| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page:   ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
|||||||||||||
| Write in Candidate | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19th, 2007 11:21 am |
|
181st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/67410/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Nov 19th, 2007 11:43 am |
|
182nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18744.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 20th, 2007 03:12 pm |
|
183rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18748.htm
Last edited on Tue Nov 20th, 2007 03:12 pm by Joe Kelley |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 20th, 2007 03:13 pm |
|
184th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
If the idea is to prosper, then, people will need to accurately exchange prosperous activity and this desired end requires a desirable means. Ron Paul intends to use Gold as currency as a means of accomplishing a specific end. The writer above equates that intention with business as usual. I think differently. So long as Ron Paul does not make competitive currencies illegal, then, the Gold Currency Legal Tender for the U.S. National Government fact will not 'out-law' competition and will not create a currency monopoly such as our current costly currency system is today. Think in terms of market anarchism and you may get the idea. Do not monopolize your thinking by limiting your vocabulary with terms like "Privatize" and "Public". Try to improve the accuracy of the thought process with words like "Voluntary" and "Involuntary". Accurate and Inaccurate If a Ron Paul were to make Gold as Legal Tender (as currency), then, how will that currency stand the test of free market competition (not Black Market or 'outlawed' competition)? What would the exchange rate for anyone in the U.S. be if anyone works for and legally earns any of the following currencies? Yaun Yen Euro Google dollars Microsoft money Is it impossible to imagine being paid, working for, and spending anything but DOLLARS? If so, then, you have found a huge COST. The COST is FALSEHOOD.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 20th, 2007 03:20 pm |
|
185th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://seekingalpha.com/article/54831-the-5-stages-of-grieving-over-the-u-s-dollar There is another perspective on currency. It has a chart:  Look here: http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904 Replace that chart above with a NEW CURRENCY. Make the new currency accurate and make the new currency COST-LESS. How will the new currency EXCHANGE with the DOLLAR? If you turn your Dollars in sooner, then, what will you get for your Dollars sooner? If you turn your Dollars in later, then, what will you get for your Dollars later? What will YOU get? If you don't know, then, you are probably going to be late. You may even be stuck with the dollar. Why?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Nov 21st, 2007 11:06 am |
|
186th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Washington's goal from all this is clear, but why now? Last July, Chavez announced he'd be sending Venezuela's National Assembly (AN) a proposed list of constitutional reforms to debate, consider and vote on. Under Venezuelan law, the President, National Assembly or 15% of registered voters (by petition) may propose constitutional changes. Under articles 342, 343, 344 and 345, they must then be debated three times in the legislature, amended if needed, and then submitted to a vote that requires a two-thirds majority to pass. Finally within 30 days, the public gets the last word, up or down, in a national referendum. It represents the true spirit of democracy that's unimaginable in the US where elitists control everything, elections are a sham, and the people have no say. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18755.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Nov 21st, 2007 04:26 pm |
|
187th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.celsias.com/2007/11/20/the-presidential-forum-on-global-warming-and-america%e2%80%99s-energy-future/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 27th, 2007 04:00 pm |
|
188th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 27th, 2007 04:00 pm |
|
189th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Nov 27th, 2007 04:02 pm |
|
190th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/11/369023.shtmlIRAN: The Neocon Agenda to Sacrifice the Fifth Fleet – The New Pearl Harbor
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Nov 29th, 2007 02:52 pm |
|
191st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.ni4d.us/ I voted yes. The people are the governors. This is an indesputable fact. No people - no governors. Which ones? Currenty the ones governing are legal criminals who torture and mass murder. If something is not done to 'govern' their torturing and mass murdering, then, more people will be tortured and mass murdered. Good people do not need to torture and murder the torturing mass murderers - just take away their license to kill. Don't feed them more and more power. Stop feeding the legal criminals. They can work an honest job or depend upon charity. If the torturing mass murderes still want to torure and mass murder, then, they will have to get their own hands dirty.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 1st, 2007 07:29 am |
|
192nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www2.irna.ir/occasion/turismo-en-iran/descubra-Iran/La-mujer-irani/la_mujer.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jan 27th, 2008 12:58 pm |
|
193rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19194.htm
OK PEOPLE LISTEN UP I am going to repeat something by Gary North that will introduce the way out of this crazy mess. Gary North may be confused - I am not. Here is the link: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north512.html Here is the quote:
The president (or even the local legal crime boss) declares an open and free market in money. That means exactly what it means. Anyone can print money for anything. People may say: "ARE YOU CRAZY?" And the answer is: "Look in the mirror" While looking in the mirror ask yourself if you can be trusted with printing money? What happened? Did you say: "No; I cannot be trusted with printing money because I would print too much of it." DUH! Go back and read (if you have the time and energy) Gary North's expose of our current currency situation and then go back to the mirror and ask yourself if you could be trusted with the job of printing money. Now; can you trust known torturing mass murderer's with the job of printing YOUR money? Please remove any notions of TRUST that may linger in your subconscious concerning the current people who supply monetary currency. Wipe that slate clean and use your own brain to follow your own plan for supplying the monetary currency that you use to exchange value with other people who also want to exchange value. I can offer my plan as a base for you to gauge or judge the validity of your own plan. You may try to imagine printing your own money at home just to start things off in your own mind. This isn't too hard because people now have their own personal checks and their own personal credit and debit cards. Your check book and credit/debit cards are your personal money. You print them or add to them or deduct from them the value in them and you don't ever have to see ONE DOLLAR BILL (federal reserve note). The fuss is caused by the FEDERAL RESERVE CORPORATION SYSTEM. Get rid of it sooner - rather than later. Anyway - your own plan is going to arrive at a problem if and when you want more now than what you have now. This is called borrowing - of course. If you can print your own money, then, you can borrow from your own self as much as you want and you can charge yourself whatever interest rate you want - see? Think about that awhile. This isn't rocket science. You want to save money, for example, because natural gas prices are costing you 100 dollars a month in the winter and you want to save money on electricity which is costing you 100 dollars a month all year long. You also want to save money because gasoline prices are costing you another 100 dollars a week (suppose that you have a job that requires a lot of driving). Suppose that you want to save up to 7,000 dollars a year by reducing those costs (natural gas, electricity, gasoline). 100 times 6 months equals 600 100 times 12 months equals 1,200 100 times 52 equals 5,200 600 plus 1,200 plus 5,200 equals 7,000 In other words you want to give yourself a raise (for doing the same amount of work) by saving those costs. You can stop using all those things and save that much money. You can save that much money for 10 years and have 70,000 dollars worth of money (that money would have gone to the gas, electric, and gasoline people). Suppose now that 70,000 dollars buys you a complete Solar Powered electric generator, an electric heating unit (or an electric to hydrogen gas generator for home heating) and one of those new electric cars. Now you have (after 10 years of no electricity, no natural gas, and no gasoline for your car); now you have electricity for free, home heating for free, and free gasoline for your car and you now have this for the next 25 years (guaranteed by the Solar Panel manufacturer) or longer. 35 years time (or more) you pay nothing to the electric company, natural gas company, or gasoline company. Please go back to the numbers. 10 years of saving to KEEP your 70,000 dollars worth of earning value (assuming that you produce something of value and sell that something of value rather than steal it like the legal criminals steal). You then dump that cash into the Solar Panel Market and the Hydrogen Gas Market (or electric home heating unit market) and the Electric Car Market so you too can be your own Electric Company, Natural Gas Company (hydrogen), and Gasoline Company (you fill up your car with your own electricity). 70,000 dollar worth (after 10 years of savings) goes into the new industry and you get all the stuff you need to make your own POWER for the next 25 (or more) years. Number again: 7,000 dollars a year for 10 years (NO ELECTRICITY, NO HOME HEATING, NO GASOLINE FOR TRANSPORTATION FOR 10 YEARS) equals: 70,000 dollars worth of SAVINGS You then buy the next 25 years of electricity, natural gas, and fuel for your car (and the car) with the savings. Look: 25 TIMES 7,000 EQUALS 175,000 dollars See this? You save 70,000 and then buy 175,000 No one is going to GIVE you 175,000 for your 70,000 What if, on the other hand, you can BORROW from YOUR OWN 175,000 and use that MONEY to buy the Solar Panels, the Home Heating (electric or hydrogen), and the Electric Car NOW? You borrow that money from yourself and you send that money to the Solar Panel guys, to the Home Heating Unit guys, and to the Electric Car guys. You receive the Solar Panels, the home heating unit, and the Electric Car and for the next 10 years you pay off that loan with the money you would have spent on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Gasoline? See? Borrowing is actually INVESTING. If you loan money to yourself and you don't invest the money, then, your bills go up. If you loan money to yourself and you invest the money into something that will generate more POWER, then, your bills go down. Did you not see the significance? Suppose you do nothing at all, no savings, no borrowing, no investing, and you proceed to pay out 7,000 dollars for the next 25 years time. 7,000 times 25 equals $175,000.00 Now suppose that you can, in fact, borrow from yourself (without interest) and you call the Solar Panel guys up, you call the electric or home heating guys up, and you call the Electric car company guys up TODAY and TOMMORROW (or next week) you start generating your own cost-less POWER for the next 25 years. You have the potential after investing (by borrowing from yourself) to wipe out your electric bill, your home heating bill, and your gasoline bill for the next 25 years or so (and that guarantee on production for the Solar Panels may be increasing NOW because people are investing in Solar Panels NOW). A. You do nothing for the next 25 years and PAY $175,000.00 B. You borrow from yourself and produce 175,000 worth of something See the difference? How much does it now cost to wipe out your electric bill (100 per month all year) natural gas bill (100 per month in winter) and gasoline bill (100 per week)? If it cost 175,000 to eliminate those costs, then, there would be no REASON to go through all that trouble (calling up someone) except, of course, the IDEA is to move away from DEPENDENCE and move toward INDEPENDENCE. See? What happens if the POWER goes out? What happens if the price of electricity doubles? What happens if the price of Natural Gas doubles? What happens if the price of Gasoline doubles? Here is one electric car that is now produced:  The cost starts at 19,000 Solar Panels just went from 'affordable' at 6 dollars per watt (to produce) to 1 dollar a watt according to this: http://www.solveclimate.com/blog/20071219/1-watt-itunes-solar-energy-has-arrived Hydrogen from water, too, is now happening and very affordable; and electric home heating units are already widely marketed. So...why would anyone do nothing? This: A. Continue to pay high prices for POWER? Need I remind anyone who may have a child nearing DRAFT age that the price for POWER may include the slow torturous and violent death of your loved ones (including you) - for power - for profit? I haven't even moved, again, (with this note) to MORTGAGE INTEREST POWER. How much to you pay for POWER? See? Last edited on Sun Jan 27th, 2008 01:00 pm by Joe Kelley |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Sep 30th, 2008 09:08 am |
|
194th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/09/spoonamore-reveals-plan-to-steal-next.html
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Oct 11th, 2008 07:42 pm |
|
195th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20984.htm
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Dec 8th, 2008 02:15 pm |
|
196th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21406.htm
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jun 3rd, 2009 12:07 pm |
|
197th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski230.htmlWe also cannot deny that our foreign policy specifically and the state generally exhibits a strong streak of narcissism and a scary superiority complex. This is not new for the patient, but these symptoms became more marked during and after the Civil War. When a child exhibits narcissism and feels superior to his peers and others, generally we credit lenient and indulgent parenting. The parent of state, and its foreign policy, was the Constitution, but it passed away quietly decades ago, after a long illness. Apparently no one recognized this, as the state made, and continues to make, constant references to the Constitution even as it runs far afield of its words and spirit. Those are the words of my preferred V.P., the person I thought would compliment my regime during my campaign (on-line) for president of the Limited Liability Corporate Nation State (here in North America). I stopped reading that link, those words, at the quote above and at that point I began typing this response for a reason. The reason is to link those words with words written in a book that I am currently reading. I’ll link to the book and then I’ll quote the words next. http://www.amazon.com/Failed-States-Assault-Democracy-American/dp/0805079122
I’m very much in agreement with my preferred V.P. Karen Kwiatkowski and this illustration of narcissism attributed to The U.S.A., where the idea is to see how the State behaves badly, as “it” goes around torturing and mass murdering for profit. The State, if it were a single human being, is a very bad criminal, since “it” behaves no differently than a serial killer, a torturing mass murdering sociopath. I get that part. The part that appears to be missing is the part where specific people do specific things so as to accomplish specific goals at specific times in specific places. Once the reasons for these sociopathic criminal thoughts and actions are accurately identified, the observer of this phenomenon can then reasonably predict what the sociopaths will do next, and by that power, it seems to me, a reasonable defense can be dreamed up and executed. What do you think? Example: If those bad guys and gals really do find it to be in their best interest to secure power in all its forms (psychological and psychical power: political and economic power), then us guys and gals, the defenders of liberty and all, must figure out why they do it. Why do the bad guys consistently plan on and then execute the plan to secure power in all its forms? What is the reasoning behind this madness? If the good people, the ones who defend liberty and all that, can see why power in so interesting, then perhaps the good people may also see the necessity of gaining that power stuff – in all its forms. Now the conflict becomes more obvious, it seems to me, and it may be a good idea to begin plans that intend to secure power for us good people sooner rather than too late, leaving one possible sore point. How do we get power, and what are we willing to do to get power, and what exactly isn’t on the list of things that we should do, as we contemplate the path ahead, the path that leads to power-independence. In other words: do we have to join them to beat them? Do we have to become that which we abhor? Is it really necessary, in this quest for power, to injure innocent people in the process? The answer is clearly no. No, people, we do not have to plan on and follow through with the plan to injure innocent people for anything, let alone our dreams of prosperity for posterity. Liberty does not demand sacrifice of the innocent. Liberty does however require that the liberated ones gain power over the criminals, even the criminals who don the sheep suit. I’ll go back to reading my preferred V.P.’s commentary. Had I gained the power to contend for and gain the job of President of the United States of America, I’d have been in a position to have a talk with Dear Karen Kwiatkowski. We would have had to discuss these things in detail, and I think it would have been important to document such things and even broadcast the exchange on the network. “The President Show” playing all day long – now that would be “transparent”. Last edited on Wed Jun 3rd, 2009 12:23 pm by Joe Kelley |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jan 18th, 2011 10:14 am |
|
198th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Running? Write in
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jan 20th, 2011 12:10 pm |
|
199th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
REAL NEWS End the FED Hi, I started and stopped the REAL NEWS report above. I started it because I know that this is REAL NEWS. This topic cuts to the HEART of what I call legal crime. I stopped viewing the report at the beginning of the report so as to start this offering - this part of a possible discussion. I'm an out-law, because I offer parts of discussions. Discussion is effectively against the law. REAL NEWS is also against the law, but REAL NEWS is an exception to that effective rule. If falsehood, instead of discussion (or real news), was against the law, things would be different. If violence (such as mass murder and torture) were against the law (which it isn't), things would be different. Paul Jay (any relation to John Jay ?) opens the report by stating some facts, I see these facts as half true facts, but that is because I see things from a perspective that doesn't have the "Emperor has beautiful clothes on" filter working. I see congress as they are, mostly lying, cheating, torturing, and mass murdering criminals - who happen to have the power to do so legally - legal criminals - and therefore, my filter (a more accurate one since I see that the emperor is naked, the emperor doesn't have any clothes on whatsoever, not beautiful clothes, not fashionable clothes, no clothes what-so-ever), therefore the facts presented by Paul Jay, concerning the fight to end The Fed, are half true facts, when seen through the filters I employ. I have competitive filters, not necessarily the best filters. Competition forces the quality of filters up, and competition forces the cost (or price) of filters down. How much does it cost a person if a person uses the "emperor is wearing beautiful clothes" filters? HereHere is a score card on that last question - and I'm going to return to the REAL NEWS. I stopped viewing the report at the point where The New Deal is mentioned. I can confirm eyewitness reports concerning the folly of The New Deal, from the perspective of an honest productive person, a person who produced economic power, and I can confirm by way of specific data, a money trail, that The New Deal was seen as a source of income, an effective confidence scheme, only for those people who did profit from that legal crime spree. In other, more graphic, words: The New Deal score card: 1. Honest product people paid for The New Deal and were tortured and mass murdered paying the price of The New Deal 2. Legal criminals, planning and then executing The New Deal, increased their income with that specific legal crime during it's reign of terror. The paper trail of The New Deal includes the thing that became known as World War II. If you think I am the one seeing our world through false filters, then we can put our competitive filters to the test, looking forward instead of backwards, we can drop this Real News Report, and look toward World War III, as The Dollar Hegemony faces competition focused currently on such places as Iran. We won't do that, because discussion is against the law, and my filter only challenges your filter in the sense that time will pass and the future facts will prove which filter is the higher quality filter - at the lower cost (price). If World War III does happen, as World War II did happen, then legal crime will proceed as planned, and I'll know this fact. If World War III doesn't happen, then my money is on The FED bubble bursting. No more of this: Reset this back to zero The Dollar Hegemony will cause World War III or the people running it will have to move their power to Asia and start over in Asia. In the land that once was America the people running The Dollar Hegemony will have no more power. What the honest productive people in the land that once was America do with the power they earn at that point, having avoided World War III, is anyone's guess. My money is on home grown power, Solar Panels, Electric Cars, CO2 eating Algae fuel, and Modular Greenhouse Vertical Farming - but that may just be me dreaming of utopia . Back to the report by REAL NEWS with Paul Jay - for me. I stopped at 8.03 in the video stream. Before moving on I will offer an competitive example of this NEWS being propagated within this report on The FED. My version is to take a different angle entirely. I am going to offer the reader a way to see how political economy works without all the falsehood. Suppose that we turn back time to that time just before the the people running the money monopoly (The FED = legal criminals) caused the business cycle to go from upswing, to peak, and then into rapid downswing. You can see that any way you want, just know that "the economy" was booming and then "the economy" went bust, it did, and that is the main point. From that point look at a possible plan and then a possible execution of the plan that could be set in motion now, and this plan could have been set in motion back then right when "the economy" crashed. The plan (to allow the reader to see things more clearly by offering a competitive viewpoint = a different angle of view, not "the establishment" viewpoing): The politically powerful people create two products and these two products are offered to anyone, in or out of, America. Product 1: A zero interest loan to anyone with a good credit rating (such as a FICO score) for a brand new home mortgage and/or a brand new (Newer Deal) business mortgage at zero percent interest. Product 2: A 1 percent interest loan to anyone buying Product 1, and this loan is strictly offered for power producing purchases; whereby the purchase is accurately measurable for its capability of producing more power. An example: Honest Joe working man, and Honest Jane working woman buy product 1 and lower their monthly payments by roughly half for their mortgage on their home. Those two people also start a new business or if they already have a business, which is likely since they have a high FICO score, they cut their monthly business mortgage costs in half. Now Honest Joe and Jane have more money every month as a result of product 1. Joe and Jane also buy product 2 and they install Solar Panels at home and at the office and with that purchase they cut their utility costs down by roughly 10%, and that savings includes the additional cost of 1% interest payed out to The Newer Deal (the people producing, offering, selling, and maintaining products 1 and 2 = The Newer Deal). Joe and Jane also use Product 2 to get 4 new electric cars and by doing that they save 80% on transportation fuel costs. One of their old cars was not yet paid for so the savings in interest in that old loan, from a high interest car loan rate, to a 1% Newer Deal loan rate, amounts to more money in Joe and Jane's bank each month added to the Newer Deal transportation fuel savings. Joe and Jane then hatch a plan to pay for the other 3 new Electric cars by starting a taxi business and hiring their son and daughter to drive people around town charging less money compared to the current taxi service, since the current taxi service is still paying high transportation fuel costs. Now, dear reader, you have something real to think about when thinking about what the politicians (the ones who have control over the power of money creation) can or cannot do in reality - in simple terms, real terms, facts, home grown facts, real reality, on a silver platter. I'll pretend that someone thanks me for this offering: you are welcome. Back to Paul Jay - for me. I see a very serous need to call for a reality check at the point where anyone pretends that the Federal Reserve governors, the actual people having the legal license to create dollars, has a mandate at all, never mind the cartoon mandate of reducing inflation and/or decreasing unemployment - or any mandate whatsoever. If the reader wants to cut through all those lies then my suggestion is for the reader to weight into any process of thought designed to know, truly, what the mandate is, for the Federal Reserve, and that suggestion is, for the reader to consider, is the elimination of competition. That is the mandate. All the other mandates are smoke and mirrors - falsehoods. The Federal Reserve must destroy competition. That is a fact. Any competition removes the power held by the people running The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve moves power from the many producers of power to the people running The Federal Reserve. That is not their mandate, that is just what they do, without any other explanation, reason, excuse, or whatnot, that is what they do, they have "the dollar", and that is what they do with the dollar. The score card is right here: Power moving from A to B in real time. If you want to complicate the simple knowledge of what is happening into a confusing misunderstanding then I have to ask you why you want to do that, instead of seeing the facts as they exist in reality. I'm going to return to the Real News report. I see a need to clarify a point raised concerning "Ron Paul Types" as such: The people who have the exclusive license to create legal (U.S.A.) money cause "The Business Cycle" by adding and subtracting legal money. That is what they do, not "some people think" they do, and not "Ron Paul Types" say that they do, that IS what they do, a proven fact - even a confessed fact. To suggest otherwise adds to the cover up. Back to the report - for me. The Ron Paul versus Bush republican comment, where Ron Paul confessed being in support of Dennis Kucinich, more so than Bush republicans (known as Neoconservatives = "Crazies"), on unconstitutional wars of aggression for profit is common sense stuff - a litmus test. Are you: A. Willfully supporting mass murder and torture for profit B. Not A Some people are not A - at least 2 in the U.S. congress.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 02:59 pm | Page: ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| Power Independence > Networking > Expanding Connectivity > Write in Candidate | Top |
