| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Feb 28th, 2018 05:31 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
Boyd White points out the fundamental fact of the matter when criminals counterfeit democratic republics formed into a federation under rule of law. Criminals replace "we the people" united in liberty with a divided "us and them" war zone. Rather than a whole group of people existing within the boarders of a federation all acting as one to redeem, restore, and to deter crime with accurate accounting of the facts: the criminal element seeps in, like a cancer, and replacing redemption of the soul, and restoration of damage done by criminals charged to the individual criminals, the criminal virus works to blame every-one and no-one all at the same time, collectively punishing everyone for the crimes actually perpetrated by the criminals, and said criminals are never held to an accurate accounting: instead they are perpetually hidden behind their well maintained fake badges. The group that enforces "their" decisions, when "their" numbers are the common law grand juries of non-BAR member people, investigating crimes perpetrated by criminals with fake badges, is the whole people as one, that is the enforcing group: we the people. We the people are represented by 12 randomly selected petty jury members, with each individual juror representing 1/12 part of the whole people, who then determine guilt based upon fact, and whose historical job was also to fix the sentence: seek remedy, and restoration. When the whole people rule, not divisions of the whole set at each other's throats, it is democracy: not majority rule. Democracy is rule by the people themselves, not one group ruling another of various sizes. When it is a republic it is the public thing. The public is the people as a whole. When it is a federation, at least according to the first congress of the actual American federation as the federation was forming from grass roots organically, then a federation is a voluntary association. The first Congress of delegates: That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn: Mixed war is a crime perpetrated by fake government agents, and it is known by the whole people who constitute the common law; or not.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||