 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Again the example works best in tearing down the obstacles in the way of reasonable inquisition into accurate, and therefore useful, actionable, answers.
Returning to the recent Hammond case in Harney County Oregon offers said example in replay of that event from the moment that the Public Record included a report concerning a witness willing to go on the record with an accusation which claimed that BLM personnel set fires so as to cause damage to the Hammond family lives, liberty, and property.
That is the point at which all the moral people in that county share the common need to defend the public liberty, which is the common, shared, agreeable, means to effect prosperity for each individual and for posterity, for without that public liberty there might as well be no air, no oxygen, no water, no land, no food, no shelter, none of the so called property given to mankind for their stewardship, their maintenance, their ability to improve it, to employ it, and to afford them the means to survive, and to prosper. Without the public liberty all good things eventually come to an end as the first act to destroy the public liberty is soon to inspire a second, then a fourth, than 16 more acts to destroy the public liberty, then exponentially more acts, until such time as everyone is against everyone else, and there is no longer any time and energy left to accomplish anything useful, each is defending a back stabbing while each is stabbing someone else in the back.
So that point at which the Public Record includes that specific actionable (cause for action) account of that criminal act (arson) perpetrated under the color of law would be, and in part actually was, the inspiration (cause) to act in defense, and one action was that formation of that Safetee Committee.
Why does that concern Union States Assembly?
The answer is clearly that any individuals who suddenly are inspired to act in defense against the public liberty by agents perpetrating crimes under the color of law are like an atom on a snow flake on the surface of a huge ship sinking iceberg, and they could certainly use some help in knowing how large this iceberg actually is, and they sure could use help in navigating to safe waters.
The answer is then more than simply forming one safety committee so as to effectively deal with one arson fire caused by one foreign owned corporate agency and said accused (but presumed to be innocent until proven guilty lawfully) agents. The answer is to understand the true meaning of the information that must be added to the public record during the trial of the suspect accused of arson under the color of law, which is not merely arson, which would involve a private individual willfully, and with malice aforethought, perpetrating a crime upon another private individual, because the crime involves the color of law (fraud) aspect, which then involves looking under the surface of that iceberg, which was already done in the Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder Trial.
So what happens in the minds of these people who finally are caused to act, with such things as a safety committee against attacks under the color of law upon innocent people in their county, in their independent state, when they confront the false federal government power?
Do they need help in knowing, measuring, seeing, uncovering, and reasoning out, all that is submerged under the surface of that iceberg? Who has the answers, who knows the accurate account, and who can provide, step by step how the crime took place when it first took place in America, and therefore who then is in a position to advise these people in these position to move clearly in the right direction to reform lawful (common law) county governments, with lawful (common law) county Sheriffs, and lawful (common law) county magistrates (justices of the peace), so as to then have the lawful gate opened whereby lawful accusations, such as the accusation of treasonous arson against the foreign owned, foreign run, corporate, private, BLM, move from mere accusation to a formation of a Grand Jury, from the pool from which a Grand Jury is formed, which is the 100 or more (depending upon the numbers of people in the county) magistrates, and those magistrates have civil and criminal jurisdiction, and if said Grand Jury finds cause to act in defense because the accusation is reasonable, then a presentment is made out of the accusation, and said presentment moves as an offer to the accused to afford the accused their opportunity to remedy, redeem, restore, and return to lawful society (forgive but not forget) with whatever the jury, with the help of magistrates, judges, history (stare decisis), or "information" that aids, abets, lends moral support, and lends material support to those representatives of the whole country, to afford them the TRUTH they need to do the right thing in that case.
In history, when lawful society works, the typical "punishment" is a fine, not prison (which is now cruel and unusual punishment, private corporate for profit criminal markets, debt slavery, and so called war on drugs, mixed with a whole lot of so called political prisoner dilemma), and again the Martin Luther King Jr., Conspiracy Murder trial offers an example.
Accurate accounting is the goal, to know better from worse, and becoming that which we (supposedly) abhor is not the goal.
So those people who finally step up, because organically they are forced into defense in time and place, and they do the right thing with such things as Safety Committees, are then in a position to be contacted, offered the true account of their situation in their county, and they are then better prepared to keep the work going in their county to reach for that ultimate goal, which is a reasonable goal, with step by step moves to make in order to arrive at the goal, and pass on the duty to others who keep lawful society in place as a deterrence.
What is the step to take once a county elects a "constitutional" sheriff, meaning a common law sheriff, who is not a member of a foreign owned, foreign controlled, corporate entity, or legal fiction?
To me a step before that is the election and affording jurisdiction of common law magistrates, or justices of the peace, and their duty is as a gate keeper for lawful accusations, and their steps taken include the formation of Grand Juries for each accusation placed in their care.
Once the county is running according to lawful due process how are those people in that county then inspired to take the next step to form a lawful state out of the existing corporate (foreign owned, and privately owned, and privately run) state, and how, if not an original federated state (13 in number?), how can those people be inspired to take the steps, once they have a lawful state, to enter the lawful federation that was started in 1775/76?