 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Why a growing grassroots movement on the left wants to impeach the president -- and why Democrats in Washington don't even want to talk about it.
By Drake Bennett | June 24, 2007
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prejudice
an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.
That is the "P" word.
Back to the "I" word News item is found:
The only impeachment resolution currently before Congress, introduced by Ohio Congressman and presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich this spring, is directed solely at Cheney, and when asked, Kucinich refuses to say whether he'd support impeaching Bush. "I'm pretty much staying focused on the effort to impeach the Vice President," he says.
How many are needed?
The Kucinch tactic is to begin impeachment proceedings which 'discover' facts including any 'facts' that implicate crimes commited by the President. How can that not work to, at least, slow down the torture and mass murdering going on while financing these crimes with 'our' wealth?
See how that works? The weath created by innocent American people who have no time to spend 'governing' the National Government, that wealth, is stolen from those People who have to work harder just to make ends meet because that wealth is stolen, AND, that wealth is being spent, NOW, on torture and mass murder, so, slowing that rate of wealth being spent on torture and mass murder can accomplish at least three things.
A. Less innocent people being tortured.
B. Less people being murders
C. More wealth in the hands of Americans so they can GOVERN the National Government.
Meanwhile the American people have to depend upon a handful of REPRESENTATIVES who do have the POWER to accomplish A, B, and C.
Is that too simple?
Last edited on Sun Jun 24th, 2007 06:06 pm by Joe Kelley