| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
|||||||||||||
| Summit | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri May 29th, 2009 01:51 pm |
|
101st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://mises.org/story/3425
All of them? Does that author realize the irony of that statement? That development seems to have risen from this little-understood and dangerously deceptive arrangement: two groups of persons with entirely different motives may sometimes find themselves allied in what appears to be a common cause. Same author quoting a sentence that applies well to the supposed "Federalists" fighting the supposed "Anti-Federalists" during the usurpation of Liberty by The Constitution supporters (The Nationalists who provided the false and misleading labels).
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun May 31st, 2009 12:08 pm |
|
102nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/schmidt/schmidt17-2.html
I had asked the question on the power of the network (path of least resistance) to the Austrians (so called economists) back in 1996. I agree with that answer. http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=163 That link records thoughts on "the path of least resistance" effect, where routers find ways around blockades.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 11:59 am |
|
103rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo172.html
Anyone, Why are these messages written in code? Why must there be such a huge gap between the words and the meaning behind the words? If the idea is to accurately identify specific people who plan on and follow through with the plan to injure innocent people; then why not call that what it is – in fact? What is the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals? A. Defensive government B. Accurate perception employed in defence against victimization C. A recruitment tool Once the idea bears fruit, where the accurate perception tool is employed toward identifying legal criminals, where the people who are guilty of pre-meditated destruction of innocent life are known, then does the idea become a form of “The British are Coming” where Paul Revere spreads the word? If the idea is to accurately know who intends to injure innocent people, for profit, or just for fun, and that same idea is then moved into an advertisement phase, where the idea becomes a warning of some sort, let all the innocent people beware, then why does the warning have to be couched in these mysterious terms? Here is the quote again: Together, they wrecked much of the world economy because of their shared "fatal conceit" (F.A. Hayek’s term) that government central planners were superior to private property and free markets. “Government Central Planners”, “Property” and “Free Markets”. The bad guys appear to be those evil government central planners. Now, please, what is the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals? Who are the bad guys? Who has the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals? Here is a guy, this Tom guy, and he has this idea where the idea is to accurately identify “Government Central Planners” – is this true? What is Tom doing? He, if I may answer my own question, is planning on doing something. He must have planned on writing those words – no? Is Tom centrally located? Is Tom a Central Planner? Why has Tom governed his word choices so as to misidentify the legal criminals as being “Government Central Planners”? Why blame “government” for actions of human beings? What is the plan behind this governing of words so as to mislead, misidentify, disguise, deceive, miss-communicate, and falsely propagate falsehood? I have to say, to any reader, that I have a whole lot in common with this Tom guy, more than I have in common with most everyone else, however, please, see the diversions. Why is “property” being communicated in such a way as to suggest that “private property” represents “the good guys”? Why do people plan on and then execute their plans to suggest that “property” is good, bad, or even indifferent? What is the reasoning for introducing this idea of “property” as if “property” were capable of thought and or action? Example: Suppose a robot was constructed where the robot has a program built into the robot and the robot will torture and mass murder millions of people if some person turns the robot on. Please think about that above example as an illustration of why I think Tom is spreading a whole lot of false propaganda, as Tom becomes a “Government Central Planner” in that effort to spread that specific false propaganda concerning this supposed “private property” stuff. P.S. I wrote an e-mail to Tom (a plan of mine to warn Tom about the things I publish in reference to what Tom publishes) Last edited on Fri Jun 12th, 2009 12:02 pm by Joe Kelley |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jul 13th, 2009 07:30 am |
|
104th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/06/disruptive-by-design-wired-editor-in-chief-chris-anderson-discusses-the-future-of-free/ Free as a marketing strategy.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 10th, 2009 01:33 am |
|
105th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23923.htm Lies, War, and Empire By Dr. Michael Parenti
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Dec 25th, 2009 10:07 am |
|
106th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24255.htm By Noam Chomsky America is not a democracy, nor was it intended to be.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 26th, 2009 12:32 pm |
|
107th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard159.html Rothbard ignores the work of Josiah Warren and Stephen Pearl Andrews, and Rothbard misrepresents the work of Benjamin Tucker. Spooner's "A New System of Paper Currency" is also misrepresented, indirectly by Rothbard. The things ignored by Rothbard just happen to be the things that compete with his Interest/Profit/Wage Paying System. Why does Rothbard ignore the competition? Why does Rothbard misrepresent the competition, does Rothbard intend to destroy competition? Is competition in Rothbard's way, impeding the power accumulation intended with his Interest/Profit/Wage Paying System of wealth accumulation?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 29th, 2009 11:27 am |
|
108th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/ostrowski/ostrowski95.1.html
Ahhh...the failed noble experiment hypothesis - false. The architects of U.S.A. inc (Limited) included people like Robert Morris and Alexander Hamilton, two “Nationalists” (Legal criminals) hiding behind a false front called: “Federalists”, and their goal has been achieved – in spades – where the idea was, and is, to transfer POWER from those who earn it to those who produce and maintain the “monopoly” and their tool is legal tender; a money monopoly.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 23rd, 2010 07:58 am |
|
109th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
No other time in human history comes close to the present. Certainly, if these risks are not understood by those who make decisions in the heights of the immense power that science and technology have placed in their hands, the next world war will be the last one, and it would take, perhaps, tens of millions of years before new intelligent beings would attempt to write their history. The Global Warming scenario on steroids, and a rapidly accelerating rate of acceleration for the winner in the race to DOOM DAY.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Feb 16th, 2011 10:18 am |
|
110th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Economic Hit Man meets Lew Rockwell
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Mar 1st, 2011 11:13 am |
|
111th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
ChindiaDr Buiter’s team adds the usual caveats: “beware of compound growth rate delusions;” or “the bigger the booms, the more spectacular the bubbles, and the devastating the busts;” or indeed that “convergence is neither automatic, nor inevitable. In history, it has been more the exception than the rule.” Anyone, What is meant by "convergence" as in: "convergence is neither automatic, nor inevitable."? Please, don't be shy.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 12:22 pm | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Summit | Top |
