View single post by David Merrill
 Posted: Tue Jan 17th, 2017 07:30 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
David Merrill

 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 I suppose that my method is to simplify. I apologize if that is what I am trying to do with our discussion. The most common problem I encounter is that common law is case law; stare decisis. That is what is going on in the courtrooms in America.



I have certainly encountered intentional lack of bonding, which makes for everything to be the path of must and necessity.

I suppose that with the image above from 1790 you simply have to pick apart the finding of fact back to 1666 and 1213 to grasp why if we won the Revolutionary War, were we required to start paying reparations?

This might be at the heart of what seems to be complicating common law.

Before the American Revolution (return to rule of law, not usurpation of law) a system known as summary justice was in force so as to fraudulently extort wealth from Americans (and all Colonies of the criminal British) and in so doing enslave Americans.

That is the nature of a colony.

We are still under the Crown. The Crown is under the Pope - Treaty of 1213. This is why we find the Pope kissing the ground on the tarmac when he got off his plane in Britain.

This is fascinating but to summarize, we were set to fealty on a plantation after the Revolutionary War. Paying rent instead of excise.

This is the nature of 501(C)(3) government homage and tribute. You do not have to be Roman Catholic to conjoin in the separation by commercial priestcraft. To reconcile you must be the church.

Attachment: Doc 31 - Notice of Void Judgments published EPCO & Custer.pdf (Downloaded 0 times)