| ||||
Power Independence > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Free Market Government Voluntary Forces |
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley |
|
||||||||||||||
| Free Market Government Voluntary Forces | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17th, 2014 06:45 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Rewritten from here: http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/3428871 Free Market Government Voluntary Forces People not states agree or disagree to perpetrate crimes upon each other or to defend against criminals. If that is not understood then people, not states, may be fooled into the foolish trap of misdirection. Misdirection works for the criminals as the criminals take over courts, take over governments, take over defense against criminals, as the victims are led to believe that courts, governments, and defense against criminals can be done by things, not people. This is the classic misdirection at work and it can be seen in very simple examples. "So here is my question to you minarchists. You want a constitution; you have one." When the people defended themselves in America during the time period between 1776 and 1787 the people created 13 Constitutions for 13 defense associations and all 13 defense associations worked within a free market voluntary government association known as The Articles of Confederation. The people also defended themselves with an improved version of trial by jury that was improved from the higher cost and lower quality version that was in England under a counterfeited version of common law. See here: There is Nothing Lawful about Common Law by Frank O'Collins http://blog.ucadia.com/2014/06/there-is-nothing-lawful-about-common-law.html And here: Equity Lecture Notes/Historical Introduction from Law Teacher http://www.lawteacher.net/english-legal-system/lecture-notes/equity.php In direct opposition to the above studies of a type of Common Law (as enforced by people involuntarily upon people) is the follow study of a very different version of common law that is common among people seeking a common defense against criminals here: Trial by Jury by Lysdander Spooner http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html So the misdirection here, in that sentence quoted, has to do with the difference between a working free market government or defense association market, or Federation, and the counterfeit version run by criminals. Here is the quote again: "So here is my question to you minarchists. You want a constitution; you have one." From here: What makes law "legitimate?" - A question from an anarchist - posed to the minarchist by a member of The Daily Paul Forum http://www.dailypaul.com/320648/what-makes-law-legitimate-a-question-from-an-anarchist-posed-to-the-minarchist The criminals took over the free market defense association Federation in 1787 turning 13 competitive defense associations into ONE MONOPOLY CRIME SYNDICATE/CARTEL/MONOPOLY. "So here is my question to you minarchists. You want a constitution; you have one." That is a misdirection. The same so called Anarchist named Lysander Spooner who wrote Trial by Jury also wrote No Treason. http://jim.com/treason.htm The bait and switch is the same misdirection each time, and the fools fall for it each time. Where there were 13 competitive defense associations, some run by criminals, as bait, there was a switch made as those 13 choices became obedience without question enforced by fraud and extortion hidden behind a thin, and thinning, veil of legitimacy known as the color of law. There is a fool born every minute, so says one man, and another man says that you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all the people all the time, so some of us are not fooled by this: "So here is my question to you minarchists. You want a constitution; you have one." The bait is VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION and the switch is INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION. The bait is democratic government in the form of 13 constitutional republics to choose from within a voluntary Federation with a working trial by jury process that is a process due everyone without exception; meaning the idea is affordable law for all and no one, not even the criminals are excluded or priced out of due process. When anyone ever says OBEY WITHOUT QUESTION they confess their guilty criminal minds as they off that MONOPOLY VIEWPOINT, that CRIMINAL VIEWPOINT. The reason why such a lie gains traction, why he lie is able to fool the fools, is that the lie is offered under the color of law, or under the false claim that the only way to get to VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION (Liberty) is through INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION (crime). The lie fools the fools into the belief in the lie because the fools are led to believe that the only way to get to freedom FROM the criminals is to pay the criminals everything the criminals demand, and do so without question. How foolish are the fools? You may need to take a more careful look in the mirror. The supposed Common Law Courts of England (not America) were of this same duality, or the same genuine versus counterfeit versions offered by honest people offering genuine versions and deceitful people offering counterfeit versions of LAW, and so the free market force applied in England caused the genuine free market people to leave England and settle in America; free people choose freedom instead of slavery: a free market choice. Fresh in the minds of the American settlers were the concepts of our courts, our government, our religion, our common sense, our common defense, and our common needs for survival, as a reality in contrast with the opposing reality where the criminals run things with the criminal counterfeit versions: monopoly, tyranny, despotism, MONARCHY, as the false versions of our common defense. 1. Genuine free market, of the people, by the people, and for the people who reject the counterfeit, monopoly, monarchy, cartel, cabal, criminal organization. 2. False version, counterfeit version, of the criminals, by the criminals, and for the criminals, monarchy, monopoly, cartel, cabal, criminal organization POSING as government, counterfeit defense, false non-aggression, false free market, false peace, false liberty, false freedom, false good. Fresh in the minds of those people were the stark differences between right and wrong as defined by at least 16 documents as such: I. Common Sense by Thomas Paine http://www.ushistory.org/PAINE/commonsense/index.htm Quote:___________________________ Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. __________________________________ Yup, Tom, common sense stuff, but it may be a good idea to acknowledge a free market government voluntary union type of arrangement as being other than evil; just don't forget about trial by jury. please. That led to the next document: II. The Declaration of Independence III. That led to the next 13 Documents: 1. Unwritten Constitution of Connecticut: http://www.ctstatelibrary.org/pages/connecticut-constitution... "An unwritten constitution that the whole society believes in is likely to be much stronger than a written one that a society does not believe in. England has lasted a millennium with an unwritten constitution, whereas a majority of the countries today with a written one have seen it ignored by military strongmen and others." 2. Constitution of Delaware; 1776: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/de02.asp The Constitution, or System of Government, agreed to and resolved upon by the Representatives in full Convention of the Delaware State, formerly styled "The Government of the Counties of New Castle, Kent, and Sussex, upon Delaware," the said Representatives being chosen by the Freemen of the said State for that express Purpose. a "...by the freemen..." b "...a free and independent State..." c "... lay embargoes or prohibit the exportation of any commodity for any time not exceeding thirty days in the recess of the general assembly; he shall have the power of granting pardons or reprieves, except where the prosecution shall be carried on by the house of assembly, or the law shall otherwise direct, in which cases no pardon or reprieve shall be granted, but by a resolve of the house of assembly, and may exercise all the other executive powers of government' limited and restrained as by this constitution is mentioned, and according to the laws of the State..." d " which court shall be styled the " court of appeals," and have all the authority and powers heretofore given by law in the last resort e "...sheriffs and coroners..." f "...officers in the army or navy of this State..." "...to the King in council, under the old government..." g "And all officers shall be removed on conviction of misbehavior at common law, or on impeachment, or upon the address of the general assembly." h ART. 25. The common law of England, as-well as so much of the statute law as has been heretofore adopted in practice in this State, shall remain in force, unless they shall be altered by a future law of the legislature; such parts only excepted as are repugnant to the rights and privileges contained in this constitution, and the declaration of rights, &c., agreed to by this convention. i ART. 26. No person hereafter imported into this State from Africa ought to be held in slavery under any presence whatever; and no negro, Indian, or mulatto slave ought to be brought into this State, for sale, from any part of the world. Those words (lower case common law for example) establish the concept of "we the people govern ourselves by consent" (voluntary association) as opposed to "government by a thing, a monopoly, a cartel, organized crime, monarchy, despotism, tyranny, etc. (involuntary association or "AP" or Aggression Principle) so moving now to document 3 of 13 Constitutional Free Market Defense Associations or State/Republic/Democracy/Government by the people, of the people, and for the people, not government by the criminals, of the criminals, for the criminals AT THE EXPENSE of the victims. 3. Constitution of Georgia; February 5, 1777: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ga02.asp _______________________ ART. XXXIX. All matters of breach of the peace, felony, murder, and treason against the State to be tried in the county where the same was committed. All matters of dispute, both civil and criminal, in any county where there is not a sufficient number of inhabitants to form a court, shall be tried in the next adjacent county where a court is held. ART. XL. All causes, of what nature soever, shall be tried in the supreme court, except as hereafter mentioned; which court shall con sist of the chief-justice, and three or more of the justices residing in the county. In case of the absence of the chief-justice, the senior justice on the bench shall act as chief-justice, with the clerk of the county, attorney for the State, sheriff, coroner, constable, and the jurors; and in case of the absence of any of the aforementioned officers, the justices to appoint others in their room pro tempore. And if any plaintiff or defendant in civil causes shall be dissatisfied with the determination of the jury, then, and in that case, they shall be at liberty, within three days, to enter an appeal from that verdict, and demand a new trial by a special jury, to be nominated as follows, viz: each party, plaintiff and defendant, shall choose six, six more names shall be taken indifferently out of a box provided for that purpose, the whole eighteen to be summoned, and their names to be put together into the box, and the first twelve that are drawn out, being present, shall be the special jury to try the cause, and from which there shall be no appeal. ART. XLI. The jury shall be judges of law, as well as of fact, and shall not be allowed to bring in a special verdict; but if all or any of the jury have any doubts concerning points of law, they shall apply to the bench, who shall each of them in rotation give their opinion. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ART. XLV. No grand jury shall consist of less than eighteen, and twelve may find a bill. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ART. LVIII. No person shall be allowed to plead in the courts of law in this State, except those who are authorized so to do by the house of assembly; and if any person so authorized shall be found guilty of malpractice before the house of assembly, they shall have power to suspend them. This is not intended to exclude any person from that inherent privilege of every freeman, the liberty to plead his own cause. ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ART. LXI. Freedom of the press and trial by jury to remain inviolate forever. ______________________________________________ Above are some reports in the area of trial by jury in this Constitutionally Limited Republic or State, where there is an obvious effort to "...to exclude any person from that inherent privilege of every freeman..." words claiming otherwise notwithstanding the actual evidence? Note: 13 Republics varying wildly as to levels of despotic (crimna0 control. 4. Constitution of Maryland - November 11, 1776 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/ma02.asp "THE parliament of Great Britain, by a declaratory act, having assumed a right to make laws to bind the Colonies in all cases whatsoever, and, in pursuance of Rich claim, endeavoured, by force of arms, to subjugate the United Colonies to an unconditional submission to their will and power, and having at length constrained them to declare themselves independent States, and to assume government under the authority of the people; Therefore we, the Delegates of Maryland, in free and full Convention assembled, taking into our most serious consideration the best means of establishing a good Constitution in this State, for the sure foundation and more permanent security thereof, declare," _____________________________________________ III. That the inhabitants of Maryland are entitled to the common law of England, and the trial by Jury, according that law, and to the benefit of such of the English statutes, as existed at the time of their first emigration, and which, by experience, have been found applicable to their local and other circumstances, and of such others as have been since made in England, or Great Britain, and have been introduced, used and practiced by the courts of law or equity; and also to acts of Assembly, in force on the first of June seventeen hundred and seventy-four, except such as may have since expired, or have been or may be altered by facts of Convention, or this Declaration of Rights-subject, nevertheless, to the revision of, and amendment or repeal by, the Legislature of this State: and the inhabitants of Maryland are also entitled to all property, derived to them, from or under the Charter, granted by his Majesty Charles I. to Crecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore. ______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ XVII. That every freeman, for any injury done him in his person or property, ought to have remedy, by the course of the law of the land, and ought to have justice and right freely without sale, fully without any denial, and speedily without delay, according to the law of the land. _______________________________________________ Those people in Maryland were obviously serious about their rights of individual defense against criminals hiding behind color of law. And from those people a reference to common law courts (lower case): _________________________________________________ LII. That every Chancellor, Judge, Register of Wills, Commissioner of the Loan Office, Attorney-General, Sheriff, Treasurer, Naval Officer, Register of the Land Office, Register of the Chancery Court, and every Clerk of the common law courts, Surveyor and Auditor of the public accounts, before he acts as such, shall take an oath " That he will not directly or indirectly receive any fee or reward, for doing his office of , but what is or shall be allowed by law; nor will, directly or indirectly, receive the profits or any part of the profits of any office held by any other person, and that he does not hold the same office in trust, or for the benefit of any other person." ________________________________________________ 5. Constitution of Massachusetts 1780 http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/ma-1780.htm Before quoting from sources in Massachusetts it may help general knowledge with a clear understanding of the Party of people known as Federalists (Morris, Washington, Hamilton, and John Adams) whereby these people had very close ties with Organized Crime Syndication, Cartelization, Monopoly POWER. Washington was the Strong Man: http://mises.org/daily/2885 Generalissimo Washington: How He Crushed the Spirit of Liberty Hamilton was the Central Banker Monopolist: http://mises.org/daily/3167/The-Corrupt-Origins-of-Central-B... John Adams was President during the days when the PARTY (Federalists) were working to destroy the main enemy of the British Criminal Organization (or The British, or the Monarchy, or the Bank of England) and that main enemy of the Party was The French. Remembering accurate history includes the memory of how The French aided American Revolutionary Forces (insurgents, rebels, rabble, levelers, commoners, etc.) to defeat the criminal British invaders. So...why was John Adams so well tied with British Interests to the point at which John Adams presides over The Alien and Sedition Acts? http://www.fjc.gov/history/docs/seditionacts.pdf Back to Massachusetts Charter and then Constitution of 1780; 4 years after 1776 and The Declaration of Independence Massachusetts constitutes: Charter: Explanatory Charter of Massachusetts Bay - 1725 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/mass08.asp "...Kingdom at Westminster..." (see link by Frank O'Collins on Westminster) Constitution of Massachusetts 1780: http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/ma-1780.htm "The end of the institution, maintenance, and administration of government, is to secure the existence of the body politic, to protect it, and to furnish the individuals who compose it..." That is where I smell a rat. There is in that construction the making of a thing that is an entity onto itself, a "body politic" that is then "the government" and "it" does this, and "it" does that, such as "it" furnishes "individuals who compose it," and if you do not see how "it" then becomes a legal fiction, then you may need some effort on your part invested in knowing better from worse. I can go into this in much greater detail concerning the probabilities of why the last battle of the Revolution (so called Shays's Rebellion) was lost in Massachusetts and why that battle triggered the formation of the Federalist PARTY (should have been named Communist Party) where Morris, Hamilton, and the other central bankers enticed their Strong Man Washington to dishonor HIS word to retire, enlisting their Strong Man Washington to command their Standing National Army of Tax Collectors (war debt collectors collecting debt for their money fraud POWER in England, and onward to whoever, Jesuits, The Vatican, whatever) See also: George Washington Jailer And Tax Collector http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/ConstitutionalRelatedReports/Constitution%20-%20George%20Washington%20Jailer%20And%20Tax%20Collector..htm "Washington broke the government, so he could become the chief tax collector for the Congress of the United States and, also, so he could jail anyone who refused to consent to be taxed." Can you say Cartelize? Can you say Monopolize? Here in this post 1776 and pre-1787 (post Declaration of Independence and pre-Dirty Compromise) time period is where the proof of how free market government proves why free market government works as it is designed to work, since Massachusetts would have been one of the first (worst) Republics to then be forced (by market forces) to end the infestation of despotism, and to supply to the people what the people demand; which is Liberty. Although the Revolutionary forces (free market forces) were crushed in Massachusetts by the existing organized crime cabal running the Massachusetts "government," those who survived the battle fled to other Constitutional Republics such as Vermont. That "voting with their feet" from one despotic State (Massachusetts) to find sanctuary in a less, or non-despotic State, is called MARKET FORCES, as the voters are then voting with their feet, like runaway slaves, from one organized crime system to a free system, and what can the criminals do to force the slaves to return to slavery? The bears repeating: What can the criminals do to force the slaves to return to slavery? They hold secret meetings and they hatch a criminal plan is the standard criminal procedure: http://archive.org/stream/secretproceedin00convgoog#page/n14... "One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished." Moving to another Constitutional Republic (from the original 13): 6. Constitution of New Hampshire - 1776 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nh09.asp _________________________________ The sudden and abrupt departure of his Excellency John Wentworth, Esq., our late Governor, and several of the Council, leaving us destitute of legislation, and no executive courts being open to punish criminal offenders; whereby the lives and properties of the honest people of this colony are liable to the machinations and evil designs of wicked men, Therefore, for the preservation of peace and good order, and for the security of the lives and properties of the inhabitants of this colony, we conceive ourselves reduced to the necessity of establishing A FORM OF GOVERNMENT to continue during the present unhappy and unnatural contest with Great Britain; PROTESTING and DECLARING that we neaver sought to throw off our dependence upon Great Britain, but felt ourselves happy under her protection, while we could enjoy our constitutional rights and privileges. And that we shall rejoice if such a reconciliation between us and our parent State can be effected as shall be approved by the CONTINENTAL CONGRESS, in whose prudence and wisdom we confide. Accordingly pursuant to the trust reposed in us, WE DO Resolve, that this Congress assume the name, power and authority of a house of Representatives or Assembly for the Colony of New-Hampshire And that said House then proceed to choose twelve persons, being. reputable freeholders and inhabitants within this colony, in the following manner, viz. five in the county of Rockingham, two in the county of Stratford, two in the county of Hillsborough, two in the county of Cheshire, and one in the county of Grafton, to be a distinct and separate branch of the Legislature by the name of a COUNCIL for this colony, to continue as such until the third Wednesday in December next; any seven of whom to be a quorum to do business. That such Council appoint their President, and in his absence that the senior counsellor preside; that a Secretary be appointed by both branches, who may be a counssellor, or otherwise, as they shall choose: _______________________________________ Military expedience comes to my mind; what is the mother of invention? 7. Constitution of New Jersey; 1776 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nj15.asp _____________________________________ WHEREAS all the constitutional authority ever possessed by the kings of Great Britain over these colonies,(2) or their other dominions, was, by compact, derived from the people, and held of them, for the common interest of the whole society; allegiance and protection are, in the nature of things, reciprocal ties; each equally depending upon the other, and liable to be dissolved by the others being refused or withdrawn. And whereas George the Third, king of Great Britain, has refused protection to the good people of these colonies; and, by assenting to sundry acts of the British parliament, attempted to subject them to the absolute dominion of that body; and has also made war upon them, in the most cruel and unnatural manner, for no other cause, than asserting their just rights-all civil authority under him is necessarily at an end, and a dissolution of government in each colony has consequently taken place. And whereas, In the present deplorable situation of these colonies, exposed to the fury of a cruel and relentless enemy, some form of government is absolutely necessary, not only for the preservation of good order, but also the more effectually to unite the people, and enable them to exert their whole force in their own necessary defence: and as the honorable the continental congress, the supreme council of the American colonies, has advised such of the colonies as have not yet gone into measures, to adopt for themselves, respectively, such government as shall best conduce to their own happiness and safety, and the well-being of America in general:-We, the representatives of the colony of New Jersey, having been elected by all the counties, in the freest manner, and in congress assembled, have, after mature deliberations, agreed upon a set of charter rights and the form of a Constitution, in manner following, viz. _________________________________________ Natural requirements for individual defense whereas the whole people as a sum total of people needing defense engage in their common defense. Here in New Jersey is found a very stark contrast to that which was found in Massachusetts first New Jersey: _______________________________ XVIII. That no person shall ever, within this Colony, be deprived of the inestimable privilege of worshipping Almighty God in a manner, agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; nor, under any presence whatever, be compelled to attend any place of worship, contrary to his own faith and judgment; nor shall any person, within this Colony, ever be obliged to pay tithes, taxes, or any other rates, for the purpose of building or repairing any other church or churches, place or places of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes to be right, or has deliberately or voluntarily engaged himself to perform. XIX. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious sect in this Province, in preference to another; and that no Protestant inhabitant of this Colony shall be denied the enjoyment of any civil right, merely on account of his religious principles; but that all persons, professing a belief in the faith of any Protestant sect. who shall demean themselves peaceably under the government, as hereby established, shall be capable of being elected into any office of profit or trust, or being a member of either branch of the Legislature, and shall fully and freely enjoy every privilege and immunity, enjoyed by others their fellow subjects. _____________________________________________ That can be compared to the Massachusetts "law": ______________________________________________ Therefore, To promote their happiness and to secure the good order and preservation of their government, the people of this commonwealth have a right to invest their legislature with power to authorize and require, and the legislature shall, from time to time, authorize and require, the several towns, parishes, precincts, and other bodies-politic or religious societies to make suitable provision, at their own expense, for the institution of the public worship of God and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality in all cases where such provision shall not be made voluntarily. ________________________________________________ Some may not smell the rat. I smell the rat. Back to New Jersey: _________________________________________________ XXII. That the common law of England, as well as so much of the statute law, as have been heretofore practiced in this Colony, shall still remain in force, until they shall be altered by a future law of the Legislature; such parts only excepted, as are repugnant to the rights and privileges contained in this Charter; and that the inestimable right of trial by jury shall remain confirmed as a part of the law of this Colony, without repeal, forever. __________________________________________________ 8. The Constitution of New York : April 20, 1777 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ny01.asp _____________________________________________ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to edect their safety and happiness. ________________________________________________ Cut and pasted in 1777 from 1776? _________________________________________________ XXXVII. And whereas it is of great importance to the safety of this State that peace and amity with the Indians within the same be at all times supported and maintained; and whereas the frauds too often practiced towards the said Indians, in contracts made for their lands, have, in divers instances, been productive of dangerous discontents and animosities: Be it ordained, that no purchases or contracts for the sale of lands, made since the fourteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and seventy-five, or which may hereafter be made with or of the said Indians, within the limits of this State, shall be binding on the said Indians, or deemed valid, unless made under the authority and with the consent of the legislature of this State. XXXVIII. And whereas we are required, by the benevolent principles of rational liberty, not only to expel civil tyranny, but also to guard against that spiritual oppression and intolerance wherewith the bigotry and ambition of weak and wicked priests and princes have scourged mankind, this convention doth further, in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State, ordain, determine, and declare, that the free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever hereafter be allowed, within this State, to all mankind: Provided, That the liberty of conscience, hereby granted, shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this State. ____________________________________________ I skipped past reverences to common law to find those words of extreme importance concerning the so called savages who had obvious trouble dealing with criminals posing as authorities. Then: _________________________________________ XLI. And this convention doth further ordain, determine, and declare, in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State, that trial by jury, in all cases in which it hath heretofore been used in the colony of New York, shall be established and remain inviolate forever. And that no acts of attainder shall be passed by the legislature of this State for crimes, other than those committed before the termination of the present war; and that such acts shall not work a corruption of blood.(13) And further, that the legislature of this State shall, at no time hereafter, institute any new court or courts, but such as shall proceed according to the course of the common law. ______________________________________________ That was the words of the people in New York written in their competitive constitution. 9. Constitution of North Carolina : December 18, 1776 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nc07.asp _________________________________________________ I. That all political power is vested in and derived from the people only. II. That the people of this State ought to have the sole and exclusive right of regulating the internal government and police thereof. III. That no man or set of men are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services. IV. That the legislative, executive, and supreme judicial powers of government, ought to be forever separate and distinct from each other. V. That all powers of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority, without consent of the Representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights, and ought not to be exercised. ____________________________________________________ Obviously those people in North Carolina are serious about their rights. What may now go on in the minds of readers is the nagging question of black slavery having infected the minds of so many people particularly in the Southern parts of these 13 Republics. Here, again, is a point at which the information proves that the slavery problem was already fixed with the Voluntary Association Solution to the slavery problem. Already noted above is this from the people in Delaware: "ART. 26. No person hereafter imported into this State from Africa ought to be held in slavery under any presence whatever; and no negro, Indian, or mulatto slave ought to be brought into this State, for sale, from any part of the world." One might claim that people in Delaware enforced a rule that no blacks were allowed in Delaware; and that would be a claim, and that would not be written in a document in 1776 as the quoted words above are referring to as the people in Delaware construct their competitive constitution within a Federation. No person...ought to be held in slavery under any presence whatever. That is a true statement. If English means anything, if words mean anything, then no one ought to be a slave anywhere anytime. There is more in here: So called "Anti" Federalist Papers http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/anti-federalist-papers Quote____________________________ Antifederalist No. 15 RHODE ISLAND IS RIGHT! This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-America Intelligencer?) The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free. _______________________________________________ The end of slavery was in the works with a voluntary union or Federal design of competitive republics all in competition to provide the highest quality defense against criminals at the lowest possible cost and there, in those words, proves the case. Slavery was against the law BEFORE the criminals took over in 1787. "Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous." Without which the patriotism of some (people in) some states appears ridiculous. George Mason and Patrick Henry were against the Constitution of 1787. Some people knew the end of slavery was at their fingertips; only to be stolen by the frauds in 1787 and then the debt collectors after they took over a once free people. Yup, too bad. It is merely evil. It is falsehood that even now works on the fools who are fooled by the bait and switch routine.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Current time is 09:56 am | |
| Power Independence > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Liberty Day Challenge 2013 > Free Market Government Voluntary Forces | Top |