, metals, and land. Listen people, the use of the words "easy money" is deceptive in the extreme. I'm sorry to have to burst your bubble here, but in my own best interest the truth needs to be reported. Back when the legal criminals were creating the boom part of their business cycle in the housing market they were pushing something called "liar loans", which was not easy money, it was criminal fraud made legal, which isn't easy, as confessed by the people who were threatened with their jobs if they didn't commit these fraudulent transactions, these "stated income" frauds. That is not "easy money". If you earn a high credit rating, why does that not earn, for you, a low interest charge? There is nothing easy about earning a high credit rating. To blame you for the crimes committed by criminals is to charge you a high interest rate for the willful crimes committed by legal criminals. To punish you, by charging you a high interest rate, while you have worked hard to earn a high credit rating, is called collective punishment. A few people, or a number of people involved in "liar loans", commit fraud, are coerced into participating in fraud, and you pay for it, as you are being blamed for this "easy money" scam. You think I'm kidding? What is the solution to "easy money"? High interest rates. Who pays high interest rates? Everyone. Why? Because. Why? Because of "easy money". Really, you mean: everyone has to pay for the crimes committed by a few people involved in the liar loan scam, as the legal criminals boom the housing market, so as to know when to sell at the top of the boom, and then the legal criminals bust the housing market, so as to know when to start buying again, and the solution to that "easy money" problem is to raise interest rates on everyone, including all the Honest Productive Americans who earn difficult money, by honestly producing high quality products, at low cost, despite having their power stolen and used to make their competition more powerful? Really? The Fed's easy money policy has also enabled the federal government to increase its total debt by 56% since 2008, an increase of over $5 trillion. There isn't anything easy about working your ass off for 30 years to pay off one home mortgage so as to own a home while having to work twice as much so as to pay for the equivalent of an entire second home, working twice as much as needed just to pay off one home. That is not easy money. That is almost exactly twice as not easy as it can be, but isn't, because The Federal Reserve System of Extortion is a money monopoly, and therefore there is no effective legal money competition, which would reward people who earn good credit, by lowering their costs of borrowing money, since they generate no cost, and since the opposite is true, they, The Honest Productive Americans, are the source of backing for money, the good faith and credit of The American People. What do you think happens when criminals are rewarded with "easy money", while, at the same time, those who work hard to produce the value backing the money are punished, collectively, for the crimes of the few? Reward crime, and what do you think will happen? Punish honest hard work and what do you think will happen? Confused? Stop being confused, it is powerless. Thanks to the Fed driving down interest rates and purchasing debt as fast as the Treasury has issued it, the federal government faces a crunch not only in terms of running up against the debt ceiling, but also in the structure of the debt. That is another bubble that can be burst, and too bad for those who believe in that bubble. Belief in falsehood is an exploitable weakness. The reason why the home grown legal criminals are forced to lower interest rates is attributable, directly, to competitive forces - worldwide. We, in America, are not the only source of legal crime money. There are competitors. The competitors can play the same game, they can cause their own booms and busts in their own lands, their turf, and they can suck their productive capacity down to negative capacity faster than our home grown legal criminals can, and when they do that, we are relatively more powerful, because our productive capacity is not as quickly stolen from us, used against us, and that is competition. China, for example, can force The Dollar Hegemony, to quicken the pace, or arrest the pace, at which The Dollar Hegemony steals the productive capacity from it's victims, because China adjusts the rate at which the productive capacity is stolen from its victims. If The Dollar Hegemony steals too much productive capacity from its victims too quickly, while China is increasing the productive capacity of its victims, allowing the honest productive Chinese people to control more of their earnings, so that the honest productive Chinese people can do what they do best, which is produce honestly, then The Dollar Hegemony will eventually lose dominance, or World Reserve Currency Status, if that disparity is allowed to continue, on schedule. Raising interest rates, at home, while China is on the boom schedule, will cause a sudden, and rapid, and off schedule, unwanted, dollar value reduction, because the productive capacity of The Honest Productive Americans will be reduced as rapidly, as suddenly, and that is not on the schedule at this time. War is on the schedule at this time. World War III is on the schedule at this time. Interest rates have to be low, at this time, because The Honest Productive American People have to make all the products required to be the powerful opposing force which will fight the opposition in the war that is on the schedule. Why are the Honest Productive Chinese People not realizing the benefits of a free market? Why are most, if not all, the profits flowing to the same few people as those same few people collect the profits from The Dollar Hegemony extortion racket? Where is the actual power to purchase flowing, and what is being bought? In 2008 The Federal Reserve System of Extortion operators doubled the money supply. They borrowed an amount of money from The Honest Productive American People that was equal to the entire amount of dollars already in circulation. What did they buy with that money? The are buying World War III. They don't want you to know, it is a trade secret, and it is very interesting, but scary, so you may want to close your eyes, cover your ears, and shut your mouth, this is information that is not for public consumption, and it is information that is on a need to know basis. You don't need to know this information. You need to get your head down, you need to grovel when told, you need to work harder, and you need to get by with much less, and when told you must obey, without question. This is America, home of the obedient, land of those who don't question. Get back to work. ZIRP and quantitative easing cannot hold down interest rates forever, as at some point investors will rebel and insist on higher interest rates for US debt. Fail to know the truth, and what will be the cost of that failure? Legal criminals borrowed from the Honest Productive American People, and then they turn around and claim that you owe them the entire sum they borrowed from you, plus interest. Not only is that avoidable, completely avoidable, as easy as the grocery store check out person cutting the credit card of a known dead beat, not only is that as easily avoided, once it is done: The Honest Productive People in American can then return to honest productive life, offering everyone in the world the highest quality, productive products, at the lowest competitive cost, over night. Who, by what power, is going to demand interest payments, from whom? Who gave these people license to steal by that method? When that license is revoked, what happens? It is a good idea to warn all the people who have grown accustomed to life earned by deceit, by threats of violence, and by way of aggressive violence upon the innocent, that their gravy train will end on a date, and time, on the calender, so as to afford anyone time to adjust. Think back to the dead-beat shopping at the grocery store, spending time and effort collecting things to put in the cart. At the check out counter, with a full cart, in line, moving to the check out person, having all the things in the cart checked and a total produced, then the dead-beat hands the clerk a worthless credit card, and it is cut in half, and all the stuff has to go back on the shelf. That is a bad idea. Put a sign on the door, or even clue the stock boys, and girls, and the bag boys, and girls, men, and women, honest productive people, clue them in, and engage them, let them know enough to pass the word, we will no longer be accepting nothing as payment for something good, let alone will we be financing our own torture and our own mass murder at the hands of these legal criminals. Don't bother grabbing a cart. Don't bother filing up the cart. Don't waste your time and ours, your credit car will be cut. The legal criminals will get the message. Their employers will get the message. Those who are connected will get the message, and everyone will have plenty of time to make the necessary adjustments. The flow of power from The Honest Productive Americans to the Legal Criminals will stop, on say, July 4th 2012, and so, you have advance notice, get used to it now. Don't grab a cart unless you have found another way to pay for your food needs, don't fill the cart up, if you have not arranged to earn a living honestly, don't get in line at the checkout counter unless you have found a charitable person to help you pay for your costs of living, there won't be someone accepting your false debt routine at the check out counter anymore. If they threaten you with World War III for announcing your honorable promise to stop paying them for using your power to cause World War III, be clued in. Ask them who do they think will be joining that event now that their gravy train is on schedule to stop on July 4th 2012? The investors will know that the gravy train is going to stop. Who will fund World War III then? Who has the power to start or stop World War III? Who has the power to produce empty threats? Who has the power to make those threats real, by mistake, or by force of will? When they threaten, reply: Been there, done that, it wasn't working, it is time to move on. Thank you very much, but no thanks. At this point this maturing debt will either have to be paid off or rolled over at higher interest rates, both of which will be very costly for taxpayers. Why? Get this straight in our heads people: the legal criminals steal power from the source of power, which can be called by any other name, but why, why, why, would anyone call that process an obligation to pay even more? You earn a living, you produce the stuff that sustains life, and someone steals that power from you. Get that straight. Then the thief claims that you owe them something for having allowed them to steal from you. Do you understand the naked truth here, can you get past the lies at all, let alone to the basic level? Claiming that anyone owes anyone is just that, a claim, and when due process exists, when people settle for no less than due process, there is an accused person, who is presumed to be innocent. In this case all the people who have become known as Tax Payers are hereby accused of owing something to someone else, and where is the presumption of innocence, where is the discovery of the facts concerning this supposed debt, where is the trial, where is the due process, how has it been determined that the guilty are, in fact, guilty of this supposed debt? If you let the legal criminals dictate to you, they will, and if you reward them, they have more power to dictate more, and if you keep on rewarding them for lying to you, threatening you, injuring you, you grow weaker as they grow stronger, and what do you think happens as that process progresses? This is not news. We have been warned, repeatedly. This bus has a destination, and it isn't liberty. Both Pres. Hoenig and I realize that printing money out of thin air as the Fed has done and threatens to continue to do is not a panacea. If zero interest rates and quantitative easing could really solve unemployment, there would be no reason not to maintain such policies in perpetuity. Such policies, however, lead to the formation of asset bubbles, as both Pres. Hoenig and I know. Chairman Bernanke’s predecessor Alan Greenspan fueled the dot-com bubble and attempted to stave off its collapse by resorting to one percent interest rates. That created the housing bubble whose collapse Chairman Bernanke is attempting to stymie through zero percent interest and massive quantitative easing. The next bubble is already forming, although which sector will be hit hardest remains to be seen. Pres. Hoenig has alluded to some possible bubble sectors in his district, so I look forward to his testimony and his answers to our questions. Coincidentally, as you may see, my Product 1, and my Product 2, illustration of how competition in legal financial markets work to increase the quality of money and the cost of money, are reported as zero interest, and 1 percent interest, as does Ron Paul's words as Ron Paul reports on premeditated actions perpetrated by the legal criminals running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, which is a legal money monopoly, or State Bank, whereby competition is against the law, and therefore the quality of the money they produce can be anything they produce, and the cost of the money they produce can be anything they charge, and the only check, the only force, on that power to produce any form of money they want, is external, or foreign, or outside the legal jurisdiction of that legal money monopoly, such as China, or Russia, or Iran, or Brazil, or Venezuela, or all those State Banking Systems combined into one competitive Cartel. When Ron Paul demonizes low interest rates, such as zero interest rate, or 1 percent interest rate, as he does in the quote, he is actually reporting facts that have to do with a legal crime ring, organized crime that is legal, and it may be a good idea to accurately discriminate between legal crime enforced money, and the money that would dominate when no single money was enforced by deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, and so, having done that, the question arises: What interest rate would be the interest rate that appealed to the majority of consumers in a situation where competitors offered a competitive interest rate to all the consumers? A. Higher interest rate B. Lower interest rate The answer, to say the least, is interesting. There are no answers. Try asking. Ron Paul claims that there are zero interest loans, and 1 percent interest loans, available to someone. Who has those loans, and what are they buying with those loans, and if they default on those loans, because they buy World War III with those loans, who will be left holding the empty bag, according to Ron Paul? I must clarify my position relative to Ron Paul, and relative to the legal criminals, and to do so I will confirm my understanding that Ron Paul will end legal crime if he is elected, if he survives. He is on the side of The Honest Productive Americans, as far as I know, but as far as I know: he is not faultless, and neither am I. On my list of faults, however, is not the willful desire to torture people, murder massive numbers of innocent victims for profit, and steal by way of deceit, threats of violence, and horrible violence, the power to perpetuate any crime I can imagine, which are faults on the lists of those people hired to run U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). It may be as good a time as any for regime change that favors The Honest Productive People in America, while regime change is afoot, on schedule, in favor of the legal criminals, as if they need even more destructive power. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, It may help you to know that the legal criminals must get you to board their train heading to doom day. A song may help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZtwxc423jg I do not adhere to organized religion myself, knowing, as I do, that God is Truth, and therefore not within my limited field of view. When I know all there is to know, I'll know God too; which is far from where I am now. But, the message in the song is a warning, and it serves to help describe the fact that the legal criminals must have your consent, your willing participation, your agreement, your thoughts, and your actions must be lead in the direction that transfers your power to them, without that polarizing power, the legal criminals are powerless. Their source of power is, in that way of measuring, the power you produce. Another illustration, similar to the song illustration, is a very old fable, or story, and this story has been passed from generation to generation since before modern organized religion began. http://deoxy.org/alephnull/sirens.htm
How much of the original message has been lost in translation over the years? Is the message simple enough to remain intact as the warning passes from the inventor to your ear now? Confused? How about one more warning: http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. My translation: Human beings are not born with perfect knowledge, therefore a dependence upon other people exists, so as to avoid repeating species killing mistakes, and in that way the species can last longer, so long as one person is connected to another person, so as to transfer that life saving power that can be called by any name including the English word: experience. Stand on the shoulders of giants, or be crushed under the boots of tyrants. The legal criminals have to have you buy the ticket, get in your car, drive to the station, hand the ticket to the officer on the train, board the train, and keep you on it, by convincing you that there are no other options. Know the full meaning of this, please, and once you do, who can stop your power to invent another option - ever? What happens when too many people fail to heed the warnings? Use your brain. Your brain has the capacity to compare one thing with another thing, and that is a very simple calculation. One thing is not as good as the other thing, when you decide to look at it, not when you are told that one thing is not as good as another thing. Beware of Greeks bearing Gifts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_War That reference, of warning, is traced back to 1194–1184 BC The story about the Gift by the Greeks, which was a Trojan Horse, can help in understanding the current trouble. The legal criminals claim to be offering security from terror, security from drugs, security from torture, security from economic collapse, security from toil, trouble, pain, suffering, work, hell on earth, or sharp pointed sticks, anything, any song, any story, will do, so long as you take the deal, and the deal, to you, will be, in your mind, that you give up your power to rescind, revoke, veto, end, terminate, expire, or otherwise disconnect your dealings from their dealings. You are done, the war is over, they win, as soon as you acquiesce, and, on the other hand, as soon as you regain common sense, they have lost, and it is that simple, individually, and, conversely, it is as complicated as there are numbers of different individuals, each following their own paths, to their own ticket vendors, onto their own roads, to their own train stations, along their own paths, once they are on those mired paths to doom, those paths that are scripted by the legal criminals, and then sold to you, with pretty sounding songs, and all forms of false advertisements, behavioral modification routines, response conditioning, subliminal messaging, false propaganda, soft selling, hard selling, cajoling, threatening, pushing, pulling, ordering, whipping, enticing, with carrot, and stick, herding, focusing, polarizing, corralling, entrapping, sheering, absorbing, sucking, blood letting, torturing, and mass murdering. Stop reading from the script, realize that you are not bound to the mast, and realize that you don't have wax in your ears that can filter out the lies, realize that you are participating, actively causing, your own doom, as your power flows from you to the very people who victimize you with the power you once had, the power that is no longer in your control, the power that had made you strong, the power that has now left you weak, the power that is now commanded by the criminals who attach their ideas, their desires, their goals, their aspirations, their designs, their intentions, to you, connecting as parasites to you, and leech all that is life out of you, and that is their life, that is their method of operation, that is their constructed reality, and by the connections they make to you, the connections you accept, that process perpetuates, and you, and those criminals, together, travel down that path, to that goal, on schedule. It is complicated because it is not one thing, it is many different things, each person, each place, each time, as complicated as there are moments in a day, as complicated as their are thoughts in each mind, and as complicated as there are multitudes of actions performed by each person, each minute, at each location. It is as simple as each example being commonly bound by the one common denominator, which is the transfer of power, from the many victims, to the few legal criminals, as easy, simple, and matter of fact, common sense, understandable, reasonable, logical, conceivable, as one word, and all the complexity that focuses on that one word, in English, and you can help me now, in offering the best word, the best single, common denominating word, the one polarizing, single minded, focal point, where all the individuals are heading, along the path, the one word is on each sign along the way, in this one direction, as each person travels along this one, single, direction, all traveling from different points of origin, but all ultimately arriving at the same end point. What is that one single word? I'll offer two competitive, best guess, words. You can think of one, yourself. You can invent one. You can invent a word, of warning, to be handed down to your loved ones, and you can warn them, and when they see this word, they are to stop, and they are to turn around, and they are to go anther way, not that way, don't get on that Long Black Train. Which word? Are you waiting for me to order you to use my word? Are you looking for help, or are you trained to wait for instructions? Here are my offerings: 1. Obey 2. Debt Either one will do, and I can't decide, exactly, which is the better word that can warn any hapless, powerless, willing, able, and ready victim, in preceding generations of mankind, as to which word, in English, connects me, to anyone, so as to help them know, you are on the wrong road, invent something better, or you will continue down that road, and you will meet more, and more, and more, and more, suffering people, more, and more, and more, and more, desperate people, and you will see torture, and you will see mass murder, and death will look like paradise to you, on that road. What sign are you reading, on the road you are traveling? How simple is it to invent a path that avoids that one path? How many people are needed to make that path reach that goal? Everyone on that path, reach that goal, willfully; so reasonably: what is needed for anyone if anyone decides to avoid that path to that goal? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/sarah-churchwell-the-wilful-ignorance-that-has-dragged-the-us-to-the-brink-2330179.html Honest Productive Americans, Before responding to the articled linked above I have an update on the campaign. In an effort to begin practice speaking I've downloaded the following software: http://www.anymeeting.com/ With that software I can fit speaking practice into my daily activities, and record the effort and monitor progress, until such time as another medium of communication becomes obviously higher in quality and lower in cost for my purposes. The software is freeware, along the lines of many new products, where the simpler versions are free, and the more complex versions are sold at a competitive price; Skype also uses this marketing strategy. I sent a contact e-mail to American Third Position, with no reply as yet from them concerning candidacy. http://a3p.me/?page_id=12 The article linked at the top of the page is an example of how the legal criminals box in the efforts of their victims so as to make their victims impotent, like grounding an electrical circuit, the power is shunted, it is rendered useless, it does nothing but waste the power that was produced, the power that was going to do useful work, where the power drains, and worse, the power can cause destruction instead of having the power reach the goal for which the power was produced. Here is a quote: Tea Partiers love mentioning Thomas Paine because they think they share his "Common Sense" (otherwise known as a sense held in common) but they haven't bothered to read it, and are clearly unfamiliar with essays such as "Public Good", in which Paine wrote that, especially while at war (as America currently is, of course): "To have a clear idea of taxation is necessary to every country, and the more funds we can discover and organise, the less will be the hope of the enemy." Thomas Paine, as far as I know, was able to polarize the efforts of many people and help cause specific things to be done, not limited to defense against a criminal army of invaders whose intent was to subjugate an entire population under the dictatorial power of one person, or, in today's terminology, the insurgents inspired by Thomas Paine, and other less effective propagandists, defended against an aggressive war for profit. Thomas Paine also helped many people understand the true nature of government compared to the true nature of society, in his words: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. If there is an invading army, an army that is conducting an aggressive war for profit, whereby there are very few criminals who profit at the expense of all the victims, then as Thomas Paine suggests, there is a need for government, and the need for government is obvious, as the targeted society is being wiped out by the aggressors, turned into a parking lot, or otherwise injured, tortuously, murderously, injured, by the aggressors, for their exclusive profit, at the expense of the weaker, powerless, victims. 1. Society 2. Government (supposed to be in between, disconnecting, defending society from injury) 3. All that can, and does, destroy society, not limited to the willful acts of individual criminals, and not limited to the willful acts of organized crime, and not limited to the willful acts of criminals with badges, licenses, votes, tax receipts, and armies of ignorant financiers. Thomas Paine clued in the potential victims as to the method by which the government operators can turn the tables, turn the force of government, which is defensive, up-side-down, and make that defensive power into an aggressive, for profit of a few, power. Warning: Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. 1. Society producing an effective defense by collecting individual power into one central, defensive, power organization. 2. One, defensive, power organization, collecting, and spending, utilizing, consuming, conducting, ensuring, enabling, causing, creating, improving, adapting, perpetuating, defense against attack by anyone, any group, any power, so as to preserve society, to keep society defended from injury by any force, any power, threatening society. 1. Society -> -> -> -> -> -> -> 2. Government Power flows from the place where power is created to the place where power is stored, and employed, in defense against threats to society. What happens when the people running the government become criminals as the people running government begin to use the power flowing to government in the work of injuring innocent victims by deceiving their targeted victims, and by way of threatening their targeted victims, and by way of aggressive wars for the profit of a few, at the expense of the many, where the injured are tortured, and murdered, for the profit of a few, as the piles of innocent dead pile up? Warning: Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. 1. Society -> -> -> -> -> -> -> 2. Government -------------------- l ----------------------- .------------------- V ----------------------- -------------------- l ----------------------- .------------------- V ----------------------- -------------- Legal Crime ------------------ Our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Know that much. Know how that works. Reflect upon the fact that your earnings, your blood, sweat, and tears, the measure of your productive work flows, and flows more, and flows faster, and flows even more, and flows even faster, so as to heighten your suffering, as you have to work harder, and harder, for less, and less, because the power you were sending, voluntarily, to ensure your State of Liberty, is stolen, and then your power is used to make you suffer instead of being used to ensure your State of Liberty. I picked out the following words from that article linked at the top of the page for a reason. Tea Partiers love mentioning Thomas Paine because they think they share his "Common Sense" (otherwise known as a sense held in common) but they haven't bothered to read it, and are clearly unfamiliar with essays such as "Public Good", in which Paine wrote that, especially while at war (as America currently is, of course): "To have a clear idea of taxation is necessary to every country, and the more funds we can discover and organise, the less will be the hope of the enemy." I use the term Honest Productive Americans for a reason. I do not wish to include anyone who is not an Honest Productive American inside the group that constitute society, where in every state of society, society is a blessing, I did not choose "Tea Party" as my target group, since, I know, that many people use a tactic known as prejudice so as to inflict injury collectively. Do you understand the tactic? A criminal, with or without a badge, will target a society, or any group of Honest Productive People, so as to exploit that society, so as to take power from it, and the criminal uses a tactic by which a few hired bad apples are sent into society to do bad things while wearing clothes, and make-up, and dresses, and hats, and color their faces, as if the hired bad apples were members of that society, and then, the criminals, by that tactic, can punish everyone collectively, for the actions of a few bad apples, that they happen to hire to be bad apples, on purpose, for profit, of those few, at the expense of all the rest of society. Thomas Paine didn't explain things in that way. I did. It is common sense awareness of the facts. It is "held in common" that a fact, like looking at the sun, and having your yes injured by doing so, is a fact, and there are many examples, like sticking your hand in a fire, as your hand cooks, burns, and becomes less than a working hand, a common sense fact, and so, having common sense, it makes sense, to stop sending power to people who use that power to torture, and mass murder, perpetually, as they gain so much power as to have enough power to actually threaten the human species with extinction. I am going to relay a story I found in an old book. I'll get the book, and I will link the title, and I will not spend too much time looking for the quote, but I will relay the message, in my own words. Well...the book is not handy, and I have a deadline to meet today, so I have to cut this short. The Lost State of Franklin is a book about a power struggle during the time when 13 separate and sovereign State (legal fictions) became one Democratic Federated Republic, and then, later, those legal fictions became one Consolidated Nation State. In the book there are references to people living on the frontier, and other people conduct aggressive wars for profit, then known as a massacre, as some of the aggressors are know to be white people dressed up as Native Americans, or "Indians", and guess what happens next? Get that straight first. Society A is living peacefully next to Society B. Society A may be white people. Society B may be not white people. Some of the white people dress up as non-white people and they are hired to slaughter white people, so as to blame the non-white people for the slaughter. Guess what happens next? Are you out of guesses? The people who were hired to protect the white society, are the people who hired the white people to dress up as "Indians", and those same employers then have all they need, all the power they need, to collectively punish peaceful society B, conducting an aggressive war for profit, resulting in ownership of a whole lot of prime land, which is then sold at market prices to people who pay taxes, and people who obey when told to obey, and people who can be frightened into submission, and people who become desperate when they are led to believe that they are powerless. At some point the Honest Productive People may, or many not, heed the warning. Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/celente/celente75.1.html Honest Productive Americans, Returning from a job I have time to invest in unraveling the mired web of deception and from that point of exposure a clear path can be realized, and then traveled, keeping in mind a serious need to remain adaptable, and be inventive, as new realizations present themselves along the way. Above is a link to another one of the few people who are now gaining currency as the word is being spread concerning dire warnings, grave threats, and impending doom, which may, or may not, be suffered by those who are targeted, as the power struggle plays out. This is not news. The reason I picked the above text, that source of data, for this effort to keep the warning alive, is due to the fact that the inventor, and distributor, of that text, has offered a solution, and I will read that solution, and I will comment on that solution, and I will measure that solution in direct competition with my own proposed solution, and therefore solutions, more than one, comprise a scale of solutions, building a graduated yard stick of solutions, in the absence of solutions, within the sounds of silence. A quote is needed, from the linked text, so as to get an idea, an understanding, a knowing, of what is a solution, according to that voice. “It’s not just Model T economics that’s outmoded, so are our approaches to education, healthcare, politics and, yes, the military,” says Celente. “The old adage ‘Generals fight the last war’ is as valid as ever. While the technology may have changed, the mindset hasn’t. The conviction that brute force can prevail in an occupied country defended by guerilla combatants has proven a multi-trillion dollar, decade-long failure. Yet even as old wars drag on with no victory in sight, new wars are started such as ‘Operation Odyssey Dawn’ launched against Libya five months ago, a ‘kinetic military action’ that was supposed to end in ‘day’s, not weeks.’” That is not the solution. That is a wording of the problem, and it is false. I an give Gerald Celente a measure of credit in that he may know better, and his message may be written in the language of victims. What do I mean by saying "in the language of victims"? Victims are told that the problems borne by the victims are being fixed by someone, so that the victims do not realize the need to fix the problems themselves, and this works as a method, or tactic, by which the legal criminals perpetuate victimization, since the legal criminals are the people who are supposedly fixing the problem, and the language that the victims are made to use, the words the victims are made to say, include these words that are repeated by Gerald Celente; whereby the people who are hired to fix the problem fail to fix the problem due to ineptitude, ignorance, or mistake, error, failure, but not for lack of willpower, not for lack of desire, not for lack of interest, the people hired to fix the problems try to fix the problems. Victims are made to repeat that language. "Our" leaders are trying to fix the problem, again. Repeat that victim language many times. Repeat that victim language may more times. Make that victim language true in your mind. Repeat that victim language until that victim language is true in your mind. I don't. I don't do this: “It’s not just Model T economics that’s outmoded, so are our approaches to education, healthcare, politics and, yes, the military,” says Celente. “The old adage ‘Generals fight the last war’ is as valid as ever. While the technology may have changed, the mindset hasn’t. The conviction that brute force can prevail in an occupied country defended by guerilla combatants has proven a multi-trillion dollar, decade-long failure. Yet even as old wars drag on with no victory in sight, new wars are started such as ‘Operation Odyssey Dawn’ launched against Libya five months ago, a ‘kinetic military action’ that was supposed to end in ‘day’s, not weeks.’” Gerald Celente may reach the victims, while I fail to reach the victims, since Gerald Celente speaks the victims langauge, and I don't. I give Gerald Celente credit, if credit is due, if Gerald Celente earns credit for speaking victim langauge, when Gerald Celente uses words to convey the full measure of the problem. What about the solution? Celente Solution: Direct Democracy Before I read details on that proposed solution I have to say two things. 1. The solution to a false problem (speaking in victim language) is not likely to be an effective solution to the real problem. Solving the real problem requires an accurate identification of the real problem. The real problem is not such that "they" are failing to fix the problem despite every effort by the authorities, as those experts try desperately to fix the problem, but they fail to fix the problem. The real problem is simpler. Those specific people, who I call Legal Criminals, cause the problem, they may have been hired to fix the problem, in the minds of the victims, but the full measure of the problem is such that those specific people who are said to be hired to fix the problems, are causing the problems. Fix the problem, not the false problem. Fix the cause, not the symptoms. 2. Direct Democracy can be illustrated very well by an essay done by a person who, as far as I know, is still in prison, and he is being punished by someone for something, and if you read the essay you may learn something about Direct Democracy and punishment. http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm Now, having those two things offered to The Honest Productive People, the solution offered by Gerald Celente can be understood as a specific proposed solution, on the scale of proposed solutions. In random order: 1. Gerald Celente (Direct Democracy) solution 2. Assassination Politics (Direct Democracy) solution offered by Jim Bell 3. A Nation State (such as the thing created by The U.S. Constitution) also knowable as Legal Crime 4. A Democratic Federated Republic (such as the thing that worked just before The Constitution was a product of a specific fraud) 5. Product 1 and Product 2 offered as two voluntary financial products offered by Joe Kelley as an illustration of how legal financial competition works to improve quality and lower cost Being specific about item 1 on the list above there are words that intend to convey specifics and I can read those words, and I can quote words from the source, and I can comment on those word after I quote those words. Can Direct Democracy really work? It does in Switzerland! But is it a viable, realistic substitute for the many representative democracies, which, in practice, are not democratic at all? Switzerland, as far as I know, is a Democratic Federated Republic, as it was the Swiss model chosen by the so called Founding Fathers, as they invented, and then maintained The Articles of Confederation, so as to employ that specific from of government, which was not Direct Democracy. What language works best to accomplish which goal? Victim language perpetuates victimization. What works to avoid victimization? You tell me. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/63832/_quot_the__american_dream_quot_/ Honest Productive Americans, That is a link to a cartoon called The American Dream. It is false. It is written in victim's language. It does not express a principled viewpoint, as far as I have seen so far, and I have yet to get past the false claim that Debt = Money. Debt is a concept, alone, one thing. What is debt, all by itself? Know what you are talking about before you answer definitively. I can offer my definitive answer while you get your answer all lined up and ready for competitive challenge. Debt is a synonym for crime. Debt is a one way transfer of power from the person who is owned to the person who owns the person who is owned. That is the concept of debt, when debt is seen as one thing, all alone, just Debt, only Debt, without any other thing sharing, or confusing, the concept of Debt. If you add the concept of Credit to the concept of Debt, you have confusion, why would you confuse one thing with two things? Confusing one thing that isn't confusing with another thing that makes the one thing that isn't confusing into something that is now confusing, has the added consequence of making the second thing confused too. What is Credit? Get your answer all lined up definitively before offering your answer up for competitive challenge. Do you have a single, unconfused, rational, reasonable, understandable, conceptualized, definition for Debt? Do you have a single, unconfused, rational, reasonable, understandable, conceptualized, definition for Credit? Is one concept part of the other concept, and if so, why do you need two words, or what is the one word that accurately conveys exactly what Debt and Credit form when they are combined? Debt = Crime That is a competitive understanding of the concept of Debt, as Debt is accurately discriminated from the opposite concept, which is Credit, and I do not combine Debt with Credit, unless I have to employ victim's language in the work required to speak to victims, in their own distorted, confused, and duplicitous language. Credit is the process of earning transfers of power to a credit worthy individual because a credit worthy individual has proven to be innocent of crime, someone who produces more than that someone consumes, someone who does not resort to deceit, as a means of gaining power from targeted innocent victims, someone who does not resort to threats of violence as a means of gaining power from targeted innocent victims, and someone who does not resort to injury causing violence upon targeted innocent victims as a means of survival. Credit = Liberty Debt = Crime Why would anyone, ever, desire to confuse Crime with Liberty? I can offer an answer: A criminal, especially a Legal Criminal, can perpetuate crime if the innocent victims are led to believe that Liberty is the same thing as Crime, and to cause the targeted innocent victims to believe that lie, Legal Criminals produce false propaganda that expresses that lie, in various forms, repeated enough times, over time, to alter the actual language used by the innocent victims, to a point whereby the innocent victims are rendered weak, impotent, and powerless within their duplicity, having lost the capacity to accurately discriminated between simple opposites such as Good and Bad, Right and Wrong, Productive and Destructive, Lies and Truth, Debt and Credit, Crime and Liberty. If you want to employ your power to know better, then answer the question yourself, and if your answer is of higher quality, and lower cost, please consider offering that challenge right here, and right now. Why would anyone, ever, desire to confuse Debt with Credit? How about simple physical measures of Debt compared to simple physical measures of Credit? How much of anything flows from the person who owes something to the person who is owed something when such transfers involve only the concept of Debt, without any combination of the concept of Debt with the concept of Credit? How much of anything flows between anyone and anyone else when dealing with the concept of Credit, without any combination of the concept of Credit with the concept of Debt? How much of anything flows between the debtor and the creditor, when the concept of Debt is confused with the concept of Credit? Harkening back to the video where a line of people with money are depositing bags of money in the bank and a second line of people are shown in the video whereby the second line of people are given money, as a visual illustration offered to the viewer of that propaganda, one line deposits, another line withdraws. Be sure, please, that I do know that my words are forms of propaganda, and if you have no power to accurately discriminate the difference between false propaganda, which is false on purpose, false by design, and honest propaganda, which is true by design, then you are powerless in the extreme. Ask, please, as to how those people who are in the line with bags of money, depositing money in the bank, ask how they got their bags of money, ask that question, and then see the relevance of my laundry list of questions: 1. Why would anyone, ever, desire to confuse Debt with Credit? Competitive answers: A. To weaken the victims so as to perpetuate crime. B. To go with the flow, to do as told, to fit in, to socialize, to be one of the crowd, to follow the herd, to avoid standing out, to obey unconditionally, to be fashionable, to be like everyone else in that line, on that road. 2. How about simple physical measures of Debt compared to simple physical measures of Credit? Competitive answers: A. Money flows one way in debt, inequitably, measurably, and money flows two ways in credit, equitably. B. Power is lost by the producer of power in debt, and power is retained by the producer of power in credit. 3. How much of anything flows from the person who owes something to the person who is owed something when such transfers involve only the concept of Debt, without any combination of the concept of Debt with the concept of Credit? Competitive answers: A. Money flows from the person who owes (the person who is owned) to the person who is owed, who is the person who own the person who is owned. B. Power flows from the person who creates power to the person who receives that power; in a moral sense: power flows from the slave to the master, or in a legal sense: power flows from the victim to the criminal, or from a Legal Crime, duplicitous, employment of terms: power flows from the debtor to the creditor (while there is no employment of a concept of credit in this case, rather the concept of credit is a false front for the enforcement of abject slavery) 4. How much of anything will flow between anyone and anyone else, when dealing with the concept of Credit and without any combination of the concept of Credit with the concept of Debt? Competitive answer: A. Power flows from a creditor or creditors to a person who earns credit and then power flows back to the creditor or creditors from the person who earns credit, and the flow is equitable, and the producer of power retains the power the producer produces. 5. How much of anything flows between the debtor and the creditor, when the concept of Debt is confused with the concept of Credit? Competitive answer: An idea can be shared, by the person who earns credit, and by the person, or persons, who realize that the person does earn credit, that the time period in between the point at which the power flows to the person who earns credit, and the time period when that power flows back to the persons who sent that power, as a time when the person who earns credit is "in debt". Why? Why is the person who earns credit considered to be "in debt"? You tell me. A. Person earns credit. B. Person receives credit. C. Person pays back all the power received. Where is there any time when the person who earns credit is a person who is in debt? Why add the concept of debt at all? I'm going to watch more of The American Dream, and if something appears to be worth challenging, I will do so, here, soon. I got to the part where the video exposes another duplicitous butchering of accurate language, and again one thing is one thing, and another thing is another thing, and when those two things are confused, what happens, and why would anyone, ever, want to confuse two things, as if two things are not two things, as if two things are one thing? 1. Public (as in the Federal Reserve System of Extortion is a public entity, or legal fiction) 2. Private (as in the Federal Reserve System of Extortion is a private thing) In order to be clear on why this is now a concern worthy of careful discrimination, between false (on purpose) propaganda, and honest true propaganda (or news), I will try to quote the actual words used in The American Dream: Average Joe: "Where does The Federal Reserve get their money?" Later: Average Joe: "How come the government isn't allowed inside it's own building?" Voice of Authority: "Government? The Fed is a private bank, owned by private stockholders. Do not let the name Federal fool you; this place is about as Federal as Federal Express." What is meant by the word private, in context? You have to stop thinking in terms of being a victim. You have to stop censoring your own power of moral conscience, and you have to adapt, and invent, your own definitions for specific things that you apply your power of thinking upon, in the work of understanding specific things, and you can no longer just settle for answers given to you, where you merely parrot the answer given to you. What is meant by the word private? What is meant by the word private, in context? 1. What is meant by the word private? Competitive answer: The word private is a concept by which a person is known, and measurably known, to be disconnected from the Legal Criminals, and is therefore not subject to involuntary injury caused by Legal Criminals, resulting from that undesirable connection to Legal Criminals, and such a person, not connected to Legal Criminals, is a person who is not subjected to injuries by Legal Criminals, and is therefore a private person, or a free man, or a free woman, free to act without being connected to Legal Criminals in any way, and as such the free, private, person is free to expend privately earned power in defense against criminals if that private person decides to spend power in that manner, even if the private person does so by voluntarily sending power to a central location, such as, for example, an insurance fund, such as an insurance fund that insures against injury by Legal Criminals, for an example of a private person acting privately with other private people, agreeably, voluntarily, for mutual interest, for mutual protection, and for mutual support. 1. What is meant by the word private, in context? Competitive answer: In context, the word private is used as a Legal Crime designation, whereupon the victims are designated as private people, and the Legal Criminals are exceptional, and the Legal Criminals exempt themselves from the victim group, the Legal Criminals employ the term private as a means of discovering who is to be targeted for exploitation, and therefore the word private can be synonymous with the word Tax Payer, or Slave, or Victim, so long as the word accurately discriminates between those who are exploited from those who exploit. The group of people who exploit are called the public. Private = victim (those who are involuntarily associated with the Legal Criminals or else) Public = Legal Criminals (those who invent, produce, and maintain the involuntary connection, or parasitic connection to the targeted, productive, victims) The reason why that is the meaning of that word, in that context, is a direct result of the nature of the connection between The Honest Productive People, in America, and the separate, and sovereign, group of people who control U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), or The Dollar Hegemony, or The Establishment, or The Federal Government (which is actually a Nation State, and it is categorically not a Democratic Federated Republican experimental form of government), and therefore, the relationship between The Honest Productive People, The Tax Payers (the people who actually produce that which constitutes "TAX"), and, The Legal Criminals, is in one word, Crime. The name used to designate one group, victims, from the other group, criminals, is whatever word perpetually renders the victims powerless. Call the victims by the name "private" and so long as that word continues to render the victims powerless, so long will that word work to deceive the victims. Call the criminals by the name "public" and so long as that word continues to render the victims powerless, so long with that word work to deceive the victims. Try it on for size, see how it works, as you remove the words you are taught to use, and in place of those duplicitous, deceptive, words, you place meaningful words, accurate words, in place. You may say that in context the producers of that news feed, The American Dream, are not using the words as you say they are using them, you may claim that the people running The Federal Reserve are "private" individuals, as the cartoon claims, and the people running The Federal Reserve are not "public" people, they are not Federal Employees, or "representatives", or anything having to do with "government", as the video intends to point out. Here you may be duped, while my principled approach allows me to avoid all the duplicity, so as to arrive closer to the truth. If someone has the legal license, or some group has that license, to double the total number of legal units of legal tender, as was done in 2008, then how can you claim, as the video appears to be claiming, that that power is not definitively a power of government, in any way that you may claim that the word government can be defined accurately, how can you support the claim that that group is not a government group, and to be even more specific, and to avoid confusion, and to avoid ambiguity, why not call that group a Legal Crime group, since that is what they are, categorically. There are 12 people on a legally licensed group who have the legal power to govern the thoughts and behaviors of all the people that are connected to the legal fiction known as U.S.A., or The United States of America, and that group is called The FOMC, or the Federal Open Market Committee, and to say that those people are "Private" is akin to saying that I am Santa Clause. Within a criminal connection, or involuntary association, by any name you want to hang on the door, or paint in the sign, or print on the stationary, the facts concerning how power flows, within such a connection, remain the same way; and it is the same way that power flows during crime. Victims (producers of power) ->->->->->-> Criminals (those who resort to deceit, threats of violence, and violence upon the innocent as a means of gaining power, those who cause power to flow that way) Why confuse the term Public with the word Private? If the form of government is strictly voluntary, then there is no one who rises to a position of being a "public" employee. Do you call the person waiting on your table a "public" employee at the restaurant, and does the same person become "public" when they do the same thing at the defense contractor cafeteria? Why? A person working at The DMV, or the Post Office, or City Hall, or The National Guard, or in the cafeteria at the defense contractor's rented building, are working in places where your failure to pay involuntary taxes will result in you being punished by the people you supposedly hire to protect you, punishing you for failure to send then the power you earn, and that makes them "public" employees, in that specific, accountable, measurable, context. Public = Criminal Private = Liberty If there has been, or ever will be, a public government that is not criminal, then it will be as voluntary an association as is humanly possible, such as, for example, a Democratic Federated Republican experimental, adaptive, competitive, form of government, such as the government that was operating when The Honest Productive Americans drove the invading British Legal Criminals out of the 13 Separate and Sovereign States, combined within that Voluntary, legal, Union. When the Nationalists took over that Voluntary Legal Union, under those Articles of Confederation, they did so by fraud, with their Dirty Compromise, their Constitution, which was, is, and continues to be an involuntary association, or Legal Crime, in progress. Note how words change: Pursuit of Happiness Pursuit of Profit Public = Not for Profit (Equity) Private = Legally allowed to Profit What power is at play to make the meanings of words duplicitous, having opposite meanings? What power is at play to make simple things too complicated for anyone other than the person causing simple things to be complicated? Public versus Private terminology is within the ranges of victim's language, for public consumption, and the Legal Criminals are in on the gag, laughing all the way to your bank, the bank they stole, and the thing they use to keep the power flowing from you, the Honest Productive People of American, the source of power, to them, the Legal Criminals. They even leave a very accurate and easy to follow paper trail, or trails, including, but not limited to, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports. Victims can know exactly how much has been stolen, and by whom, whenever they care to look. They tell you that "we" are broke, as they spend the power they steal from you, live lives of luxury, while you work harder, and harder, for less, and less, and for some very strange reason the victims believe the lies, the victims even hire known liars to represent them, as if the victims have been exposed to lies for so long that they can no longer conceive of the truth, even if the truth is spread out before them in no uncertain terms. It isn't strange when you discover the truth, it actually makes sense, that the victims operate on an unconscious level, bypassing good moral sense, and avoiding the nagging intrusion of moral conscience, as the victims decide to buy a temporary stay of execution, a temporary lessening of impending torture, by paying liars, torturers, and serial killers to kill other people, to keep them busy working on torturing other people, murdering massive numbers of other people, and in that delay, as the hired liars, and hired torturers, and hired mass murderers, virtual cannibals, those horrible people are busy long enough to allow the voters, the employers, those who still voluntarily associate, within that connection, to those criminals, time; time before it is their turn in the meat grinder. Time is running out, and the meat grinder is now targeting inward more so each day, as the headquarters of Legal Crime Inc., A.K.A. The New World Order, are gearing up for WWW III, the new Big One, as operations, as far as I can tell, will eventually be moved to Asia. When Asia is being Boomed, American will continue to be busted, and the pretense of being "one of the gang", having made the choice: "If you can't beat'em, Join'em", will no longer be anything other than a complete and utter farce, a fantasy for the insane, a fabrication of complete and utter escape from reality, as the screws are turned as deeply as those same screws have been turned on other places, and other people, as in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Africa, and all over the world, where the Legal Criminals have brought their low limits of bust on their business cycle schedule, no longer will the torture and murder be on "our" dime, since, we have none left to "contribute" in the effort to "Spread Democracy", or win any war, after being resolutely defeated in the next World War. No longer will anyone be claiming that "we" are fighting terrorism, or "we" are the last free "Nation State", or "we" are going to save ourselves from global warming, or overpopulation, or we are this, or we are that, since we won't be required to say such lies anymore. We will be, unambiguous, victims. Please sir, can I have some more. I'm done with that video, it is too fueled up with lies for me. Perhaps it works to help other people get off the doom express sooner. In terms of divorcing, totally, from any connection, or as many connections as is human possible, between The Honest Productive Americans, and any criminals, legal or otherwise, the power struggle is won first in the individual minds of each of The Honest Productive Americans, and once enough are clued in, the false credit card can be cut, and each of the remaining members of The Honest Productive Americans can invent, and adapt, and produce, and maintain, new, better, higher quality, and lower cost, methods of accurately accounting for each members capacity to earn the credit they are due. Until then, until the new Liberty Day, doom will be the destination, on schedule. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, I have two links to report to you, and they have a common message. A. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28767.htm Another common theme, at least among those who are not willfully blind, is that American decline is in no small measure self-inflicted. The comic opera in Washington this summer, which disgusts the country and bewilders the world, may have no analogue in the annals of parliamentary democracy. B. http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1014.html Financial columnists of the sky-is-sagging perspective have searched for an accurate metaphor to describe the current economy. We have all failed. I see a need to support my measure of the common element. Word A: Analogue Word B: Metaphor Definition A: a modern analog to what happened before Definition B: a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them (as in drowning in money); broadly : figurative language — compare simile Word A2: decline Word B2: sagging The definitions of the words, in our common language of victims, can mean anything, to anyone, this minute, and the opposite meaning a second later. That can be a consequence of duplicity. I don't think either messenger above is duplicitous. If you read their work, like reading Ron Paul's work, or reading Dennis Kucinich's work, you read the same message, over, and over, and over, again, where the words intend to mean the same thing each time, which can measure up as something called honesty. Who is accurate? The person receiving the message may want to hear lies, and that is a common problem, a problem that is borne by the person who pays the cost of such a problem, however that may actually measure up, in due time, accurately. I start this message with those links, showing the common bonds that I see between those two messengers, and I prefer not to shoot the messenger, but I prefer to set aside the message, after realizing the full measure of the message, and my intention is to move onto solutions. I have two. Two solutions that work as one solution. I'm leading into the two solutions, and it occurs to me to repeat something, before moving into the two solutions that work as one solution, and the reason that I add these next two things that constitute one thing is reasonable, if you think about it, think about how two things manage to form one thing. Thing A: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ Thing B: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ When two things are produced, so as to have two things work together, the outcome is one thing. That one thing that was produced from those two things has since been called World War II. Here is one comment on World War III, before I move, finally, onto 2 solutions that work as one thing. http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. The products that we, The Honest Productive Americans, use for money are produced by the same people who bring torture, mass murder, and steps leading closer and closer to human extinction, so, naturally, the solution is to use higher quality products, produced by us, and in so doing, the connection that has been made by The Legal Criminals, to their source of enormous power, is cut, like cutting a credit card in half, as simple as that, and you did not hear this from Gary North, and you did not hear this from Noam Chomsky, and you did not hear this from any other messenger. What is the solution that will work? Do you get a detailed, reasonable, workable, logical, understandable, interesting, solution? Follow along with me as I bring the solution that will work into focus on a personal level for any of the millions of Honest Productive People who are not right now personally wealthy, not yet wealthy enough to have so much power as to be able to have their accumulated power working to make even more power, and this can be understood well. I am speaking about the millions of people who are not yet in a position to sit at home, playing games, doing nothing productive, since they don't have to do anything productive, since they have an account somewhere, denominated in dollars, and that account is large enough to generate a steady increase by way of interest payments sent into that "savings" account. I'm not speaking to those people, who are set for life, with lots, and lots, and lots, of power, so much power that their power grows larger, and larger, just because it is so large. Those people can worry about what they are going to do to protect their steady flow of power flowing to their very larger stores of power, and I hope they get what they truly want, deep down inside their souls. I have no desire to connect with them in any way whatsoever, and so I speak to all the people who are not in that group of self sustaining wealthy people, who may be as Honest, and as Productive, as any other person. Gather around all those who are not yet powerful enough to have more power flow to them just because they already have lots of power. Get all those less powerful people in one group, and then think about what any of those people can do to solve the growing problem of very powerful people, very few in number, managing to steal power from everyone else, and then they use that stolen power to perpetuate that flow of power from everyone else, to them. Imagine that group of people, those who are not "independently wealthy", those in the group that my message intends to reach, imagine that, be one of those people for now, if you are not one already and sit down and listen carefully, listen as if you are going to hear something worth hearing. Imagine, please, that my Product 1, and my Product 2 proposal is enacted into National law, and these new products, that intend to accomplish one goal, are made available world wide, and most certainly made available to you, all of you, from sea to shining sea, across America. How does that work for you? It does not get you something for nothing, and that should be understood right away. Just like the independently wealthy person may have earned all the wealth that that person owns, so as to have all that power make more power, you have earned a credit rating. If you are productive, and you consistently produce more than you consume, by any measure, that measures up as exactly that, you produce more than you consume, that is what you do, and in my opinion there is only one way to do that, and that is to do that honestly. If you get things by lying, you produce lies, and you do not consume the stuff you produce, you produce stuff that is intended to injure someone else, you produce poison that you know enough to avoid consuming, and therefore you "earn" your living by using words to commit crimes, you do no earn anything, you steal, you are not honest, you are a criminal, and no amount of spin, doctoring, apologizing, rationalizing, or change, can chance the fact that you target a victim, you produce the stuff that injures the targeted victims, and you plan on inuring the targeted victim, and then you willfully execute that premeditated act - if that is what you do. If you don't do that, then listen, please. An honest productive person earns credit, where credit is due, which isn't easy, and again just like the independently wealthy person who gained his power honestly, you have that power of good credit earned, you represent the full measure of the good faith and credit of the American People, and if the current legal dollar has any value, whatsoever, you represent that value, you make that power to purchase that power to purchase, and you did so by working, producing, being honest, which is being fair, which is doing the right thing, and which is necessary in the work that causes higher standards of living, and lower costs of living. You earn, and that is worth something. You are there, imagining, and you now see Product 1, and Product 2, for sale, and you now have an opportunity to see if this Joe Kelley guy knows what he is talking about, since he did get elected as President, or someone else took that ball and ran with it after Joe Kelley was shot in the head with another magic bullet, and it matters not who carries Product 1, or something similar to it, to you, there it is, and that is the point right now. See the solution offered, see if it works for you. No more ambiguity, no more confusion, no more misunderstanding, no more waiting for the solution, it is there in front of you, you are at the web page, you are at the point of making a decision, and so are all the other honest productive Americans, in their due time, in their places, once Product 1 and Product 2 are ready for you to buy, or ready for you to decide not to buy, along with anyone else who may, or may not have an interest in those two solutions to that one problem. What do you see at the web page, or in the bank, if you want to go to the bank, instead of shopping on-line, for Product 1 and/or Product 2? You don't know. You have no clue. What is the solution to the problem? Did you forget the problem? Legal Criminals steal all the power produced by all The Honest Productive People and they use that stolen power to keep stealing even more. Is that not an obvious problem, even if you don't want to see it? You are sitting at the screen and what is the solution to that problem before you? Make one up yourself, or follow along, and see. You can buy a new home mortgage, legally, from Skype, or PayPal, or whichever bidder wins one of the franchise licenses they are awarded so as to be one of the groups of people who do that paper work, the digital paper work, to offer Product 1 and Product 2 for sale to you, and maintain each account, and do so legally, officially, fairly, equitably, on safe and secure records - in triplicate. You log onto a web site. You submit some information. This isn't rocket science. This is common practice stuff. You then qualify, and you do qualify, because you are another one of the many Honest Productive People and your qualification is honest productivity, and you get a home mortgage loan, for no interest cost to you, and that is Product 1. Do you see how that would work, on a personal level, first? The money is not necessarily dollars, it is a transfer of your future earnings to you, because you will earn it, and you will pay all of what you borrow back to the source, which is you, since you borrow it from yourself, and the reason why PayPal, or Skype, or Google, or any of the franchises want in on this is because they will make money on selling Product 2. They are legally allowed to sell Product 1, which is the free stuff, so as to sell Product 2, which is the money maker for the franchise. How does that work for you, in dollars and cents, first? If you are not independently wealthy: it stand to reason, that you owe interest to someone, for some reason, and the reason may be a dubious one, and if you owe a lot of interest you owe mortgage interest, and if you owe mortgage interest you owe roughly twice the cost of one house for one house. You pay for one house. You pay an extra house worth of interest to someone, for some reason, that you probably don't understand, and who really cares why you had to do that once, once you don't have to do that anymore? You are at the computer. You are offered a no interest home mortgage loan, and you have to ask yourself, punk, this is a 44 magnum, do I want to pay twice for one house, or just once? Call me a conspiracy theorist, a monetary crank, a terrorist, or whatever your conditioned response may be, at first. Get over it. The message is the message. I'm the messenger. I'm not the message. If you want to kill the message, ask why. If you want to kill me, ask why. Why confuse the two? I am not the message. You don't understand why you have to pay twice for one house, or you do, and I don't, and you can go ahead and be right, and how does that work for you, as you pay twice for one house. Product 1 can also have, if I have anything to do with it, the feature of offering a no-interest loan to qualified buyers for the power to purchase a business property along with the power to purchase a home. So, suppose you didn't get Product 1, because you think President Joe Kelley is another socialist, or capitalist, or whatever you don't want, and you know that anyone taking Product 1 will be sending America down to hell quicker, but you see Product 2, and you may think about it some. Suppose that the web page is designed to list the number of total sales of Product 1 and Product 2 like a clock, in real time, each new loan is recorded live. Like this clock: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Each sale of Product 1, a new home mortgage without interest, is another person moving closer to being independently wealthy by a significant measure: roughly half of each monthly mortgage payment, or roughly half of the time of the loan. You can refuse, while the clock shows how many Honest Productive People decide to turn in their old mortgages for new ones. You, go ahead, keep sending roughly twice the cost of a home for one home to someone else, and don't even think a minute about what that money you once had buys, forget about it. But, having refused to participate in that bad, bad, bad, something for nothing, pyramid scheme, socialistic nonsense, home mortgage loan scam, while the numbers count up, you are still at the computer, looking at a new business loan. Sure, keep paying twice what your home is worth, so as to make someone else happy, sending them an entire home's worth of your money, keep it up, on that front, but how about starting your own business? What do you have to lose? What if you default? What if your new business venture is only marginally profitable? Can you afford to pay twice as much as the business property is worth? Wouldn't it be better to cut that expense down by exactly the amount of interest you would have to pay on a business property mortgage, paying your hard earned power to someone who may very well use that power to run you out of business, as they spend the money you sent them on things that make your job even harder, like subsidizing your competition, or who knows what else, kept secret from you? If you default, the business property title, collateral, is sold and you don't get the profits of the sale, of course, and your credit rating suffers, of course, and then you lose your good credit rating, and then you have poor credit, and then, after default, you are thereby charged an interest rate charge as a result, when you seek more credit worthy purchasing power, because that is what you earn, because you default, so think twice, before borrowing - from yourself - you pay the cost, and no longer, if I have my way, will law be used to punish everyone for the wrongdoings of a few bad apples. So you are sitting at the computer, watching the numbers count up, thousands of people are now buying Product 1, it is the first day after the new Independence Day, July 5th 2012, and you note how a few hundred business property loans are purchased, and this is only the Skype web page. You load up the E-Bay web page, and you navigate to the Product 1 and Product 2 page, they have more loans counting up, and you wonder about Product 2, so you navigate to the counter that counts how many Product 2 loans are sold to date, and few are buying product 2, so you think; and what do you think? E-Bay will lose their rear ends on this deal, look at how few loans they are selling for a measly 1 percent profit. Is that what you think? How much does it cost, to E-bay, to maintain a computer program on a network? Does it cost them roughly the cost of one house to process one home loan? Why would they get paid the entire cost of one house just to keep track of one home loan on a computer network? Think about what you have been led to believe, and then think twice, or think again, use your own brain this time. You think, and think, before work, or after work, and either way your thinking is still on work, or the kids, or all that debt, or a pending vacation, but there is the web page, and it is the Product 2 web page, so you wander into the details, to see what people are buying with Product 2 loans, where the borrower has to pay 1% interest on those Product 2 loans. Solar Panels and Electric car loans are prevalent. The 74th person buying a Product 2 loan just counted up on the counter, no name, an anonymous buyer, and the purchase is not listed. Number 75, on the E-Bay Product 2 page is, wooo hooo, look at that, it is Joe Kelley, I knew it, I knew it, that guy is a crook, I don't know why anyone voted for him, see, see, he is cashing in, and he just bought enough Solar Panels to run his house and 2 new Electric cars, a whopping total loan amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars. You may wonder if it is the same Joe Kelley. It may be, but if I'm on that job I'll be busy targeting criminals, and maneuvering them out of office. Some people are buying Modular Green House Vertical Farming Units, whatever that is. Why would anyone want one of those? Where does someone get one of those? What does the web page say about Product 2 loans? Anything that calculates out as a net increase in power, currently, is on the list of things that can be purchased with a Product 2 loan, so long as the net increase is more than 1%. What does that mean? How does a Solar Panel, or Electric Car, or a Modular Green House Vertical Farming Unit calculate out as a net increase in power? What calculation is used? Solar Panels produce enough power in the form of electricity, at current prices of electricity, to pay for another solar panel in less that half of the lifetime of the Solar Panel, it says, and it also says that that is much more than a 1% net increase in power, it says that that is roughly double the increase in power. Buy one, it pays for itself roughly half way before it is no longer generating electricity, and it pays for a second solar panel before it is done generating electricity, based upon very rough, and very conservative calculation. How does that work? What does it say on the web page? Take out the loan, no longer pay an electric bill, before the thing purchased is half worn out the loan is paid off, with interest, and the rest of the life span of the things purchased keep producing power, if the loan is structured to pay off the loan on that specific schedule. You don't believe that Solar Panels are net producers, so you don't buy a Product 2 loan for Solar Panels. Note too, in some States, like California, a home producer can now sell extra electricity back into the grid for profit. Who does buy Product 2 loans, you ask? The numbers count up, and they are counting up in fact. 6 months go by, and you still refuse to participate in that pyramid scheme, socialistic nonsense, or capitalistic nonsense, whatever, it is nonsense. But you look on the web page, again, so as to better know how badly that crap is ruining good ole U.S. of A. You look at another web page, navigating the Product 2 web site, and you see that E-Bay is really trying to sell these Product 2 loans, and you see ideas. One guy claims, and look at his face, what a moron, that he started a taxi service. He cut his home mortgage down by half of the old payment per month, he purchased an old used car lot with the no interest business loan, he purchased enough Solar Panels to run the utilities at home and at work, and he purchased 10 new Electric cars, and 20 extra batteries, and 10 trailers. He says he swaps batteries quickly to keep the taxi cabs rolling, he rents out trailers that have batteries and solar panels to people doing small construction jobs on sites that have no electricity, and he has convinced his relative to start the same business twice the distance away from the car battery range so trips to that town can be made by hauling a spare battery on a trailer. One women claims, and that isn't her in the picture, too pretty, probably a model, that she is working on placing 10 more modules of the Modular Greenhouse Vertical Farming units on part of her big lot in the rural area outside of some town in California, the Mojave Desert it says, and with the savings on the home property mortgage, and the savings on the electric bill having purchased Solar Panels, and the income from selling the food she produces at home, and the savings of not having to buy the lower quality stuff at the store, she can stop working for someone else, at a cut wage, a part time wage, with no benefits, and be at home more often, even if she now has more work to do at home, at least her time and energy produces something of measurable value. And how does that, after 6 months of selling Product 1, and Product 2, solve the problem? What was the problem again? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.garynorth.com/public/8342.cfm Anyone, In very simple terms, it can be known, by enough people to make a difference, that The Federal Reserve Chairman has the legal power to spend an infinite number of dollars, all that one person has to do is add zeros. In 2008 there were this many dollars: 800,000,000,000 That is a large number of dollars. 8 Hundred Billions Dollars. I may not have the right number of zeros. Ben can add 20 zeros, he has that legal license. Ben added one zero in 2008. 1,600,000,000,000 Back to simple terms. Why? What did Ben buy? Follow the money. Whose idea was it to buy something that requires the legal increase of EIGHT HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS. What cost that much? If the world is managing to just barely get by with EIGHT HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS, the entire world has that many dollars to work with, why, why, why, does Ben need another EIGHT HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS to spend? You are being lied to by everyone who has been caught up in the whole Legal Crime Business. Each time someone mentions the word mistake, think, think, think, with your own brain. Honest Productive Americans ->->->->-> Legal Criminals Source of POWER (to purchase) ->->->->->-> POWER over control of purchases How can the source of POWER be made to believe that they have no POWER over what they can produce, or purchase, with their own power? Lies. The whole thing is a farce. Take away the farce, which is inside your brain, and see who actually has the power. Once you see, stop letting your power be stolen, then who has the power? Numbers of powerful victims constitute a very powerful collective power, a very powerful force of stolen power, enough power to cause a whole lot of things to happen, caused by the people who steal all that power. There is the full measure of the power, right in front of your eyes, but your brain can't manage the full measure of it. It would take months to discover all the criminals involved, what they purchased, why they purchased what they purchased, and then do something to stop that crime in progress, or, just do the simplest fix, the easiest fix, just stop giving up your own power, and do so as one. The Honest Productive People ->->->///// - - - - Legal Criminals. Cut the credit card. Stop paying the Legal Criminals at The NATIONAL Level, easily, effortlessly, peacefully, without resort to deceit, without resort to threats of violence, and without executing premeditated aggressive violence upon the innocent. Invent, and then employ, and maintain, competitive legal money. Let those who use dollars have those dollars. They are destroying dollars anyway. They are planning on spending every last measure of value and leaving the victims an empty bag, anyway, so why settle for that destination on that well worn dictatorial path? Why settle for lower standards of living and higher costs of living forced upon The Honest Productive People by the Legal Criminals through a well managed, elaborate, perpetuating, fraud? Why not invent, employ, and maintain a competitive legal money whereby The Honest Productive People refuse to allow their power over their power to be stolen, and thereby The Honest Productive People do what they do best, which is to increase the standard of living and lower the cost of living through competitive honest productive work? Why is there a need to decide, at all? What magic has your brain tied up in the mire of falsehood? The Legal Criminals are not making mistakes. How can you not see that as a fact? You are led to believe that there are no options. You are led to believe that only the authorities can fix the problems they keep trying to fix. What kind of nonsense are you begging for, demanding, settling for, allowing, and being victim to, voluntarily? Power over your thinking is abdicated by you as the lies you allow yourself to believe continue to work that destructive way. It is past time to stop that nonsense inside your brain. Work today. Do your work today. Get some good sleep tonight. Wake up knowing better. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/34770 "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." — Henry Ford |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, Listening to Alex Jones. I heard Alex say that Ron Paul says that getting out of the dollar system would take decades. Please see how false that claim must be if you use your own brain to figure out how easy it can be to simply stop using dollars and start using a competitive currency. Whose economy will collapse? A. People whose income increases as a function of banking interest. B. People whose income increases as a function of producing more than consumption. Can you understand how group A has a vested interest in maintaining the dollar monopoly? When they claim that there will be a collapse, who are they concerned about, and in whose interest do they make that claim? People whose income increases as a function of banking interest have an involuntary association operating, whereby the victims must transfer the power that the victims produced to the legal criminals that run, and maintain, the one, monopoly, cartel, legal money extortion racket, and their capacity to increase their income, at the expense of the producers of power, can be destroyed by competition at home, or their capacity to increase their income, at the expense of the producers of power, can be destroyed by foreign competition. Here Alex and Webster speak about China, Russia, and other competitors. Those are foreign competitors. Don't forget about two groups, keep those two groups in mind: A. People whose income increases as a function of banking interest. B. People whose income increases as a function of producing more than consumption. People whose income increases as a function of monopoly banking interest at home, facing foreign competition, can have their entire store of wealth vanish overnight, if they do not transfer their power from the devalued monopoly dollar to the new World Reserve Currency Winner of the World Money Competition. See that risk clearly. People whose income increases as a function of monopoly banking interest cannot increase their income when a competitor wins, and worse, the power to purchase can vanish when a competitor takes over control of the monopoly. What is missing from that picture? Competition at home is missing from that picture. Each Legal Crime ring in each Nation State (involuntary association) have their own, home grown, monopoly money extortion racket, so each Nation State can cause boom and bust in each Nation State, and that is only possible because each Nation State enforces a single money that must be earned by all the people who produce earnings, so as to pay taxes with that one money. Each Nation State, run by Legal Criminals, can make money scarce, then make money abundant, then make money scarce, then make money abundant, and in doing so the power flows from those who produce power, in that Nation State, to the Legal Criminals who have exclusive control over the one money supply, in that Nation State. Those who are increasing their income by working those systems, in those Nation States, can gain a lot of power, for doing nothing more than working the system, producing nothing themselves, but they have a very serious risk, if they do not keep their power supply denominated in the highest quality (most powerful) currency, at the highest interest (most scarce), if they fail to change from dollars at the right time, they will be left holding an empty bag, they will be too late, their power will be denominated in dollars, and no one will buy those dollar denominated accounts, not at the high price, because the price drops, because the dollar is crashed on purpose, and because very few people have the accurate schedule that informs those few people when to move and when to not move, power, from one money, to another money. What is missing? The narrative being told to you, including the narrative that it would take decades to convert to a better money, is a story, a lie, and if the person reporting the lie is ignorant of the lie, then it is not a willful lie, from that person, that person merely parrots the lie, unknowingly, failing to realize the truth. If the lie is repeated knowingly, think, and ask, why, and ask: In whose interest is it to repeat that lie? If there is competition in legal money markets at home, within a Democratic Federated Republican experimental form of government, the missing thing you are not being told, if that is allowed to happen, the collapse only happens to those people who refuse to switch, today, now, to the better money. What is better money? Think back to the two groups: A. People whose income increases as a function of banking interest. B. People whose income increases as a function of producing more than consumption. Who asks the question? Who asks which is the better money? You don't. You are not allowed to even ask. You think I'm nuts? http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html AMENDMENT XIV The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. The missing element, missing on purpose, is a competitive money; but what makes a money competitive? A. It will be higher in quality. B. It will be lower in cost. You can't even ask. You haven't even asked. Ask. Do you want a money that is worthless? Do you want a money that is costly? If you don't even ask, you will get what you deserve. So, assume, know, imagine, conceive, play out, reason out, and understand what will happen, and how fast what will happen will happen, when it is legal for anyone to choose a better money. Why would it ever take decades to make a simple choice as the choice between worthless, costly, money, and powerful, costless, money. You can't even conceive of powerful, costless, money, therefore you won't get it. How simple can it get? How about this angle: There are two types of money: A. Fraudulent (Money that is enforced by a few powerful people upon the man victims) B. Not A If the only money used by most of the productive people is fraudulent, there can still be a division among that fraudulent money, such as a number of competitive fraudulent money suppliers, but each one is still fraudulent. A. Fraudulent Money 1A. The Dollar 2A. The Euro 3A. The next World Reserve Currency (no longer The Dollar Hegemony since The Dollar Hegemony is being destroyed on schedule) If you are among the people whose earnings are made by way of deceit, by way of threats of violence, and by way of acts of horrible violence, and you have lots, and lots, and lots, of purchasing power denominated in dollars, you are in either one of two groups: I. Those who have the inside information concerning when to get out of the dollar and when to get in the new World Reserve Currency Extortion Racket Money. II. Those who are guessing What is missing? III. Honest Productive People (A.K.A. ready victims) Without group III.: there is no power in any of those fraudulent moneys, none. When group III., The Honest Productive People, regain control over their own money, the Legal Criminals will eat each other, or they will have to transfer their worthless money into the best competitive money power. You, almost all of you, don't have a clue, have no understanding of money, no idea, no concept, no measure of it, other than the fraudulent, monopoly, criminal, and legal crime, money. Why? Why do you think your standard of living is decreasing while your cost of living increases? You don't know. You don't even know why you don't know, why you don't know what high quality and low cost, competitive, money is, in fact. You don't know why your standard of living is decreasing while your cost of living increases, despite working more, despite working more efficiently, despite working more competitively, despite working with many new work saving devices, despite having less expensive power to do work for you, and despite investing much of your earnings on investments that intend to increase your standard of living, and investments that intend to lower your costs of living, despite all that, your standard of living decreases, while your cost of living increase, and you don't know why. You don't know what high quality and low cost, competitive, money is, in fact. Even if you did know what was, in fact, high quality, and low cost, money, you can't get it, so they say, because it would take decades to get it, so forget about it. Obey, that is your purpose in life. There will be a collapse, as power flows to the few, from their end, it isn't a collapse, yet who keeps claiming that it is a collapse? Who claims that there is no way out, there will be a collapse? In whose interest is it to make sure that no other option is ever known by anyone? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
08-08-2011, Listening to Nomi Prinz on the Alex Jones broadcast. She says: "There is no way out." In whose interest is it to invent, produce, and then maintain a path by which many people will continue transferring all power created by them to a very few people who invent, produce, and maintain that path? The answer is self evident. Please consider the obvious solution. Invent, produce, and maintain a competitive path, a path that no longer follows the path that is invented, produced, and maintained by the few people who receive all the power produced by the victims who produce power. If you have none, borrow one. Here is one: Product 1 and Product 2; whereby Product 1 is a legal mortgage loan at no interest charged to qualified borrowers, for home, or business, and Product 2 is a 1% interest loan used exclusively for the invention, production, and use of power producing products, whereby the product produces a net increase in power that is above a 1% increase in power. Many things can produce 100% increase in power. You may not understand how Product 1 and Product 2 work as one, possible, invention, production, and maintained path, that is no longer the path that transfers all power from those who create power to those who steal it. Nomi Prinz: "There is no way out." Really? I hear Alex Jones ask: "What are your solutions?" I'm on the edge of my seat. "Will to break up the banks." "Awareness on the part of..." Next up is Dr. Steve Pieczenik, and although Nomi Prinz did identify a cause of the problem, which is lack of will, and which is ignorance concerning the problem, she did not invent, produce, and maintain an example of a solution, which leaves in place The Dollar Hegemony. Why is it not abundantly clear that the thing that connects the victims to the criminals is that legal dollar unit of money, that exact denomination of crime in progress? Cut that and power no longer flows to the Legal Criminals, but, and this is important, the Legal Criminals are cutting that link, but they are creating a replacement, and the replacement will be invented, produced, and maintained so as to increase their interests, their power, their advantage, their leverage, their ability, their power, their capacity, to steal from those who produce, and meanwhile, while the connection is cut, and before the new connection is in place, The Honest Productive People will be disconnected from each other, and therefore productivity will be rendered powerless, because connectivity is an essential power required in modern productive social networks, information has to flow (accurate information, not lies, frauds, behavioral modification, response conditioning, false propaganda, brain washing), physical matter has to flow (productive matter, not bombs, viruses, missiles, troops, etc.), and if Trade (productive trade) does not flow, troops will flow, as the criminals eat each other. So, where was the message that offered another road, a step on the other road, not a message that merely pointed out the danger? 1. Know the danger (while stepping, even running, even accelerating, even increasing the rate of acceleration, even falling, even rocketing down, the false, destructive path) 2. Invent, produce, and maintain the power of will to get off that path 3. No step onto the path traveled once the destructive path is no longer being followed. Where is the first step? Nomi Prinz: "There is no way out." If you don't invent one, there is no way out. If you don't produce one, there is no way out. If you don't maintain one, the way out won't last. Product 1 and Product 2 are ways out, obvious ways out, and that way out does not resort to deceit, does not resort to threats of violence, and does not resort to acts of horrible, terrifying, aggressive, violence upon innocent victims. Listening to Dr. Steve Pieczenik - looking for solutions. I hear a problem: "Terrorism" OK, what is the solution to "Terrorism"? Please note that under Sharia Law the act of enforcing banking interest is not tolerated, that constitutes a direct competitive force working to force interest rates down. Note that whenever you decide to explain Islamophobia. What I gain from the message offered by Dr. Steve Pieczenik is what I call a front. If I am elected President, I will have to know where the most dangerous destructive powers are, and how those most dangerous destructive powers will be overpowered. The Honest Productive People are weakened by the Legal Criminals running the Monopoly Money Extortion Racket, and that is one Front, a power struggle, and there is an easy fix, and that battle is won, easily. The power struggle explained by Dr. Steve Pieczenik, on the other hand, on another front, involves a similar power struggle, whereby the true power of the U.S. Military is the Honest Productive People within the Military, and if anyone, anywhere, has any doubt concerning exactly what is, or is not, an Honest Productive Military Person, then, please consider reading the following book: http://www.amazon.com/Boyd-Fighter-Pilot-Who-Changed/dp/0316881465 To win that power struggle, between the Honest Productive Military People (who produce an effective defense of Liberty) and the Legal Criminals, to win that battle: the act of rewarding criminals, and simultaneously punishing Honest Productive Military People, will be reversed. How can that be made to happen? Follow the money. Those who have grown impossibly wealthy in the Military, obviously, they have been rewarded for doing something. The Military has be abused in the work of conducting aggressive wars for profit, so as to eliminate all competition, and the targets have obviously been competitors in the oil business, and the oil business has been obviously, measurably, backing The Dollar Hegemony, and therefore those paper trails, as those rewards have been flowing from the inventors, producers, and maintainers of the legal dollar unit of monopoly currency, will be investigated, and if found guilty of the extreme crime of conducting aggressive wars for profit, they will be charged, and they will be judged, and those who blow the whistle on them, will be promoted, and rewarded, and those who produce internal defense, blowing the whistle, will be given the power they need to employ the military as a defensive force, within The Military, as well as all foreign enemies, and as far as I am concerned, The Military has no business targeting any no Military person at home, but they must police themselves. Stop feeding The Legal Criminals in The U.S. Military, and they will eat each other, or they will have to get productive jobs outside The U.S. Military, and who will pay them to lie? You? Begin exposing the war profiteers within the Military by promoting, and empowering the whistle blowers, and in that way The Military Power will return to an effective defensive force, instead of being abused as an effective (marginally) offensive force, for profit, of a few, at the expense of many innocent victims, foreign, and domestic. Read the book linked, know what is an effective Military Person, and know that there are Honest Productive People in The U.S. Military, the bar has been set, the bar is reset by current Honest Productive People in the Military, and promoting them, and rewarding them, for being Honest Productive People, by giving them license, and giving them power, to police their own ranks, while, at the same time, cutting the flow of power to the Legal Criminals within The U.S. Military, both civilian and Military People alike, cutting the rewards flowing to the Legal Criminals, will win that power struggle on that Military Front, at home. The Troops will no longer be used as cannon fodder sent on aggressive wars for profit, abused by Legal Criminals, as The Legal Criminals, inside or outside of The U.S. Military, reach for their goals of destroying all competition, where ever, and when ever competition arises - such as oil competition, and banking competition. That power flow will be stopped, in that way, and it may not be as easy as stopping the money fraud business, but having one goal accomplished, on one front, will help reverse the power flowing the wrong way on the other front. The U.S. Military most certainly does need our help, and without our help they cannot defend us. I think that it is vitally important to understand the full measure of a Military Force, what it is, why it is necessary, and what can happen when it is corrupted by Legal Criminals; how it can be a turned from a defensive force to an aggressive force, how it can become a force that no longer defends Liberty, how it can become a force that enforces Legal Crime. If anyone, anywhere, needs some measurable good news, it seems to me, the fact that The U.S. Military is not yet overtly employed in the work of destroying competition (to the Legal Criminals) at home - such as the Whiskey Rebellion, Civil War, Kent State, or the Waco examples - is a source of good news, when The U.S. Military does get the order to attack Honest Productive People at home, all is lost, unless that order is disobeyed. Alex has moved the message to The Kennedy Assassination. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, I had to go and do some work, so I did not edit my last entry on the subject of sides. Who is a victim? Who is a legal criminal? Who is completely disconnected from either victims or legal criminals? The full measure of the connection between the legal criminals and the victims may not be as obvious as the National Debt Clock, and the actual names, addresses, and phone numbers of the legal criminals many not all be well recorded in the paper work, and digital records, such as those records published as Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, and therefore it may be very difficult to know the full measure of the connection between the legal criminals and the victims, unless there is an another angle by which the person who wants to know the full measure of that connection can invent, and then employ, so as to see the full measure of the connection between the legal criminals and the victims, from that new angle of view. I have invented such a method, and you can use my method, or you can use any other method invented by anyone else, or you can ignore the entire question, so long as you can still ignore it, and your life time may run out before you can no longer afford to ignore that connection between the victims and the legal criminals, so it matters not to you, in that respect, since you will always be able to afford not to know the facts concerning the full measure of the connection between the victims and the legal criminals. My invention, or anyone else's invention, produces an obvious path that can be traveled by anyone who decides to get off the victim connection to the legal criminals path, and from that point, once on that new path, the full measure of the connection between the victims and the legal criminals can be seen, as if the person is now a foreign observer, a disinterested third party, analogous to an explorer finding a new civilization whereby the explorer begins to view the strange and never before seen relationships that occur in this new, foreign, civilization, as the explorer views the new civilization from a different viewpoint, a viewpoint that isn't from within the newly discovered civilization. In other words: the full measure of the victim connection to the legal criminals is viewable from a victims viewpoint, and the same connection is viewable from a legal criminals viewpoint, and then, if one exists, the connection can be seen from a disconnected viewpoint, but only if the optional viewpoint is exactly disconnected, not just imagined, not just a fantasy, the viewpoint can be made real, as the viewpoint does begin to work from a new place, whereby the connection to the victims is no longer valid, and once the connection to the legal criminals is no longer valid, and from that new place the viewer views the distant connection. The act of viewing, from the separate place, constitutes a connection. The capacity to disconnect, completely, is understandable in analogy, and by that use of your mind you can begin to build that place where you can go so as to disconnect from that very destructive social network. You won't know the full measure of the destructive power of the connection between victims and legal criminals until such time as you are disconnected from it, completely, and then, you connect to it again, from a safe place, and from that safe place your only connection to the victim and legal criminal connection is analogous to a person reading a book, or a person listening to a radio broadcast, or a person viewing a documentary, and the subject of the book, or radio broadcast, or documentary is another world, another time, another universe, something that has nothing to do with your world, nothing to do with your time, and something that only exists in your universe as that book, or that radio broadcast, or that documentary, since you are completely disconnected from that place, that time, in all forms other than that one portal of perception. See it, and be warned, do not go there, that is a road to ultimate doom. If you are on it, if you are on that road to ultimate doom, you can't see it, you don't know the full measure of it, because, obviously, if you did know the truth, if you did know the full measure of it, your next thought, and then your next action, would be to get off that path immediately. How do you get off that path, without a direction off that path, what would be the first thought, and the first step, off that path if you did somehow manage to realize the full measure of the impending doom on that path? Invent a step whereby you step off that path and your step steps onto a path that completely disconnects from that connection between victims and legal criminals. If you can't invent one yet, look for inventions invented by other people who have managed to disconnect from that legal criminal to victim connection, which is a road leading to ultimate doom. I offer my own invention, in Product 1 and Product 2. My invention is derived from the following invention: http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf There is a rich, but well censored, history behind that invention, as it was used, and as it succeeded during it's use. That invention is connected to the following modern version: http://www.ithacahours.org/ There are similar inventions in the following connections: http://utopianist.com/2011/01/stimulus-writ-small-tiny-california-town-prints-its-own-currency/ http://www.umungu.com/scrip.htm All of those inventions connect you to a step off the connection between the victims and the legal criminals, and they do so measurably, but all of those inventions constitute a cost to you, a road block as you travel down your path, and as you encounter those road blocks you are forced to deal with them, and you are inspired to discard them, to avoid them, to step around them, to ignore them, to rush past them, so to return quickly back to your path. If you are using dollars you are connected to the legal criminals who are connected to the victims, and you are in that social network, and you are on that path, and that path is designed to proceed to a specific goal, and that specific goal is designed to move power from the honest productive people who produced economic power, and that power is designed to be moved to the legal criminals, and there are warnings in history similar to this warning I am offering to you right now. Invent, produce, and maintain a path that is no longer on that legal crime path. That is my warning to you. Here is a historical record of a similar warning, as I try desperately to balance on the shoulders of giants: http://freethinker.typepad.com/the_free_thinker/2007/09/give-unto-caesa.html "Give Unto Caesar What is Caesar's and Unto God What is God's" I took time to read some of the text in that link. You may want a sound bite. My version of a sound bit is to say that either an association will be voluntary, equitable, and mutually beneficial, having no employment of deceit, no employment of threats of violence, and no employment of premeditated targeting of innocent victims, or, the association will be criminal, by that specific measure. There is no third option. Either an association will be voluntary or it will be involuntary, and the criminals want you to believe otherwise, they want you to believe that there is no such discrimination, you have to hire an authority to provide the full measure of an association, that may, or may not be involuntary, or voluntary, once they let you know if it is, or is not voluntary, or involuntary. You can use your own brain, and you can know, is the association voluntary, or is it "an offer that can't be refused"? Jesus, in that statement about "give unto Caesar What is Caesar's", to me, amounts to a warning, and the warning is exactly the same warning I'm telling you right now. If you connect to the connection between victims and legal criminals, you will be victim or criminal, so don't do it, do not connect, do not accept the connection, even if the connection is a gold coin. This is not as complicated as it seems. Think again in terms of the actual factual measure of the connection that connects the victims to the legal criminals, harken back to the actual measure of that connection that is produced by the legal criminals, the modern day Caesars, look at it; look at, for example, The National Debt Clock. The connection is denominated in dollars. The connection is a connection made by legal criminals as they invent, produced, and maintain the connection with dollars. That is the modern day connection. Dollars connect the victims to the legal criminals. If you accept dollars, you accept the connection. If you do not accept dollars, if you "give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's", you can disconnect, and see that that advice by Jesus is the same advice I am offering: don't participate, the gold coin belonging to the modern day Caesars moves near you, you refuse to accept it, pull away, think of it as if you are superman and it is kryptonite, no thanks, give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, is the same thing as saying "If they want to be victims and legal criminals: let them, what does that have to do with me?" You can't. You can't disconnect from the dollar, you can't disconnect from the victims and the legal criminals, doing so will amount to either starvation or being gang raped in prison. That is a false set of choices. A false set of choices is a destructive, powerless, situation that is missing a vital option. A false set of choices is ignorance of, an inability to see, a higher quality and lower cost choice. A false set of choices amounts to, measures up as, blind obedience to falsehood. It is past time to declare war on falsehood. Opt out. What is needed is an obvious alternative path. A. Starve for lack of employment, lack of pay, lack of profit, lack of production, lack of economic power, lack of money, as you refuse to be part of the legal crime business, as you refuse to be connected to the victims and the legal criminals, as you refuse to have anything to do with dollars, you realize that dollars connect you, as a victim, or as an accessory to crime, to the legal criminals who produce dollars, the modern day Caesars. Starvation is not a good choice, but think about where you are going on this path while you stay on this path. B. Suffer punishment for your efforts to disconnect from the legal criminals and their victims since taxes must be paid in dollars, and failure to have dollars to pay taxes will cause the modern day Caesars to send tax collectors who will take the debt from your hide, one way or another, you will be crucified for doing the right, moral, thing. Punishment is not a good choice, but think about where you are going on this path that you are on, again. C. Since you can't beat them, you have to join them, so use the dollar as a means by which you can be less of a victim, and you can be more of a criminal, your account grows at the expense of the victims, instead of your dollar denominated account reaching never before known measures of your debt, your victimization, at the hands of the modern day Caesars. This is your only option, among the false choices, and you take it, and if you can follow all the rules, and if you can get some of the inside information, and if you are very lucky, or very good (at victimizing other people), you can increase your account, at the expense of those who can't, for as long as you can, while this is your only option, kill or be killed, eat them, before they eat you, resort to deceit, resort to threats of violence, and resort to aggressive violence upon targeted innocent victims, as needed, on this path, the only path, so far. If you cant see a better option, does that mean that no such thing exists? If you don't admit to being on the Long Black Train heading to Doom Day, does that mean that you are not on that train? If someone offers one, or even many, alternative paths, will you rush to avoid knowing it, and at that point in time and place, during your life time, you will be your own judge, and you will sentence yourself to whatever costs you will bear as a result of that choice, and no amount of belief, otherwise, will change that fact. Once you are offered an alternative, and you refuse it, you are no longer innocent, you are either a willing, ready, volunteer for victimization, or you are a willful, premeditated, fellow legal criminal, and that is the legacy of your lifetime from then on. If you say that the invention I offer is not workable, yet you have no alternative, you have no competitive, higher quality, and lower cost invention of your own, you are choosing nothing instead of something that you claim to be unworkable. You choose no alternative path, having none, and refusing one that is offered to you. You choose to remain connected to the victims and the legal criminals, you do so willfully, your actions are premeditated, you judge yourself, by your actions, you define yourself as a legal criminal, you cannot be a victim, you decide to be injured if you are injured, and you decide to employ legal crime as your vocation. You live by the aggressive, criminal, sword, and even if you say that you do deserve not to die by the same criminal, aggressive sword, when the day arrives, the moment arrives, you will be there, on that day, at that moment, because you choose to go down that path. When you reap what you sow, that is what you have decided to do, from here on. May God have mercy upon your soul, your fellow legal criminals won't. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-exploding/ Honest Productive Americans, The tipping point spoken of by Alex Jones is one perspective, and many people are learning to share that perspective, and many people have already arrived at that one perspective some time ago. Please see five things: Do you know the meaning of the word meme? 1. Meme http://thedailymeme.com/what-is-a-meme/ “a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of imitation,” 2. The 100th Monkey. http://www.wowzone.com/monkey.htm Thus, when a certain critical number achieves an awareness, this new awareness may be communicated from mind to mind. 3. Jelly Bean Jar Test http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/excerpt.html A classic demonstration of group intelligence is the jelly-beans-in-the-jar experiment, in which invariably the group's estimate is superior to the vast majority of the individual guesses. When finance professor Jack Treynor ran the experiment in his class with a jar that held 850 beans, the group estimate was 871. Only one of the fifty-six people in the class made a better guess. 4. Assassination Politics http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm A few months ago, I had a truly and quite literally "revolutionary" idea, and I jokingly called it "Assassination Politics": I speculated on the question of whether an organization could be set up to legally announce that it would be awarding a cash prize to somebody who correctly "predicted" the death of one of a list of violators of rights, usually either government employees, officeholders, or appointees. It could ask for anonymous contributions from the public, and individuals would be able send those contributions using digital cash. 5. Mob Rule aka Democracy http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutional-Convention/dp/1410203638 The members of the convention from the States, came there under different powers; the greatest number, I believe, under powers nearly the same as those of the delegates of this State. Some came to the convention under the former appointment, authorizing the meeting of delegates merely to regulate trade. Those of the Delaware were expressly instructed to agree to no system, which should take away from the States that equality of suffrage secured by the original articles of confederation. Before I arrived, a number of rules had been adopted to regulate the proceedings of the convention, by one of which was to affect the whole Union. By another, the doors were to be shut, and the whole proceedings were to be kept secret; and so far did this rule extend, that we were thereby prevented from corresponding with gentlemen in the different States upon the subjects under our discussion; a circumstance, Sir, which, I confess, I greatly regretted. I had no idea, that all the wisdom, integrity, and virtue of this State, of of the others, were centered in the convention. I wished to have corresponded freely and confidentially with eminent political characters in my own and other States; not implicitly to be dictated to by them, but to give their sentiments due weight and consideration. So extremely solicitous were they, that their proceedings should not transpire, that the members were prohibited even from taking copies of resolutions, on which the convention were deliberating, or extracts of any kind from the journals, without formally moving for, and obtaining permission, by vote of the convention for that purpose. But, Sir, it was to no purpose that the futility of their objections were shown, when driven from the pretense, that the equality of suffrage had been originally agreed to on principles of expediency and necessity; the representatives of the large States persisting in a declaration, that they would never agree to admit the smaller States to an equality of suffrage. In answer to this, they were informed, and informed in terms that most strong, and energetic that could possibly be used, that we never would agree to a system giving them the undue influence and superiority they proposed. That we would risk every possible consequence. That from anarchy and confusion, order might arise. That slavery was the worst that could ensue, and we considered the system proposed to be the most complete, most abject system of slavery that the wit of man ever devised, under pretense of forming a government for free States. That we never would submit tamely and servilely, to a present certain evil, in dread of a future, which might be imaginary; that we were sensible the eyes of our country and the world were upon us. That we would not labor under the imputation of being unwilling to form a strong and energetic federal government; but we would publish the system which we approved, and also that which we opposed, and leave it to our country, and the world at large, to judge between us, who best understood the rights of free men and free States,ans who best advocated them; and to the same tribunal we could submit, who ought to be answerable for all the consequences, which might arise to the Union from the convention breaking up, without proposing any system to their constituents. During this debate we were threatened, that if we did not agree to the system propose, we never should have an opportunity of meeting in convention to deliberate on another, and this was frequently urged. In answer, we called upon them to show what was to prevent it, and from what quarter was our danger to proceed; was it from a foreign enemy? Our distance from Europe, and the political situation of that country, left us but little to fear. Was there any ambitious State or States, who, in violation of every sacred obligation, was preparing to enslave the other States, and raise itself to consequence on the ruin of the others? Or was there any such ambitious individual? We did not apprehend it to be the case; but suppose it to be true, it rendered it the more necessary, that we should sacredly guard against a system, which might enable all those ambitious views to be carried into effect, even under the sanction of the constitution and government. In fine, Sir, all those threats were treated with contempt, and they were told, that we apprehended but one reason to prevent the States meeting again in convention; that, when they discovered the part this convention had acted, and how much its members were abusing the trust reposed in them, the States would never trust another convention. The last link intends to point the reader to a fraud that occurred some time ago, and the idea here is to ask for sound judgement. Do facts require your permission to exist? Does it matter how many people know the facts? How few are needed to cause a fraud to be effective? At what point are the victims of fraud clued in, and once that point is reached can it be measurably known that the fraud no longer works? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.sovereignman.com/expat/betting-on-people-who-will-kick-assWhy I’m betting on people who will kick ass and take names Honest Productive Americans, Bait and switch is at play when a person claims that Gold is Honest money, and I can explain. Money has no capacity to be honest. Money has no capacity to lie. Money can be an accurate account. Money can be a fraudulent account. The Bait is money. The Switch is the actual people who invent, produce, and then maintain the money. See? Gold is honest money. Ok, I get the bait, thanks, let's, by all means, use gold as money. Let US do that, thank you very much, I really like Honest money. "We" used gold, for awhile, because "it" is honest money. What happens if the producers of the legal gold money supply remove as much of the supply of gold from circulation because they can, because they have the power to do so, and suppose you are keen, and you find out what they are doing, while they are doing it, instead of you finding out too late? Did gold magically, randomly, get up and walk itself out of circulation and do so secretively, quietly, and so as not to alert everyone all at once? Did the producers of gold tell everyone in advance, voluntarily, announcing by all means within their power to do so, no matter the cost of doing so, warning everyone, well in advance, of their honest plan to honestly remove most of the honest gold out of circulation, and did those honest Gold Bugs explain honestly why they would hatch that plan to remove as much of the one and only legal currency they can remove out of circulation, warning everyone, before executing that plan? The answer is no, because those types of plans don't work if everyone knows about them, they work best if very few people know about them, in advance, so as to clue the insiders in on when to sell at the top price and when to buy at the bottom price as the manipulations of supply cause booms and busts, on purpose, on schedule, for profit, at the expense of the victims, or just for fun. Gold can't be honest. Gold can't be dishonest. People who willfully plan on producing deception are dishonest as they define dishonesty, by those decision, with those plans to produce deception and while they execute those plans to follow through with deception upon their targeted victims. Bait: Gold Switch: People manipulating gold once gold is the only legal money. Two groups: A. Those who favor competition as a force that will or will not allow gold to become the highest quality money at the lowest cost. B. Those who favor a legally enforced single money, gold or anything, so long as it is the only money allowed by law. Same two groups: A. Those in favor of voluntary association, and therefore in favor of defense against involuntary association - without which there is more involuntary association by default. B. Those in favor of involuntary association, typically claiming, by willful deceit, or by willful ignorance, or just following the herd, that involuntary associations are necessary, because without involuntary associations forced on us by us there would be involuntary associations forced on us by them. On to quotes from the article: It’s easy to be pessimistic on a day like today. Forty years ago on this very day, Richard Nixon put a bullet into George Washington’s face, cancelling the direct convertibility of dollars into gold and once and for all ending any hope of an honest money system. Systems cannot be honest. I don't know who can claim to own the patent on that invention, but clearly this author is parroting it, or reinventing it, and it is false. A system, or a gun, or a pointed stick, or a lie, can't be honest. People in command of the power to decide can decide to communicate known facts or decide an opposite path, to fail to communicate know facts, or to communicate known falsehoods, and people are, by that power to decide, and by those decisions, either honest, in each case, or dishonest in each case. A lie, or a choice to be dishonest, can be defensive. Honest Criminal calling on the phone: "Hi, I'm stopping by later and when I get there you had better be ready for me, get all your young women ready for me to rape, have them bathed, naked, and ready, and get all the money you have ready for me to steal, and don't even think about defending yourself with any weapons of any kind, do not even question my schedule, I will be there at 9 o'clock, you will have everything ready for me then." Dishonest Targeted Criminal; "Yes sir, everything will be ready as you command, on time." Lies can be as powerful for the intended victims as they are for the criminals, so even lies are not necessarily immoral, or bad, just as guns, or pointed sticks, or Louisville Sluggers, are not necessarily bad, by default, where the thing is bad, which is false, as the thing is inert, the thing is a tool, the thing is separate from the human being who uses the thing willfully. The thing has no will. Why would someone ever willfully confused the thing with the person using the thing? You may have to guess, few people confess. Actions confess motive, in cases where the person planning and executing the act are not willing to confess their true motives. It’s easy to be pessimistic on a day like today. Forty years ago on this very day, Richard Nixon put a bullet into George Washington’s face, cancelling the direct convertibility of dollars into gold and once and for all ending any hope of an honest money system. Money systems cannot be honest. Money systems can be accurate. Why ask for something that can't exist, when you can invent, produce, and maintain something that can exist? Why go down a false path, when a true path is much less costly, and a much higher quality path? Back to the article. Over the past four decades, the dollar has fallen 98% against the price of gold. Politicians and central bankers pretend that inflation is not a concern, but the rising cost of living around the world has prompted people to such extremes that they’re willing to light themselves on fire to protest government bungling. In simple terms: Inflation is a measure of the failure to use the power that is available in the work that results in more power being produced. Even a shrinking supply of money can't keep up with an even faster reduction in the supply of things to trade for money. Inflation can occur while the money supply is being cut in half, if the supply of things to trade for money are reduced by 90%. Money = 1000 today while things to trade for money = 1000 today. 1 thing costs 1 dollar today. Money = 500 tomorrow (the supply of money is cut in half overnight) while things to trade for money = 100 tomorrow (reduced by 90%, war for example). 1 thing costs 5 dollars tomorrow. In one word: Malinvestment Who measures the value of an investment, and by what standard is that value measured? Group A = investment is accomplished by way of destruction, so long as power continues to flow to Group A from Group B Group B = investment is accomplished by using available power in the work necessary to increase available power - which includes the cost of avoiding Group A Group A may appraise the use of available power in the work of destroying things, like destroying all competition where ever, and when ever, competition arises, as a solid investment, and the result of that use of that power is less total power, while, not by coincidence, the lower total quantity of power is transferred to Group A the Legal Criminals, from Group B the Honest Productive People. Total power declines, but power still transfers from those who make it to those who steal it, and the rate of transfer increases, and the rate of increase of transfer increases, while Group A uses power to destroy things, such as using power stolen to destroy all competition, and by employing a particularly effective deception whereby Group B sends power to Group A in the effort to disconnect Group B from Group A, and that power is then used to accomplish the opposite goal - which is not news. Not news: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Note the words in the Article linked at the top of the page - please: Over the past four decades, the dollar has fallen 98% against the price of gold. Politicians and central bankers pretend that inflation is not a concern, but the rising cost of living around the world has prompted people to such extremes that they’re willing to light themselves on fire to protest government bungling. "bungling" That is more falsehood. Why travel down a false path, that is very costly, and very low quality, when a true path is much higher in quality, and much lower in cost? The ignorant, and stupid, victims, are driven down the false path. The legal criminals are not on that path. They are on the true path, they are on the legal crime path, but they are not "bungling", they are using the power they steal to gain more power, and to do so they have to use the power they steal to destroy things, resulting in a net loss of power, and who pays the bills? Who cashes the checks, as the steadily shrinking supplies of power are transferred to the legal criminals, as they tell the victims that "we are broke"? Who pays the bills? Who is the stupid one? Blame me, if it works for you, and I'll know your true color. Either you desire to be a victim too, or you somehow manage to be one of the legal criminals, and I won't hold my breath for a confession, blaming me is good enough of a confession. Note the words: "government bungling" A government, or a system, or money, or a gun, or a pointed stick, can't bungle. Why would anyone confuse the thing with the person using the thing? What would be the point of willfully traveling down a false path? Whose idea is it to race to the bottom, while it is much easier to go the other way? Back to the article: I’m eager to invest. I don't know who is reading this article as I do, and what goes on in their minds. In my mind I see the measure of a legally enforced scarcity of legal money competition; whereupon a select few powerful people gain the legal license to transfer power from producers of power and that power is then transferred to a select few who produce monetary products, and that causes one competitor to be more powerful than another competitor by that exact measure, at least that exact measure. Monetary competitor A, by that exact measure, pays "taxes", and those "taxes" are then sent to monetary competitor B, and in so doing: monetary competitor B gains power, at the expense of, monetary competitor A. Once that happens a competitor has to ask permission to compete, failing to gain license, by asking permission, is exclusion from the club of competitors, you are written off, you can't compete, and the price charged to the competitor seeking admission into the club, is the tax, the price of admission, the tax is then transferred to the competition, by way of subsidy, so that exact transfer of power causes the competitor seeking admission to start at a disadvantage, and that subsidy causes the established competitors to gain advantage by that exact measure. Why does a new competitor have to seek "investment capital", why can't a new competitor print their own start up capital, and the answer is, they can, and they do, and some of those people using that business model are able to bypass the "price of admission" by that method, but they have to specialize in that business, in addition to whatever other specialty they offer in competition. Examples: One of our students, Philipe from Brazil, came up with a great idea to address a real need in his home country: elderly care. Brazil’s rapidly growing middle class now has the disposable income to provide better in-home care to its elderly parents, and he devised an elegant solution that is just screaming to be deployed. I’m eager to invest. A person seeks to begin working as a competitor in the business of elderly care, which is a specialty, someone who can specialize in providing higher quality, and lower cost, care for the elderly, and as such, the customers will choose his higher quality care, at a lower cost, over someone who offers lower quality, and higher cost, elderly care. Why can't that person start offering a competitive specialty right away? That person specializes in elderly care, and that person does not specialize in inventing, producing, and maintaining a competitive legal monetary product. So that person, failing to specialize in two things simultaneously, seeks to pay for someone who does specialize in inventing, producing, and maintaining a competitive legal monetary product. What are the chances that the legal monetary product business is a working monopoly? What is the price of admission, what is the price of a license, who pays whom to begin dealing in the legal money business? Who is most certainly not allowed to even begin inventing, producing, and maintaining legal money? The person specializing in elderly care can't start his business without the means to pay the bills that must be paid before the customers start paying for the higher quality and lower cost elderly care, because the person specializing in elderly care does not invent, produce, and maintain his own legal money. If the person specializing in elderly care did specialize in inventing, producing, and maintaining his own legal money too, having two specialties, then there would be no need to pay for the legal money services offered by lower quality, and higher cost, competition, in the legal money supply business. How much does it cost a customer who is unable, or unlicensed, to invent, produce, and maintain their own legal money, as that customer buys a legal money service from the monopoly legal money power? A. Special Interest payments transferred from the person starting an Elderly Care service to the monopoly legal money service provider. B. No alternative encouraged by those operating the law power, or the "free market" proponents, and no application of inventive use of common sense, reason, logic, or moral conscience, driving the person to cut out the costly middle man because all such competitive thinking is willfully censored by those who perpetuate the legal money monopoly fraud. I don't know what your thoughts are, but I know mine. In that example the practice of printing Elderly Care dollars, with a simple, freeware, open source computer program, could be a competitive, inventive, method of producing, and maintaining the start up capital needed to start that competitive business, and as such the other legal monetary producers will be forced to offer their services at a lower cost, or they go out of business. Example 2: Another student, Julian from New Zealand, came up with a creative solution to personal security challenges that plague both travelers and worried parents of small children. His idea makes a twist on GPS tracking, and if he takes the necessary steps to build this business, I’m convinced it could be worth $20 million to a big satellite company in a few years. If the idea sells itself, investors want a piece of the action, so what constitutes the demarcation line between an investor that has the power to invest and an investor that does not have enough power to invest? In this case consider the word choices used by the author to communicate a powerful investor. A. Big Satellite Company ($20 million is the measure of big) B. Travelers C. Worried parents What is the power that causes A to be more powerful, as an investor, than B and C? What causes the demand for a middle man between the traders B, C, and the producer of something that sells itself well enough to attract "investors"? B and C invest in the product by buying it. The product traded to B and C is an investment in that which is traded by B and C. Why is there a need for an additional investor, what does the additional investor sell: interest in the business? What is this "interest" in that business? The seller of the idea, product, or service can sell directly to the customers, and therefore the customers are the only investors needed, and the price is determined by the exclusive arrangements between the producer of the idea and the consumers of the idea, and in so doing the producer of the idea buys whatever the consumers of the idea are selling, which can be anything, gold, silver, tickets for Elderly Care Service, dollars, cooper, oil barrels full of oil, watts of electricity, anything. Everything can be converted to everything else, accurately, and by mutual agreement, with very little added cost, due to modern technology. How much of what you are offering is worth what I am offering? For lack of employment of an easy to maintain conversion, a legal money monopoly is invented and fed every scrap of excess power while it devours everything in sight? Why is A in a position to "invest", as a middle man, between those who trade GPS tracking for whatever is being sold by those who get GPS tracking during that mutually beneficial, equitable, exchange? Why is A raised to a position above B, C, or the potential seller of GPS tracking? Who elected the employers of the money monopoly power dictators for life? Why does the potential seller of GPS tracking have to pay someone else to start a business selling products that will sell themselves, since the product is a high demand product or service? That is what I think. I don't know what you think. Example 3: Another student, Kim from Germany, recognized that the growing appeal of precious metals in the broader consumer market warrants a higher level of quality in portfolio tracking services. His team came up with some extremely clever ideas for a precious metals portfolio app, and given where we are in the commodity’s growth phase, the idea has significant merit. That reminds me of Pay Pal Wars. I can link you to the book, you can read it too. http://www.amazon.com/PayPal-Wars-Battles-Media-Planet/dp/0974670103 Two of the people involved in Pay Pal are Elon Musk, and Peter Theil. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel There are competitors in the legal money markets. The idea that one legal money, such as The Dollar Hegemony, is powerful, is the source of their power, the idea is the source of power, and it is false. Their source of power is deception. That should tell you something. Something like this: It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. Example 4. Government is what creates the problems to begin with; they are not the solution. We are the solution. Nurturing those skills to become self-reliant and create value in the world, or investing in others’ capabilities to do so, is a much more productive way to fight. When "government" is the word used to describe Legal Crime, or "involuntary association", it can then be known that that is the definition of "government", in that context. Government: The willful enslavement of the many, by the few, into an involuntary association. The few invent, produce, and maintain that definition of government, as they carry out their willful plans, as they exploit their targeted victims, and in so doing, government is defined in that exclusive way. When that is the only definition of government, the exclusive definition of government, without any higher quality, and lower cost defining government, of any kind, it can be known, then, that there is a monopoly government power - and it can be known, exactly in that way, that there is no competitive government whatsoever. Is that true? Is that an accurate perspective? Is there only one government power, and is the only government power defined as an enforced, involuntary, association between the enforcers and those who are targeted for enforcement? That is what I think about that link. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, In this work that I choose to do, there are methods by which the focus of attention moves into finer, closer, microscopic, narrow angle of view, in ways similar to an old term "in fine" or in ways similar to a new term "micro" inspection, to view, to see, to perceive, and to decipher, to discriminate, to reason, to acknowledge, to understand, and to know, more accurately, a specific thing, instead of a general thing. Another way to convey the scale, of micro to macro, or from fine to course, from ambiguity to accuracy, is to say that the way of viewing is from a principled, general, viewpoint on one end, and then moving down to a interest, specific, viewpoint. Course <-> Fine Macro <-> Micro General <-> Specific Principle <-> Interest Gather information <-> Understand information Vital Questions <-> Accurate Answers Observe, Orient, Decide, Act  Stepping back from a recent effort to move from principle to interest, or from observing to orientation, or from course to fine, I see a need now to return back to a wide angle of view. My decisions and actions are principally geared toward writing, or communicating, and the return to observing mode, is a decision to regain control over the message being communicated. Let know one who has been on this road of principled command of perception, seeking a more accurate viewpoint, be surprise when (or God Help us "if") a new polarizing event occurs in the near future. What do I mean, you may say, you may ask, as all that text above appears to confuse a wandering soul, someone who is not polarized in any direction currently, someone who is a ship without a rudder, someone who is led to slaughter, but not yet running into the meat grinder as they are told? I mean, specifically, that another 911 is pending, on the books, without question, as was 911 before it happened, and those of us who are already polarized in such a way as to know the reasons for 911, those of us who understand why 911 was planned, it was not an accident, are those of us who were not surprised by 911 while it happened. I remember the moment I began to hear the false advertizing as the false news media began to brainwash the victims with the false story that they had already written so as to polarize the victims on a path of their design, whereby power then accelerates the rate of acceleration from the victims to the Legal Criminals. When the natives (victims) grow restless, directionless, they may grow less susceptible to control by the Legal Criminals. When the natives are polarized and forced by deception, threats of violence, and violent injury, for too long, they may grow less susceptible to control by the Legal Criminals. Therefore the Legal Criminals are bound by those extremes, and they cannot allow the victims to move to far to either extreme, and knowing this, from a wide angle of view, you can see the current situation, right now, from this wider angle of view, and you can know too, that a polarizing event is soon to be employed by the Legal Criminals, and if they fail to cause one to happen, soon, we win. You may not be on the edge of your seat. Why not? Timing is everything. Are you lost? Many people are not lost. Many people on both sides are not, at all, lost. You don't know which side you are on? You don't even know that there are two sides? You are in the middle of the two sides if you do not know that there are two sides. If you use dollars, you are on one or the other side. Two sides: Honest Productive Americans (victims) ->->->->-> Legal Criminals Those who know the fuller measure of the current situation know that a polarizing event is inevitable, it has been building since 911, there is now static in the air, the event will be on the scale with 911, if it is caused by the Legal Criminals, and they win. If Ron Paul is elected president of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) we win. Now you have a scale of time. 911 = September 11, 2001 New, pending, Polarizing Event that must be invented, produced, executed, and maintained by the Legal Criminals We win on Tuesday, November 6, 2012 8:00 pm [-05:00] http://www.7is7.com/otto/countdsamp.html Call that a window of opportunity. You are not on the edge of your seat? You don't know what is at stake? You have no concept, no scale, no measure of the power struggle? Legal Criminals can torture with impunity. You can't. Legal Criminals can serial kill millions of innocent people, including babies, toddlers, pregnant mothers, honest hard working mothers and fathers, wise old men and women, genius examples of the best that humanity has yet to produce, and if you kill someone, even in self-defense, you can be punished, while Legal Criminals mass murder with impunity. Legal Criminals can double the supply of legal dollars at will, or cut the supply of purchasing power in half, at will, with impunity, while you have to work two jobs just to pay the bills that slow down the rate of decline in your standard of living. What do you think will be on the minds of the Legal Criminals when they see their power over you deteriorating in measurable ways, such as an upstart Congressman gaining enough currency, enough popular support, to command that wave of power, like a tsunami, heading right, straight, at the Legal Crime Power? At least, at the very least, the Legal Criminals fear the loss of their gravy train. If they know history they know that heads have rolled for less, at the threshold of the guillotine. Some of the torture victims have an axe to grind. Some of the surviving members of the families who have been mass murdered are looking for vengeance, and the Legal Criminals know that the Legal Criminals train their victims to confuse vengeance with justice. While the Legal Criminals laugh all the way to their fraudulent banks they can no longer do so with absolute confidence, unless their deceit has infected their own power of accurate discernment, and their smiles, all the way to their fraudulent banks, must be slightly less happy for them, as the tsunami approaches. I'm not speaking about a tsunami that is aiming at Islamic Finance, or Muslims, or Arabs, or the terrorists. I am speaking about the tsunami that is heading right, straight, at the Legal Criminals, and you don't know it, unless that wave is now polarizing you too. Those who are polarized, on that wave, that tsunami that is heading right, straight, at the Legal Criminals, is heading for Liberty, and the Legal Criminals volunteer to get in front of it. Do you see that? Do you understand the dynamics? Can my words paint the picture for you? Those who are polarized toward Liberty are moving in the opposite direction of victimization. See it? Suppose the power of victimization is measurable as an earthquake under the ocean. The tectonic plates grind the victims under intense pressure until the victims are no longer able to bear that intense load of pressure, and the power of victimization explodes and becomes such an obvious hell on earth that the power to escape that horror, and that terror becomes a tidal wave, a tsunami of wide awake former victims, as the entire population of victims gather up their number into a single force, a single wave of former victims escaping the bonds of victimization. The tsunami of former victims expand in a wave away from the epicenter of the power that was once destroying their number. What do you think the Legal Criminals will do to regain their power? They have to figure out a way to channel that release of all that power so as to regain control over all those former victims, or failing to do so, their victims will reach liberty, and once liberated they will know the full measure of liberty, having just escaped from abject servitude, they will know honest productivity, and the rewards of higher standards of living, and lower costs of living, having just escaped from the race to the bottom of hell, they will know better than to believe in the lies produced by the Legal Criminals, and the only reason to look back in the direction of Legal Crime will be to know not to ever allow it to happen again. The Legal Criminals have to get in front of the tsunami with a powerful invention, an they have to produce that power that will divert the power of that tsunami, whereby that tsunami is then no longer heading right, straight, for Liberty. See? So long as the polarizing power toward liberty, away from Legal Crime, continues to build, just before it is set off, there is a window of opportunity. The Legal Criminals can't operate outside of their limits of power, and they are very close to doing exactly that, and failure on their part will start the march toward Liberty, and that tsunami will leave Legal Crime behind forever. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1022.html Anyone, I am going to communicate an optional viewpoint that does not follow the left/right or socialist/capitalist script as it has become known, currently, as a polarizing, perpetuating, internalized, conflict. Gary North writes: That's what Dr. Marx taught, too. He called this process the exploitation of labor. He argued that employers – capitalists – extract value from laborers because employers pay them less than they are worth. Capitalists pay laborers only survival wages, and then pocket the difference. To help understand the optional viewpoint I will paint a picture for the reader, and once the reader has this picture in view the reader can look from that place to the ongoing left/right conflict. You can go to a safe place, an objective place, and from that objective, safe, place, you can look back at, and measure the full measure, of the place of man-made conflict. Are you up to it? Picture a society whereby the supply of money to the honest productive people within the society is abundant, not scarce, abundant. You may have trouble with that picture. You may have a very hard time conceptualizing such a society. I can help. In such a society as a society whereby the honest productive people have ready access to money, an abundant supply of money, there is a scale by which that abundance, and that ready access flows from the source of the money to the users of the money, and on that scale there are extreme limits on each end, and any honest productive person exists on that scale, and being on that scale from one end, or the other end, is a fact of being honest, and it is a fact of being productive, and it is therefore a fact of being able to employ money on that scale. Those who are very, very, very, and most, extremely, dishonest, are on one end of the scale. Those who are very, very, very, and most, extremely, unproductive, are on one end of the scale. Those who are very, very, very, and most, extremely, honest, are on the other end of the scale. Those who are very, very, very, and most, extremely, productive, are on the other end of the scale. Most Destructive and Dishonest<->destructive and dishonest<-> neither destructive or productive and neither honest or dishonest<->productive and honest<->Most Productive and Honest That is the scale and that scale is the scale by which the flow of money flows from the producers of money to the users of money readily while at the same time the flow of money does not readily flow from the producers of money to the torturing mass murderers and those who lie, those who steal, and those who rob, rape, torture, and murder, and those who destroy as an occupation. Most Destructive and Dishonest<->destructive and dishonest<-> neither destructive or productive and neither honest or dishonest<->productive and honest<->Most Productive and Honest Least access to money, money is most scarce on this end of the same scale above->->->->->->->->->->->->Most access to money, money is abundant on this end of the same scale above You now have before you an easy to see social network whereby the power to produce (money is purchasing power or it isn't money) flows to those who can produce the most power to produce while, at the same time, the power to destroy does not flow to those who are most capable of abusing the power to produce in the work of destroying everything including the power to produce. I've painted the picture, you can ignore it, you can fail to see it, you can fail to ask vital questions concerning what it is, and how to make it work best, but it is, and it will always be what it is, even if you refuse to see it. If you see it, get in it, know it, be it, and accept it, as it exists, and from that point, look back, look back from that point to the social network at work today whereby socialism is set-up against capitalism in it's present form. From here: Most Destructive and Dishonest<->destructive and dishonest<-> neither destructive or productive and neither honest or dishonest<->productive and honest<->Most Productive and Honest Least access to money, money is most scarce on this end of the same scale above->->->->->->->->->->->->Most access to money, money is abundant on this end of the same scale above From there look back to here: Honest Productive People>->->->->->->>->->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->Legal Criminals Those who employ money to make more productive power send the total of their productive work to those who then use that power stolen in the work of destruction to keep the power to do so perpetually There are two ways to prove to you that the social network working now is the second social network above, and those two methods of proving to you are as follows: A. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ B. http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Whenever someone claims that socialism is opposite capitalism, think twice, or think as many times as needed to get out of that hell hole. It is a rigged game. Socialism is not even remotely connected to capitalism, unless you define socialism as an opposite of capitalism, and then, as far as you are concerned, that is what socialism is, as socialism, to you, is the opposite of capitalism, to you, and everyone else who is caught up in that rat trap, clap trap, lie, falsehood, self-destructive merry go round, business cycle insanity, bull expletive. Socialism has a long history, and it was, is, and will be a scientific approach toward the study of society, in the effort to improve society. Like a gun, or a pointed stick, socialism can be employed by honest productive people as well as socialism can be employed by dishonest destructive people any time, any place, right now, or in the next span of time until human beings are no longer living. Capitalism has a long history, and it was, is, and will be a method of pricing and that is about it, as far as I know. Capitalism can be anything any honest productive person wants it to be, and capitalism can be anything any dishonest destructive person wants it to be, any time, any where, from now on. The socialism versus capitalism dogmatic, and false, method of enslaving targeted victims by those who invent, produce, and maintain that false method of enslaving targeted victims is exactly that, and it was that, and it will be that, for as long as it works that way, as long as the targeted victims allow it to work that way. Left versus Right Socialism versus Capitalism Communism versus Fascism Democrats versus Republicans Organized crime group A versus Organized crime group B Legal Crime group A versus Legal Crime group B The labels hide the names of the actual people who invent, produce, and maintain those types of connections, those types of social networks, those types of arrangements that are, without the lies, and are without the false fronts, INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS. When there are battles going on whereby those who invent, produce, and maintain VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS, are being targeted by those who invent, produce, and maintain INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS you have, before you, regime change of a different nature, a different order, and a regime change that cannot be known by the victims if the legal criminals have enough power to make sure that the victims don't know that a defensive battle is even possible; hence the need to invent, produce, and maintain the false battle, where one offensive side fights another offensive side - kill or be killed - race to the bottom, might makes right, etc. If the victims are fighting a false battle, whereby the victims are fighting each other, they then have little or no power being employed in the work that can cause the end of victimization. The end of victimization is out of sight, out of mind, as minds are filled with this false, man-made, premeditated, schedule of perpetual aggressive wars for profit, internally, and externally. Do you have that understood? How many ways can that be shown to you, whereby you can still manage to ignore it? Will you ever question the lies that you have accepted as fact? Back to Gary North: That's what Dr. Marx taught, too. He called this process the exploitation of labor. He argued that employers – capitalists – extract value from laborers because employers pay them less than they are worth. Capitalists pay laborers only survival wages, and then pocket the difference. All of that is nonsense. It is abject acceptance of falsehood driving false solutions. You can know this, easily. You don't have to rely upon the expertise of an Austrian Economist to dig your own way out of the mire. When purchasing power flows to honest productive people in abundance, instead of the opposite, whereby purchasing power flows readily, quickly, rapidly, into the hands of the most destructive among us, what happens? What happens if the following measures of the current falsified conflict is reversed? A. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ B. http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. What happens if those measures of the current falsified conflict are reversed? It may or may not be capitalism. It may or may not be socialism. It will be a social network that measurably allows, voluntarily, the flow of power flowing to the people who are most able to use that power in the work of making more power. What happens when power is abundant? Why will the label capitalism fit that which will be, in the absence of the falsified conflict, or why will socialism fit? Capitalism is just, and only, a method of pricing, and it is a method of pricing that is employed by the person using that method to move power to them from someone else, and that is it, and it can be capitalism whenever it works for whomever it works and so what, big deal, it is not something to die for, it is not something to torture people to keep, it isn't worth anything more than any other pricing method at any time, in any place, when there is abundance, and when the buyers have a competitive option. Capitalism is a pricing method. If it is more to you, if it is something else, and you define what it is, to you, and to whomever you share that exclusive definition, whereby your group define capitalism that way, so what, big deal, pat yourselves on the back, you have a neat pricing method, good enough for you, and whatever else you add to that pricing method, and by whatever definition you share with anyone concerning your versions of capitalism. Is capitalism the thing you use to excuse legal torture and legal mass murder? Is your pricing method worth that much to you? What is capitalism to you? This: Honest Productive People>->->->->->->>->->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->>->->->->->->Legal Criminals Those who employ money to make more productive power send the total of their productive work to those who then use that power stolen in the work of destruction to keep the power to do so perpetually If that is the bare bones, no false advertizing, no false fronts, no hidden agendas, no secret deals, no dirty compromises, out in the open, true, accurate, real, factual thing you know to be as capitalism, then capitalism isn't just a pricing method, to you. If that is capitalism, to you, and your group, then capitalism isn't this: Most Destructive and Dishonest<->destructive and dishonest<-> neither destructive or productive and neither honest or dishonest<->productive and honest<->Most Productive and Honest Least access to money, money is most scarce on this end of the same scale above->->->->->->->->->->->->Most access to money, money is abundant on this end of the same scale above When the power to purchase moves more readily to those who employ power, in the necessary work required to produce more power, the end result will be an abundance of power sooner than any other flow of power, such as when the flow of power flows rapidly from those who create power to those who steal it and use it to destroy any competition anywhere. When the power to purchase moves more readily to those who employ power in the necessary work required to move power to dishonest people who destroy things, you have this: A. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ B. http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Call that socialism if it makes you feel better about it. It is still it. Call that capitalism, if it makes you feel better about it. It is still it. It is still doing what it does best. Back to Gary North: That's what Dr. Marx taught, too. He called this process the exploitation of labor. He argued that employers – capitalists – extract value from laborers because employers pay them less than they are worth. Capitalists pay laborers only survival wages, and then pocket the difference. The Gold Bugs, and the Austrian Economists, call them conservatives, or call them republicans, or call them friends of Liberty, or constitutionalists, or whatever label works for you, but don't call them late for dinner. They want purchasing power to be scarce. That is their tune. So long as purchasing power is scarce, so long will some people (those who know how to gain control over scarce things) be more powerful than those who don't. That is their tune. It is based upon the idea that value, the full and only measure of value, is measured on a scale of scarcity. Like this: Most scarce, very scarce, pretty scarce, kinda scarce, not scarce or abundant, kinda abundant, pretty abundant, very abundant, most abundant Most valuable, very valuable, kinda valuable, not as valuable, even less valuable, nearly absent any value, hardly worth anything, worth nothing That is a very flawed economic theory, as it ignores, on purpose, the value of generosity, and it ignores, by willful ignorance, or just plain stupidity, the value of power. If power is abundant it is more powerful, not less, it is more valuable, not less, depending upon who does the measuring. If power is scarce it is only more powerful for those who have the power to get more power than anyone else. See? So, that is the measure of error in that viewpoint, as anyone with a brain can see, assuming, of course, that the man hears more than just what he what's to hear. I've spilled the beans. I've blown the whistle. What can the capitalists do, once they know the truth about their pricing methods? They are trained to accept only one option, which is to move closer to socialism, once they have been shown the limitations of the capitalist pricing method. That is the insanity of the left/right falsehood. That is the brilliancy, or genius, of the left/right falsehood. Who does the measuring? Are you an insane victim. Are you a member of the legal crime syndicate of economic and political geniuses pretending to be making the same mistakes over and over again? How do you earn your living? Who pays the bills you alone create? If the use of your brilliant, genius, left/right falsehood fills your bank account, you may find out soon, that you are just another one of the insane victims, and you have fair warning, from more than just another conscientious objector, you even have warnings offered to you from above, and I don't mean Gold. Back to Gary North: That's what Dr. Marx taught, too. He called this process the exploitation of labor. He argued that employers – capitalists – extract value from laborers because employers pay them less than they are worth. Capitalists pay laborers only survival wages, and then pocket the difference. I return to that because that says so much. What happens when power flows readily, abundantly, to those who employ power best at the work of making more power? They get a little and they produce so much more, and compare that to sending power to those who get a lot and they use what the get to destroy everything in sight. That is a vital question, and therefore an accurate answer is required, a must have, and failing to have the accurate answer can be worse than failing to ask the question, since the wrong answer can invent, and produce, a wrong path, a path heading further away from the right path, while the person who has not yet asked the question may yet ask it, and may yet gain the accurate answer. and may then embark on the better path sooner. How much on the wrong path will pass before the traveler realizes what is found at the end of that wrong path? What happens when power flows readily, abundantly, to those who employ power best at the work of making more power? Jobs, employment, opportunity, and an abundant supply of new, productive, things to be done, can be what happens when power flows readily, abundantly, to those who employ power best at the work of making more power. What happens when there are many, many, many more job opportunities than there are people who are ready, willing, and able to fill those job opportunities? The shoe goes on to the other foot. A worker becomes the employer. Like this: Joe is a person needing help to complete a large work load, failing to gain the help needed will be total failure since another competitor does not fail in this work of finding, hiring, and paying workers to work. Jack is a temporarily unemployed person deciding which job to take, among an abundant supply of jobs, not wanting to be too generous, not wanting to give up too much for too little. Generous but not to a fault, not stupidly generous, not generous to a point of weakness. One can't be generous without anything to give. Joe interviews Jack: Joe: "Jack, sit down, please, I'm offering you less than the minimum wage required by law, because I can." Jack: "Stuff it." Back to Gary North: That's what Dr. Marx taught, too. He called this process the exploitation of labor. He argued that employers – capitalists – extract value from laborers because employers pay them less than they are worth. Capitalists pay laborers only survival wages, and then pocket the difference. If the Gold Bugs get to keep a monetary system that manages to make purchasing power scarce to everyone except those who are best able to deceive targeted victims, or threaten targeted victims, or injure targeted victims, or torture targeted victims, or mass murder targeted victims, then power will remain scarce, on purpose, because power can't be allowed to reach a level that is even remotely close to abundance, because abundant power will find it's way into the hands of honest productive people, and that will result in honest productive people doing what they do best, which is production, which will be powerful, which will move the production of power more toward abundance, including the production of an abundant supply of job opportunities. Joe interviews Jack: Joe: "Jack, sit down, please, I'm offering you less than the minimum wage required by law, because I can." Jack: "Stuff it." Back to Gary North: [Note: the phrase "pocket the difference" is the very heart of the endless debates among all schools of economic opinion. Why? Because nobody keeps the money in his pocket for long. He does something with it. So, to understand economics, follow the money: into pockets and out of pockets.] Please don't get the wrong idea. I'm not blowing the whistle on Gary North. I think that Gary North knows the facts as good as anyone I've read living today. Gold may dominate a free market as the highest quality legal currency taking most of the market share because it is higher in quality and lower in cost than all competitors combined. That can be, and I'm not here to argue. How is that fact established, if it will be a fact? Is it a fact that gold is the best money? I don't know. I think not. I think that electricity is a much better legal currency. The trouble with electricity being money, not currency, is that electricity is a "use it or lose it" form of legal currency. Storing electricity is yet again another market. Electricity is a very productive form of legal currency. Electricity is a very high quality legal currency, because it is exactly what it is, and it is therefore a very exact standard of purchasing power. One watt is exactly one watt, no more, no less, ever. That is what I think, not what Gary North thinks. I may be alone in my thoughts. You can be the judge. You are. Back to Gary North: Therefore, Marx concluded, the way to get rich is to set up a business in India and China, where there are enormous pools of labor to be exploited. Oops, sorry; that's not what Marx taught. He said that the way to get rich was to imitate his partner, Frederick Engels, who ran a factory in Manchester. Well, he did not actually admit that his partner was a capitalist exploiter, but he knew how the man made enough money to put him on the dole for 30 years. So, Marx argued, the way to get rich is to set up a business in a growing economy – a capitalist economy – where there are fewer laborers than in Asia, and who live far better than Asians did in 1850. Exploit richer workers – that's the ticket to wealth! I want to explore the optional viewpoint much more than I have the time to do so, at this time, so I have to cut this short. The above quote reminds me of a lesson learned. The lesson I learned had to do with the two default viewpoints combined into the one conflict viewpoint, and how, historically, that played out. Left versus Right = One thing (A man-made, self destructive, perpetuating, conflict) In the Communist Manifesto there are quotes that may be attributed to Marx or Engels. Confusing the two may be a bad idea. In those quotes the message is clearly marking the differences between the false conflict and the options. A. The one thing (left versus right = one coin with two heads) B. Not A (Options) The false conflict was said to be, specifically, COMMUNISM versus Capitalism, and in The Communist Manifesto the option viewpoint was spelled out as Socialism, and even that was specified as the Socialism spoken of by specific proponents of Socialism. Here: http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html PREFACE TO 1888 ENGLISH EDITION Down here: Yet, when it was written, we could not have called it a _socialist_ manifesto. By Socialists, in 1847, were understood, on the one hand the adherents of the various Utopian systems: Owenites in England, Fourierists in France, both of them already reduced to the position of mere sects, and gradually dying out; on the other hand, the most multifarious social quacks who, by all manner of tinkering, professed to redress, without any danger to capital and profit, all sorts of social grievances, in both cases men outside the working-class movement, and looking rather to the "educated" classes for support. Whatever portion of the working class had become convinced of the insufficiency of mere political revolutions, and had proclaimed the necessity of total social change, called itself Communist. It was a crude, rough-hewn, purely instinctive sort of communism; still, it touched the cardinal point and was powerful enough amongst the working class to produce the Utopian communism of Cabet in France, and of Weitling in Germany. Thus, in 1847, socialism was a middle-class movement, communism a working-class movement. Socialism was, on the Continent at least, "respectable"; communism was the very opposite. And as our notion, from the very beginning, was that "the emancipation of the workers must be the act of the working class itself," there could be no doubt as to which of the two names we must take. Moreover, we have, ever since, been far from repudiating it. Note the use of the following term: social quacks The Enemies of Communism, therefore, are known. Owenites Fourierists Those were the enemies of the Communism versus Capitalism battle. Those were the optional viewpoints. Those where the ones opting out of the false paradigm. I have learned a lesson about those options. From those options, in America, the following options were invented: 1. http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf That was explained further, in historical context, by the following: Owen, Fourier, St. Simon, and more, have worthily sought to solve the problem of a harmonious human society; and although they have all tailed to discover the true methods of reform, they have done, in the effort to do so, other and most valuable work. They have laid bare the vices of the old règime with a terrific fidelity. They have, like Carlyle, disgusted mankind with their own portraiture. At the same time they have sketched with a potent hand an enchanting picture of the “golden age of the future,” which contrasts in all men’s minds forcibly, at this day, with the antagonism, the wasteful expenditure of means, the ignorance, and crime, and sickness, and squalor, and filth, and wretchedness, and the broad and painful but ludicrous diversities of poverty and wealth, and the mercenary degradation of all classes, which disgrace the existing state of our social organization. Fourier has done even far more than this. His masterly analysis of the human passions is an invaluable contribution to man’s knowledge of himself. His daring but shadowy outline of a science of universal analogy, which would be entitled, if once put fairly upon the firm basis of a known science, to the denomination of “The Science of Sciences,” is eminently worthy of estimation, if regarded as merely suggestive, and stimulating to more sedate and systematic investigations in the same direction, and equally dangerous if accepted for what it claims to be an ascertained basis from which to reason in practical science. http://www.anarchism.net/scienceofsociety.htm The lesson is such that other people know the same lesson, in other words: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/pilgers-law-if-its-been-officially-denied-then-itrsquos-probably-true-959206.html Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it’s probably true' The Communist Manifesto officially denies Socialism and not ambiguously, there is a specific reference to a pre-corruption Socialism, or Socialism before it was corrupted by the Legal Criminals in much the same way as the Nationalists corrupted the Federalism, and in much the same was as Rick Perry is corrupting the Tea Party, and in much the same way as, perhaps, Newt Gingrich corrupts The Republican Party. Owenites in England, Fourierists in France Those options instead of the two headed coin were imported, improved, and those types of options became such things as Equitable Commerce. There are other examples: 2. http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm Mutual Banking (look up The Parasite City please) And here: http://lysanderspooner.org/node/40 A New System of Paper Currency Listen up. Those are American versions of options that are outside of the Left/Right conflict, so, what does the "Right" have to say about those American born options, and keep in mind Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it’s probably true' You have to go to the Right side's official mouthpiece, and you probably don't even know who that is, so I can offer to you a very competitive competitor for the official, no bones, free market, mouth piece, the literal horses mouth, for the established free market right side of the two headed coin. Here: http://mises.org/books/egalitarianism.pdf Murray Rothbard Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature 13 THE SPOONER–TUCKER DOCTRINE: AN ECONOMIST’S VIEW Remember a few things here please, before I begin quoting: 1. The mouth piece of the free market right does not touch Equitable Commerce with a 10 foot pole, as far as the Free Market Right (tm) is concerned the author of Equitable Commerce is persona non grata. 2. The closest I have ever found of any spokesperson of the Free Market Right (tm) challenging Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren are the quotes I am going to quote now. 3. Spooner was a spokes person contemporary to, or at the same time as, Josiah Warren and Stephen Pearl Andrews, all of which came after Owen and Fourier, all of which are contemporaries with Marx and Engels, more or less, and then following Josiah Warren are the works of Benjamin Tucker, with his publications of Liberty, for example, the time line is thereby reported, and it is a significant time in human history. Murray Rothbard had to skip over Josiah Warren, as if Equitable Commerce didn't exist, and then Rothbard sets about to discredit Spooner and Tucker. Spooner wrote A New System of Paper Currency, which you can read yourself. Tucker helped publish a magazine called Liberty. Here are the quotes from Rothbard as he discredits his competition: Actually, in contrast to collectivist anarchists and to many other types of radicals, Spooner and Tucker tried to use economics rather than scorn it as excessively rational. Some of their fallacies (for example, the “law of cost,” the labor theory of value) were embedded in much of classical economics; and it was their adoption of the labor theory of value that convinced them that rent, interest, and profit were payments exploitatively extracted from the worker. In contrast to the Marxists, however, Spooner and Tucker, understanding many of the virtues of the free market, did not wish to abolish that noble institution; instead, they believed that full freedom would lead, by the workings of economic law, to the peaceful disappearance of these three categories of income. The mechanism for this peaceful abolition Spooner and Tucker found—and here they unfortunately ignored the teachings of classical economics and substituted instead their own fallacies—in the sphere of money. That is bait and switch, combined with a Man of Straw product. There is no argument possible as to the cost principle which is Josiah Warren's observation reported in Equitable Commerce. Rothbard baits with an inaccurate reference to the cost principle by twisting it and replacing it with his own construction of "law of cost" and then his own Man of Straw in "The Labor Theory of Value (tm)". So, politically, destructive politics, or resort to deceit, is a play here in measurable ways by Rothbard as he resorts to deceit as a means of destroying competition, and it is specifically competition in money markets that is targeted by Rothbard. A. Do not mention that which must not be acknowledged, which is the same thing happening right now as the Legal Criminals do not mention Ron Paul. Murray Rothbard, and all the right side dogmatists do not mention Josiah Warren and Equitable Commerce, at all. To mention Josiah Warren is to give support to monetary competition, a no win situation for the monopolists who pay lip service to competition. B. Corrupt the message that does manage to become currently known by a significant number of people, despite refusal to even mention that which must not be acknowledged. In other words: if the competitive message does get out, despite all effort to keep the competitive message censored, the next best thing is to alter, corrupt, and spin the message that does get out, and at the same time avoid mentioning the actual message as much as possible. C. Attack the corrupted message, once the corrupted Man of Straw is in place, and misdirect all attention away from the actual message. A Man of Straw is constructed with an obvious flaw, and then the constructor of the Man of Straw has power over that weak opponent, while the actual opponent is thereby hidden. The actual opponent will be left in an indefensible position if The Man of Straw gains currency, or, in other words, if the Man of Straw is believed to be a true representation of the censored, defeated, competitive message. See the Federalist versus Anti-Federalist conflict for a prime, text book, example of the tactic, as Nationalists hid behind a false front of Federalism, and they even managed to implant the name Anti-Federalist on their competitors who were, in all fact, the true Federalists of the day. That is textbook political deception. More from Murray Rothbard: The two basic interrelated fallacies of Spoonerite theory (and the theory of all schools of writers who have unkindly been labelled by economists as “money-cranks”) are a failure to understand the nature of money and the nature of interest. 4 (footnote) First off: you can read Spooner's actual work, if you care to, and you can know that it is sound, and his work is far closer to capitalism, it is capitalism in fact, it employes the same pricing method, based upon scarcity, and therefore the whole attack on Spooner is ludicrous, laughable, or even stupid - certainly ignorant. Secondly: the actual alternative, the cost principle, and the principle of individuality, combined as a basis for Equitable Commerce, a competitor, the actual target of Rothbard's false political spin, the same thing that inspired Tucker, is again misrepresented by Rothbard, it is entirely side stepped, with the reference to "monetary-cranks". Call them names, when facts weaken your offering compared to the competition. Does that sound at all familiar? Thirdly: notice the tactic of claiming to blame the use of derogatory laguage, and inflammatory verbiage, on other people. Rothbard claims that it is unfair to call his Straw-Man "monetary-cranks", while he does it. Forth: the concept of interest is not "understood" in any sense of the word, and all the ambiguity of "interest", according to Rothbard, is the full measure of it. The interest he defines is ambiguity, it is ambiguity, and the idea is to keep "interest" a trade secret, something known only by a few, and something not knowable by the many, it is, as a term: fine print, it is too complicated on purpose. Interest is simple. Interest is nothing but the price on money. If competition is legal, then the price is driven down, and that is simple. It is simple to know why some people work to make money scarce. Once money is made scarce, the price on money can reach for the highest known limit ever in the history of human existence. That is simple stuff. It is interesting to know that capitalists want money to be scarce, on purpose, so as to make money prices go higher, and higher, and higher, in inverse proportion to money scarcity. If no one but a few have it, everyone else will pay anything to get it. Isn't that interesting? Here is Rothbards dodge: 4 (footnote) I've read some of the work done by various people in the effort to understand how modern political economy works, and there are many various angles of view, and in all but a very few cases there is a connection between the honest productive people and the legal criminals and that connection is denominated in the enforced legal monopoly currencies that are enforced by deceit, by threats of violence, and by acts of terrible, and horrible, violence upon the innocent victims. A measure of that "modern political economy" is that version offered by Rothbard, and it is not the measure of a free market economy, unless by defining "free" the word means freedom from moral conscience. What is being done by Murray Rothbard, with this reference to what he means by the word "interest" is another case of bait and switch, whereby the "interest" he claims is a false claim, he claims that his "interest" is "free market" interest, when it is demonstrably not, he is eluding to "interest" as it is measured under the influence of deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence upon the innocent, as the honest productive people are connected to the legal criminals by way of a legal monopoly monopoly extortion racket. Bait: Monetary interest functioning accurately in a social network that manages to avoid resort to deceit, threats of violence, and injury by aggressive violent attack, or, free market interest, as in: free from crime. Switch: See here, this is what I mean when I say "interest", see how it works the way I say it works, while I am pointing to interest that is working in a social network whereby purchasing power is made scarce by those few who have control over the one and only legal supply, and their exclusive control over the supply of purchasing power is by resort to deceit, mainly, but also by resort the threats of violence, which can also be a form of deceit, and by way of actual aggressive, premeditated, willful, violence upon the innocent targeted victims. Back to Murray Rothbard is his effort to demonize the competitive options that are outside of the Left/Right false front: Money-crankism assumes (1) that more and ever more money is needed on the market; (2) that the lower the interest rate the better; and (3) that the interest rate is determined by the quantity of money, the former being inversely proportional to the latter. Given this set of totally fallacious assumptions, the prescription follows: keep increasing the quantity of money and lowering the rate of interest (or profits). Murray Rothbard closely associates the names of Spooner and Tucker (presumably Benjamin Tucker of the Liberty publication) with "monetary crankism", without actual reference to their works, and then Murray Rothbard builds the Man of Straw, again a close association falsely made, a guilt by close association, and a false association between the names of Spooner and Tucker with "monetary crankism" and the definition of that Man of Straw made up by Murray Rothbard himself, and a definition that has nothing to do with the targets of Murray Rothbards lies. Look into the work of Spooner and note how his actual proposal ties the issue of money with existing land titles. That is as plain to see as the nose on your face, if you care to look. If, on the other hand, the idea is to ignore actual competition, so as not to lend the competition any support, any notice, and the idea follows through with a willful plan to misrepresent the competition, by constructing false representations of the competition, then anything can be said about the competition, then the false misrepresentation, on schedule, is thrown like mud onto the competition, and likely as not some of the mud sticks. Note the similarities in nomenclature between the right leaning half of the diametric perpetuating conflict and the left leaning half of the same coin? Engels (or Marx after his corruption): social quacks Rothbard (or any mouth piece of that half of that ongoing road to hell): monetary-cranks Don't forget Pilger's Law: Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it’s probably true' The truth is easy to see, once you can get past the left/right self destruction dogma. If competition is not destroyed by resort to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of aggressive, criminal, violence upon the innocent, then money will be forced to higher and higher quality, and at the same time, money will be forced to ever lower, and lower, and lower costs. What would be the result of such a force acting upon the production of money for a day, a week, a month, a year, a decade, a century, a millennium, or an eon? Money is power or it isn't money. Power moves toward abundance. What happens when power moves toward abundance? The cost goes down. What is interest? Interest is the cost of money. In whose best interest is it to make damn sure that power never reaches anything even close to abundance? Back to Murray Rothbard: Money-crankism assumes (1) that more and ever more money is needed on the market; (2) that the lower the interest rate the better; and (3) that the interest rate is determined by the quantity of money, the former being inversely proportional to the latter. Given this set of totally fallacious assumptions, the prescription follows: keep increasing the quantity of money and lowering the rate of interest (or profits). That has nothing to do with Spooner, or Tucker, or Equitable Commerce invented by Josiah Warren. That is a Man of Straw. That is a construction of Murray Rothbard, and it is plausibly deniable, or half true, or as ambiguous as needed, it is constructively interpretable, and it means only that which someone wants it to mean at any given time, and it can mean the exact opposite the next second. Spooner offered an expedient method of connecting economic actors, people, in a way that offers accountability. It is an example of competition in money markets. The effect of allowing competition in money markets is measurable as the force of competition forces the quality of the product produced up, or the service produced, upward, while the cost of the same production lowers, over time. Who has a competitive argument, and what would be the point of arguing? End competition? That ends my part in exposing the left side, and the right side, as two sides of the same anti-competition argument; an argument that is constructed to reach the goal of argument, or conflict, or to reach the goal of ensuring that argument, and conflict, work to limit, govern, and reduce power down, and down, and down, so as to make sure that power remains scarce, so that there isn't enough power available for all, certainly not enough power to afford the victims the power needed to avoid victimization. Back the Gary North: Before doing so, please know, I am almost never challenged, and you may guess why, since as you can see, I've done my homework. What does that say, world wide, about your authorities? Know. Know that I've been writing my viewpoint for decades, and I reach a world wide audience, and I can count those who challenge my viewpoint on one hand, and that is a measure of competition. Where are your authorities on political economy, if they are not in your own brain? Back to Gary North: Defenders of the free market, then as now, have argued that workers got richer, 1820-1850, because there was more capital investment per worker. Capitalists competed against each other to buy the services of workers. Real wages were going up in 1850 – higher than at any time in man's history. Please note that time frame. That time frame was the age of Spooner, Greene, Anderson, and Warren, an age of almost unrestricted competition in America, a hey day, a time after Jackson killed the monopoly bank of the day, a competition won even if it was won by another monopolist, the age was known by the Wildcat Banks. Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Banking_Era#1837.E2.80.931862:_.22Free_Banking.22_Era 1837–1862: "Free Banking" Era http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcat_banking non-federally regulated state banking between 1816 and 1863 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson After a titanic struggle, Jackson succeeded in destroying the Bank by vetoing its 1832 re-charter by Congress and by withdrawing U.S. funds in 1833. What was the polarizing event that ended competition soon after that era of lesser enforcement of monopoly power? Learn from history, or pay the cost. Back to Gary North: What was wrong with Marx's theory? First, there was not much surplus labor to exploit. Employers kept bidding up the price (wages) of any visible exploited labor in their quest for profit. (Greedy bastards!) Second, labor was not the only productive asset to provide economic value, contrary to the labor theory of value. In this fundamental sense, the labor theory of value was wrong, and Marx was the last famous economist to defend it. By the time he died, the labor theory of value had been dead for a decade. It was finally interred in the grave with Marx. It was about time. As Martha said of her brother Lazaurus' corpse, "It stinketh." Unlike Lazarus, there has been no resurrection of the labor theory of value. But the Keynesians have tried. How they have tried! Ask a vital question, and do not settle for anything less than an accurate answer. Who made up this "labor theory of value"? Gary North appears to suggest, but I don't here him saying so, that Marx either made that theory up, or Marx supported it. What is this "labor theory of value"? I don't know. But I have a quote by Eric Fromm, attributed to Marx, and it is how I will introduce my comments on this mysterious thing called "The Labor Theory of Value". http://www.amazon.com/Anatomy-Human-Destructiveness-Erich-Fromm/dp/080501604X For Marx, capital and labor were not merely two economic categories. Capital for him was the manifestation of the past, of labor transformed and amassed into things; labor was the manifestation of life, of human energy applied to nature in the process of transforming it. The choice between capitalism and socialism (as he understood it) amounted to this: Who (what) was to rule over what (whom)? What is dead over what is alive, or what is alive over what is dead? (Cf. E. Fromm, 1961, 1968) Now, from whose viewpoint can a theory be accurately explained? A. The critics of that viewpoint B. Those who have that viewpoint Who ever dreamed up a "Labor Theory of Value" (tm)? I submit, absent any information that proves otherwise (so far), that the opponents of that viewpoint are the ones who invented it, and when you ask them what it is, they will tell you that it is stupid, and they have created all the evidence needed to prove their claims. See how that works? I have observations to report to you, and you can measure these observations yourself. 1. Sticking my hand in a fire will cause my hand to burn, and my hand will be injured in proportion to the time that my hand is held in the fire. 2. Looking directly at the sun, will cause my eyes to be injured, and my injuries to my eyes will be proportional to the length of time that my eyes are focused directly at the sun. You can argue with me over my use of English. You can claim that those observations are theories. You can even make up a false version of my claims above, and you can claim that your false versions are my versions, and you can even claim that my reports of the facts are my theories, and your versions of my theories can be constructed by you to be stupid theories, as you tear apart the stupid theories that you constructed to misrepresent what I have just reported. 1. Sticking my hand in a fire caused my hand to burn, and my hand will be injured in proportion to the time that my hand is held in the fire. 2. Looking directly at the sun, will cause my eyes to be injured, and my injuries to my eyes will be proportional to the length of time that my eyes are focused directly at the sun. 3. Productive human labor is valuable in proportion to the value of the products produced by productive human labor. Now I have added a further observation, as a report to you, from me, and no one else but me. I can add additional observations concerning that accurate report of measurable reality. You can call it theory. What would be the point of you calling those observations by any other wording, at all? Why are your versions of my words better than my versions of my wording? Can you claim to know more about my measures of reality than I do? I don't know why Gary North is reporting things about Marx, or The Labor Theory of Value, and I've asked Gary North questions, by way of e-mail, and he is not reachable, measurable by the lack of response to my vital questions. I still read Gary North, because he is, so far, the most accurate reporter of the right wing perspective of that two sided man-made conflict. I can know better that which I prefer to avoid, so as to avoid it better, and it is not easy to avoid, the two sided man-made conflict is, in one word: ubiquitous. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ubiquitous existing or being everywhere, especially at the same time; omnipresent: ubiquitous fog; ubiquitous little ants. Back to Gary North, and this time I'm going to read through the whole article, pick out one more thing, and then I have yet to edit this monster. Audit the FED. Why waste power at all. Why not bypass them entirely, why not cut free from that extortion racket entirely? Waste no more time, energy, power, thought, labor, politics, or economy on that at all, please. Invent, produce, and maintain competitive legal money and all those legal criminals will eat each other for lack of ready victims. So, you may ask, what is an example of competitive legal money? 1. Gold 2. Silver 3. Oil 4. Electricity 5. Stamp Script 6. Labor Notes 7. Land title notes 8. Food 9. Water 10. Hydrogen and Oxygen, separated or together Which, you may ask, is better? Keep asking. It is a vital question. The answer will be unmistakable. It will corner the market, and if it is challenged by something better, later, it will no longer corner the market. Competition will force the quality higher. Competition will force the cost lower. The missing element is THE FORCE OF COMPETITION Monopoly power must use all the power necessary in the work of eliminating competition. Failing to eliminate competition means, by definition, that there will be competition. What does competition do? Competition forces the quality up. Competition forces the cost down. What does monopoly do? Is that a vital question? What is the accurate answer? Will a false answer be good enough? Monopoly forces quality down. Monopoly forces cost up. Is this a theory? Are you on crack? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
In answer to the posts added to this thread: No independent action will happen without independent thought, and so why not dream up your own independent action? Answer: You have yet to regain control of your thinking, so you can't act independently. So long as individuals are connected to other individuals through the current forms of connection so long will there be an enforced dependency, because that is the design of the connection. A. Involuntary Connection B. Voluntary Connection. That is as simple as it gets, and to address the separate comments posted I can do so from my independent perspective explained above, it may be your perspective too, I think not, based upon the responses. 1. Are laborers really that weak that anyone can just walk all over them? Since the connecting medium is designed to be involuntary the individuals who are connected are weakened by that connection, and the contrasting opposite form of connection would cause each individual to regain the power that has been lost as a result of being connected involuntarily. A weak laborer is only a weak laborer in the sense that there is an involuntary connection to a weak employer, due to the nature of the form of connection, which is an involuntary connection. The monopoly power employes everyone, from the top down, by design, that is how an involuntary connection is designed to work, and the laborers are as dependent upon the employer as the employer is dependent upon maintaining the involuntary connection. In other words: It is a master/slave form of connection. Without slaves, there is no master. Without employees there is no employer. Contrasted, in other words: A voluntary association does not enforce opposition, by design, so as to cause that dependency, on the contrary, there is neither master or slave, or there is (addressing semantics) master volunteering to be a master over a volunteer slave, but as soon as the slave decides not to be a slave, there is no master, and no slave, and there is no involuntary employer, without voluntary employees, when the design of the connection is voluntary, instead of the design of the connection being involuntary. Laborers are employers, employers are laborers, both are as strong, or as weak, as they are to their own capacity, there is no "passing on costs" from one to the other, by design, since the connection is voluntary, not involuntary. Step out of the involuntary clap trap, and see it for what it is, and where do you go, once you are out of the involuntary clap trap? You may then see that an idle person, someone unemployed, has no force working against him, or her, in finding employment, including no force working to take his power and use his power, or her power, to cause his, or her, competition to be more powerful. What does that look like? What would explain a lack of employment opportunity within a voluntary association? What would explain an over abundance of ready, willing, and able people ready to employ themselves? A laborer can print up, and trade, labor notes as money, or stocks in his ability to produce, as money, or any word that labels the invention, production, and maintenance of his, or her, individual example of competitive purchasing power, which is a power that is as strong, or as weak, as the individual is capable of producing the power to purchase, anything, anytime, anywhere, once the connection is no longer an enforced involuntary connection. Step out of the box, the hell hole, the enforced rat race to the bottom, and see that it is an option, and the often repeated "death and taxes" being inevitable is part of the enforcement mechanism, a damn lie. 2. So what are you proposing? I can understand that the question above was not asked of me, but I'm going to answer it anyway. An illustration of a proposal that can work is such: A date is declared to be the date at which time all the honest productive people are no longer going to accept an involuntary association, a new independence day, and I can illustrate that declaration with a proposed date. July 4th 2012 Once announced, and once accepted by one other person, the ball begins to roll toward that day. As more people accept that day, more people add their declarations, their own announcements of agreement to no longer accept an involuntary association. As that day approaches a few things will become abundantly clear, things that are part, and parcel, to the involuntary association that is obviously in force presently, and it is obviously growing even more powerful, at a rate that is accelerating, where even the rate of acceleration is accelerating toward absolute despotism, which is not unknown by mankind, as there are plenty of examples in history, not limited to Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, or Pol Pot Cambodia, all of which were financed by The Dollar Hegemony. The most obvious medium of connection is The Dollar, and that will become abundantly clear as people begin to take the steps necessary in reaching the goal by July 4th 2011, and therefore there will be competitive offerings of replacement currencies, and replacement people maintaining the replacement currencies. Simply put: The Federal Reserve System of Extortion will be phased out, and something of higher quality and lower cost will be operating after July 4th 2012, on schedule, and there is plenty of time from now until then to run the contest that weeds out all the low quality, and high cost, competitors, arriving at the few best competitors by July 4th 2012. On July 4th 2012 the new, voluntary, connections will be working, and the old regime will be avoided. An illustration of what the new regime will be, is in order, and my offering, which may, or may not resemble the voluntary connecting medium that does force out, peacefully, the lesser competitors, addresses the food question, as well as many other questions concerning independent power. My competitive (or not competitive enough) example of an illustrative voluntary connecting medium is offered in the form of two legal monetary products that I call Product 1, and Product 2. Product 1 is a legal denomination of legal value, which can be called a dollar, but it isn't the same issue as The Federal Reserve System of Extortion dollar, it is merely what it is, and it isn't anything secret, and it isn't anything unaccounted, it is, only, loans, and it is only loans that are denominated in a specific value of tax debt, which can be tied to something, a dollar, a gold ounce, a watt of electricity, or all three at once. The loan will be tied to the dollar at first because it is a loan that is used to buy an existing mortgage. Product 1 is a loan, offered to anyone, so as to pay off, or restructure, an existing loan, or to buy an existing home, or buy an existing business property, with the idea that the user of the new money issue will then have legal title of their own home, the land that is on their own home, and their own business property, and the land that their own business property is on, and there is no interest charged to the owner of these properties, unless the borrower has proven, beyond a shadow of doubt, to be a bad risk, and therefore a person who is not going to pay back the loan, in which case the interest charge is charged like an insurance fee, to cover the costs of having to repossess, following default. If the borrower does pay back the loan, including the added insurance payment, the borrower regains a measure of "good faith and credit" thereby reducing the cost he, or she, charged for earning a bad risk, which is now a case of earning less bad risk, and these calculations are already used to some degree within the involuntary connection. All the honest productive people are offered a no interest loan, so as to restructure their involuntary association loans, or so as to begin living in their own homes, and begin running their own businesses, if they are so inclined. That alone, that one product alone, will work to illustrate what can happen well before the new independence day, so as to be ready to make happen that which is declared to be what will happen on the new independence day July 4th 2012. You don't have to work the aggregate numbers, just know how that works for your own life, in your own time, and then times that estimate by whatever number of people will be doing the same thing. Many honest productive people will no longer be sending one extra home cost to the people running the banking extortion racket. That is not the total fix, as illustrated by Product 1 and Product 2. Product 2 ties up a few loose ends. Product 2 is the money maker for whomever volunteers to produce and maintain Product 1 and Product 2, and the design of this competitive legal money product is such that the people who do volunteer to produce and maintain Product 1 and Product 2 are legally allowed to collect 1% interest from those who have proven that they will pay back every cent borrowed. 1% of a lot of loans is a lot of power to purchase flowing to the people who volunteer to go into that business; whereby they are awarded the legal license to produce, and maintain Product 1, and Product 2. Product 2 loans are loaned out to people who pay back loans, you should know these people, they are the people who make up The Good Faith and Credit of the United States of America (LLC). Why can't they borrow from their own good faith and credit right now? The accurate answer is that the Legal Criminals have America on the Bust cycle on schedule. Product 2 loans are loaned out specifically for purchases that are currently calculated as investments whereby the return on the investment is calculated to be in excess of 1%. In other words you, and anyone with good credit, can get a Product 2 loan, for 1% interest charged to you, so long as you buy something that returns to you more than the money you borrowed, at least more than !% more than the money you borrowed, and there are many things that fall into this category of investment. Such as: 1. Solar Panels 2. Electric Cars 3. Modular Vertical Farming Green House Units 4. A Farm I know some of the numbers on the first 3, and in the case of the Solar Panel: the return on investment exceeds 100%, not just 1%. Electric cars are as easy to compute, since the prices of electric cars are market prices of all cars, including gasoline powered cars, and the price of fuel for Electric cars are 80% less than the current market prices for gasoline made with petroleum. That is also well in excess of a 1% gain on investment, and therefore well in range of qualifying for a Product 2 loan. The 3rd example addresses the following: Food industry being dependent on oil and so much land is the core issue. Food's a necessity for us, so we should aim to produce it as self-sufficiently as possible, so that no one could make us slaves because they hold the food we eat. Independent home grown food out of a Modular Vertical Farming Unit is cheaper than current food prices, and the food is higher in quality, since the growing process is isolated from most of the forces that cause food quality to go down, such as attacks by insects, for one example. I've tracked one producer of Modular Vertical Farming Units, and their hold up has obviously been the result of contact with the Legal Criminals running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, as that company of people have been starved for cash, which is a very familiar story. While that company is starved for cash there are companies that make depleted uranium projectile weapons having no such trouble, for some strange reason. A person can begin preparing for July 4th 2012, any person, in America, and by July 4th, 2012, or soon after, that person fits this bill: 1. Home mortgage costs cut in half, and instead of paying the Legal Criminals for "borrowing", the home owner pays himself back for his own damn good faith and credit. 2. A new business, such as making, installing, and maintaining Solar Panels, Modular Vertical Farming Units, or any number of new powerful competitive businesses being invented is now working for every person taking advantage of that opportunity once it is an opportunity. 3. Electric power, and transportation power costs reduced by much greater than 1% less. 4. Food costs reduced, as new independent home farmers begin to flood the market with much better food at much lower prices. You tell me why that doesn't work for you. I can't guess, without pointing out the obvious resort to deceit, threats of violence, or the firm belief in the necessity of injuring targeted innocent people. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/block/block182.html Honest Productive Americans, Coincidentally the link above mentions a choice for Vice President that isn't meant to put the vice back into Vice President, and that choice was also my choice. Here is the choice according to the link above: Karen Kwiatkowski. She is a retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel and a regular contributor to LewRockwell.com. She is currently running for the 6th District of Virginia House seat. Her place on the ticket would underscore, ever the more, that of all Republican candidates for president, Ron Paul not only receives the most donations from members of the U.S. military, he garners more from this source than all of the others put together. If her presence on the ticket will not banish forever the calumny that Dr. Paul is "weak" on defense, then nothing will. If Hillary is Obama’s VP choice in 2012, Colonel Kwiatkowski’s presence on the Paul team will help counteract that perceived benefit. However, Congressman Paul will not choose her for that reason. He will do so, if he does, because he trusts Karen Kwiatkowski to promote liberty, freedom, and constitutionalism. Can you imagine the magnificent thrashing Karen will give Hillary in a Vice-Presidential debate!?! Here is me being ahead of that curve: http://www.power-independence.com/view_topic.php?id=672&forum_id=2&page=1 At the second post I linked "VP Choice still", which is this link: http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski262.html We may safely view recent events in Egypt as a living revelation that the U.S. government stands shamefully in a nasty group of "governments," that includes the unelected and unpopular religious government of Iran, the corrupt state capitalism of China, the elected warmongerers in nationalist Israel, and many less important dictators in Africa and East Asia. The Egyptian people, on many levels, have pulled away the curtain, revealing American hypocrisy and the hard-core interests of the American ruling elite. The veteran is up to speed, and a valuable resource in the battle to avoid those things that destroy Liberty. A very good choice for VP, on many levels, and most importantly on the level whereby someone having worked in the Military lends a link when communication with the people in the Military is needed. It will be vital to the next president, assuming that the next president represents Honest Productive Americans, which include The Honest Productive Military Soldiers, of all ranks, in America, to promote the Honest ones, and demote those who have proven not to be friends of Liberty, and having the right link to the Military in the office of vice president will facilitate that goal expediently. I have yet to read the rest of the link at the top of this page, and before doing so a few thoughts on the choice for vice president is in order, offered for your consideration. The road back to Liberty, following a path from abject slavery, where we are now, back to something resembling a Republic, will be a very dangerous path, and cross hairs will likely be seeking those who are moving best on that path back to liberty, certainly a president and vice president gaining the office of the Nation State power apparatus, where the president can name anyone as a terrorist, at will, and then have that targeted individual spirited away to some dungeon, to be tortured for fun, or for confessions, or to cause a very slow and painful death. Those who are guilty of those legal crimes, have become very powerful to get to that point, where they can make torture, and mass murder legal, and get away with it for so long, and therefore they will know the score, and they will feel the heat, and they already know what must be done, and they will act upon that knowledge, and I'm not ignorant about this, and I'm not stupefied by this knowledge, and this understanding helps in the effort to choose a vice president. The vice president has to be impeccable, as a replacement in case the enemies of Liberty succeed in eliminating a president who is on the side of Liberty. The right vp is essential so as to carry the torch, and to balance the scale, and to be the president as required in this struggle, and that vice president candidate must also know the same score, the same risk, the same target placed on the same office for the same reasons. That vice president choice, that person, knows the score, read the words written, and see how those words are genuine, honest, accurate, and effective. If a president is hired for the quality of honesty, rather than for dishonesty, so must be the vice president. Yes or no? I would interview candidates for vice president and I have a go or no go rule. Does the person understand the goal; which is to remove all remnants of involuntary association from the working Democratic Federated Republic in this work to avoid the forces that destroy Liberty? If the answer is no, or I don't understand, and if after explaining, step, by step, how that road can be traversed, and the answer is still an obvious I don't understand, or no you can't do that, and there is no reasonable explanation of why that can be done that way, then I'll look for someone who can get the job done, even if they have a different method. I see no reason why, from what I know so far, that Ron Paul would not pass the same test. Ron Paul would make a very good Vice President. He is working the same goal, as far as I can tell, and he is even using a very similar, if not principally the same, path. The path, principally speaking, is to make monetary competition legal within the Federation; which is the removal of draconian laws. That is principally the same goal, and that is principally the same method, my method offers a different initial competitor to help get the ball rolling. Ron Paul offers a return to gold as the Federal governments legal money, which will certainly place a very strict, hard money, limit on Federal spending, and so long as Ron Paul keeps his promise, to remove the legal tender laws, and allow competitors in money markets to compete, so long will his method work the same as mine, as the quality of money will be forced up, by competition, and the cost of money will be forced down. A Federal government shackled with a competitive gold standard may actually become the winning competitor, and it may not, let the chips, or gold coins, fall as they may. Which money will the Federal government accept as payment of taxes? Think. Use your brain. If there is a return to a working Democratic Federated Republican form of government, a competitive, experimental form of government, by design, instead of a Nation State Dictatorial Slave State, then you have to know by which method the Federal government is financed. 1. Nation State = Taxation of individual human beings, people, such as the method of direct taxation, an involuntary income tax, payable in one, and only one single, money, and no other money, just the one monopoly money produced by the Nation State Bank. 2. Democratic Federated Republic = Sovereign and Separate State Governments pay into the voluntary association agreed upon, so as to finance the Democratic Federated Republic, an indirect tax. States pay taxes to the Federation, or Republic, not taxes payed directly by The People to the one Nation State. If Ron Paul's version of the Republic returns to a true gold standard, as I understand it to be, then the State governments will have to accumulate gold to pay into the Federation and how each State figures out how to do that is a level of competition among the Separate and Sovereign State governments. There is no Nation State reaching into the pockets of The People, that ends. Ron Paul ends that, and if you don't know yet the full measure of the threat that Ron Paul represents to the Legal Criminals this may clue you in. If each Nation State does not have the nanny state enforcing a money monopoly then any of the individuals who are The People are individuals who can invent their own forms of money, and Ron Paul's Republic will not enforce the destruction of such competition. Ron Paul will not, as far as I know, enforce a law that prevents a State government from enforcing it's own gold standard either. So in Ron Paul's Republic a State within the Republic can collect it's own gold directly from The People in that State, so one State can do that, while another State can avoid that, and that is the force of competition, this Free Market thing, at work within a Democratic Federated Republican form of government. Suppose we look ahead at this Ron Paul Republic, as far as I understand it. Let's suppose. New Jersey has to come up with gold to pay into it's membership into the Republic, and the politicians in New Jersey decide to enforce their own gold monopoly bank routine on the tax payers in New Jersey, making the tax payers pay their State taxes with gold, and only gold. What happens if New York State allows gold and silver? What happens if New Hampshire allows gold, silver, and old Federal Reserve notes, or dollars, as payments for taxes in New Hampshire? Do you get the picture? There will be a fight to enforce an exchange rate. Ron Paul knows how gold works. Gold will be much less susceptible to sudden changes in the total supply in circulation compared to the old Federal Reserve notes, which have suddenly increased by twice the amount, or halved suddenly, as those Legal Criminals manipulated that supply of legal monopoly money to cause booms and busts. If Massachusetts decides to issue it's own experimental currency, to cause a boom in Massachusetts, what prevents tax payers from leaving New York, to join in on the boom? What prevents them from leaving Massachusetts when that boom turns to bust? How do the Massachusetts governors get the gold they need to pay into the Federation? What is the exchange rate between gold and the new Massachusetts paper money? Who enforces, or determines, the exchange rate? Ron Paul get's gold as payment for taxes, from each State, or that State is guilty of not paying into the Federation. What happens, if the State governors default? Ron Paul says, you get no help from U.S., have a nice day? Will the tax payers get tired of moving, grow some balls, and begin to employ their own brains, and their own power of will, invent, produce, and maintain an accurate, powerful, high quality, and low cost money, once it is no longer against the law in Ron Paul's Republic, and will most of them decide to use gold so long as it remains to be better than the competition to date? You tell me. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, I call upon you today to inform you of something that has just crossed my desk, and I am right now in the process of picking through this data to see if there are things worth knowing within the stream of data. You can judge this as a test upon your future President of The U.S.A., whomever you get in that office. Test them. Test me. Test yourself. The link is a link to a network of people who are on a similar path as the path I choose to be on, which is the path that claims to be working toward liberty, and it will be a path that can be measured accurately as the people on that path progress along that chosen path. There is in that data, from that link, a proposed Presidential Address, which can work as a competitive example. Here is that link: http://www.yesmagazine.org/blogs/david-korten/a-presidential-declaration-of-independence-from-wall-street The title is a good one, since the thing that goes by the name Wall Street is the same thing that I call Legal Crime. I can offer as evidence to the accusation that the thing known as Legal Crime is the same thing as the thing known as Wall Street by offering two links. The next two links help identify the perpetrators of the crime that became known as World War II, and this is important, because the same Legal Crime organization, if not the same leaders of that organization, are now repeating these crimes as they work toward causing World War III. Let no one be fooled into being less than aware of the full measure of the danger ahead, involuntarily. If that is what you prefer, fool, be my guest. Two links: http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ The same organized legal crime cartel, which is accurately measurable as a legal banking monopoly, a Dollar Hegemony, have, in the past, caused World War II, and they, those people who make up Wall Street, are fixin' to do a number on us, in the form of World War III, and that is well underway, in a big way, even if you refuse to see it. So that offers a clue, or two, as to the significance of someone offering a competitive Presidential Address that proposes to go after Wall Street head-on, by disconnecting from Wall Street, which is almost the same tactic shared by me, and Ron Paul. Ron Paul's solution, and my solution, is to replace the Wall Street legal money monopoly with legal competition, for reasons that can be made clear to anyone with a working brain, whereby the brain has the capacity for sound, honest, moral judgment. Moving from that competitive Presidential Address this effort can move to the true nature of the proposed solution, looking for either monopoly (criminal) power or legal competition (liberty) power. A quote from the competitive Presidential Address: I have instructed the Secretary of the Treasury to take immediate action to assume control of the Federal Reserve and restructure it to function as an independent, but publicly transparent, federal agency accountable to the president and the Congress. The new federalized Federal Reserve will have a mandate to stabilize the money supply, contain housing and stock market bubbles, discourage speculation, and assure the availability of credit on fair and affordable terms to eligible Main Street borrowers. As President I would not say that, my proposition is spelled out as Product 1 and Product 2, which can be elaborated in great detail, but not here and now. That competitive Presidential Address addresses the Wall Street legal banking monopoly problem by retaking control of the legal banking monopoly, as far as I can tell. Further investigation may uncover useful information. Next link: http://neweconomyworkinggroup.org/visions/living-wealth-money-system That is a detailed description of money. Money is the power to purchase, to me, and if the power to purchase increases, then the quality of money increases. What is the highest quality money? Where is it? Who makes it? Can I copy it? Can we copy it? Why can't we make it? Why can't we copy the highest quality of money? Use your own brain, please. The cost of money is interest. When competition drives the quality of money up, the same force of competition drives the cost of money down, and this is easy to understand capitalist truth. Don't be fooled by the capitalist liars. Why not allow the force of competition to force the quality of money up (which is the power to purchase) while allowing the force of competition to force the cost of money down? Is that not simple? Is that not something a 3rd grader can know, and know well enough to use that vital information? Why are we cherishing our stupidity? I've looked in the mirror, you may want to do so too, before answering that vital question. The next link leads to the area that I have yet to peruse. I'll comment after that investigation. Here is the link (competitive solutions to pressing problems): http://neweconomyworkinggroup.org/visions/living-wealth-money-system/money-system-design-options Should official money originate as bank debt or direct government issue? Wow, there are a lot of vital questions, and I'm going to go directly to the last one on that list, and I can cut and paste the answer offered (once clicking on the link) - then I can offer comments. The shape and function of the money system will depend in large measure on whether it is subject to appropriate public regulation to limit the size of individual institutions, place a ceiling on interest rates, prevent fraud and deception, and support locally rooted, preferably cooperative, ownership in the social enterprise model. The results of a reckless social engineering experiment with financial system deregulation provide an unambiguous demonstration of the consequences of that path. To help the reader know the stakes here, better, I'm going to explain something, and then lead the reader to my next question: What will the best money look like once the best money is produced by whomever it is produced, and then what will the better money look like once the new money takes away market share from the best money that is no longer the best? The best money can be known, by way of explaining the worst money. Here is a very good measure, as explanation, of the worst money: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Honest productive people send their earnings to liars who use that money to make the honest productive people suffer. Thomas Paine offers an explanation of that transfer of power here: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. What is the money proposed by the people who constitute the link to that network of people who offer a competitive Presidential Address, and presumably a competitive method of disconnecting The People from Wall Street, and presumably offer a competitive money, a money that is better for The People compared to The Dollar Hegemony money? What is the money? Show me the money. I am looking. How about this: http://neweconomyworkinggroup.org/visions/living-wealth-money-system/democratizing-money The money system is properly designed and managed to serve the real wealth economy as a regulated public utility. Regulatory and tax policy properly support a system of locally rooted financial institutions, with a preference for those owned by state and local governments or organized as cooperatives or nonprofit community service institutions. These policies should further seek to render outsized banks, financial speculation, predatory lending, financial fraud, and the shadow banking system of unregulated hedge funds and private equity funds illegal and/or unprofitable. I see a need to contact these people, see if they can look ahead far enough to see the advantage of sending Ron Paul to the office of President, or sending me instead, as our power to do so exists. I have a problem right now in the measure of not finding a specific description of the money being proposed. I do see a description that appears to be a proposal to make competition in money legal, but the references to regulation confess otherwise, at the same time. Gary North helps out greatly with this specific line in the sand, where the rubber meets the road. Please consider reading the whole article: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north512.html WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? I will send that network of people a message when I can find their contact page. http://neweconomyworkinggroup.org/contact Competitive Legal Money Website feedback If a State government in the U.S.A. began legalizing their own legal money to be used by tax payers in that State to pay State taxes in that State, how would your proposed money issue regulate that legal State money, or would your proposed money issue allow the people running the State government to regulate their own money issue? I think that question is a vital question, and I'll add a link to this thread at the end of that submission to that contact web page, to offer context concerning that question. My guess is that those people in that network are offering a return to a dollar legal unit of money regulated at the National level, which is the root problem when people fail to understand the difference between a Democratic Federated Republic and a Nation State. I sen the e-mail message from that contact web page, and I'll find out if an answer is offered in return. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans, Having returned from Reno Nevada where LPAC was the event not to be missed, so I didn't miss it, but having returned I see an opportunity to relay a few messages. There are battles going on around us, as the Friends of Liberty are working to avoid the alternatives to Liberty, such as, for example, The Federal Reserve System of Extortion. One of the speakers told his assembled audience that his group was a major force behind the recent audit of The Federal Reserve Criminals, and that window into those crimes has now become a public record. Few will call it crime, unfortunately. I personally asked the speaker about that audit, my question concerned what was bought by those criminals running The Federal Reserve System. I did not explain in detail as to my way of seeing those crimes as purchases, but the question was answered, as the speaker added a vital missing factor of accounting in that audit as it was not disclosed as to the nature of the collateral involved in the transfer of very large sums of legal dollars. The audit in question involved the 2008 time period, which I confirmed with the speaker, if my question and his answer on that point was understood, and during that time period the criminals at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion doubled the supply of legal dollars. What did they buy? There is a list of loans uncovered in the audit so there is a paper trail that is public knowledge linking the people at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion with the people who received large sums of legal dollars in the form of loans. Not knowing what was legally determined to be collateral for those loans is, in fact, not knowing what was purchased with those loans as the people running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion buy something when they create double the money supply of legal dollars and then send that money to the people on that list of borrowers. A person who loans money is a person who buys a steady return of the money loaned, as the money flows back from the borrower. A person who loans money is a person who typically buys a thing called "interest"; which is then even more money flowing back to the lender from the borrower, so the lender buys that steady stream of money that must be earned by the borrower and then the borrower sends his earnings to the lender in the form of "interest". A person who loans money is a person who typically makes a legal claim on something previously owned by the borrower as the borrower signs off legal ownership of something that becomes legal "collateral". The person who loans money risks nothing when the power of law is employed to force the borrower to pay back the entire loan, the entire sum of all interest payments charged to the borrower, and/or the legal title to the thing that was once owned by the borrower; which is the thing that is designated as legal collateral. The lender may get the entire loan amount back, the entire sum of all the interest charged to the borrower, and the legal title to the collateral, when things work to the advantage of the lender, when law is used to cover up crime, and that is reality, and you may not want to admit it, for some reason. If you do not understand how that works, because it is too complicated, or because my words are too foreign, then you are not alone, since many people fall victim to versions of legal banking whereby the targeted victims fail to understand the fine print, so to speak. A person who loans money is a person who buys something with that money. Where does a person get the money they use to buy something? The people at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion create the legal money, dollars, they use to buy things. You can't. They can. You can't, because it is against the law for you to create money, you cannot legally create legal dollars, and that is a demonstrable fact. Your money, if you do create it, if you do create dollars to fill your bank account, so as to allow you to buy things with that money, even if you buy borrowers promises to pay back the money they borrow, and even if you buy interest payments paid to you, and even if you buy the things that are legally designated as collateral, even if you buy beer and lap dances with that money that you create, you will be outside the law, not inside the law, as you create money, as you create legal dollars to fill your bank account. The people at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion can, legally, fill up their empty bank accounts whenever they want with impunity; which means that they have the legal power to add zeros to their legal banking accounts, and they did so in 2008. The Federal Reserve System of Extortion people, the people running that legal crime business, created a lot of money in 2008 for a reason. Those people at that legal crime bank doubled the total number of legal dollars in 2008, and that is something that bears repeating, since the victims of that crime will bear the costs of that crime, in due time. So, to help you conceptualize the meaning of those crimes it bears repeating that there was once a total sum of legal dollars on Earth; all those legal dollars, in all those bank accounts, and in all those wallets, all over the Earth, and then a moment later the people at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion creates that same amount of legal dollars, and they create that much new money to spend, they then have as much money to spend as everyone else combined, they can spend that money on anything they want because they can double that total supply of legal dollars when they want, and they did, and then then had the entire sum of legal dollars to spend. They created and spent as many dollars as everyone else could spend if you combine everyone else together. If you combine the total amount of purchasing power held by everyone on Earth you then have the same amount of purchasing power held by the people running The Federal Reserve System of Legal Extortion. How nice is that? A. The total number of legal dollars existing on Earth before the people at The Fed double that total supply of money. B. The total number of legal dollars existing on Earth is flowing through all the transactions around the world and that same amount of money has suddenly appeared in the bank account of the people running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, and that happened in 2008. The speaker at the Liberty Political Action Conference in Reno Nevada confirmed to his audience, including me, that the people at The Federal Reserve were audited; partially. It is not known as to what was designated as capital. It is known as to where all that money went once the people at The Federal Reserve System of Extortion spent it. That money went to foreign banks and a list of legal fictions called companies, including a list of companies that may be moving to China. I cannot confirm the link between The Federal Reserve System of Extortion and the moving of capital to China. When I asked that speaker he did not agree with my effort to acknowledge the link between the people at the Federal Reserve System of Extortion and China, if such a link exists. I've read that such a link does exist, and I can find and link those sources if requested. Another speaker at the convention spoke of Global Economics, including Global Military Expenses, and I asked the following question during the time when the audience was afforded the opportunity to ask questions: If American Imperialism is not reversed will it lead eventually to war with China? The extensively credited authority on the subject to which he spoke answered reservedly, as if the possibility was remote, and he said that 30 or 40 years from now could be a time when such a thing could happen. I've just lead the interested reader, with all that text above, into a link that I'm reading this morning, and I want to share that link with The Honest Productive Americans, who are interested in knowing better, as to what lies ahead. Here is the link: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29170.htm Here is a relevant quote: We undertake an imperialist war against the country of Libya, we seek to expand the global war into Pakistan, largely in order to challenge China’s growing influence in the world, and we have set the stage for another imperialist war in Yemen. I will at this time play the part of the broken record as I link two sources of information that constitute one message. Two things combine to make one thing as follows. A. http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/ B. http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ The one thing that happened in reality, not history, it happened in reality, we see it as history, it happened, and it was World War II. The speaker at the Reno LPAC event said to his audience that China does not plan on going to war, as part of his answer to my question. Who decides what China does? Will the people who decide what China does tell anyone what they are going to do, and will they tell the truth? If the people who run China include a Chinese type of Neo-Con group, such as our home grown version, here in America, and if that group plans on going to war with anyone, anytime soon, will they announce their plans publicly, well in advance as they advance toward that goal, so as to give all those people who may be victimized by that plan fair warning? A World War is set up to happen when more than two sides are armed and ready for battle against each other, such as the case with World War II. England, America, France, Japan, Germany, Poland, Russia, to name a few. All sides are armed and ready to go into battle when the time is ripe, and then an incident is concocted, and then the stuff hits the fan, including the fan known as a nuclear bomb. The stuff hitting the fan will be arms, legs, heads, and people stuff. The fan that the people stuff will be hitting is built for a reason and the reason is simple. Those who gain power over other people must use the power they steal in the work of making sure that the victims are not allowed to grow powerful enough to avoid victimization. That is simple, and if you can't understand that, because that is not simple enough for you, then you have at least uncovered a serous problem, a serious lack of power, and without that power to know simple things you are defenseless or worse. What is worse than being defenseless? If you provide the means by which you suffer then that is a condition that is worse than being defenseless. If you don't have the power to know simple cause and effect realities, and that is a measure of your lack of power to defend yourself, then that is bad, but it can be worse, and it is worse when you are actually working harder, and harder, and harder, so that your enemies grow stronger, and stronger, and stronger. I'm not here to tell you that the Chinese are your enemies, not at all, I'm here to tell you that whomever is financing the flow of power that is arming many people in preparation for another global war can stop financing those purchases of those things that cause those wars to happen on those schedules. Stop paying for it, and it will stop. How simple can it get? How powerless do you want to become? How powerless are you? If you have no power, who is paying those taxes? It is now early on the morning of September 21, 2011, and I have some good news to report concerning the Ron Paul for President campaign, and a few other things to report, as time goes by, but I want to remind, or inform any readers that I have started my own schedule that marches all who participate in the effort to a new Liberty Day. Why not? I picked July 4th 2012. There are many ways in which we can reach our goal on that day. Reaching our goal won't happen by accident. My reports will continue when I can afford the opportunity. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Honest Productive Americans. I found a report written by someone whereby the subject has to do with exponential economic growth rates. I find this subject very interesting because of the consequences associated with failing to know better. Failing to know better than to believe in a lie is inevitably very destructive to whomever is failing to know better. An example: Person A in charge of Group A starts World War III, failing to know better, and the result is World War III and human extinction. Suppose that the above does happen, and suppose it is then known by the last of the people who are slowly dying, as the human species dies a miserable death, and looking back, during those days when the human experiment breaths it's last breaths, if only we could have known better, we would not have allowed that to happen the way it did happen, too bad for us. In that context I offer one link first, then three more links to have before us as we work on these competitive viewpoints. http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=215521.0 That first link includes an offering on exponential growth rates, and I can sum up the significant points. A. The number of people stupefied by the lies can grow exponentially. B. The number of people knowing better can grow exponentially. C. The number of power sources can be used to make the number of power sources grow exponentially, and that can be exemplified with Solar Panels. D. The number of people stupefied by lies can grow exponentially while the number of people knowing better die off exponentially while the number of people reach a number that is no longer able to support life on earth as a result of both stupidity and scarce power sources. Of those 4 scenarios above I like B since B offers the Human Species the best odds of surviving past the life span of this Solar System, which can be a very long time, many centuries into the foreseeable human future. Let me put that in context, please, for your careful judgement. A. The length of time that human beings exist if human beings cannot travel to another Solar System. B. The length of time that human begins exist past the life span of this Solar System because human begins gain the power to travel to other Solar Systems. The above laundry list of two time frames are significant because one, or A, is very small, finite, compared to the later, or B, which is incalculable at this time. Some of us, some of our species may, report facts that prove that our species will not, ever, reach out to other Solar Systems. I won't do that, since my power to see into the future is very limited, and I know better than to claim facts about things that I cannot know. Moving onto the next link, please, consider reading it, and I'm going to take out one quote, because one quote concerns me much more than all the other messages in this link: http://gigaom.com/cleantech/an-exercise-in-galactic-scale-energy/ Growth is then the basis for interest rates, loans and the finance industry. For your consideration: Legal crime is the basis for interest rates, loans, and the finance industry. To claim otherwise is to be stupefied like so many of the current examples of human beings roaming the planet earth. Were it not for the stupefied people sending their hard earned power to the few people who make everyone suffer, through "interest", "loans", and "the finance industry", plus involuntary taxes that are not as covert, if not for them, what would the subject of "growth" be, if not for that steady misuse of power? Please compare: 1A. Growth is then the basis for interest rates, loans and the finance industry. 2B. Legal crime is the basis for interest rates, loans, and the finance industry. 2A. War is good for the economy. 2B. Legal Crime (aggressive wars for profit) transfers power from the stupefied people to the Legal Criminals faster than any other covert tax. See, please see, how language can work against us, and language can work for us, as we either continue to provide the means by which we suffer or we employ a better idea, since we know better. The link that reported the lie that "growth is then the basis for interest rates..." etc. also reports an angle of view concerning the relationship between the number of human beings and the requirements of power needed to sustain human life as the number of human beings increases. The story is an old one; in modern times the story changed a little, but it is essentially the same old story. Fear. Fear so as to be weak from that fear. Fear to a point of weakness by which the victims of fear will transfer the power they need to defend themselves to people who will make the fearful victims suffer. A. Overpopulation B. Global Warming C. Terrorism D. Savages E. Evil Dictators The story is always told in such a way as to accomplish the goal intended to be accomplished by the story. Fear Obey There is no choice. There is no other way. I'm here to help. You may prefer to be helped by those who make you suffer. Send them more of the power you need to defend yourself, to reproduce, and to keep the human species alive another day, or week, or year, or century. Sign onto the lies. Read from the scripted story line that is offered to you in so many forms. You can think your way out of this paper bag, and perhaps all you need to get on that path is someone offering you a badge, a license, and the authority to do so, and I'm going to help you find that authority. Get up, go to the mirror, look in the mirror, and see your boss. Ask your boss in the mirror if you can go ahead and think your own way out of this paper bag where we are being told that there is no other choice but the choices dictated to us by these many stupefied victims. Let me know if you can see a way out of this paper bag; while I offer my version. Another link: http://www.susps.org/overview/birthrates.html U.S. fertility first dropped to less than replacement level fertility in 1972, and by 2002 had dropped to a record low. (Replacement level fertility is 2.1 children per woman because of infant mortality - see terms). During most of the 1970s and 1980s women gave birth to fewer than 2 children on average, a rate insufficient to replace the population. Because of population momentum, U.S. population would have increased to 255 million by 2020 and then gradually declined. My wife and I reproduced, she reproduced, being the woman, and now there is one to replace me, and one to replace my wife. That is a personal census offered as a real life measure of things, not just numbers. If it is true that there is such a thing as overpopulation, even while replacement levels of reproduction is not being met, then there can be ways of measuring exactly what is meant by the term "overpopulation". Use your own brain, please. What does the term mean? What does it mean to you when you hear the word "overpopulation"? Is it possible that the term "overpopulation" is just another story offered to the victims by the Legal Criminals so as to trick the victims into being fearful enough to then be weak, and to then volunteer to be even weaker, as the victims are ordered to send even more power to the Legal Criminals? I've read a few books with titles like: "You are being lied to." I didn't have to read such a book to know that fact. What lies are the most important lies? A. Lies that result in the extinction of the human species. B. Lies that result in a momentary embarrassment for the victims of the lie, the one who was led to believe that the lie was true, when the lie is demonstrably false. When the communication you read leads you to believe that there is something to fear, and therefore there is a need to send someone more money, then it may be a good idea to question the validity of that communication. When the communication speaks about overpopulation while the same communication offers information that claims that the birth rate is below a sustainable level, then you have before you a demonstrable contradiction. What is overpopulation? I can offer an explanation. When the Legal Criminals reach a point where their numbers are too many, and their victims numbers are too few, take a guess as to the methods used by the Legal Criminals to fix that problem? How about an illustration? You are on a boat in open water like the historical example provided by a book titled Men against the Sea, where the actual event involved a Ship Captain named William Bligh whose ship was seized by some of the crew and his group of loyal followers were cast into open water in a row boat. Now suppose that there is in that boat 2 separate groups, not one, not one group where each member of the group cooperates with each other so as to survive under horrible circumstances. Suppose, instead of harmonious co-existence, there are two groups fighting each other, in that one boat, in open water. One group takes all the power while the other group is forced to work to death, and suppose that there are a total of 10 people in the boat, and suppose that half of the number of people in the boat are dictators and the other half are subjects, or half are slave masters, and the other half are slaves, or half are Legal Criminals (because they elected themselves to be legal authorities), and the other half are stupefied believers in the lie of Legal Crime. 10 total people 1 boat Open water in the middle of a huge ocean far from any land. 5 people take everything 5 people work to death so as to give everything to the 5 people who take everything (because they are stupefied) Time goes by in this illustration and suppose one of the stupefied people die from too much work and not enough, or no, food, or water, and suppose one of the elite dies too, from lack of exercise and gout, and now there are 8 total, and the ratio is still 1 to 1. Suppose, over night, two more of the hard working stupefied tax payers croak, and the remaining 4 elite tax collectors wake up to find only 2 workers left in the boat, and both of them are working very hard to keep the boat afloat, and one is preparing a fish caught in the night, and it is a small fish, and the small fish will only feed one person well, only enough to make one person full of good food. There you have, now, an illustration of the problem. Place yourself in the shoes of each of those remaining 6 people and figure it out for yourself. The liars running the show will have to invent really, really, really, good lies to remain elite, full of good food, and very happy, at the expense of their stupefied victims, including some of their fellow elitists who may be a little more gullible than the other fellow elitists. How does that make sense? Please return to this: Growth is then the basis for interest rates, loans and the finance industry. Really? Consider reading something called "The Parasite City" written by a person who walked the earth during a very pivotal time period in human history during the time when ideas like voluntary socialism was in direct competition with voluntary capitalism, before both socialism and capitalism became lies covering up Legal Crimes. Here is that link (look for The Parasite City if you can't afford to read the whole work): http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm#4 Ask yourself why, please, why, why, why, are people stuck on using The Dollar as currency, as if there is no other, better, option? In context, with the scientific studies on "energy" consumption rates, I offer a closing statement. When power is used to make more power then power supplies will grow at an exponential rate; and power can be stored moving sea water onto mountain tops. If the Egyptians can make pyramids, why can't we make it to another Solar System before our species ends? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Ask the Candidates +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ –Question 1: Background: The aims of U.S. foreign policy in the post-World War II period were essentially to enforce a global system in which the Western powers under American leadership would maintain global dominance. This essentially meant being in control of the world’s resources at the expense of non-Western nations. This fundamental objective of U.S. foreign policy in the post-war period shines through with bare-knuckled candor in a TOP SECRET policy document written by George Kennan in February 1948. He was head of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff, and this was its first memorandum. Here is an excerpt: “We have about 50 per cent of the world’s wealth, but only 6.3 per cent of its population. … Our real task in the coming period is to maintain this position of disparity. … To do so we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming. … We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford the luxury of altruism. … We should cease to talk about vague, unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we will have to deal in straight power concepts.” Lead-in: Five years after approval of the basic policy aim of controlling more than our share of “the world’s wealth,” the policy was implemented by throwing millions of dollars at the CIA to overthrow the democratically elected leader of Iran. You see, Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh had the revolutionary, unacceptable notion that more of the profits from Iranian oil should stay in Iran for the Iranian people and not simply go to oil giants like the predecessor of British Petroleum (BP). The Question: Do you think we had a right to overthrow the leader of Iran in 1953? And would you again give millions of dollars to the CIA to overthrow the Iranian government under your presidency? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Answer: We have no collective right, that is a very big lie, a very effective method of turning Honest Productive People into accessories to legalized crime; just as the Nazi propaganda had done in it's time - big lies for big crimes. The total for the German form of Legal Crime was roughly 6 million legally murdered and tortured. A bigger lie was used in Russia, by Stalin, and all the accessories to those crimes, there, where the total was roughly 20 million. There is no such thing as a collective right. There is a collective power, as all the people who are made to believe in the big lie send their hard earned surplus wealth to one big pot of wealth, which is power, and then someone, or some group, spend that power. When they spend that power they spend it on whatever works to keep the power flowing to them, they are not shackled down by any chains of morality, or right, or anything whatsoever, other than a greater power, such as the power that can be collected among an informed populace. It is past time to stop believing in these lies, and to stop providing the means by which we suffer, sending our hard earned power to criminals so that they can pass laws that allow them to perpetually commit crimes upon us. Well past time to stop lying to ourselves, as you are doing with this loaded question. Please stop the bullshit - it is worse than being counter-productive. It is downright destructive in nature. Lies are meant to injure. What volunteer to be injured - why read from the false script? Next question. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ –Question 2 Background: Further on Iran: During the Dec. 5, 2006, Senate hearing on the nomination of Robert Gates to be Secretary of Defense, he was questioned by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., about the possibility of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and the threat to Israel if it did. Gates said that he believed Iran was trying to acquire nuclear weapons and was lying when it said it wasn’t. However, amazingly, Gates added that Iran’s motivation was largely self-defense. Sen. Graham asked: “Do you believe the Iranians would consider using that nuclear weapons capability against the nation of Israel?” Gates replied: “I don’t know that they would do that, Senator. … And I think that, while they are certainly pressing, in my opinion, for nuclear capability, I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons: Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west and us in the Persian Gulf.” This remarkably candid reply explains Iran’s possible motive in seeking nuclear weapons as deterrence against aggression by nuclear powers in the region, including Israel and the United States. In other words, according to Gates, Iran is seeking nuclear weapons to prevent others from attacking it, rather than to attack other states — like Israel. This comes close to saying that the U.S. should be able to live with a nuclear-armed Iran (and Israel should be able to as well). And, remember, all this talk is properly put in the subjunctive mood. It remains a very big IF; namely, on whether or not the Iranian leaders opt to go for a nuclear weapon. We were formally reminded last March that the jury is still out on this key question. James R. Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, testified to Congress that the intelligence community judges that Iran has not yet made that decision. So, despite all the current media hype regarding Iran’s nuclear program, there remains some reason to hope against hype, so to speak. In the above reply, Gates also acknowledged what U.S. officials officially seek to obfuscate: that Israel has nuclear weapons. Remember, that at the time of his confirmation hearing, Gates had already served as CIA director and held other senior national security position in several administrations. He had been around long enough both to know the details of Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal and the longstanding U.S. policy NOT to acknowledge that Israel has nukes. That policy was designed to have the double benefit of not undermining Israel’s policy of studied ambiguity on the issue and of not requiring the U.S. to take a position for or against Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons and its refusal to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Iran has signed. America’s supposedly “objective” FCM also readily puts on the blinders when focusing on Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program and simultaneously ignoring Israel’s real one. The truth is that there are no U.N. weapons inspectors crawling into crevices in Israel, as they regularly do in Iran. Lead-in to question: A portion of intelligence funding goes to support intelligence analysis. Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates worked in the analysis part of the CIA. [Actually, as an apprentice analyst 40 years ago, he worked in the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch that I led. His portfolio was Soviet policy toward the Middle East.] Fast-forward 35 years to Dec. 5, 2006, when the Senate held a one-day hearing on Gates’s nomination to become Secretary of Defense. When Sen. Lindsey Graham asked Gates whether he thought the Iranians would consider a nuclear attack on Israel, Gates answered: “I think that they would see it in the first instance as a deterrent. They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons: Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west and us in the Persian Gulf.” This is tell-it-like-it-is intelligence analysis [which exceeded my hopes as his erstwhile mentor]. It even included matter-of-fact mention of Israel’s nuclear capability, which President Barack Obama himself has refused to acknowledge. When Helen Thomas pressed the issue at Obama’s inaugural press conference (Feb. 9, 2009), the President awkwardly ducked the question, explaining he did not want to “speculate.” The Question: Do you agree with Mr. Gates that Iran would see a nuclear capability “in the first instance as a deterrent?” And how many nuclear weapons do Western experts believe Israel has? President Carter has said 150, but that was some time ago. A Follow-up: Let’s assume Iran does get a nuclear weapon: Do you think it would commit suicide by firing it off in the direction of Israel? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Answer: More loaded questions. To presuppose that there is an entity that can act as one and at that same time that one entity is every person living in one area, such as Israel, or U.S.A., or Iran, is a big lie, a very big subliminal, unconscious, lie. One that big lie is exposed, and discarded, the question then becomes a simple power struggle concerning specific people who have names, and these specific people with names live on Earth, and they walk, and they talk, and they wear clothes, and they control such things as weapons of mass destruction. Who gave them the power to control weapons of mass destruction? Who would be so stupid as to give anyone, ever, a weapon of mass destruction? The answer is easy to see, and the answer is that no reasonable, honest, productive person would give a weapon of mass destruction to anyone were it in their power to do so, and therefore it can be known, by anyone with a brain, that the people who have control of these things are unreasonable, and they took these things, they had to have committed serious crimes against humanity to build these things, they are criminals, they have names, they live on Earth, and if their potential victims are ever going to avoid being victims the control over these things will be removed. These things will be removed, and disarmed, and they will never be produce again, or else. If you don't like the truth, that is your problem, not mine. The truth is what it is, a weapon of mass production. Lies are weapons of mass destruction - particularly these lies that presume absurdities such as the legitimacy of creating, maintaining, and the employing weapons of mass destruction - supposedly: "for their own good". Whose own good? Why do you read from the false script - whose paying you - how do you profit by such destructive behavior? Next question: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ –Question 3 Background and Lead-In: This question deals with torture, an issue that has been given new life recently, with more and more Republican presidential candidates speaking in favor of it. We have surely come a long way since Virginia patriot Patrick Henry insisted passionately that “the rack and the screw,” as he put it, were barbaric practices that had to be left behind in the Old World, or we are “lost and undone.” The Question: On Sept. 6, 2006, Gen. John Kimmons, then head of Army intelligence told reporters at the Pentagon, in unmistakable language: “No good intelligence is going to come from abusive practices. I think history tells us that. I think the empirical evidence of the last five years, hard years, tells us that.” Gen. Kimmons knew that President George W. Bush had decided to claim publicly, just two hours later, that the “alternative set of procedures” for interrogation — methods that Bush had approved, like water-boarding — were effective. Whom do you think we should believe: President Bush? Or Gen. Kimmons? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Answer: With almost no exceptions the people who have stolen offices of the supposed government can be trusted to lie, they are hired to lie, that is their job. I know that George Bush lied, that is his job, what does that have to do with belief? Patrick Henry blew the whistle on The Constitution, it was a usurpation from a working Democratic Federated Republic under The Articles of Confederation into a working Despotism (Legal Crime). There were, perhaps, more exceptions to the rule (Legal Criminals Lie) back in Patrick Henry's day compared to today. Listening to, and heeding the warnings of, representatives who are hired to speak the truth has been effectively made unlawful, see, for example, the 16th Amendment concerning what cannot be questioned. |
|||||||||||
