View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Thu Jan 25th, 2018 09:42 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Libel Exhibit A:

"Spooner goes above and beyond to misconstrue the facts of the creation of the Constitution; there is no excuse for that since Spooner published “No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority” in 1867..."

The above is hyperbole and ad-hominem. The libeler may have failed to actually understand the work of Lysander Spooner, and rather than find out who is actually guilty of misconstruing the readily available information, said libeler goes on the attack, whereby the victim of the attack is claimed to be failing an intelligence test of some kind, a test offered by the libeler after the target of the libeler has already been in the grave for over a century.

Then said libeler goes from ad-hominem to hyperbole with the additional false claim that his victim had "no excuse" for the fake crime of misconstruing an intelligence test offered to the victim by the victimizer over 100 years after the death of the victim.

The tester (libeler) offering the test to the victim (Lysander Spooner) apparently assumes dictatorial powers as judge, jury, and executioner concerning what is, or is not, a lawful document: such as in this case a contract, or "Constitution."

The actual jury is still out on this, so the law of the land, which is trial by the country, has yet to try the case. None-the-less, said libeler speaks for someone, or some group, with an air, or a color, of authority.

Apparently the libeler has claimed - in so many ambiguous words - that the target of the libel is guilty of misconstruing the Slave Trading Constitution with a "contract." Proof of this crime of "misconstruing," according to the libeler is that those Slave Traders who didn't want the Pro-Slave Trading Constitution signed, were against signing it, or some other reason.

Example:

Mr. Govr. MORRIS “…He remarked that the signing in the form proposed related only to the fact that the States present were unanimous.”

Again, in defense of actual law, and in defense against further deception, the confession exists in that quote. All the States were not represented during the closed, secret, gag orders issued, conspiracy to throw out the voluntary mutual defense association - federation - and replace it with a slave trading, central banking fraud, war mongering, Nation State, and since all the States were not present the said Pro-Slavery Constitution was null and void as it sat without signatures, or with signatures.

Signing the Pro-Slavery Constitution - as a matter of fact - identifies the conspirators for their conspiracy. George Mason refused to sign it.

George Mason:

"Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union."


George Mason:

"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions {442} should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"

As to the actual crime perpetrated - on the official record no less - by the Slave Traders, War Mongers, Central Banking Frauds, and others in the first "Convention:"

“Every state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this confederation shall be inviolably observed by every state, and the union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a congress of the united states, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every state.”

One of the most important requirements demanded by those representatives in most of the states was that their consent was as powerful as the consent of any other state. Rhode Island refused to attend the conspiracy, on many grounds, and therefore the crime here is that all the other representatives in the other 12 states who signed the Pro-Slave Trading document were willfully perpetrating a crime against the will of those who agreed to form the original, grass-roots, organic federation on that specific, demanded, condition of equal protection under the law: consent.

If the libeler misconstrues this fact, unknowingly, out of ignorance, that is one thing. If the libeler knows this fact, and attempts to further deceive other people, then that is all together different. The responsibility of knowing better is born by each individual.