 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
[Specific to National Liberty Alliance, and this first draft is my personal letter to them, in an effort to communicate my individual position relative to my individual understanding of National Liberty Alliance, what those people agree on, and how that can agree with the people in Union States Assembly, at least as far as I know so far]
I don't know if you remember me, it has been more than a year since I was asked to "shut up" in National Liberty Alliance, since it was claimed that my communications were detrimental to the common cause shared by those at National Liberty Alliance.
Example viewpoint offered: http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/monday-conference-11-3-2014
Returning now to continue the effort to communicate is a specific perceived need to help unify divided factions into one common cause.
The common cause, in a word, is the truth, and therefore the common enemy, again in one word, is falsehood, or deception.
It is vital to know the divisions of falsehood if we share the same common cause. All are victims of falsehood, some are willfully creating it: deceivers. That division inspired such things as the division between mens rea (guilty of mind) and actus reus (guilty in fact), as an individual may be captured into a lie, unknowingly, while they themselves spread it, and that is not the same thing as someone willfully creating, infecting, spreading, with malice aforethought, a specific deception.
If our common, shared, agreeable, bond, binding us, as moral people, is this elusive truth, and if our common, shared, disagreeable, enemy is this anti-truth stuff, then I think we need to understand one very destructive deception at this moment, as you read this attempt at an olive branch message.
Divided groups of people confess their malignancy when people in those divided groups inspire deceptive, aggressive, antagonistic, conflict, internally, and externally, as divided groups of people are then incapable of sharing a common goal: despite the divisions that divide those groups of people.
An example is useful in the effort to convince, so as to avoid confusion as to the true meaning of division among groups of people who manage to share common goals despite having divided, separate, interests.
Protestant and Catholic groups can certainly share a common bond, yet for demonstrable reasons the common enemy of all the people everywhere still manages to infiltrate and inspire destructive conflict between the divided groups of people.
Example 2 is the point at which it might be possible to unify a number of groups of people that include Oath Keepers, Cspoa, Fully Informed Jury Association, John Birch Society, Libertarian Party, National Liberty Alliance, Global Debt Facility (Karen Hudes), Prison Planet (Alex Jones), and many other groups internal to the United States of America (separate, divided, people in individual countries or states), or external to those people in those federated states.
The reason for people in states to unify, while remaining divided, is the reason why this olive branch must ring true with our military brethren.
The Army is divided from the Navy, the Marines, and the Air Force. If they do not cooperate, if instead they find reason to fight each other, then two concurrent, destructive, processes are at work. The combined power of their cooperation is gone, as they are no longer a force that can deter (which is the goal, not to destroy) the enemy, and that force which could have ended the enemies injury to anyone (deterrence) is destroying itself.
There can be no single military force of one, and this understanding must be understood by those who are suffering from the deception working in their minds known by many names such as Nationalism.
The nation, if there is one, is New York. The federation is not New York. The reason for that division is the same reason explained above, as One Nation, under God, may be Protestant, or Quaker, or Amish, or Mormon, or Baptist, or any division that is not antagonistic, under the sun.
What is the reason for the antagonism and is it a good idea, or a bad idea, to accurately account for it, and to defend against it?
With the help of Debra, another (former?) member of National Liberty Alliance, I have been exchanging information, cooperating with, a group of people who constitute the Union States Assembly, and this group offers, in part, a valuable contribution to the common cause of all free people in (what remains of) liberty.