 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
"Common law is stare decisis - case law. That is the way that it is."
That, again, is absent any moral value, quality, worth, measure, and it explains nothing other than an unclear reference to record keeping, and a possible employment of records kept, for an ambiguous, unstated, goal.
Then, seemingly contrary to the expression of ambiguous fact, in edict form as far as I can tell, is a contrary statement, contrary to the previous edict like statement.
"The Credit River Money Decision is a sample of real life 1968 Minnesota jury formation like you say."
Thanks for that, I'll look into it. I have volunteered for Jury Duty twice. One case went to trial. The other case involved a Judge overruling the demand by the prosecutor during voir dire proceedings to censor me. Then apparently both "lawyers" (BAR members: foreign corporate agents) wanted me censored, removed, which was the case in that case: I was asked to leave, the judge caved in on the requests of both foreign corporate agents.
Common law, the moral process where volunteers volunteer for mutual defense of all, is not what it once was, so the claim of stare decisis doesn't pass muster very well, as the case law of cases that exemplify efficient, expedient, effective, defense of all appears to have vanished, while the remaining "history" in records kept, and used now, are examples of failures to defend all.
How about the much too late trial of the conspiracy murder of Martin Luther King Jr?
Can that case serve when employing stare decisis and case law?
Don't wait 60 years for trial by the country to determine that the government is guilty of conspiracy murder, good lesson learned well?
Where are the indictments, presentments, and true bills for whoever was (and is) conspiring to murder innocent people while the conspiring murderers are occupying so called government office and wielding so called government power now that it has been officially determined that the government is, in fact, guilty of conspiracy murder?
That is a very interesting finding of fact in that Credit River Money Decision. So now, having that established as fact, can we return to real (accurately valuable) money in this (former) Federation of independent states? Also, where are the indictments, presentments, and true bills issued from common law justices of the peace, having formed grand juries, to hold the money frauds - under the color of law no less - to account for their crimes?