 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
Summary Answer Attempt:
The worst criminals are the worst because they do the most damage. Had rule of law worked as intended, a magistrate in a county would have all lawful power required to set in motion an accusation against a George Washington type criminal, or a Alexander Hamilton type criminal, or a George Bush type criminal, or a Hilary Clinton type criminal, meaning one of the worst criminals because failure to hold them to an accurate accounting (trial by the country) enables them to continue their evil work, no different then failing to hold a local con man to an accurate accounting, the range of destruction from local con man to treasonous conspirator is obvious with the body count of tortured dead people, and the number of slaves enslaved by the criminal in any case.
Thank you. It is rare to cross paths with somebody who can articulate all that coherently.
I found this symbol of Levi, being custodianship of the record, within Freemasonry, at the Mason Museum.
The Pope's (Bishop of Rome) has been there since 1213 - The Treaty of 1213. But you will already know that canon law has usurped divine law since the canon of (around) 326 AD. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/medieval.asp
Curiously the Treaty of 1213 is no longer available on the Avalon Project? This always makes me so glad I grabbed it.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImYkU2eW1fNTVPSWs/view?usp=sharing
I am not telling you to believe that the Pope owns everything. If you believe that my apparent assertions are nothing but an imagination disorder, then also believe that I hope you will sit back and read, and enjoy this as entertainment you will find nowhere else indeed!
Looking around here, since 2006 there are only a couple hands full of registered users. Apparently there is a low adoption rate? There are readers though, and this is explosive in mental mind bomb form, through proper detonation.
Melchizedek replaces Levi as the EMF (torroid) becomes unified. That is to say, as the Israelite and Gentile become blury, the law boundary gets fuzzy and the immediate problem is that usury (interest) becomes illegal by divine law - the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.
So watch this:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImSG9yTExab2JnU1E/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImalBQWHNUa1hsNk0/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImdUdjemZtckxwZm8/view?usp=sharing
And try wrapping your mind around this:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImb0lfRF9CdldvOTA/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImN00wbG14S1pzUHM/view?usp=sharing
That is just some reading that I feel may prepare you for comprehending the construction of 1789. What I want you to ponder though, is the definition of common law.
It is case law - stare decisis. The wisdom of the cases - their orders, judgments decrees and opinions were adopted from England. One could form and appeal and cite "authority" and appellate courts are forbidden to practice law.
You allude to a petite jury and grand jury convolution in percieved authority. The county court can practice law but that trained attorney does not like his practice of law to be overturned and retried upon review (appeal). So he contemplates his utterances from this lower court, where he is allowed to practice law (oxymoron?) being appealed and compared by trained shepardizers of opinions before circuit justices - whose hands are bound. So who is higher?
The clerk, keeper of the record is the "highest". A court of record has authority. A court not of record is a voluntary equity forum.
This website and Thread is on my Favorites so I will be back here to develop this. Meanwhile consider that the Masons are Levi - the custodians and they were quite excited that I, Melchizedek had finally arrived to hear the truth about history, fact and law.
Attachment: Treaty of 1213 clause.jpg (Downloaded 39 times)