| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Trusts | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri Jul 19th, 2013 01:25 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Real Estate? Executor De Son Tort Any person who seeks to usurp the position of the general executor of the estate and unlawfully claim the office of Executor without permission is known as an Executor De Son Tort and may be charged with fraud.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 19th, 2013 01:43 pm |
|
2nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
There are only six (6) essential methods possible for conveyance of property rights of Inferior Estates in dispute under the collective Western-Roman laws being Salvage, Seizure, Capture, Arrest, Livery and Resignation: (i) Salvage is the method of conveying allegedly “lost” property, most commonly “lost at sea”; and (ii) Seizure is the method of conveying allegedly “abandoned” property whereby the first person to seize and defend the claim is granted the lawful right of use; and (iii) Capture is the method of conveying allegedly “prized” property in conflict whereby the enemy is defeated; and (iv) Arrest is the method of conveying allegedly “surrendered” property by a prisoner; and (v) Livery is the method of conveying allegedly “alienated” property by a merchant for limited commercial or personal use; and (vi) Resignation is the method of conveying allegedly “disenfranchised” property such as in application, contract, bankruptcy or a court order.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jul 22nd, 2013 03:41 pm |
|
3rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Beginnings (or returning to) enforced Money Monopoly and The Business Psycho? Banking (ii) The Carolingian Empire from 8th Century to 10th Century greatly restricted financial practices of hypothecation (and therefore trade) in preference for the promotion of actual standard coin, which had the effect of creating a “boom-bust” environment due to a lack of capital, rise in corruption and an inability to settle debts effectively; and (iv) In 1306, the network of Ordo Pauperes Templum (Knights Templar) was seized by combined forces of the Genoese and Lavagna under Count Ottobuono Fieschi of Lavagna and the French under King Philip IV of France (1268-1314). In 1339, Simon “Boccanegra” Fieschi took power over Genoa and had himself declared “Doge” including the formation of the second financial system based around Palaces called “Houses” known as the Palazzo delle Compere di San Giorgio or “House of Merchandizing of St George”. Each Palace had a public place for trade out front called the quadrate (public square) and an inner space called the cort (court) for private and exclusive business. The Genoese then established “Houses” managed by noble Genoese families at key locations around the world; and (v) In contrast to the Genoese model of adopting a purely “public/private” model of commerce around a Palace (Palazzo) for financial services, in 1374 the Venetians adopted an ecclesiastical model by modifying St Mark’s Basilica and a created a new sacred space called the “sagrestia” (sacristy) for the operation of the camera di prestiti or “Chamber of Loans”; and What is meant by the words public and private; as in The Fed is a private bank, for example? From here In the case of Venice and the rivals of Venice was the breakup of the Pisan Empire known as Genoa. We see the creation firstly of banking houses and then the forced need for the Venetians to extend what their banks did and the origin of the creation of agent and principal roles. Under the Genoese we see the creation of the Palaces, or Palazzos, the creation of squares at the front and we see this in Venice in point (vi) under Canon 6865, regarding the creation of the plazas for banking. What we see at the time of the Venetians in point (ix) and (x) of Canon 6865 is when the Venetians were under attack, their ability to settle debts by merchants bringing their gold to Venice became prohibitively dangerous and indeed, the Venetians being able to send gold out also became extremely dangerous at the time that Venice was under attack. The cost of Gold as money makes Gold less valuable as money? So to solve this problem, the Venetians radically modified their business practices which we cover in point (ix) of Canon 6865, “The Origins of the Agent and the Principal.” The first agent in history was the creation of the Venetian banking agent known as a ‘chartered accountant.’ These skills were born out of necessity and proved to be the enormous strength of the Venetian banking system from the 16th century and beyond. Point (x) in Canon 6865 covers the next challenges the Venetians overcame which we will cover. That is how private banks became central banks. This was when the Hapsburgs and others started to ex-appropriate the very gold that was underpinning the value of these now sophisticated banks. This required the Pisan and Venetian houses to form alliances directly with Crowns in the creation of Courts of Exchequer. The first was in 1515 under Francis I under the Chambres des comptes (Court of Exchequer) and the second was in 1518 with the House (Bank) of Pisano and King Henry VIII and the Court of Exchequer and the third was 1525 in Sweden through Gustav I and the formation of Kammarkollegium and was the third central bank, the third Court of Exchequer. Private (exclusive) versus Public (collective)? Keep in mind the concept at this time whereby Trust was an agreement to honor exclusive use of specific property and then Estate was created to take power over people (enslave) the "things" on the land? So the concept of Public could have merely meant the concept of Legal Criminals enforcing a claim of ownership of their targeted human victims. We see the origin of the agent which was derived directly out of necessity through the Venetian banking system where now, instead of the merchants coming to the bank with their gold, with their records to settle the accounts, the bank sent their own agents out into the field with those merchants and business was settled, in the first instance in the field. Then it was ratified by the bank when those agents returned with the receipts to the bank to perform an accounting. So the actions known as trade were attacked by criminals who targeted people who used Gold during trades, so the adaptation was the invention of recording transactions in some way and an agency of supposedly accurate accounting (honest) whereby a human being specializing in that work was thereby a job which is obviously an added cost to trade which was only made affordable relative to the loss of production created by criminals. Here again is the concept of the pirates being pirated by pirates; since the supposed authorities are pirates themselves, slave masters dealing in slave trade, legal criminals claiming ownership of land and all the things (including human beings) on that land, and their Honor among Thieves only works when everyone agrees to that specific Honor among Thieves. As soon as some of the targets slaves begin to dishonor that Honor among Thieves, as soon as the Monopoly of Crime encounters competitors in the Crime Business, there is an increase in the costs paid out of the profits stolen by the Legal Criminals, and therefore they adapt with the invention of Agents who are Official Accountants keeping the books on Trades done among all the Thieves who Honor that specific Monopoly of Legal Crime. Next is a reference to the history of turning Liberty into Crime made Legal, or to be more specific it is the turning of Credit into Debt: Credit turned into Debt (iv) This system existed until its dramatic corruption in 14th Century by the Venetians in association with the Roman Cult by its inversion thus perversely creating debt into an asset and debits into credit. (ix) Contrary to deliberately false information, it appears the Venetian - Pisan method of double entry bookkeeping faced two (2) significant obstacles within England until a more complete work was published in 1636 called “The Merchants’ Mirror or Directions for the Perfect ordering and Keeping of His Accounts”: (1) the level of numeracy in England by 1500 was less than four percent (4%) of the population, well lower than Continental Europe and (2) a persistent refusal by the educated classes of England to adopt the illogic of flipping income to debit and expenses to credit as per the Venetian Ecclesiastical system of accounting. However, by the mid 18th Century, the Kingdom of Great Britain had become an accounting powerhouse through its banking and merchant practices in adopting the Venetian Vatican standards of accounting. That is a common theme. Turning honest productive actions into dishonest destructive actions. A method of accounting that works productively for volunteers is no good for the Legal Criminals, so the idea is to replace, or usurp, the productive, honest, accurate, version with a counterfeit form that just so happens to lend moral and material support to the criminals who invent, produce, and maintain the Monopoly, Criminal, Counterfeit, version. The word Exchequer is derived from the Anglaise word eschequier meaning “chessboard” in direct reference to the chessboard literally referring to all commerce and trade of the realm and the public “squares” of commerce consistent with 14th Century “plaza” banking model. Thus the phrase “Court of Exchequer” literally means "Private Public (Bank)". That is again a reference to the obvious fraud today where The FED is supposed to be a "private" bank yet it is the only bank having a license to print legal debt notes which just happen to be the only accepted form of money required by The IRS for "National Debt." So what we see is that the role of agent was originally formed out of necessity as the duly authorized representative of a private bank and then a central bank or exchequer. The key words under the definition of Canon 6859 are the words, “private franchise formed through the Crown through the General Executor of the Estate as the Principal of the Crown, the Minister Plenipotentiary of the Crown, to enclose everything within regarding the funds. This is the chessboard in the game of chess. They don’t want you to know this and they cannot afford for you to know this. That is why the exchequer is never defined as private; it is always obscured and it is desperately described as coming from a much, much earlier provenance than the 16th century. Most of the flaws within the statutes and the fraudulent statutes of within English law claim that exchequer originated in the 13th century, which is complete rubbish. Their accounting concepts claimed in the 13th century weren’t invented until the 15th century. It is easily exposed once you see what accounting is. However, like much of their system of fraud, they do not want you to know the origin. Once you know the origin, you know what the principal is. What is the principal? The principal is that franchise, that central bank, the central banker for the estate. Every since the officials of the estate have been paid directly by the central bank which began in the 19th century when the Bank of England was allowed to pay public servants in their own script. Once that started the central bank became not only the controlling franchise in terms of commerce, taxes, and funds, but became the government. THE BANK ALSO BECAME THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ESTATE, OF THE NATION in the 19th century. This is why when you go to court or write in any of your documents and claim that you are the principal or you are acting for the principal those few judges, those few magistrates, or even fewer prosecutors and/or attorneys that know the origin of their law, or the basic competence of their law, just smile. What you have done when you say that you are the principal or that you are acting for the principal, is that you truly do not know the provenance of these most essential terms. If we claim to be the Agent of the Principal we have accepted that we are wholly and totally under the jurisdiction of the government, and the government is the central bank, and the private bank under the control of the families that control the central banks. Now you see that in exchequer, through the original definition, what the real meaning of the Principal is. This is why the government is perfectly happy when people say I am the principal. The government is the principal in their minds, because they were appointed by the processes of the law when the estate was abandoned. They smile all the way to their crime made legal; laughing all the way to their criminal bank. An interest is, of course, a benefit. A benefit means that they become a beneficiary. By becoming a beneficiary it means that the in the role of the Agent and the Principal as the primary agent only someone higher up in the estate can in fact dissolve such an arrangement. That is what they mean regarding when the agent is granted a benefit say in court cases, you have an absolute perversion of the course of justice, a perversion of all known law, a complete perversion of the concept of ‘clean hands’ and there is not a single case in the United States of America that I am aware of now that is conducted with true ‘clean hands.’ What an abomination that is; every single court case has with it a financial claim entered with the Department of Treasury through the UCC whereby the private contractor in the form of the Magistrate or the Judge takes up an interest and forms an irrevocable power of attorney in the matter. They have the controlling power of attorney role in the matter being brought before them. What an abomination and extraordinary perversion that is. How do we deal with it? We appoint an Agent with Power of Attorney. That is what we do. But first we make it clear that the Principal has been replaced and that the powers of the Principal have been revoked and the government can no longer consider itself to be the government of your estate by presumption, assumption, and supposition. We do that by presenting to key areas of the existing system a Notice of the Appointment of the Minister Plenipotentiary. Why can you never, ever, ever stand in court and claim to be the General Executor? If you do that you might as well give up. Why can you never engage in commerce in the role of the General Executor, unless you are dealing directly with an agent as to their agency powers? You should never deal with that directly and that should be up to your primary Agent, your Minister Plenipotentiary. It is because of Clean Hands. The bait and switch works much like highway robbery with criminals seeking to gain any treasures hidden by the targeted victim. The targeted victim is lured into confessing where those hidden treasures may be, so the criminals act, like "good cop bad cop" to lull the targeted victim into a false sense of security. This is much like the Prisoner's Dilemma which can be understood here: Applet
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 23rd, 2013 05:57 am |
|
4th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Example of why the words Public and Private are willfully confused? 1. Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account. 2. Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account. How? In the first case the claim is made that National Interest requires an expense, such as those expenses required when people in the country are being attacked by a foreign POWER. The example here is the attack by The British after The Declaration of Independence in 1776. The people in the country, then called America, would either stand together and defend against attack or not, and there were expenses associated with defense against attack by The British. We need to gain the power to defend ourselves, and so we do what is necessary to defend ourselves, and we do so voluntarily, and it is better to expend our power in defense now, while we have that power, rather than have all our power taken, including our power to defend. So, having that in mind, the concept of We The People, being driven by duty to defend ourselves, as declared in The Declaration of Independence, are in need of cash. Enter zeros into the account, buy now, pay later. So the Central Bankers claim that they are willing to stand in that role, as accountants, to keep the books on those expenses. OK. Who offers which supplies and services consumed in the defensive war effort? How much are they paid after the war is over, when productive, profitable, actions can resume and refill the stores of value that make up an actual power fund, or bank account, such as a silo full of grain, or a generator full of fuel, or a water tank full of water? The public good is seen in this manner, as public service, as a pooling of resources so as to defend against attack as one, for if we do not stand together, we fall individually. Here: 1. Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account. At the end of the Revolutionary War there was Debt owed by each voluntary member of the voluntary Union of defenders, and the accountants hired to keep the books were charged with the responsibility of knowing who gave up anything of value, and who failed to give up anything of value, and here is where the concept of being a solider in time of defensive war is willfully confused. Does the country, or the people in the country, owe a greater debt to the suppliers of boots used by the soldiers, where that pay rate to the supplier of boots is a no-bid contract, an absurdly inflated price, whereby the supplier of boots does not give up anything, where instead the supplier of boots actually profits handsomely by that contract, or do the people in the country, or does the country, owe more to someone who lost their arm, leg, eye, or a family that lost a husband, owing a greater debt to those who give all, instead of owing a greater debt to those who profit from war, who get initially paid with paper, and who are then demanding gold as payment, "on par", for their "service" during defensive war? The Central Bankers claim that they need to add zeros to the Public account for National Interest. There are two sides to this false coin. 1. Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account. 2. Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account. The same people at the same Central Bank add those zeros to the Public account, in defense against attack, in "our National Interest" and then with those zeros in that account those people loan those zeros out at Interest, effectively making a profit from the bounty of collective delusion. Does the "interest" go back to National Interest, or is there suddenly a change of heart whereby the Central Bank is suddenly no longer Public? Now, in point of fact, according to the people at the Central Bank, the Bank is now Private, and therefore the Bank is now required to show a profit, and therefore the Interest payments are filling the banking accounts of the private individuals who own the private bank. The bail-outs are no longer zeros added to the account in desperate times to defend against an army of aggressive military force invading and occupying homes, churches, towns, cities, counties, and States in this country, rather, the appropriate HAT is switched by the Central Bankers, there is suddenly a need to be a private entity in need of balancing their own, individual, separate, set of books. 1. Public Fund, not ours, not in our own, private, interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of socialism. 2. Private fund, ours, not yours, exclusive, not public, for our own interest, for no one but our own interest, not your interest, not the public interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of capitalism. Who do you work for, a public servant might ask, do you work for your own interest, or do you work for National Interest? Some people say, with much in the way of authority, that we all now work for the Central Bank. We are all employed in the work required to fill up The FUND. Follow the money to make sure that the person asked is answering factually. Which money? The fraudulent money?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 23rd, 2013 08:46 am |
|
5th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Bonding Agents (iii) If the court is private and the court officers are privateers, what is the insurance, underwriting, bonds or guarantees to ensure that the court and its officials uphold the public law, any fiduciary obligations, act in good faith and swear to speak the whole truth? In other words if the court is functioning privately by what means is there insurance underwriting to see that the court acts in good faith.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 09:19 am | |
| Power Independence > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Trusts | Top |
