 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
JUST-US in America has been what it still is since 1789.
They (so-called government) judge what they do according to their lapses of conscience, and they are the only ones they afford that power: ever.
They (again so-called government) judge what we (everyone other than so-called government) do according to the same lapses of their twisted consciences.
They (same cult members in so-called government) punish whosoever dares to oppose their power with regular severity, including “execution” (murder) for the "crime" (duty) of telling the truth about them.
If they (the cult members) can get away with murder, serial murder, conspiracy murder, mass murder, aggressive war for profit, torture, mass torture, slavery, central banking fraud, and worse crimes, regularly, routinely, for over 200 years, then who has this idea that now they are going to police themselves with something remotely resembling moral conscience?
Natural laws apply to those cult members too. They (the cult members that constitute fake government) routinely stab each other in the back while smiling at each other, or they hire a backstabber or two, or a gang of them ready to pounce on the side of the road, or in the middle of the road after a blind turn. They will wipe each other out internally and externally someday, but not before consuming posterity.
So what is the idea here in this effort to discuss or communicate the events involving the two-sided coin known by so many terms, such as Electoral Politics, or the Two-Party System?
Will they hold each other to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter in any case whatsoever? Will that process proceed according to the law of the land: the common law?
Team A authorizes an individual (or a gang of cult members) to serve an individual in Team B with a friendly official notice of legal action. Then what?
How about some specifics?
One of the Team B members, Barry, or a Clinton, is officially notified of impending legal action. Perhaps Team A entrusts this Unitary Executive Barr dude as the point man. All is fair right?
Team A informs Team B of the conflict of interest, a legal matter, a criminal legal matter to be precise, a matter of interest to the public at large in fact. At least one member of Team A informs at least one member of Team B that there will be an accurate accounting of the facts that matter in a very serious criminal case involving that accused member of Team B. If the accusation is false, then the term used is ignoramus. If the accusation is false, then in a word the accuser is risking that label accounted to the false accuser: ignoramous.
Does the matter then involve at least one affidavit to put the accuser on the spot: no fingers crossed? Does the accuser seek a county grand jury to judge the validity of the accusation, grand jurors trusted to do so without team affiliation of any kind, other than the fact that their duty is to protect and serve everyone within the set of people known as the Public? Are those members of that county grand jury then afforded all necessary power (jurisdiction) civil and criminal, and thereby capable of issuing a presentment to be served to the accused with the court date? Let the trial of the Millennium begin!
That is not how it is done in America. It is not done according to the actual law of the land. But there is hope, right? This one time it will proceed according to common laws of free people in a perishable state of liberty?
Will the accused be deemed guilty first? Will there be a demand for the guilty to prove innocence, after the guilty is run down, assaulted, kidnapped, tortured, and extorted into a so-called “plea-bargain?” Will it be business as usual for cult members and their fodder alike?
No, unless a Black Swan shows up, things will proceed according to the plans used by those cult members when cult members deal with fellow cult members. Things will not proceed according to the methods used by cult members upon non-cult members. Things will not proceed according to any semblance of lawful (moral) order. There won’t be an official act intending to uncover the facts that matter in the case regardless of Party affiliation. The Public will not be represented according to the common laws of free people. The process will not proceed according to lawful order as documented in such examples as a Declaration of Independence and a Bill of Rights.
7: Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
3: The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Article the seventh... No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Article the eighth... In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Article the ninth... In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Article the tenth... Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.