 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
"A right of action cannot arise out of fraud."
The United States of America began as a legitimate (lawful = not fraudulent) association of voluntary defenders whose common enemy at the time was British criminals perpetrating fraudulent forms of (thereby false) government.
The United States of America was then turned from a legitimate government into a criminal government the moment the fraud known as The Constitution of 1787 was (fraudulently) acted upon, as if The Constitution of 1787 was not a fraud.
1. Expose the fraud perpetrated in 1787 under the (false) name The Constitution of 1787/89, in an official, legal, manner.
2. Do not act in defense against the most damaging fraud in American history for whatever reason is imagined by those who do not, or even refuse to, act in defense against the most damaging fraud in American history.
I read in the works attributed to Pike that failure to act is as much a crime as any other crime involving willful actions that result in injury to innocent people.
What makes anyone (confessions?) think that Admiralty "court" is legitimate, legal, lawful, moral, or in any way useful to free people in liberty whose common need is voluntary mutual defense against all who willfully destroy innocent people: including fraudulent authorities of science, religion, industry, and law?
I'm curious.