| ||||
| ||||
| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | Page:   1 2 3 |
|
|||||||||||||
| Joe's Law | Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sat Dec 19th, 2009 09:26 am |
|
41st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Below is a series of links linking news items that tell a story by their connection. First is a hidden news item where the people who are best able to profit from the secrecy are the people who are currently running an organized crime ring called "The Dollar Hegemony" - these people profit from their power to print dollars at will, and spend dollars at will, for as long as the fraud remains covered in secrecy. First up is an exposure of the fraud in progress as some of the victims of the fraud are taking steps toward removing the power behind the fraud. My words may not ring true, and the reader could spend some effort at accurately identifying why my words don't ring true, rather than suffering from some conditioned response. I can't make someone understand no more than I can make a person drink poison when a person is conditioned to think that the truth is poison. Here is the first link: http://www.worldreports.org/news/251_47_trillion_lien_against_U.S._treasury_and_fed The reader who scoffs at that link may find reasonable cause to judge the simple truth of it, with slight effort, rather than merely jerking the knee. At some point the holders of debt notes know that the borrower can't pay, the amount owed becomes excessive. Promises of paying back what is borrowed become as empty as the moral conscience of these torturing mass murderers who run these organized crime rings (The Fed). If the reader is willing to entertain the possibility that the crime ring (The Fed or The Dollar Hegemony) is being busted, being "justified", having their credit cards cut, etc., then the next link could be connected to the first link, with some effort. http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi138.html That is a conservative link, a source from which capitalists are known to gather, a republican type of world view, a free market perspective, and an economical viewpoint. Note the quote: Unable to create a level competitive field for banking, the bank reform effort has now shifted away from cooperation to a master plan to take down the world’s economies and exercise complete control in the aftermath by introduction of a master plan to control banking and currency. Complexity works in favor of the organized criminals since their victims are confused, shocked and awed, and rendered power-less - unable to defend themselves. That brings this effort to link 3, where people figure out how to defend themselves and do so without sustained warfare, without legalized violence on a torturous and mass murderous scale: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24219.htm Note how the defenders are blamed for defending themselves, by whom? Who, and who exactly, blames innocent victims for defending themselves? Which brings this effort to the 4th link: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/754.html When faced with an overwhelming power of destruction there must be a greater power of defense or the inevitable result will be. Here is a path to ponder: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24217.htm However, if they still refuse to lend money, additional measures could be taken. The government could take over the banks and run them as public utilities. The only losers here would be the billionaire shareholders.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jan 8th, 2010 10:44 am |
|
42nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/tech-wish-list.html
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Feb 3rd, 2010 10:49 am |
|
43rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/800.html The bottom line there can be measure with a very simple power formula. Power invested is divided into power produced. If the result is more, rather than less, power: then what is the bottom line? Answer: More Power
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 01:01 pm |
|
44th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/venezuelas-hugo-chavez-declares-energy-crisis/article1461041/
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Feb 17th, 2010 11:25 am |
|
45th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2010/02/15/saudi-energy-adviser-alarmed-about-peak-oil-pushes-for-diversified-economy/ Peak Oil Demand
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 22nd, 2010 08:09 am |
|
46th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://gas2.org/2010/05/20/back-to-the-future-a-revolutionary-1000-ev-with-battery-swap-tech-and-a-100-mile-range/ Killers?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 27th, 2010 12:32 pm |
|
47th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25550.htmOf course, most Americans don't earn $1 million a year. In fact 9.9 percent earn nothing because they are unemployed. It's a shame that we have wasted that $1 trillion on war, rather than on a WPA-style program to repair our roads and bridges that could have hired those 15.3 million people out of work for $50,000 apiece. And on top of that, we would still have had a cool $235 billion left over to invest in clean energy, producing 3.9 million green jobs while reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, according to a study by the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Joe's Law applied: Power (1 trillion dollars is Purchasing Power) produced into a state of oversupply (Borrowed/Printed/Stolen - whatever) reduces the price of power (In this case the interest rate goes down, which is the price of money, because too much money has been Borrowed/Printed/Stolen) while purchasing power increases (in this case where purchasing power is spent the factor of what the purchasing power buys is significant) because power reduces the cost of production (in this case the cost of printing is in view, and so convoluted, ambiguous, and able to render stupification, that a book is needed to explain the cost reduction phenomenon - think in terms of "how stupid are we now" and "why"). Now replace the factor of money with the two examples of power purchases: A. Road Maintenance B. Investing in power production (renewable) Power (road maintenance) produced into a state of oversupply (spending almost 1 trillion on this could be an example of oversupply, even as bad the roads may appear at this time) reduces the price of power (too much road maintenance reduces the price of road maintenance, as too much of anything will reduce the price of it) while purchasing power increases (again, in this case, the factor of investment or “that which the power to purchase is employed toward” must be known in order to find the actual change of purchasing power resulting from this production of power where purchasing power is employed toward road maintenance, think: “is the power to transport a net increase in power or is the power to transport not a net increase in power”) because power reduces the cost of production (again: “are the roads truly, and accurately reducing the cost of transportation?”). If in case A (Road Maintenance) the net production of transportation power (less costly transportation gained by the expense of money), then purchasing power increases. If in case A the net cost of money (purchasing power) did not increase the power to transport, then the net change in “that which a dollar will buy” is higher, not lower – because the net change in power (to transport) was negative. How much easier is it to know, and know accurately, how case B (renewable “energy” = power) manages to increase real power, decrease the actual cost of power, increase the net ability to purchase with one unit of money (purchasing power), and lower the cost of producing power? Joe’s Law applied to 1 trillion dollars of purchasing power spent entirely on renewable energy: Power produced into a state of oversupply (Wind turbines, Solar Panels, Modular Green House Food and Algae Fuel units, Electric Cars, etc.) decreases the price of power (as more and more of renewable products flood the market, 1 trillion dollars worth in this case, the price per product will decrease, as does every other thing that is produced into a state of abundance) while purchasing power increases (these things actually, really, truly, and accurately reduce the cost of production so therefore these things actually do, really do, truly do, and accurately do cause an increase in “that which the dollar unit will buy”, or, in one word: deflation) because power reduces the cost of production (Solar panels already reduce the cost of producing electricity, electric cars cost 2 cents per mile of cost, already, compared to 10 cents per mile for gasoline powered cars).
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Oct 6th, 2010 09:19 am |
|
48th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
If the general investing public ever perceives that the Federal Reserve is about to launch a new program of mass inflation, one which is comparable to what it did in October of 2008, then investors will begin looking for historic inflation hedges. Commodities have historically increased in price during times of mass inflation. This especially includes gold and silver. It has also included oil. http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north890.html
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Oct 15th, 2010 01:19 pm |
|
49th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26604.htm
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jan 5th, 2011 01:30 pm |
|
50th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Obsolete coal While watching this report I thought of 2 relevant comments. Comment 1 CO2 is what Algae consumes, and during the process of producing Algae based motor fuel there is a ratio of CO2 consumed in the process compared to the fuel produced in the process. X amount of CO2 is consumed for Y amount of fuel produced when Algae is used for making motor fuel. Do the readers know that motor fuel is made by sugar, corn, and other plants on this planet now? I know this is a fact. Do the readers know that Algae can replace sugar, corn, and other plants as the stock used in the process of making motor fuel? Do the readers know that Algae made motor fuel can cost much less per gallon to make compared to the already used sugar, corm, and other plant made motor fuels? CO2 is consumed during Algae motor fuel production. CO2 is the waste product of Coal motor fuel production. Do readers know this stuff? Comment 1a Do readers know that moonshiners once made their own motor fuel? Comment 2 Do readers know that coal was once used in the mass production of Military Aircraft fuel? Yes, that is a fact, a well known, well documented fact, that coal was used to make high power fighter aircraft fuel. The process by which coal is used to make motor fuel is already known by mankind, it has already existed, it has already been used in human history. Do the readers know this fact? The report linked at the top of the page appears to suggest that reasonable people who want to stop pollution are up against greedy people who want to profit from things that pollute - and pass on the costs of pollution to everyone, including the greedy people. The report doesn't connect many of the dots associated with this subject matter, coal, CO2, motor fuel, profits, costs, etc. Joe's Law helps. When power is produced into a state of oversupply the price of power reduces while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. If coal production is against the law, who is behind such a thing? Really?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jan 6th, 2011 09:16 am |
|
51st Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
More for less The greater the power of falsehood, it seems to me, the less will be the required power of violence; when the goal is domination, enslavement, control, subjugation, and exploitation. In that report the reader can now know, if they have not known up to this point, that Oil has been the goal in the middle east, not spreading democracy, not fighting communism, and not preventing puppet dictators from turning against their masters with the dreaded weapons of mass destruction provided to them by their former employers. Part II In that second part of that report there is a reference made by which the message appears to be such that no enemies exist, and I'll quote the words and let the reader judge the meaning independently. ...and now the Soviet Union is gone and we have the lack of this existential threat that he was worried about and the Cold War. Look HERE From there: The clash in South Ossetia was a valuable lesson for Putin who had hoped that US/Russia relations would gradually thaw. Now he knows that's not possible. When another nation kills your people, everything changes. Each side becomes more inflexible and the prospects for peace dim. At the same time, US strategic objectives in Central Asia haven't changed at all, so Putin must prepare for the next confrontation. That's why he's strengthening alliances that challenge US dominance in the region and in the world. That's why he's looking for opportunities to weaken US power and erode US prestige. That's why he wants to dump the dollar. It's all preparation. How does it work for you to wish away something harmful, perhaps a cold, how about a dent in your new car, an unwanted pregnancy, a unfaithful spouse? You wish, you wish, you wish, and let me know how that remedy works for you? Conflicts are required by dictators; that is the source of their power. See if the following makes sense to you, please don't wish this away: Putin and George Bush were supposedly good friends, but US-Russian relations have steadily deteriorated since February 10, 2007 when Putin gave a speech at a conference in Munich. Now look here, and these are two links that go together like a hammer and an anvil, one must have the other, or the work doesn't - work. 1 1 1 + 1 = something that doesn't go away as a result of wishes. Wish in one hand, defecate in the other, which hand fills up first? A survivor of the Battan Death March, my friend, knew the importance of that question. If peace exists for an extended period of time on this planet there will no longer be a demand for dictators; and they know it. Power flowing abundantly, everyone has it, makes the price insignificant. What power do these people have over their victims? One more quote from the report and one more comment from me. home grown energy Please use your own brain when reading my next comment. There is no physical limit to stop every person on the planet from becoming fully capable of producing all their own power at home. What would happen, and what will happen, once that is the norm? Each person eliminates the home heating bill, the home cooling bill, the home water pumping/filtering bill, and the home food bill, and added to that reduction in the cost of living, each person eliminates their transportation fuel costs, each person on the planet. What happens when every person on the planet no longer has to work longer hours, more days of the year, just to pay those bills? Do some math. How much do you pay to heat your home every year? How much do you pay to cool your home every year? How much do you pay for food every year? How much do you pay for water every year? How much do you pay for transportation fuel every year? Get that number, and compare to my rough number here: 10,000 USD That is a rough but easy number for quick and easy math. Now multiply that by the number of human beings on the planet Earth. 10,000 times 6 billion 10,000 6,000,000,000 = 60,000,000,000,000 Per year The reason for me commenting in this way may not be clear to you, as you question my authority on matters of political economy, is to reason with you concerning REAL reality, not the false reality force feed into you since birth. The people who cause wars do so because failure to do so will transfer power from them to the millions of people who are their victims, and that very simple math problem above is meant to show you a score board that can be realized by the victims once the victims break the chains that bind them to the legal criminals who victimize the victims on purpose, for profit, or just for fun. Here is the score board created by the legal criminals: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Wishing that away, doesn't work, yet that score board is nothing, absolutely baseless, without any substance whatsoever, the moment enough people decide to stop it at once, in one instance, on one day, it no longer has any power what-so-ever. Falsehood is a power used by legal criminals in the work of exploiting their targeted victims, seen as a benefit on one end of the stick, and not so on the smelly end.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jan 13th, 2011 07:40 am |
|
52nd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Desperate Power Struggle It isn't a story about dependence or independence between people, so much as it is a dependence people have on the concept of justice, or equity, as people seek to remain alive by cooperating with each other on a daily basis. The link reports current news of people who become desperate as a direct result of powerful forces of nature. Read the report and then imagine your own life becoming a desperate struggle for power, do this chore along with me; so as to understand what I mean with my opening sentence above. Imagine that your life suddenly changes from what it is now to a beginning moment on a beginning day whereby electric power, natural gas, water, food, and communication stops flowing to you, and this situation lasts for some time - it is morning, you just wake up, you are freezing, hungry, dirty, and thirsty. You want to turn up the thermostat, but heat does not flow into the house. You want to cook some food, but the refrigerator is empty, and the stove doesn't work. You want to take a shower, but the water is freezing cold, and then that water stops flowing out of the shower head. You want try to get a drink before the water stops flowing but you see it all go down the drain instead. You first struggle to reconnect to the flow of information and much to your regret you find out that you are not alone in your desperate situation, it turns out that the whole city your home resides within has no power either, everyone else will soon wake up to the cold hard facts on that morning too. That is news. You find out that news, and you know it is true - hypothetically. What happens when everyone else in the city knows what you know too? What happens when everyone else wakes up too? That happening, when everyone else knows what you know too, is the first connection, and it is a just, or it is an equitable connection, everyone knows, and everyone knows that everyone else in the city is disconnected from electric power, natural gas power, gasoline power for cars, food power, and water power, no one has any, and everyone is equally desperate in that city, by that force of nature, that calamity, and that clear and present danger. Shift your view, from that scene, and imagine a city nearby, and in that city nearby things are different. Everyone in your city knows this fact too, that things are different in the next city. All the people in your desperate city are without power now, except one power, the power of knowing that all the people in the next city are different. How different? In the next city there are families in homes that can be exemplified by four homes you know about; whereby the first home is a home that has solar panels on top of the garage roof, and there are many solar panels, more solar panels than needed for that one home, enough solar panels for more than two homes - just in case. When there is too much electricity, the home owner sells excess. The home next to the solar panel home is a home that has solar panels on the roof of the green house where the family grows food and algae with a new vertical farming method. They also have enough solar panels for more than two homes, just in case. When they produce too much food, they make algae instead, or sell food, or sell algae. The third home has no solar panels, it has a well to pump water though, and a storage tank to store water, just in case, and a filtering system, and a need for power to pump the water high up in the air, so gravity can keep the water flowing, and just in case the electric power stops flowing from the neighbors: this home owner also has an emergency generator that will run as long as the water in the tank flows down through the turbine wheel. When the water tank is full: they sell water. The fourth home has a garage where the home owner takes raw algae and turns it into gasoline for vehicles and emergency generators and that fuel is stored in tanks when too much gasoline is produced over and above current consumption, the process of turning algae into fuel requires electric power, so this home has solar panels sufficient for one home and one algae fuel operation. When the tanks are full, they sell motor fuel. The four homes are typical in this city, next to your city, and everyone in your city knows this fact. Did the people in your city invest in bullets, instead? Go back to that morning, before everyone else wakes up, and imagine that everyone else in your city are about to wake up to the cold hard facts on this new hypothetical day, and imagine that you are the only one who knows about the city next you your city. What do you tell your fellow citizens if your fellow citizens have invested only in violence as a means of gaining necessary power, and what do they tell you about the cold hard facts, the real news? Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed May 25th, 2011 01:34 pm |
|
53rd Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/business/energy-environment/25coal.html?_r=1Balking at the high price of coal that fuels much of China’s electricity grid, the nation’s state-owned utility companies are defying government economic planners by deliberately reducing the amount of electricity they produce. Anyone, In whose best interest is it to govern down, to slow down, to decrease, or to limit the production of power? Know, please, Joe's Law. Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases (deflation, or more bang for the buck) because power reduces the cost of production. Everybody wins when the power supply reaches abundance. Who wins when the power supply is deliberately throttled down to a state of scarcity? There is only one logical answer to the question that asks who wins, in whose best interest, is power governed down, slowed down, to a level of scarcity, on purpose? This happens to also be the same answer as the question that asks who profits from aggressive wars for profit? The evidence happens to follow the same path to the same source. A monopoly producer has a vested interest in throttling down the supply of power to a level of scarcity so as to increase the price of power to whatever the monopoly market will bear, and if people must have power to survive, which they must, then people will pay any price, or suffer, or die. If competition exists: the competitor who throttles down power, below demand, so as to jack up the price, will lose the market share that competitor had won, once, as the customers choose to buy power from the supplier who does not govern down the power supply to a level of scarcity. Competition does not force a monopoly power into existence, the opposite is true: competition ends monopoly power. Look at the link at the top of the page. Know the facts. Don't believe the lies. Lies are produced for reasons. Lies do not occur by accident. You are targeted. You will be exploited. Stop being a victim. Know the truth instead. The utilities’ go-slow tactics include curtailing the planned expansion and construction of power plants, and running plants for fewer hours a day. And in a notable act of passive defiance, the power companies have scheduled an unusually large number of plants to close for maintenance this summer — right when air-conditioning season will reach its peak. A go-slow tactic can't work in a free market, go-slow tactics can't work to the benefit of the competitor who willfully reduces production below demand so as to increase the price as a result of enforced scarcity, not in a free market, because another competitor, absent the enforced monopoly which cannot enforce a state of scarcity, competitively fills in the demand with increased production as the go-slow tactic is tried, and the go-slow tactic fails, as the go-slow tactic is attempted by the failing competitor. Why is what I am reporting news to anyone? Who has been duped? Raise your hand. If you, the reader, can't see this, then that doesn't mean that you are right, and accurate, and reasonable, if you conclude that Joe Kelley is wrong, because you say so, and the official journalist who wrote the article above is right - just because you say so. Children also cover their eyes to make themselves invisible, it doesn't work, reality doesn't work that childish way. I can give you a very good example of a similar situation here in California. For a time that spans over a decade I've been working toward the power producing business, running into difficulties, and while working on this path one difficulty has been a law that protects the monopoly electric power companies, or the power cartel here in California, whereby any home power, by any home owner, sent into The Grid is consumed by other people, and paid for by other people, but the money went to the monopoly power companies, and the money didn't go to the home owner who produced excess power into The Grid. That law has just changed. Now anyone, as far as I know at this time, can double their investment in Solar Panels, or Wind Power Generators, or anything under the sun that hooks up to The Grid, and reap handsome rewards for that larger investment, such as a doubling of investment to be willfully twice the power the investor needs to consume his, or her, self. The single investment is to use money to begin making the required electricity at home, just enough Solar Panels to meet the home demand for electricity, and the doubling of the single investment is to produce a steady income, actual checks in the mail, money to be cashed, or money to be deposited into a savings account, or money to be invested, each month, flowing from the consumers of the electricity that you produce, then flowing to the no-longer-monopoly power company. and then those payments for the surplus electricity you produce, at home, is sent as a check printed by the power company, to you, because you produced the power that was consumed by the consumer. That is news. I offer you news. You prefer something else? What do you prefer? If there is a demand for lies, what will be produced? In the past the power companies kept any power you made in excess of the power you consumed, and they sell your power. Now, as far as I know so far, if you produce more power than you consume, the power company send you a check in the mail for that additional power they sell for you. I can go into great detail about how this type of thing bridges the gap between capitalist and socialist dogma, but that is another story. Back to the report about China: This time, the impasse between government and industry is not the only cause of China’s electricity shortages. Surging electricity demand is also a factor. Who runs whatever power is the power that enforces a monopoly? That question must be answered accurately, if the idea is to know anything about this topic. What stops every single person on the planet from borrowing enough credit (their own good faith and credit = borrowing from themselves) to buy enough solar panels to produce twice as much power as they alone can ever use, and then sell the excess power so as to generate an income, to pay back the loan, with a modest interest charged to the borrower and sent to the loan producers? You don't know the answer. You have never even heard the question. The knee jerk reaction is to cry, scream, or shout, no, just no, first, then more that no, as you recover control of your own mind. No, Joe, you are stupid for asking such an asinine question, stupid Joe. Stupid, stupid, Joe. You are so, incredibly, stupid, Joe. Who do yo think you are, Joe? The point is: I have nothing whatsoever to do with the question, and the knee jerk reaction measures your level of brain-washing. Either you ask, and then answer, the question, or you are programmed to ignore it, your behavior has be so modified as to be conditioned to respond to such questions with immediate focus of attention upon the messenger, going right past the message, and targeting the messenger instead of focusing on the message. If the shoe fits, you wear the shoe, cause it fits, not because I have reported go you that you are wearing the shoe. I have nothing to do with message. The message is the message, I am just me. If modern culture was the same culture as past culture in America, then Paul Revere would have been stoned to death, verbally, for the audacious crime of having rode through town yelling "The British are coming!". Stupid Paul. What power stops anyone from borrowing from their own good faith and credit so as to begin producing the electric power they need at home and doubling that investment so as to begin generating an income at home, so as to pay off the loan, and pay off a modest rate of interest that is sent back to the people who produce and maintain the loan account? Ignore that question. Do as you are trained to do, focus on me, target me, blame me, read from the script, and obey. Measure the problem, define the problem, yourself, by blaming me. Anyone anywhere on the planet Earth is now a potential competitor in the power producing industry - if you can see this happening - absent the force that stops this from happening. What stops the supply of power from meeting the demand for power anywhere on Earth? You can ignore the question, and you can focus your attention on the messenger instead, if that is what you allow yourself to do, by some force of external will power. What happened to your own power of will? You were born with one, what happened to it? The question isn't complex. The question is simple. The answer is simple. The information that is available to answer the question is abundant. What is OPEC? What stops the supply of power from reaching the demand for power anywhere on Earth? What is The Dollar Hegemony? What is Purchasing Power? Can you get as much Purchasing Power as you demand? What stops you from getting as much Purchasing Power as you demand? I'll return to the report on China (filled with official lies, half-truths, and confused, and irrational, viewpoints): In Yiyang, a town of 360,000 in south-central China, electricity shortages are so severe this spring that many homes and businesses receive power only one day in three. Even gasoline stations in this region are silent more days than not, because the pumps lack electricity. One of the things I write about, along the lines of my on-line presidential campaign, is the written documentation of two specific legal financial instruments, whereby these two things are meant to compete with, and dominate, the world reserve currency market, to take over as the dominate world reserve currency, in a very short time, and without possibility of usurpation, without ever being challenged effectively by any other monetary competitor, because these two products would be, for the foreseeable future, the highest quality money, at the lowest possible cost, and I'm not selling snake oil. I am reporting the facts. Competition in money markets will force money higher in quality and lower in cost, and my product 1 and product 2 offering illustrates one form that money could move toward, to illustrate the point that competition will force money higher in quality and lower in cost, once monopoly is no longer the power in forced. You can see the facts too. Can you see past the lies? In Yiyang, a town of 360,000 in south-central China, electricity shortages are so severe this spring that many homes and businesses receive power only one day in three. Even gasoline stations in this region are silent more days than not, because the pumps lack electricity. If you have read the article linked at the top of the page, and if you have arrived at the quote just quoted above, and you are at a level of understanding at this point, then please consider employing the concept of these two new legal financial products offered to anyone on the planet, while your conscious attention is focused upon this specific power struggle. Product 1 offers anyone who does not have a history of bad credit, or anyone with a history of good credit, a home and/or business property mortgage at no interest charged to the borrower. Effectively, measurably, and accurately, product 1 credits people who deserve credit, which cannot be argued against, not without resort to deceit, not without resort to threats of violence, and not without resort to use of violence as a means of discrediting the idea, and the actions, on this path. Credit those who earn credit. In whose interest is it not to do so? Product one allows those who earn credit to use their earned credit to buy, specifically, a loan, at no interest, for a new home, or a loan to buy off an existing loan (at high interest), or a new business property, at no interest charged to the borrower, who borrows from his, or her, own good faith and credit, that he, or she, earns him, or her, self. The two product idea stems from Joe's Law. Joe's Law is my earnings to date, in the form of one sentence. Why are those who earn credit not getting the credit they deserve? Why is power governed down to a state of scarcity? What is stopping the production of power from meeting the demand for power? Product one is my product of willful power used in the work of answering specific questions; questions that are typically left unanswered, because the specialists who are supposed to be answering these questions just so happen to be the same people who are willfully causing power to be governed down to a state of scarcity, because they profit by that willful act, and they profit at the expense of the powerless. Product 1 is purchased by one person in China, then two, then three, and Product 1 is not purchased by anyone in America, because product 1 is against the law in America; what happens? If you don't like the answer, then reverse the question. Product 1 is purchased by half the population in America. Product 1 is against the law in China. What happens? Half the population of America now has their monthly mortgage payments on their homes and on their business properties cut in half. Each month half the population of America has roughly 500 units of more money each month, Power to Purchase, to spend, to invest, or to save, compared to the case of reality whereby product 1 is against the law, the way thing are now. What happens to the power supply in America? The entire tax paying population in America, not the big corporations, they don't pay taxes, the actual honest productive tax paying people in America, send their surplus power to the monopoly bank cartel, in the form of interest payments, so as to have that money spent buying politicians to look the other way while financial fraud is perpetrated, and then, when financial fraud injures the victims, get this clear in your head, the money you send, is then spent on rewarding the criminals with trillion dollar bail outs, as a reward for injuring you. That is the true story of how things work in America. Measure that reality. Things can get worse. If China takes over as The World Reserve Currency Monopoly Power, how will that change be measured by you? When power is even more scarce in America, more scarce in America than it is in China, including clean air power, will you listen then, will you be powerful enough to do anything about it then? Product 2 is a 1 percent interest loan offered to anyone on the planet, and this can easily be done electronically, through an effective, competitive, on-line web based, encrypted, backed-up, and well maintained, and well scrutinized, system of accurate accounting, and done by way of license, and done competitively, by competing franchises, new franchises, or existing franchises, like E-Bay, Skype, Amazon, Microsoft, or even any open source competitor, whereby the accounting franchises maintain their own market share competitively. The accounting franchises offer product 1, and product 2, to customers, as specified, according to the specifications of product 1, and product 2, and anyone, anywhere, can buy product 1, or product 2, on-line, and begin employing their own power of credit, that they earn. Product 2 charges 1 percent interest so as to make a profit for the accounting franchises, so as to cover the cost of accounting, as the franchises account for the flow of power realized in the production and use of product 1 and product 2, as time goes by. Product 2, according to specifications, are loans sold and then used in the effort to make more power, such as a loan that is used to buy Solar Panels, or Electric Cars, or Modular Vertical Farming Units, or Wind Mills, to name a few possible power producers that could be specified on product 2 loans. The specifications that must be met are calculations that confirm a net increase in power over and above the power spent on the thing purchased. The Solar Panel exemplifies the concept for product 2. But first a borrower may borrow product 1, and cut his, or her, monthly mortgage payment in half. A borrower then has savings each month, or potential investment power each month, or more money to spend each month, thereby creating demand for other people to produce the new things demanded as a result of Product 1 savings. That is product 1 alone. Product 2 pays for itself, even without product 1. Product 2, in the exemplary case of the Solar Panel, allows the purchaser to borrow from his potential income increase realized by the thing purchased with Product 2; because product 2, by design, by specification, produces power, or nets a measured savings. The Product 2 borrower has, for example, a 100 dollar monthly electric bill, a historically accurate average monthly payment of money sent, monthly, to the central power monopoly company, which is known, a known cost, a measured cost average, and that can be cut down by 10% according to known measures today. 100 dollars per month on average, can be cut down by 10% today, by investing in Solar Panels, and that savings is gaining in economic value for many reasons, easily moving to 15% savings, and more, and more savings. Product 2 is then used to buy twice as much power production, an equivalent to 200 dollars per month of electricity to be produced by enough Solar Panels purchased. The Product 2 loan, done this way (but not necessarily done this way), amounts to a lower monthly cost of electricity, less per month paid by the home owner, to pay the loan, 180 dollars per month to pay off the loan, and an income stream of 100 dollars per month, paid to you from The Grid, to spend, or to invest, or to save. You borrow enough to buy 200 dollars worth of electric production monthly, save 10% on each 100 dollars worth of electricity produced, a 180 dollar a month loan payment, you no longer pay 100 dollars a month in electricity, and you receive 100 dollars worth of cash for the 100 dollars a month of electricity you send into The Grid. 180 dollar per month loan payment, you get 100 dollar per month worth of electricity, and you get a 100 dollar check each month. Before investment you spend 100 dollars for 100 dollars worth of power sold on The Grid. After investment you have to pay 180 (an amount that is a rough estimate based upon actual offers by companies who sell you Solar Panels and guarantee a lower electric bill as you pay off the loan for the Solar Panels) per month while you get 100 dollars worth of electricity; 180 minus 100 equals 80. So you pay 80 per month instead of 100 per month for electricity. Cutting the investment in half will reduce your savings down to 10 dollars per month. Investing 4 times as much as you use at home increases your income to 40 dollars per month. It takes money to make money, as the saying goes. If one month you use less electricity, you get a bigger check that month. You use more electricity, you get less electricity per month. Get this concept in your mind, it is important, it is significant. Get it. If you don't get it, ask questions. Do the research. Know the facts. Electric power is power, money is power or it isn't money. Product 2 can be used to buy a car too. When your old car wears out, you need a new one, or you want to start a competitive taxi or delivery business, you buy electric vehicles, you have to pay back the loan, at 1 percent interest, just like you have to pay back the loan for any car purchase, now your interest rate is 1 percent, not 5, not 10, but your new electric car costs you about 80% less in fuel costs, and you make the fuel at home, if you have invested in Solar Panels at home, and/or, at your business property. If you now spend 100 dollars a month on gas, the petroleum stuff, you now spend 18 dollars on electric power for transportation; you add savings to savings. If you started a competitive taxi, or delivery business, you can compete with anyone who also goes into the electric transportation business, as electric converted businesses compete against the petroleum powered competitors who will be paying more than 80% more for transportation fuel; if petroleum fuel prices stay as low as they are, and at 80% more costly compared to electric power prices, per mile. Petroleum prices have to fall significantly before they can compete with electric power prices. Will oil prices fall? Do you understand this, or, instead, does this go right over your head, or do you suffer from the brainwashing, and are you jerking your knee, are you targeting the messenger, instead of focusing your attention on the facts? How about adding up Product 1 and Product 2 as the wave sweeps America and all those who buy into a higher quality and lower cost money system do the following average estimate of savings: 1. $500 dollars saved on home mortgage interest payments per month. 2. $1000 dollars saved on business property mortgage interest payments per month 3. $40 dollars saved, or checks in the mail from The Grid, on Solar Panel (or other) electric power producers at home and work. (farms and rural area wind mills are already going up in California) 4. $80 dollars saved on transportation fuel for those who must upgrade a car anyway, or those who can't afford not to cut down on their petroleum expenses, for whatever reason dreamed up. $1,620 per month for a number of Americans who decide to make use of 2 competitive legal financial products that merely illustrate what can happen when competition in legal money is no longer against the law (criminal law). What if the number of people, who decide not to pay usury, and decide not to pay for oil, etc, is One Hundred Million people out of the total population in American, which is roughly Three Hundred Million people? Just add the number of zeros and arrive at the amount of power that remains in the hands of the productive American population, and arrive at the power that no longer flows into the pyramid scheme that sucks the life blood out of the American Dream. 1620 100,000,000 162,000,000,000 What if China offers Chinese honest productive people those products; while America continues to outlaw legal money competition? At 1.3 billion, a third of which is roughly Four Hundred Million. 162 x 4 = 648 Same number of zeros: 648,000,000,000 Do you have that understood? That is power, per month, kept by the honest productive people, instead of that same measure of power flowing from the honest productive people flowing to the legal criminals who run their legal money monopolies in America compared, competitively, to the power stolen in China, per month. America: 100,000,000 people each, realizing 1,620 dollars per month savings, or production, to be spent, invested, or saved, each month. China: 400,000,000 people each, realizing as much power per month, each, savings, or production, to be spent, invested, or saved, each month. Combined, American, and Chinese, productive people potentially save more, if they cooperated, trade, and do so equitably. Exploited, American, and Chinese, productive people, by a few powerful legal criminals is what is, that is what is now happening, and it is happening by the rough measure I illustrate with product 1 and product 2. What happens if America legalizes monetary competition while China remains exploited by legal monetary monopoly, to the tune of the measure I offer with product 1 and product 2? $162,000,000,000 per month saved/earned/produced in America while China remains exploited? How long before America regain full economic dominance, peaceful, productive, and liberated economic dominance compared to the exploited competition? What happens if China is liberated to that very possible (if not likely) tune offered with the reasonably understandable product 1 and product 2 illustration? $648,000,000,000 per month commanded by the honest productive people in China, while America remains exploited by the legal power monopolies; The Federal Reserve people in particular? Product 1 and Product 2 illustrate that which is against the law now. Competition is against the law in China. Competition is against the law in America. If Product 1, and Product 2, were lawful products in America and not allowed in China, what do you think will happen? I know what will happen. You may be, reasonably, skeptical. Use your own brain. Returning to the article on China:
Please use your own brain. Stop reading from the script. The above is false, it is lies, it is parroting business as usual, it is ignorant if not willfully deceitful. Within Product 2 is the illustrated example of what can happen when competition is legal, and when monopoly is no longer enforced. A home owner can buy a Modular Home Vertical Farming Unit, or two, or three, and begin producing algae based diesel fuel, at home, and sell that power because that power is in demand now. The same investment can then be used to make algae based gasoline, for home use, or for sale, if gasoline is in demand. The same investment can be used, reconfigured, to make food, for home use, or for sale. One Modular Unit can be a home food supplier, and another can be a for sale, for profit, food producer, or algae based diesel fuel home use, and profit making venture, or gasoline. What stops the production of power from meeting the demand for power? If the question is willfully ignored, then willful ignorance is the answer to the question. If you don't ask, what does that confess? If you then blame me, what does that confess to you? I know what it confesses to me, I've been on this road for decades. Back to the article; on China. Prices of Chinese exports are already up 2.8 percent in the last 12 months, after years of gradual decline that helped restrain inflation in the United States. Joe's Law cuts through all that bull. Inflation is America is a direct result of monopoly power used in America to cut down the production of power in America. There are many examples, the law that forbids home owners from profiting from home produced electric power is one example. Blaming inflation, falsely, or half-true, on rising prices in China, resulting from scarce supplies of electric power in China, misses the mark. Power (electric power in China or America) produced to exceed the demand will reduce the price (or failure to even meet the demand will increase the price) of power, while purchasing power increases. I stop that sentence above at that point. You will have to figure this out yourself. Joe's Law is clear. Your mind may not be clear. When purchasing increases the increase in purchasing power can be called deflation; because each unit of money buys more; it deflates. Why are things made complex? Know the difference between increases and decreases in the power to purchase. If your money buys more today, compared to yesterday, your money is deflating, and the term "inflation" is meant to be confusing, because confusion is a state of powerlessness. Those who know why things are made to be confusing, on purpose, for profit, are not confused. Victims are confused, on purpose, for profit. Back to the report; on China: If Beijing and the utilities can resolve their differences, China plans to build even more coal-powered plants. Doing so would produce another big surge in emissions of greenhouse gases, of which China is already the world’s largest emitter. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a city with a brown haze covering it is a health hazard for the people breathing in brown air. It also doesn't take a genius to figure out that many people, half the population as a rough average, making algae in their back yards, can provide all the power needed for the themselves, and sell extra power to the other half of the population. Do you know that the fuel used in the production of Algae is CO2? If the supposed leaders of the supposed free world suddenly suffered a fit of moral conscience, or conscious accurate awareness, so long as the story line here is fantasy, and those leaders declared war on powerlessness, and they ordered, as they are apt to do, the immediate production, at home, of algae based fuel, to demand that half the population immediately commence the production of algae based fuel at home, to produce more that twice each home owners own needs for fuel, power, so as to have more than enough power for everyone, how much CO2 would that war on powerlessness consume, and what do you think would be the waste product? Algae consumes CO2 and Algae, as far as I know, produces, as a waste product, oxygen. So the leaders of the free world declare war on powerlessness and they order half the population to begin producing algae fuel and make fuel too abundant, so abundant that the price of power is at the same price as clean oxygen, and a byproduct of that decision is a shrinking supply of CO2, and an expanding supply of clean oxygen world wide. And, unfortunately for some, the petroleum based oil business shrinks down to the size of, say, the whale oil business, a historical footnote. Note that I don't call the petroleum business by the false name Fossil Fuel. That is another story. Back to the report; on China. “Only coal can provide new capacity in the time and scale needed,” said David Fridley, a China energy expert at the University of California, Berkeley. A monopoly is, by definition, the absence of competition. By whatever force, or power, that competition is forced out, the absence of competition remains to be the definition of monopoly, like cold is the absence of heat. Know this, please. If America can declare war on both German and Japan, and in a few years time the honest productive workers, and the misguided soldiers, win those wars, why can't Americans declare war on powerlessness, and in a few years Americans win that war? Do you want the truth? The answer is easy to see. America first has to declare war on falsehood, and overnight Americans can win that battle. This is not news. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henryford136294.html It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. Back to the report on China: The idea of recalcitrant utilities balking at Beijing’s dictates might seem to contradict the popular perception of China’s government-guided economy. But while the electric utilities are majority-owned by the government, they are also profit-motivated companies accountable to the other holders of their publicly traded stock. So the power companies’ incentives are not necessarily aligned with those of central planners in Beijing. The angle of view being reported is such that the power struggle is honest, and the power struggle is a known problem, and the power struggle involves honest people working hard to solve the known problem, and the angle of view suggests that the problem is very difficult to solve, and the angle of view suggests that mistakes will be made, and the angel of view suggests that the problem will be solved, if it can be solved, some day. That is a pure fantasy. All anyone has to do, if anyone wants to expose the truth, is a simple decision, followed by willful action, along many possible paths. You have to decide that you want to know the truth. Then you have to willfully employ your power toward achieving that goal. You can follow many paths, and one path you can choose to follow is a path offered to you by someone, like me, who has been on this path for decades. I offer one curious acronym: CAFR http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=ldymls&pq=cafr&xhr=t&q=cafr+exposed+walter+burien&cp=13&pf=p&sclient=psy&source=hp&aq=0v&aqi=&aql=&oq=cafr+exposed+&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e4d813b43c7d221c&biw=1920&bih=937 Choose the path, go down the path, failure to do so will be a state of powerlessness. They are criminals, they commit crimes, they are not solving problems, they are problems, they do not provide solutions, they cause the problems. Know it, or remain powerless. It is possible, but certainly not known by me, that the Chinese Communist Government leaders are working to solve their powerless problem. Suppose that is true. What happens if the Chinese Communist Government leaders solve their problem of losing power with the solution of empowering billions of Chinese tax payers, which is the source of power flowing to the Chinese Government leaders? Do you think that the Chinese Communist Government leaders are concerned enough to know that billions of Chinese tax payers may become too powerful, and powerful enough to over power the Chinese Communist Government leaders? Did you ask yourself the following question: Who wins when the power supply is deliberately throttled down to a state of scarcity? That is the question I chose to begin this offering to you. The leadership at the top of OPEC, or Mobile, or Halliburton, or Wall Street, or U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), or China, have more in common with each other than they have with any honest productive person on the question of power. Who has a vested interest in making sure that power remains scarce, and therefore who has a vested interest in making sure that there is no competition? Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. More power is better for everyone except people who choose crime as a method of earning a living. You may have to look in the mirror. You may not actually want to know the truth, and that confesses something significant. But Chinese regulators have let electricity prices climb only 2.5 percent this spring. Residential users in China’s cities pay 8.2 cents a kilowatt-hour. That compares to a national average of 11 cents in the United States and 15 cents in the heavily urban mid-Atlantic region. Chinese industrial users in cities are supposed to pay 12 cents a kilowatt-hour, although politically connected businesses receive discounts; the average industrial rate in the United States is 7 cents, and 9 cents in the mid-Atlantic region. Note the ease with which the reporter accomplishes the difficult task of converting the disparity between measures of power between the "United States" and China. How is that accomplished? Do you find the quote above to be an accurate report of reality? What is the formula used in that report by which the cost of power is known in the "United States" compared to the cost of power in China? This is significant information, and if it is accurate information, then it is significantly useful information. The reporter uses the word cents. Chinese people do not use cents. Chinese people use a money that is an exclusive legal monopoly in China. The use of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) money, or The Federal Reserve money, to be more accurate, as the money by which Chinese power costs will be measured is an obvious choice, since the report is in English, and the report is obviously targeting people in America, or "The West", and therefore people in "The West" will understand the value of a cent. America power costs about 12 cents per Kilowatt/hour. If you are following this, having read the report on China, and you are reading my comments, then you are now being directly involved in the same process by which I formed Joe's Law. Power is power, or it isn't power. Money is: The Power to Purchase, or it isn't money. The measure of money is the measure of how powerful it is, and the same is true of electric power. Electric power is constant power, measurable as a watt, a watt does not increase value (deflate), and a watt does not decrease value (inflate). No politician on Earth can change the value of a watt. American power costs about 12 cents per Kilowatt/hour. Chinese power costs about 10 cents per Kilowatt/hour. I am offering the above statements as an illustration, not as a factual account of the rough average of actual price of electricity. The illustration intends to clue the reader in on the significance of this measure of power. Note how the article does not actually report anything of use in this goal of knowing the relative price of power between America and China. I am offering a guess, and my guess is that Chinese power is priced less than American power, and I do so not suggesting that my guess is true, only suggesting that starting point so as to proceed with the significance of that measure - if it is true. If it is true that power is prices less in China compared to the higher price for power in America, if that is true, then, China is more competitive. That is a significant fact, if it is true. If, on the other hand, it is not true, then America is more competitive. If you do not understand that, then you can, and you may be empowered in knowing the truth of that understanding - once you understand it. Make it personal. By making it personal, you can understand it. If America is more powerful, it is more competitive, so, naturally, if you are more powerful, then you are more competitive, and if your neighbor is even more powerful, compared to a Chinese person in China, then the measure of how much more powerful America is, compared to China, is thereby defined and defined accurately. How are you more powerful? What would happen if you could borrow from yourself and stop paying for two homes, whereby the mortgage interest rate you pay, each month, is sent to someone else, where someone else has enough money to buy a home, a home you pay for, and instead of buying another home, your money is being invested in China, and invested in China so as to rape, torture, and murder anyone who gets in the way of that home grown money monopoly business that manages to convince you, every month, to keep sending that money, and even more money that that mortgage interest money, in the form of involuntary taxes, making you less powerful, each month, and making them (the legal criminals) more powerful each month? Make it personal. If America is more powerful than China it is only more powerful because Americans are still able to produce more surplus wealth than Americans consume, while Americans are being robbed through mortgage interest and taxation, compared to the crimes going on in China, as the honest productive Chinese people are similarly victimized. There are two groups. A. Honest productive people. B. Criminals. Those who pay the price for power, and those who steal power from those who pay the price for power. The article about China is either written by an ignorant person in the honest productive people group, or it is written by a person in the criminal group, and the measure of the article, no matter who wrote it, is measurable by how the words affect the readers of the words. Are you inspired to keep transferring your earnings to people who may then use the power you sent them against you? Are you inspired to use some of your power investing in China? What are you inspired to do, as a result of reading the article? I'm curious. I am inspired to comment on the article, my work is this paper trail you are now reading, or speed reading; assuming a lot on my part. The price of electricity is as important of a measure of which country is more powerful as is the price of money, which is, the price of money is: Interest. When powerful money is abundant, as abundant as powerful electricity, both prices go down, because the price of things that are abundant, like the price of sunlight, or the price of clean air, is lower, and lower, and lower, as it becomes more, and more, abundant. When powerful money is scarce, or electricity is scarce, or motor fuel is scarce, or clean air is scarce, or sunlight is scarce (nuclear winter), then who must pay that price? Why is powerful money scarce? Why is electricity scarce? Why is motor fuel scarce? Why is clean air scarce? The answer is simple. There are people who make those things scarce on purpose, because they profit from that work, to make those things scarce, and to make those things scarce they must first gain the power needed, and then they must then use the power they steal, in the work that eliminates competition, which must happen, or failure to make that happen results, inevitably, in competition, whereby someone else will produce that which is demanded, be it more powerful money, or more electricity, or more motor fuel, or more clean air. Example: Algae can be produced cheaply, independently, to replace coal, petroleum, and natural gas, as a fuel, and the process of producing that cheap and abundant fuel consumes CO2, and that process produces oxygen, so, put on your thinking caps, why is that fact not common knowledge known by any supposed political economy expert, reporting how bad, or how good, the news is today? That is all I have to report today, and I have yet to edit this present offering, and the kitchen is a mess, and it is already 10:32 AM May, 25 2011. 1:10 PM and I have to get to work, no time to clean the kitchen, no time to finish editing.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon May 30th, 2011 10:10 pm |
|
54th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Oil scarcity enforcement
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jun 3rd, 2011 02:58 pm |
|
55th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones 06-03-2011 10:14am PDT I hear Alex speak of being labeled as a "Conspiracy Theorist" and then Alex says that he is proud to wear that title, or some such words expressing the concept. I want to teach Alex Jones a lesson about this false label stuff, and I will use history to convey, or illustrate, the process of false labels, I will use the example of the Anti-Federalists; who were the "Conspiracy Theorists" of the day, back in the days before the Legal Criminals (or Globalists, or Elite, or whatever term works for you, so long as you accurately identify the planers and the executors of the global take over by way of legal monopoly money extortion fraud); before the Legal Criminals threw out the working experimental Federated Democratic Republic (enforcing peaceful, voluntary, and welcome competition among separate and sovereign States), and before the Legal Criminals ushered in their criminal dictatorship, Nation State, Consolidated Government, enabled into law by The Constitution fraud, in that time period, the Anti-Federalists were the modern day "Conspiracy Theorists" and one of them, a vocal member of that Conspiracy Theory group, was a man named Patrick Henry. Patrick Henry was a "Conspiracy Theorist" of his day; the false label of that day was "Anti-Federalist". Patrick Henry speaks for himself (better than I can by a wide margin): http://www.constitution.org/afp/phenry00.htm Right now, coincidentally, Alex Jones is interviewing someone who is offering American History. Will Alex Jones, and anyone Alex Jones interviews, ever expose the true nature of The Constitution, as Patrick Henry, one of histories famous "Conspiracy Theorists", did, in his speeches in opposition to The Constitution fraud. Know this much: You are labeled exactly the opposite of what you are by the people who steal your money power, your power to produce surplus wealth is stolen from you by the same people who invent, and then propagate the false labels attached to you, and the modern example is "Conspiracy Theorist". The past example was "Anti-Federalist". For the crime of questioning the common, popular, and fashionable, theories of conspiracy, you are labeled the opposite of what you intend to accomplish. If you oppose the official tendency to stop the process of finding out who actually commits crimes, and if you oppose the official tendency to excuse the failure to actually expose the criminals who commit crimes by claiming that the crimes are perpetrated by a nebulous, mysterious, unknown "Conspiracy Theory", then you are labeled a "Conspiracy Theorists" for your effort to expose the folly of "Conspiracy Theory". You want to know the truth, you question the "official" version of the truth, which is a true conspiracy theory, you question the validity of the official theory of conspiracy, you question the official version of the truth, which is a theory of conspiracy, and you are blamed for that very thing, as you are somehow, by some power, given, the name "Conspiracy Theory", and that mud, thrown on you, sticks, with some power of glue. Got that? Here comes the History lesson, for you, given to you, by me, since I did my home work, and you did not. During the time period between British oppression and America defense a number of honest productive people fled Britain and began prospering in America, and to do so they invented their own money, called Stamp Script, and they began to experiment with governments fashioned after such things as Magna Carte (with Trial by Jury = each legal person has the power to veto any law) and a Republic, such as the model offered by the Swiss. Ask: How can the Swiss avoid World War I and World War II while those wars where perpetrated all around that working Republic? During that time period when honest productive Americans began an experimental Federated Democratic Republic the Legal Criminals from Britain invaded America so as to enforce their despotism upon the honest productive American people, to enslave them, to take the surplus wealth created by them, and then to use that power against them. Like this: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Break: I'll quote and continue after reporting that Alex Jones' guest is speaking about England and their spies. Did you know that Alexander Hamilton, one of the men behind the move to create The Constitution, and one of the men exposed by the "Anti-Federalists" (like Patrick Henry) was accused of being an agent for the British Monarchy, and, on top of that Alexander Hamilton confesses, openly, a preference for a Monarchy over the less dictatorial Federated Democratic Republic. Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. So, in that time period, between British rule, and the ratification of The Constitution, a time existed when America was governing itself within an enabling document called The Articles of Confederation, and that power, that American power, with the help of the French, defeated, and drove out, the largest military power on the planet, and it did so with an all volunteer Army. It did that with Separate and Sovereign States within a voluntary (States can join or separate voluntarily) Union under The Articles of Confederation. In that time period the Nationalists hatched a plan to seize dictatorial control over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and usher in Dictatorship by way of an enforced money monopoly power. Alexander Hamilton was one of the Nationalists pushing that plan into effect. In order to get away with that fraud the Nationalists had to hide themselves behind a false front. The Nationalists chose, and then hid behind, the false front of Federalism. The Nationalists called themselves Federalists. Do you understand that history so far? The Nationalists, seeking dictatorial powers over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and seeking a legal money monopoly power, could not get away with their crime, if they openly, and publicly, confessed that they were Nationalists, and they could not get away with that crime if they confessed that they were planning to enforce a legal money monopoly power, so, they claimed that they were Federalists. Got that? Why did they claim that they were Federalists? They claimed that they were Federalists because the concept of federalism was the government of choice at the time, a Federated Democratic Republic was as voluntary as a government could be at the time, and it was a form of government that made use of competition between Separate and Sovereign State governments, whereby one State growing more dictatorial would find their tax payers voting with their feet and moving to other Separate and Sovereign States within the voluntary Federated Democratic Republic, and the concept works, is proven to work, at that time, with specific examples of how it works, such as Shays's Rebellion as one shinning example of how it works. There is much more to how it works, including the concept of Trial by Jury, and other things, things addressed by Patrick Henry, at the time, as Patrick Henry tried to expose the Nationalists, as Patrick Henry tried to lift the thin cloak of false Federalism, and Patrick Henry tried to champion Federalism. So, do you have that understood up to this point, and if so, guess what the Nationalists did to people like Patrick Henry, and all those who opposed Nationalism; what did the Nationalists (hiding behind a false front of Federalism) do to the Federalists who opposed the Nationalists? Are you out of guesses? The Nationalists, who were promising Federalism to the gullible massive mobs of the majority, were being exposed by the actual Federalists, and so, the Nationalists ran a false advertisement campaign, and they invented another false label, and they effectively inspired the gullible massive mobs of the majority to attach that false label to the actual Federalists who opposed the Nationalists, and that false label is: Anti-Federalists. Do you see the connection yet? Today a "Conspiracy Theorist" is a person who is against the official conspiracy theories, for many reasons that a person may become against the official conspiracy theory, a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, and once a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, that person who has become against the official conspiracy theory is then labeled, by some mysterious power of falsehood, a "Conspiracy Theorist" for becoming against the official conspiracy theory. Got that? If you become aware of the fact that the official conspiracy theory is false, or could be false, or could be less than accurate, you will then set out in opposition of blind belief in that official conspiracy theory, and for that, for that turn of events in your life, you will then be labeled a "Conspiracy Theorist". Got that? What is the historical president? If you were living in the time period between the prosperous American revolution and The Constitution and you became aware of the crimes being perpetrated by the Nationalists hiding behind a false front of Federalism, and you then began to support Federalism in opposition to Nationalism, you would have then been labeled an Anti-Federalist, and that label would stick up to today. Today, we are taught, that the "Founding Fathers" created a Republic with The Constitution, when, in fact, the opposite was perpetrated. What do you call me, for the crime of delivering the message to you? You can call me Anti-Constitution, or an Anti-American who opposes The Constitution. Will that be true, half true, ignorant, or deliberately false if you do so. What do I support, actually, and how can you know if you dictate to me that which I support, despite any effort on my part to keep your mud off of me, since I prefer not to have the mud you place on me stick to me? The Constitution is what it is, and it enables that which people do, including such things as Suppressing Rebellions, such as the historical example offered by The Whiskey Rebellion. The Constitution was used, by those who constructively interpreted it, because it was designed to be constructively interpreted, to create a legal monopoly bank, then another one, and then a better one in the form of The FED. The Constitution was used, again by those who constructively interpreted it, to solve The Indian Problem, with that Final Solution, and the same enabling document was used to enforce Slavery, and the same enabling document was used to perpetrate The Civil War, as two competing criminal governments waged war over control of the honest productive victims of their separate and sovereign despotic forms of government - slaves on both sides. Different colors, same business as usual, business cycle, legal monopoly money enforcement fraud competitors, fighting over turf. If it was a true Federated Democratic Republic it would not have allowed The Whiskey Rebellion, the people rebelling against the legal money monopoly fraud in Pennsylvania would not have had to face a conscripted Army run by the new Dictator as the new Dictator crushed "so fatal a Spirit" the same Spirit of 1776. What is that power that enables a person who is against dictatorship, a person who is for liberty, whereby a person who becomes a supporter of liberty, and whereby a person who becomes against dictatorship, is then labeled with a label that is the exact opposite? What is the measure of that power? What is the nature of that power? What is the character of that power? What is the constitution of that power? If you don't know, it is past time for you to know, failure to know is ignorance, but once you are asked, failure to know is willful ignorance, and considering the weight of the consequences for failing to know, I am informing you of the fact that willful ignorance at this point amounts to stupidity. Stupid people are powerless against the power of falsehood, and all the costs that go with that mire. Gather up enough stupid people into one network, so long as some of those stupid people can produce more than they consume, and once you do that, in your own mind's eye, measure the power that can be sucked out of that network, and if you have read this far, and if you have that pile of stupid people, working harder and harder, in your mind, and you begin to imagine the amount of power that can be sucked out of that network of hard working stupid people, when you got that, keep it in view long enough to look at the next link. http://www.usdebtclock.org/
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Aug 6th, 2011 10:00 pm |
|
56th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RqqGIwCFW8&feature=player_embedded Anyone, Within that video are a few statements concerning Oil prices. Please understand how things that are productive power supplies are different from things that are not productive power supplies. Too many chairs, for example, is not the same thing as too many kilowatt/hours of electricity. You can understand the significant difference in many ways, and I can start explaining the significant differences with those two examples above. Producing too many chairs will cause the price of chairs to go down, as everyone has chairs, and there are now too many chairs, so making more chairs, when there are too many chairs, is an example of malinvestment, or spending productive power in such a way as to cause higher costs of living and lower standards of living on a net, overall, average, basis. One person making too many chairs is not the same thing as, say, The Federal Reserve Chairman increasing the money supply by double and then lending that money at less than the rate of inflation in interest, which is negative interest, or paying someone to use the money, and making sure that the borrower only makes chairs with double the supply of money, or for failing to do that with the money, as punishment: The Federal Reserve Chairman cuts off any more money to the chair maker. Well the chair maker may complain, saying, ahhhh, dude, there are already way too many chairs, and you want me to use the entire sum of the current money supply, which you just doubled, and you hand me a check for that much money, and you want me to make nothing but chairs, ahhh, don't you now that that is stupid, not to mention how that is criminal, since so many people are in dire need of their personal earnings, and doing this will cut their personal earnings in half, by you ordering me to do this, this waste, this criminal waste of all that power to purchase, which amounts to a tax on all those people who are paid in dollars? That is how things work when working with chairs, which is not as bad as working with destructive things like lies, threats of violence, and acts of violence upon the innocent, which is much more criminally wrong than abusing double the money supply power in the work of making too many chairs, so let's run that chair example through to see how that analogy works out before moving on to the net affect of abusing double the money supply on producing too many lies, too many threats of violence, and too many acts of violence upon the innocent, which is another analogy, on a scale of analogies, and then we can move onto an analogy of abusing double the money supply on producing productive power. We did this: 1. What happens if Ben orders too many chairs, when doubling the total supply of dollars. We can do this next: 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. And then: 3. What happens when Ben orders too many kilowatt/hours of electricity production, when doubling the total supply of dollars. So, as you can see, if you understand the video at the top of the page, that Ben is taxing us, and you can also understand that Ron thinks that Ben is not doing good, and you can understand that if Ben had ordered the production of only chairs, by doubling the money supply, and paying a chair making to make only chairs with double the money supply of dollars, then things wouldn't be good in America as a result. You can think the "too many chairs" scenario through, a little better, before moving into the next two examples on the scale we are constructing here and now. A lot of wood is needed, and there will be a lot of chairs produced with double the money supply that was in circulation in 2008. Ben doubles the money supply in 2008, orders chairs, nothing but chairs, and a whole lot of trees are cut down, to make chairs. Soon everyone has enough chairs, and actually almost everyone already has enough chairs, so what happens to all the new chairs ordered by Ben? Ben and the chair producer purchased by Ben could stack the chairs up and form one gigantic pyramid of chairs, and when someone wants one, the chair guy can sell one from the gigantic pyramid of chairs, while everyone else has to contend with higher prices, and everyone else is still paid the same wage, or less, since all that money was spent making a pyramid of chairs. Thanks Ben. Thanks for causing the prices on everything to double, while our pay stays the same, so that you can make a whole lot of Chairs. The net increase in the standard of living is measurable as chairs. The net cost of living increases measurable as the difference between the increase in prices and the lack of increase in earnings, or the disparity between rising prices and rising earnings (not just wages). If the chair dude can't pay back the loan, the loan that Ben gave the chair guy, for less cost to the chair guy, less "interest rate" that is less than the rate of inflation, which amounts to someone paying someone to take out a loan, then Ben can bail him out too, after he defaults too, with more of what used to be your money, Ben can call up his buddies who help with the bail out paperwork. Do you have it clear in your mind how chairs can be a bad investment when doubling the money supply of legal dollars and then spending that much money on making more chairs? Now we can move to doubling the money supply so as to start a few, or many, more aggressive wars for profit in other countries where there are a lot of goodies to steal, such as oil, gold, diamonds, and another added feature to these aggressive wars for profit is the feature by which the competition can be eliminated, as those competitors sell their stuff to China, Russia, Brazil, Cuba (if they can get past the blockade), Iran (blockaded), Palestine (blockaded), Venezuela, and other places. And there is the additional feature of eliminating world competitors in money markets, so as to keep The Dollar Hegemony, on top. The down side for some, but an additional up side for a very few at the top, is, too bad for everyone else: World War III. 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. Ben pays people to borrow money to start wars. Not chairs. The interest rate charged for loaning out double the money supply is an effective negative interest rate, or it is the same thing as paying someone to loan money, so Ben makes an offer that can't be refused, if the borrowers have no working moral conscience, and they won't look the gift horse in the mouth. They take the money and they start the wars, they are rewarded handsomely. Ben pats them on the back, and they pat Ben on the back, a jolly good crew. Too many aggressive wars for profit, and what happens? Well, it can be well understood that the pyramid of chairs won't be built. There will be a pyramid of dead bodies, and as well as the case with the pyramid of chairs there will be a whole lot of people whose standard of living decreases while their costs of living increase because their power was malinvested, from their viewpoint. From the viewpoint of Ben, and those who are rewarded for torture, and mass murder, the investment was very sound, and they laugh all the way to what used to be your bank. Reality is a bitch. That is 2 divisions, now, on the scale being shown to you. I can offer pictures too. There are many high definition pictures that depict aggressive wars for profit, piles of bodies, and I can draw a picture of a mountain of chairs, but I am going to give the few readers here a measure of credit concerning their ability to use their own imagination. 1. What happens if Ben orders too many chairs, when doubling the total supply of dollars. 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. 3. What happens when Ben orders too many kilowatt/hours of electricity production, when doubling the total supply of dollars. What happens in example 3 on the scale of what happens when malinvestment measures up on a scale of worst to best? Keep in mind that one person's evaluation of good isn't as good as the next person's, depending upon who is doing the evaluating. Note too that only Ben can double the money supply of legal collars. Ron can't. You can't. I can't. And get away with it. And do it again. Suppose Ben doubles the supply of dollars and pays someone to borrow that much power to purchase, before that money can cause inflation, Ben spends it first, Ben buys a borrower, the next guy spends it second, and Ben only loans this money out to someone who will make more kilowatt/hours of electricity, or else, the same rule applies, you don't do what Ben says, you don't get paid to borrow money again. Ben has power, you don't. Ben has your power. You don't. You are intimately connected to Ben by way of the legal dollar, too bad for you. So the money supply is what is was before Ben doubled the money supply, and then Ben wrote a check equal to the total supply of legal dollars currently in circulation, and Ben buys as many more kilowatt/hours of electricity that can be produced with double the supply of legal dollars, and Ben says hurry up. Work that out some. What happens if the borrower does as told in various ways, such as, creating nothing but Solar Panels, selling them to whoever will use them, so as to increase the number of kilowatt/hours produced? Will that do? Will Ben be happy? What happens to the price of electricity if Ben creates double the supply of legal dollars and then Ben orders nothing but more electricity produced with that increase in the total supply of dollars, and the order is filled, and in one year all that money makes that much more electricity: what happens? There is so much electricity produced, that there is too much electricity, and what happens to the price of electricity? You pay the price of having your money spent on electricity but you get some of that money back because the price of electricity goes down, there is too much of it, and what does too much electricity look like? 1. Too many chairs look like a pyramid of too may chairs, all the excess is stored in one pile. 2. Too many aggressive wars for profit generate piles of dead bodies, and I can link the pictures if you have no clue about how that works. 3. What does too many kilowatt/hours of electricity look like when that is what Ben orders when Ben doubles the money supply and gives that money to the people on his list, and Ben want's more electricity? How do you store too much electricity? If aluminum cans are made, that is one way to store electricity. If salt water is pumped out of the ocean and pumped inland to higher elevations, that is a way to store electricity, because water can then be allowed to flow back down, and the water can be used to turn electric generating turbines. How many chairs can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? How many aggressive wars for profit can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? How many kilowatt/hours of electricity can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? Even if the electricity was produced so as to ground the power into the Earth, making electricity to waste it, the things that had to be made to make more electricity would be made, and once Ben and his crew were done with those things, they would be left laying around for someone else to use, and use productively. That is not the case with too may chairs. That is not the case with too many aggressive wars for profit (the supreme crime man has ever invented upon mankind, so far); but Ben can loan money to other borrowers who get no bid contracts to rebuild what they destroy. That is not the case with any form of productive power, such as electricity. Joe's Law: Power produced into a state of oversupply decreases the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 15th, 2011 04:56 pm |
|
57th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Where did Peak Oil go?
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Sep 28th, 2011 10:40 am |
|
58th Post |
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, Here is a link: http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/electric-cars-a-bad-idea-whose-time-has-come/?eiid=&rmid=2011_09_28_PLA_[P11167147]&rrid=395224738 More and more I find evidence of a campaign by which solar panels and electric cars are being demonized, as if those things are bad. Those things are sources of independent power. So long as a Solar Panel continues to cost the user less than the cost of the power that the Solar Panel produces so long will the Solar Panel be a competitive independent power. Which investments work better than a Solar Panel, what is the return on investment of a Solar Panel? The cost of the investment is the price of the Solar Panel. If a person buys new, from a vendor, the buyer pays for a lot of extra costs compared to a person buying parts, and assembling those parts. If the cost of buying a Solar Panel is less than the cost of paying for all the electricity produced by the Solar Panel what is that difference in power spent and power consumed? I've read that a Solar Panel bought today can conceivably be paid off in 5 years as the cost of electricity produced adds up to the same amount as the price of the Solar Panel. In other words. You pay 1000 dollars for the Solar Panel. 5 years go by and you produce 1000 dollars worth of electricity with the Solar Panel. What happens if the Solar Panel still produces 1000 dollars worth of electricity for 20 more years; since they have been guaranteed to produce for 25 years? These are very rough mathematical illustrations of the general point; and the general answer is easy to see. In 5 years the Solar Panel pays for itself. The Solar Panel keeps paying out for 20 more years. Compared to a savings account where the money saved is paying out 3% while inflation is 6% is a net loss of 3%. Compared to a savings account the Solar Panel is a net gain of 100% after 10 years. 200% after 15 years. 300% after 20 years. 400% at the end of the projected life span (depreciation) of the investment. Where does that report where the reporter demonizes Solar Panels get off? Electric Cars are currently manufactured in American by Tesla Motors. Tesla Motors is a viable business despite the huge amounts of subsidies flowing to the competition in the non-competitive automobile market. It is non-competitive because of the subsidies flowing to the "socialist" (and I use that term loosely) automakers. Where does that reporter get off? Electricity is a power source, and independent people can now sell electricity by law, and in so doing an individual person competes with any competitor including the heavily subsidized "socialist" power companies. Where does that reporter get off? What is his problem? I think he is being paid to tell lies. You can think whatever is in your power to think. Good luck.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 01:39 pm | Page: 1 2 3 |
| Power Independence > Power Independence > Discovery > Joe's Law | Top |
