 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Individuals may commit a crime. Individuals may be currently committing a crime. Individuals may have committed a crime.
Who in America decides what is or is not a crime?
If the "government" arms an individual is that a crime?
If the "government" disarms an individual is that a crime?
If an individual arms an individual is that a crime?
If an individual disarms an individual is that a crime?
Did the "government" give anyone a right to defend themselves?
If a gun, or a government, is used to perpetrate a crime, is it reasonable to conclude that the gun, or the government, is guilty of the crime?
Who decides if someone is guilty of any crime, anywhere, anytime, according to common laws of free people in liberty?
Who decides if someone is guilty of any crime, anywhere, anytime, according to cult members who blindly follow obediently any order dictated by a legal fiction?
“...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Which individuals are guilty of the crime of infringing the right to keep and bear arms, if in fact doing so has been determined lawfully as a crime?
“It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue.”
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236 (1788)
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
February Sessions, 1788