Joe Kelley
Administrator
|
The concept offered on these pages is expressed in the title. There is an economic and political expression offered in one sentence that I call Joe's Law. The idea here is to see life from a competitive angle of view, to challenge your own competitive angle of view, and by comparison, the better parts of each view can be judged for validity, so as to improve viewpoints.
As a demonstration, it is suggested for the reader to consider the concept of gaining and maintaining power independence as compared to failing to do so, whereby dependence on potentially costly sources of power, including all forms of slavery, people bear throughout their lives.
So that demonstration is offered as a start, one viewpoint can be further illustrated in 2 cases, the viewpoint of a dependent child, which is an individual born dependent, born with a dependent viewpoint, born with a need to learn how to become independent, and in the second case illustrated now, a slave born into slavery, which can be political slavery, economic slavery, or any other form of slavery, as the dependent slave is also born with a need to learn how to become independent.
Look from the eyes of the newborn in each case, look from your current viewpoint, and in that demonstration, the 2 viewpoints are before your eyes, as your mind imagines what it is like for the dependent, which is also a memory, if not a current experience. Which viewpoint is better? Is the dependent viewpoint ever going to realize the independent viewpoint? Is it true that the dependent viewpoint must first imagine an independent viewpoint before the dependent viewpoint can begin to work effectively toward a truly independent viewpoint?
If that is difficult above then the expression of power independence in one sentence - Joe's Law - may be too much too soon. The idea here is to offer help in understanding what may be a competitive independent viewpoint.
"Power produced into oversupply..." is a process by which people cooperate voluntarily in ways that constitute investment, whereby the intention is to increase the supply of power from a scarce condition to a condition of abundance. Power in this context can be measured as calories, fuel, clean water, nourishing food, skill, knowledge, wisdom, and peace that is earned through the application of accurate accounting of responsibilities.
"Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power..." as a matter of demonstrable fact the condition of scarcity increases price while a condition of abundance decreases price in human economic, voluntary, associations, which involve exchanges of goods and services: political economy. I offer this definition of political economy this way, so as to point out the requirement of peace, through voluntary association, as a requirement because the rules governing economy, just like the rules governing politics, are turned up-side-down when criminals run the processes, like the glue used to run a machine, and the machine is bound up by the glue, and instead of glue the machine requires powerful fuels and lubricants, peace, voluntary cooperation, justice, and accurate accountability. Peace is never gained nor maintained by masters making slaves out of everyone, including themselves.
"Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases..."
Now Joe's Law takes a political turn, but a turn that is in my opinion required in order for the competitive viewpoint to be understood. Money can be a claim made by a counterfeiter, and that money is used to take something of value from the victim of counterfeiting, so that money has the power to purchase only so long as the buyers give up their valuable things in exchange for counterfeit money. As soon as the counterfeit money is accurately accounted as such, the power to purchase with that counterfeit money is lost. The original counterfeiter has taken by deception the valuable (powerful) things earned honestly by the innocent victims of counterfeiting. This is also one way to expose how economic laws are turned up-side-down when criminals run politics, as ought to be known by everyone in America since The Federal Reserve is a criminal organization that prints counterfeit money, and those counterfeiters buy their way into positions of great power over their innocent victims. This can be demonstrated factually in any case where someone has any doubt whatsoever.
Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
In a right-side-up world the simple act of investing - by definition - increases the standard of living while reducing the cost of living at the same time: prosperity for us now and for posterity.
If you do not see it, I can help. If you do see it, then you know more than the great majority of political hackers, frauds, and their minions.
|
