| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page:   ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ...   |
|
|||||||||||||
| Final Editing | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 08:40 pm |
|
541st Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 120 It may be a good idea to slay that Dragon if it is infecting you, or your grandson. italicized it: It may be a good idea to slay that Dragon if it is infecting you or your grandson.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 08:44 pm |
|
542nd Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 120 That is not all that I am saying, but I am saying that much, because I think that that specific point is relevant to your grandson stepping into the battle where that Dragon sleeps. Modified: That is not all that I am saying, but I am saying that much because I think that specific point is relevant to your grandson stepping into the battle where that Dragon sleeps.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 09:09 pm |
|
543rd Post |
|
bear Guest
|
Yipee!!! Look where I am now: Joe’s Law and Joe Slaw both take time to understand. One is hot and spicy with radishes, or so I hear…the other…provides a key to abundance. The recipe for Joe’s Law is shared below. If you want the recipe for Joe Slaw, you will have to ask Joe. Joe’s Law is used here to prove the point that the American public needs to create and begin using competitive forms of currency. And the thought came to mind that it might be fun to add the recipe for Joe's Slaw somewhere at the end of the book...maybe a tribute to funny boy? (It seems to me that you discussed one time a table conversation about Joe's Law and Joe Slaw instigated by your son.) What do you think Joe? A surprise for the reader? Or would that be too frivolous when such important news is being spread? Anyways, when changing my quotes to the different smaller font, and in the process of right justifying the margins with the use of a paragraph return at the end of each paragraph, we may end up with a little space. Do you remember off the top of your head what the page count is that the printer quoted? I used to remember, but have forgotten for some reason. Right now we have 168 pages and I still have pages left to edit. Was it 174?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 09:18 pm |
|
544th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 121 Discussion JOE, I wonder if the word "Discussion" is correct to start this section in the book since this is actually an article you authored, and does not include discussion. Should we remove/replace the word? Or do you think the word is fitting because you welcome discussion?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 09:19 pm |
|
545th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 121 Watch Video: The Fight for Liberty:37 removed 2nd colon: Watch Video: The Fight for Liberty37
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 09:31 pm |
|
546th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 121 Many people may not understand the power struggle being fought as in that link as Ron Paul spearheads defensive action against the offenses perpetrated by the group of people known collectively as The FED. Modified: Many people may not understand the power struggle being fought as captured in that link where Ron Paul spearheads defensive action against the offenses perpetrated by the group of people collectively known as “The FED.”
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 10:28 pm |
|
547th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 That is one sentence in English. It is an explanation of Political Economy and it can be used to answer the types of questions tabled in the link where Ron Paul is fighting against Legal Crime. Added comma: That is one sentence in English. It is an explanation of Political Economy, and it can be used to answer the types of questions tabled in the link where Ron Paul is fighting against Legal Crime.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 10:36 pm |
|
548th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 The FED produces Legal Purchasing Power and therefore the question asked is a question concerning the legal license to produce Legal Purchasing Power. added semicolon and comma: The FED produces Legal Purchasing Power; and therefore, the question asked is a question concerning the legal license to produce Legal Purchasing Power.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 10:37 pm |
|
549th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 Purchasing Power is Purchasing Power with or without the legal license. Purchasing Power is the Power to Purchase and that is an accurately measurable fact. Added comma: Purchasing Power is Purchasing Power with or without the legal license. Purchasing Power is the Power to Purchase, and that is an accurately measurable fact.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 10:53 pm |
|
550th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 First listen to the question asked and then listen to a rephrasing of the question so as to make sense of the question in such a way as to allow for a reasonable answer (removing ambiguity): 1a. Do you think that The FED SHOULD be abolished? 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? Mmodified (removed the word listen because the reader cannot listen to the 2nd question. Also matched words and numbering for easy reading): First, the question asked. Then second, the question rephrased to make sense of the question in such a way to allow for a reasonable answer (removing ambiguity).
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 10:57 pm |
|
551st Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 The reader may be confused even more after reading the revision of the original question, until the reader now uses the revision in conjunction with Joe's Law as such: Modified: The reader may be even more confused after reading the revision of the original question...that is until the reader uses the revision in conjunction with Joe's Law as such:
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 11:02 pm |
|
552nd Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 122 Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while legal purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. Italicized legal: Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while legal purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 11:05 pm |
|
553rd Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 123 Do you think that there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power? And if you don't think there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power, then it may be a good idea to figure out if there is a difference. Added italics and removed the word "And": Do you think that there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power? If you don't think there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power, then it may be a good idea to figure out if there is a difference.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 11:14 pm |
|
554th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 123 Take away all the false window dressing, or pull back the curtain that hides the Wizard of Oz, and what is the accurate, indisputable, answer to those questions? Modified: Take away all the false window dressing, or pull back the curtain that hides the Wizard of Oz…what is the accurate, indisputable answer to those questions?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 24th, 2013 11:19 pm |
|
555th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/24/13 Page 123 If it were not counterfeit, then The FED would be producing wealth. Actual wealth, actual power to purchase, and they would not need an army of liars, an army of thieves, and an army of victims to enforce the value of it, as their money would be as valuable with, or without, the army backing it up. Modified: If it were not counterfeit, then The FED would be producing wealth…actual wealth…actual power to purchase. They would not need an army of liars, an army of thieves, and an army of victims to enforce the value of their “money,” as it would be as valuable with or without the army backing it up.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jul 25th, 2013 10:44 am |
|
556th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/25/13 Page 124 The FED does not produce wealth. Therefore, the things that The FED does produce is something other than wealth. Changed is to are: The FED does not produce wealth. Therefore, the things that The FED does produce are something other than wealth.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jul 25th, 2013 10:48 am |
|
557th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/25/13 Page 124 & 125 & 128 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? Renumbered according to earlier modification:
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jul 25th, 2013 10:53 am |
|
558th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/25/13 Page 124 If all the victims knew better they would stop being victims, they would not wait, and they would suddenly, and irrevocably, choose a more powerful option. added comma after better: If all the victims knew better, they would stop being victims, they would not wait, and they would suddenly, and irrevocably, choose a more powerful option.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jul 25th, 2013 10:55 am |
|
559th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/25/13 Page 125 "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." Henry Ford Modified: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." —Henry Ford
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jul 25th, 2013 10:57 am |
|
560th Post |
|
bear Guest
|
7/25/13 Page 125 Instead of hearings, and even instead of court cases, the former victims would be inventing, producing, and employing forms of competitive purchasing power rather than being forced by effective deceit, and instead of being forced by effective threats of violence, and instead of being forced by effective violence targeting the competitors, into the use of the one Counterfeit Money Produced by The FED. Removed comma before into: Instead of hearings, and even instead of court cases, the former victims would be inventing, producing, and employing forms of competitive purchasing power rather than being forced by effective deceit, and instead of being forced by effective threats of violence, and instead of being forced by effective violence targeting the competitors into the use of the one Counterfeit Money Produced by The FED.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 03:05 pm | Page: ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... |
| Power Independence > Book > Book Resources > Final Editing | Top |
