 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
http://www.power-independence.com/forum/view_topic.php?id=1226&forum_id=2
I don't know why communication is so difficult, as if we must communicate to each other in code.
If you think my viewpoint is evidence of mental illness, then I'd like to know (without having to get out a decoder) why you think my viewpoint is evidence of mental illness.
My viewpoint is plainly offered to you.
If you do not acknowledge the fact that the United States of America under the Constitution of 1787/89 is a criminal organization, and therefore not a lawful organization, then that failure to acknowledge that fact is, by your power of will, a crime accountable to you.
That is - in that way - evidence of either mental illness on your part, or criminal behavior is not a mental illness, rather than criminal behavior being a mental illness said criminal behavior is right as rain, natural, and good for life: moral.
So here are two people exchanging viewpoints and as far as I know my cards are all out on the table in plain view.
What inspires you to give the fraudulent United States of America (under the fraudulent Constitution of 1787/89) any credit of having any lawful authority, assuming that is what you are doing?
What inspires you to willfully choose not to acknowledge the fact that lawful authority for anyone claiming the Constitution of 1787/89 as their just, moral, source of authority is false, a fraud, and the opposite of lawful authority?
The slave traders guilty of crimes against nature itself (according to, at least, Thomas Jefferson in his first draft of the Declaration of Independence) made slavery legal when they perpetrated the fraud known as The Constitution of 1787/89, and the Latin (code) term for that is prima facie evidence: caught red handed.
Who in this world needs to be taught that enslaving innocent people (and all that must go with enslaving, including torture and murder) is a crime?
Only the criminals themselves need to know this fact that slavery is a crime? That brings to light the unnatural, immoral, genetic defects, whereby a living organism is incapable of understanding moral right from moral wrong, and is therefore not guilty of choosing to do wrong, but the point here is to point out that it is wrong to give such mutations power required to enslave mankind with such things as the example provided by the fraud known as The Constitution of 1787/89.
Trading with the enemy.
So now, with my cards again on the table, in other words, I am inspired to look further into the coded messages, to find, perhaps once again, more evidence proving that my viewpoint is sound.
As was the case when looking into the work of Albert Pike, whereby it was acknowledged that trial by jury was, in some way, useful to him.