| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Eventually I plan on editing down the questions into a concise form. Episode 5 1:06:00 On the buying price, or penal sum, people paying torturers, Heyday? A document at the Vatican, called Heyday, concerning the payment to torturers to stop torturing. Where is there a copy of this document? Link to Trial by Jury by Lysander Spooner and the bounty on the King, or the fine for the murder of the King Margin, commission, piece of the action, percentage, incentive, Judge (Trustee?) makes a percentage of commission for trading the penal price offered to the dead soul, that they claim ownership over, if the target agrees to the game where the living soul pretends, or acts like, agrees to, being a dead soul, or slave, and the private bank employees, trading in dead souls, extract any power found to be connected to the living soul, the target, and if there is power worth taking, then a transfer of power is facilitated, in a measurable way, from the target to the so called bankers, or so called trustees, or so called judges, and the so called prosecutors, or the so called executors, 1:10:00 They do not want to stop crime, that is how they make their living, they want to perpetuate crime, because they get a piece of the action, they, the Legal Criminals, trade in crime, the more evil the better. Where is the list, the official list, of the Penal Prices paid to Judges, or Trustees, for each specific crime, and what is the percentage rate, or commission, paid to the Judges, in America, officially? The real, authentic, actual, price per crime, paid according to that Law? 1. UCC? 2. Admiralty? 3. Noehide? 1: Weak spot of the Judge, where the Judge loses (money), is a case where an appeal overturns their profit making venture in trading Penal Prices for Crime made Legal. "Fiduciary duties" not be followed? Challenge a Judge with words such as: "Your Honor I seek leave for an interrogatory appeal on a matter of law." So fiduciary duties is the glue that binds the Legal Criminals into a single POWER that makes them more powerful than the sum of each individual Legal Criminal added up, honor among thieves. Comments: Frank again stresses that you do not want to ever go to court, the Black Robed "traders" are only paying lip service to the concept of Law, but, if you do face these (so called) people, then do not be like them, do not become dishonorable in a true sense, and offer them a way out at the first level of their Court, which according to Frank is UCC or Uniform Commercial Code. In other words everyone loses if the victim, the target, YOU, facing the Court fails to follow rules offered to you, but kept from you, secret rules that THEY think you should know, and since you fail to know these secret rules (hidden in plain sight), since you are incompetent, then they OWN YOU, and they can do with you as they please, and everyone loses, them, you, everyone loses if you play hard ball, you play by their hidden rules, their secret rules, and you challenge them at the first level, at UCC, and you fail to use the right words, the right magic spells, the right paperwork, whatever, if you fail to do it right, then everyone loses, and the Judge (Trustee) runs out of the court, calling the code word "recess" which does not mean "recess," the word "recess" means that the Judge has caught you in error, and the Judge will go get a "bigger stick" (Franks' words) and when the Judge returns after "recess" you are in bigger trouble, and the Judge is in bigger trouble, so the stakes are higher, and now YOU may go to jail, instead of YOU paying a fine in the lower level, or commercial level. Now, this all replaces actual Common Law, so get that out of your heads, and I can comment on that much more, but returning to the IDEA that you want to win at the first level, and you don't want to force the Judge to go into the second level, so you have to do the right things at the first level, where you politely offer the "Judge" (Trustee) an offer to dismiss the case. Frank says words that may be worth quoting, in that first level, that UCC level, where the target (my words), and the victim (my words) has the opportunity to play hard ball, which is to say that the targeted victim can be competent, and the victim can defend effectively against being a victim, and the defender takes control, becomes a self governing defender and the defender offers the "Judge" a way out, which the "Judge" will take, because the "Judge" does not want to risk his own loss of commission, money, pay, earnings, for trading in your soul - which is the bottom line here. The stage is then set, the defender is up against the Black Robed Devil Worshiper in fact, or the ignorant unwilling fellow victim of Crime made Legal, just another soldier in a costume, or uniform, who is just following orders, trying to earn a decent living in a world run by the insane. So YOU the target (supposedly, or theoretically, or in actual fact some time in the future) and this is a Stage set at the first level of PLAYTIME, and this level is called UCC LAW, or CODE, and at this level the most you will have to face is loss of some measure of value, a fine, loss of control of some property, whatever, this is not a level whereby you will face jail time, which is very likely to be physical pain combined with emotional pain, or physical damage combined with psychological damage, and if you have no idea what that is like, then speak to someone who has been in prison, and if they are willing to tell you the truth, then you can learn from their experiences without having to go through it yourself. So at the first Level of Legal Crime, this UCC Level, facing pecuniary punishment, you can act like a slave, and pay up, or you may not be able to afford the payments, your own Judgement, and you fight back, in defense, in Liberty. You challenge the Kangaroo Court, and you use their own laws to make that Challenge. Frank says (and this requires much of my time and effort to replay the audio file over and over again to get these words copied), so Franks offers an example of what can be a competitive challenge, in his words (not the words of an independent self governing, actual, human being speaking at that time and place): First if the bailiff or judge calls recess in UCC "court" because you failed to be competent while in UCC: Time 1:22: or so Respond to "recess" with a challenge, which is an offer, or way out for the "Judge". "Let it be on the record, I do not consent to the Judge changing the form of law of the court to Admiralty, or, I do not consent to the form of the law being changed to Cannon Law and Admiralty." That is if the recess is being called and the Judge is still in UCC court, not yet returning in Admiralty Law. What needs to be done while still in UCC, to avoid forcing the Judge out, is this (according to Frank) to be competent, honorable, polite, honest, respectful, etc.: Defender of self government (your plea): "Your honor I wish to firstly ask, please, as a matter of law, are you presiding as trustee of this matter as a constructive Trust, as a Trust?" "Judge" (Legal Criminal) often may say: "I'm not here to answer that, I've asked for your plea, how do you plea?" Defender "Your honor without seeking an appeal on a matter of law, to another court, I merely ask, are you presiding as the trustee of this matter as a constructive Trust, or in fact as Administrator of a Cestui Que Vies from which the Trust is created?" If the "Judge" (Legal Crime) leaves (bait and switch) despite being offered a way out, a way for the "Judge" to dismiss the case, and avoid further escalation of risks for the "Judge" and for the target, the defender, if the "Judge" runs out of court anyway, then: Defending "I wish, for the record to object, to the judge changing the form of the law, and I will reassert my rights upon his return." Note: "They make it up as they go along." Key words "It is a matter of law." |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
To anyone reading this who may be looking for remedies concerning anything done by any claim of any law anywhere in Earth, your inquisition into such remedies is a common sense perception, or awareness of a threat, and a common sense willful adjustment in your thinking to address that threat, and a common sense willful decision to answer that threat, and a common sense action that will, by your will, remedy that threat. If you are willfully acting in defense against such threats, and if it is a common sense thing to do, then other people are also willfully acting in defense against such threats. What is the common denominator common to all people who are willfully acting in defense against attacks being made by attackers who attack from a position of false authority? I am working with English words right now, showing one competitive example of how an individual acts in defense against accurately measurable threats that originate from people who are attacking from positions of false authority. I am not alone, if you are reading this, chances are that you are not seeking to join those who threaten, chances are you are not one of the few who claim to be right as they threaten from positions of false authority, so chances are you are as I am, as many of us are, which is, we, we the targeted, We The People, who are being attacked by those few who are hiding behind false authority. That leads into Episode 6, where the speaker speaking in a sound file is offering a competitive defensive system by which the targets collectively find remedy, as if to say, hey, you are not alone, and We The People can combine our individual defensive Power and We The People can become more defensively Powerful than the sum of our individual parts. Here is the link to Episode 6: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-90342/TS-429440.mp3 A caller asks a question at Time 1:04 concerning the systematic defense against attacks being made by false authorities, and the caller offers a question concerning who claims to be The Boss of those who attack us. I can comment on that, but who would listen? bear may respond, I don't know. The person questioning the speaker in Episode 6 sounds (not is) like Walter Burien, and that person questioning comments on another group of We The People who are defending our Liberty, and so I looked and found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp-mnivAPTM Private and Public Trust Explained - Creditors in Commerce It may be a good time, right here and now, to link again the efforts by Walter Burien to Blow The Whistle on those who attack us from behind false authority: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkwjtbTjTsE In the Episode 6 audio file the questions concerning those people who claim to be The Boss of those who attack us from behind false authority is not answered. I think it is understandable, reasonable, to ask who is The Boss of the people who attack us from behind false authority. A misleading answer is a way of accurately measuring the actual problem. 1. End The FED 2. End The IRS 3. Bring the Troops Home (be the troops at home) 4. Do so by July 4th 2013, be there, or be square. I spoke too soon, listening further in Episode 6 there is an answer to the question offered, and it is an answer that has become a very common term used to Label The Boss of those who attack us from behind false authority. Time 1:19: or so is mentioned the Story of the Scorpion and The Frog Scorpion and Frog Fable Time 2:12: or so there is mention of the financing of sin, whereby claims of ownership, are false, and therefore the idea, I suppose, from a Legal Criminal viewpoint, is to invest into, and then profit from, all the conflicts that arise from manipulating that lie into general usage. From an old Jewish axiom (Philo?): "Good man is free, evil man is a slave to possessions. " From Creditors in Commerce I found David Wynn Miller on the subject of Language here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcW6Hzn46w That appears to be, so far in the first minutes, worth listening to, and that began with a request to find the missing parts of that presentation. Language is crucial for cooperation to work. False language is necessary for crime to work. "Everyone understands a performance contract." Find out how to speak accurately? http://dwmlc.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcW6Hzn46w Time: 3:40:56 Signing documents? Competitive strategies fighting Legal Crime? A. Ecclesiastic Deed Polls (No Dishonor or do not sign Documents produced by the Judges/Prosecutors/Clerks) B. Quantum Grammar (Sign on top of Stamps) Time: 4:26. on The words spoken at that time begin, in my opinion to confess the speaker to be someone parroting the falsehoods of over-population with the falsehoods therefore creating a supposed need to kill off very large numbers of people. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I joined an Episode and asked a question to which Frank O'Collins offered an answer, and the answer was an example of what not to do, so that is not good in my opinion. What is good, on the other hand, is useful information. What might be exemplary as to useful information? 1. The opinion one person has of the character flaws of another human being. 2. Accurate information that accurately identifies clear and present dangers, and accurate information that accurately identifies, and communicates, effective methods of avoiding harm to anyone. So I look for the later, and the former is not what I look for, and not what I ask for, when I am thinking clearly, and when I am not making routine mistakes. 10 Facts I think these are worth repeating. Fact #1 – The truth sometimes takes time to be revealed. The truth often hurts. Fact #2 – The people who work as judges, magistrates, prosecutors and attorneys are not evil people Fact #3 – The system is broken Fact #4 – The people who run the system know it is broken Fact #5 – The courts are for-profit businesses no different in theory to your local bank or real estate agent Fact #6 – The corporate for-profit courts actually have very little power over you Fact #7 – The main weapons for the courts to control you are fear and intimidation Fact #8– The secondary weapons of the courts are promoting incompetence and dishonor Fact #9– The courts know they are committing fraud and will do anything to maintain the veil of public ignorance Fact #10– Once a court as a for-profit business creates a case number and legal person, it rarely backs down 10 things to do? Point #1 – Re-read and re-listen to the 10 Facts we have just discussed Point #2 –Rediscover respect and awe for life and the world Point #3 –Embrace a life of honesty and personal responsibility Point #4 –Guard your word/promise; Defend your honor Point #5 – Commit enthusiastically to a life journey of learning and development Point #6 –Forgive and release those grievances that have chained you Point #7 –Accept cheerfully you cannot control the desperation of tyrants Point #8 –Gather your affairs in order Point #9 –Simplify your life and fear nothing as you are already immortal Point #10 –Pray for others and the world ? I managed to figure out how to comment. Finding the following word: Exchequer capitalized : a department or office of state in medieval England charged with the collection and management of the royal revenue and judicial determination of all revenue causes 2 capitalized : a former superior court having jurisdiction in England and Wales primarily over revenue matters and now merged with King's Bench 3 often capitalized a : the department or office of state in Great Britain and Northern Ireland charged with the receipt and care of the national revenue b : the national banking account of this realm |
|||||||||||
