 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
"Changing the US Constitution? Not On My Watch!"
Where were you in 1789 when the criminal slave traders changed the federal constitution?
The law of the land was, and is, the common law: NOT the National (which isn't federal in any sense of the word) Constitution of 1787/89. The Nationalists took over and made Slavery "legal" for them to perpetrate, and that was done at a time when the true federal minded, law of the land minded, peaceful minded, defenders of liberty publicly acknowledged the fact that slavery was a crime "against nature itself," and steps were taken to defend the innocent victims of slavery.
The "convention" system of fraud was the process used by the nationalist slave traders to turn the United States (plural) into a Corporate Nation State (singular), and a second "convention" is not likely to reestablish, or acknowledge the true law of the land (common law), nor is a second "convention" likely to result in a return to a federation of independent states, returning from a singular, monopoly, corporate, Nation State.
The first "convention" placed the innocent people of America in the frying pan. A second "convention" is "legal" according to the slave trading document (Constitution of 1787/89), and a second "convention" is likely to result in all the innocent people in America going from the frying pan into the fire. The second "convention" could be used to eliminate the parts of the fraudulent Constitution of 1787/89 that were placed in place to maintain the color of law, such as The Bill of Rights, and any references to common law due process.
Article 1, Section 3
"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."
The supreme law of the land will be dictatorship without our employment of our moral common law due process; which advises us to maintain specific principles, such as the presumption of innocence in cases where an accuser has set in motion due process involving someone, even a president, or congressman, or lawyer, or prosecutor, or judge, of wrongful action that causes injury to innocent victims.