| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Why not? I have yet to ask my wife if she will support such a thing. This is a primary thing to do i.e. throw my hat into the ring. Call this a market survey. If no one supports my candidacy, then, I won't have to suffer all the things that presidential candidates have to suffer - never mind the actual costs involved with executing the executive office. So here it is and to anyone with similar leanings by all means do throw your hat in too. Imagine doing the job in a more harmful way? That is nearly unimaginable. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17129.htm Issue number one: As president will you attack another country soon? Answer: No Unprovoked violence that results in loss of human life is called murder by any known civilized standard so the question is: As president will you murder? Answer: No Additionally: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=China+Russia+Iran+allies+military+capability The notion of invincibility or perhaps the ability to murder with impunity is ridiculous. The victims of murder will eventually inspire loved ones to defend themselves effectively. Given what is at stake, it is easy to see why the United States, Russia, and China all have such an abiding interest in the outcome of the Iranian crisis. For Washington, the replacement of the clerical government in Tehran with a U.S.-friendly regime would represent a colossal, threefold accomplishment: It would eliminate a major threat to America's continued dominance of the Persian Gulf, open up the world's number two oil-and-gas supplier to American energy firms, and greatly diminish Chinese and Russian influence in the greater Gulf region. Not surprisingly, Moscow and Beijing are doing everything in their power to prevent any American geopolitical triumph in Iran or Central Asia from occurring, though without provoking an outright breach in relations with Washington -- and so endangering complex economic ties with the United States. Skip to this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Chinese+military+might Pick one. I pick the second one: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/12/18/130057.shtml How about this one: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/DG18Ad02.html Can they do it? How about this search: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Chinese+military+technology+capability Intelligence ? http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD20Ad03.html That looks like 'intelligence'. As the aircraft carrier battle groups advance, China draws out one of its "trump cards" by leaking to the world media that it is dumping its holdings of US Treasury bonds and shifting to gold and euros. Meanwhile, strategic planners at NORAD watch with glee as they observe on the screen as monitored by their radar satellites that Chinese surface ships are making a hasty retreat as nine allied carrier battle groups advance toward the Philippine Sea and Chinese waters near Taiwan. The answer is no on moral grounds and no on practical grounds. The answer is only yes only if the idea is to destroy the American Dream and as many innocent people as possible just for fun. A campaign slogan: Anyone can do better than a psychopath. http://www.lewrockwell.com/margolis/margolis69.html North Korea is notorious for backing away from deals, and, claims the US, has violated numerous previous ones. The latest agreement, trumpeted by the Bush Administration as a great diplomatic victory, was really due to China’s intervention. Whether it holds up and advances, or Kim is just buying more time, remains to be seen. What really worries them, of course, is that direct talks with North Korea raise the obvious question: why not direct talks with Iran over its so far peaceful nuclear program? The neocons want war with Iran, not talks, so the example of North Korea is undermining their carefully developed strategy. February 20, 2007 Eric Margolis Last edited on Wed Feb 21st, 2007 12:10 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
What will you do to ensure domestic financial solvency since you are not willing to go abroad and murder for currency and the oil that backs up 'dollar hegemony'? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/02/19/ccview19.xml The dollar will devalue further no matter what happens so it is best to invest in some other form of currency sooner rather than later. Anyone can and will sell off their depreciating dollars for something better when the need arises so the question becomes the same old question where can anyone get the most bang for the buck? Imagine spending the entire Iran war budget (and the Iraq budget) on nothing but Solar Panels to be used on all the federal buildings. Now - that is a ridiculous thing to do, I know, and you probably know too, because all those federal buildings have to be sold off for debt payments to foreign nations. That will happen as foreclosure or as a 'fire sale' once the dollar value plummets. Again – the crash will occur so the best bang for the buck must be invested sooner rather than later. As president the second thing to do is to stop borrowing the money used for the war that was stopped in the first place. People can either pay the higher costs of gasoline or start demanding cheaper solar panels and electric cars and then those solar panels and electric cars will be built because there is a demand for cheaper solar panels and electric cars. Ask yourself: How much of your tax dollars are going to oil and auto companies now and thereby ensuring the dependency upon oil? As president I know how necessary a viable currency is to modern civilization so, as president, I would, at least, put pressure on congress to get rid of the Federal Reserve and the IRS. I could completely stop any new legislation forcing congress into the required ‘consensus’ or super majority to pass any presidential veto. Can anyone seriously imagine congress becoming united to save The Federal Reserve and the IRS? Next I’ll map out my plan to have the FBI investigate the CIA and visa versa with the power to bring each other into criminal court or combine their efforts to eliminate any criminal activities being conducted by ‘off the books’ U.S. government sanctioned crimes. I think such public pressure could result in a new type of America’s most wanted T.V. show. That’s it – the America’s most wanted plan. Do we really want to be borrowing money to go around torturing and murdering people? If not, then, this will end those crimes. The last one’s standing in that shrinking budget expense can eventually be fired for nothing better to do and the States can take care of their own police work. The Federal Government can concentrate on Federal Government ‘internal affairs’ first and then be in a position to ‘export’ democratic leadership. The Federal Government can be so limited as to ensure domestic tranquility by waging a war in falsehood at home. Out with the liars and see if anyone is left to ‘govern’. If not, then, the people will have to start electing honest people once in awhile. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17145.htm The above is worth reading and so I will read it. I can tell right away that this type of 'dooms day' communication misses the mark by a wide margin i.e. it is less than half true. To offer a measure of perspective concerning my claim of 'deception' above please consider diving into the following accounting. http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=364 The link above documents a time when I began another run for the congressional seat for my district based upon "NEWS" called "Peak Oil". The "News" is half true at best so my dire need to do something (run for office) evaporated with the exposure of accurate data. Future human existence can be made horrible as the ENERGY supply lowers. The Sun supplies enough energy for human civilization. That is fact. The 'dooms day' machine likes to predict dooms day because that tactic nets a profit. In simple economic terms; selling short based upon insider trading. Rather than conducting a market survey the idea is to steer the market into a state of scarcity and then profit on hedging bets or in Craps it is 'betting on the don't pass line'. I'll read the first link shortly and I will return here to retract or adjust some of my current communications if things turn out different than expected. If there is going to be a depression or recession it will be a result of actions intending that very end. The people who pay the cost will be the people who have invested poorly. An example will be a person who invests in anything that cannot be readily converted away from the U.S. dollar. Those people include people with 401K retirement accounts and that is one example. On the other hand: people who invest in alternate energy production will not be in as dire straights when the dollar value plummets. Imagine for example a person who didn’t sink their extra earnings into a 401K plan and instead the wise investor bought Solar Panels. By comparison the 401K investor has x amount of something while the Solar Panel investor has a steady flow of electricity. If the 401K investor has a steady flow of ‘interest’, the, the same amount of investment in Solar Panels creates a steady flow of electricity. If the 401K plan ‘investor’ gains ‘interest’ on his ‘interest’, then, the Solar Panel investor gains more solar panels, more efficient electric appliances, a Solar Powered Car (too bad these are not being mass produced and therefore very cheap = see “Who Stole the Electric Car”), and perhaps hydrogen production to replace the natural gas bill (costs). So…what happens when the dollar crashes? Mr. 401K has to sell off his plan before the dollar value reaches zero and he must pay all the associated penalties, IF, the Bank (that is no longer in business) agrees to process the paper work. Mr. Solar Panel/Solar car can start a taxi service and his fuel is provided by his Banker that rises up every day and sets every night just like clockwork only more dependable. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
My writing is not limited to this forum: http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=9890 P.S. The oil reserves of Venezuela is worth approximately 15 (fifteen) trillion dollars! [A.R.] Armando, If the “War on Terrorism” doesn’t ignite a major release of “nukular” fallout, then, that whole unfortunate diversion from the human race’s actual problems may soon be ‘superfluous’ and the sooner the better since there is much more money in the SUN! What is the SUN worth? Again – take that 15 trillion dollars worth of oil and make ONLY Solar Panels, Solar Panel research, and Electric Cars. This is merely an exercise in general economic theory. Suppose, then, that the whole 15 trillion was spent on Solar Panels and electric cars and Chavez inspired this to happen without shooting or torturing people. A. Is that enough investment to totally convert Venezuela where every household is completely independent from oil? B. I that enough investment to convert Venezuela and Brazil? C. Is that enough investment to convert Venezuela Brazil, New York City, and London? D. Is that enough investment to convert Venezuela, Brazil, New York City, London, and all of China? How about B above: the oil is gone but every citizen in Venezuela and Brazil are independent from oil. What does that mean? I’ve run the numbers myself concerning how much bang for the buck is produced when exchanging existing power for the power to turn sunlight into electric power and I’ve come up with a conservative 200%. Can we imagine (if not actually calculate) that the bang for the buck is at least 100%? 15 Trillion dollars worth is invested into Venezuela and Brazil so…30 Trillion comes back out. Here is the kicker: 30 Trillion was not available on the planet Earth before the investment. 15 Trillion cost was spent with the oil into making the Solar Panels and the electric cars. 15 Trillion (very conservative estimate when considering the savings that can be realized when Solar Panels and Electric Cars are mass produced and therefore utilize the savings of economies of scale) is now flowing from the sun to the earth as productive power i.e. lighting houses, cooking food, heating homes, and supplying the fuel to drive people and supplies from place to place. Now the 15 Trillion can be spent frivolously or it can be re-invested into new and better solar energy conversion devices and that is the point. Solar power, unlike oil power, is limitless. Once the infrastructure is in place the cost of power will steadily decline and economically speaking the world’s purchasing power will increase exponentially. Think in terms of Jobs. How many people convert from producing television sets to producing Solar panels? How many people convert from unemployment to producing electric cars, home heating units, etc.? Also think in terms of the pre-oil world economy and the post oil world economy. Now think in terms of the pre-solar and the post-solar economy? The pre-oil economy was poor in contrast because much of the human toil is replaced by oil-power. Oil is dirty and expensive to extract, control, and distribute. Oil is also a central power accelerator i.e. the flow of wealth goes to the oil companies. Solar power is a central power inhibitor i.e. the flow of wealth goes to the individual units that convert solar power to electric power (unless someone taxes solar electricity production). Solar power is anathema to capitalism which is based upon scarcity. Solar power is abundant. Note: The flow of oil is being stopped by the capitalists in order to raise the price (and therefore the profits) on oil. The flow of power from the sun can be stopped. It is called “Nukular” winter. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Poll: Who will you vote for in 2008 View Results Poll: Is the lesser of two evils - evil? View Results Last edited on Sat Feb 24th, 2007 05:20 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17154.htm "Theater Iran Near Term" (TIRANNT) By Michel Chossudovsky 02/23/07 "Global Research" - DUBAI, UAE, 21 February 2007. (revised 23 Feb 2007). Code named by US military planners as TIRANNT, "Theater Iran Near Term" has identified several thousand targets inside Iran as part of a "Shock and Awe" Blitzkrieg, which is now in its final planning stages. The 2003 decision to target Iran under TIRANNT should come as no surprise. It is part of the broader military roadmap. Already during the Clinton administration, US Central Command (USCENTCOM) had formulated in 1995 "in war theater plans" to invade first Iraq and then Iran.
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Clearly, the neo cons and hawkish generals have set the United States on a collision course not only with China and Russia, but, indeed, with every nation that has legitimate scientific and economic interests in space http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17162.htm The enemy of human life is emboldened to continue destroying human life when good people do nothing to stop them. At least know more than nothing about our precious future. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17210.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17215.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.sobran.com/columns/2007/070212.shtmlMeanwhile, Barack Obama has made it official: He’s running for president. He made the announcement in Springfield, Illinois, where Abraham Lincoln once kicked off his campaign, just before Lincoln’s birthday. Taking the bull by the horns, Obama proclaimed his faith in “the basic decency of the American people.” He offered no evidence to support this bizarre belief. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Why is the US spending one trillion dollars on wars, the reasons for which are patently false. What is going on? http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts197.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I am as serious about taking office as the possibility exists; therefore - my maintenance of this site will tend to be directed here at campaign central. Campaign slogan: I am not evil - honest to God. http://www.lewrockwell.com/chu/chu16.html Can we really expect officials who are part of such a criminal enterprise not to perceive each other as members of the same pack of wolves, and us, the taxpayers, as members of the same flock of sheep? A quiz for the voting public: Who wrote the following best seller book in American history? Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others. Campaign slogan: I am not smarter than some 5th graders; but I know how to spell Iran and Iraq. For those who read: http://atimes.com/atimes/others/trade-war.html http://www.antiwar.com/chu/c112699.html American moves to "contain" China will however have the perverse effect of delaying China's political liberalization. A Beijing unthreatened by western hegemony is prepared to allow considerably more freedom of domestic political expression than a Beijing which perceives foreign colonialists poised to take advantage of China in the event increased political freedom leads to widespread chaos. China remembers only too clearly what fate almost befell her during the late Ching dynasty, when internal disarray almost led to China's permanent partition by opportunistic Japanese, European and American imperialists. I think that sums things up. Last edited on Fri Mar 2nd, 2007 12:34 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
That’s the time frame that we’re looking at. And that is the life span of the bases that we’ve constructed there. Yeah, we are not leaving these bases, and a Democratic president, I don’t care who they are, will keep those basses there. They will justify them and they will use them and we love that. We love it. So it’s not about what the American people think is right or wrong, it’s not about if we got lied to, what matters is, they did what they wanted to do, and as bush says, and as Cheney says, “it’s quite the success.” http://www.truthdig.com/interview/page3/20070227_pentagon_whistleblower_on_the_coming_war_with_iran/ And I think that’s what we’re going to do, Democrat, Republican, Independent, I can’t imagine anybody but Ron Paul, if you elect Ron Paul as president, those bases will be closed down. Otherwise… Last edited on Fri Mar 2nd, 2007 03:38 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17220.htm
Be intolerant of falsehood within. Last edited on Fri Mar 2nd, 2007 11:34 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.investorsiraq.com/showthread.php?t=33668
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north512.html
A. Free market in money B. The other choice http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=labadie;cc=labadie;idno=2916966.0001.001;size=l;frm=frameset;seq=3;view=image;page=root http://www.perfecteconomy.com/index.html Last edited on Sat Mar 3rd, 2007 06:32 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17229.htmIf Americans sickened by the carnage of Iraq wish to stop an even more disastrous war on Iran, they had best get cracking. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul372.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/03/06/nasa.asteroids.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories NASA lacks funds to find killer asteroids POSTED: 11:51 a.m. EST, March 6, 2007 Story Highlights • NASA doesn't have the money to track all potentially dangerous asteroids • A comprehensive asteroid tracking program would cost NASA $1 billion • There are 20,000 potentially hazardous asteroids and comets out there • Agency does track objects that could wipe out most life on Earth |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-elmasri3mar03,0,3264255.story?coll=la-opinion-underdog
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Top_Justice_official_resigns_Top_House_0305.html The sudden resignation of a top government official involved in the sacking of US attorneys has raised eyebrows in Congress. http://www.lewrockwell.com/manion/manion73.html Well, if the Court doesn’t act, the Congress can. But will it? After all, the Congress has been cowering at the prospect of a constitutional confrontation with Bush for over five years, and there is no sign that it will change now, just because the chairs have been rearranged. After all, President Bush’s "signing statements" have asserted that the Congress is essentially irrelevant, and President Hillary Clinton-Rodham will undoubtedly follow suit after January 20, 2009. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=impeach+bush http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?id=8107  Last edited on Tue Mar 6th, 2007 07:35 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.isn.ethz.ch/news/sw/details.cfm?ID=17327
http://blogs.tampabay.com/energy/hydrogen/index.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17248.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f8f8f8" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f8f8f8"http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17246.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.macleans.ca/world/global/article.jsp?content=20070205_140356_140356
The capacity to defend against armed aggression is worth something to those in need of it. Why would anyone abuse that capacity? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul373.html Watch the video. If I am not the lesser of two evils, then, vote for Ron Paul. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
"The right of self preservation, in turn, was understood as the right to defend oneself against attacks by lawless individuals, or, if absolutely necessary, to resist and throw off a tyrannical government." Parker, et al. v. District of Columbia, (Case No. 04-7041), (decided March 9, 2007) |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17338.htmIn a word; greed. The sky is falling. Whoever is under it: beware. Whoever is not under it: profit. If you don't know if you are under it, then, it may be a good time to find out. The sky is made to fall – by design. If people wise up, then, people will design something better. If you the reader are worried and confused, then, please consider a simple rule – if you produce more than you consume, including the consumption called interest payments - if you earn more that consumed, then, you can get out from under the falling sky. This is really very simple. Earning more than consumed proves that you increase the total supply of wealth in the world currently. The problem (the falling sky) is an accounting error. You may be blamed for the accounting error. That is secondary. If you earn more than consumed, then, you add more to the world’s wealth. Example: If your surplus earnings are now going into a 401K savings plan, then, you may be under the falling sky. What would happen if you could take that money and pay off your mortgage? This: A. If 401K money vanishes, then, you are not affected by that loss because you cashed in before the crash. B. If you pay off your mortgage, then, you no longer have to pay a mortgage payment and you don’t have to pay mortgage interest every month while many people lose their homes since they can’t pay those payments. C. You have a home to sleep in. D. You could rent out a room in the house for extra income E. If your job is under the sky and it folds, then, you don’t have to come up with the mortgage payment or interest. F. You have more time to spend looking for work. G. You are independent from the power of mortgage debt. There are reasons why the 401K program was written in a manner that penalizes anyone removing those funds before retirement – anyone except the people holding those funds. Those people may remove those funds when those funds are invested poorly. Who profits? Who needs to beware? http://www.perfecteconomy.com/index.html http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904 http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=money+masters&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7374585792978336967 Investing your earnings is your responsibility; be accountable. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul378.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=10724
It may be a good idea to sign one of those petitions to get the Bush Regime changed before 2008. It is called: impeachment. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Impeach+bush This is a simple moral choice. Save hundreds of thousands of lives by a simple signature on simple web page. Stop one small group of evil people in a peaceful manner and save a very large group of people from death and misery where death is probably the least evil for them. Hell on earth for many compared to no more candy for a few rotten apples. What exactly is the problem here? I am asking. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17418.htm
Two reminders: http://hytechapps.com/ http://www.perfecteconomy.com/index.html Accountability backed up with renewable energy. The limit is ignorance - falsehood. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/26/politics-20/ At this posting date: Barack Obama 81623 Friends John Edwards 16012 Friends Hilary Clinton 5492 Friends John McCain 2579 Friends Mitt Romney 2944 Friends Bill Richardson 1784 Friends Ron Paul 1670 Friends Dennis Kucinich 1425 Friends Joseph Biden 1279 Friends Christopher Dodd 494 Friends Rudy Giuliani - Profile Set to Private Joe Kelley - 0 Friends (I'm not very popular  Last edited on Tue Mar 27th, 2007 01:00 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/chartier/chartier66.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17469.htm Above is another source linking the information required to know why the Iraq take-over has been perpetrated. http://pol.moveon.org/townhall/iraq/review/rate.html?id=10114-7617534-7OXkLd If the people at the link above read the information required to know why the perps lie, cheat, torture, and mass murder their way into Iraq, then, the questions would take on a more focused focus aimed at the criminals to get the criminals exposed as criminals - if nothing else. As president I will expose the criminals as crimials. I see good cause to send them to the Iraqi people to be tried for their crimes. I can only hope that the Iraqi people can forgive them. We have an obligation to stop the torturing and killing. By "we" I mean "Human Beings". The least that can be done is to expose the people who abuse the power required to perpetrate these crimes. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17461.htm
By "Our" hands I take that to mean "Human Beings". The actual people who commit the crimes are not "Us". "Our" crimes include a dependence upon falsehood. It is past time for Power-Independence. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north523.html
Iran is planning to stop using the U.S. dollar to price oil, with less than half of its oil income now paid in the U.S. currency, Iran's central bank governor said. While reading the above it may help to refer to a map:  The quid pro quo for the dollar's sole acceptability in Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni members of OPEC is protection. As long as the United States keeps the State of Israel on a tight leash beyond its own borders, the Saudis need fear only the Shi'ites. With Iran now selling oil only for other currencies, it has offered a challenge to the other OPEC exporters. They can get out of the petrodollar trap by switching to the euro. Iran is about to set the precedent. Iraq did, but it was invaded. Then the old arrangement was reimposed by the Americans: oil for dollars only. Last edited on Wed Apr 4th, 2007 06:31 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/chartier/chartier69.html How does the saying go...? As serious as Nukular war! How about this: If the choice is between the better of two evils, then, add more zeros. Eventually the choice will actually be between two goods (relatively speaking). |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
++++++++++ How do you define wealth, poverty, and power? ++++++++++ x, Thanks for the effort to be more precise. If I can manage to accomplish a task now it will be to answer your specific question and return to your topic afterward. Wealth (according to me, who is one example of the category: human being) is that stuff that stores value. Poverty is a living condition that is absent value. Power is an ability to accurately move matter. Examples: Having the power to precisely move that stuff that stores value from someone who earns that stuff to someone who earns power is the power to cause poverty. Imagine, for example, one person or a number of people who pay off their mortgages and own their homestead. That is a power to move the title (a piece of paper) from the trustee (here in California) to the person occupying the home. From that point on there is an end to the transfers of stuff from the person occupying the home to the Bank. The Bank must look for other sources of wealth after that one or more than one individual severs that link. Where does the Bank get its stuff that stores value? Here is where I will try to return to your original topic and I will make a special effort to avoid sounding utopian. Imagine 150,000,000 people in the U.S. (roughly half the population) decide to organize a mortgage pay off scheme. Many of these individuals were convinced, in the past, that such a ‘pyramid’ scheme would only benefit a few at the expense of the many. Now the scheme has been hard wired into an encrypted hard drive that each individual owns and all the hard drives are virtually identical having the same software with the exception of data input. In other words the hard drives are merely one simple accounting program. The ‘system’ is universal for all 150,000,000 participants. Each participant adds a voluntary wealth transfer into the system as they choose – individually. The ‘system’ buys the titles of properties based upon a ratio of who voluntarily transfers the highest amount of wealth relative to their remaining debt. In other words; the person who transfers the entire debt amount to the ‘system’ is rewarded with the title of his property first. The person who transfers almost all the debt into the ‘system’ is the next property to be purchased by the ‘system’ to be transferred to that person when all that debt is paid. You may or may not see the writing on the wall with this experiment in thought at this point. 150,000,000 million people transfer wealth to a ‘system’ in the effort to regain title of their property. The person who first transfers all the debt they owe is the person who receives the title of their property first. No person receives the title of their property until they pay off all their debt. The ‘system’ encourages (like a race to the top) people to send wealth to the ‘system’. You may now wonder how this ‘system’ is any different than the current ‘system’. You may wonder how this ‘utopian dream’ or this ‘pyramid scheme’ has anything at all to do with your topic. If so, then, I can’t answer that skepticism without your participation in calculating numbers. The ‘system’ receives additional wealth at a rate determined by individual choice that is multiplied by the number of choices. Example: 1000 units of wealth per person per year can be an imaginable rate of wealth transfer from the many to the one (system). 1000 times 150,000,000 per year. Of course the rate will not be determined by edict; rather - the rate is determined by individual choice based upon a perceived desire to gain title of property early. Now – suppose we calculate the average rate above for a time period of 10 years to arrive at a ‘system’ total income before delving into the pay-off. 1000 times 150 million times 10 equals a lot of wealth transferred from many to one. You can do the math to check my results. I get: (too many zero’s to count on the M.S. calculator). It is something like 1,500 thousand million per year? What is the proper number? 150,000,000 Times 10 years will add one zero. 1,500,000,000 That is now one trillion five hundred million units of wealth from the many to one. Now add three more zeros (1000 units per year per person). 150,000,000 1,500,000,000 1,500,000,000,000 Now the one has to pay out. Before ‘pay-out’ we (if you want to follow along) can assume (for the sake of ‘argument’), that no one has yet paid off their entire debt. In other words the entire 150,000,000 participants have yet to pay off any mortgages after 10 years in this ‘pyramid scheme utopian dream’. What is the word used for numbers greater than trillion? How about Gazillion? One Gazillion five hundred trillion dollars has transferred from the many to one after 10 years. What, you may ask, is the pay-off? What inspires participation in this utopian dream? The ‘system’ buys mortgages based upon that previously mentioned ratio (the most contributed divided by the least owed, or, the least owed divided by the most contributed, or, some other calculation that is universally applied to everyone equally) and the ‘system’ charges only the cost of operating the ‘system’ divided by the number of participants. Did I lose you? Return to the number: One Gazillion five hundred trillion. Divide that number by the average mortgage debt per house and arrive at a number of mortgages owned by the ‘system’ to be transferred to each person who manages to pay into the ‘system’ their remaining debt. I’ll leave this here for lack of interest shown by anyone I have yet to find who shares my interest in this type of anarchist thought. http://www.anarchism.net/forum/board_entry.php?id=13466&page=0&order=last_answer&descasc=DESC&category=0 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski180.htmlI don’t have many answers yet – but let me tell you what I will do if I were given Dick Cheney’s job. Welcome aboard! Rather than continuing to embrace an unfettered faith in authority, despite all evidence that such faith is lethal, there is now an awakening of independent and cooperative spirit leading to actual problem solving utilizing imaginative reason. Who said it best? "The revolution occurs," Hess says, "when the victims cease to cooperate." |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_thepen_070427_there_s_hunger_for_i.htm I sent: Extradite the criminals to the Iraqi authorities. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8581.htm Mass Murderer's and Serial Killers. Is that what you pay for? Check your tax form. It is all on paper (and in movies). |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=10252 That is my version of the campaign trail. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Democrats_trump_Republicans_solidly_05052007.html I need a bit of wisdom. Everyone does. How about this: ‘The remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics”.’ The Power to force a specific fact into the limelight is a powerful force especially when such a fact distracts attention away from another fact. In effect, of course, one fact becomes more powerful than the other fact. Statistics do not lie no more than a gun (or box cutter) can kill. People lie. People kill. Example: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/ Some statistics can be 'officially' determined from that link above. One of those statistics counts people who are no longer living because someone, not some thing, killed them. Finding out who killed them is finding a fact. Call it fact finding. One of the candidates ONLY ONE supports a fact finding endeavor known euphemistically as IMPEACHMENT. See how this works? Someone kills someone and then another person endeavors to account for the killing. When this doesn't happen, then, the killer tends to keep on killing. Is this too tough to understand? Is this beyond comprehension for someone running for the Job of president of the united states? Is this too much for THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? What are some of the qualifications for the job? Must one be capable of mass murder AND have the ability to dodge accountability for the crime of mass murder? How about some more wisdom? http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/48500.html Use your own mind - that is where wisdom exists. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060710.html http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/ Last edited on Mon May 21st, 2007 10:07 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/05/18/cpa_documents/?source=whitelist
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ft/20070520/bs_ft/fto052020071356196889
That is another domino falling that will eventually bring down Dollar Hegemony. People trusting in dollar power will lose. This is like good news bad news. The good news is that the worst evil mass murdering criminals will lose. The bad news is that those powerful people may bring everyone down with them. This is very simple to see from an oil power versus solar power perspective. Had everyone on the planet changed their investment strategies 30 years ago from an Oil based economy (Dollar Hegemony) to a Solar based economy, then, the cost of production for everything now would be reaching for zero rather than the cost of producing everything now reaching for the sky. Can you not see this? The cost of oil goes up and everything made with oil increases cost too. One Solar Panel can pay for itself and reproduce itself into another Solar panel in 90 months (last time I checked the pay of rates of production). What that means is that Solar panels can make as much POWER as it COST to make the Solar panel (more electricity comes out of the Solar Panel than the TOTAL electric COSTS used to make the Solar Panel by a wide margin). A Solar Panel lasts for 25 years (at least). So…had everyone re-invested in Solar energy 30 years ago the planet would be filled with independent electric generating homes where people have no electric bill. People would have then demanded electric cars. People would then have no fuel bills. The energy (Power) from the Sun would be fueling transportation for no cost. What does a world economy look like when transportation costs are lowering? What does a world economy look like when transportation costs are rising AND the costs are transfers of wealth from the many to the few who go around the planet killing all the competition who dare to sell oil at low prices? The bad news is inevitable for those who have invested in Dollar Hegemony. The good news is that news above. http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00000984/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Should Vice President Cheney Be Impeached? Should there be Mandatory Paper Ballots for All Elections? Should Congress Investigate Abuses of Power on Iraq (HR 635)? http://www.usalone.com/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17777.htmOntario could have its public auto insurance only if it paid U.S. insurance companies what they estimated would be their present and future losses in Ontario auto insurance sales, a prohibitive cost for the province. Thus the citizens of Ontario were not allowed to exercise their democratic sovereign right to institute an alternative not-for-profit auto insurance system. In another case, United Postal Service charged the Canadian Post Office for “lost market opportunities,” which means that under free trade accords, the Canadian Post Office would have to compensate UPS for all the business that UPS thinks it would have had if there were no public postal service. The Canadian postal workers union has challenged the case in court, arguing that the agreement violates the Canadian Constitution. Compared to invading and mass murdering the civilian population the above is tame. Compared to liberty the above is terrible. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.kickthemallout.com/staticpages/index.php/Greg_Palast_Proof_of_Rove_Fraud_Audio
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17784.htm Why I Am Leaving the Democratic Party By Cindy Sheehan |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15096.htm View at your own risk. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/052507H.shtml
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17847.htm How about the following campaign slogan: Torture hurts. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Leahy_readies_subpoenas_on_warrantless_wiretapping_0608.html Two fronts for me as President. The most important front is exploring any possibility of human survival off the planet Earth. Why? People need hope. The difference between life with hope and life without hope is significant. The difference between the Human Species survival limited to this planet and Human Survival off this planet is significant. A. Only Earth is limited to only Earth B. Not limited to Earth is no longer limited to Earth The first front includes all economic questions because a productive economy for all will be necessary to explore any possibility of human survival off the planet Earth. This is a fact, people, if we cannot pull together in a common cause, then, we will remain mired in misery. No one can be allowed to suffer at the expense of everyone else - this cannot happen. Getting our economy up to a modern standard is necessary for the first front. First front: Human survival (past just our survival on earth). First front: Human Survival Do you understand? Second front (look at the link): Make it too expensive for criminals to commit crimes. I need your help. You need my help. Don’t elect me; but DO NOT ELECT ANOTHER CRIMINAL MASS MURDERING TORTURING MONSTER – please. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17856.htm
People, If elected my aim will be transparency. I can hire a camera man to follow me around to meetings. If 'Putin' doesn't want the meeting televised, then, what is the point? Think in terms of 'reality presidency'. I don't have anything to hide. Some things are none of your business, like, which hand I use to wipe my ass. Matters of 'National Security' must be YOUR business. I'm not saying that you have to watch the latest news. I'm saying that you will not be excluded from matters of national security. You will have to exclude yourself.
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=7ktlyxqco9 "Who among us will stop this war?" Demorats have not failed us. Note: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Kucinich_Impeachment_may_well_be_only_0315.html Kucinich is a Democrat. Kucinich: 'Impeachment may well be the only remedy which remains to stop a war of aggression against Iran' Ron Brynaert Published: Thursday March 15, 2007 So, Keith, is your speech missing a few important details? I wonder why... Last edited on Mon Jun 11th, 2007 03:58 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listen please. Two things: A.
Note how the above communciates something evil. Know this to be true. The above communicates a person alledgedly claiming the destruction of "Israel". That is clear - no? How could that be made any clearer? Ahmadinejad is promising to destroy Israel according to the head line. Does anyone not 'get it'? Now contrast the above with the actual quote:
Note: The countdown referes to a regime. The countown does not refer to a country. Imagine a contrast if you please. Suppose I took the following statement and spun the following statement to mean something it does not mean.
Now; I take the above quote and with some creative spinning I come up with the following headline: Clock ticking to America's 'destruction': Kucinich Here you have a courageous member of congress (one of a handful) who has taken the steps required to peacefully remove a Madman from committing more torture and mass murder. Kucinich did not start the clock ticking toward the destuction of America. Ahmadinejad did not start the clock ticking toward the destruction of Isreal. Legal Criminals continue to torture and murder massive numbers of innocent people and they continue to do so - on purpose. These legal criminals are members of a regime that will not remain in power much longer. If they do, then, God help us. Ahmadinejad is not a member of a powerful regime. Iran is not run by Ahmadinejad. Iran has not threatened, and still does not threaten, any other country. The 'spin' is meant to justify the actions of a criminal regime bent upon world domination. Iran is next on the list because Iran is a threat to Dollar Hegemony. How about a look at the facts from a perspective that is not as brutally serious? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7374585792978336967 Watch that video and learn - with more than a small dose of humor. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17873.htmThese people have forfeited all trust and credibility, especially as it seems they tell their lies for political reasons. Old sayings: You get what you pay for. Reap what you sow. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/13/%e2%80%98we-have-made-a-deal-with-the-devil%e2%80%99/
For those who are wondering; What on Earth are they thinking? A. Profit from Blood There is no B. What is being set up is the same thing as the Killing Fields. Watch the movie (if nothing else): http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+killing+fields How about a euphemism? How about knowing what a euphemism is? Think lie. Think what a liar would call something that the liar doesn't want you to understand what 'it' is. Here we go: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ethnic+cleansing  Are you getting the picture. You can bank on one thing: The Shiite population will be getting it. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Shiite Who has blood on their hands now? How about this angle: If you are thinking about adoption, then, get em while they are still alive. Last edited on Thu Jun 14th, 2007 07:57 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2007/06/14/bush_foreign_policy/index_np.html
How far along in the race to the bottom have we come? How about a contrast? http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-parable-of-perfect-economy.html
It's the currency - stupid. Bush knows this; that is why he must destroy Iran's control of oil. Oil is currently backing the dollar. The domino theory is working here. If Iran sells oil ‘off the dollar’, then, the dollar value will fall. If Hugo Chavez sells oil ‘off the dollar’, then, the dollar value falls. Iraq was invaded for the control of its oil. The saddest part about these sadists (Neo-Confidence schemers and Neo-convicts) is the level of sheer destruction they have wrought IN YOUR NAME. Not mine. Those legal thieves do not have anything of mine that has not been stolen from me. Like a light switch this country can turn from the direction of despotism, destruction, war, misery, torture, desolation, immorality, debauchery, and all that is evil toward prosperity, liberty, and posterity. All that is needed is a more accurate currency. Imagine waking up right now knowing this to be true. Now imagine two people realizing this fact. Now consider the power involved when 300 million American’s have an accurate currency with which to make the American Dream a continuously improving reality. Why listen to me, or anyone, why not simply know the truth yourself? Answer: Falsehood. To find it you must first look in the mirror. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.ae911truth.org/joined.php I joined. Truth is good. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6883441047197474365 Last edited on Sat Jun 16th, 2007 10:51 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/6/17/14638/6423
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/17/sy-hersh-on-tagubas-abu-ghraib-investigation/The bare minimum for any concept of right will be to slow down the acceleration of mass torture and mass murder.It doesn’t pay to do a thorough investigation for this White House as Major Gen. Taguba found out, but what about Bush’s role in all of this? Do you understand this? At least, at the very least, the cause of good must impede the growing progression toward increased human misery – at the very least – a slight impediment is in order – even if that momentary slow down toward human destruction is miniscule. Just how close to hell on earth can we get? How fast can we get there? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17893.htm
The US Embassy in Beirut and the CIA will neither confirm nor deny involvement in the plan to use Al Qeada How about a Google Search for "The enemy of my enemey" http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=the+enemy+of+my+enemy&btnG=Search Take your pick. I pick this: http://www.disinfo.com/site/displayarticle19740.html http://www.cbc.ca/thehour/disinformation.php Watch out - you can get lost. I have a way of looking at life and you may consider it: At any given moment a person has many choices that must be eventually narrowed down to one. Before arriving at one there will be four choices. Best Next best bad Worst If you, or anyone, is being told that only the last two choices exist, then, you may want to get a second opinion i.e. next best. This is one of many possible methods of finding the best. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15320.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15264.htm Peak Oil? http://hytechapps.com/
http://www.savefuel.ca/index.php
http://blogs.tampabay.com/energy/2007/02/water_and_gasol.html
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html Stan Meyer's Dune Buggy that ran on water. Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel in an ICE motor. On board electrolysis, no hydrogen tanks, no bombs on-board, just water. (1998) It ran 100 miles per gallon! The 2nd best inventor of the Century, besides Tesla, who was and will always be #1. Stan is the mustard seed of Water Powered Cars! The video left above is a one timed aired news cast, from his home town of Grove City , Ohio that you are not to view. The video screen to the right is a segment of the Equinox program about Stanley aired back in Dec. 1995 (approx.) See the entire program entitled "It Runs on Water" narrated by Arthur C. Clarke in video clips below. It is in 4 parts, made possible by Andy the WizardKing from Blackpool, England. Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3 • Part 4 http://kucinich.us/node/1719
If you listen to the "independent" documentary and are apt to feel afraid, then, think with your own brain - instead. You can start investing in methods of producing your own currency. Solar power is just one example. Imagine, for example, leaving your children a home that creates it's own electric energy at a rate that supplies 4 of your neighbors with enough electricity to supply any demand including 5 electric cars. Your independent power creation (once the system pays for itself) supplies free electricity. Your next generation can sell electricity at half the current rate to all four neighbors (north, south, east, and west) and all 5 families have no gasoline cost (electric cars). NO GASOLINE COSTS. That is how Peak Oil becomes nothing more than a BOOGIE MAN. That is happening already and that doesn't even account for the energy supply contained inside water. The power to prosper is firstly a power to defeat falsehood. If you watch the vido titled Oil, Smoke, and Mirrors: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15264.htm If you watch that, think, do those people know basic logic? Are they really too stupid to see the simple fact that the Sun supplies abundant energy that is now a simple phone call away from having that energy turned into electricity? If you are still confused, then, go back a look at the WATER being used as fuel links. Two very simple future paths: You fill up your car with the garden hose (water). You plug your car into your Solar (and wind power) system. What is the reason for fearing a loss of oil supply? Think man. Think women. The power to make you fear the loss of oil is the power that makes you fail to see any other power - your own power, for example, to defeat falsehood. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21948945-1702,00.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.antiwar.com/paul/index.php?articleid=11171Have We Forgotten 2003 Already? Having already initiated a disastrous war against Iraq citing UN resolutions as justification, this resolution is like déja-vu. Have we forgotten 2003 already? Do we really want to go to war again for UN resolutions? That is where this resolution, and the many others we have passed over the last several years on Iran, is leading us. I hope my colleagues understand that a vote for this bill is a vote to move us closer to war with Iran. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
No Guns
How about early democracies? http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm “The Saxons, who subdued Britain, as they enjoyed great liberty in their own country, obstinately retains that invaluable possession in their new settlement; and they imported into this island the same principles of independence, which they inherits from their ancestors. The chieftains, (for such they were, more than kings or princes,) who commanded them in those military expeditions, still possessed a very limited authority; and as the Saxons exterminated, rather than subdued the ancient inhabitants, they were, indeed, transplanted into a new territory, but preserved unaltered all their civil and military institutions. The language was pure Saxon; even the names of places, which often remain while the tongue entirely changes, were almost all affixed by the conquerors; the manners and customs were wholly German; and the same picture of a fierce and bold liberty, which is drawn by the masterly pen of Tacitus, will suit those founders of the English government. The king, so far from being invested with arbitrary power, was only considered as the first among the citizens; his authority depended more on his personal qualities than on his station; he was even so far on a level with the people, that a stated price was fixed for his head, and a legal fine was levied upon his murderer, which though proportionate to his station, and superior to that paid for the life of a subject, was a sensible mark of his subordination to the community.” --- 1 Hume, Appendix, 1. The King today can snatch up anyone the King wishes on a whim. There is a cause and effect going on. I am non-violent. I do not solve problems with offensive violence. No one does. Violence is a problem. Look at this insurance scam idea which caused the author much trouble: http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm
If the reader reads all the links above and the reader isn't connecting the dots, then, I can elaborate. During the early democracy in England the King was forced to allow Trial by Jury where any one 'legal' person could veto any prosecution and therefore any law. Then, during that time, a 'legal' person was someone who could pay the tax of Jury Duty and military duty if called upon (someone who also produced enough wealth to own land) and such a person was called a Freeholder. The principle being that anyone protected by these laws must prove his ability to protect these laws. Not her. The battle for recognizing free women as free came later - and it is still going on. One of the laws of the land (not the Kings laws certainly) put a bounty upon the Kings killer. Think about that a moment while I elaborate on Jim Bell's revolution. Jim Bell's revolution is merely a written observation of what already exists in modern finance. An example is the case of "Put Options" placed upon the Airline companies involved in 911 BEFORE 911 happened. Think of the term "Selling Short" and your brain may begin recognizing the principles invovled. Jim Bell's revolution is here already in the form of encrypted (and therefore secure) information. An example is a program that you may buy and that program must be unlocked with a key. Many more examples exist in the revolution of communication. Think in terms of who controls the barriers. Who has the power to stop and start the flow of commerce? Does the King have that power exclusively? I can elaborate more; however - the reader should read the links first. And what would the world be without humor? Moving right along, how about the technologically-challenged? "Can you set the clock on a VCR?" Hah! Gotcha! Trick question. Nobody uses a VCR anymore. We all have DVD players. So, if you answered either "no" or "yes" to the question, clearly that means you are non compos mentis. No brainee, no votee. From: http://www.lewrockwell.com/chartier/chartier79.html Last edited on Sat Jun 23rd, 2007 12:24 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Somewhere recently my efforts were spent communicating the realities of democracy as a principle guiding human interaction. This subject matter is contentious only due to falsehood, which, leads me to divert away for a moment before returning to principled democracy. Perfect information is a concept that, if you think about it, is synonymous with education, science, and religion. In other words a living human being reaches for something. What is that something? The mind does not simply open and wait for anything to fill it. Perfect information is a concept that, if you could get it, allows the person to do anything and everything imaginable to the limits of possibility. The opposite of perfect information, in contrast, is insanity, or, perfect falsehood. What, then, is the perfect information version of democracy? Please note that I cannot provide the answer because I am not perfect. I need help. I need to propose a version of democracy for you to reject or confirm as being false or true, less false, or more true. You may simply ignore my version too. Democracy is a concept that places every single living human being equal according to the concept of law. Above is one try at describing the perfect information example of democracy as a principle. That version is inadequate because that version does not contain a description of the concept called "LAW". Here is where a more recognizable term may help. Try to call into being a term that describes an ability to cause someone to do what you instruct them to do and this ability that you now have does not account for the person you control. In other words you can control the actions of this other person even if the other person does not want to be controlled. What is the term that you dream up for this power to force other people to do things, or not do things, that you decide will be done, or not done, by other people? Along with this concept of how you can over power other people it is important to recognize something inclusive in this power. You do not have to do what you make other people do and you do not have to stop doing what you make other people stop doing. What is the word for this concept of power that you have over other people? If you can come up with a better term, then, let me know. I will use the term crime. Back to my inadequate description of democracy where the sentence used a term called "Law". Democracy is a concept that places every single living human being equal according to the concept of law. I can try again and this time I will use the term: "Crime". Democracy is a concept that places every single living human being equal according to a concept of crime. If the reader has managed to create a term that describes how someone can overpower another person and they, the reader, finds the term "Force" to work for them, then, I must object strongly. Force and Power are physics terms. Example: The power of the sun forces molecules to accelerate. The power of the sun forced the human being to succumb from exposure. The power of the sun forced the water to evaporate and begin the cycle of life on earth. Can you see the validity of my objection for using the terms Power and Force? Power and Force are essential parts of physical life without which there can be no life - at all. That is not an example of perfect information; however - we can test that last sentence for validity. Stop breathing and see how long you can last without forcing the air in and out of your lungs. Democracy is, and only is, a concept that intends to make no man or woman, no human being, a legal criminal. No one, according to democracy, is above the law. Each person, in democracy, is above the law. That last sentence may cause someone to raise their hand. Law is a creation of mankind. I can reword that last paragraph to help make my statement obvious. Democracy is, and only is, a concept that intends to make no one a legal criminal. No one is above natural law. Everyone is above man made law. Democracy must account for natural law. Democracy must not, ever, create a legal criminal. Perhaps this angle of attack on the problem of finding perfect information is inadequate. An example may suffice to bring this angle of view into view. Democracy must not, ever, place one person outside any man made law. That, by definition, is placing someone outside the law. That is the creation of an outlaw - on purpose. Everyone is above man made law. Everyone is able to make man made law. Everyone can and does make man made law. No one, according to democracy, is outside their own man made law. A term that describes this angle of view is Universality. That is the 'if it is good for the goose then it is good for the gander' rule. That is the limit of democracy. Any other rule is outside the concept of democracy. An easy way to see, to accurately identify, anyone who volunteers to step outside the one democratic rule is someone, anyone, overpowering an innocent person. That is easy to see. Someone overpowering an innocent person is someone who volunteers to make himself above the one man made law. That person is a democrat in that he votes to make another rule. That person is a democrat in that he decides to exercise his ability to make democratic rules. That person is not a democrat in that his rule takes away another person's rule making power. That person is above man made law, lke every other democrat, that person is not a democrat when his rule removes another democrats rule making power. That is democracy. Everyone is above man made law. Everyone is able to make rules. Everyone can volunteer to be a democrat so long as the rules they make do not interfere with rules made by anyone else. A democrat that makes a rule removing someone else's rule making power removes himself from the democratic rule of universality. The democratic ideal, then, is when everyone is the King. No one is a subject of the King. In practice there are problems with the ideal of democracy because people do, in fact, commit crimes against the innocent. If perfect information were possible, then, everyone would know how to avoid being a victim of a crime. Therefore; ideal democracy must identify all crimes before they happen and avoid them. Here is a very simple method by which that democratic ideal can be accomplished: Do not legalize crime. Do not give people the power to commit crimes. Do not make crimes legal. Do not pay people for commiting crimes. Do no reward people for committing crimes. Before I receive the inevitable criticism for my wild idealism I can easily prove three example of legal criminals. Joseph Stalin Adolph Hitler George Bush Democracy does not reward those people for their crimes. Democracy is not majority rule. Majority rule makes legal criminals out of the majority. That is outside the rule of Universality in a big way. Majority rule is a concept whereby the majority becomes outlaws like a massive concentration of Stalins, Hitlers, and Bushes. Where do YOU think Stalin, Hitler, and Bush get their POWER? I am a write in candidate because I believe in the principle of democracy. I do not believe in majority rule. Make no one below the law of universality. No one |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17914.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
More trading with the enemy: http://kucinich.us/node/1408#comment-9989
On this forum (Power-Independence) your posts are automatic. If I am going to censure them I will tell you why. I have the time and energy at this time. I may not later. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/contact/contact.html Knock knock; Is anyone home?
Last edited on Mon Jun 25th, 2007 11:02 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/the-secret-war-on-america/2007/06/22/1182019369217.html?page=fullpage
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg Look at the top. The Neo-Con Men want to nuke it. They are torturing mass murderers and we are giving them everything they ask for - and more. Why? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/24/weekinreview/24schwartz.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/24/2063/
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17933.htm Once in awhile I start babbling to my wife about things that she doesn't often allow. This is the same person, my wife, who teaches by example: If you do not stand for something, then, you will fall for anything. I recounted my initial reaction to the news I heard on the radio of the car I drove on September 11, 2001. My initial reaction was, and remains, that powerful forces are gaining more power through falsehood and violence. Who, one might ask, is the most powerful force gaining power through falsehood and violence? In other words: America's Most Wanted. A clue is: The most powerful person will not be easy to recognize as the most powerful person because that most powerful person gains power through falsehood and violence. What can be done? It may be a very good idea to begin to hold the people accountable for the torture and mass murder of human beings that began on September 11, 2001. Here is a clue: If the people responsible for the torture and mass murder of human beings beginning on September 11, 2001 are not positively identified (without any reasonable doubt), then, accountability is impossible. You can see the above to be true. You can see the above to be false. You can also ignore it in the hopes that it will go away. Innocent human beings are ignorant human beings. If innocent human beings know what is coming next and if innocent human beings know who perpetrates what comes next and if innocent human beings do nothing to stop mass torture and mass murder, then, they are not innocent and they are not ignorant. If people choose to ignore responsibility and accountability, then, people are not innocent and people are not ignorant. If the choice is to ignore reality, then, reality will step in - anyway. Time is precious and the innocent may know this better than those who are no longer innocent. Time will definitely move on at least until it runs out - for everyone; innocent or guilty. Another 911 (a new Pearl Harbor) is being implemented. If we refuse to realize this fact, then, we will suffer from it - every one of us. Don't blame me. Look in the mirror. What can you do? At least this: http://www.usalone.com/cheney_impeachment.php http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/acephalous
Last edited on Fri Jun 29th, 2007 01:21 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17941.htm Noam Chomsky is a linguist or scientist dealing in language. He is also a proponent of democracy as defined by Chomsky and not as defined by the often repeated lie: "Rule by the Majority" or 'Might makes right". To borrow from the link; as an offer of explanation:
And no one can accurately claim that Chomsky is humorless: Commentary on what is happening reveals the nature of the fears. London’s Financial Times warned that President Evo Morales of Bolivia is becoming increasingly “authoritarian” and “undemocratic.” This is a serious concern to Western powers, who are dedicated to freedom and democracy everywhere. The proof of his authoritarian stance and departure from democratic principles is that he followed the will of 95 percent of the population and nationalized Bolivia’s gas resources, and is also gaining popularity by cutting public salaries and eliminating corruption. Morales’s policies have come to resemble the frightening leader of Venezuela. As if the popularity of Chávez’s elected government was not proof enough that he is an anti-democratic dictator, he is attempting to extend to Bolivia the same programs he is instituting in Venezuela: helping “Bolivia’s drive to stamp out illiteracy and pay[ing] the wages of hundreds of Cuban doctors who have been sent to work there” among the p! oor, to quote the Financial Times’ lament.10 Last edited on Sun Jul 1st, 2007 04:43 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.usalone.com/impeach_both.php Check it out, sign in, if you feel like letting your 'representatives' know how they can 'represent' you, then, send them a note. I did. The following are return e-mails from a few 'representatives':
I cut and pasted right from the e-mail. Here are the significant words: [size=
Those are lies. If the liar is too stupid to know that the lie is a lie, then, that is one thing. Knowing the lie is a lie and spreading the lie on purpose is another thing. Massive numbers of people are being tortured and murdered while their property is being stolen. The paper trail leads right to the two Legal Criminals at the top of the Nation State Pyramid. Of course the minions will line up in a row to propagade the big lie fueling the current torture and mass murder because those 'representatives' represent the torturing murderers and they do not represent honest and productive Americans. Next up:
Simply fill in the fields, type in your message, and click "Submit" at the bottom of the page. Again, thank you for contacting me. I hope you will keep in touch. Sincerely, Barbara Boxer United States Senator How about following that trail? http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm I filled in the blanks with all my personal information and in the 'issue' box I selected "Education". In the subject box I wrote: No More Legal Criminals The following is my message:
I submitted my request for representation. Here is the response: http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/thankyou.cfm?CFID=5960344&CFTOKEN=20796471
When the 'tax payer' can't pay the tax, then, the people who live off the tax can't live off the tax. When the 'representatives' torture and murder large numbers of innocent people, then, the 'representatives' represent torturing murderers. I'm going to borrow from Dr. Phil: How is that working for you? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/07/04/put-impeachment-back-on-the-table/ Put Impeachment Back On The Table http://www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm#vitae
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-877226219512989024
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/7/13/194545/148 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13003.htm Beyond Treason Depleted Uranium weapons and the Golf War Syndrom! What the Department of Defense doesn't want you to know Department of Defense documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act expose the horrific underworld of the disposable army mentality and the government funded experimentation upon US citizens conducted without their knowledge or consent. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Beyond+Treason+&search=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=beyond+treason http://video.google.com/videosearch?um=1&tab=wv&hl=en&q=beyond%20treason |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/crovelli7.html
The above is false. Either the person spreading the falsehood is ignorant or fraudulent. Any method whereby the cost of health care is reduced is, by definition, going to reduce the cost of health care. "Become cheaper" is an asinine non sequitur argument; falsehood. How much wealth is currently being spent to reward insurance company investors for investing in insurace company profits? How much? If that amount can be known, accurately, then that cost can be known and that cost increases the cost of health care. Reductions in that cost will reduce the cost of health care. This is one of many areas in human activity where the 'capitalist' solution redistributes wealth from the many to the few by fraud and force. It appears to be a 'solution' to remove the State from the equation and let the free market reign supreme. That is the falsehood spread by State Capitalists who run Limited Liability Corporations. That is a dire fraud infecting society. Without the State acting as 'protectors' there would be no 'limited liabilities' and a corporation would be no different than a co-operative. Something would replace the State system when the State is removed. Who removes the State? Is the State going to leave voluntarily? What is needed is a re-examination of the term Government. People govern themselves. This is a fact. People also govern other people. That is another fact. People fail to govern themselves, at times, and their lack of self-government imposes a governing effect on other people. When the failure to govern the self is legitimized, then, government becomes the STATE. That is clearly the case when viewing government as an involuntary association where the innocent must obey or the innocent will be punished for their failure to obey. A clear example of this involuntary association crime is involuntary taxation. Pay or suffer punishment - no exceptions - nothing personal. That criminal viewpoint is more accurately called: "Extortion". Here is where the concept of 'insurance' can help identify government from a voluntary viewpoint. A voluntary tax can be seen as an insurance premium. Pay or don't pay at your own cost. This can be very clearly understood from the Health Care perspective. Any health care professional of any kind can treat any person at any time. Example: A person in a car accident is found at the scene by the health care professional. Does the health care professional check to see if the person has insurance before applying direct pressure to a blood gushing wound? The answer must be: it depends upon the individual's self-governing ability and the ability of other people as other people govern the individual. Most, I dare say, will do the right thing at the right time. Soon it will become clear as to the ability of the person injured to transfer some form of wealth into the insurance FUND from which the health care professionals draw their pay. Clearly the accident victim cannot be expected to pay for the construction of the ambulance, the training of the EMT, the hourly wage of the driver, the planning, building, and maintenance of the hospital, the bed, the electricity, and all the wealth consumed during his treatment. The victim may be in no position to create anything more than debt from that moment of the accident until the victim’s demise. Someone must produce the wealth required to pay the costs of medical care and insurance is one method of accounting for the transfers of wealth from those who can afford to pay to those who administer health care. People who create wealth pay. People who administer heatlh care are paid. How much do the peole who create wealth pay to insurance? That is the pertinent question. If less people can pay, then, there is less wealth that can be paid to medical professionals. If there is no insurance at all, then, each individual will pay or not pay as they are able; each person will recieve health care or not receive health care. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Continuing the expose above it may be a good idea to restate the obvious concerning the transfer of wealth from those who earn wealth to those who administer health care. This must happen. It is possible, of course, for all the heath care professionals to have two jobs. One job earns them wealth and the other job is a charitable enterprise where they administer health care. If that is the case, then, they must earn enough wealth to survive before expending effort administering health care. This can be views as 'a for profit' venture and this can be viewed as 'making a living'. This can be viewed in any way anyone wants to view it; the fact remains that wealth must be created and transferred to the health care professionals for there to be a health care profession. Who pays? That is the pertinent questions. How much is paid? That is as pertinent. If not enough people pay, then, there will be less heath care. Look at this from the excessive perspective. What, for example, could occur if too many people paid too much wealth to too many health care professionals? This is not too difficult to imagine and this experiment in thinking expands the conceptualization of the entire health care industry, practice, or whatever word describes the process of human beings caring for the health of human beings. Imagine, for example, taking the entire military budget wasted in the Iraq war and dump that money into the Health Care Profession as a grant to anyone wanting to start an insurance company. Imagine even making it a no bid contract where George Bush awards the First American Insurance Company (privatized) to his cousin or rather - anyone will do. The First American Insurance Company headed by Ebenezer Bush has 400 billion dollars worth of capital to begin offering insurance to customers. If Eb calculates too much cost to new customers, then, he won't get any customers. If Eb calculates not enough wealth transferred to Health Care Professionals, then, he won't get any customers. If Eb calculates not enough charge to customers and too much charge to health care professionals, then, the 400 billion will evaporate quickly. Eb may still not have many customers if, in fact, a better insurance exists somewhere else - somehow. Usually the 'better' insurance company only looks better and/or is subsidized by taxes, where, the real costs are hidden. Old Eb; however - keeps everything transparent and Eb charges very little to insurance customers and Eb awards huge amounts of wealth to each claim. Suppose, then, that Eb starts out in 2008 with 400 billion and the whole FUND is gone by 2009. What happens? Use your brain. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18022.htm Note:
That is only true if an accurate currency is outlawed in this country. This is the same story from the begining of this country. Whiskey was used as a currency even before the United States was formed by the Constitution. GW outlawed that form of currency and used a drafted army to suppress the internal insurgency rebelling against the Whiskey TAX. This soooooooo STUPID. All that is needed is the removal of the law that creates the Federal Reserve monopoly on currency, sure, people who have invested in dollars will have to reinvest before the dollar crashes and don't think for a minute that the wealthy won't know when and how to save their own assets. Insider trading is a method it isn't a crime unless caught. How about some honesty? A president with or without congress can get rid of the Federal Reserve and begin to issue an interest free currency backed by any American asset currently seized by the Federal Government including each citizens ability to pay taxes. The GREAT DEPRESSION DOOMS DAY PARADE is a fraud that can be forced into reality or just as easily avoided. The issue of an accurate currency (and one that people can use to regain possession of thier homes) can start a BOOM like no other in history expecially if the currency inspires investment in creating more power; such as a currency backed by electric and fuel power. This is simple. A tax break on those who produce electricity and make electric cars in one such example and one of many possible methods of inspiring more and more energy (power) production. The greater the supply of energy currency the greater will be the purchasing power of that currency because energy lowers the costs of production. If you don't know this, then, you can. If your so called 'leaders' don't know this, then, you may be ignorant. They know and that is why they make sure you don't know it. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/agitpop/the-smoking-gun-of-the-oi_b_56662.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/180707oldfootage.htm Osama reborn? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Walter+Burien&btnG=Search http://cafr1.com/Letter%20to%20Al%20Gore.html
Here we stand with energy prices shooting through the roof. Crude light breaking 52 dollars a barrel, which in most probability will drain so much money out of the pocket of the US populace and the economy that further dark days are ahead of us. With the US taking over 50% of the oil reserves in the Middle East and now being in a position to influence the rest, why is oil shooting through the roof? As always you have to ask yourself, who profits? http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=32519 http://www.detailshere.com/thebiggestsecret.htm
Last edited on Sat Jul 21st, 2007 02:44 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cafr1/CAFR.htm
TOTAL: Disclosed Government general purpose tax income: With the syndicate accomplishing 100% control, the majority of the public is no longer needed to build or perpetuate the syndicate's empire, and thus 60% of the population becomes a liability. If corrective and unified action by the public is slow in coming forth with true applied force, we are facing the strongest potential of impending and intentionally orchestrated mass genocide by the syndicate against the people ever seen in the history of this planet.
Last edited on Sat Jul 21st, 2007 03:16 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/280607Paul.htm Lysander Spooner anyone? http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm "Trial by Jury" is on the A list. Ok so it is safe to say that Ron Paul as president would not order the torture and murder of Ed and Elaine. What about the others? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/072707EA.shtml http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=10722 I can't resist (I told you so...): quote: That is the breakdown of "IT". Central Power versus Liberty It is an economic power struggle that can easily be seen from the physical perspective (an analogy) of how electric power works. Monopolists (the guys who hate competition) are akin to resistance within the circuit (society) and this resistance is a ‘load’ or ‘cost’ that has no purpose whatsoever within the circuit. The only reason for having the ‘load’ or ‘cost’ of the resistance within the circuit is to conduct the flow of power from the specific source of power to the work being done by that power. Do you see this? Resistance (cost) is the opposite of conductance (cost), where, the POWER must flow (currency) from the source of POWER to the WORK done. The idea is to lower the COST of transferring the POWER from the source of POWER to the WORK to be done. In other words; if the resistance is at a minimum, then, conductance is at a maximum and in that case ALL THE POWER is spent on getting the WORK done and NO POWER is wasted on transferring POWER – at all. Resistance is GOVERNING the flow of power and Government is a cost. How about this: A Central Power plant is plopped down right in the middle of Iraq and this single power plant can generate enough Power to supply all the electric needs of the entire Middle East, parts of Europe, Russia, Asia (China), and have a little extra for Africa, the Americas, and Australia. This isn’t too tough to imagine. Suppose it is the newest Fusion Technology and it works really, really, well. The POWER supply is produced in one location – Baghdad. How can that POWER be governed from the power source to all the places where POWER will be consumed to perform WORK? How much POWER does it cost to govern all the directions, connections, switches, under-supplies, and oversupplies of POWER? This is simple. The Cost is enormous. All the end points must connect to this one POWER source. Call this power plant GOVERNMENT MONOPOLY OF POWER. Now pass a law that punishes anyone for using any POWER that is not produced by the GOVERNMENT MONOPOLY OF POWER PLANT that is located in Baghdad. Contrast the above with a alternate approach called Liberty. Suppose the cost of building the single POWER PLANT was spent on 1 billion miniature POWER PLANTS and the total costs were the same and the total output of POWER is the same. Forget, for a moment, the problems associated with GOVERNING who gets one of the billion new POWER PLANTS and see the BIG PICTURE. I’m using too many caps – sorry. I’m too lazy to go back and edit. A. One big power plant B. Many little power plants C. Both systems cost the same D. Both systems put out the same power If you can see both systems side by side, then, you can see one big difference. The big power plant must have a connection, a resistance, and a cost of power, from every end point where work is done to the one power plant. That connection, in real terms, is wire and wire costs a lot in both physical costs (copper and aluminum for examples) and the load (cost) caused by resistance. If all the connections are added up as a total cost, then, you account for a huge cost that does not do any work compared to the other option. The Liberty option does not connect each end point to the one power plant. Each end point is self-sufficient (autonomous) and able to operate independently. The cost savings (no load, no cost, no connection, and no tax) over time is enormous. As more time goes by the rate of savings increases because the savings can purchase more individual power generators. You can see this even further, if you try, when considering the physical construction of the many individual power plants. If the individual power plants are Wind and Solar (Lunar too), then, the resistance of transporting a common fuel (oil, coal, or uranium) is eliminated since the common fuel is shipped to each power plant by nature (Sun light and heated air). In essence the cost of Government (making sure that the power flow goes from the power source to the end points where work is done) is reduced to a minimum. When the cost of government is minimized, then, there is more power to be invested in getting constructive work done and even more importantly there is more power to be invested in producing more individual power generators. Is it not obvious, now, that the single most important concern is the form of currency used? When the form of currency used is dictated (monopolized) by a central power, then, no competing currencies can thrive – on purpose. Oil will be dictated as the only power used – on purpose. Dollars will be dictated as the only power used – on purpose. To resist against the government will cost a heavy toll in human suffering and death (on a massive scale). When the central power plant idea (power) becomes too costly, then, the Liberty power plants (cost-less) power will be the only affordable option. And: The greater the supply of energy currency the greater will be the purchasing power of energy currency because the costs of production will decrease. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.oilendgame.com/ReadTheBook.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18081.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18080.htm (And it, and other government spying programs, have resulted in the government's having a list now of some 325,000 "suspected terrorists"!) That is to be compared to the self-proclaimed and confessed torturing mass murdering terrorist who ordered the "list". One can't simply torture and mass murder indiscriminately? A list is needed. Without a list the possibility of torturing and murdering the good guys is all but ensured. The following year, Attorney General John Ashcroft began his program to develop a mass network of tens of millions of citizen spies-Operation TIPS. That program, which had considerable support from key Democrats (notably Sen. Joe Lieberman), was curtailed by Congress when key conservatives got wind of the scale of the thing, but the concept survives without a name, and is reportedly being expanded today. Any "TIPS" out there? YOOOOHOOOOO How do you go about tagging your suspects? Last edited on Sat Jul 28th, 2007 09:52 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=128&Itemid=2
 With Torins impressive list of qualifications, his unwavering voice holds a power that shatters the lies of 9/11 sold to us by the government and mainstream media, “The official story we've been told about 9/11 is absolutely, physically impossible.” Those words are not just backed up with his qualifications because his presentation goes through the hard physics as well. The presentation starts out with a serious warning that reminds us the state our country is in after the false flag attack and ensuing tyrannical hijacking of the government on that September morning. A hijacking not by Bin Laden, not by Al Qeada, but by a group of tyrants that orchestrated and benefited from 9/11. “Unless you want to be charged as a terrorist, I suggest you leave the room now. This is technically seditious material and you can be charged under section 802 of the Patriot Act just for being here.” Anyone else see a problem with the "Torries" (TIPS)? Here is the problem: How do you get an American soldier to obey a criminal order and betray their own healthy concience? Answer: You can't Fuck off ASSHOLES See you in HELL Last edited on Sat Jul 28th, 2007 10:29 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/crovelli7.html The answer to our healthcare woes is thus not more government regulation, or the shifting of payment for healthcare from individuals to the government. I didn't read the whole article. The dogma is tiresome - too expensive. Health Care is much the same as the Net Neutrality issue. Side A and side B are fighting over control of power. The solution is not to transfer more power from the many and to the few. The solution is to earn more power, invest more power into earning more power, and to avoid transferring any power (by force) away from those who earn it. The problem is the monstrosity called THE STATE. Our (humanities) enemy is falsehood. The State is a monster because it is false. The STATE can not fix any problem - ever. People must fix, or create, problems. I've looked over the Kucinich Universal Heath Care Plan and find it to be a step in the right direction compared to no change in the current, and despicable, drive toward Limited Liability Corporate Fascist Health Care Profit Pyramid Schemes. Those are a lot of words but not nearly as many words as can be found in all the 'legal' documents applied to force medical proffessionals to abide by the multitude of LAWS governing the medical proffession. How about some sanity? How about logic? When the profit motive is applied to the medical profession and the word "profit" does not include a measure of 'health' for each individual involved in the medical profession, then, the medical profession will be driven toward 'making money'. Doctors may work themselves to death treating more and more patients as cheaply as possible, as fast as possible, and run their profession like an assembly line. If ever a profession existed whereby the motive for contributing toward this profession was driven by a clear sense of charity, then, the medical profession is it. Giving time and energy to better another person's life motivates people toward the medical profession. There is no money tree in the medical profession. If there is a money tree in the medical profession, then, I think that tree was built and nurtured into existence by fraud and force. It is unnatural. Fraud and force be seen as a cause of the problems associated with the medical profession with a simple investigation. Follow the paper trail. Who controls the paper trial? Who dictates the costs associated with moving paper? You may not be accustomed to viewing this issue in this manner. If you are not accustomed to viewing this issue in this manner, then, you are now realizing the fraud part of the problem. This viewpoint uncovers the problem and goes directly to the source of the problem. Any person living can become infected with a form of injury that will cost that person more wealth than that person can ever produce in his entire lifetime. That person may die of the infection. That is a huge price to pay. How can that person survive the infection? That person, any person, must disperse the cost of treatment. Other people must pay the cost of treatment or that person will die. That is fact. That above is irrefutable fact. Take any example of infection, injury, disease, accident, and crime visited upon any person and know that the costs of treatment can easily exceed any capacity for one person to assume those costs on their own. This brings up many possible viewpoints that people utilize to conceptualize how the costs of treatment are dispersed from the injured to other people. A. Society pays the costs B. The Free Market pays the costs C. Government pays the costs D. The State pays the costs E. Insurance pays the costs It matters not how any one person or any group of people sharing any one viewpoint view the facts and how the facts are labeled. The facts remain the facts. The redistribution of costs associated with medical treatments happens. It happens no matter what form is filled out or which agency fills out the forms. It happens or people die. Allow me to pick what happens to work as the most accurate method of accounting for the actual transfers of wealth when individuals are treated by medical professionals. E. Insurance pays the costs If the medical profession is to be liberated from all fraud and all misdirected force, then, the focus of attention must be directed at INSURANCE. Insurance is the practice of being TAXED in proportion to a predictable measure of future cost. If you are going to be insured, then, you must be TAXED. I use the term TAX to mean simply: You can't spend all your earnings on fun stuff, NO, you have to TAX yourself and give up some of your wealth toward a FUND where other people have access to that WEALTH when medical costs MUST BE PAID FOR. Although doctors are driven into the medical profession for charitable reasons it is absurd to expect anyone to work for free. This falls under the "You can't have your cake and eat it too" perception unless you happen to be a lying theif (and even that profession requires a TAXING amount of time and effort expended by anyone profiting from it). This brings up the term Universality. How much does one person pay and how much does one person receive during the transfers of wealth associated with the medial profession? And - what governs those transfers of wealth? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Of the three major sources of energy available to human kind there is one that towers above all others as a human means to a human end. The three: Solar Energy Hydrogen Energy Human Energy As human beings harness Solar Energy (which includes Wind Power) the cost/benefit ratio will increase and that ratio is currently at approximately 200 percent. A cost/benefit ratio of 200 percent is easily enough to accelerate the growth of industry harnessing Solar Energy to a state of oversupply. If you do not understand the meaning of what I say (even if my English is not perfect), then, ask questions – please. How can I be more polite without becoming unbecoming a proud and confident human being (I am not a slave to anyone)? As Energy currency reaches oversupply the costs of Energy Currency reach zero. There are current advancements in Solar Energy Technology that will increase the cost/benefit ratio well beyond 200 percent, where, an investment of 100 units if ‘cost’ will produce more than 300 units of ‘cost’. Again – currently the cost/benefit ratio is sufficient to accelerate the industry into a state of oversupply and at that point Electric Energy will near the cost of zero. Solar Energy (as a source of Electric Energy) currently competes with, at least, three major competitors as human beings apply industry toward creating Electric Energy (which is then used to eliminate the need for an abundance of human labor = a subset of human energy). Solar Energy competitors: 1. Coal 2. Uranium 3. Natural Gas I’ve read studies comparing the cost/benefit ratios between the major competitors and without fail (yet) those studies gloss over an important calculation. The studies calculate the costs of bringing up the infrastructure into a state of production and then calculate the rate of production for that industry. The studies fail to account for the fact that Solar Power Plants (once built) do not require a steady supply of fuel being shipped into the plant. Is that not an important calculation? It is an important calculation. Coal, Natural Gas, and Uranium Electric Plants must be constantly fed with more and more Coal, Natural Gas, and Uranium to produce Electricity. Without more and more Coal, Natural Gas, and Uranium flowing through the industry there won’t be another Watt of Electricity supplied to the Grid – not one more Watt. How much Human Labor must be applied to all the other industries (including industries supplying food, water, and the removal of waste) if Coal, Natural Gas, and Uranium stops flowing? On the other hand: In as little as 15 years time every working (capable of producing wealth) person on the planet could be producing their own electric current demanded by each working person (without needing to purchase coal, natural gas, or uranium) without borrowing one dime, and, armed with a means of borrowing (without usury interest) the population of the planet could be producing double their current demand for electricity (and selling their oversupply to pay off their loans) to anyone who continues to demand more electricity. Again – when the supply of Energy Currency reaches oversupply, then, the cost reaches zero. That happens, in physics, because an abundant supply of energy reduces the costs of production which brings me to the production of electric powered vehicles currently on the market. The drive (demand) for electric power vehicles is driven by Human Energy in the form of intelligence, where, human beings know right from wrong, good from bad, economically valid from economically invalid – calculation. People are learning. Currently the market for electric powered vehicles is a market driven by falsehood. In the effort to reduce losses (costs) assumed by the oil and vehicle industries during the phase out of petroleum driven vehicles and toward the electric power driven vehicles the suppliers of oil and petroleum driven vehicles are generating falsehood. Example: There is no logical reason to produce any vehicle other than an electric powered vehicle. An increase in the supply of electric powered vehicles will increase the demand for electric power produced at each individual consumer’s base of operations (home or business). I’m speaking of an economic market adjustment that is turning and will accelerate as soon as the current level of falsehood is defeated and replaced with a more current level of accurate information flowing through the world economy. There is no logical reason to proceed in half steps and half measures like “Hybrid” cars and “Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars”, other than, the logic of conserving the profits of the oil and petroleum fueled car industries. An immediate change from petroleum to electric powered vehicle production will transform the human experiment from a DOOMED species toward a prosperous species. Half measures merely transfer the costs of the waste from the managers of those industries (it is their responsibility) to the consumers (who have to pay for these horrible decisions) at rates of ‘cost’ that exceed any reasonable measure; think in terms of individual human beings being tortured and groups of human beings being murdered. Moving on to Hydrogen power: Second to Solar power (physical supply), is Hydrogen power (not counting the Hydrogen supply in the Sun) and this supply of energy is stored in water. Hydrogen energy cannot compete, currently, with solar power (or coal, natural gas, and uranium) because the demand for electricity is not yet accelerated by the increase in the supply of electric powered vehicles. Once the supply of electric powered vehicles increase and therefore the demand for greater supplies of electricity (Solar wins easily over coal, natural gas, and uranium) increases, once that inevitably happens, there will be an increase in the demand for a means of storing excess production of electricity. Hydrogen energy is a method of storing excess electric energy production. This is abundantly clear to anyone armed with a reasonable intelligence and accurate information. Example: Currently the industries producing electricity produce enough electricity to meet the demand at ‘peak hour’ rates. Do you understand this? At peak hour rates the demand for electricity is very high (summer time in a big city when everyone is using electricity to cool food, homes, businesses, etc) and know this to be true. What happens during hours when the demand falls off to a minimum? Do the electric producers produce peak output all the time? No. The production of electricity lowers as the demand for electricity lowers because electricity is a use it or lose it source of energy. Now; imagine what would happen if the producers of electricity continued to produce electricity at the peak rate for 24 hours every day, every month, and every year. What happens? That answer is obvious. They can’t. There is no way (currently) to store the excess production (more than the current demand). What about hydrogen? Look into the hybrid car situation and you can see what I am trying to communicate. Look into the hydrogen on demand products currently available on the market and you will know what I am trying to communicate accurately now. Return to the 24 hour PEAK production rate for the coal burning, natural gas burning, and uranium burning electric power industry again. Consider how things can work when those industries maintain peak production rates all the time (even during low demand cycles). At peak demand (summer time at noon perhaps) all the production of electricity is used up; however – at minimum demand times the production rate of electricity can continue to be produced at the PEAK rate of production. What happens to the excess electricity? The excess electricity for the whole year (running at full production rates) is stored somehow (placed into a huge battery or bank of batteries). If the capacity for storing the over production of electricity is enormous, then, an electric plant can run 24 hours a day for one year and then shut down for one whole year (more or less depending upon rates of production and consumption). This is very much like an electric car going up a hill. At the top of the hill the car starts going down the hill. The driver of the car has to apply the brakes to avoid going too fast. The brakes on the electric car are generators (the wheels are used to turn an electric generator producing more electricity to fill the batteries). Going up hill the car uses power. Going down hill the car uses the power of gravity to recharge the batteries. The car does not ‘get something for nothing’. The car doesn’t waste. The car doesn’t waste. The car is designed to utilize energy efficiently. The car stores power when power is available instead of wasting the opportunity to store the available power. Hydrogen competes against coal, natural gas, and uranium because hydrogen is A Storage Medium. Hydrogen is stored in water. Water is a Storage Medium. When electric production for Solar, Wind, Coal, Natural Gas, and Uranium exceeds the current demand (non peak hours) that ‘over-production’ can be used to separate water into oxygen and hydrogen. Oxygen and Hydrogen (as one gas or as separate gases) can be stored as a fuel to be used for producing power. The application of a battery (or capacitor) within a circuit is not a new concept. And the reader can better understand how a battery (or capacitor) works in a circuit if the reader equates the above scenario with something economists call “The Business Cycle”. At this point my work here and now currently arrives at the POWER TOWERING ABOVE ALL OTHER POWERS that is available to human kind as a source of prosperity for posterity (ensuring the survival of our species against any and all threats of extinction including Super Nova of the Sun and collisions with meteors) and this power is human power (call it whatever name you decide to call it). Human Energy competes against any and all other sources of energy. Human Energy is the principle driving the interest that must exist and must be produced for any other application whatsoever. Without Human Energy driving human activity there can be no human existence. This should be a clear as Sunlight on a summer day. There should be no clouds of falsehood blocking this sunlight – none whatsoever. The Business Cycle is a simple matter of poor design and missing elements in human economy (application of human energy). What is missing is a battery (or capacitor). What is missing is a means of storing over capacity during periods of low demand and what is missing is the realization of the opportunity to produce during periods of low demand. What is missing is the battery (or capacitor) in the circuit. What is missing is a BANK. In modern society, on our planet, the BANK has been removed. In place of the BANK, in our modern society (worldwide), there exists now a false BANK that works even worse than an unnecessary resistor, worse than a load, what exists now, is a counter-productive waste, an unnecessary governing body, and worse, the BANK is removed and replaced with a short circuit. Current to healthy parts of society is short circuited by the false BANK. Power is short circuited and grounded, wasted, and burned off, or not produced, merely for the investment in, and security of, the FALSE BANK. The false bank siphons off the power to be used entirely in the interest of preserving the falsehood required to disguise the operation of the false bank – like a parasite or leach. Having no bank is destructive enough. The utilization of a parasite in place of a bank removes the knowledge of the absence of a bank much like applying leaches to cure a case of anemia or amputating the head as treatment for a nose bleed, AND, paying the doctor your last dime to perform his treatment of choice. What is missing is a real BANK. A real BANK working as a BANK, like a battery (or capacitor), is missing in modern society. A real bank will smooth out THE BUSINESS CYCLE. Having no bank, no real bank, will cause the business cycle to fluctuate to the extremes. Having a short circuit (a false bank) destroys the parts of society that are cut off by the false bank (short circuit). Again – if the power companies produce at maximum production rates and the circuit has a means of storing over production, then, those power companies can shut down for any reason whatsoever and the flow of power continues at peak rates of consumption for as long as the BANK capacity lasts. When the supply of power in the BANK reaches zero, then, the production of power must resume – of course. Having no BANK in the circuit requires a continuous cycle of waste and missed opportunity. When HUMAN POWER fails to understand and fails to recognize the need for a real bank (battery or capacitor) then human power will continue to be underutilized and over utilized as if human power itself is power-less at best and at worst (and this is the bottom line) destructive of itself. The principle failure of human power is a failure to create and maintain a very simply device – the bank. In place of the bank now, in our global society, is organized crime. If you can’t see it, then, you prove the reason why it remains powerful. You can’t fight against an invisible and unknown enemy. You cannot produce the necessary device required to ensure prosperity when you think that the device already exists. When the device required for human survival is replaced with a false one, then, human existence is doomed by that falsehood. See it in time or kiss our species farewell. It was a glorious experiment while it lasted, for some, and a miserably tragedy for others – all for the lack of a simple device - a very simple device in deed. Human knowledge is stored in truth. Bank on it. Don’t settle for anything less. Don’t invest in falsehood. The rate of return is negative – on purpose. In the words of one of America’s presidential candidates: “Follow the money”. http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=11095.180 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18093.htm U.S. drops Baghdad electricity reports The daily length of time that residents have power has dropped. The figure is considered a key indicator of quality of life. By Noam N. Levey and Alexandra Zavis Times Staff Writers |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18102.htm Please read that article. I'm not begging. Fuck that. Look people - at some point you have to understand that death is inevitable. How do you want to live? Do you want to live like a coward? Do you want to be a slave? If not, then, you must learn. A coward is stupid. A slave is ignorant. At the very least you must learn that death is inevitable. You can die tomorrow in a horrible car crash. You can live today like a human being. Live today like a human being. Please read the link. Live today like a human being. I am not begging. Please consider reading the link, then, please read the link. You won't be sorry; about reading the link. You may learn something. No more legal criminals. Last edited on Tue Jul 31st, 2007 06:33 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.alternet.org/story/58328/?page=3
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOkigFvxLrk&mode=related&search= http://www.lyricsfreak.com/s/simon+and+garfunkel/the+boxer_20124664.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/300707_bush_service.html
Know the enemy. Do you know what The Cult of Personality means? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality That does not explain The Cult of Personality. I am going to try: When a significantly powerful percentage of a population embrace a belief in their own individual weakness the social order creates a demand for 'A Strong Man' of immense power (personality) to take absolute control of the social order of that society where the significantly powerful percentage of the population embraces a belief in their own individual weakness. In other words; might makes right. The mighty personality (amoral and criminal) dictates right from wrong for everyone including the segment of the population (less significant and less powerful) who do not embrace a belief in their own individual weakness. When The Cult of Personality takes control of a society the result is torture and mass murder. Read Solzhenitsyn of you cannot or will not see this to be true. The Cult of Personality is very simply a term used to describe the absolute elimination of civil social order - complete barbarity. I am inspired to re-open my copy of The Gulag Archipelago and re-search The Cult of Personality from one of its most resilient victims. I may have loaned out my copy. How about a Google search? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+Cult+of+Personality+Solzhenitsyn http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/alesol.htm At the age of 42, Solzhenitsy had written a great deal secretly, but published nothing. After Nikita Khrushchev had publicly condemned the "cult of personality" - an attack on Stalin's heritage - the political censorship loosened its tight grip for a period. Solzhenitsyn's first book, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, appeared next year in the leading Soviet literary journal Novyi Mir. It marked the beginning of Soviet prison-camp literature. Solzhenitsyn used third-person direct speech, examining the Soviet life through the eyes of a simple Everyman. Written in clear and honest style, it described the horrors of just one day in a labour camp. The book gained fame both in the USSR and the West, and was compared with Fedor Dostoyevsky's novel House of the Dead. With the royalties, Solzhenitsyn bought a green Moskvich car. How about a new search for Nikita Khrushchev and "cult of personality"? http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1956khrushchev-secret1.html Allow me first of all to remind you bow severely the classics of Marxism-Leninism denounced every manifestation of the cult of the individual. In a letter to the German political worker, Wilhelm Bloss, Marx stated: "From my antipathy to any cult of the individual, I never made public during the existence of the International the numerous addresses from various countries which recognized my merits and which annoyed me. I did not even reply to them, except sometimes to rebuke their authors. Engels and I first joined the secret society of Communists on the condition that everything making for superstitious worship of authority would be deleted from its statute. . . . Above is a clue to how The Cult of Personality Falsehood became reality. Note the propagation step from "the cult of the individual' to the "superstitious worship of authority" i.e. "The Cult of Personality". A. Associate "Cult" with "Individual" and create negative reinforcement by association against what is clearly factual i.e. individual power of will (individual power of determining right from wrong = individual authority). Cult is bad individual authority is bad. Get it? What is missing, so far, is the link between the "cult of the individual" and The Cult of Personality. Did the replacement of 'the individual' with 'personality' occur by chance and/or is the 'cult of the individual' related to The Cult of Personality. If you read Solzhenitsyn the question/answer may become easier to understand as a significant question seeking an accurate answer. A false answer to any significant question can drive future action in directions that cannot accomplish desired results. A compounding of misdirection resulting from falsehood leads to barbarism and the destruction of civil society - on purpose. The orchestration of this type of organized crime creates a flow of wealth from the victims to the creators of this propagandized Cult of Personality. The creators and the people maintaining the fraud profit from the conflicts caused by the fraud and profit from the reconstruction after the conflict. It does not take a genius to figure out the content of the information exchanged in the Secret Meetings conducted by the criminals.
Torture, another lie, is not meant to extract information. The purpose of torture is to gain "confessions", another lie, as justifications or legitimizations for torture, which, in turn legitimizes or justifies the complete elimination of individual will. The message is clear despite the contortions of the layers of lies. If you think for yourself you will be tortured. If you are not with us, then, you are against us. If you are not willing to torture, then, you will be tortured. If you are not the most powerful and most evil personality, then, you will be tortured. Confess! The most powerful personality is the most evil personality! Confess! Might IS RIGHT! If you do not yet believe, well, we have ways of making you believe. "Ve have vays of making you talk (confess)."
The "Decider" decides. The decision is to torture and mass murder.
The decider is now fabricating an artificial blow up of Iran. If that new "affair" goes off on schedule, then, there will be more torture and mass murder - on purpose. You see to what Stalin's mania for greatness led. He bad completely lost consciousness of reality; he demonstrated his suspicion and haughtiness not only in relation to individuals in the USSR, but in relation to whole parties and nations. . . . Next is the subtle link between the cult of the individual and the cult of personality. I'm leaving this effort at this point. You either get it or you will get it. You may never 'get it'. What will you do to avoid being tortured? Will you give up your power to determine right from wrong?
Who is not for "The Unitary Executive"? If you are not with us, then, you are against us. You will be as tortured as our souls. Confess! Misery loves company. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG_HuFtP8w8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pokUAsvSRs8 http://www.lyricstime.com/311-don-t-tread-on-me-lyrics.html
America is sleeping folks. It will wake up soon. Can you feel it? Last edited on Sat Aug 4th, 2007 05:23 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-377952052252839443&q=The+Death+Squads&total=1121&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=969028729334963658 Look into Consolidated Annual Financial Reports for your information. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/warren/practicalapplications.pdf |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18150.htm A trip down memory lane? In 1993, he pursued George H W Bush's invasion of Somalia. He invaded Haiti in 1994. He bombed Bosnia in 1995 and Serbia in 1999. In 1998, he bombed Afghanistan; and, at the height of his Monica Lewinsky troubles, he momentarily diverted the headline writers to a major "terrorist target" in Sudan that he ordered destroyed with an onslaught of missiles. It turned out to be sub-Saharan Africa's largest pharmaceutical plant, the only source of chloroquine, the treatment for malaria, and other drugs that were lifelines to hundreds of thousands. As a result, wrote Jonathan Belke, then of the Near East Foundation, "tens of thousands of people – many of them children – have suffered and died from malaria, tuberculosis and other treatable diseases". I can't forget Waco - can you? http://www.serendipity.li/waco.html http://www.serendipity.li/waco/wacolist.html Way to go Bill. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/160029976 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.bucks.edu/~taylors/afghanHTM.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18170.htm
Last edited on Mon Aug 13th, 2007 09:22 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18164.htm A. Free Banking There is no B. So...what happens when A is 'outlawed' anyway? What happens when the unthinkable happens? What happens when the worst human garbage is elected to positions of power where these criminals fraud and force everyone else?' Torture Murder Mass Torture Mass Murder Etc. What was A again? A. Free Banking. Imagine a new 'start-up' or two. First know what a 'start-up' is: A new business venture where a few people start up a new business venture. Example: Apple Microsoft Ebay Paypal E-Gold Those are 'start-ups'. Imagine a few more. A. An insurance company B. An investment company Now jump ahead 10 years. The insurance company 'start-up' blew up and almost everyone is familiar with the new insurance company as the new insurance company is now merging with the new investment company (it blew up too) as both companies become one. This is what happened: The insurance and investment companies began to offer a return on investment based upon the purchase of gold and the production of Solar Panels and Electric Cars. People began to convert their 401K and retirement accounts (stock, bonds, securities, etc.) into new gold backed insurance policies and gold backed investment portfolios. In fact, a RUN on these products occurred, and this RUN mirrored both the INJECTION Of new dollars by the Federal reserve and the RUN on the Stock Market in reverse. The investment run was inversely proportional to the BANK run. This may be difficult to understand. Take your average Joe. He has a few thousand in a 401K plan. He rolls it over into an E-Gold account and then purchases an insurance policy where the benefit is paid out in current prices if Gold depreciates. Call it a hedge hedge fund insurance policy. There is no penalty for early withdrawal at all. The customer buys a policy worth the amount of his purchase at the time of his purchase. If gold goes up in price his policy can be redeemed at the new price. If gold goes down in price his policy can be redeemed at the old price. People can't believe the deal even exists. It is a pyramid scheme. People don't care if it is a pyramid scheme; they buy into the scheme anyway. It 'looks' like a 'win/win' situation. 401K cash moves from Dollars to E-Gold. More and more PEOPLE won Gold and of course the price of Gold goes up in proportion to the fall of the dollar. Early investors buy cheap. Late investors don't buy as cheap. No one even thinks about tomorrow when Gold hits the roof and will start a downward slide - they have insurance. Get it? Next up: Investment The pot of gold BANKED by the new insurance START-UP grew to immense proportions and someone had the bright idea to use that store of value to create more value instead of letting that value collect dust. An option was offered to borrow from the insurance policy to transfer the E-Gold momentarily to Solar Panel Production and Electric Car Production and then have the funds returned after the sale of Solar Panels and Electric Cars. It was a wild scheme. It caught on. The average Joe invested AFTER turning his dollar denominated retirement funds into E-Gold Insurance. Joe called up and typed through all the required hoops to get his wealth liquidated into non-interest bearing GOLD. Joe bought gold and bought into the insurance scheme and then Joe found the new INVESTMENT START UP BUSINESS. The Investment Start up business offered a temporary use of the insurance account for Joe if Joe was willing to set things in motion. Joe has to say OK let's do it. Joe has to call people and get things rolling. Joe's new insurance policy wires the funds to the Investment Start UP business after gaining all the required checks and forms filled out promising to pay the insurance policy back ASAP. The investment Start UP business uses Joe's house to turn Sunlight into electricity and the investment Start UP business also uses Joe to consume the new electricity as Joe now has a new Electric Car provided by the Start UP business. Joe, under contract, has to pay back the START UP at a rate that is half his old electric bill and half his old gasoline bill - price. In other words; Joe was paying on average 100 dollars a month in Electric consumption and Joe was payin on average 100 dollars a month in gasoline (Joe didn't drive much). Joe now pays the new investment Start UP 100 dollars a month until Joe pays off the money he borrowed from himself. How do the New Start-Ups make any money? Do you know how insurance works? Do you know how investment banking works? I can assure you that someone does. It is in your best interest to know these things and it is in not necessarily in the best interest of the current bankers for you to know anything more than debt. If you are intimately familiar with the concept of debt, then, why wonder anymore? You are a slave to your own falsehood. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski189.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://foxattacks.com/iran |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/chatter_about_incident_on_west_coast_at_all_time_high.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.sobran.com/columns/2007/070802.shtmlBush is often ridiculed for his stupidity, but his real defect is an embarrassing incuriosity. Like so many people in our media-stunted age, he doesn’t want to know. In the great aphorism of Richard Whately, “He who is unaware of his ignorance will be only misled by his knowledge.” |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18263.htm All options include voting for power independence. Think about that please. Chomsky uses a term called "universality". Any written law, such as the Ten Commandments, applies to every single person in the same way (blind justice) because, by law, it is right to outlaw the behavior - not the person. See this? It is, for example, not right to give license for some people to torture and mass murder while other people are not allowed to torture and mass murder. This is true because of reality. Reality is such that one person may happen to become a victim despite all the laws pretending to protect that person. You, for example, may have a license to torture and mass murder (you are a chosen exception to the rule) and for years you manage to 'get away' with torture and mass murder (following orders) until one day, as it happens, you happen to be on the other end of the rubber hose, hot iron, electrodes, and sleep depravation, when, much to your dismay the 'rule' just doesn't seem to fit anymore. What happened? One day you are torturing and mass murdering and the next you are a victim. One day the world is right and the next day the world is wrong. While you are torturing and mass murdering life is care free and wonderful; the universe is a happy place. Then something bad happens; the universe is a miserable place where your every thought is focused upon pain - constantly. Talk about caring? While under torture (one of many being slowly murdered) you care. You care about right and wrong. It just isn't right to live every moment left in agony. It isn't right. You are forced by painful administration to be awake (you can't sleep so much as you become unconscious) as time goes by - day in and day out. What happened? How does a happy life turn into constant and relentless misery? There is an answer. A choice is made to make torture and mass murder lawful. There is a saying: Live by the sword... This is the meaning of the term: Universality, where, what is good for the goose is good for the gander; in other words - do onto others and know such deeds are your choice. Universality dictates - to each their own. Since this effort continues a series of communications aimed at the 'voting' public I see a need to reestablish a knowable fact. The DOOM on the horizon can be completely avoided without any further trouble whatsoever. This is really simple; like turning on a light switch or waking up from a good nights sleep. A. Commission a new currency specified precisely and seek bids for 3 producers to gain this public offering. B. The new currency can be utilized to pay any taxes. C. Anyone can borrow (one time only) the currency required to gain title to one primary residence at NO INTEREST. D. Anyone can borrow at 1% interest the currency required to produce independent power. E. Anyone failing to pay back their no interest and 1% interest loans cannot borrow again until they pay back their current loans. F. Anyone can borrow at 2% interest the currency required to produce, sell, charge, and purchase electric powered vehicles. Note: Any method can be utilized to alter the course of human history when the goal is to apply a universal law to everyone all at the same time. The above method is merely one of many possible methods and this method merely fits the bill currently because of the current human condition. Anyone can borrow the method to use for their own satisfaction now; as they see fit - voluntarily. If anyone is inclined to criticize the method described above, then, they may have a leg to stand on (until the torturing murderer's cut that leg off). What is the 'argument' defeating the method described above? I think the answer is: I couldn't care less. Care is not a luxury. It is a responsibility. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.wtprn.com/Cheney_Warning.html
Psssst.... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR2007042401542.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.wtprn.com/Cheney_Warning.html
Psssst.... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR2007042401542.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3505348655137118430&hl=en |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008142
People, I found and read some of the work done by Charles Murray. Example: Instead of sending taxes to Washington, straining them through bureaucracies and converting what remains into a muddle of services, subsidies, in-kind support and cash hedged with restrictions and exceptions, just collect the taxes, divide them up, and send the money back in cash grants to all American adults. Make the grant large enough so that the poor won't be poor, everyone will have enough for a comfortable retirement, and everyone will be able to afford health care. We're rich enough to do it. Why complicate something simple? Answer: Profit at the expense of the confused. What I read into the work offered by Charles Murray is a simplified approach to a complicated problem; however - why crawl when running is even easier? Why, for example, ignore the destructive nature of inaccurate and expensive currency as if inaccurate and expensive currency were handed down by God, a given, and no possible substitute does or can exist? In other words; why treat a symptom when the cause of the infection can be effectively remedied? Example: If the cause of the infection is a lack of credit flowing to people who deserve credit, then, does it make sense to credit everyone the same? Treating the problem (credit is not flowing to people who deserve credit) by crediting everyone is akin to a prescribing every known treatment for every illness to a hang-over. Is this easy to see? Consider a social group (any group at all who are connected by the same currency and by currency I mean every possible connection that is common to the group being considered) and consider this social group to be sick with something that I will describe as: The social group fails to credit the people who deserve credit and this failure shows up in many measurable ways such as: Poverty, ignorance, falsehood, and violence. Furthermore; the social group credits frauds, torturers, and mass murderers. In other words; the power to purchase flows from those who deserve it (earn it) to those who steal it and this is done institutionally (by the color of law). Again: The social group is infected with a condition whereby purchasing power flows from those who earn it to those who steal it and this fact is written into the laws governing the social group (laws written and executed by criminals). There is much more to the saying "follow the money" than meets the eye. So, again, why continue to use the criminal’s money to solve the problem caused by the criminal’s money? Answer: Profit at the expense of the confused. Simple? How about this: 1. Contract 3 new currency providers (open bids). 2. All three new currencies can be used to pay taxes. 3. Currency #1 is loaned (without any interest charge) to anyone (anywhere on the planet) for one primary residence purchase (the borrower gains the title of the primary residence). 4. Currency #2 is loaned (with 1% interest charge) to anyone for the purchase of any part of independent power production (solar panels, wind generators, or anything that produces more power independently. 5. Currency #3 is loaned (with 2% interest charge) to anyone for the purchase of any part of non-oil based transportation (electric cars). A few facts must be understood concerning the problem and the solution to the problem. A person that does not deserve credit (someone who can produce, but someone who does not care to produce, more purchasing power, more wealth, more value, more credit, and someone who does not need charity, real charity, not slavery disguised as charity), a person that does not deserve credit is, in fact, not deserving of credit. That must be understood. Someone not deserving of credit; does not deserve credit. Why give someone not deserving credit - credit? Answer: Profit at the expense of the confused. Any effort to fix the problem must include some means of identifying the people who do not deserve credit and that effort must be accurate. This is right in line with 'innocent until proven guilty' and people must know this to be true. It is as bad, or worse, to punish the innocent as it is to fail to discredit the guilty. This really isn't that tough to understand if anyone has even the simplest understanding of a credit rating. Do you, for example, continue to loan things to people who continue to steal from you? Answer: Profit at the expense of the confused. Are you confused? Will you loan me a couple thousand dollars? Will you loan me a couple thousand dollars every year of your live until you die even though I never pay it back? So this should be simple. If the new currency (currency #1) is loaned out to anyone and the person manages to pay that loan back, then, that person, naturally, builds a better credit rating. If the person does not pay back the loan, then, that person has a home and bad credit. Why take his or her house? That makes no sense (but that can be set aside for now); however - suppose the mortgage becomes the property of THE STATE (the people authorizing the creation of the new currency) to be sold to pay back the loan. The person who defaults on the loan cannot be expected to pay back another loan. Does this compute? Remember the problem? The social group fails to credit the people who deserve credit and this failure shows up in many measurable ways such as: Poverty, ignorance, falsehood, and violence. Expecting everyone to default on the loans for home mortgages is a 'conspiracy theory' if you don't mind me pointing out the obvious. People will trade in their current mortgages for a no interest loan and people will keep the titles to their property because people deserve this credit; credited to honest, hard working, innocent, and deserving human beings. People will not be able to afford not to dump their 6% mortgage (and higher) loans for a loan charging no interest. This is elementary economics. Why would anyone choose to pay twice the value of their home if they can choose to pay the simple value of their home (without interest)? Is this not simple? Why would anyone want the new currency? Why would anyone dump the old currency? The new currency can pay taxes. This 'law' makes currency SUPER valuable. Currency number 2 can pay for the whole system without any need to raise taxes. Why? Where do you think purchasing power comes from? Purchasing power comes from real power. If you have an option to borrow enough currency to rig your home, or your business, with Solar Panels, or Wind Mills, or any combination of materials that produce independent and NEW power at your home or your business then why would you not do so? You sign some papers. You make some phone calls. Your home or your business starts turning sunlight into electricity. You save the entire cost of your electric bill and that NEW currency is sent back to your account to pay off the loan PLUS 1% interest. In other words you have to pay the costs of maintaining the infrastructure of accounting for the new currency business. If you think this is far fetched, then, you may not understand the current currency system run by a private corporation and that private corporation is not poor. Where do you think that private corporation currently gains its purchasing power? Do you think that they work? Answer: Profit at the expense of the confused. How much do they profit? How much do banks profit? How do banks profit? Are you confused? Again: You call someone up. You borrow the currency needed to own your home. You pay no interest. You call someone else up and borrow the money to rig your house with home power generation and get this; you borrow twice what you need and double your output because you plan on borrowing the currency needed to buy 2 electric cars. Now your house generates twice the power you need so you sell your excess power to someone else to pay off your loan quicker. Does this not make sense? If you are already paying a mortgage, think, isn't it better to pay less for the same thing? If you are already paying an electric bill, then, isn't it better to pay less for the same thing? Is this confusing? If you, like me, are paying 100 dollars a month on average for electricity, then, isn't it conceivable that you can borrow enough currency to create 200 dollars worth of electricity a month and then pay off that loan at a rate of 150 dollars a month and pocket 50 dollars a month? The new POWER comes from the sun and the new power does not come from a coal burning electric plant subsidized by your tax dollars. OK I added the confusing term: subsidized. I don't mean to confuse you. I don't wish to profit from your confusion. I think I am pretty keen on both "The Problem" and "The Solution". The solution is not to punish the innocent. The solution is not to credit the guilty with anything other than discredit for their crimes – accurately. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://mwhodges.home.att.net/reserves.htm
http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
The utilization of an accurate currency having the lowest possible cost is the solution to the currency problem. The higher the accuracy the lower will be the cost. The utilization of accurate credit data to move currency to those who earn credit is the solution to the investment problem. Moving credit to those who earn credit is the solution to the incentive problem. Utilization of accurate credit data to move currency to those who earn credit is the solution to the debt problem too; who gives theives credit and more importantly who rewards people who repeat, over and over again, the mistake of giving credit to theives, liars, torturers, and mass murderers. It is the STUPID currency - STUPID! No More Legal Criminals. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18274.htm "Tolerance coupled with passivity is a vice." |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16076312/the_great_iraq_swindle/3
http://www.purpleheartsbook.com/index.php?pag=pht How much does 'cost plus' cost? http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/ I can understand the reluctance to look. How much does that cost? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0735,hentoff,77643,6.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18277.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/white-r1.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Marine_tells_of_order_to_execute_Ha_08302007.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mScWWtRfGQ Here is a quote: “The Internet treats censorship as a defect and routes around it.” John Gilmore, Internet activist |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2007/08/if-there-were-a.html?from=nh
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Salon_Former_CIA_officers_report_Bush_0906.html Salon: Former CIA officers report Bush 'didn't give a fuck about intelligence' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vef03k5i8VI&mode=related&search= |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7M1Se-p7uk&mode=related&search= |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4kTnP5VJ1k&mode=related&search= http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/27/820/38747
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02z3gIg9lcQ&mode=related&search= Last edited on Thu Sep 6th, 2007 05:41 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0709b.asp To all the presidential candidates (not the criminal ones): Anyone looking for a V.P.? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p09s01-coop.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
In North America, fears of some form of North American Union, based on intelligence disinformation, have taken hold. The Amero is a cynical, diversionary intelligence scam, with a money-making dimension (naturally). And all that gabble about the United States being a corporation, States being corporations, the intrusion of Admiralty Law, and so forth, plus other such diversionary tripe, also represents deliberate intelligence obfuscation – designed to divert attention from the historically unprecedented criminality that is being exposed, and, latterly, from the inevitability and reality of The Wanta Plan, which is the ONLY solution on the Table. http://www.worldreports.org/news/79_world_crash_preferre I am inclined to note how describing the criminal conduct of people as a Limited Liability Corporate Nation State is accurate and any plan that moves purchasing power to people who earn it is a Plan that will move purchasing power from criminals. Criminals do not create purchasing power; so where do they get it? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=22519
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2006/08/more_re_wanta_p.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
[size=
What do you call someone who supports torturing mass murderers? Answer: Guilty |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8775995341064689390 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/304-Let-Congress-Know-You-Are-Watching |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.legitgov.org/minot_afb_nukes_oddities.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3hUPP_bdOo&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ewtprn%2Ecom%2F They would never see it. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBUkxvfL_eE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2E911blogger%2Ecom%2Fnode%2F11503 Pardon me? Send comments? http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5t.html
Last edited on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 11:08 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freewayblogger.com/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A29yqYt8qPM Economy: http://www.power-independence.com/view_topic.php?id=264&forum_id=4 Iraq Oil profits were (and continue to be) stolen by terrorists and used to kill American Soldiers. How much?
Note: The reason why the amount of purchasing power flowing to terrorists is unaccounted for should be obvious to anyone willing to know (inside job). Also note: The reason why 'Terrorist' is undefined should be as obvious as the reason why purchasing power is undefined.  http://www.progressivedailybeacon.com/more.php?page=opinion&id=1558 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwoORln51NI&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eprogressivedailybeacon%2Ecom%2Fmore%2Ephp%3Fpage%3Dopinion%26id%3D1558  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_ti9isKKWs&NR=1 "We stand by the ad" http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/abstract.php?rptno=GAO-07-1222T http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I&mode=related&search= http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004259.php
Imagine yesterday? http://youtube.com/watch?v=VafZic-UM_Q&mode=related&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMKCgMuNqzc&mode=related&search= Last edited on Sat Sep 22nd, 2007 01:11 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.infograffiti.org/story.php?title=Bush_Caught_Lying_Outright_About_September_11th |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://burtonmackenzie.blogspot.com/2007/09/instead-of-sending-humans-to-mars-11.html
Your President - fools. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00354 Imagine all the Senators running for president at the same time? Not Voting. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5522575736561316064&q=One+Nation+Under+Seige%7E+Full+Theatrical+Release&pr=goog-sl The President Lied. I won't; if I do I'll wink with my left eye five times - OK? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001153.html Crowd control? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.stansberryonline.com/PRO/0704OILCOL49/WOILH704/200704OIL-COL-49.html Peak Oil? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071003/ap_on_go_ot/terror_exercise;_ylt=AhIXHRSl3kdUAv.jXvskz3qs0NUE
Why does it surprise me to read crimes of this kind when torture and mass murder is legal? Answer: My ability to register criminal conduct is insufficient. How about this: http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I have already mapped out how the U.S. can EASILY return to a prosperous nation by offering each other loans at zero percent interest on home ownership, 1% interest loans on home or business energy production (solar panels, wind generators, etc.), and 2% interest loans on non petroleum based industry - and this fact is irrefutably and principally doable. There is only falsehood and criminals in the way of a prosperous future for mankind. In any town, any city, any county, and network of human beings the fix is merely a simple defeat of falsehood and a transfer of power away from the criminals back to honest productive people – very simply accomplished with currency improvement and it won’t take much improvement from the current state of false currency. Example: http://www.lionev.com/Vehicles.html Any person on the planet having an income (a method of providing something that is exchanged for credit of some kind and in most cases the credit is a form of currency) can buy one of those cars above. It is unthinkable (unless the facts are false) to imagine not being able to afford this car WHILE being able to afford a gasoline powered car. Here:
If a person can afford 45 dollars, then, a person can afford 3 dollars COST. That is the difference between the old and then new. A cost of 45 dollars compared to a cost of 3 dollars. The new age is upon us and the only thing in the way of a cost-less human condition is falsehood and the criminals who perpetuate it - for profit. This is really simple. Everyone profits from cost-less technology because the cost of living reduces. The electric car is a very good example. Illustrated: Imagine having a no percent interest loan on your home combined with a 1 percent interest loan on a home Solar Panel system that can fuel your cars costing 2 percent interest for the cars? What, then, is your cost of living without having to pay Home Mortgage interest, NO ENERGY COST AT ALL, and 2% interest on your car for less time than the car will continue to operate. Eventually you are liberated from interest and your income can be saved toward upgrades when needed. The future will bring lower cost and greater output Solar Panels and lower cost and more efficient electric cars. NO payment from you to the oil industry for gasoline AT ALL unless the cost of taxation includes subsidies to the oil industry. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ewtprn%2Ecom%2F |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
1. People commit crimes not Countries, so, this question serves the criminals by misdirecting focus away from the actual people doing harm to innocent victims. 2. This question continues to focus on affiliation rather than an accurate accounting of individual responsibility. See this please. Iran cannot be responsible and Iran cannot be held accountable. People in Iran can be tortured, bombed, killed, raped, and injured. People in Iran can leave Iran to commit crimes in other countries AND people in Iran can go into Iran to commit crimes in Iran. 3. America is a continent where many people have a common burden or tax. Many, many, and many more people (almost an incomprehensible number of people) pay a tax toward a common BANK or STORE OF VALUE known as U.S.A. The people who currently spend the wealth in the common collection of wealth spend that wealth in a manner that preserves the continued flow of that wealth from the many to them. Who is them? Who are the people sending wealth to them? They, these specific spenders and controllers of a very large store of wealth and power, falsify any information that can and will identify them for what they are accurately. Why ask stupid questions? Why not ask specific questions that identify specific and accurate answers that will focus accountability upon the criminals who are torturing and mass murdering? 4. Criminals torture and murder and if these criminals are not held accountable then, of course, the number of people tortured and murdered will increase in proportion to our inability to account for the actions of the actual criminals committing the actual crimes. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18515.htm If a person is told that the brown smelly stuff stuck on his shoes is chocolate pudding will the person automatically believe this lie when the stuff smells like shit, and looks like shit, does someone really have to taste it? After tasting the shit does someone go on believing it is chocolate pudding? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/12/61544/632 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWkGhV3PsLo |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski193.html I'm posting this here because a vice president is needed here. Here here. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.10questions.com/?search=Ghf1ILZQ2Ls&l=ccforum&ans=quest&all=1&menu= |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/engelhardt/engelhardt297.html
http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/052505/ Last edited on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 10:59 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,2195730,00.html A clean computer hard drive can be placed on the shelf as a back up. The infected hard drive can be wiped clean with a reformat. The computer can be started with the hard drive on the shelf and the old hard drive (infected but reformated) can be used to make a new copy for the shelf (a third hard drive can also be used just in case the reformat does not completely clean the back up). The computer can then be hooked back up to the network. If there is no 'back-up' on the shelf, then, a blank hard drive must have the operating system loaded from scratch. The cost of down time for all the computers suffering from a 'virus' includes all the data lost (not backed up) and this 'cost' can be financial data. Example: Did you pay your bill on time? How much money is in your savings account? The term 'wipe clean' can be meaningless or meaningful. Exactly |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2007-10-21T084055Z_01_COL538982_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-IRAQ-1-COL.XML |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/General_claims_Bush_gave_marching_orders_1022.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Rumsfeld_hit_with_torture_complaint_while_1026.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2006/Feb/02-767147.html
A. The U.S. Government cannot 'favor'. The U.S. Government is a 'legal' entity having no capacity for any emotion, thought, judgment, and morality. B. The statement assumes DEBT to be 'a matter of fact'. B is worth further inspection. Who is held accountable for a bad loan? Who is responsible? http://kineticreaction.blogspot.com/2007/10/confessions-of-economic-hitman.html The assumption of corruptibility is a manifestation of half of (half true) game theory. The other half of game theory is 'cooperation'. Here is a graphic illustration: http://prisonersdilemma.groenefee.nl/ Last edited on Sun Oct 28th, 2007 05:05 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18633.htm
http://www.ccrjustice.org/
http://www.ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/urgent-appeal-filed-united-nations-special-rapporteurs-because-french-prosec
Human beings don't apologize for torture; as a rule. It is uncivilized. It is evil. It is torturous. If the 'authorities' are torturing, then, they are evil. This is simple. Last edited on Mon Oct 29th, 2007 04:24 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6jOXBVIUrE |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200710/POL20071029a.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/?p=396Lovelock does have some suggestions on how to improve the situation. He suggests cutting greenhouse gas emissions anyway, as they may slow the pace of global warming. He also advocates saving natural forests. He still believes, however, that humans will have to adapt to the inevitable changes global warming will bring. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/mar2006/2006-03-24-05.asp
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.opensecrets.org/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Vice President Cheney's repeated warnings that a second large scale terrorist attack on America is under preparation, with the support of Iran. That is here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18655.htm How about a google on that? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Vice+President+Cheney%27s+repeated+warnings+that+a+second+large+scale+terrorist+attack+on+America+is+under+preparation%2C+with+the+support+of+Iran. Here is something: http://www.bilderberg.org/nwo2007.htm How about a narrower search for Cheney, terrorist, threat? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cheney+terrorist+threat How about Iran america attack? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Iran+America+Attack Nothing new on Cheney conditioning the flock? In the U.S., under the Vigilant Shield 2008 war games (initiated in September, 2007) and the TOPOFF anti-terrorism exercises, some form of nuclear terrorist attack on American soil had been envisaged. The roles of Russia and China had also been contemplated. The latter would be “a likely scenario” had the U.S. attacked Iran and as a result Russia and China had decided to intervene. [34] Under Vigilant Shield 2007, held in 2006, the possibility of a nuclear war with Iran’s allies, Russia and China, had been contemplated in the war games scenario. Google for Vigilant Shield: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Vigilant+Shield http://www.northcom.mil/News/2007/083007.html http://www.northcom.mil/News/2007/VS-08_fact_sheet.pdf
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2006/10/the_vigilant_shield_07_exercis.html
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2005/10/nuclear_war_in_alabama.html
Last edited on Sat Nov 3rd, 2007 04:47 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.truthdig.com/dig/item/20060207_president_jonah_redux/
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5832390545689805144 The Revolution will not be Televised |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18687.htm On a brighter note: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/09/1455244 Friday, November 9th, 2007 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/47/17936
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18732.htm Lies cost http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5399796928596929639 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/67410/
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18744.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18748.htm
Last edited on Tue Nov 20th, 2007 03:12 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
If the idea is to prosper, then, people will need to accurately exchange prosperous activity and this desired end requires a desirable means. Ron Paul intends to use Gold as currency as a means of accomplishing a specific end. The writer above equates that intention with business as usual. I think differently. So long as Ron Paul does not make competitive currencies illegal, then, the Gold Currency Legal Tender for the U.S. National Government fact will not 'out-law' competition and will not create a currency monopoly such as our current costly currency system is today. Think in terms of market anarchism and you may get the idea. Do not monopolize your thinking by limiting your vocabulary with terms like "Privatize" and "Public". Try to improve the accuracy of the thought process with words like "Voluntary" and "Involuntary". Accurate and Inaccurate If a Ron Paul were to make Gold as Legal Tender (as currency), then, how will that currency stand the test of free market competition (not Black Market or 'outlawed' competition)? What would the exchange rate for anyone in the U.S. be if anyone works for and legally earns any of the following currencies? Yaun Yen Euro Google dollars Microsoft money Is it impossible to imagine being paid, working for, and spending anything but DOLLARS? If so, then, you have found a huge COST. The COST is FALSEHOOD. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://seekingalpha.com/article/54831-the-5-stages-of-grieving-over-the-u-s-dollar There is another perspective on currency. It has a chart:  Look here: http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904 Replace that chart above with a NEW CURRENCY. Make the new currency accurate and make the new currency COST-LESS. How will the new currency EXCHANGE with the DOLLAR? If you turn your Dollars in sooner, then, what will you get for your Dollars sooner? If you turn your Dollars in later, then, what will you get for your Dollars later? What will YOU get? If you don't know, then, you are probably going to be late. You may even be stuck with the dollar. Why? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Washington's goal from all this is clear, but why now? Last July, Chavez announced he'd be sending Venezuela's National Assembly (AN) a proposed list of constitutional reforms to debate, consider and vote on. Under Venezuelan law, the President, National Assembly or 15% of registered voters (by petition) may propose constitutional changes. Under articles 342, 343, 344 and 345, they must then be debated three times in the legislature, amended if needed, and then submitted to a vote that requires a two-thirds majority to pass. Finally within 30 days, the public gets the last word, up or down, in a national referendum. It represents the true spirit of democracy that's unimaginable in the US where elitists control everything, elections are a sham, and the people have no say. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18755.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.celsias.com/2007/11/20/the-presidential-forum-on-global-warming-and-america%e2%80%99s-energy-future/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/11/369023.shtmlIRAN: The Neocon Agenda to Sacrifice the Fifth Fleet – The New Pearl Harbor |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.ni4d.us/ I voted yes. The people are the governors. This is an indesputable fact. No people - no governors. Which ones? Currenty the ones governing are legal criminals who torture and mass murder. If something is not done to 'govern' their torturing and mass murdering, then, more people will be tortured and mass murdered. Good people do not need to torture and murder the torturing mass murderers - just take away their license to kill. Don't feed them more and more power. Stop feeding the legal criminals. They can work an honest job or depend upon charity. If the torturing mass murderes still want to torure and mass murder, then, they will have to get their own hands dirty. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www2.irna.ir/occasion/turismo-en-iran/descubra-Iran/La-mujer-irani/la_mujer.htm |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19194.htm
OK PEOPLE LISTEN UP I am going to repeat something by Gary North that will introduce the way out of this crazy mess. Gary North may be confused - I am not. Here is the link: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north512.html Here is the quote:
The president (or even the local legal crime boss) declares an open and free market in money. That means exactly what it means. Anyone can print money for anything. People may say: "ARE YOU CRAZY?" And the answer is: "Look in the mirror" While looking in the mirror ask yourself if you can be trusted with printing money? What happened? Did you say: "No; I cannot be trusted with printing money because I would print too much of it." DUH! Go back and read (if you have the time and energy) Gary North's expose of our current currency situation and then go back to the mirror and ask yourself if you could be trusted with the job of printing money. Now; can you trust known torturing mass murderer's with the job of printing YOUR money? Please remove any notions of TRUST that may linger in your subconscious concerning the current people who supply monetary currency. Wipe that slate clean and use your own brain to follow your own plan for supplying the monetary currency that you use to exchange value with other people who also want to exchange value. I can offer my plan as a base for you to gauge or judge the validity of your own plan. You may try to imagine printing your own money at home just to start things off in your own mind. This isn't too hard because people now have their own personal checks and their own personal credit and debit cards. Your check book and credit/debit cards are your personal money. You print them or add to them or deduct from them the value in them and you don't ever have to see ONE DOLLAR BILL (federal reserve note). The fuss is caused by the FEDERAL RESERVE CORPORATION SYSTEM. Get rid of it sooner - rather than later. Anyway - your own plan is going to arrive at a problem if and when you want more now than what you have now. This is called borrowing - of course. If you can print your own money, then, you can borrow from your own self as much as you want and you can charge yourself whatever interest rate you want - see? Think about that awhile. This isn't rocket science. You want to save money, for example, because natural gas prices are costing you 100 dollars a month in the winter and you want to save money on electricity which is costing you 100 dollars a month all year long. You also want to save money because gasoline prices are costing you another 100 dollars a week (suppose that you have a job that requires a lot of driving). Suppose that you want to save up to 7,000 dollars a year by reducing those costs (natural gas, electricity, gasoline). 100 times 6 months equals 600 100 times 12 months equals 1,200 100 times 52 equals 5,200 600 plus 1,200 plus 5,200 equals 7,000 In other words you want to give yourself a raise (for doing the same amount of work) by saving those costs. You can stop using all those things and save that much money. You can save that much money for 10 years and have 70,000 dollars worth of money (that money would have gone to the gas, electric, and gasoline people). Suppose now that 70,000 dollars buys you a complete Solar Powered electric generator, an electric heating unit (or an electric to hydrogen gas generator for home heating) and one of those new electric cars. Now you have (after 10 years of no electricity, no natural gas, and no gasoline for your car); now you have electricity for free, home heating for free, and free gasoline for your car and you now have this for the next 25 years (guaranteed by the Solar Panel manufacturer) or longer. 35 years time (or more) you pay nothing to the electric company, natural gas company, or gasoline company. Please go back to the numbers. 10 years of saving to KEEP your 70,000 dollars worth of earning value (assuming that you produce something of value and sell that something of value rather than steal it like the legal criminals steal). You then dump that cash into the Solar Panel Market and the Hydrogen Gas Market (or electric home heating unit market) and the Electric Car Market so you too can be your own Electric Company, Natural Gas Company (hydrogen), and Gasoline Company (you fill up your car with your own electricity). 70,000 dollar worth (after 10 years of savings) goes into the new industry and you get all the stuff you need to make your own POWER for the next 25 (or more) years. Number again: 7,000 dollars a year for 10 years (NO ELECTRICITY, NO HOME HEATING, NO GASOLINE FOR TRANSPORTATION FOR 10 YEARS) equals: 70,000 dollars worth of SAVINGS You then buy the next 25 years of electricity, natural gas, and fuel for your car (and the car) with the savings. Look: 25 TIMES 7,000 EQUALS 175,000 dollars See this? You save 70,000 and then buy 175,000 No one is going to GIVE you 175,000 for your 70,000 What if, on the other hand, you can BORROW from YOUR OWN 175,000 and use that MONEY to buy the Solar Panels, the Home Heating (electric or hydrogen), and the Electric Car NOW? You borrow that money from yourself and you send that money to the Solar Panel guys, to the Home Heating Unit guys, and to the Electric Car guys. You receive the Solar Panels, the home heating unit, and the Electric Car and for the next 10 years you pay off that loan with the money you would have spent on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Gasoline? See? Borrowing is actually INVESTING. If you loan money to yourself and you don't invest the money, then, your bills go up. If you loan money to yourself and you invest the money into something that will generate more POWER, then, your bills go down. Did you not see the significance? Suppose you do nothing at all, no savings, no borrowing, no investing, and you proceed to pay out 7,000 dollars for the next 25 years time. 7,000 times 25 equals $175,000.00 Now suppose that you can, in fact, borrow from yourself (without interest) and you call the Solar Panel guys up, you call the electric or home heating guys up, and you call the Electric car company guys up TODAY and TOMMORROW (or next week) you start generating your own cost-less POWER for the next 25 years. You have the potential after investing (by borrowing from yourself) to wipe out your electric bill, your home heating bill, and your gasoline bill for the next 25 years or so (and that guarantee on production for the Solar Panels may be increasing NOW because people are investing in Solar Panels NOW). A. You do nothing for the next 25 years and PAY $175,000.00 B. You borrow from yourself and produce 175,000 worth of something See the difference? How much does it now cost to wipe out your electric bill (100 per month all year) natural gas bill (100 per month in winter) and gasoline bill (100 per week)? If it cost 175,000 to eliminate those costs, then, there would be no REASON to go through all that trouble (calling up someone) except, of course, the IDEA is to move away from DEPENDENCE and move toward INDEPENDENCE. See? What happens if the POWER goes out? What happens if the price of electricity doubles? What happens if the price of Natural Gas doubles? What happens if the price of Gasoline doubles? Here is one electric car that is now produced:  The cost starts at 19,000 Solar Panels just went from 'affordable' at 6 dollars per watt (to produce) to 1 dollar a watt according to this: http://www.solveclimate.com/blog/20071219/1-watt-itunes-solar-energy-has-arrived Hydrogen from water, too, is now happening and very affordable; and electric home heating units are already widely marketed. So...why would anyone do nothing? This: A. Continue to pay high prices for POWER? Need I remind anyone who may have a child nearing DRAFT age that the price for POWER may include the slow torturous and violent death of your loved ones (including you) - for power - for profit? I haven't even moved, again, (with this note) to MORTGAGE INTEREST POWER. How much to you pay for POWER? See? Last edited on Sun Jan 27th, 2008 01:00 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/09/spoonamore-reveals-plan-to-steal-next.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20984.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21406.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski230.htmlWe also cannot deny that our foreign policy specifically and the state generally exhibits a strong streak of narcissism and a scary superiority complex. This is not new for the patient, but these symptoms became more marked during and after the Civil War. When a child exhibits narcissism and feels superior to his peers and others, generally we credit lenient and indulgent parenting. The parent of state, and its foreign policy, was the Constitution, but it passed away quietly decades ago, after a long illness. Apparently no one recognized this, as the state made, and continues to make, constant references to the Constitution even as it runs far afield of its words and spirit. Those are the words of my preferred V.P., the person I thought would compliment my regime during my campaign (on-line) for president of the Limited Liability Corporate Nation State (here in North America). I stopped reading that link, those words, at the quote above and at that point I began typing this response for a reason. The reason is to link those words with words written in a book that I am currently reading. I’ll link to the book and then I’ll quote the words next. http://www.amazon.com/Failed-States-Assault-Democracy-American/dp/0805079122
I’m very much in agreement with my preferred V.P. Karen Kwiatkowski and this illustration of narcissism attributed to The U.S.A., where the idea is to see how the State behaves badly, as “it” goes around torturing and mass murdering for profit. The State, if it were a single human being, is a very bad criminal, since “it” behaves no differently than a serial killer, a torturing mass murdering sociopath. I get that part. The part that appears to be missing is the part where specific people do specific things so as to accomplish specific goals at specific times in specific places. Once the reasons for these sociopathic criminal thoughts and actions are accurately identified, the observer of this phenomenon can then reasonably predict what the sociopaths will do next, and by that power, it seems to me, a reasonable defense can be dreamed up and executed. What do you think? Example: If those bad guys and gals really do find it to be in their best interest to secure power in all its forms (psychological and psychical power: political and economic power), then us guys and gals, the defenders of liberty and all, must figure out why they do it. Why do the bad guys consistently plan on and then execute the plan to secure power in all its forms? What is the reasoning behind this madness? If the good people, the ones who defend liberty and all that, can see why power in so interesting, then perhaps the good people may also see the necessity of gaining that power stuff – in all its forms. Now the conflict becomes more obvious, it seems to me, and it may be a good idea to begin plans that intend to secure power for us good people sooner rather than too late, leaving one possible sore point. How do we get power, and what are we willing to do to get power, and what exactly isn’t on the list of things that we should do, as we contemplate the path ahead, the path that leads to power-independence. In other words: do we have to join them to beat them? Do we have to become that which we abhor? Is it really necessary, in this quest for power, to injure innocent people in the process? The answer is clearly no. No, people, we do not have to plan on and follow through with the plan to injure innocent people for anything, let alone our dreams of prosperity for posterity. Liberty does not demand sacrifice of the innocent. Liberty does however require that the liberated ones gain power over the criminals, even the criminals who don the sheep suit. I’ll go back to reading my preferred V.P.’s commentary. Had I gained the power to contend for and gain the job of President of the United States of America, I’d have been in a position to have a talk with Dear Karen Kwiatkowski. We would have had to discuss these things in detail, and I think it would have been important to document such things and even broadcast the exchange on the network. “The President Show” playing all day long – now that would be “transparent”. Last edited on Wed Jun 3rd, 2009 12:23 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Running? Write in |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
REAL NEWS End the FED Hi, I started and stopped the REAL NEWS report above. I started it because I know that this is REAL NEWS. This topic cuts to the HEART of what I call legal crime. I stopped viewing the report at the beginning of the report so as to start this offering - this part of a possible discussion. I'm an out-law, because I offer parts of discussions. Discussion is effectively against the law. REAL NEWS is also against the law, but REAL NEWS is an exception to that effective rule. If falsehood, instead of discussion (or real news), was against the law, things would be different. If violence (such as mass murder and torture) were against the law (which it isn't), things would be different. Paul Jay (any relation to John Jay ?) opens the report by stating some facts, I see these facts as half true facts, but that is because I see things from a perspective that doesn't have the "Emperor has beautiful clothes on" filter working. I see congress as they are, mostly lying, cheating, torturing, and mass murdering criminals - who happen to have the power to do so legally - legal criminals - and therefore, my filter (a more accurate one since I see that the emperor is naked, the emperor doesn't have any clothes on whatsoever, not beautiful clothes, not fashionable clothes, no clothes what-so-ever), therefore the facts presented by Paul Jay, concerning the fight to end The Fed, are half true facts, when seen through the filters I employ. I have competitive filters, not necessarily the best filters. Competition forces the quality of filters up, and competition forces the cost (or price) of filters down. How much does it cost a person if a person uses the "emperor is wearing beautiful clothes" filters? HereHere is a score card on that last question - and I'm going to return to the REAL NEWS. I stopped viewing the report at the point where The New Deal is mentioned. I can confirm eyewitness reports concerning the folly of The New Deal, from the perspective of an honest productive person, a person who produced economic power, and I can confirm by way of specific data, a money trail, that The New Deal was seen as a source of income, an effective confidence scheme, only for those people who did profit from that legal crime spree. In other, more graphic, words: The New Deal score card: 1. Honest product people paid for The New Deal and were tortured and mass murdered paying the price of The New Deal 2. Legal criminals, planning and then executing The New Deal, increased their income with that specific legal crime during it's reign of terror. The paper trail of The New Deal includes the thing that became known as World War II. If you think I am the one seeing our world through false filters, then we can put our competitive filters to the test, looking forward instead of backwards, we can drop this Real News Report, and look toward World War III, as The Dollar Hegemony faces competition focused currently on such places as Iran. We won't do that, because discussion is against the law, and my filter only challenges your filter in the sense that time will pass and the future facts will prove which filter is the higher quality filter - at the lower cost (price). If World War III does happen, as World War II did happen, then legal crime will proceed as planned, and I'll know this fact. If World War III doesn't happen, then my money is on The FED bubble bursting. No more of this: Reset this back to zero The Dollar Hegemony will cause World War III or the people running it will have to move their power to Asia and start over in Asia. In the land that once was America the people running The Dollar Hegemony will have no more power. What the honest productive people in the land that once was America do with the power they earn at that point, having avoided World War III, is anyone's guess. My money is on home grown power, Solar Panels, Electric Cars, CO2 eating Algae fuel, and Modular Greenhouse Vertical Farming - but that may just be me dreaming of utopia . Back to the report by REAL NEWS with Paul Jay - for me. I stopped at 8.03 in the video stream. Before moving on I will offer an competitive example of this NEWS being propagated within this report on The FED. My version is to take a different angle entirely. I am going to offer the reader a way to see how political economy works without all the falsehood. Suppose that we turn back time to that time just before the the people running the money monopoly (The FED = legal criminals) caused the business cycle to go from upswing, to peak, and then into rapid downswing. You can see that any way you want, just know that "the economy" was booming and then "the economy" went bust, it did, and that is the main point. From that point look at a possible plan and then a possible execution of the plan that could be set in motion now, and this plan could have been set in motion back then right when "the economy" crashed. The plan (to allow the reader to see things more clearly by offering a competitive viewpoint = a different angle of view, not "the establishment" viewpoing): The politically powerful people create two products and these two products are offered to anyone, in or out of, America. Product 1: A zero interest loan to anyone with a good credit rating (such as a FICO score) for a brand new home mortgage and/or a brand new (Newer Deal) business mortgage at zero percent interest. Product 2: A 1 percent interest loan to anyone buying Product 1, and this loan is strictly offered for power producing purchases; whereby the purchase is accurately measurable for its capability of producing more power. An example: Honest Joe working man, and Honest Jane working woman buy product 1 and lower their monthly payments by roughly half for their mortgage on their home. Those two people also start a new business or if they already have a business, which is likely since they have a high FICO score, they cut their monthly business mortgage costs in half. Now Honest Joe and Jane have more money every month as a result of product 1. Joe and Jane also buy product 2 and they install Solar Panels at home and at the office and with that purchase they cut their utility costs down by roughly 10%, and that savings includes the additional cost of 1% interest payed out to The Newer Deal (the people producing, offering, selling, and maintaining products 1 and 2 = The Newer Deal). Joe and Jane also use Product 2 to get 4 new electric cars and by doing that they save 80% on transportation fuel costs. One of their old cars was not yet paid for so the savings in interest in that old loan, from a high interest car loan rate, to a 1% Newer Deal loan rate, amounts to more money in Joe and Jane's bank each month added to the Newer Deal transportation fuel savings. Joe and Jane then hatch a plan to pay for the other 3 new Electric cars by starting a taxi business and hiring their son and daughter to drive people around town charging less money compared to the current taxi service, since the current taxi service is still paying high transportation fuel costs. Now, dear reader, you have something real to think about when thinking about what the politicians (the ones who have control over the power of money creation) can or cannot do in reality - in simple terms, real terms, facts, home grown facts, real reality, on a silver platter. I'll pretend that someone thanks me for this offering: you are welcome. Back to Paul Jay - for me. I see a very serous need to call for a reality check at the point where anyone pretends that the Federal Reserve governors, the actual people having the legal license to create dollars, has a mandate at all, never mind the cartoon mandate of reducing inflation and/or decreasing unemployment - or any mandate whatsoever. If the reader wants to cut through all those lies then my suggestion is for the reader to weight into any process of thought designed to know, truly, what the mandate is, for the Federal Reserve, and that suggestion is, for the reader to consider, is the elimination of competition. That is the mandate. All the other mandates are smoke and mirrors - falsehoods. The Federal Reserve must destroy competition. That is a fact. Any competition removes the power held by the people running The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve moves power from the many producers of power to the people running The Federal Reserve. That is not their mandate, that is just what they do, without any other explanation, reason, excuse, or whatnot, that is what they do, they have "the dollar", and that is what they do with the dollar. The score card is right here: Power moving from A to B in real time. If you want to complicate the simple knowledge of what is happening into a confusing misunderstanding then I have to ask you why you want to do that, instead of seeing the facts as they exist in reality. I'm going to return to the Real News report. I see a need to clarify a point raised concerning "Ron Paul Types" as such: The people who have the exclusive license to create legal (U.S.A.) money cause "The Business Cycle" by adding and subtracting legal money. That is what they do, not "some people think" they do, and not "Ron Paul Types" say that they do, that IS what they do, a proven fact - even a confessed fact. To suggest otherwise adds to the cover up. Back to the report - for me. The Ron Paul versus Bush republican comment, where Ron Paul confessed being in support of Dennis Kucinich, more so than Bush republicans (known as Neoconservatives = "Crazies"), on unconstitutional wars of aggression for profit is common sense stuff - a litmus test. Are you: A. Willfully supporting mass murder and torture for profit B. Not A Some people are not A - at least 2 in the U.S. congress. |
|||||||||||
He also hopes to “transform the nation” and to have his face on the penny, an honor traditionally reserved for dead white males. He seems to forget that Lincoln didn’t even want black people voting in Illinois. And really, why would they want to, anyway?