| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Sep 18th, 2018 03:19 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
"What they did not have in their day was some means of setting things right in their relations to a Govt gone rogue, that is, short of war. " The common law was the means by which the revolutionary forces dealt with the criminally aggressive British. The Declaration of Independence was a simple common law notice of mixed war. To claim that "our" founders were all on the same page, and they were outlaws is patently false. "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: "That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: "That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:" That is as true now as it was when it was entered into the official record of the First Congress of the forming United States (plural) of America. That above, as well as the Declaration of Independence, describes the crime of mixed war. To claim that the victims are the outlaws is a ruse, why do people fall into that clap trap? "When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen of all of his remedies by the due process of law and deprives the citizen of the equal protection of the law, the state commits an act of mixed war against the citizen, and, by its behavior, the state declares war on the citizen. The citizen has the right to recognize this act by the publication of a solemn recognition of mixed war. This writing has the same force as the Declaration of Independence. It invokes the citizen's U.S. constitutional 9th and 10th so-called amend guarantees of the right to create an effective remedy where otherwise none exists." http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/work-in-progress/bonding-code.htm "In American history, the Declaration of Independence served the legal purpose of making a Solemn Recognition of Mixed War, which is a Notice of Military Lien Right, a warning of No Trespass, an assertion that any killing or taking of human life necessary for the protection of the legal remedies of the common citizen is being done, in the immediate situation described in the Solemn Recognition or Notice, not as murder, but as lethal self-defense of the commercial and social remedy against the cited domestic enemy or enemies. The Declaration of Independence is the legal model or format for the construction of the Solemn Recognition of Mixed War and the Notice of Military Lien Right." http://sicknesshope.com/node/2033
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||