Joe's Law - Discovery - Power Independence

Home

Not logged in - Login | Register

Power Independence > Power Independence > Discovery > Joe's Law

Moderated by: Joe Kelley

Page: 1 2 3

New Topic

Printer Friendly

Joe's Law

Rating:

Author	Post

Posted: Sat Oct 18th, 2008 01:26 pm

Quote

21^st Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

quote:

"The New Kleptocracy"
"The largest financial theft in American history"

Must Listen Interview - - By Guns & Butter

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21041.htm

Listen to that and then see this:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10066974-54.html

quote:

Sempra Energy, which builds and operates natural gas power plants, plans to invest billions in solar power plants in the coming years and expects to get about the same 10 percent return on the capital it typically gets, said Michael Allman, president and CEO of Sempra Generation. Because of the credit crunch, other firms may have a harder time than Sempra launching large projects, he said.

And this:

http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/future-tech/new-solar-tech-is-over-the-rainbow-476208

quote:

Hybrid panels will boost efficiency and power

Out with the old (legal criminals) and in with the new (independent power).

Like this:

http://www.groundreport.com/Arts_and_Culture/Demand-Honest-Currency

Here:

http://gas2.org/2008/10/16/chinese-company-unveils-solar-powered-car-for-5560/

quote:

Chinese Company Unveils Solar-Powered Car for $5,560

Here:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/10/solar-power-satellite.php

quote:

The obvious benefit: a continuous 24-hour, 365-day supply of solar energy. Powered by solar energy itself, a single SPS could generate up to 10 gigawatts of power continually, according to Bova. If that's even remotely true, just imagine how much continuous power a group of these SPSs could provide.

The solar power satellite: a costly proposition
Things get a bit trickier when Bova delves into some of the cost issues. For instance, he says that an SPS could deliver electricity at a cost of only about 8 - 10 cents per kilowatt hour, which would make it very competitive with conventional power sources. He does recognize that the upfront costs -- both to build the satellite ($1 billion apiece) and to launch it (see: SpaceX launches) -- would be fairly substantial; launching it into space successfully would be a whole other story.

Over time, as economies of scale take hold and component prices drop, the scheme would begin to look much more appealing. How long that will take, though, is anybody's guess. We have the technologies in place -- solar, satellite and microwave -- but putting everything together (and making sure it all works) will be a tremendous challenge.

And back to the old stuff here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking

quote:

Wall Street banks in $70bn staff payoutPay and bonus deals equivalent to 10% of US government bail-out package

Quote

Posted: Sun Oct 19th, 2008 01:06 pm

Quote

22^nd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/422.html

Survival of the fittest was not Darwin's discovery.

See:

Herbert Spencer

http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/spencer.htm

Why do people believe in falsehood?

Quote

Posted: Sun Oct 19th, 2008 02:35 pm

Quote

23^rd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article4965242.ece

Leaders in Tehran, Moscow and Caracas have gloated as the financial crisis has hobbled the United States and its Western allies. Analysts say that the three swaggering petro-states are the most vulnerable oil producers to the steep price declines. From a record high of $147 (£85) a barrel in July, crude oil is now trading at around $70 after dipping to its lowest level since August 2007.

Deutsche Bank estimated in a recent research note that Iran and Venezuela need an oil price of more than $95 a barrel to balance their budgets, and Russia requires a price of $75. That compares to a break-even figure of $55 for Saudi Arabia.

Iran and Venezuela have led so-called oil hawks in recent days to push the producer cartel Opec to bring forward an emergency meeting to next Friday, from mid-November, to discuss cutting output quotas to drive up the price. While Russia has prudently salted away much of its oil windfall in “rainy day” funds, Iran and Venezuela are much worse prepared for the downturn, Mr Elkind said.

The tumbling oil prices are grim news for President Ahmadinejad of Iran as he prepares to fight for re-election next June. The populist son of a blacksmith won a landslide election victory three years ago by pledging to give the poor a fairer share of Iran's oil wealth. Now the economy is his Achilles' heel. His profligate spending of petrodollars from record oil revenues has stoked inflation, which topped 29 per cent last month, compared with 12 per cent when he took power.

Does anyone else find the above data to be somewhat innacurate?

Look here:

http://www.allbusiness.com/north-america/united-states-alaska/923787-1.html

Alaska's North Slope is a relatively high-cost oil producing region, which puts it at certain disadvantages. Cambridge Energy Research Asso ciates, the Cambridge, Mass., consulting firm, has ranked Alaska 15th among 26 for investment potential among current or emerging oil producing regions of the world.

Alaska's average full-cycle cost of producing North Slope oil and moving it to the nearest market, the U.S. West Coast , is about $9.70 to $10 per barrel, according to CERA. This compares with a U.S. average onshore cost of production and transportation to market of $8.10/barrel and a cost in Western Canada (i.e., Alberta) of $9.25/barrel, and a world average cost of $8/barrel.

And here:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DXP/is_/ai_n14923269

Detailed statistics tables: imports of crude oil and petroleum products: PAD products

More data:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCZC4GTEPkg&feature=related

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=david+blume+oil+price&emb=0&aq=f#

Quote

Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 03:13 am

Quote

24^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/

The first stages of the project include investing in British companies involved in promising algae research.

“You can make algae with a very high oil content and you can make algae that grows very quickly and, at the moment, no one can do both,” said Robert Trezona, R&D director at the Carbon Trust.

It will take a multitude of approaches to fully realize the potential of algae. “There are many more different algae species than there are higher plant species so each algae will require specific effort. Each one will have its own peculiar requirements to figure out how to make them productive, how to get the right strains, how to harvest and process them. We cannot just depend on one or two companies.”

Quote

Posted: Sat Oct 25th, 2008 07:59 am

Quote

25^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,586315,00.html

Dozens of world leaders are gathered in Beijing for the Asia-Europe summit this week. The question on everyone's mind is: Will China cooperate in facing down the global financial crisis?

Anyone,

One of my fictional works (a small essay) has been published here:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1117819/helium3.html?cat=44

The Chinese took over space early in the 21 century because their leadership had invested for the long haul. That long haul brought Helium-3 to China from the moon. Having deftly defending against The West's Imperial Crimes of Aggression, by playing the money game better and forcing The West to withdrawal from Iraq, and the boarder of Iran, the Chinese gained control of Global Oil and Credit. The power taken from The Dollar Hegemony fueled the Chinese effort to mine the new energy source from the moon: Helium-3. The last great leaders of The West: The NeoCons had ruined the American economy during their criminal reign of terror. Once the flow of political power transferred and once Helium-3 entered the Chinese economy the Chinese never looked back. There was no longer any need for the tortured and false history polluted into being by the twisted minds of the Western Legal Criminals, their power evaporated in the Big Dollar Crash that led to the new age of prosperity for all who commanded the wisdom to join in Human Power Independence. Oil, Dollars, and the Major Media Falsehood Factories were out, like an old shoe, and the new age of accurate reason commenced. The Helium age erupted with brilliance never before seen in human time.

Quote

Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 01:39 pm

Quote

26^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/25/mit-energy-storage-discovery-could-lead-to-unlimited-solar-power/

Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have discovered a new way of storing energy from sunlight that could lead to ‘unlimited’ solar power.

The process, loosely based on plant photosynthesis, uses solar energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. When needed, the gases can then be re-combined in a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity whether the sun is shining or not.

According to project leader Prof. Daniel Nocera, “This is the nirvana of what we’ve been talking about for years. Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now, we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon.”

Nocera has also explained that the process (video) uses natural materials, is inexpensive to conduct and is easy to set up. “That’s why I know this is going to work. It’s so easy to implement,” he said.

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 1st, 2008 10:54 am

Quote

27^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/27/renewableenergy-energy

Batteries still need to become cheaper and quicker to charge, but the UK's largest manufacturer of electric vehicles says that advances are happening faster than ever before. Its urban delivery van has a range of over 100 miles, accelerates to 70mph and has running costs of just over 1p per mile. The cost of the diesel equivalent is probably 20 times as much. Denmark and Israel have committed to develop the full infrastructure for a switch to an all-electric car fleet. Danish cars will be powered by the spare electricity from the copious resources of wind power; the Israelis will provide solar power harvested from the desert.

Quote

Posted: Mon Dec 22nd, 2008 11:12 am

Quote

28^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://sitekreator.com/dmoney/index.html

The idea behind government is simple: Citizens grant special power to certain individuals so that those individuals can serve and protect society. Citizens DO NOT grant special power to certain individuals so those individuals can serve (and protect) themselves at the expense of society. –And yet we see this happen over and over again. (Criminals infiltrate government, pervert its purpose and use its power against the people.)

Quote

Posted: Tue Feb 24th, 2009 10:47 am

Quote

29^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22075.htm

Taking the US as the example, the following course of action would seem prudent:

Pass legislation to safeguard all home owners against foreclosure and eviction on the grounds that human rights take precedence over all other concerns.

Introduce a “new” US dollar as a strictly national currency, not tied to any exchange rate mechanism other than to the “old” US dollar, with limitations.

Issue it from the Treasury, ignoring the Fed and existing banks, which can fend for themselves with the currency they have rendered worthless. Issue the new currency through state and local banks all under the direction of the US Treasury in the form of long-term interest free loans.

Issue loans to individuals and institutions producing essential goods and services (food, medicine, energy, etc) as a priority to stave of any humanitarian crisis. Where needed allow repayment in the forms of goods and services under federal and state programs for food, energy and medical aid.

Extend loans to individuals and institutions investing in green technology and to existing enterprises which are seeking to modernize and shift to the production of essential commodities.

Use the currency to invest directly into large scale infrastructure projects across the country on a scale sufficient to begin job creation on a level that will visibly turn around and then increase employment figures.

Make the new currency legal tender for the payment of debts and mortgages held in old currency at an exchange rate that realistically reflects fair value. This will force a transition and shift in property value without creating negative equity. Say for arguments sake one new to ten old. Private banks will clamour for new currency as it is the only one worth anything.

Legislate to ensure private banks in possession of new currency are barred from lending it under a fractional reserve system and cap interest rates on it’s lending to the public.

In proportion to an increase in domestic production, allow foreign holders of old dollar reserves to exchange them for new at the fixed rates of exchange and in limited quantities to guard against a resurrection of the US dollar becoming an instrument of international finance. Limit the amount of currency allowed to exist outside the US, ensuring the national economy can match the value existing with production capacity.

Last edited on Tue Feb 24th, 2009 10:59 am by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 08:42 am

Quote

30^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.mint.com/blog/finance-core/china-vs-united-states-a-visual-comparison/

Quote

Posted: Thu May 7th, 2009 10:10 am

Quote

31^st Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

Harvest Green: Vertical Farm by Romses Architects wins Competition

Quote

Posted: Sun May 10th, 2009 01:09 pm

Quote

32^nd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/tal1-o24.shtml

In the mid-1990s, the US attitude to the Taliban was not determined by bin Laden, drugs or democratic rights. If US official Robin Raphel was ambivalent about officially embracing the Taliban in mid-1996, it was because Washington was uncertain whether Taliban fighters were capable of defeating their opponents and providing a stable political climate for the Unocal project.

If one were to believe the Bush administration and the international media, the sole purpose of Washington’s extensive and costly war against one of the world’s most backward countries is to catch bin Laden and to break up his Al Qaeda network. But as this historical review demonstrates, Washington’s objectives in Afghanistan are not determined by fears about terrorism or concerns over human rights. The US has for the first time established a military presence in the Central Asian republics with troops in Uzbekistan and its military campaign ensures that it will dictate the terms for any post-Taliban regime in Afghanistan. Even if bin Laden were killed tomorrow and his organisation destroyed, Washington has no intention of retreating from these first steps towards the domination of this key strategic region and its vast energy reserves.

Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

Why use the word "energy" when the more accurate word is: POWER?

Last edited on Sun May 10th, 2009 01:18 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Fri Jun 5th, 2009 12:27 pm

Quote

33^rd Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=anvHhN4CqQOE

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/china-india-go-with-the-wind-as-fossils-dwindle-20090604-bx8r.html

Power-Independence

Quote

Posted: Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 11:00 am

Quote

34^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-07/mf_freer

Tech Is Too Cheap to Meter: It's Time to Manage for Abundance, Not Scarcity

The underlying products can be free to almost everybody because the underlying costs are asymptotically approaching zero.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/asymptotically

A line whose distance to a given curve tends to zero. An asymptote may or may not intersect its associated curve

Joe’s Law:

Power produced into a state of over-supply (abundance) reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production (asymptotically).

Question:

Who defines economy as "Choice under scarcity"

Answer:

Not me.

Economy is the science of producing more than consumption. I think the "choice under scarcity" definition is false on purpose and false from the "capitalist" doctrine which can be traced back to at least Carl Menger who wrote:

“every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others.” Carl Menger (1840 -1921)

To falsify the meaning of economy in this manner, it seems to me, is akin to falsifying Darwinism to mean "the survival of the fittest" as the same thing as "Kill or be killed"; when the true meaning is that the "fittest" are the ones best able to cooperate voluntarily, to reproduce, to nurture, to produce more than consumption.

See this?

The obsession with "saving" and "interest rates must be high" etc. is part of the capitalist dogma that fails to see the truth of economy (to produce more than consumption).

If you listen to the video in the link at the top of the page you can begin to see Joe's Law as a more accurate perspective on economy. Abundance is the natural result of economy, not a managed scarcity.

A managed scarcity can be exemplified with typical capitalist dogma. For example: a price can be increased when production is throttled down to cause the product to be scarce on purpose. That is a natural result of capitalist dogma, to make things scarce on purpose, to manage scarcity on purpose, for profit. The sick part of this false dogma is its inherent short term gains at the expense of long term benefits; particularly when capitalist dogma is employed in the production of power, into a state of scarcity, such as the production of oil, for one example, or food, for another example, so as to profit by that managed scarcity as that managed scarcity increases demand and increases profits where wealth flows from the those who need oil and food to those who manage that scarcity with their capitalist methods of false dogma.

Words are not deeds, don't blame me for scarce food supplies and scarce power supplies, I'm the guy who found Joe's Law - remember?

Power produced into a state of oversupply (abundance) reduces the price of power (asymptotically) while purchasing power (money purchasing power) increases because power reduces the cost of production (asymptotically).

Last edited on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 12:20 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 12:12 pm

Quote

35^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://tinyurl.com/njbjse

Wired Editor-in-Chief Chris Anderson on the Future of Free

Not so fast dude. Please, dear reader, consider the following quote from the link above and then please consider learning from history so as not to repeat the major errors. I'll explain after the quote:

Back in the late 1800s there was some theorizing…this was at the dawn of economics.

Economics, dear reader, began with human thought. What the speaker above is referring to is "capitalism", and you can hear how his error is confessed as you listen to the speech.

When a person considers waking up or staying in bed, a modern bed or a bed made of animal fur in the Stone Age, the economy of the decision is thought out by the human being.

I’m concerned about placing credit where credit is due, and I ‘m concerned about accurate transfers of data. Please know that the speaker, although his message is full of accurate data, please know that he is mistaking the social science of economy with “capitalism”.

Capitalism is the management of scarcity and capitalism is a pricing scheme where the price is purposefully “pegged” at “that which the market will bear”, so please, dear reader, do not make the same mistake as the speaker. Please don’t perpetuation this myth.

Economy is not “capitalism”.  Capitalism is not economy.

Here are two economic studies that pre-date “the dawn of economics”, and the first is more than merely talk, as the inventor of this earlier economic study also proved his “theory” with real time experimentation.

http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf

That is Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren

The date of that publication is 1952. Josiah Warren describes the inherent stupidity of the capitalist pricing scheme, as a short term small gain for a few “capitalist” at the expense of a larger long term loss for everyone including the few “capitalists”.

Words are not deeds, and again Josiah Warren proved his “theory” on economy with deeds.

Next up is a proponent of Josiah Warren’s economic study and practices where Stephen Pearl Andrews re-writes and expands upon “Equitable Commerce” with his version called: “The Science of Society”.

http://anarchism.net/scienceofsociety.htm

So, for the record, the economic study that has dawned in the late 1800s was and continues to be “Capitalism” which is a failed economic model of “choice under scarcity” where the pricing choice is to price based upon “that which the market will bear”.

That is and was “capitalism”.

“Choice under scarcity”
Price based upon “that which the market will bear”.

If the reader takes the time to read either or both “Equitable Commerce” and “The Science of Society” the reader will discover an alternative to “Capitalism” and that alternative not only pre-dates formal “Capitalism” it (Equitable Commerce) describes the modern social and economic model being described by the speaker (Chris Anderson).

Please do not follow the model of mistaken identity where the “founders” of economics are falsely identified as those early capitalists like Carl Menger who wrote this:

“every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others.” Carl Menger (1840 -1921)

I like this better:

"Responsibility must be Individual, or there is no responsibility at all." Josiah Warren (1852)

This is also worth considering:

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance."
George Bernard Shaw

Last edited on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 12:15 pm by Joe Kelley

Quote

Posted: Sat Jul 18th, 2009 11:14 am

Quote

36^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2009/06/thermodynamic-economy.html

Only a few economists at the time, and even fewer since then, realized that these perplexities pointed to weaknesses in the most basic assumptions of economics itself. E.F. Schumacher was one of these. He pointed out that for a modern industrial society, energy resources are not simply one set of commodities among many others. They are the ur-commodities, the fundamental resources that make economic activity possible at all, and the rules that govern the behavior of other commodities cannot be applied to energy resources in a simplistic fashion. Commented Schumacher in Small is Beautiful:

“I have already alluded to the energy problem in some of the other chapters. It is impossible to get away from it. It is impossible to overemphasize its centrality. [...] As long as there is enough primary energy – at tolerable prices – there is no reason to believe that bottlenecks in any other primary materials cannot be either broken or circumvented. On the other hand, a shortage of primary energy would mean that the demand for most other primary products would be so curtailed that a question of shortage with regard to them would be unlikely to arise” (p. 123).

Put another way:

Power produced into a state of oversupply decreases the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

Quote

Posted: Thu Aug 27th, 2009 09:49 am

Quote

37^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://lewrockwell.com/schmidt/schmidt18.1.html

The greatest product of oil, however, is wealth. As J. Paul Getty advised: "Formula for success: rise early, work hard, strike oil." This wealth is due to the phenomenal returns from oil, known as EROEI, energy return on energy invested. Unlike coal, which had to be physically lifted from the ground, oil often flowed to the surface under pressure. Returns of over 100 times the energy invested to drill a well were not uncommon in the early days of oil exploration.

It is this bonanza of essentially unearned natural wealth that has formed the basis of much of the 20^th-century improvement in human living conditions. Cheap oil forms the basis of the current US food production chain and any number of other systems: "Crude oil has been critical for economic development and the smooth functioning of almost every aspect of society. Agriculture and food production is heavily dependent on oil for fuel and fertilisers. In the US, for instance, it takes the direct and indirect use of about six barrels of oil to raise one beef steer. It is the basis of most transport systems. Oil is also crucial to the drugs and chemicals industries and is a strategic asset for the military." (emphasis added)

Quote

Posted: Fri Aug 28th, 2009 09:08 am

Quote

38^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.mint.com/blog/trends/how-money-finds-its-way-into-the-economy/

When these inter-bank lending rates are too low, many argue, money becomes too easily available and creates economic bubbles.

That is bull...shit.

Interest charged by someone who pays no interest is an easy to explain abuse of power, it is crime, it is legal crime.

These are words, these are words that have no power, people have power.

Some people, call them "The Fed", have the power to add zeros to their own personal accounts.

If you believe the words published on that OHHHH SOOOO official looking link, and you prefer not to believe that sentence above, then please take a moment and look in the mirror and ask yourself this question:

"When will I take back my power to perceive accurately from those who stole that power?"

Here is the sentence again (that you may or may not believe to be true, while you may or may not believe the bullshit published in the link to be true):

Some people, call them "The Fed", have the power to add zeros to their own personal accounts.

Suppose that you went into the bathroom and you asked yourself the question concerning your power to see clearly and then suppose that you decided to use your brain to see what may be true in that sentence I offer to you.

Suppose that these people, call them The Fed, add millions of zeros to their personal accounts, millions of zeros, because the keyboard stuck, or some other excuse.

They now have a lot of zeros in their account no?

Yes?

When is one zero too many zeros?

When is the number of zeros not enough zeros in their personal accounts?

What do they want?

What do they want to buy?

They already have the power to add zeros to their personal accounts so they don't have to buy that power from someone. It is already their power, and it is not your power, not legally your power.

What happens if you want to add zeros to your account?

You have to pay them.

They don't have to pay you.

Why do you not have that deal?

Why do they have that deal and not you?

What makes them so special?

I have the accurate answer.

They are criminals.

You are a victim.

If you refuse to see things in that way, then you work for them - without pay.

Good luck with that, it leads to torture and mass murder as those people buy what they need to keep that power.

You may end up pushing less powerful people in front of you on the line to the torture chambers on that path.

You may end up digging the mass graves.

You may end up being tortured as you torture other people, being murdered as you murder other people and if you think I'm the one "on crack", then ask yourself what happens to your wealth when your zeros on your account are transfered to a government employee who is at this moment torturing someone for profit.

You bought it, hook, line, and sinker.

Quote

Posted: Mon Sep 28th, 2009 01:00 pm

Quote

39^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

I have been on another forum where the forum operators allow personal attacks to continue despite polite requests made by the targeted victim, me, to stop.

Here is that forum:

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=2329

Anyone interested in reading the data linked must register. That is the way it goes.

Having suffered though much of the personal attacks, and having persisted in defense, and having continued to offer data at the site, it has come to a point, now, where I see the need to expand my coverage from that exclusive site to other places, like this site, my site.

Here the moderator is me, I can take any action requested by any fellow forum member into consideration and act or not act accordingly, and I can explain my actions, and I an fall back on previous pre-emptive declarations concerning what I intend to do with people who attack fellow forum members with their pre-meditated personal attacks.

The subject matter, here and now, the data, the incoming information, the stuff that will be processed, commented on, understood, questioned, perceived, and digested includes Power and Independence and it includes a filter by which the data will be seen through, and that filter is Joe’s law (and equitable commerce).

The first source of data is a web link here:

http://www.alternet.org/world/139983/pipeline-istan:_everything_you_need_to_know_about_oil,_gas,_russia,_china,_iran,_afghanistan_and_obama/

Here is the tinyurl link:

http://tinyurl.com/ydphosk

Here is the title:

Pipeline-Istan: Everything You Need to Know About Oil, Gas, Russia, China, Iran, Afghanistan and Obama

Here is a relevant quote:

Now, it's time to grasp just what the Asian Energy Security Grid is all about, visit a surreal natural gas republic, and understand why that Grid is so deeply implicated in the Af-Pak war.

The idea here, now, is to make sense of the current events that may lead the human species toward or away from extinction. In order to understand what I mean by that last warning, that last opportunity, that last sentence I see the need to link another data stream.

Here:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/09/asteroid-impacts-are-the-biggest-threat-to-advanced-life-in-the-galaxy-stephen-hawking.html

Here is the Tinyurl:

http://tinyurl.com/y9y696x

Here is the title:

"Asteroid Impacts are the Biggest Threat to Advanced Life in the Milky Way" -Stephen Hawking (The Weekend Feature)

Here is a quote:

Through Earth's history such collisions occur, on the average every one million year. If this figure is correct, it would mean that intelligent life on Earth has developed only because of the lucky chance that there have been no major collisions in the last 70 million years.

Here, and now, it is my opportunity to connect the dots. If the power that is available to the human species is consumed by legal criminals who are hell bent on “eliminating the competition” (their true motive), then less power is consumed in the process of insuring or ensuring the survival of the species against the number one threat (or perhaps legal crime is the true number one threat).

I have personal power; but my person power must now be spent ensuring my own survival, so this side job must be put off. Please consider reading both links and connect the dots if you can, it may be a good thing to do, you will have to be the judge, such is the nature of our species – we are individual examples.

Quote

Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 12:51 pm

Quote

40^th Post

Joe Kelley
Administrator

Joined:	Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location:	California USA
Posts:	6399
Status:	Offline
Mana:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/722.html#I

It doesn't work if everyone is in on it.

Quote

Current time is 02:31 pm	Page: 1 2 3
Power Independence > Power Independence > Discovery > Joe's Law	Top